John Markell, the owner of the gun shop that sold one of the guns that was used in the Virginia Tech massacre, appeared on CNN's "Larry King Live" on Wednesday evening, not only to recount the situation behind the sale, but also told host Larry King that he was receiving threatening messages through his business's website. In response, King first said, "That's kind of ironic that people opposed to guns are threatening you with bodily harm." When Markell said he had been called a murderer as well, King replied, "Now, that's totally unfair, John. We're with you, and I thank you for sharing these moments with us."
On March 13, just over a month before his shooting rampage, killer Cho Seung Hui bought a .9 millimeter Glock handgun, and a box of 50 bullets at Roanoke Firearms, the gun shop Markell owns. In an ABC News report on April 17, Markell described Cho as a "clean-cut college kid," but wasn't actually present during the purchase. During his interview with King, Markell repeated his description of Cho as a "clean-cut college kid," and stated that the clerk who sold Cho the Glock handgun "barely remembered him because the sale went so smoothly." He also stated that Cho had lied one on the required forms for the purchase, which asked whether he had been "adjucated mentally defective" (a General District Court in Virginia found that Cho was "mentally ill and presents an imminent danger to self or others" in December 2005).
Markell and his gun shop's connection to the Virginia Tech shootings has received a significant amount of press coverage over the past days.
A transcript of Markell's interview on Wednesday's "Larry King Live:"
LARRY KING: Joining us in Roanoke, Virginia, is John Markell, the owner of Roanoke Firearms, where Cho Seung-Hui bought the guns that were apparently used in the shootings.
John, do you remember anything about that sale?
JOHN MARKELL, OWNER, ROANOKE FIREARMS: No, Larry, I wasn't even in the shop that day. I talked to the clerk who was there. It was such an uneventful sale, and it was five weeks ago. The ATF had to show us a picture so we actually knew who it was. I did not recognize him. I don't believe he's been in the shop before. The clerk barely remembered him because the sale went so smoothly.
KING: Any indication that he had ever had a problem with instability?
MARKELL: Oh, none at all. I mean we did the normal background check. We sent the paper work to the state police. They checked it out with the FBI and told us to approve the sale. And as far as his demeanor, he was just calm, collected, just a clean-cut college kid.
KING: Now, had you known he was described previously as mentally ill, is that a reason not to sell firearms?
MARKELL: Absolutely. There's a question on the form that asks that very question, so he lied and put no.
KING: And of course, when someone lies, what can you do about it?
MARKELL: Well, in this case, the FBI should have determined that it was a lie but they didn't. There was really no way for me to get that information. Medical information is private and is not available to people like me.
KING: How long is the waiting period before you can pick up a gun?
MARKELL: There is no waiting period. We have to look at a lot of identification with a foreign national. So, after I looked at all of that, because - that's a Virginia driver's license, a checkbook, an INS card, and then we sent off the information to the state police. Normally, there's going to be a delay for someone who is not a citizen, so he probably walked out with the gun somewhere between half hour and an hour.
KING: Would you change any of the gun laws?
MARKELL: I think somebody dropped the ball on his mental condition. As I understand it that is the only thing in his past that would have prevented him from buying a gun. If we have 20,000 gun laws, I don't think one more is going to make a difference. It wouldn't have stopped him. How many laws did he break when he killed all of those people?
KING: You told me today, we spoke a little earlier, that you're getting threatening mail?
MARKELL: We finally had to shut our website down after the 200th -- well, they weren't all death threats but most were, most threats -- many threatening bodily harm.
KING: That's kind of ironic people opposed to guns are threatening you with bodily harm.
MARKELL: I have had two phone calls today calling me a murderer.
KING: Now, that's totally unfair, John. We're with you, and I thank you for sharing these moments with us.
MARKELL: Sure. My daughter went to Virginia Tech.
KING: Oh really?
MARKELL: She graduated in 1997.
KING: John Markell, the owner of Roanoke Firearms.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Ok, I'm new here, but is th
April 19, 2007 - 23:16 ET by vravaOk, I'm new here, but is this article exposing a liberal media bias?
. . . and thus its starts a
April 19, 2007 - 23:19 ET by Free Stinker. . . and thus its starts anew . . .
Welcome
April 19, 2007 - 23:21 ET by Cool ArrowIt's possible Larry King saw things correctly this time. He can be fair at times. He's just boring as h*ll.
So nothing objectionable he
April 19, 2007 - 23:31 ET by vravaSo nothing objectionable here, right? Just making sure I'm not missing something.
Cho should not have been able
April 20, 2007 - 00:13 ET by M J BCho should not have been able to purchase the gun; period. The local gun control law needs to be more thorough.
Could we possibly agree not t
April 20, 2007 - 00:19 ET by BlondeCould we possibly agree not to give this murderer a proper name?
Just call him mass murderer, or somesuch?
Naming him justifies his atrocity.
How about Cho BlowCho mamaAx
April 20, 2007 - 00:25 ET by Cool ArrowHow about Cho Blow
M J B
April 20, 2007 - 00:21 ET by gfrrmanM J B, what would have been "more thorough" that would have prevented him from getting a gun?
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Seems like the first step w
April 20, 2007 - 00:43 ET by vravaSeems like the first step would be not relying on the honor system. Maybe check those forms to make sure they aren't lying.
Just exactly how could the la
April 20, 2007 - 08:05 ET by BeowulfJust exactly how could the law have been "more thorough" MJB? Unless you're advocating a true Big Brother system, where every aspect of our lives is documented. The NICS (National Instant Check System) searches the FBI database for criminal records, not mental health records. You can't have it both ways. Either we retain some privacy or none at all. The only way to have prevented this animal from purchasing a gun legally would be to tie mental illness with criminal behavior. And assuming we did this, what would have stopped him from acquiring a gun illegally, or making a pipe bomb from household ingredients, or just plain running over pedestrians with a car? This guy was bound and determined to kill people, and nothing would have prevented it (unless you believe Minority Report is for real).
The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers
Vrava:While the vast majori
April 20, 2007 - 00:25 ET by Ken ShepherdVrava:
While the vast majority of our posts expose and combat liberal media bias, some posts are used to illustrate a refreshing departure from media bias, to give a kudos to a balanced journalist, etc.
Other posts at times may deal with larger journalistic issues that are not specifically left-right controversies. Witness the debate over airing the VT mass murderer's videos.
Ah, thank you very kindly f
April 20, 2007 - 00:45 ET by vravaAh, thank you very kindly for the explanation.
As we enter day 5 of the &q
April 20, 2007 - 05:03 ET by sarcasmoAs we enter day 5 of the "what antidepressant drug, at what dosage, made by what pharmaceutical company, and prescribed by what doctor????" total media blackout, I'm left wondering if any of these talking heads will finally do some journalism 101...Sure doesn't seem likely!!
JMR
Great. The fact that he li
April 20, 2007 - 06:23 ET by motherbeltGreat. The fact that he lied on his form will just set the liberals to howling that see, the forms are no good anyway, because people lie, and all the more reason to just not allow gun sales, period.
I started to think it was kind of neat that Larry King actually drew a line at people calling the gunshop owner a murderer. But then I remembered he never contradicts anything his guests say, so that's not a surprise either.
You think now the media has f
April 20, 2007 - 07:55 ET by Sua SponteYou think now the media has found the first person to blame? (the gunshop owner)
Of course, the last person to be fingered will be the oxigen thief. "The poor child was a misunderstood, abused...
Sua, there is an article on
April 20, 2007 - 08:20 ET by WolfremSua, there is an article on Drudge, here's the link. According to his grandfather and great aunt, the murderer was diagnosed with autism at age 8. So the "poor child" play is beginning it appears.
After reading this article, it appears to me that he had an issue with rejection. IMHO, the first victim he shot may have turned him down which, and after stalking two others previously, is probably what set him off.
"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana
And here it comes...http://ww
April 20, 2007 - 12:29 ET by Sua SponteAnd here it comes...
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/4/20/74655.shtml?s=icp