Liberal Bias For What They DON’T Say, Too


For the last few weeks I have been watching two stories that, were they about Conservatives or Republicans, would have been scandals that would have shaken the rafters of the MSM. But, since these stories are about two favored Liberals, one old and one newly minted, we have seen no faux outrage, no shocked commentary, no calls for heads on pikes to be posted at the entrance to Congress, and no calls for resignations. Oh, the stories were reported all right, but all sensationalism was eschewed with the usual extrapolation to the level of a “culture of corruption” cast aside for a straight, newsy style atypical to their normal means against Republicans.

These two stories and the lack of passionate coverage of them by the MSM shows that the MSM employs as much liberal bias in what they chose not to cover as they do in what they chose to go ahead and focus upon.

The two stories I’ve been following are:

  • Story one: Dem Senator Resigns Post Because Husband Makes Money on US Contracts She Controls
  • Story Two: Senator’s Aide Brings Senator’s Gun Into Senate Offices

With the first story, Senator Diane Feinstein (D, CA) has resigned as chairwoman and ranking member of the Senate's military construction appropriations subcommittee over charges that she has a “conflict of interest” because her husband has mysteriously made a hefty sum of money as a result of military contracts awarded to firms he has investments in.

As the Patriot Post has it:

California Senator Dianne Feinstein abruptly stepped down from the Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee this week, hoping to stem the tide of questions surfacing about the role she has played in defense contracts won by her husband, Richard Blum. An investigation pursued by the liberal California press and funded by The Nation magazine's investigative fund revealed that a number of defense contracts awarded to Blum's companies have interesting links to appropriations actions made during Feinstein's term on the committee.

Now, it's good that, as the Patriot Post puts it, a "liberal California press" pushed this story. But have you heard it outside of California? I have seen this story all over the place in the right leaning Blogosphere. Michelle Malkin, Paul Mirengoff of Powerline, News Max, Judicial Watch, and of course Newsbusters. All have reported on the story. I have also seen it in the Sacramento Bee, and a small paper in California called Metro Newspapers did a very extensive story on the issue. I have also seen a few terse and short notices in other traditional MSM sources, but no sensationalized or editorialized accounts.

So, where are the Haliburton-like calls of impropriety? Where are the charges of the “culture of corruption” and the claims of the unseemly connections? Where are calls for Senator Di Fi to step down and leave the Senate over her “appearance of graft”? Where are the Network’s talking heads sternly reporting on this depredation of ethics? Where are the outraged pundits?

Curiously, they remain practically silent.

Who can doubt that, were this a Republican, the MSM would sponsor a drumbeat of attacks against the perpetrator of such an ethics violation? Who doubts that the Democrat Congress would take up the MSMs drumbeat and the news over the issue would be inescapable, showing up everywhere you turn? And wouldn’t this story be a natural one to highlight after the lie that the Democrat's handed us upon their take over of Congress? After all didn't they claim they would be bringing back an “ethical” Congress?

Story Two: Senator’s Aide Arrested Bringing Gun Into Senate Offices

In part, the AP reported this on the day of the incident:

An aide to Sen. Jim Webb was arrested Monday when he entered a Senate office building with a loaded pistol belonging to the senator.

Capitol Police spokeswoman Sgt. Kimberly Schneider said the aide was charged with carrying a pistol without a license and possessing an unregistered firearm and unregistered ammunition.

A congressional official briefed on the incident said Webb gave the gun to Thompson when the assistant drove him to an airport earlier in the day. Thompson, upon entering the Senate building, forgot he was carrying the weapon.

"To our knowledge, this incident was an oversight," Webb's office said in a statement. It said it had no other details.

An “oversight”? This is a claim that the MSM seems to have taken for granted as if this is all there is to the story. It has since been dropped like a hot potato.

Now, this story got a bit more coverage by the MSM than the first one did, but I found only one report that seemed to go beyond a straight just-the-facts report of the incident in any way. That was a piece by the Washington Post’sDana Milbank who treated the story more with lighthearted amusement than condemnation.

But most of the reports were matter of fact affairs that simply reported the facts of the case.

MSNBC , Reuters , The New York Times , The Hill, and the L.A. Times all took on the story with no hint of editorializing… again a far cry from what they would do if this were a story about a Republican.

The story quickly faded into the past with no more notice paid it, all denizens of the MSM giving Senator Webb a pass and deciding en masse that it was to be a non-story. This whole incident showed quite well that leftists really don’t care about individual candidates -- even their own -- but only about beating the GOP. Webb, despite what he has said in the past or truly believes in, was thought able to beat the left’s enemy du jour, George Allen, back during the 2006 midterms. On that basis alone they support him and continue to do so.

After all, Webb is very high on the 2nd Amendment and is well known for his off the wall positions on race and American history. In his book “Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America”, Webb comes to the conclusion that his white southern kinsmen should rise up and take back their country from whatever enemy he sees ruining his beloved south which would be considered a "racist" position if a Republican took it. Not to mention that Webb had been a Republican until about 5 minutes before he announced his run for the Senate as a Democrat. Also not to mention that he obviously is sort of a creep with his personal relationships and comportment -- which even this story proved by Webb’s quickly throwing his own aide under the bus.

Yet, the left was able to look away from what Webb really believes in so that they could support a candidate that could beat George Allen. The candidate did not matter as long as he could win.

Imagine what they would have made of this story if Webb were a Republican… or should I say if Webb was still a Republican!

And that is really the nub of the point of this story. The left doesn’t care about the facts and they don’t really stand on any principle as an insoluble point. All matters are fungible if they can be used to defeat the foe. The anti-gun issue would have been a perfect club for the left to beat an enemy in the Senate over the head with, but Webb is one of their boys. So, that whole anti-gun thing is forgotten. Being against corruption and ethics violations is great to use as a weapon against the GOP, but Senator Feinstein is their girl, so the issue is quickly and quietly dropped.

The left is just as hypocritical with what they don’t say as with what they do say and as one of the left’s most important allies the MSM provides as much cover as needed to score the win. Even if that means letting a good story go away… or two stories as the case may be.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'd like to know when William

I'd like to know when William Jefferson is going to serve some time.  A more egregious and clear-cut example of corruption can hardly be found, and after some two years, what has been done about it?  Nothing!  The two-faced weasels of the MSM hardly even talk about it.  A Republican in this position would have been hounded from office in a New York minute.

The situation with Pelosi is just as bad, and the MSM is even quieter about it.  It makes me want to scream.

ent, don't hold your breath

ent, don't hold your breath; that's another non-story now. Whoever gave the bribe may get punished, but Jefferson will probably escape with a wrist-slap. I am still stunned at how many people were convicted, during the Clinton mess, of giving illegal campaign contributions, yet no one was ever convicted of taking them. I don't think anyone was ever even charged with accepting illegal contributions. Such is life for liberals. Offer a bribe: felony; accept a bribe: yawn. Were Jefferson  a Republican, everyone involved, including the maker of the Refrigerator, would be in jail, or at least in court defending themselves.

In this era of Democrat party

In this era of Democrat party audacity and defiance  I'm really quite surprised DiFi didn't pull a page from the Gerry Studds or William Jefferson/CBC playbook and just stay on (or attempt to) despite the appearance of criminal wrong-doing or impropriety. That's become the basic Democrat party strategy which has evolved over decades in response to nearly 100% MSM loyalty.

Have a look at the words of

Have a look at the words of the "100% evil free" candidate those nutty Libertarians ran against DiFi 2 decades ago...Good thing the news media does such a great job of covering Libertarian candidates & libertarian positions on issues, eh? Otherwise we'd probably elect crooks or something. Oh, wait...
JMR (just earnin' the 'nick...)

WS:I'm really quite surprised

WS:

I'm really quite surprised DiFi didn't pull a page from the Gerry Studds or William Jefferson/CBC playbook and just stay on (or attempt to) despite the appearance of criminal wrong-doing

I believe that she DID, it's only now that she is stepping down after Blum is no longer involved in those companys to the extent that he once was

To piggy back on that, what

To piggy back on that, what about Sandy Berger? What about the Harry Reid land deals, or that Lady Bird Johnson is still the principle shareholder in Halliburton.....

"Before I refuse to take your questions...I have a statement.." Ronald Reagan

You'll notice, as far as Jeff

You'll notice, as far as Jefferson is concerned, that more attention was paid by the MSM and Congress-Critters to the "invasion" of the sacrosanct congressional offices than to the 90K in his freezer, let alone the actual case of bribery. Think about it for a minute - Jefferson was reelected after this corruption business came out, and there is also very little mention of his abuse of office in protecting his home and possessions during the aftermath of hurricane Katrina http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/5263.html.

As for the Webb issue, why is anyone surprised at the lack of MSM attention to a card-carrying Dem packing heat? No one wonders where the anti-gun journalists are who repeatedly say no one besides cops and the military need guns. No one brings up the fact that even if the gun is Webb's and Thompson was given it for "safekeeping", he was still illegally carrying a concealed weapon. Webb could legally carry it (disregarding the fact that the average DC resident is denied the same right), but his aide can't. The bottom line here is that Congress-Critters constantly consider themselves above the laws that they are sworn to uphold. Bribery and carrying a concealed weapon are just two of the many elitist hypocrisies they practice.

Last I heard anything about

Last I heard anything about the weird Webb was his whining about losing a boxing match to Oliver North, a true blue patriot, while the were both in the Naval Academy. Webb's whining makes him a perfect fit for the Democrat party.

Warner, this is the first I

Warner, this is the first I've heard of a Feinstein defense budget scandal, though considering Cunningham's criminaltiy, it's no surprise "DiFi" also wanted some fingers in the pie. I just hope she comes to the same end, as resignation from some committee now doesn't affect what she may have done for her husband in the past. Clearly, it was much more important for the news media to cover Anus crapping yet-another racist comment from his mouth & the Anna-Nicole Baby-Daddy stories over and over (while somehow never looking into why a doctor who prescribed an entire flappin' opiate pharmacy to a pregnant nutcase still walks free AFAIK, while this set-up legitimate pain doctor remains in a taxpayer-funded cage) rather than covering the actual news. Sigh.
JMR

Exactly what I mean. The DiFi

Exactly what I mean. The DiFi story has been silenced. They made a token effort to report it, and then they dropped it. If it were a Republican's ethics story, though, it would be on everyone's lips and on every newscast for weeks on end.

And it's important for the

And it's important for the lefties here to understand, the stories Warner & I would have wanted to see instead of all the mindless repeated crapola WERE ALSO SILENCED ON FOX NEWS. Warner Todd Huston on an obscure mediabias blog, not Fox News, did the news media's job of telling me what I'd already suspected anyway, namely that "DiFi" is probably just as crooked when it comes to military contracts during a war as "Duke" was. If "Faux News" debates were really worth boycotting as distinct from the rest of the TV media, don't you think they'd have served me something besides the pablum they've been serving-up for the past week?? Is it really THAT shocking to find out Howard K. Stern ain't the daddy and neither is Zsa Zsa's slimeball "bought a title" husband??? Sheesh.
JMR

I didn't know that. I figured

I didn't know that. I figured Fox, at least Britt Hume, had at least covered some of it.

You could be right, but if

You could be right, but if you are and I somehow-missed it, I've also somehow managed to see at least a dozen Anna Nicole Baby Daddy stories, as well as uncountabillions of variations on the Anus story. This means that even if Fox News breathed a word or 2 about DiFi's little issue when I wasn't looking, Warner's point still stands via bias in terms of emphasis. Political corruption is -- unlike the stories I'm bitching about and with the exception of the pain-doctor hypocrite-angle nobody but Reason covers -- important stuff! Why did Warner Todd Huston have to do the news media's job on the important stuff here?
JMR

I don't know where I heard th

I don't know where I heard the feinstein story before, but you would think it would be touched upon in the Sunday news shows. IMO, until the aged population (who do the bulk of the voting) that gets ALL their news from the big three networks, passes on, things will not change.

"If a man is a fool, you don't train him out of being a fool by sending him to university. You merely turn him into a trained fool, ten times more dangerous."
Desmond Bagley

sarcasmo - I can't give the d

sarcasmo - I can't give the dates, but I am sure I have seen both stories on Fox News on the Political Grapevine segment of Brit Hume's show - the best news show on TV IMHO. They were within a few days of the events occurring. 

I am also sure that they were also mentioned on several other Fox shows - Fox and Friends, etc. 

precisely the point, MSM know

precisely the point, MSM knows of the stories.  If they involve conservatives they are headlined for days and weeks, but if they involve liberals they get a mention and are dropped

Thanks. I believe you, as I

Thanks. I believe you, as I've missed that show lately. Still, the scandal, unlike the stupidity of Anus or the Baby-Daddy "surprise," never made it into the "lather, rinse, repeat" part of the news cycle on any channel, even Fox. I think it's appropriate for us to ask "why?"
JMR

YES, WHY? AFTER ALL ISN'T FO

YES, WHY? AFTER ALL ISN'T FOX SUPPOSED TO BE A RABID RIGHT WING OUTFIT...?!! THIS DERELICTION OF DUTY DUTY JUST DOES NOT COMPUTE...

IS THERE MAYBE A TIN-HAT LURKING AROUND HERE WHO'S "IN THE KNOW" AND CAN POSSIBLY EXPLAIN? WHAT THE HELL IS ROVE UP TO NOW...?

The word came out from Fein

The word came out from Feinstein's "office" that it was ridiculous to imply that her position had anything to do with where the contracts were awarded. That, apparently, is good enough for the MSM.

Good report Warner I've alwa

Good report Warner
I've always thought the MSM does just as much damage with their non-reporting as with their biased coverage and over-blown fixation on conservatives. They still are a force in this country, the would be "king makers" as they spin the news to fit their agenda. As they are in the process of trying to destroy Fox News, the only media outlet that you may hear about these stories on, I fear the situation will only get worse.

"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."
Groucho Marx

Don't forget about Sandy Burglar...

Another glaring "cricket-cricket" omission in the MSM is the continuously unmentioned, ignored Sandy Berger case.

Here's an obvious "Ultra-gate" moment (one of the many that can be connected to the Clintons); a high-level government official from a Democratic administration secretly removes top-secret documents from the National Archives by hiding them in his socks and jacket. He then goes on to destroy those documents. All of these are felonies and traitorous acts, especially considering the reasons why he was "reviewing the documents"--his testimony on Clinton administration actions against terrorism in the wake of 9/11.

Why doesn't the media work to connect this back to his old bosses (Bill and Hillary)? One must suspect how he was likely ordered to do "get rid of evidence" to prevent further damage to "The Legacy." Had a Republican been at the center of this, the media would have left NO STONE UNTURNED.

Cricket-cricket. The media's silence on this is deafening. And predictable.

Cunservatyve military medical guy

If you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul's vote!

Yup.  All you have to do to

Yup.  All you have to do to prove MSM bias once and for all is if it had been Karl Rove rather than Sandy "stuffy pants" Burglar the news wires would be so hot they would melt. It would be called the "Story of the Century", "The Zenith of Investigative Journalism" and we would hear about it for the next 50 years while countless reporters and news networks would win every award they could think up just to glorify themselves in self-worship.

Edit: FYI.  I just saw that Foxnews will do a report about Burglar this afternoon at 4pm est.

I've seen comments before t

I've seen comments before that the problem is that there is "no strong Rebublican leadership" in either legislative chamber. To some extent that is true. However, they probably feel as I do, that it does no good whatsoever for them to focus on negative issues regarding the Democats. The MSM will turn it around in their reporting and the problem will be seen to be the "evil Republicans". We will never get anywhere anymore unless the MSM is desolved in its current form. We are at once trying to battle the Democats and the MSM water carriers. It is disgusting.

This is a true statement. Any

This is a true statement. Anytime the right side of the aisle brings up lefty corruption, the MSM plays it off as Republicans trying to divert attention from their CULTURE of CORRUPTION. The one news source that can be trusted to make an honest attempt at fairness, FOX, is constantly derided as a right-wing smear factory. Look at the current Dem presidential candidate boycott of anything FOX. What would the MSM and political reaction be to Republican candidates publicly and vocally boycotting CNN, ABC, CBS, etc. because they were "Left-wing rags"?

What, exactly, do you think "strong leadership" means?

What, exactly, do you think "strong leadership" means?  Run away when the enemy bangs its shields and shows its teeth?  We elect these people to press our political views, and that doesn't mean only when conditions are friendly. 

Sorry, but I think your attitude is the same problem afficting most Republican politicans today:  they think they're "statesmen" and can't fight in the trenches.  Democrats have no such delusion.

The mystifying part of this s

The mystifying part of this story is where are the Republicans?  Yahoo?  Where are you?   Come out, come out, where ever you are? 

The Republicans may not be able to set the agenda in Congress or head committees, but there is no reason that they can't elbow their way on to the nightly news programs, speak on camera back in their home districts, muscle their way in front of microphones where ever they may be, and write op-ed pieces about these subjects.

But, noooooooooooooooooooo.  We hear crickets . . . 

And, they wonder why they were booted out of office in both houses.  Keep it up Republicans and you will be booted out of the Presidency in '08 as well! 

REpublicans

McCain, this week, came out swinging on Iraq and actually has the MSM discussing what he said.  That is surprising, even if they're only discussing how, what he said, affects his poll numbers, not the Democrats poll numbers. 

Everyone has brought up good points about the serious stories, on Democrats, that are buried, or not mentioned at all, by the media.  The glaring one is Sandy Burger, who has been given a pass by the MSM.  The pass he's been given leaves so many unanswered questions, it leaves one to ask "WHY?".  If this were Condoleeza Rice, doing the same thing to protect Bush, would it be buried the same way?  We all know the answer to that question. 

Newsbusters is successful because the media act in this manner.  I would hope that, sooner or later, someone in the news business will be forced to open their eyes and start treating Democrats and Republicans the same way.  There was a time when the media would report, with vigor, the flaws of both parties.  I'm not sure when they chose sides, but it's obvious they have.  I would have no problem with exposes on Republicans if there were corresponding exposes on Democrats.  That would be fair and balanced.

Never argue with an idiot.  They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

There was a time when the med

There was a time when the media would report, with vigor, the flaws of both parties.  I'm not sure when they chose sides, but it's obvious they have. 

PBT - I am of the firm belief that the 2000 election is the main cause of this extreme behavior.  Those who will always believe the election was 'stolen' have allowed their hatred of GWB to escalate their reporting to an unprecedented level of partisanship.  No matter that he was overwhelmingly re-elected in 2004.  So sad that our country is the biggest loser! 

It will be MOST interesting to see what happens after the 2008 election.

CCas i remember there was ext

CC

as i remember there was extreme under-reporting during the Clinton years, the biased world-view of "there is no bias, all views are equal" is what i believe to be the cause.  The 2000 election told the truth to the fairy-tale that if we say it enough it is true (we control reality) and that just plain pissed-em off.  Been escalating since

Thanks, WTH.  These stories

Thanks, WTH.  These stories need to be told and re-told until more people hear about them...most certainly we will not be seeing it on the MSM!  It is most discouraging to sit by and wait for a strong Republican to speak out against these 'errors of omission'  -  we could find at least a half dozen stories of corruption in the Democratic party that are going unreported.

I have been most impressed recently by the 'clean, intelligent, articulate' young congressman from Florida, Adam Putnam.  From what I have observed, he has a great future ahead of him in politics.  The Republican Party will be well advised to keep him 'front and center' as often as they can.  Every time I've heard him speak or read articles about him, I've been hopeful...and I haven't felt that way in a looonnnngggg time!

You are welcome... man THIS s

You are welcome... man THIS story has hit a nerve. We are getting a lot of interest in it. I felt that might be so when I was contemplating it for the last few days.

During most of the Clinton Er

During most of the Clinton Era, I used to watch a small TV station out of Washington.  I can't remember its original name, but for years it was called NET TV.  It was run by Paul Weirich, and had some of the best political stuff on TV.  Their news cast was a conservative's dream, because it was from a totally conservative viewpoint.  They worked basically like Drudge's site - they just read and discussed news stories from all the newspapers around the country and world (all valid sources like LAT, NYT, etc).  It was putting all the stories together that really demonstrated the total corruption of the Clintonistas and the Democrat party.

Anyway, as I recall, there was a huge story (in terms of importance) about Feinstein's husbands connections with the Chinese government.  There were accusations that he was getting contracts, etc from his wife's connections then, and I think it was even about the same committee discussed here.  I can't remember the details at all, but the MSM virtually ignored the story.  As mentioned here, they would give at most a few seconds on it, then a disparaging comment meant to show how unimportant/normal her actions were.

I was still naive then.  I thought when Democrats realized how corrupt some of these people were, they would push them out like the Republicans do.  Ha!  

Right on

Right, Iron lady. I worked with the liberals for years and I knew them well. But it wasn't until the Clinton years that my cynicism came to a head. I was shocked to see the media and the Democrats literally ignore corruption and criminaltiy for political power. I'm an old guy so I knew a time when things were different. In the past, morality and a higher good took precedence. The Clintons changed all that. The MSM and our politcians are corrupt, probably to the point of no return. We are living as the Russians have for years, under a Pravda-like media,  a socialist/communist educational system and government. We no longer have a "free press", nor do we have true "freedom" of speech or religion. P.C. rules life in America and the press rules P.C. We are being taken over from within by opportunists on every level. If Hillary gets elected---hide yourself as best you can and protect your children.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

 was still naive then.  I t

 was still naive then.  I thought when Democrats realized how corrupt some of these people were, they would push them out like the Republicans do.  Ha! 

Iron Lady, you nailed that one, it's why the whole "culture of corruption" farce is so sicking.  There is corruption on both sides of the aisle, but when it's a republican they are ousted, and even step aside merely for implication without proof (check DeLay were any allegations proven?).  When it's Liberals well where is Jefferson, Murtha, Sharpton, Berger, Feinstein etc.  They are still defended now THAT'S a culture.  

lying

Right. Lying, for example, has become part and parcel of life in America. The media lies whenever it is convenient, just as do the Clintons. (There are no bigger liars than Bill and Hill.) Lying, of course, is at the top of the Communist playbook. Ask your own young people about lying. What is their attitude about it? You might be shocked. Many, perhaps most, see nothing wrong with it. And our post is correct , you can lie by omission as well as commission. Our media and government do both. Sandy Berger is an excellent example. The Diane Feinstein story now appears to be another. With the liberals , lying is simply "so what" or "whatever". The "Rules" , according to the left, "are made to be broken". What an illogical crock. We're in deep soup. Thank a liberal for it today. And...

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

and a lot of the legislation

and a lot of the legislation is based on "what if" stuff.  it's like they are trying to set the exceptions of law rather than the rule of law

It's the multi-culturalist

It's the multi-culturalist / moral-relativist theory taken a step further. They start with "all cultures are equal" -- the immediate extension to that, because in some cultures stoning a woman for adultery is the "norm", all moral judgements are invalidated. Now, we have gone on to "any statement you make is just as valid as any other statement" without regard to any facts or objective truth. Unless, of course, you make a statement that could be slightly offensive to some group who needs liberals' protection because the liberals don't believe they can survive without the liberals' help.

I think I'll start a career of going on talk shows explaining why the sky is going to change from blue to hot pink on August 14, 2009. I might even be able to make a movie and get an Oscar for it!

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Hillsboro, Oregon

I have enough money to last me the rest of my life. Unless I buy something.

Inthomp

Right, Inthomp.  Relativism, Communism. They're not just back, they never left. Multiculturism is just a symtom of the disease. Socialism / Communism will get stronger if Hillary is elected. And the country isn't ready for it (or is it?).

NEVER,NEVER trus a liberal

IV  and it becomes self-feed

IV  and it becomes self-feeding, take national health care if instituted will invaribly lower the standard of care which in turn raises the need for a (liberal) government program to save us;  which will cost more and lower - - - and - - - raise - - - and lower  etc

The fact that Hillary could g

The fact that Hillary could get elected answers the question: "... if we are already corrupted". After all the expose's (sic?) of the psychotic/sociopathic dynamic duo's shady, cynical, disgusting and criminal antics (without much outrage I might add) can't get her pushed into the dustbin of history then hold on to your pantaloons folks and batten down the hatches.

As an aside I just saw my first HILLARY campaign sticker on a Toyota Prius.

 

ahusser,Just have to ask....w

ahusser,

Just have to ask....what was your reaction to the HILLARY sticker on the Prius?

An old joke...

What do you do with a "Run, Hillary, Run" bumper sticker?

If you're a Democrat, you put it on your back bumper, if you're a Republican, you put it on your front bumper.

Lame, I know, but funny in a sick, twisted kind of way. 

I looked in the driver's wind

I looked in the driver's window as I passed hoping to see a middle aged white guy wearing a greek fisherman's hat and a van dyke beard. I was disappointed as there were no distinguishing liberal characteristics to the woman driving that I could see.

ahusser,I'm going to have to

ahusser,

I'm going to have to keep an eye out for the Priuses, and their drivers.  I'd have probably laughed myself off the road to see one w/ a Hillary sticker.

I had to laugh at your post, though, too funny.

And I liked the joke. Someone

And I liked the joke. Someone sent me a picture of a sign on a KFC marquee:

" Hillary Special - 2 Fat Thighs with Small Breast & a Left Wing" The picture sure looks real.

ppswebsite for KFC picture:ht

pps

website for KFC picture:

http://politicalhumo...

scary

here's a really scary pic:

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-hillarybillyoung.htm

ugly is as ugly does!

expect to hear from John &quo

expect to hear from John "Ken doll" Edwards on this i think i broke something hitting the floor after being frightened by your link.

misterbill,I used to think th

misterbill,

I used to think that poor Chelsea got her looks from her father.

Now I see I was mistaken.

I wonder how much plastic surgery her thighness has actually undergone?

Thank you Forrest Gump!  Great pic.

ahusser,I just sent you a pri

ahusser,

I just sent you a private message how to link other websites.  Look under your Account and click "View Inbox".

Welcome to the board.

ahusser,  there is hope, my

ahusser,  there is hope, my sister (NOW member, liberal etc) who always tells me she votes in order to cancel me out can't stand Hillary, so there are some liberal feminists who see the enabling of Bill as anti-feminist.  Of course the true feminists (eg; Tammy) have known this a long time.   Since it is the weekend and blonde started:  Last month my grandma started walking 5 miles every day and now we don't know where the hell she is.

I know how you feel. My paren

I know how you feel. My parents and my entire wife's family are uber liberals. My wife almost choked when she found out my daughter registered as a Republican.

botg,Ooooh, la, la....a Hilla

botg,

Ooooh, la, la....a Hillary Bash!

(Or maybe a joke bash...I may have to change computers).

i may change my non-partisan

i may change my non-partisan voter registration to democrat to troll the primarys as the rep primarys don't decide much.

Where are the Republicans on

Where are the Republicans on this Feinstein ethics violation?  Thomas Sowell has a great commentary in the Washington Times today wondering why the Republicans are such wusses compared to the Dems.  They just let the Dems roll over them with lies and distortions and then don't stand tall when they need to.  It makes me crazy when they wimp out.  I think that is the main problem in Congress.  How come McCain is tough on the war (and about the only one), but the great compromiser on judges and immigration?  Are they all wimps? I always thought conservatism and intellect went together, but our Republican leaders don't seem smart enought to find their way to a microphone.

This Feinstein situation comes from Metroactive.com with indepth research and then it just about disappeared, even while the Walter Reed controversy grew.  It's clear that MILCON was in charge of military "quality of life" which was neglected, while she made her husband rich.  None of that was picked up! It's disgraceful that both the media and Republicans ignored her part in the care of our military.

Really, if George Bush had on

Really, if George Bush had only learned to use this single phrase properly:

"Well there you go again"

Great point

Great point, Watchful. I agree. Rinos are weak and cowardly. I also wonder why certain commentators avoid confronting Sharpton. What's the story?

NEVER, NEVER trust a liberal

Where are the Republicans on

Where are the Republicans on this Feinstein ethics violation?  Thomas Sowell has a great commentary in the Washington Times today wondering why the Republicans are such wusses compared to the Dems.  They just let the Dems roll over them with lies and distortions and then don't stand tall when they need to.  It makes me crazy when they wimp out.  I think that is the main problem in Congress.  How come McCain is tough on the war (and about the only one), but the great compromiser on judges and immigration?  Are they all wimps? I always thought conservatism and intellect went together, but our Republican leaders don't seem smart enought to find their way to a microphone.

This Feinstein situation comes from Metroactive.com with indepth research and then it just about disappeared, even while the Walter Reed controversy grew.  It's clear that MILCON was in charge of military "quality of life" which was neglected, while she made her husband rich.  None of that was picked up! It's disgraceful that both the media and Republicans ignored her part in the care of our military.

The answer to Sowell's question

It wasn't that long ago that Republicans wouldn't have allowed this constant barrage of phony charges to go unanswered.  Nor would they have remained silent over the Dem's and the media's ignoring of Feinsten, Jefferson, et al. 

The answer to Sowell's question is yes, they have become wusses. 

perhaps they are too busy RJ

Does not look like to they have the time RJ. The AG has to testify on Tuesday. The President will probably have to Vetoe 2 bills this week. They have to find 5 million missing email. There is a rumour "although small" that there is pressure for Fitzgerald to re-open the Plame investigation. So many things to do...so little time:^>

That's a rather shallow respo

That's a rather shallow response, shawn.  None of those things have anything to do with whether or not today's Republicans have the cojones to stand up for themselves and respond to phony charges as they would have in the past.  

Well what can they do RJ?

I'm always up for hearing your insightful ideas RJ. What do you suggest the adminstration do?

This is a discussion about th

This is a discussion about the larger picture of why Republicans have stopped standing up for themselves.  Reread the thread and try to respond with something thoughtful and in context next time, shawn. 

Oh RJ throwing stones again

I am saying instead of throwing stones about how Republicans don't stand up for themselves, what would you do that is so different?. Do you want to be part of the problem or the solution?:)

Man, shawn, that is soooo deep

Man, shawn, that is soooo deep.  I never thought of it that way before.....

Anytime RJ

Thx RJ, you taught me so much, I am glad I can give back for once:)

I've been wondering about thi

I've been wondering about this for years.  Not only do we have the RINOS like Hagel, Snow and Spector et.al., the others just don't have a spine!  Do they think having values means they can't speak up?  During the last elect they ran like lemmings over the cliff rather than stand up for Iraq.  Bush is supposed to be a "cowboy", but forgot that John Wayne didn't have to speak well or a lot, but did speak firmly and didn't put up with fools. 

IMO, a large part of the prob

IMO, a large part of the problem is that Republicans, from President Bush on down, have convinced themselves that part of being "conservative" means they also must be "statesmen" at all times.    Since Democrats understand that politics means you have to fight battles in the trenches, they have been handed an advantage.   Tom DeLay understood this, but not too many other Republicans seem to get it.

As i alluded to earlier Reaga

As i alluded to earlier Reagan would chastise the press for their bias usually beginning with "Well there you go again" he would then explain why the viewpoint was biased left and set forth the true position he was advocating.  Ah the bully pulpit, wish it still existed

There was a time when the med

There was a time when the media would report, with vigor, the flaws of both parties. I'm not sure when they chose sides, but it's obvious they have.

PBT - I am of the firm belief that the 2000 election is the main cause of this extreme behavior.

I think it goes back much further than that. The press was decidedly leftist as far back as the sixties. Maybe even further, but that's as far as my firsthand memory goes. There was the relentless coverage of everything negative about Viet Nam, with daily body counts, fawning coverage of the protestors, and an overall anti-American sentiment ... just like today!

The MSM might have been a little less propagandistic back then, but not much.

What about the Harry Reid lan

What about the Harry Reid land deal ?

"...move along, nothin

"...move along, nothing to see here..."

Say, did you know John Kerry served in VietNam?

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Hillsboro, Oregon

The history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.-- Mark Twain

The most grevious sin

The sin of news omission, of withholding information (not classified) from the voters, is central to pushing secular socialism forward... in some cases, entire stories are ignored, sat on or relegated to a small paragraph on page 9 or 19.

Nothong in the media is by accident. Look at the number of negatives on page 1-2 from 1992-1993 and then any 2 under Bush. The pattern is obvious. Bill O'Reilly confronts real numbers to libmedia guests... they deny the numbers or defend the indefensible. It is frightening to see truth so deliberately ignored.

I guess ; your damned if you

I guess ; your damned if you do & damned if you don't.

What an easy way to win a discussion! Win ; no way.

What they say & what they don't  say; phoeey!

Sigh...I am past tired of the

Sigh...

I am past tired of the spineless wussies in the Republican party.

I have called, I have written, I have posted here and a couple other sites as well, I have called into the Washington Journal more that once and expressed my disappointment and disgust.

Like Rush Limbaugh said, I'm not carrying their water for them anymore.

Buck up and grow a spine....learn how to win, this is a blood sport, see if you can at least not be afraid of your own shadow on a cloudy day and get a little bruised....you gutless wonders.

You have a more that one venue to get your messages out, try using just one, in unison, until it takes hold.

You hit the nail on the head,

You hit the nail on the head, Bigtimer--I have asked them to take me off their call list and reluctantly sent my last donation in a few months ago.  Our best chance has shown no fight at home. 

Liberalism is a convenient lie.