As liberals in the media call for the firing of well-known conservative radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh in the wake of the Don Imus controversy, none seems willing to turn the politically correct microscope on those espousing views from the left.
With that in mind, Lisa De Pasquale, Conservative Political Action Conference director for the American Conservative Union, published an article at Human Events Tuesday wonderfully illustrating the obvious double standard between what liberal media members can say or write versus their colleagues on the other side of the aisle.
The target of De Pasquale’s disaffection was the blogger formerly known as “Wonkette,” Time.com’s Ana Marie Cox (emphasis added throughout):
For those that don’t know, Wonkette is basically Washington, DC’s raunchier version of Star magazine, like a political PerezHilton.com. Ana Marie Cox, who began writing as Wonkette in 2003, infamously broke the story of former congressional staffer Jessica Cutler’s blog about her sexual conquests. When Cutler talked about her, um, relationship with a Republican chief of staff, Cox posted all the pictures she could find of Republican and male chiefs of staff.
Yet, Cox’s writings win her praise rather than scorn:
There’s another double standard that’s not being discussed. Cox (and the current Wonkette bloggers) never hesitate to make crude, politically and factually incorrect comments about women. If she (or any woman) would have said “nappy-headed hos” it would be called catty not racist. Or gossipy instead of sexist.
This is akin to Democrat politicians and “civil rights leaders” being allowed to make clearly racist remarks about anybody they want without raising an eyebrow from the PC crowd. Of course, such leeway is certainly extended to crude remarks about anyone on the right:
Conservative women like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Katherine Harris and Michele Bachman have been insulted in the same vain by Wonkette. A picture of Ann Coulter speaking is captioned on Wonkette.com, “Nothin’ but Diet Coke, nicotine, and blow in her system.” A Wonkette “operative” asks if Michelle Malkin will be doing a sexual trick on her videoblog. Katherine Harris’s physical attributes (her “eyes” as Imus calls them) are discussed and she is called a “street whore.”
On the President, Wonkette writes, “We didn't accuse George Bush of being gay because he holds his hand in a ‘nelly way.’ We accused him of being gay because he likes ****.”
How clever. Think a conservative could get away with that in this environment?
Regardless of the answer, De Pasquale marvelously concluded:
Don Imus’s critics complained that his supporters, including CBS and MSNBC up until a week ago, enabled his foulmouthed behavior because he brought in listeners and commercial dollars. The foulmouthed Ana Marie Cox doesn’t sell books and probably hasn’t sold any additional Time subscriptions. What does that say about her enablers?
Anyone want to answer De Pasquale’s question?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I didn't realize how nasty W
April 17, 2007 - 11:46 ET by dahliatraversI didn't realize how nasty Wonkette could be. Thanks, Noel. This will be a very useful reference, especially when the subject of hate speech comes up.
It's interesting that when the msm talks about offensive or over the top commentators, only Coulter and those on the right are cited and decried.
Anna Marie is a walking talki
April 17, 2007 - 11:57 ET by bigtimerAnna Marie is a walking talking double standard, but hey, she wants to be in the elite political circle she said so herself last week when speaking of not going on the Imus show again when asked if she would ever go on again.
I am paraphrasing here, but that is about the gist of it.
I have never been able to stand the over-rated bimbo, the leftist media build their own little elite leftists..she was perfect for the molding.
when speaking of not going on
April 17, 2007 - 12:11 ET by dahliatraverswhen speaking of not going on the Imus show again when asked if she would ever go on again.
Yes, it's interesting how the standards of some of Imus' past guests suddenly went up after this incident.
Wonkette? You're going afte
April 17, 2007 - 20:08 ET by j. frank wilsonWonkette? You're going after Wonkette? The blog that clearly states it is:
A blend of gossip and satire and things the author makes up.
First of all, Ana Marie Cox is no longer Wonkette and hasn't been for a while. Your blog does not make that clear. It hints around at it - but telling the truth might dilute the pathetic point you're trying to make.
Yes, she did link to Jessica Cutler's personal blog. No one has ever claimed - let alone proven - that what Ms. Cutler wrote was not true. If a member of the current Administration was embarassed to have it public knowledge that he paid a Member's staff member for sex (with his member?) precisely whose fault was that?
You're defending Ann Falter? She is cruel, vicious, hardhearted, vitrolic, meanspirited - and those are the comments from conservatives! Michelle Malkin ought to be able to stick up for herself. Based on what she writes and says, she has already had plenty of practice.
Finally, this blog uses an extraordinarily tired right wing "arguement." "What if a conservative said..." "What would happen if...." Very, very tired. There are plenty of factual comparisons available out there - the writings and comments from both Ms. Falter and Ms. Malkin provide plenty of material for an actual comparison. But that would involve work, wouldn't it?
Katherine Harris' "campaign" was a joke. How many staff members did she hire and fire - how many totally out there comments did she make? She is her own worst enemy.
Wonkette? I can't believe it...
You can have Ann Coulter, J F
April 19, 2007 - 07:16 ET by dahliatraversYou can have Ann Coulter, J Frank. I'm not a big fan.
But do you dispute the quotes attributed to Wonkette? Clearly, these words and sentiments, too, are "cruel, vicious, hardhearted, vitriolic, meanspirited". Why is it "satire" when the writer is on the left side of the spectrum but "cruel and vicious" when employed by someone on the right?
Let's conduct an exercise in that which you are "very tired" of. How would you characterize Mr. Shabazz calling Michelle Malkin a "political prostitute" on the Bill O'Reilly Show? And how would you have felt if Mr. Shabazz had said the same thing to Ms. Cox?