Former NOW Chapter President Exposes Left's Media Agenda

Photo of Justin McCarthy.

As noted by Matthew Sheffield and Tim Graham, elements of the left run a massive campaign to destroy major media figures that do not ideologically march lockstep with them. This story appeared on the April 16 edition of "The O’Reilly Factor" when former Los Angeles area NOW president, and self proclaimed liberal Tammy Bruce appeared to expose that agenda.

Host Bill O’Reilly noted that he is investigating with Sean Hannity how leftist distortions and smears find their way into the mainstream media. Tammy Bruce noted that elements of the left take phrases out of context to demonize not only conservatives, but anyone who is not a complete liberal ideologue and they started with a test case on Dr. Laura Schlessinger.

O’Reilly questioned why they’d target the left leaning radio host Don Imus. Bruce noted a purging effort by the far left most visible in the Lamont-Lieberman race offered this insight:

"In order to be able to even go after Republicans eventually or conservatives, these far left forces need to purge our own house of Democrats like myself who speak the truth and will confront them on what they are."

Tammy Bruce also noted how, as a NOW chapter president, any agenda she wanted was easily advanced by major newspapers.

"I used them. I mean, my best friend when I was the president of NOW is I could dial a phone and I would move the story through the "New York Times" owned newspapers. It was the network that I could rely on. There I was sitting in my basement alone writing the National Organization for Women in Los Angeles, and because I would get an idea and package it, I would move it nationally the next day. That certainly is not -- now frankly, I'm proud of most of my work. But the truth of the matter is I used essentially what is a conspiratorial network of people in the newspaper and television industry at the time that would move whatever it is that I wanted moved."

Bill O’Reilly also noted that this leftist agenda is advanced by the "New York Times" and elements at NBC (presumably Keith Olbermann) and "Newsweek." The entire transcript is below.

BILL O’REILLY: Now, as the former president for NOW, National Organization for Women, you certainly know this world.

TAMMY BRUCE: Sure do.

O’REILLY: And I, I am, Sean Hannity and I are doing an investigation on this. And we should have it for everybody on Monday on "The Factor." But I am seeing danger for this nation. Because of all of this dishonesty being fed out of this far left swamp into the mainstream media. Am I overstating it?

TAMMY BRUCE: No, you're not. And coming from the left, one of the agendas that we had of course was the realization that we had to at least make our agenda appear to be broader and more accepted than it was. We would create sub groups, separate special interest groups making it appear as though there was a large mainstream movement occurring when there wasn't.. Of course the argument was that the end justified, was justified the means. Now in this instance in what you have just talked about with, with Mr. DeLay is what happened to you is what happened what I consider the test case back six, seven years ago to Dr. Laura Schlessinger, with a word plucked out of a sentence used in an attempt to destroy one person. That effort, Bill, was launched by about a half a dozen people only and facilitated through the internet of well financed, small group of people who have literally and they did then and they still do, have a list of individuals that that are to be targeted, because they know that– Well, you are on it of course. It's, it’s people who are not intimidated, who will not be silenced of their own accord, and so they must be destroyed. We saw it start with Coulter a few months ago, and it's moved to Imus. And of course they will move down their list because we're moving into this election.

O’REILLY: Okay. Now the Laura Schlessinger thing you are talking is about she had a television show. She said something about gays and the Bible. They took it out, they ran with it. All the sponsors of her TV show bolted and she didn't get a television show. And that was the first one. But, you know, people will say to you listen Don Imus was essentially a liberal guy on the radio. He gave platform to the far left. Why would they target Don Imus?

BRUCE: Well, he’s, just the reason I get targeted is quote, not being a, quote, "real Democrat." He is targeted because I see him as being the Lieberman, if you will, of, of the Democratic framework. There is a civil war going on right now between the far left individual extremists as you’ve, as you’ve noted them to be, and the classical liberal basic Democrats. And that is where you saw the Lamont-Lieberman attack happened, the attempt to purge Lieberman. In order to be able to even go after Republicans eventually or conservatives, these far left forces need to purge our own house of Democrats like myself who speak the truth and will confront them on what they are. That's why Imus had to be eliminated. And that's why they went after him first. And now they'll proceed down their list.

O’REILLY: Okay, now, there's also a list, and I don't know whether you are aware of this, but this is what Sean and I are working on, of mainstream media people like Frank Rich and others who are used by these far left web sites, fed stuff directly to them.

BRUCE: Oh yes. I used them.

O’REILLY: And they put it in the papers.

BRUCE: I used them. I mean, my best friend when I was the president of NOW is I could dial a phone and I would move the story through the "New York Times" owned newspapers. It was the network that I could rely on. There I was sitting in my basement alone writing the National Organization for Women in Los Angeles, and because I would get an idea and package it, I would move it nationally the next day. That certainly is not -- now frankly, I'm proud of most of my work. But the truth of the matter is I used essentially what is a conspiratorial network of people in the newspaper and television industry at the time that would move whatever it is that I wanted moved.

O’REILLY: You bet. And we have elements at NBC who do it every day. We have elements at "Newsweek" magazine who do it, and we're going to name one of those tomorrow. We have the "New York Times."

BRUCE: Good. Good for you.

O’REILLY: But, but you’re telling me you had people that you could feed stories to they would print verbatim. Wouldn't check them you could just feed what you wanted to them and pop it right out there.

BRUCE: Yes. It was mostly, it was mostly about, it was mostly theory, it was attitude, it was the idea itself. And we'd move it through the "New York Times" and of course it would move to the "Boston Globe."

O’REILLY: Oh absolutely, on the wire and out to all the other stations.

BRUCE: Well the Rosies -- the wires were particularly important. Absolutely.

O’REILLY: Right, right, and now you have Rosie O'Donnell who is now doing this in the entertainment realm. They contact her, they feed her this crap. She spits it out in front of all the women who are watching her on ABC. And this is how it goes.

BRUCE: Well you have multiple impressions using different media. You’ve got of course newspapers and people like Frank Rich. It's moved through the guarantors on camera like Rosie O'Donnell. So a regular Americans hear it from so many different avenues they believe it's true. And they get really immersed in it. Our job is, and part of what I see as my job now is to expose that method so that Americans can finally make up their own minds. And that's through talk radio and the internet. That's why this–

O’REILLY: We appreciate it Tammy.

BRUCE: Thank you.

O’REILLY: And we're taking up the mantle.

BRUCE: Excellent.

O’REILLY: We're going to expose everyone in this dishonest swamp.

BRUCE: Good for you. Good luck.

O’REILLY: Because it's danger to the nation.

BRUCE: It is.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bruce is credible, smart,  a

Bruce is credible, smart,  and articulate. This is delicious. Let the games begin.

Oooh, did you say "art

Oooh, did you say "articulate"???? Isn't that an insult?! Oh, that's right, she's white. Nevermind.

lol

lol

It's probably ok to note th

It's probably ok to note that she's "clean", too?

Rosie said she would stop did

Rosie said she would stop didn't she? Perhaps the VT murders postponed this little nugget:

www.prisonplanet.com...

Can't see Barbara allowing her to do this but if so Tammy Bruce looks to be on the money.

Funny thing is these are the kinds of people who incubated Tim McVeigh if I'm not mistaken.

Ms. Bruce was much more effec

Ms. Bruce was much more effective than O'Reilly, with his usual view that he is the center of the media universe. Still, I give him credit for bringing this insidious practice to the forefront - and for not interrupting Ms. Bruce - as he is wont to do.

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Why is she admitting this? 

Why is she admitting this?  Doesn't she know she will be shunned like Bernie Goldberg? 

Does she no longer feel that the ends justify the means?  I don’t know if NOW is still doing this, but I used to be a pro-choice Republican until I had an epiphany.  I used to give to NOW and they pretended to not favor a party just the pro-choice position.  They would send stuff at election time listing pro-choice candidates.  I live in IL where there are many pro-choice Republicans, but they  were never listed in their literature.  I quit giving money to them and that was the beginning of my shift to a pro-life position.  Once you start to see one lie the rest become clearer.   

Why is she admitting this?

Why is she admitting this? Doesn't she know she will be shunned like Bernie Goldberg? --Dee Bunk

Ms. Bruce has already been shunned, so it's no skin off her nose any more. Her book "The New Thought Police" tells how she used to one of the insiders of the feminist movement and how she was drummed out of the club for daring to question, and to disagree with some of their tactics.

motherbelt is spot on.  Tamm

motherbelt is spot on.  Tammy has been the bain of NOW and the Left for years.  While she is openly gay and professes to still be a liberal, she is also a defender of traditional values.  Two of her books, "The New Thought Police" and "The Death of Right and Wrong," are great reads, and I recommend them both.  In the former book, she explains what led her to doubt NOW after the OJ Simpson verdict and soon leave it, as well as her defense of Laura Schlessinger.

Two other nemeses of NOW are two college professors: Camille Paglia and Christina Hoff Sommers (author of "Who Stole Feminism?).  The three ladies are politically liberal, but aggressively attack the radical Left and its agenda in each public appearance.

Galvanic and Motherbelt - tha

Galvanic and Motherbelt - thanks for the info.  I was not familiar with her.  I may have to try her books. 

I don't think you'll be disap

I don't think you'll be disappointed, Dee Bunk.  Tammy is smart, articulate, and passionate about battling the Left's agenda to rip-out the foundations of American culture.  The first time I saw her was perhaps 5-6 years ago or so, when C-Span aired her appearance before a rather hostile auditorium full of faculty and staff at Berkeley.  She was dismantling their assumptions and myths everytime they dared to pose a question, and I was compelled to watch the show to the end to find out who she was.

Since reading her books, I never miss an opportunity to listen to her on TV shows (mostly the Fox News channel).  She's a real jedi knight in the culture wars.

As a sharp-tongued liberal, Camille Paglia is a fun read

Camille Paglia has long been one of my favorite reads.   You don't have to agree with everything she says to understand that she's honest and will skewer phony or stupid leftist with an equal glee that she exhibits when picks on conservatives.    Sort of what Molly Ivans pretended to be, but was too mean and partisan to pull off.

In addition to being smart and funny, the best recommendation for her is that the left dislikes her.

I absolutely have nothing but

I absolutely have nothing but respect and adore Camilla, what an absolute dry biting wit she has, Tammy Bruce has been a fav for years of mine...both have.

The left love to hate them.

Camille's attacks on the Left

Camille's attacks on the Left can be particularly acute.  She refers to the feminist upper elite (i.e. Ireland, Steinem, Smeal, Gandy, etc.) as "The Kremlin," for their top-down, dictatorial clutch on the feminist movement that demands devotion to a socialist agenda in addition to basic feminist ideals regarding equal pay for equal work, etc.

Looks like Tammy is ON TOP OF

Looks like Tammy is ON TOP OF "THE LIST" now:)!

I'd think twice about twisting my ignition key from now on if I were her...

Looking forward to more soon, Bill!!!!!!

Yes, indeed.  Couldn't be ha

Yes, indeed.  Couldn't be happening at a better time.

She is about to be "Fost

She is about to be "Fosterized"...

Rog,I just got to quit saving

Rog,

I just got to quit saving these links but I love this one...precious it is.

By the way, I remember when I put in Murtharized about Murtha and hater and others went nuts...well, heck, I am still waiting for him to get Murtharized, guess it is not gonna happen, not with a 'D' behind his name...I know I just made up the word, but what I meant in my mind was like pounding tough meat...tenderizing..lol.

Webb Hubbell learned his lesson, he just rolled on over one more time....

Tammy Bruce is fraternizing 

Tammy Bruce is fraternizing with ... nay, aiding and abetting the enemy, a white, non-liberal male.  She must have a big self-loathing streak.  Like Jason Whitlock and Shelby Steele, for failing to take up the victimhood mantle.

To quote T.D. Jakes: "Wo

To quote T.D. Jakes: "Woman, Thou Art Loosed"

Bruce is incredibly street-sm

Bruce is incredibly street-smart in unmasking lib games. I've been raving on-line about the fraudulent America at the Crossroads on PBS and the way CPB is allowed to promote BDS without any oversight.

The entire media complex leans leftward at about a 70ADA rating according to a UCLA study in 2005 which covered 20 years of media activism. Zogby had a recent survey showing Americans believing around 2/1 that the media leans leftish.

The real shocker in all of th

The real shocker in all of this is that Hannity and O'Reilly working together.   They don't particularly like it other.  Have you ever seen one on the others show.  NO.

That is gonna be interesting to watch. 

I guess Hannity does agree with Bill O'Reilly at least some times!~

Yes, Hannity was caught bei

Yes, Hannity was caught being very friendly to Keith Olbermann in a chance meeting by a media type writing for New York mag. Sean does have some sort of an Oedipal relationship----both grew up in Long Island suburbs and strong Catholic backgrounds separated by a father/son age gap.

Not exactly Hasselbeck/O'Donnell dimensions to the simmering undercurrents, but remember that the B O'R and Hannity programs are enter- or info-tainment. Soaps larded with politics or vice-versa.

Using this as a base, we can

Using this as a base, we can now start spreading Olbermann/Hannity man-love rumors...

Speaking of exposing an agend

Speaking of exposing an agenda, check out this column in Sunday's WashPost by Joe Hicks, entitled "Drop the Race Card".

Excerpt, and it gets better:

What remains of the once-proud civil rights movement justifies its existence by contending -- despite widespread progress -- that black people continue to live marginalized and victimized lives. This oft-repeated theme was the base for the ugly stew that was the reaction to Imus's slur, and it was the operating theme for Nifong as he set about attempting to ruin the lives of three innocent men.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/13/AR2007041302089.html?hpid=opinionsbox2

Unless I'm mistaken, I though

Unless I'm mistaken, I thought I heard Tammy on C-SPAN, during a speaking engagement at a university where anarchist students in the crowd tried to interrupt or shout her down but she boldly, intelligently, and sternly addressed every comment thrown at her ... anyhow, back on point, I believe she explained she "lost face" and leadership with NOW and the left when she DARED remark to the members that in this age of birth control that abortion should NOT be NOW's main talking point ... that abortion should possibly not even be needed as much with all the was available to women today .. I think her point was, and it was a couple years ago when I watched this,but I think she believed NOW should be pushing more for birth control and responsible sex, and less on abortion .... Weeeellllll!  That's like telling the Catholic Church to do away with Holy Communion ... Bruce has voted for and supports Pres. Bush, in addition to supporting the War on Terror, especially the battlefield in Iraq.

well thats cuz 'she's a chick

well thats cuz 'she's a chick with a gun and a microphone' and worth a stop by on the web

Would that Bawbra Wawa had

Would that Bawbra Wawa had her guest host on her show. It'd make for some interesting exchanges between her, Tokyo Rosie, and Joyless Behar.

but that would be 2 against 1

but that would be 2 against 1 they better get Sean Penn