So does this mean that NARAL and NOW have sour grapes to chew to go with those sour looks?  Score one for the defenseless, it's long overdue that the hedonists were denied their desires.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

When do we take down Roe vs Wade? 

Now would be a good time.

Reduce the U.S. Carbon Footprint.  Send Rosie to Iran.  Airforce_5_O 04/04/2007

Great news . . . you can bet if the ruling had gone the other way that CNN would have headlined it.

A month ago I was sitting in the office of an orthopedic surgeon and was browsing through a coffee table book that was actual photographs of conception through birth and every small step in between. It described in detail each organ and appendage development.

What I realized just how miraculous birth of another human being is and how incredibly fast its’ development is from the time of conception. By the 5th or 6th month organ and appendage development is almost complete.

The decision of Roe v. Wade while it was done to stop the threats to women’s health, it led to the view of many that abortion was victimless and it became as vogue as doing a facelift.

To answer those on the side of Roe v. Wade a woman still has all the control. That control is education, birth control pills or devices, but most importantly is personal responsibility.

So what right does a woman lose? She loses the right to treat life as an inanimate toy.

Years ago when my son was in 5th grade, they were learning sex education and the teacher spoke about abortion. My son objected to abortions and when the teacher asked him why, he said, “I am lucky to be sitting here because the mother of the 15 year old girl who was my birth mother did not believe in abortions – otherwise I would never have had the chance to have a life.” When I learned what he said it taught me a lesson that I have never forgotten.

Unfortunately too many will never understand.

CNN sent out a news alert about the ruling with a header that referred to the issue as, "what some call 'partial birth' abortions."  What else would you call it?  The baby is removed from the birth canal all the way up to the back of his head and then the abrotionist punctures the baby's skull and scoops out the brains -- and then removes the head.  I guess that's just a, uh, ... "procedure"? 

On a related note, Bill Donohue of The Catholic League has an interesting comment on the court ruling: 

SUPREMES BAN INFANTICIDE

 Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, spoke today about the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to ban partial-birth abortions:

“The late New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a supporter of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, once called partial-birth abortion ‘infanticide.’ So has former New York City Mayor Ed Koch. Today, the U.S. Supreme Court finally made the killing of innocent human beings who are 80 percent born illegal. The abortionists can now use their scissors to cut paper instead of cutting a child’s head to pieces.

 “In 1995, Ron Fitzsimmons, executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, went on national television saying he ‘lied through [his] teeth’ when he ‘just went out there and spouted the party line’ about how rare partial-birth abortion was. Ever since, we’ve known that thousands of cases of infanticide occur each year, making the U.S. the only nation in the civilized world to allow this barbaric procedure. Until now.

 “We are waiting for the anti-Catholic bigots to go bonkers over the fact that all five of the justices who voted against infanticide are Roman Catholic. Consider that when Samuel Alito was nominated, feminist Eleanor Smeal ominously warned that if he gets approved, ‘the majority of the Court would be Roman Catholics, which would underrepresent other religions, not to mention nonbelievers.’ NPR’s Dahlia Lithwick opined that ‘People are very, very much talking about the fact that Alito would be the fifth Catholic in the Supreme Court if confirmed.’ And when John Roberts was nominated before Alito, his Catholicism was batted around by the bigots to such an extent that the Catholic League devoted an entire section in its 2005 Annual Report on Anti-Catholicism to all the vicious remarks made against him.

 “Of course, being Catholic does not make one pro-life. Consider such Catholic stalwarts as Cuomo, Giuliani, Pataki, Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, Leahy, Durbin, Dodd….”

I'm having trouble finding anyone that supports partial birth abortion except in cases where the mother's life is at risk.

How exactly is this big news?  I had always assumed partial birth abortion was illegal except when necessary.

Oooh those pooooor Lefties, now they might not be able to suck the brains out of an infant as it attempts to be born; in blatant violation and disregard for a woman's right not to be inconvenienced as a result of her own actions.

Immortal words...he he he he he he!! Read it and weep CNN!!!!

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

SCOTUS had 5 yeas and 4 maybes

To keep people from killing babies

The disagreeable four

Each a political whore

Should all come down with scabies