The controversial host of ABC’s “The View,” Rosie O’Donnell, posted a peculiar rant at her blog Saturday that seemed to be two parts confession, and one part recognition that the firing of Don Imus might be an ominous portent for her career.
To begin with, it certainly was no coincidence that she opened with a reference to the recently terminated radio host (emphasis added throughout):
a huge terrible storm is coming
a nor easterthe potential hail has bumped imus
off r top story tonight
Next, O’Donnell referenced the Stop Rosie website NB’s Matt Sheffield reported about on Sunday:
correct quotes
thank you ethan
well done
With that, O’Donnell tried to explain what she meant when she stated some months back that we shouldn’t fear terrorists because they’re mothers and fathers, too:
here is the point
i was trying to make
to elisabeth
who cant see any of “them”
as anything but terroristshundreds of thousands of humans
not “terrorists”
iraqi mothers and fathers
have been killed by USthose innocent ones
the mothers and fathers
they r not “terrorists”
Yes, Rosie. We’ve killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis in this war. Where’d you get that number from?
Of course, Rosie isn’t one to care much about the accuracy of the “data” she shares with viewers or readers. For instance, here was another gem from the comedienne that badly missed the mark:
28 million american children live in dire poverty
Where’d you get that from, Rosie? After all, according to the most recent Census figures, as of 2005, there were 12.9 million people under 18 years of age in America living in poverty. As such, you were only off by 15 million, or 54 percent!
Of course, Rosie was just getting warmed up presenting her typically errant data:
1/2 of all black and hispanic kids in america
do not graduate from high school
Really? Where’d you get that from, Rosie? According to this Census chart, 80 percent of blacks living in America 18 years old and older have graduated high school. Fortunately, she was a little closer with her Hispanic figure, although this Census chart put it more at 60 percent.
Facts really are a stupid thing, aren’t they Rosie?
Yet, as she moved to a conclusion, Rosie suggested a bit of a change of direction for her:
from now on i will not raise my voice
about this criminal administration
i am sick of screaming IMPEACHunreal
from now on i will say
unreal
ok
just know on the inside
i will be yelling
I’ll believe it when I see it.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
Comments Policy
Oh please...I am laughing so
April 15, 2007 - 23:14 ET by bigtimerOh please...I am laughing so hard at just the picture....
I can't stop Noel...
Now reading the pathetic B.S. on her blog...oh please...you guys got to stop...
Somebody take over, this is a riot!
Rosie
April 16, 2007 - 00:48 ET by acadia1755The Liberals have become what they hate.
Um, I was thinking, how did
April 16, 2007 - 01:01 ET by MBConservUm, I was thinking, how did she get famous?
"Before I refuse to take your questions...I have a statement.." Ronald Reagan
...she was an affable stand-u
April 16, 2007 - 09:27 ET by TruthMonger...she was an affable stand-up comic known as "the queen of nice!"
I challenge these so-called "peace-activists" to organize JUST ONE MAJOR D.C. PROTEST AGAINST AL QUEDA by the end of 2007...
That Rosie. She's such an i
April 15, 2007 - 23:22 ET by John in CAThat Rosie. She's such an intellectual.
Are you sure about that 80% of blacks 18 and older have graduated college? Have 80% of Americans, period, graduated from college? That seems might high. Maybe from high school.
If Rosie had limited her 50% of blacks and hispanics from the inner cities aren't finishing high school, she'd probably be closer to the mark. Of course, that's the fine government run schools on display. I pity the kids who have to attend LAUSD.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
HAHAHA!!! lol. 80 % of blac
April 15, 2007 - 23:40 ET by mostlymoderateRosie is getting back to comedy I see. She really is funny!!! lol
Mostly, I think Noel missta
April 15, 2007 - 23:43 ET by John in CAMostly, I think Noel misstated that fact. I opened the linky and it looks to me like it should have been graduated from high school. Looks like blacks, 18+ graduated from college is about 16%.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
I noticed that too John right
April 15, 2007 - 23:53 ET by bigtimerI noticed that too John right off and did a double-take, I just figured it was a typo or such and would be corrected by morning...I also was laughing so hard it just didn't matter to me, that picture of her, the blog...oh my!
He'll fix it, Noel fixes everything!
It's a meant as a laugh for those of you out there in Rio Linda.
John, BT, et al
April 16, 2007 - 07:15 ET by Noel SheppardJohn, BT, et al --
Good catch. This is what comes from working in unfamiliar environs like a hotel room in Arlington, Texas, with wife and daughter watching TV just steps away. Very difficult to concentrate. Not my normal writing environment. Can't wait to get outta here! ns
;) Come on Rev. Noel, don't
April 16, 2007 - 08:14 ET by nicksmith112;)
Come on Rev. Noel, don't blame the wife and kids...lol.
Noel, did ya enjoy the Torna
April 16, 2007 - 09:18 ET by Dan The Man 2Noel, did ya enjoy the Tornado, I had Karl whip it up just for you. Seriously it was kinda fun to watch my 17 year old daughter get scared and I had to calm her down. I actually watched one jump over my house one, yes im stupid. But Friday was fun, I told my wife not to drive IH 20 though until the tornado scare passed, lol cant be too careful with my family.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
Ignoring what I already kno
April 15, 2007 - 23:41 ET by entIgnoring what I already know about her from television, it's hard to take seriously someone who writes like a such moron ... no capitalization, no punctuation whatsoever, a new line for every thought (and I use that term loosely), and abbreviations like "r" for "are".
Is this just an affectation or does she really write that way?
Rosie seems to have that af
April 15, 2007 - 23:45 ET by John in CARosie seems to have that affliction that too many Americans have these days. She writes everything like she's text messaging, or a teenager on Yahoo Messenger.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
Oh I know! It gets really ol
April 16, 2007 - 00:03 ET by mostlymoderateOh I know! It gets really old after awhile. I still can't believe a sapsucker like Rosie stays on the air and somebody like Imus gets axed. If anybody has been a disgrace on the airwaves, it has been Rosie.
Rosie falls into two protec
April 16, 2007 - 00:36 ET by John in CARosie falls into two protected classes of Americans. She's a radical feminist and a lesbian. Thus, she can say whatever she wants, because to attack what she says is to attack what she is.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
That is so true.
April 16, 2007 - 00:48 ET by mostlymoderateThat is so true.
a sapsucker like Rosie LOL
April 16, 2007 - 13:23 ET by misterbilla sapsucker like Rosie -- isn't it yellow-bellied sapsucker??
yellow-bellied sapsucker
–noun a woodpecker, and we know why xx xx made of xxxx! a salacious comment!
she'll be just as stupid
April 16, 2007 - 10:39 ET by tumbler_2007On the INSIDE, Rosie'll be just as stupid as she always is on the outside.
"No capitalization, no p
April 16, 2007 - 12:20 ET by Jerry"No capitalization, no punctuation, a new line for every thought.."
It's as if there were a handful of thoughts bouncing around in a total vacumn, meeting no resistance, until by chance, one finds an opening to pop out of, and when you have a mouth of epic proportions, where else would it pop out of? I admit, sometimes the path is obstructed by a chili cheese dog or side of beef, but there are times when a random, lonely, unformed, unintelligible thought works its way out.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
She is unglued. She is a tota
April 16, 2007 - 00:08 ET byShe is unglued. She is a total nut-case!
I learned, while on AOL, that homosexuals (on a whole) are upset with everyone --they are simply put, angry. And most of them hate America because America was founded on nondenominational Christianity. (Nondenominational Christianity, is what the 1st amendment is really all about, by the way.)
What they do not realize, is that over in the 3rd world countries, the one's they like to defend, their kind are often put to death.
They are not too bright, to say the least.
Debra...
Hate to feed the obvious atte
April 16, 2007 - 01:25 ET by tracheostomyHate to feed the obvious attempt at thread hijacking there, but how on earth could the United States be founded on "nondenominational Christianity," when the founders were all born into, living in, and surrounded by. . .various denominations that helped influence the founding of the country?
There really isn't any such thing as a "non-denominational church." Calling yourself a non-denominational church is a sales pitch to fill the pews with people burned by other denominations. Either your church has sold out its doctrinal heritage (the denomination that both founded it and taught your pastor), or your church is some kind of exclusivist cult.
Let the shooting war begin. I can take it. But before you react out of subjective emotion, just think real hard about what I said. Your so-called "non-denominational" church does not exist in a vacuum, nor did it originate from one.
-PJ
Hi PJ, No, I am not trying to
April 16, 2007 - 01:58 ET byHi PJ,
No, I am not trying to hijack this thread. I was trying to make a point, without going against my faith beliefs or stumbling anyone who is new to the faith. I know that many people have preconceived notions, as to what "Christianity" is, and I just want to make sure that I am not misunderstood.
I will be happy to respond to you on the topic of this thread, but if you want to get into doctrinal differences, you have my email address, please feel free to email me again.
Debra...
Oh, and I will be a couple hours, before I can respond again, because I need to sew two toddler dresses. ...DJ <--- hehe.. You are PJ.... and I am DJ... maybe we are related... hehe... just kidding... :P***
They are a hateful lot--drive
April 16, 2007 - 02:13 ET by Andrew H.They are a hateful lot--driven to tear down the country regardless of faith or lack of it. And we stand back and let them be spokespeople--instead of making a decision not to watch their bile.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
No thank you Debra, I'd be m
April 16, 2007 - 02:30 ET by tracheostomyNo thank you Debra, I'd be much happier if you took your doctrinal agenda to a more applicable thread later on. And if you do, I promise to do likewise. M'kay?
-PJ
PJ,I have been very nice to
April 16, 2007 - 03:08 ET byPJ,
I have been very nice to you, while you have been nothing but trouble to me. Your emails ended up being nasty (mean), yet I would still be willing to let you email me, if it would stop you from causing trouble here. However, as you could see from my responses to your emails, I will not engage in an argument with you. If I have to stop responding to you on NBs, I have no problem with that.
Have a nice day. I have to get back to sewing. Breaks over.
:o)
Debra...
Debra, he really has it out f
April 16, 2007 - 03:24 ET by Conservative VoiceDebra, he really has it out for you...I caught him trying to start a fight with you on this thread http://newsbusters.org/node/12032#comment, and I called him on it.
I am not sure what his problem is, but it seems you have a stalker on your hands. What a jerk.
Trach, she wasn't saying non-
April 16, 2007 - 03:29 ET by Conservative VoiceTrach, she wasn't saying non-denominational church as a church, but that all "Christian" churches, not sure what you have against Debra, but you are really out of line.
Debra, you are wrong on the Constitution just being for "Christian" churches. Its about not having a state church, forcing people to be of a certain type of religion.
Calling me a stalker. How ass
April 16, 2007 - 11:18 ET by tracheostomyCalling me a stalker. How assumptive of you. Debra and I have been PMing/emailing for quite awhile now. I have been asking her about her beliefs and she's been nothing but evasive the whole time. She says she can't tell me about her church because of her "activist work".
Where do you think her priorities are now, hm? This has nothing to do with her faith, and everything to do with her agenda. She's very evasive.
Oh, by the way. Thanks for being so open minded and slow to jump to conclusions--OH, wait. . .you weren't.
-PJ
I can only go by what I see y
April 16, 2007 - 12:18 ET by Conservative VoiceI can only go by what I see you post. Not sure why you are so interested in her beliefs, this is a political blog site...and for some reason you are singling her out (which to me is stalking).
I and others got on her case a while back for trying to preach and downgrading other peoples' beliefs and religions. So now I am on your case for the same. Last time I checked, we have freedom of religion. No one should be bullied because of what beliefs they have. Personally you are a jerk, I wouldn't want to respond to you about my personal beliefs either.
but how on earth could the
April 16, 2007 - 05:06 ET by Jack BauerWell quite easily actually, as non-denominational simply means open or acceptable to people of any Christian denomination.
I don't follow your point, or your thought process here.
debra meant this is God's Country
April 16, 2007 - 10:55 ET by tumbler_2007I'll concede to Debra's wise intent mistakenly expressed. We live in God's Country by simple definition, even non-believing Americans.
But the United States of America wasn't founded on any religious basis; it happens that in the times of our Founders many were believers. This nation is as much unchurched as Christian, with room for eastern religions, denominational sects, and skeptics. We all love our own Credo.
Yet only one Credo can ever prove true. That has little to do with ANY nation.
'
Sorry Jack. Contrary to popul
April 16, 2007 - 11:23 ET by tracheostomySorry Jack. Contrary to popular belief, all denominations have a doctrinal heritage, as well as the so-called nondenominational church. They don't just set up shop and crack open a Bible. There's an educational history and a traditional thread that leads to historically Methodist, Baptist, Catholic, etc. etc. roots.
A church that accepts people from any denomination is just plain flakey. =) Most of your liberal churches fall into this category. The more divergent and potentially conflicting beliefs you bring in, the more compromising the leadership has to be.
-PJ
dear tracheo
April 16, 2007 - 11:42 ET by tumbler_2007What ?
"all denominations have a doctrinal heritage, as well as the so-called nondenominational church. They don't just set up shop and crack open a Bible. There's an educational history and a traditional thread that leads to historically---- Methodist, Baptist, Catholic, etc. etc. roots."
Sorry, tracheostomit,
Catholicism isn't a denomination, it means the faith of the holy apostles; from whence came all the truth.
Later on, without any authority whatsoever, MEN founded the various heretical churches of "Christendom" and even tampered with the Holy Bible. This became the slippery slope which ended in over 28,000 sectarian, denominational and mainly autonomous churches. They really owe loyalty to the bisop of Rome in which all authority from Christ rests. But they renounce him.
They are rivals of ONE Church; the One founded by Jesus Christ. All are comprised of souls who descend from those faithful Catholics who lived prior to the so-called reformation.
Tumbler! Not my point! I'm sa
April 16, 2007 - 13:10 ET by tracheostomyTumbler! Not my point! I'm saying that every church has a belief history and is indebted to theologians of some sort who founded it.
What you refuse to admit about Catholicism is that your "one true church" abandoned its Augustinian roots centuries ago.
But of course you haven't read "The Pelagian Captivity of the Church." Nor will you ever hope to try, because you got your fingers in your ears with your faulty talking points.
You all call me a jerk just because I challenged your belief system and made you a little uncomfortable. I thought ad-hominem fallacy was for liberals. . .guess I was wrong. I'm not appealing to myself personally. Stop the diversions if you don't have anything to hide.
And BTW, this ^^^ is exactly why the GLBT community doesn't trust you. . .or the Bible.
-PJ
your point is irrelevant
April 17, 2007 - 00:17 ET by tumbler_2007What you refuse to admit about Catholicism is that your "one true church" abandoned its Augustinian roots centuries ago........... Absolutely. I do refuse.
The Church originated in Jerusalem, and was founded upon Peter the Rock, by the Son Of God. (Matt 16 :18) -- Who in the world needs "Any Pelagian Captivity of YOUR Idea of His ONE Church," ...? We have the grace of the Holy Spirit, the infallible Advocate promised by Jesus to his ONLY Church. (John 16:12-13)
To claim that His promises to His Church were not kept and that his Church wasn't able to survive over a few centuries is to make a fraud and a liar of Jesus Christ.
Furthermore, tracheotomies, you have NOT challenged "my" belief system at all. Don't flatter yourself. I am a believer in the revealed Word of God, not a belief system, as your cause is by definition. --Why should your ignorance make a Catholic uncomfortable ? Are you collecting scalps ?
Nobody called you a jerk. I said you'd been deceived by free-lance ministers who had NO connection whatever to any apostle. Ergo, they teach you their errors.
So says, you, tumbler.
April 16, 2007 - 23:55 ET bySo says, you, tumbler.
PJ, I sure hope that you are
April 16, 2007 - 14:36 ET byPJ,
I sure hope that you are not implying that the church I go to is like that of the UUC. Because you would be greatly mistaking. Though, we accept people who 'come out' of various types of churches, we only recognize true believers as true believers and part of the true church. Our church is part of the true body of believers, the 'true' church that Jesus founded on Himself, the truth, the word made flesh, the Rock, God Almighty. (flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. --Matt. 16:17b)
Debra...
Debra, I'd love for you to em
April 16, 2007 - 14:59 ET by tracheostomyDebra, I'd love for you to email me and specify exactly what that process of "recognition" involves. But of course, you won't do that, because it allegedly threatens your activist agenda. :sigh:
I really wish you'd quit being so vague and obscurist in your language. That's the only reason why I am frustrated. Nothing more.
-PJ
No, PJ,What frustrates you, i
April 16, 2007 - 16:54 ET byNo, PJ,
What frustrates you, is that I was on to you from the get-go, and I have not fallen into your traps.
I suppose I have an advantage over you, in that I know how to handle people like you. You clearly are at a loss, with how to handle me.
Debra...
So, just out of curiousity:So
April 16, 2007 - 17:01 ET by BDSo, just out of curiousity:
Someone who has performed all the above required for said "Recognition" but does it under the guise of another religious institution (Catholicisms "Confirmation" etc) is recognized by your fellow followers?
Hi BD,True believers come out
April 16, 2007 - 18:14 ET byHi BD,
True believers come out of many false teaching "churches". I myself, am a true believer despite the 'churches' that I was brought to as a kid --one of which has a lesbian for a 'minister' now. However, I told the minister at the time that I learned of how bad the place was (is) to stop all mailing contact with me --I was not still going there at that time. We are told to come out and be seperate. So, when someone does come to be saved, despite the 'church' they are going to that is not teaching correctly, they are called by God to come out of it. Many people in my church, have 'come out' of false teaching churches.Debra...
Please feel free to email me, if you wish to: djms@debrajmsmith.com
No, PJ, What frustrates you,
April 16, 2007 - 18:37 ET by tracheostomyNo, PJ, What frustrates you, is that I was on to you from the get-go, and I have not fallen into your traps.
#.1 Putting words in my mouth. I was dead honest about my frustration with you Debra. Deal with me honestly, please.
#2. What traps?!?? Please specify my so-called traps? I was asking details about your church and your specific belief system. No one is coming to "get you" on those details alone. You're perfectly safe. That is, unless you're part of some kook-fringe congregation (or cult) that tries to speak for other Christians.
My agenda is totally clear; there is freedom in this kind of full disclosure as well. Why don't you show your cards now Debra? We're getting tired of this "secret-mystery church" you keep trying to promote on this board.
True believers come out of many false teaching "churches". I myself, am a true believer despite the 'churches' that I was brought to as a kid --one of which has a lesbian for a 'minister' now.
And yet again, you not only deftly avoided BD's question, but you refused my offer to take this off-thread (a second time too, I might add). What exactly constitutes a "true believer," again? Give me some examples of false teaching without naming an organization. And as always, please email me with those specifics.
And another thing, why won't you share your church's faith statement? You said you had one. What are you hiding?
-PJ
PJ,You read my faith beliefs
April 16, 2007 - 20:44 ET byPJ,
You read my faith beliefs on my "beliefs" page, which is on my website. We emailed back and forth about my beliefs. But, this thread is not about me.
Debra...
You may well think so, Deb
April 17, 2007 - 00:34 ET by tumbler_2007That's what you think, Debra. You are mistaken.
If you're validly baptized, that makes you a Catholic Christian. For as long as you do NOT reject Christ's own Church (that is while you are invincibly ignorant).
Once you depart that fold, you're in the spiritual wilderness. That doesn't mean you're damned, ipso facto. But you can be damned by committing a grave sin. Because henceforth you have no means of obtaining the Church's absolution for your sin. (John 20, :21-22-23). You lose Christ's main channel of forgiveness, and remain in sin.
UNLESS by a singular (unchurched) gift of His grace God privately sees your PERFECT repentence (contrition) and grants you His forgiveness outside the true Church. In other words, you shall become a faithful Catholic despite your rejection of the real Holy Gospel ! By perfect contrition. Nothing shall be impossible for God, but you make it downright implausible, My dear.
tumbler, dear tumbler, You ha
April 17, 2007 - 03:24 ET bytumbler, dear tumbler,
You have directly addressed me on this topic, therefore I do hope that those who are looking on, will realize that I am responding to your direct post to me.
My grandparents on my father's side were Catholics and I rest on the hope that someone had the love and courage to tell them the truth, before they died. I know that God is fair and just, so such had to have happened.
tumbler, Jesus saves a soul, not a church. And it is the rejection of Jesus, that a person is condemned by (their own rejection, condemns them.) It is not a rejection of a 'church,' but their rejection of Jesus Christ. No where does Scripture ever say that we are saved by a church or damned for rejecting a 'church.'
And, tumbler, Scripture is very clear that our sins are against God and only God can forgive sin for a true cleansing of sin for salvation. A church cannot forgive our sins.
John 20: 21 - 23 says,
21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.
The Father sent Jesus and Jesus sends His followers out into the world to spread the gospel. Jesus breathed on His followers and gave them the Holy Ghost. (They were at that time, "Born again in Christ and filled with the Spirit of God.") They were to then go out and spread the gospel of Jesus Christ. This is so with all true born again believers.
Now, we look at verse 23, and you clearly think that verse is saying that Jesus was telling them that they could 'forgive sins.' No, that was not saying that, such would have been going against other Scripture, which says that only God forgives sin. So what does it mean? Please follow me here.
Because I am a born again believer in Christ, I go and spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I have had the blessing of walking some people through the sinner's prayer. After a person prays, calling on Christ in truth, confessing to be a sinner and believing on the risen Christ for salvation, confessing that He is Lord (God), I then ask the person some questions that are answered, I then say to the person, "You are forgiven. All of your sins are washed away and you are a new creation in Christ." The person listened to me tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ and came to be saved, and I basically give them the good news, that they are forgiven --I don't forgive them, I am simply giving them the good news. It is a very emotional and wonderful experience. However, there are times that I share the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the person rejects Christ, opting to continue on as they have been, lost. (I then find myself telling that person, that they are still in sin, that their sins remain. It is simply the obvious.)
John 20:23, is telling me, that when I share the gospel, there will be those who call on Christ and come to be forgiven, and that their will be those who won't.
Debra...
of course I directly addressed you
April 17, 2007 - 10:45 ET by tumbler_2007I did address Debra directly. because it's she who fancies herself ordained and teaches false doctrine.
Here is some of it: "I have had the blessing of walking some people through the sinner's prayer. After a person prays, calling on Christ in truth, confessing to be a sinner and believing on the risen Christ for salvation, confessing that He is Lord (God), I then ask the person some questions that are answered, I then say to the person, "You are forgiven. All of your sins are washed away and you are a new creation in Christ."
Clear balderdash. BECAUSE you're separated from the Holy Gospel in Jesus Christ, and merely mouthing any inverted text that pleases you, instead of following His Church's teaching, you have ZERO business "walking" somebody through any prayer. It isn't an office you're called for (vocational) much less validly ordained to serve in. This is spurious even in its method: "You are forgiven, all of your sins are washed away and you are a new creation in Christ." No way ! Absolution does NOT make a penitent any "new creation" in Christ; he has been one since BAPTISM. Confession & absolution from the minister of the CHURCH (priest) only restores grace to the soul; it has nothing to do with becoming a new creation. You don't know what you're talking about.
"The person listened to me tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ and came to be saved, and I basically give them the good news, that they are forgiven --I don't forgive them, I am simply giving them the good news." --More self-serving argument, based on human pride and private interpretations of the Bible. There's NOTHING scriptural about your "forgiveness". It's completely outside Christ's Church, in fact, profane !
The Church is whom the Gospel emmanates from, in CHRIST and His apostles. "It is simply the obvious--" NO, not so, Jesus addressing HIS apostles who are the early Church, and John 20, :21-23 giving them authority to forgive or retain sin is NOT obviously done outside the ordained priesthood. THE APOSTLES were our original bishops ! You may aspire to teach and bring the gospel to others, --all free-lance ministers do.
But you have no valid apostolic link to Jesus. He imparts authority to the Church. He says to the apostles personally, not by scripture, but at that very moment in history: "When the Advocate has come, whom I will send you from the Father, He will bear witness concerning me. And you (THEY, His Church) also bear witness --because FROM THE BEGINNING YOU ARE WITH ME."
The witness at the beginning is the Holy Spirit with the Holy Catholic Church and no other, not even the written Word, which was coming AFTER the Advocate (Holy Spirit).
Therefore, you have no cause to declare here anything "obvious" Debra. I hate to be confrontational, really. But you spread FALSE doctrine, --nothing but.
...this is like brothers and
April 17, 2007 - 11:02 ET by TruthMonger...this is like brothers and sisters arguing about who dad likes better...
Pretty stupid, people...
The right hand of the body of Christ does not own the entire body, nor does the left hand...
But if this is fun for you then please feel free to continue...
I certainly do feel free
April 17, 2007 - 11:08 ET by tumbler_2007I do feel quite free. Debra is free as well; and it behooves her as a good Christian to make herself open to the Holy Spirit. --He can help Debra out of her ivory tower.
I hope you don't object.
!
Hi TruthMonger, What you do n
April 17, 2007 - 16:44 ET byHi TruthMonger,
What you do not realize is that both, tumbler and me, truly believe that we are trying to reach the other one, so that the other one does not go to hell.
We are not being stupid. We are actually loving each other.
However, only one of us is correct. Our faiths, do not go along with each other's. Hence, one of us is wrong.
We are working this out and God sees our hearts. I believe that God will correct the wrong one here. And of course you can be sure that I whole heartedly, believe that I am the right one.
If we do not whole heartedly believe in that which we say we believe in, then we are liars. What you are seeing is passion. And even passion for the wrong thing, is a sign of a 'warm' person, a person who once he is on the 'right' side of things, can do great things.
A hot stove cooks, whether it be good or bad food. But a cold oven just sits there. ---djms
Debra...
tumbler, It is you who spread
April 17, 2007 - 16:39 ET bytumbler,
It is you who spreads false doctrine. It is you who comes with a false gospel. It is you who retains your sins. (And yes, as per Jesus' own words, I can tell you that you retain your sins, because you believe not on the only begotten Son of God, but rather on your 'church.')
There, you were bold with your unsolicited opinion of my salvation status and in response, I have been bold with my opinion of yours. Now, I am dropping this.
Debra...
Rosie, two words Captitalizat
April 16, 2007 - 00:09 ET by ChriswelLRosie, two words Captitalization. Punctuation. Google it!
-cs™
Chrisw...Google it!Beautiful,
April 16, 2007 - 00:26 ET by bigtimerChrisw...
Google it!
Beautiful, perfect and thank you....you spoke volumes...
Pow right in the kisser!
Sadly, Rosie just isnt very b
April 16, 2007 - 00:13 ET by jondelwicheSadly, Rosie just isnt very bright. Or telegenic. Or likeable.
Sometimes, permanently removing the microphone is the kindest move of all.
Yes Rosie...no free speech wh
April 16, 2007 - 00:15 ET by nicksmith112Yes Rosie...no free speech when Mickey Mouse pays you salary.
I'll believe it when I see it
April 16, 2007 - 01:04 ET by tracheostomyI'll believe it when I see it.
Believe it Noel.
1. She answers to someone else who has told her to shut that particular outlet down.
2. It's too close to the end of Bush's term. Anyone screaming "impeach" looks like a total idiot at this point. Not like she hasn't done it already, but. . .like I said, she's got her new orders. >;)
-PJ
It just occurred to me that t
April 16, 2007 - 01:13 ET by tracheostomyIt just occurred to me that the majority of liberals like Rosie don't really care about the fine details where facts are concerned.
If there's a few thousand poor in a certain area, well then "the system" obviously isn't perfect and fails to reach the community in question, so the problem area in question then becomes a target for criticism of the entire system.
The numbers are then (sometimes grossly) inflated to hype the problem and bring quicker attention, and therefore hopefully a quicker solution to the imperfection in "the system." After all, the ends justify the means, right?
Am I getting close?
-PJ
Out of the pages with the s
April 16, 2007 - 02:11 ET by Andrew H.Out of the pages with the style of Pravda--these liberals lie.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Two points.First I think th
April 16, 2007 - 07:36 ET by jiminjerseyTwo points.
First I think the scary part of "The View" is, while ABC claims it is an entertainment show, a lot of liberals (of course they call themselves independent) get their "news" and "facts" from this show and shows like it. Scary but true. This is why you can not debate a liberal. They believe what they hear on The View, politically incorrect, the daiy show, etc. to be the truth and the facts/truth are nothing more than lies made up by conservatives and FOX to further their cause.
Second, the system is prety close to perfect. Obviously their is no room for bias and prejudice. We all need to an opportunity. We can not deny anyone an opportunity. This doesn't mean every gets multiple opportunities.
This is the way capitalism works. We are not all equal. Some individuals are more intellectual than others, some are more mechanical, some are lazy, some work hard. Capitalism chooses which ones to reward. Sometimes it may take a longer than we like but having traveled the globe I wouldn't trade what we have for anything.
What Rosie wants is Socialism. Actually this is what most liberals want and Republicans need to start yelling about it. Draw the obvious comparisons. They are everywhere.
Rosie
April 16, 2007 - 05:44 ET by goldenthroatNever dance on an empty stomach unless it's a liberal.
"on the inside I will be
April 16, 2007 - 06:55 ET by fossten"on the inside I will be yelling"
Rosie, just know that while you are on TV, on the outside I'll be laughing.
My 10 year old niece types
April 16, 2007 - 07:46 ET by Long Island PeteMy 10 year old niece types in a more mature manner that Rosie
Pete
April 16, 2007 - 07:49 ET by Noel SheppardPete,
Where in Long Island? ns
Noel,It's where on Long Islan
April 16, 2007 - 08:08 ET by Gat New YorkNoel,
It's where on Long Island, not in.
Yer right on Gat - Jimmy H
April 16, 2007 - 11:59 ET by RackieYer right on Gat - Jimmy Hoffa is "in" Long Island
Gat
April 16, 2007 - 14:53 ET by Noel SheppardGat,
Would one say: "Where do you live in Manhattan or on Manhattan?" ns
She gets her "figures&
April 16, 2007 - 07:57 ET by Jack BauerShe gets her "figures" from the same place ignorant lib***ls get figures about the military.
You remember that ones thet trot out to "prove" that those great folks serving their country by putting their lives on the line, are in fact poor stupid, uneducted dummies.
When, in fact, the military has a higher percentage of High school graduates than gen pop. And the officer corps has a 97% university graduate rate.
But Rosie is such a genius, as witnessed by the statement below made on The View.
Isn't it funny how the "
April 16, 2007 - 08:42 ET by WanderlustIsn't it funny how the "civil liberties are gone!" chicken-little crowd manages somehow to get its message out the loudest, even though the MAN is persecuting them at every term?
C'mon, rosie dear, I know you go slumming on right-wing blogs whenever someone posts something involving you: after all, you are the poster girl for attention whores. So pony up: give us ONE, just ONE, court case where someone was prosecuted for exercising a "civil liberty" of ANY KIND post-9/11. Oh, and to be fair, I should spell out three (3) conditions to whatever response you give:
1. No heresay, or "I heard that John Doe got prosecuted", etc., etc. Cite the specific case number, court jurisdiction, presiding judge, and conviction date.
2. The action(s) earning the conviction has to involve a bona-fide US citizen. Illegal aliens are not citizens, despite your best efforts to unilaterally re-write the US Constitution; and
3. The action(s) earning the conviction has to have occured on US soil. Contrary to your beliefs, the US Constitution does not extend to other countries, including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc., etc.
All bloviating or crappy "artiste" english aside, nor any kittydipping lifestyle comments, rosie dear. Just the facts. Can you handle it?
Madness does not always howl. Sometimes, it is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying, "Hey, is there room in your head for one more?"
i don't think barbara walte
April 16, 2007 - 08:53 ET by kahoonai don't think barbara walters intended for "the view" to become a sitcom. but, there you have it!
rosie -- what a buffoon.
Rosie's obviously mad. Both m
April 16, 2007 - 09:12 ET by rbosqueRosie's obviously mad. Both my sons served in Iraq, one is still there. They do not go on murdering rampages killing civilians. I am offended that she would denegrate our military who have been performing admirably, sacrificing their very lives for all Americans. Something the selfish left does not understand.
Rosie
April 16, 2007 - 10:09 ET by iveseenitallLike the spoiled brat she is, Rosie exaggerates everything. Check out the things she implies about her family and her upbringing (on Long Island). She loves attention and feels sorry for herself without cause. She needs therapy, big time.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Rosie is a riot.
April 16, 2007 - 10:13 ET by Dave RFirst of tall, that pic is the best one yet. Looks like it came from the mug book at the local drunk tank.
Rosie really is the gift that keeps on giving. Kind of like the Cheese of the Month Club, only its delivered bi-weekly.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
yaya! Winning the war on po
April 16, 2007 - 10:25 ET by wiwfyaya! Winning the war on poverty!!! Gogo democrats!
Sorry, you had 40 years to win the war. We're pulling out now. Exit strategy for a failed war on poverty is capitalism.
That is a screencap from he
April 16, 2007 - 12:19 ET by ChriswelLThat is a screencap from her old TV show. I recognize the background.
Yes I watched her show, it was rather good before she became a raving moonbat post-Columbine.
Sad really...
-cs™
If Rosie O'D had a brain sh
April 16, 2007 - 12:54 ET by SnowWhiteIf Rosie O'D had a brain she'd be dangerous. What I find mind-boggling is that the audience applauds her unfactual nutty rants. Who are these people? I'm guessing her fan club must consist of a lot of her own kind of folk, meaning homosexuals, President George W. Bush haters, extreme left-wingers, and morons who run off at the mouth like they are experts at everything without ever having done any research on any given subject. I didn't like Rosie as a stand-up comic either. Wonder how many bodyguards she has. If she was ranting about the bad guys, how long would they tolerate her? Somebody needs to put a sock (it might take more than one), in that big fat gaping hole. : o )
Noel,Now, I'm begging you.
April 16, 2007 - 18:24 ET by Trix RabbitNoel,
Now, I'm begging you. Please stop posting the hideous pictures of Rosie O'Dumbass. They make my Gastro-reflux disease work double time.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Rosie O Donuts
April 16, 2007 - 21:16 ET by EvilCon555EvilCon555
Dear heavens ya'all...the only thing that went through my mind when I read her "poetry" was that a self involved 15 year old teen angst ridden girl was let lose with a pencil and paper ( a lesbian no less...how deeeeeep). How pathetic. She thinks this is "heavy" and prophetic? It's stupid. And what's worse you all responded to it. Ignore her - she'll go away. And ABC's advertising money will go the same route. Trust me...I taught High School English for a year. Nothing to see here folks... Just move along....
"Not the cry, but the flight of the wild duck, leads the flock to fly and follow" Chinese Proverb
Re; We have killed hundreds o
April 16, 2007 - 23:45 ET by M J BRe; We have killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Where do you get those numbers from?
According to the Lancet ;a magazine for the medical industry! over 650,000 Iraqis ,above the normal attrition rate, have died since the occupation of Iraq.
The numbers were denied by many but have withstood scrutiny.
As the numbers are now old it is expected that the death rate will soon rise to about one MILLION .
Tty this
April 16, 2007 - 23:55 ET by M J BTty this http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/
go argue
April 17, 2007 - 00:05 ET by misterbillthe most controversial being one conducted by Johns Hopkins University last fall that found more than 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of violence since the overthrow of Saddam in March 2003. Official estimates by the Iraqi government are closer to the 40,000-50,000 range. The discrepancy in numbers reveals the difficulties of counting casualties during wartime, particularly where civilian centers are the primary arena for battle. Also, given the politically charged atmosphere surrounding the Iraq war in the United States, this