Media theories certainly do change. In light of ABC’s aggressive promotion of the danger of global warming and the liberal solutions the network has embraced, I thought it might be a good idea to consider the ‘70s-era threat of global cooling.
My parents recently unearthed a time capsule that they created in 1977 for the birth of my sister Kimberly. Included in the assorted memorabilia of the time was a March '77 edition of Readers Digest. An article by Samuel W. Matthews, entitled "What’s Happening To Our Climate," wondered whether "we are entering another ice age?" Additionally, a graph showing the Earth’s cooling and warming throughout history is accompanied by this ominous caption [All emphasis added]:
"This chart illustrates the dominant fact about Earth's past climate: It was colder....Over the last century, air temperatures have ranged from somewhat above today’s mean, resulting in an abnormally warm and beneficent climate. Is this unusual cycle coming to an end? Does an icy future loom ahead? Nobody knows for sure."
Abnormally warm and beneficent climate? Could global warming save us from an ice age?
Early in the article, which is actually condensed from a November 1976 National Geographic, Matthews noted an overall global climate drop that began in 1940:
"What is going on with the climate? Since 1940, there has been a distinct drop, about half a degree Fahrenheit, in average global temperature. That seems small, but it has caused significant changes. England’s annual growing season, for example, shrank by nine or ten days between 1950 and 1966. In the northern tier of the U.S. Midwest, summer frosts again occasionally damage crops. Sea ice has returned to Iceland’s coasts after more than 40 years of virtual absence. Glaciers in Alaska and Scandinavia begun advancing again. Yet, oddly, in the eastern United States, western Soviet Union, and much of Europe, the winters of 1973 through 1975 were the warmest in decades."
Much of the piece seems to view any (possibly) man-made warming, such as temperature increases mentioned in the last sentence of the above excerpt, as a good sign, something that might prevent the coming ice age. Later on, Matthews discussed how the (then) coming cooling would affect the beneficial warming that had been occurring:
"The climatic trend changed once again around the mid-19th century. The northern temperate zone grew markedly warmer; indeed, the century from 1875 to 1975 is now regarded by some as one of the warmest in 4000 years. In this time the industrial age boomed, and world population more than doubled. Farming and fishing expanded to keep up with food needs; Canada’s wheat line inched a hundred miles north. But this period of climate, which our grandfathers and fathers came to regard as normal, is now recognized by scientists to have been abnormally warm and beneficent. What will happen to our food output if there is a return to the more truly normal, cooler climate? Are we now at the end of a cycle?"
So, perhaps those readers who have young children, or are about to be parents, should place the current issue of Newsweek in a time capsule for their children. Then, when these youngsters come of age (and might perhaps be dealing again with global cooling), they can learn how the media spun global warming.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.
















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
I was in the 2nd grade in '77
April 20, 2007 - 09:59 ET by InfoJunkieI was in the 2nd grade in '77, and I remember all through elementary school many teachers talking about global cooling and that there would be an ice age by the time I was 30. Six years into my 30's and I want to sue someone for the Arctic Cat I bought and can't even use!!!
Just watch for the ULTIMATE PYRAMID SCHEME INC., Al Gore is the CEO.
It's the sun stupid!!!
I am waiting for the all-liberal SUICIDE PROTEST!!!
Global Cooling
April 20, 2007 - 10:18 ET by allanfThe "Coming Ice Age" of the seventies received nothing like the full scale propagada assult that "Global Warming" had acheived. The propaganda has affected US Supremet Court descisions with "courageous" justices seeking aprobation form the editorialists of the New York Times declaring carbon dioxide a pollutant. Soon to be Dr. Al Gore will likely be a Nobel laureate come the fall. In California, the new CARB board will have a stranglehold on the econonmy.
This is serious stuff. It shows the effectiveness of propaganda. When you repeart something often enough, people start to believe it. Just ask an average person if there were ever any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
The propaganda assult is dangerous.
I'm sure the point has been m
April 20, 2007 - 10:33 ET by sunandsteelI'm sure the point has been made repeatedly here, but I'm going to make it again. The media and lefties in general seem to operate with this "1984" mentality in which we are all supposed to believe what they say now, no matter how it may contradict what they have said before. If, say in the next 5 years or so, the warming trend turns to a cooling trend (and it will eventually), it will be the same hysteria, just a different "enemy". And somehow it will be America's, Republican's, and George W. Bush's fault.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
Propaganda
April 20, 2007 - 11:07 ET by allanfIt fascinates me that supposedly sophisticated and well educated residents of New York City uncritically swallow this nonsense. Yet "hicks" from the middle of the country prove more skeptical.
Tough New York business men, who wouldn't trust a John Kerry to keep his word in a business, sing his praises as a politician and voted form him in 2004.
New Yorkers think they have the brains ...; Very strange.
Maybe us "hicks" ou
April 20, 2007 - 11:15 ET by sunandsteelMaybe us "hicks" out here in the country can more easily see the effects of weather and climate rather than someone who is stuck in a big city where the only nature they see is on Discovery Channel.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
Some commentary
April 20, 2007 - 12:33 ET by UnsaneBeing from Texas...I love the tag-line. :-) And the earlier 1984 reference!
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
I'm from Texas too. :-D Tex
April 20, 2007 - 13:03 ET by sunandsteelI'm from Texas too. :-D
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
The lefties have really defin
April 20, 2007 - 11:15 ET by mikejThe lefties have really defined their global warming issue well this time. They have framed it so that any change in any weather pattern is the cause. That's why whenever there is a story about record cold temp's, then it falls right in line with their global warming fundamentalist beliefs.
Too hot? Global warming! Too cold? Global warming! A lot of rain? Global Warming! Not to hot, not to cold? Global warming! High winds? Global warming! Tornado's? Global warming! Hurricanes? Global warming! Cleveland Indians season opener against the Mariners cancelled? Global warming!
I personally like to use the
April 20, 2007 - 11:24 ET by sunandsteelI personally like to use the "global warming" argument for everything in my life; guitar out of tune = global warming, no more soda at the house = global warming, shoelace broke = global warming. I mean it's getting to the point where it is that absurd, so why not laugh at the goobers who believe this nonsense.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.com)
One of the founders of GreenP
April 20, 2007 - 11:27 ET by GalvanicOne of the founders of GreenPeace left that organization because its hierarchy had been infiltrated by socialists and other political special interest groups, with the result that their political agenda got ironed onto the ecological one.
This is mostly a post-Cold War phenomenon, because the Left needed a cause to attach to once the USSR and Communist East Europe collapsed. The Left uses the ecological issues as cover for wealth re-distribution schemes like Kyoto, where "developed nations" face heavy restrictions and reductions, and the "developing world" get the benefit.
It may have collapsed because
April 20, 2007 - 13:51 ET by Right2thePointIt may have collapsed because of Regans intervention , but it never died the death it deserved. Putin is giving it CPR right now and they are still playing on the world stage as a spoiler stick in your eye kind of guy. Don't put the bear down for the count, it lives and breaths.