WashPost Fashion Critic: Pricey John Edwards Haircuts 'A Breck Girl Move'

Photo of Tim Graham.

Washington Post fashion writer Robin Givhan, who's often slashed at the fractured fashions of Team Bush, and who in 2004 hailed the hair of John Edwards (it "cries out to be tousled"), surprised readers on Friday by finding Edwards guilty of "primping" with his $400 haircuts. She doesn't go the whole way and mock his rich vs. poor "Two Americas" talk, but it's bubbling under the surface. Early on, she notes a "Bush loyalist" called Edwards a "Breck Girl," (um, isn't "Rush Limbaugh" a better tag for who started that?) and then Judge Robin ruled:

Edwards considers triple-digit grooming expenses a part of campaigning. He listed his salon and spa bills under "consulting/events," after all...But there is a line between grooming and primping. Brushing your teeth is grooming. Giving yourself a big Chiclet smile with veneers is primping. Having an adept barber come around to the hotel to give a busy candidate a trim is grooming. Getting the owner of an expensive Beverly Hills salon to come over, knowing full well that the cost is going to be 10 times what the average Joe is likely to pay for a haircut . . . that's a Breck girl move.

Political candidates of all stripes want to show off their big ideas, superior intellect, uncommon leadership skills. But they also spend a lot of time making clear their ability to relate to the average man. That's what all the diner visits, rolled-up sleeves and folksy talk are meant to do. A $400 haircut isn't folksy. And it doesn't matter who's paying for it.

Givhan also earns points for at least mentioning the "I Feel Pretty" YouTube video of Edwards. Before she learned of the titanic tabs for the Edwards haircuts, back in 2004, Givhan raved over the mane of the Silky Pony (that's Laura Ingraham's nom de coif):

He has a precise haircut with artfully clipped layers. His hair is a beautiful shade of chocolate brown with honey-colored highlights. It is not particularly long, but it is smooth and shiny. It is boyish hair not because of the style but because it looks so healthy and buoyant and practically cries out to be tousled the same way a well-groomed golden retriever demands to be nuzzled.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Here in the south we have a w

Here in the south we have a word for people like Breck Boy John Edwards. It is called snob. We also have a saying that his nose is so far turned up in the air that he has to stay out of the rain or he would drowned.

My biggest laugh this week was when he said that he could win the south. He couldn't have won a second term for Senate in this state if he had run.

Dennis Miller called him an empty suit. Words could not have described him any better.

A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.

Arnold's Word

Edwards is the quintessential "girly man" to borrow from  Governor Schwarzenegger. Ultimately Edwards will prove too delicate for the voters. The Democrats need someone with testosterone like Hillary.

.

allanf,I almost spit my coffe

allanf,

I almost spit my coffee out...that was funny!

I agree, that should have h

I agree, that should have had a "spew alert"!! LMAO!

No one talks about a candidate's towering intellect. It's all about "electability". Image is everything. Unfortunately, with Edwards, it's become a liability, because it makes him look like a snob. Have you seen the photo of Hillary with the turquise scarf around her neck over her black pantsuit? Another showed her in a black pantsuit with a delicate hot pink sweater tied around her shoulders over her black pantsuit? (Who in their right mind ties a thin sweater over a pantsuit????) Does anyone doubt that a fashion consultant told her to add a splash of color?? Image is important, but it has to come naturally...the candidate can't be seen to be "working" on the image thing....Edwards and Hillary are so obvious....

I hope Thompson can be the

I hope Thompson can be the one candidate who doesn't feel over managed. Obama seems to be doing well in that department too. I think Huffington made a great point when she wrote about candidates being deathly afraid of being authentic.

In his 2004 run for the Democ

In his 2004 run for the Democratic nomination, Edwards told us that there were "Two Americas."  I guess I see his point now ---- There's the America that spends $400 for a haircut, and there's everyone else.

Pink Sapphire Salon

It's not just the haircut. Edwards also visited a salon called the Pink Sapphire Spa in Manchester, N.H. for a makeup treatment. You can read about the services offered by the Pink Sapphire Spa in the DUmmie FUnnies.

To paraphrase "South Par

To paraphrase "South Park": "Come out of the closet, John."

"The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously." --Hubert Humphrey

At this point I think Edwar

At this point I think Edwards ($400 haircut, I'm So Pretty) is done, Guiliani (marriage woes that I don't even fully understand) is done, McCain (Iraq Market) is done, Romney (changes with the wind and life long hunter) is done... we're rapidly running out of candidates.

Romney is the man

I keep hearing about Romney supposedly flip flopping.  Being that he was my Governor for two terms I would know if he flip flopped on something.  Please elaborate.

Um well, he ran for gov. as p

Um well, he ran for gov. as pro-choice and now he's pro-life. That's the first one that jumps out at me. He tried to position himself as a liberal republican when he was running in a liberal state, but now that he's on the national stage he's suddenly very conservative. I mean, seriously, are you guys buying it? Do you trust him? He seems as slimy as Kerry to me.

Plus, he pissed me off when he did everything he possibly could to stop gay marriage in Mass.

Mischaracterizing Romney

I believe that's a mischaracterization of his position.   Didn't he say he was personally against abortion, but would tolerate it?   Now, he says his position has "evolved and deepened", and that he is firmly pro-life. 

Romney is going to have a hard time overcoming the flip-flop label, but I don't believe it applies to him.   People do evolve.  Ron Reagan and others have, including me.

Kerry, on the other hand is a true flip-flopper.  He's a wind-vane on issues. 

It's pretty apparent that your opinion of Romney is rooted in his opposition to gay marriage.

I'm taking a wait and see attitude on Romney, but I'm impressed by his great ability to problem solve.

But it is convenient that h

But it is convenient that he's pro choice when it helps his campaign, and then pro-life when it helps him get the national nomination... I watched some excerpts from his debate with Kennedy several years ago and he seems quite different. (surprisingly handsome too.) I have no problem with him evolving his position, but I don't think the average voter is going to trust him anymore, especially after the hunting fiasco.

And, I'm quite able to have a more fully developed opinion than just relying on that one issue to make up my mind, no matter how close it is to my heart. Besides, I'm not really talking about my opinion of him, I'm talking about the general perception I think people have.

You STILL mischaracterize Romney.

You STILL mischaracterize Romney.  It seems to be something the liberals are doing with enthusiasm.  Even Gary Trudeau spent more than a week trashing and lying about Romney.  Yesterday, for example, he said if you google Mitt Romny and flip-flop, you will get 5,435,000 hits.  I tried and got 106,000 hits.  Comedic hyperbole?  Hardly.  From Trudeau, it's always ideological hyperbole.   

Makes me wonder if the left fears him.

Anyway, Romney was not "pro-choice."  He was personally against abortion but willing to accept the law as it stood.  He has changed that willingness to accept it.

As for your opinion, your mischaracterization, your use of "p*ssed off", and your comparing him to "slimy Kerry" speaks more loudly than your protestations.

Again, I agree that he has an uphill battle...now that the liberal media has set his image.

Um, I'm sorry, I like to th

Um, I'm sorry, I like to think that I'm fairly well-read, but I'm not familiar with Gary Trudeau. I will look him up. The name sounds familiar.

I'm just telling you the general view I have of him as someone who follows this stuff a bit more than casually.

To me, Edwards, Guiliani, Romney, and McCain are unelectable. I really don't think the left fears Romney, in fact I think they'll be happy if he gets the nod. I think they would be more scared of Thompson personally.

Umm, for all intents-and-purposes he was running as a "pro-choice" candidate. I think that's what people see. I am fully aware that he was personally against abortion at the time, but I think that may not really matter in some people's eyes. In fact, it may be worse. The Pro-Lifers could see him and think that this guy will sell us out if he thinks it will help him politically. Or perhaps not... but for voters who hold abortion as their number one concern, I would be surprised if they rally around Romney.

I actually have no real opinion on abortion. So it doesn't bother me one way or the either what side he's on.

What does saying "p*ssed off" and calling Kerry slimy say about me? Is it not cool to say "p*ssed off" on these boards? I don't mean to break any rules or be disrespectful. (And off to bed with me.)

vrava

1)   Trudeau writes Doonsbury.  So much for being "well read", or that you "follow this stuff a bit more than casually"  (meaning that you're suggesting that you're alert to political influences)

2)  Why do liberals insist on lecturing conservatives who they think is "electable?"

3)  "for all intents and purposes?"  Weasel words.  You flatly stated (twice?) that he was "pro choice."  You have a habit of trying to take multiple sides of positions.  

4)  This is a "duh" moment.  Your invective against Romney tells about your very strong anti-Romney opinion....it is NOT about you.

Haircut

Anyone who would spend $400 for a haircut, either their own money or campaign funds has no business being president.  If he is this stupid imagine what he would do with taxpayer money.

And he didn't even get a grea

And he didn't even get a great haircut.

Can you say "Fred Thomps

Can you say "Fred Thompson" ??

Don't settle for a RINO. Let's find and support a TRUE conservative.

Yep, he's the only viable o

Yep, he's the only viable one I see on the right at the moment. I would quite enjoy an Obama / Thompson race.

And I would like to see a Tho

And I would like to see a Thompson/Tancredo ticket.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

Does Tancredo really have a

Does Tancredo really have a shot? For the past 8 years or so the Republicans have been trying very hard to court the hispanic vote. Tancredo would certainly cause a defection to the Dems and probably cost them the race.

Tancredo

Without knowing the numbers I don't know. However, in conversations I have had with legal Hispanics they tend to agree with Tancredo. I honestly don't think Thompson would put Tancredo on his ticket, but a man can dream.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

You know that's very true. I

You know that's very true. I lived in Houston and knew quite a lot of hispanics who were firmly against illegal immigrants (even though some of them were actually illegal.) But, I don't think the proportion of hispanics who think that way is particularly high. And Tancredo might cross that line from just being against illegal immigrants to actuallly being against hispanics in general. At least he might in some people's eyes.

The only remaining question w

The only remaining question would be, where he gets his Brazilian waxing.

Rochester, Minnesota: A Fem_Leftist City!

*shiver*

*shiver*

Why is Edwards laying out f

Why is Edwards laying out four yards for a haircut? He is not taking the money out of his wallet. As he bi-itches about corporate benefits of so many hard working successful people he opens the campaign vault to entitle himself to life's luxuries.

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life

NEWS FLASHJohn Edwards Trails

NEWS FLASH

John Edwards Trails in Poll in Own State-Newsmax 4-20-07

Edwards: I am Tested in the South-Newsmax 4-16-07

According to a poll by Elon Universtiy he is in third behind you-know-who and Osama.

A bonafided and certified member of the beer guzzling, NASCAR watching middle class.