Rosie on Catholic Justices: 'How About Separation of Church and State?'

Photo of Justin McCarthy.
  • Bookmark and Share

On April 19, the ladies of "The View" offered their analysis of the Gonzales v. Carhart decision upholding a federal partial birth abortion ban. Most of the segment was a back and forth between Rosie O’Donnell, who clearly opposed the decision and Elisabeth Hasselbeck, who supported it. Joy Behar and Barbara Walters chimed in occasionally with Behar clearly in the abortion rights camp and Barbara Walters mildly there. Video: Real (1.4 MB) or Windows (1.6 MB); plus MP3 (256 KB)

Rosie expressed horror that there are five Catholics on the Supreme Court and Catholics on the Court apparently violate the "separation of church and state"

O’DONNELL: You know what concerns me? How many Supreme Court judges are Catholic, Barbara?

WALTERS: Five.

O’DONNELL: Five. How about separation of church and state in America?

WALTERS: Every one of them, when they were going through their Senate confirmation hearings said the fact of my religion does not mean that I will vote a particular way because of my religion. So we cannot say that they did it because they’re Catholic. It is interesting that they’re Catholic.

Through the course of the segment, Rosie repeatedly emphasized that partial birth abortions only represent a very small percentage of abortions annually. Elisabeth reminded her that, that is still 2,000 lives lost each year.

Rosie repeatedly played up fears that this is "a way to get in to start eroding Roe v Wade," and it’s "as if the women’s movement never happened." She even quoted Gloria Steinem line, "if men can get pregnant abortion would be a sacrament." Rosie also provided this factually flawed analysis.

"The difference is, you know, we are half the population and there was a women's movement and, you know, feminism really was the reason that this bill, women's reproductive rights ever came into the forefront and was entered and was Constitutionally upheld since ‘73."

Roe v. Wade did not uphold any law. In fact, it struck down a Texas law prohibiting abortion. The entire transcript is below.

ROSIE O’DONNELL: Speaking back to where we started also Supreme Court came down and the first time since 1973 with a partial abortion ban.

BARBARA WALTERS: Five to four.

O’DONNELL: Five to four was the Supreme Court vote. Now it's shocking to me. This is the first time since 1973. Everyone agrees partial birth abortion is horrific. It’s horrific for anyone who has to decide it. 1.3 million abortions done in America every year, 2,000 partial birth abortions. What is that? Zero [pause] .1 percent, 0.1. This is just a way--

ELISABETH HASSELBECK: That's represents 2,000 lives.

O’DONNELL: Right, well, that represents 2,000 women who are at risk and this was their only option. This was not- no one electively chooses to have this kind of abortion.

HASSELBECK: In the partial abortion act, there is an exemption where- if the woman’s life were at risk–

WALTERS: Only her life, not her health

HASSELBECK: Not her health because people could probably claim and have their doctors vouch for them it would cause undue stress, anxiety. There's a lot of blurriness.

WALTERS: You know, most women don't want to have, after the first three months, most women would not want to have an abortion.

O’DONNELL: Right, this is not an elective abortion.

WALTERS: The worry about this is not the partial birth abortion. Well, yes, it is. But the worry, one of the dissenters was Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, and I’m going to read it because she said the majority opinion "cannot be understood in anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by the Court" and that is Roe v Wade. They are afraid this begins to chip away.

O’DONNELL: And it does.

JOY BEHAR: But that’s also what the NRA says too thought about gun control. They also say that if you, if you ban certain guns then you’re chipping away at the Second Amendment. Everybody has the same argument.

HASSELBECK: But this was also, this was kind of a bipartisan effort, actually. I mean in terms of, there were 16 Democrats in the Senate that voted for this ban. There were 63 Democrats in the House that voted for this ban. So it kind of crosses --

O’DONNELL: I don’t think it’s partisan. It's women -- I think women, we are half the population and we can have our bodies legislated by the government.

BEHAR: And men make those decisions.

O’DONNELL: If men could get pregnant abortion would be a sacrament.

[Applause]

HASSELBECK: But I think– this is not. I think we have to be careful because this is not a ban on abortion. I think this- what happened yesterday was actually probably more representative of what the majority of Americans want. We are in a country where people, not myself because I'm anti-abortion, I think people want the right to their abortions. Women want the right to their own bodies in this country.

O’DONNELL: Yes, women's reproductive freedom.

HASSELBECK: Right, but they- most of the people, two-thirds of this country do not want partial birth abortions to be legal.

O’DONNELL: But Elisabeth, it's .15 percent.

HASSELBECK: 2,000 lives, but we count the lives of--

O’DONNELL: Listen. 0.15 percent and mostly the baby is severely ill or the mother's life is at risk. Nobody voluntarily goes in and says "please give me a partial birth abortion because I would like to physically injure-" It is a grotesque procedure.

HASSELBECK: It is grotesque. They remove the child and crush the skull. That child is born into this earth.

O’DONNELL: But usually the woman's life is at risk Elisabeth.

HASSEBECK: There's an exemption here. If the woman's life is at risk it wouldn’t even be-- it's a moot issue.

O’DONNELL: Correct, but why is it brought up? Because it's a way to get in to start eroding Roe v Wade.

WALTERS: That is what the scare is. The scare is does this begin, is this the slippery slope? And we don't know. We will see.

O’DONNELL: It's as if the women’s movement never happened

HASSELBECK: I don't think that's true.

O’DONNELL: I certainly do. It is frightening to me.

BEHAR: I never thought it would be overturned, but it probably will be at some point, just like the Brady Bill was overturned.

O’DONNELL: The difference is, you know, we are half the population and there was a women's movement and, you know, feminism really was the reason that this bill, women's reproductive rights ever came into the forefront and was entered and was Constitutionally upheld since ‘73.

BEHAR: Right.

O’DONNELL: The women's movement, now, ladies we need to get together because we are on the precipice going backwards not forwards. And it is--

HASSELBECK: I'm all for women's rights. I sat on a Title Nine committee. I just don't believe that partial birth abortion should be legal. I don’t think it should. If the woman’s life is not at threat--

BEHAR: But you usually say that government should stay out of people's business. This is an example of that. This should be between a woman and her doctor not the government, right?

HASSELBECK: I also believe in the right to life and I believe this is a grotesque way of taking a life away.

O’DONNELL: But Elisabeth, the baby is usually either deformed or dead.

HASSELBECK: If I were going to give birth and I knew that I was having a baby that was going to have a deformity or some sort of illness.

O’DONNELL: Not a hair lip, not a limb missing severely something--

HASSELBECK: It would, it would not make me want to abort that child. I believe that child --

O’DONNELL: I know, but guess what? That's your choice

HASSELBECK: That’s me I’m just saying me.

O’DONNELL: That's your choice. Right. And every woman deserves that choice.

WALTERS: Nobody is saying you must or you should or you shouldn't.. [applause] What they are saying is choice.

HASSELBECK: It's a legal situation. I don't necessarily think this is a slippery slope. I think it's a valid concern.

O’DONNELL: You know what concerns me? How many Supreme Court judges are Catholic, Barbara?

WALTERS: Five.

O’DONNELL: Five. How about separation of church and state in America?

WALTERS: Every one of them, when they were going through their Senate confirmation hearings said the fact of my religion does not mean that I will vote a particular way because of my religion. So we cannot say that they did it because they’re Catholic. It is interesting that they’re Catholic.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The Mouth rants once again!

Would somebody PULEEEEZE stuff a sock in that fat lesbo's mouth? Oh, wait a  minute - she puts her foot in it everytime she opens it - good enough! I hope Baba Wawa gives Rosie O'Dumber enough rope so that pretty soon she'll hang herself.

Never dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.

enough rope so that pretty so

enough rope so that pretty soon she'll hang herself.

We're gonna need a stronger rope. Steel cable maybe.

IMPEACH PELOSI NOW

Is a "Aircraft Carrier C

Is a "Aircraft Carrier Cable" strong enough for you?

Seperation of church and stat

Separation of church and state - also NOT A U.S. LAW - just like the fake "right to an abortion..."

Rosie must have her own special pocket constitution - just like KKK byrd...

Some one needs to tell these

Some one needs to tell these idiots that abortion is not a Constitutional right and it was never mention in the Constitution.  Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision made Abortion a noncriminal act...

In that case, according to

In that case, according to Supreme Judge O'Donnell, anyone who is Catholic can never be a juror, nevermind a Justice of the Supreme Court. Next thing you know, the Catholic juror will be voting "guilty" because of a religious belief that murder is wrong....

Too bad Liz isn't too mean to

Too bad Liz isn't too mean to say something to Rosie's anti-cathloic rules along the lines of :

"tell you what, you want to ban catholics from being in the government, and I want to ban gays."

Then watch Rosie self destruct.

CitA.....or Elizabeth after R

CitA..

...or Elizabeth after Rosie reaches over and chokes her to death....

you kidding? Rosie's stomach

you kidding? Rosie's stomach wouldn't let her bend forward to even reach Elizabeth. Then, Rosie's butt would get stuck in the chair when she tried to get up, then after all that, Rosie would be out of breath by the time she got to the door.

Rosie out of  breath -- PERF

Rosie out of  breath -- PERFECT!

This just goes to show how

This just goes to show how lacking in common sense the liberal way is. Three things they are willing to kill for are the right to kill the unborn, take away the guns and keeping faith away from the masses so they may be indoctrinated. And they quote the "constitution" as supporting their ideas but I can't find any of them in there. And before some troll tries with the establishment clause read the second half of the sentence you've so twisted.

Now, when there is an actual right clearly expressed in the document, those can be ignored because they don't like it. Right to bear arms, free speech, and that congress shall pass no law restricting the practice of religion are all clearly defined. The PC, gun control and separation of church and state movements try to ignore that fact.

So, let's get it straight once and for all. Liberal = bastardize constitution and make up rights to fit your agenda and pretend the rights you don't like don't exist.

Conservative = uphold the constitution as it is...Those damn intolerant judges, I bet it's because they're Catholic. Maybe they aren't the product of the failing public school system so they can READ THE DOCUMENT!

Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. Talk sense to a
liberal and he calls you a racist, sexist, biggot, homophobe, denier.

As for separation of church a

As for separation of church and state …

It shocks Americans to discover that until relatively recently, individuals did not choose their own religion. If the king was Catholic, so were you. And if the king converted to become Protestant, so did you. It wasn’t an individual choice. The king (i.e., the state) chose your religion, and you had no say in the matter. Because we have never lived under such a system, it never dawns on us that a state would choose a religion. It simply isn’t anywhere in our collective consciousness. It’s like a blind man hearing about color … he simply doesn’t understand you. The idea of a state forcing citizens to support a religion is so impossible that we’re blind to it.

It was different for the Founding Fathers. That practice was still going on during their times. When they wrote in the amendment that established freedom of religion, it was a relatively new (and radical) concept. When Jefferson wrote his letter and used the words “separation of church and state,” that’s what he was talking about. As it turns out, it has been such a successful and welcome amendment that we now take it completely for granted.

We have forgotten why those words were there in the first place.

It was only a few decades ago that people who had no consciousness of the original need for the amendment began to interpret the “establishment of religion” prohibition. Since they had no awareness of why the clause was there in the first place, they took it to mean that the Founders must have wanted to exclude religion from the public arena. They interpreted it to mean that if the state showed any favoritism for any religion, it would insult everyone else. (To be clear, the Founders never meant any such thing.) Anti-religious zealots pushed that misinterpretation to the extreme. Now, people wrongly use the idea of “separation of church and state” to argue that even the slightest mention of religion would offend someone, so all expressions of religion must be outlawed.

This is what happens when you forget history. 

forget history???

Most young folks were not taught American history. Most of us, I include me, do not know or remember much about the Constitution. I am trying to fix that by my current reading!  Wouldn't it be nice if there were a show on TV like "are you smarter than a 5th grader"? Something like --"Do you know the Constitution better than a frogging foreigner???" "You can win up to $50,000 for answering 5 questions on the Constitution. " Nah, then the networks would be doing their country a service--never happen!

So in Rosie mind there are on

So in Rosie mind there are only supposed to be atheists on the Supremem Court?

Would Ro have the same opinio

Would Ro have the same opinion of a Mormon?

I saw the show today in hospital.  Ro drew some number out of her arse about Catholics on the SCOUS and Joy tried two or three times to correct her and finally mumbled not Catholics, Christians.  Sheesh.

It seems this girl won't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

My guess?

My guess is that Rosie would have an even worse opinion of a Mormon. Remember... in a country founded on religious freedom, where freedom to express religion and practice religion, is protected -- the Mormons never got that chance until well after they were in Utah. They were kicked out of 4 states for crying out loud before settling in Utah. As such, since the LDS church has been the whipping boy religion of many, it would not only be free game, it would be open season...


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

You are right about the histo

You are right about the history of LDS.  My point, not well written is that Ro would have a problem with anyone on the SCOUS who held religious beliefs.  Did she have a problem with JFK being a Catholic president?  Why not just do away with the human factor altogether and let a computer decide major issues? 

Gee, Rosie O'Donnell is anti-

Gee, Rosie O'Donnell is anti-Catholic.  Say it ain't so!  Oh wait, here's some more evidence of her anti-Christian bigotry, courtesy of The Catholic League:

DISNEY/ABC NEEDS TO REIGN ROSIE IN

 On today’s edition of the ABC show, “The View,” the discussion turned to the Supreme Court’s ruling yesterday affirming the partial-birth abortion ban. In an angry tone, Rosie O’Donnell asked, “You know what concerns me? How many of the Supreme Court judges are Catholic, Barbara?” Walters responded, “Five.” O’Donnell: “Five. Five are Catholic. Separation of church and state, America.” Walters then said that when the Catholic justices were vetted, they said they would not vote in a particular way because of their religion. But she then said, “It is interesting they’re Catholic.” After others spoke, Walters said she thought the justices were able to separate their faith from everyday life. To which O’Donnell replied, “From your everyday life but not hopefully from the foundation of our government. Separation of church and state.”

 Catholic League president Bill Donohue addressed this issue today:

 “This is O’Donnell’s eighth attack on Catholics since September. She has said there is no difference between radical Christians and radical Muslims (9-12-06); she has ridiculed the Eucharist (9-28-06); she has falsely claimed that the pope was in charge of policing miscreant priests since the 1980s and did nothing about them (10-2-06); she repeated the lie about the pope again (10-27-06); she has mocked priestly celibacy (2-7-07); she ridiculed the Eucharist again (2-27-07); she mocked Catholic teaching on the Bible and the Virgin Birth (3-26-07); and now she is complaining about too many Catholics on the high court.

 “On December 8, 2006, O’Donnell apologized for offending the Chinese after Chinese-American groups protested the way she ridiculed them the week before. On January 18, 2007, ABC said of ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ star Isaiah Washington’s anti-gay slur, ‘We take this situation very seriously, and his actions are unacceptable and are being addressed.’

 “Accordingly, we are asking Anne Sweeney, Co-Chair Disney Media Networks and President, Disney-ABC Television Group, to demand that O’Donnell apologize to Catholics and that O’Donnell be treated with as much seriousness as was shown Washington.”

 

Folks I am reading "The Rise of America--

Folks  I am reading "The Rise of America"--by one of our bloggers John Diamond. I feel it is a "must" read for anyone who wants to know what the Constitution REALLY says. Nowhere does it address , in those words, "separation of church and state" and hold onto your hat---you can find that exact statement in the Communist constitution. I can't tell you strongly enough--she is wrong. The book is well resaerched and loaded with actual quotes taken from writings of our Founding Fathers.

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STA

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IS IN WHAT COMMUNIST CONSTITUTION?!?!? NOW THAT MAKES SENSE...

Uh -- yeah

It's a true statement. The constitution of the former Soviet Union. Read down to section 13: For the purpose of securing to the workers real freedom of conscience, the church is to be separated from the state and the school from the church, and the right of religious and anti-religous propaganda is accorded to every citizen.

Now, having read that, read the US Constitution. Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

...wow, so I guess Rosie is a

...wow, so I guess Rosie is asserting that murder is a religious "Catholic thing" and thus according to her communist views regarding separation of church and state we should then abolish all murder laws...? Okeydokey, Rosie...

Noooooooooo...

Don't really care what Rosie is trying to say. The bottom line, is there is no such thing as Separation of Church and State in the United States. It does not exist, except in the minds of liberals. Those words only ever appear in the constitution of the [former] Soviet Union, not found anywhere in the US Constitution. Even the people who like to quote it as a line from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson... there is a problem: He had nothing to do with the framing of the US Constitution or any of the Amendments called the Bill of Rights -- he was out of the country at the time.

Murder is illegal, its basis does come back to the Judaic-Christian heritage of this country, and the Ten Commandments. Even the Soviet Union could not escape that one, except in instances where a peasant of the country, threatened the internal "stability" of the government -- then it was okay to murder. Murder is defined as: The unlawful killing of one human being by another, especially with premeditated malice.
So, whether or not Rosie is talking about this or not, is beyond me, but the bottom line is, concerning the "separation of church and state" -- it does not exist in this country by the Constitution. Period.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

I've heard most of that but w

I've heard most of that but was not aware about the USSR constitution - very good to know for future commentary on the matter!

I don't think like Rosie whatsoever, that's for sure...but she's definitely asserting here that murder is a religous thing and therefore should not be part of our law...it's so amazingly stupid on so many levels that it boggles the mind...

amendment 1

This amendment is to protect the people from the government. It illustrates that we are free to create a religion if we so choose. Congress has absolutely no power over us in matters of religion.

In truth....

In truth, the entirety of the Constitution is designed to protect people from the government. The Constitution does not grant power to the federal government, it is designed to limit the amount of power the federal government has.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Further info--

I wish John Diamomd would login and add his tremendous knowledge to this issue. What you say, Mr Bishop is 100% true. The founders  were extremely wide to form the three branches. I forgot which of them said that the Judicial was the "weakest" of the three and it was so by design.

My deep concern is that I am a strong States' rights person and the SCOTUS has been eating away at those rights. I want the term of a Justice to be restricted to ,arbitrarily, 65 years of age. Lord knows they will still be able to exert influence and exercise their kowledge in civilian life.  I know that the real issue behind the Civil War was States' rights. Slavery was the excuse. It is not good PC for me to say that. I will now be attacked by some as a racist, yada yada. But, I hold my ground, it is true.

truthmonger "1936 Constitution of the USSR"

Article 124

"In order to ensure citizen's freedom of conscience, the church in the U.S.S.R. is separated from the State, and the school from the church."

I, for one,  prefer to live under the Constitution of the USA as defined by our founders and not one as falsely described by the fat one. She must have been born in Russia.

Also the Federalist Papers wi

Also the Federalist Papers will tell you exactly what the men who wrote the constitution and the bill of rights meant. It is a must read for anyone that wants to define what the founding fathers were thinking.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

bass -- right on!

The book I am reading takes a lot from the Federalist Papers.

Know why?

The Federalist Papers were not written by Thomas Jefferson, the president the left loves to quote for his line on separation of church and state. As I mentioned previously, Jefferson had absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution, he was out of the country at the time, acting in the capacity of Ambassador (Minister) to France.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Did I mention Jefferson? No.

Did I mention Jefferson? No. The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison, for the most part. John Jay was the first Cheif Justice of the Supreme Court. 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

I know...

I know you didn't mention Jefferson... LOL -- the reason I mentioned Jefferson is due to the fact that liberals enjoy quoting from him, concerning the Constitution and separation of church and state.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

bass n bishop

LOL--the jefferson you both are referring to did not have $100 grand stashed in his icebox.

I can't let Rosie off that easy

I can't let Rosie off that easy------------------------------------------

A lady on Tv quite obese

Her audience she does fleece

And all show long

says things that are wrong

And gets applause from simpering geese!

 Misterbill, you made me smi

 Misterbill, you made me smile at your poem or is it a limerick? 

Seung-Hui Cho

It must be a limerick because when I looked up limerick in the dictionary it said limericks were easy to write and didn't require a lot of skill. I was going to make up one about the person who wrote that definition but I said "forget it".

dear mike chapman,

Ironically Rosie gives the Catholic Church all the credit for this victory over barbarism and inhumanity, when it's really the U. S. Constitution that's triumphant now. Not any person or religion. Our Supremes interpreted the Constitution and determined that no rights are guaranteed anyone to murder an American citizen at the moment of his/her birth. Not Constitutionally or any other way.

Rosie even ignores the clear fact that all people of faith have been vindicated, not only us Catholics. Did that require Catholic judges? Not in America, it didn't. It only required respect for the Constitution and no obligations to special interests such as our country's militant feminists. We all know what Ruth Bader Ginsberg's main concern is, and it's not America or the Constitution. It's feminism and its agenda of abortion on demand. SHE is the justice on this bench most deplorable; installed there by a President and his spouse who are sellouts to the abortion lobby of this country. They can't even HOPE to deny it.

Rosie will; but Rosie's merely a Catholic basher on account of her own moral turpitude, not the Constitution's vital importance to our Law. She merely wishes gays and lesbians could repudiate God in His every earthly manifestation, His all-seeing Eye which is on the sparrow as well as the sinner. Her sins cause her to hate all things Catholic. May God someday bring her to repentence and forgive her.

I agree - but the Catholic c

I agree - but the Roman Catholic church really does deserve a considerable amount of the credit for defending human life on this rock...

Maybe if Rosie called nuns

Maybe if Rosie called nuns "scarf-headed ho's", that would get her fired, because someone might mistakenly think she was talking about Muslim women.....

"scarf-headed ho's"

Motherbelt--I am worried about you.. LOL Good one..

With this gaggle of women--ev

With this gaggle of women--even an innocent baby has no chance.

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

Can someone clear something u

Can someone clear something up for me?  Isn't it correct that Roe vs Wade was never a law, that it was just a judicial decision?  In order to be a law, doesn't Congress have to vote on it? 

There is no right to an abort

There is no right to an abortion in the constitution - if that's what you're getting at...like the right to bear arms...

You are (or were) correct

At one point the Constitution said that the SCOTUS would pass decisions to the executive and legislative branch WHICH THEY DID NOT HAVE TO FOLLOW! I believe the 14th amendment has muddied those awters. I am not a salesman or a publisher or even a close friend of John Diamond but if you buy his book--he addresses theses issues. I have not finished it yet. I am at the cahpter that addresses the SCOTUS and the changes over the years.

Laws are to be created by the legislative branch.

the book is "The Rise of America". I had to order it from Amazon, it was not in any of the local book stores.

misterbill,Gees, I migh

misterbill,

Gees, I might have to get a copy, as I am only 400 or so pages into The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (hey, I just really started it last weekend) and it is beginning to depress the heck out of me.

Mr. Gibbon's life's work, though a history, was also quite prophetic. Eerily so.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.

dave r there is one problem

dave r  there is one problem-- I think you are alot like me--you will get so pissed off when you read the inroads to the destruction of America, it will sadden you.

It also will point out why we need American history and parts of the Constitution taught in our schools again.

Isn't it correct that Roe

Isn't it correct that Roe vs Wade was never a law, that it was just a judicial decision?

Correct, it's not a law, its proponents consider it a "constitutional right", found in the penumbra of (I believe it's) the 4th amendment which talks about privacy. The assumption that it's a right is "rooted" according to the Court that decided it, in the privacy of individuals to make decisions (with their doctor) about their bodies. However, this "theory" doesn't hold true for those who want to practice prostitution, unless the prostitution is sodomy, because that is protected.....now I have myself all confused...good thing I never wanted to be a lawyer.....

A law must be passed by cong

A law must be passed by congress and approved by the president. The courts apply the law. The SCOTUS interprets the law. At least that's the way it's supposed to work. Of course, with the new SP mentality, if they can't get a law passed, they have two options:

1. Work with liberal judges through the courts to backdoor legislation as in gun control and frivolous lawsuits.

2. Do what they want anyway (they can always just say it's Bush's fault if it doesn't work out).

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers

BS

According
to a September 15 , 1996 Bergen Record of New Jersey article, Metropolitan Medical Associates in Englewood, NJ admitted
to performing 1,500 partial birth abortions a year, most on healthy
mothers of healthy babies.

So why do liberals and the media keep reporting this number of 2,000 medically necessary Partial Birth Abortions?

You don't say!

Ironic Bergen-Belsen was Concentration camp in Germany.  See also "passing their chil;dren through the fire to Molech (abortion in the Old Testament) celebrating the god of pleasure.

We are closer to legalizing the murder of born infants than overturning Roe v Wade.

Suppose Rosie stabs her partner in the back of the head before her tongue leaves the birth canal.  Just a thought.

"Bergen-Belsen was Con

"Bergen-Belsen was Concentration camp in Germany"

I've been there. In the entrance room, there is a diorama of what the camp looked like and pictures hung on the walls. Once past the entry building, all that remains of the camp are the mass burial mounds. Some contained 200, others more. And it had an eerie feel to it. I mean, outside the birds were chirping and there was a light breeze. But once inside the walls, it was silent. No birds, no breeze. It was creepy.

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana

Liberal mantas...say it enoug

Liberal mantas...say it enough times by someone known and it can become fact.  Her audience, both studio and at home, probably do not have enough knowlwedge or ablility to check the real facts on their own.  So they "trust" Rosie.  Ask a liberal where they got their facts and they will probably quote some "celebrity".  Why do you think they watch this show in the first place?

Good Example you ask...

Mr. Bishop Says:
April 19, 2007 - 15:43

Don't really care what Rosie is trying to say. The bottom line, is there is no such thing as Separation of Church and State in the United States. It does not exist, except in the minds of liberals.

Rosie isn't dumb, she is ignorant!

“And what I'm saying is, this is a great time for us to look honestly at what we're doing as a society and culture.“  Lou Dobbs 4-17-07

Mr. Bishop

Mr. Bishop, I have to disagree, Rosie IS stupid..ignorance can be fixed.

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER

I have to agree that Rosie Th

I have to agree that Rosie The Mouth is stupid, and she is ignorant. But that's not the bad part... She is stupid and ignorant and proud of it...

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers

Yes. Rosie keeps telling us t

Yes. Rosie keeps telling us that because the percentage is small, we don't need to worry about it.

"DR. CURTIS COOK: Well, even the Alan Guttmacher Institute has estimated that it runs in excess of 2,000 cases a year. And I'm sure that's underreported. It probably more represents five to ten thousand babies a year. So I suppose it depends upon what you define as many. It's a small percentage of total abortions but it's several thousand children a year that will be affected.

GWEN IFILL: Actually those numbers are that 90 percent of abortions occur during the first trimester of pregnancy. Only 1 percent, or depending on how you -- maybe not only -- 1 percent occur after the 20th week of pregnancy which is the kind of procedure we're talking about here. There's a lot debate about those numbers, obviously.

DR. CURTIS COOK: Well, actually the numbers are very consistent. Everyone agrees there's something on the order of 1.3, 1.4 million abortions a year in this country; 1 percent obviously makes up a very small number percentage-wise but you're talking about several thousand cases. So I think several thousand cases is something that the average American would be concerned about." - From a discussion which aired on PBS November 5, 2003.

P.S. Note that Rosie is a bit confused re: the math. She states 0.1%. And on her website, she cites 0.15%. Wonder if she does her own taxes.

Skewed view of Separation of Church and State

Just because 5 of the justices are Catholic, has nothing to do with Separation of Church and State.

Actually, if one's faith is a determining factor whether a Justice can be appointed, wouldn't that be a Separation of Church and State concern?

...it's all just assinine...i

...it's all just assinine...is murder strictly a religous concept?! Do non-religous people therefore support murder? She is such an absolute doofus...

Its like I have said a millio

Its like I have said a million times, its amazing just how fast the left is willing to pitch the second amendment out the window even though its right there. Compared to the Roe vs. Wade, which is bad law, as well as the separation of church and state, based on a letter written by Jefferson that the government should not establish a national religion
Rosie is breathtaking stupid.

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

USA4freedom good job!!!

USA4freedom  good job!!! The only mention of separation of church and state was, as you state, in a letter from Jefferson to a minister. It was not to exclude religion from the state, it was said to assure the minister that the state could not interfere with his religion.

sort of like how people claim

sort of like how people claim the 2nd amendment grants unconditional, individual right to keep and bear arms, when in reality guns may be regulated and prohibited if they have no "...reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia"  (US v. Miller)

2nd Amendment:

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

Oh goody, little Syggie pooh

Oh goody, little Syggie pooh is back.

You never answered me as far as I know yesterday about your stance on abortion and partial bith abortion... and I was up til late on here mister cut and run and hide.

ANSWER me NOW!

You went on all day about this, even after I sent you a ton of material to read via a link.

Militia:  "The whole bo

Militia:  "The whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service." According to websters. Kinda sounds like the militia is a collective of citizens dont it? US vs. Miller was a case involving a sawed off shotgun. Not "guns" as a whole. Get an education, get a clue.   

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Syg..show me in the Constitut

Syg..show me in the Constitution where it sayes, "Seperation of Church and State". Show me those words in the US Constitution.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

I don’t usually respond to

I don’t usually respond to trolls, if they just drive by and drop a bomb and run. I notice that there are a lot of questions for you below. So what do you have to say? The 2nd amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, *** the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.*** Now pull out of you’re a$$ where is states a woman’s right to kill her unborn child, where it states why a cross cant be placed on public property, where it states that a child cant pray in school. Show me were it states that a persons property can be taken and handed over to some one else so that it can bring in more taxes????? All of these were extrapolated over and over, yet when it states:…*** the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed*** some how that does not mean what it says. I think you should join Rosie’s think tank.

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day

Syg cites precedence

Here Syg cites a case of legal precedence. Let's realize then, the importance of yesterday's judgment, upholding the ban on partial birth abortion.

It may seem insignificant overall. In fact, though, a new precedent was set, of great importance. Now we are assured that abortion rights are subject to change and even hopefully, repeal. Before there was scant precedent for ANY Supreme Court action that redresses Roe v. Wade. We'll begin to see this plainly as soon as the ultra-left feminists unite to bring back partial-birth abortions. They have no choice. From now on for abortion rights lawyers, it's do or die.

Thanks, Syg; for making us aware of this.

Not in this thread

Not in this thread--go be obnoxious somewhere else!

Isn't religion a protected

Isn't religion a protected class? So if she is advocating prohibitting someone from serving on the SCOTUS based solely on their religious beliefs isn't she advocating discrimation?

BTW, Who are the idiots in the audience clapping?

I'm sure the tub of lard woul

I'm sure the tub of lard would've objected to the abolitionist movement of the 1840s and 1850s since is was led by northern Quakers and other northern churches--no mixing of religion and politics you know.

Athiest Judges?

So do we need to find Judges who are avowed Athiests to put on the Supreme Court?  When is someone going to pound the reality of what the Separation of Church and State really means into the head of this ignorant B?

Here Here Chasvs.   I admir

Here Here Chasvs.   I admire your self control on the B word also!

As if an atheist could ever

As if an atheist could ever get past confirmation.

16 Democrats Rosie the Witch

16 Senate Democrats Rosie the Witch who voted for the ban...including your fearless majority leader Harry Reid (a Mormon)....who now is upset about this decision, pointing to big bad Alito...

Flip-Flopper Delux!

Eat it and weep Rosie!

Rosie's Reich III

Why is Rosie allowed to spew her hatred of Catholics?  Because she can.

Christians are less likely to physically retaliate against speech (or cartoons), regardless of Rosie's applauded remarks to the contrary.

The fact Rosie has an adoring audience is a major tragedy in Western thought.

Why is Rosie allowed to spew

Why is Rosie allowed to spew her hatred of Catholics?

Because people like you actually still care about what she says.

We care what Rosie says becau

We care what Rosie says because she is an influence on others with her ignorant rants.  People actually believe/agree with her.

“And what I'm saying is, this is a great time for us to look honestly at what we're doing as a society and culture.“  Lou Dobbs 4-17-07

Yeah so what?  Somehow it's

Yeah so what?  Somehow it's your duty to protect them? 

People are stupid.  If you want to proclaim yourself the protector of ignorant Americans, you better get cracking b/c you have a lot of work to do.

I have already begun, you inc

I have already begun, you included.

face piles of trials with smiles

another fearless member of th

another fearless member of the 101st Fighting Keyboard Division, defending America one meaningless post at a time.

Yeah Syg, we love you and we

Yeah Syg, we love you and we are here to help you.  As difficult as that may be, but we won't give up.

face piles of trials with smiles

101st Fighting Keyboard Division? - Hi hater

"101st Fighting Keyboard Division"

Hello, hater.   Still using your favorite phrases, I see.

Wow RJ,We both posted the sam

Wow RJ,

We both posted the same thing.

Hater indeed, he isn't even tricky...slipped in again, must not like to last long on here.

Of course I said hi hater right from the get go..he is soooo obvious!

Still hasn't answered me...lol

Ha. That's funny, BT.

Ha.  That's funny, BT.  We both caught it immediately.   Yeah, I've been addressing him as hater right along, too.   He thinks he's slick but he's always been obvious.   ;^>

RJ, BT....I notice he never e

RJ, BT....

I notice he never even once denied it....so typical.

The slap down yesterday was epic.

What it is it with these trolls that they keep coming back?

Hi Blonde

Hi Blonde.   I've got that "bomb Iran" song stuck in my head now.

Nah, hater only occasionally denies it.  He usually just keeps going until he gets booted.   It would be interesting to know why they keep coming back.   Some possibilities:

1) Challenge: They understand that this is the best place for debate.

2) Ideological: They hate that this place exists

3) Masochistic:  a pathological need to be slapped silly  (rhayes, are you reading this?)

4) Financial:  They're being paid

5) Sociopathic:  A need to control

Any more?

Yeah...

6) Stupidity: They just plain don't get it...


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Good point, Bishop.I particul

Good point, Bishop.

I particularly love it when they try to argue with YOU!

Hey RJ,It's been running thro

Hey RJ,

It's been running through my head today too...."Bomb Iraaaaaan".  :D

Well,  I'm w/ you on 2 through 4. 

1) Challenge....they get their head's handed to them continually.  Sheesh, Mobi didn't go one post before changing the "terms of the debate" and trying to call me a "tomato" last night.  I feel like an idiot that I called him an "@sshole"...but, hey, sometimes I just have to call them like I see them.....

5)  Need to control....they can't control their own mouth's (kinda like ROD), much less any discussion.

Do you really think "syg" is hater....I notice the time on the board is 36 weeks...a little long for the hateful one to emerge, says I.  But a haterette, or a clone, perhaps.

Bomb Iraaaaaan......

No doubt about it, Blonde

Oh, no doubt about it. I was already positive, but the "101st" comment sealed it. That's an old favorite of hater's.

 101st Fighting Keyboard Div

 101st Fighting Keyboard Division

Definitely got to be hater...or his clone.

Yawn. We're back in 2005 or 0

Yawn. We're back in 2005 or 06 again. At least when the tards come back, at least they stop recycling the same tired cliches.

no you doofus

It's her perfect right to CARE. You asked why she cared about what La Corpulenta says.

You seem to think nobody ought to care. But why? She has her gay-lesbian agenda and wishes Catholics would just slide off the face of the earth. Which frankly, I don't want to do. Rosie can ESAD.

"People are stupid.&quot

"People are stupid." Syg, you go along ways to proving that. Ignorant Americans? You have already proven that some are more ignorant than others. Everytime you open your mouth, you demonstrate ignorance and lack of education. That, or your IQ is the same as Rosies.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

bass,Why, that would mean t

bass,

Why, that would mean that Syggie is, in fact, brain dead!

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.

Dave, Right On Dude!!Save a S

Dave, Right On Dude!!

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Wrong

I care what she says because other liberal lemmings follow her.  As a recovering Catholic, I've got my disagreements with that church, but someday they'll come for me, and there'll be nobody there to speak up.

Nobody follows rosie.  What

Nobody follows rosie.  What a silly assertion.  She's on a tv show watched almost exclusively by housewives with nothing to do while the rest of us are working.

Still waiting for yyour answe

Still waiting for your answer.

Syg, your Mom was a housewife

Syg, your Mom was a housewife, what she watched influenced her and you.  And look at you now!

face piles of trials with smiles

No she wasn't.  Aside from 3

No she wasn't.  Aside from 3 months when I was first born, my mother worked as a preschool teacher for my entire childhood. 

See, now that's the problem with assumptions.

Syg, so now we are getting so

Syg, so now we are getting somewhere.  Since it was your preschool teachers who raised you, they are the ones who were your early influences? 

face piles of trials with smiles

Clairvoyant me

Your clarification was exactly my assumption.

What's your point

LOL...Obviously you were left

LOL...Obviously you were left behind in your schooling.

You are still at preschool level.

Poor baby.

....still waiting for my answer on your stance Syg, you can run, but you can't hide.

BT be easy on Syg, if you rea

BT be easy on Syg, if you read between the lines, he was a"latch-key" kid.  Mom went back to work when he was only 3 months old and he was "raised" by whatever preschool teacher he happened to be with for "all his life".  Not a real nuturing or consistent upbringing.  Don't suppose any of those preschool teachers were liberal do ya?

face piles of trials with smiles

Help me out here

Is it possible (by definition) for someone to be a "preschool teacher"?

Is that like being a prenuptial husband?  An added bonus?

Preschool teacher: see more at Babysitter

Preschool teacher: High Schoo

Preschool teacher: High School drop-out who learned to change diapers on younger siblings.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Short-bus Syggie.

Syggie,

Did the bus you rode to school on seem a little shorter than the buses your friends got to ride to school on?

Just wonderin'.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.

ROTFLMAO

Good one!! He sat too close to the exhaust pipe!!!

School bus

Burned his lips on the tailpipe trying to blow up the bus.

Riled, Damn!, that is f

Riled,

Damn!, that is funny!

-laughing so hard I can't even see anymore!

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.

I had to wait til now to post

I had to wait til now to post I have been laughing so hard at all the posts!

Love you guys... (for those of you in Rio Linda that is a generic term for everybody)!

Oh really

Your pompous retort towards our wives and mothers and sisters as "housewives" (I didn't know housewife a pejorative) with nothing to do, does nothing but trivialize the views of a large group of Americans.  Thanks for your logical analysis.

RO...Thank you for that post.

RO...

Thank you for that post.

Let's substutute African Amer

Let's substutute African American for Catholic in O'Donnell's statement. Exactly how fast would her fat backside be kicked out of Hollywood???

Rosie's rants

In a heartbeat...

I'm personally opposed to the

I'm personally opposed to the killing of lawless, leftist, feminist dingbats like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Rose O'Donnell and Barbara Walters.  However, because I will not impose my own religious beliefs on others, I am pro-choice on the killing of such lawless, leftist, feminist dingbats.  Of course, my position is not "pro-killing" such fools.  I am merely pro-choice on the matter.  Given the respect of Ginsburg, O'Donnell and Walters for the "separation of church and state", I am certain that Ginsburg, O'Donnell and Walters agree with me and would not impose their own "values" on those who want to kill such lawless, leftist, feminist dingbats.

Pro choice = Pro abortion.

Those names you just dropped are very much in favor of imposing their values on all of us.  They would not otherwise demand our taxes pay for the murders they view as sacrament.

I do have a dog in this hunt.  If I'm supposed to shut up on the matter, the government shouldn't force me to pay for it with my taxes.

What about separation of your

What about separation of your head from your rectal cavity, Rosie? 

then she would

then she would  have no place to speak from-----------------

O’DONNELL: If men could g

O’DONNELL: If men could get pregnant abortion would be a sacrament.

Okay. That at least explains how Rosie got here.

But seriously, I do not know much about Rosie's educational background, but it seems to me that she might seriously consider seeking a tuition refund.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.-
Neal Boortz.

Dave,Maybe so...from preschoo

Dave,

Maybe so...from preschool!

According to her bio, Rosie i

According to her bio, Rosie is a college dropout. At the age of 20 she decided that comedy was the career for which she was best suited.

And for the record, I believe Rosie has "issues" with the male gender overall. She's not just a feminist lesbian. I believe she hates men. I don't believe her lesbianism is a result of any sort of biological anamoly. She is an angry person. She was a young teen when her mother died. I'd be interested to know what her relationship was with her father and whether she'd ever been molested. She fits the pattern. Too bad that she decided to put herself in the public arena in order to compensate for her insecurities. She will eventually self-destruct if she can't exorcise her personal demons.

"If men could get preg

"If men could get pregnant abortion would be a sacrament."

What? A sacrament only exists in the Christian faith. It is a rite that mediates divine grace, constituting a sacred mystery or a sacrament is an outward, visible sign that conveys an inward, spiritual grace.

How exactly would abortion be a sacrament?

It's Not about Catholic

Rosie doesn't care that they are Catholic. What upsets her and her ilk is a belief in God. How does she come up with this ridicuous analogies about "separation of church and state".

It's up there with moronic statements like, "this is the first time in history that fire has melted steel".

Really? What do they melt steel with Rosie?

And I am increasingly disappointed in Hasslebeck, who sits there and says nothing when Rosie makes such asinine comments.

Rosie has a double standard.

Rosie has a double standard.  Sober on air slur from Imus good, drunk Mel Gibson in a humiliating moment evil, drunk on air Danny Devito loveable.

Okay maybe I have always miss

Okay maybe I have always missed something here but just where in the constitution does it mention "seperation of church & state"? 

Amendment I 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

I am not a lawyer or a Supreme Court Justice but I interpret this to means, unlike Mother England, Congress will not create a "National Religion" (i.e. Church of England) and instead everyone has the right to practice whatever religion or lack of religion they wish. 

Do we elect only Athiests to the bench - God Helps us!

Lead, follow .... or become a Democrat!

I'm surprised that conserva

I'm surprised that conservatives take Rosie so seriously. We liberals see her (or at least I do) as that strange aunt who sits at the table and rants incoherently. We just smile and pass her another piece of pie.

Nonsense, vrava

Nonsense.  Her idiocy is taken seriously by many leftists.  We even have some on this board who agree with her.   All the women on the View panel take her seriously, as does the audience. 

Show me a major Democrat who has indicated they think she's the "crazy aunt." 

They may agree with her, bu

They may agree with her, but I don't think they take her seriously as a political thinker. It's not like she writes political books. She's on an entertainment show for goodness sake. She's just loud and outspoken.

Show me a major democrat who is even aware of what she's been talking about lately. I've seen nary a mention of her on liberal blogs. I think she's just positioning herself as a less vicious version of Ann Coulter, drumming up controversy and hype for The View. I'm sure she's done wonders for their ratings.

They agree with her but don't

They agree with her but don't take her seriously 

You're trying to have it both ways...saaaay, are you a liberal? 

"...less viscious version of Ann Coulter?"  Now, that is a stupid statement on two counts.   Coulter's IQ has to be at least double that of Rosie, and Rosie is the embodiment of vicious.  Many people who think Coulter is viscious are just suffering from an inability to get her jokes...they go right over their heads.....could be you fit into that category.

Tell me something "vicious" that Coulter said and I'll explain it for you.

Ann Coulter

Libs can't handle staring into their own foolishness when they read Ann Coulter.

It doesn't make me foolish, b

It doesn't make me feel foolish, but it does make me feel a little icky.

Ah, you guys keep me on my

Ah, you guys keep me on my toes. I like this site!

What I'm trying to say is that, yes, some folks especially in the audience may agree with what she says, but I don't think she is considered some great liberal thinker. No one turns to her for explanations of complex political theories or well-thought-out policy examinations.

Yeah, I think Coulter has a higher IQ than Rosie too. And I do realize that she's a comedian, but come on, you have to admit she's pretty vicious in her attacks. That's her trademark.

I'll give you a couple of quotes that she intends as jokes, but which are also pretty vicious :

"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."

"The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose
other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible
explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to
see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle."

Well...

I wouldn't say that she is vicious in her attacks really. My personal opinion on Ann Coulter is that she just doesn't care what liberal whack jobs think of her, and I LOVE that about her. She is going to give her opinion, and people can live with it. I love when she says things that piss off a liberal website, or liberal guest... it just shows that she really doesn't care about their opinion of her personally.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

I think she would be a lot

I think she would be a lot of fun to hang out with personally. I certainly don't agree with 80% of what she says, and I rather wish she would stop calling people faggots, but she stands up for herself and makes things interesting. But, come on, she's vicious. That's what we love about her.

You know...

What I have discovered, having a gay brother, is that the only people who are offended by terms such as that, are people who are just plain insecure altogether. I am not saying that you are, I am merely saying that my brothers and I call my gay brother a faggot all the time, and he laughs and calls us names. It's how it works... the word, is just a word. It cannot hurt you, anymore then my spitting at my computer monitor right now, would hurt you. It's ridiculous to worry about what one is going to say, or how someone is going to say it because they're just a bunch of sounds, rolled together to make a word. Whoopity do.

:)


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

I agree with you to a point

I agree with you to a point. The word itself doesn't bother me, and if she came up to me and called me a faggot, I wouldn't give a damn. But I wish she wouldn't legitimize rediculing a person for their sexuality. She uses the word as an insult. She never calls people she likes faggots. You love your brother and don't mean the word to be hurtful. I just know that she's a role model for many, and gays, especially young ones in rural towns, have such a tough row to hoe as it is. Bullying is a big problem for young gays, and it doesn't take much for a taunt of "faggot" to turn into something far worse.

Indeed

Still, you have to remember, it's just a word. If someone is using a word to elicit a prescribed response, ignore it, and just don't worry about it. That's all I really am going to say anymore on this particular subject. The bottom line is -- words can only hurt you, if you let them.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Or unless the words inflame t

Or unless the words inflame the situation and lead to physical or emotional violence or intimidation.

Back to my point

The problem is, you just took it back to my original point: it only hurts if you let it. If someone were to call all members of the military, especially infantry, special operations forces, Rangers, etc. a bunch of baby-killing whackos... I just shrug my shoulders. It shows more about their mentality, then it does my personality. They could call me anything they wanted, and it, frankly, wouldn't bother me as much. They're words... if someone wants to get into a fight over someone else calling them a name, then that's (frankly) their own personal issue, and most likely, their own insecurities responding to the word.

Again, it all goes back to the receiving person's ability to remember that it's just a word.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

That's a tough thing when y

That's a tough thing when you're a 13 year old boy surrounded by a group of larger kids calling you a fag. And you bet those kids are insecure, but they aren't the one throwing the first punch. Coulter, Imus, all those things, no they aren't really hurting anyone. But, when you take it down to a personal level at a school, then it becomes trouble.

I just fear that Coulter and others might make it a tiny bit easier for those bullies to do their thing. I don't hear her making racist comments, so I just wish she'd cut out the gay insults too.

True

To a point, I would have to agree... it is a tough thing to a 13-year old. However, that usually goes back to the raising of the child by the parents. If the parents taught you to not worry about what other kids said, then it wouldn't matter.

A great example: I've had very hairy arms since I was about 6 or 7. From early on, I received the calls of "Monkeyboy", "Apeman", "Gorillaboy", etc. For the first little while, I was visibly upset by it, and they used it more. When I talked to my father about it, he told me the same thing(s) I just said. They're doing it to get a reaction... they're just words... just ignore them.

Oddly enough, the name calling stopped. Where kids are concerned, you have to know what to say, and when to say it to them. All kids will learn that a word is just a word, and to simply ignore it. In essence, no matter how smart a child might be, all kids are stupid. None of them have the brains God gave a gnat. They think they know everything, but they don't. We were all like this growing up, I can pretty much guarantee it. So a couple of kids make fun of someone else... you bet it happens. I know it happens. The best thing to do, is teach your children as young as possible that words don't hurt you, unless you let them.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

And that's where it gets ev

And that's where it gets even more tragic. Many many of these kids can't go to their parents. Do you know how many homeless gay teenagers we had in Houston (where I worked at the local gay counseling center)? They had told their parents that they were gay and asked for help... and the parents disowned them and kicked them out of the house. It isn't always that drastic, but many, many of these kids can't go to their parents for help and can't depend on them to defend them and make them feel ok about who they are. That's why they need people like us to understand, watch their backs, and help them get the minimum level of self esteem they need to get by.

Coulter and "faggot"

She didn't call Edwards a faggot.  She said, making a joke out of an incident a TV actor had just had, "If I were to call him a faggot, I'd have to go to rehab."   The actor had called someone a faggot and then went to "rehab" to atone for his sins.  Coulter was making fun of liberals who go to rehab as cure for anything they say or do that's not PC.

By the way, have you seen the YouTube video of Edwards prissily fussing with his hair and licking his lips to make them glossy?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Esweetness%2Dlight%2Ecom%2Farchive%2Fann%2Dcoulter%2Dmakes%2Da%2Djoke%2Dthe%2Dnation%2Dtrembles

But of course

I wasn't even responding to any sort of specific usage of the word faggot, I was merely making the point that it's just a word, and it only hurts someone, or bothers someone, if they let it.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

I was referring to her call

I was referring to her calling Gore a "total fag." It was a light hearted moment, and that particular thing didn't bother me too much... but I just wish she'd be a bit careful in that area.

v,Why should she be "a b

v,

Why should she be "a bit careful about it"?

She baits the liberals, just as the liberals come onto this board to bait the conservatives.

You seem to be reasonable, so I won't flame you.

But don't you see it's exactly the same thing?

It's all done for  a reaction.

Thank you. Yeah, I came he

Thank you. Yeah, I came here because I don't really care to read blogs that just reinforce opinions I already hold. I want to be at a place where I can be challenged to see if my opinions are correct or not, and to change them if needed. So far I haven't been flamed by anyone, which reflects well on the members of this community.

And I certainly know that she does everything for a reaction and whatnot. And just about everything she says is harmless, and she doesn't appear to go after anyone weak (the mistake Imus made), but having worked with gay youths who have gone through hell in their lives, I try to stand up against anyone using sexuality as an insult. She hasn't crossed the line in my mind, but she's come a bit close. I don't think she's a bad person, so I just hope she minds herself in this area.

Rosie doesn't need to be a co

Rosie doesn't need to be a complex thinker in order to be speaking for (or with) a large segment of the left.  Much of what she says is echoed by other pundits and Democrat politicans.  She just says it more stupidly.

Ok, I smiled at the first Coulter joke, so I must be vicious, too. 

As I remember it, the McVeigh line was part of a discussion about the traitorous behavior of the NYT.    She also said something about just the reporters being in the building when it happened.

I don't recall the second statement, but it doesn't appear to be a joke.  It appears to be part of an analysis of why the Democrats have behaved so badly throughout this conflict.  

That would be as follows:  everything the left has done from the very beginning has had the effect of encouraging the enemy, which gives them "aid and comfort."   Since it would be bad, politically, for the Democrats and the left if America wins in Iraq, then it follows that they must also hope that those bad things will happen to our soldiers.

The Democrat attitude toward the troops has always been hypocritical.  We've gone through many battles with liberals on this board over what they call "supporting the troops."  

"Did we think Kyoto would [reduce global warming] when we signed it? . . . Hell no!" -Al Gore

OK, "speaking with&quo

OK, "speaking with" a segment of the left I can accept. She's no Rush, O'Reilly, or Franken though.

But yeah, joking about those reporters being killed is pretty vicious I think.

And, yeah, the second quote wasn't a joke. I'm not really arguing about the Democrats stance(s) on the war, just that the quote itself was vicious. Just trying to establish that she isn't exactly a Care Bear.

You're still missing Coulter's points

You're still missing her points.   The NYT crack is about the paper and the reporters putting our troops in danger by constantly undermining what they are trying to accomplish.  She's suggesting a quid pro quo. 

The second quote is an extension of that. 

No, I understand why she sa

No, I understand why she said them and what she meant, but quid pro quo in this case is rather on the vicious side. The only point I'm trying to make is that she doesn't pull any punches.

I don't see her as nuts. I

I don't see her as nuts. I just don't agree with everything she says. I just don't think she fully thinks out her ideas before she says them.

Besides, where else can I go? It's not like the Republicans really cater to atheist gays.

where else to go?

Atheist gays always expect to be catered to.

But some can write good music. Some can make you laugh too. Rosie isn't talented in either of these. Her slot is being disgusting. (Pun not so bad.)

Haha, I have to be careful

Haha, I have to be careful of my word choice here. Let me put it this way... I don't feel as if many republican politicians represent me. I know plenty of republicans who have my back, but I don't have faith in a lot of the politicians. Dems too for that matter.

I don't think Rosie is entirely untalented. I rather enjoyed her turn in Nip/Tuck last year for example.

You're right

Yeah, Rosie's not entirely untalented... I'll bet she can hold the floor down really well in case gravity suddenly reversed itself.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

She would make really good

She would make really good hot air balloon ballast, of course once you let her go you're looking at a 9-G vertical ascent.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Rosie

Rosie's ignorance is astounding. Her arguments are flawed beyond belief.  Her most glaring error in logic, IMO, is her constant misuse of cause and effect. She jumps quickly to illogical conclusions ( based, of course, on false permises). She is an embarrassment to thinking women everywhere. The fact that she is giving commentary on national t.v. ( news show or not) is a disgrace to the nation. And we wonder why so many of our young people can't think.  She's a product of our public schools ( Commack, N.Y.). They failed to teach her thinking skills and A.B.C. is failing in its responsibility to broadcast responsibly.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

A big red nose

But what would she do for a CloneDyke bar?

Oh, I agree completely. Th

Oh, I agree completely. That's why I don't take her seriously. I really don't think a lot of people do.

And why shouldn't I be trusted? What have I done?

I would like Rosie to be my guest---

I would like Rosie to be my guest---at an abattoir!!!!

I think....

You know... I would love to be a guest on The View -- it would almost be as fun as having Ann Coulter there.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

That's French Morticia!Never

That's French Morticia!

Never seen a pig bleed out

Elizabeth finally did a good

Elizabeth finally did a good job holding her own.

Rosie is mentally ill!

This  Supreme Court decision

This  Supreme Court decision is about saving the lives of the partially born. Does Rosie, the great protector of children, condone partial-birth abortion? She hates Catholics, she hates the Supreme Court, she hates America --who else does this ignoramus hate, the unborn?

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Absolutely

Rosie was totally bummed about her sacrament being taken away from her.  We should note that women typically leave the abortionist much happier (singing, dancing) than when they came in.  There must be something very joyful that happens when the high priest raises his knife to a child of God.

Rosie, what about Article VI?

Hey Rosie, try reading the Constitution. I refer you to Article VI, paragraph 3:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of
the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial
Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be
bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no
religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office
or public Trust under the United States.

The Constitution specifically outlaws keeping anyone out of office based on their religious beliefs, period.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

***Note: I had to correct my Roman numerals. I originally wrote XI, "11", when I meant VI, meaning "6".

Rosie O'Doorknob hates Cathol

Rosie O'Doorknob hates Catholics, Evangelical Christians, everyone's else's right  to be heard, guns, when they're not protecting her, her 'wife', and her tribe of adopted kids,  and anyone who doesn't think like she does.  One thing we do know, Rosie will never need to worry about having an abortion.   No chance of her ever getting pregnant.  Otherwise she might change her mind.  Just a thought.

I'm a democrat, but Rosie's j

I'm a democrat, but Rosie's just ridiculous. Rosie's not very bright if she thinks the justices being Catholic represents a violation of the separation of church & state.

two things:1)Rosie's a lesb

two things:

1)Rosie's a lesbian. She'll never have the chance at an abortion (unless she was stupid enough to get artificially inseminated). Poor girl

2)There's no such thing as separation of church and state in America.

rosie's not very bright ?

Dear balboar --

YOU aren't bright at all if you're a Democrat. I say that with all due respect and with no malicious intent. Get yourself out of that disgraced party. Take stock of yourself and flee for your own self respect. I promise you I'll be your friend, but come out of the darkness.

NRZ

I am in the NO ROSIE ZONE...NRZ.

Why are we focusing on this uneducated woman who really has nothing to say? It is hard to believe that anyone ever found her "funny."

I am female and I have had ENOUGH of Rosie to last a lifetime. Please, let's discuss people and issues that matter.

Re-entering the NRZ.

I've finally put it all toget

I've finally put it all together... and come up with this...

All American Liberals are Communists. They are enemies of the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

____________________________________________________

"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine

And Ruth Bader Ginsburg and

And Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter sounds like they might be Jewish, Rosie.  That would be ANOTHER violation of Church and State.  Ya gotta keep an eye on this stuff.

Rosie really needs to be more

Rosie really needs to be more concerned about the Episcopalians.

Religious affiliations of all Supreme Court Justices

And for the sake of redundancy:

A more comprehensive list

Rosie: Do you find it satisfying to know that the women who believe the things you say are probably less educated than a turnip?

Thank you, QueenMum.  See wh

Thank you, QueenMum.  See what we mean?!  Those rabid, activist Episcopalians have dominated the Supreme Court for the last two hundred years!

So, apparently, in order to a

So, apparently, in order to appease the Rosie The Mouth crowd, a prerequisite for being a government official, of any kind, is that you have to be an Athiest. If you have no religion, then you have no conflict... BTW, does anyone know what religion she is (besides worshiping at the altar of the Great God Moron)?

The Closed Mind Builds Strong Barriers

Why does she even get quoted at all???

Rosie is a comedian ( i use the term loosly) who apparently doesn't have the ability to understans the most basic concepts that are the core of the U.S. Constitution. The apex of her intellectual thinking is apparently:

1) Religion bad

2) Conservatives bad

Why do people even care what she has to say. Don Imus offered far superior insight and intelligence than she.

Rosie is, in fact, dumber tha

Rosie is, in fact, dumber than two sacks of hammers! I have never seen anyone so ill informed or stupid in the entirety of all my born days!

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.