"View" token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck appeared on the April 12 edition of "Hannity and Colmes" to announce her co-host appearance on "Fox and Friends" and to add her opinion on the Imus controversy. Hasselbeck echoed her comments on "The View" that Imus deserved at the very least a long suspension. However, she sang a very different tune when asked about her "View" colleague Rosie O’Donnell and her outrageous comments.
Co-host Sean Hannity asked Hasselbeck about Rosie’s anti-Asian remarks and inquired if Rosie should be held to the same standard. "The View" co-host responded that "that would be for Rosie to decide" and noted Rosie’s intentions "were not malicious."The transcript is below.
HASSELBECK: I understand your concern. I mean, we're in the same industry. I believe that, you know, we're all out there saying things that, that we believe. And, but I do believe in consequence. And I believe that people have spoken. And I think that, that has to be respected as well. And the initial, the initial two-week suspension, not enough to satisfy. I just had -- I honestly would have more respect for Don Imus if he would have said: "You know what? I'm going to take a break. I obviously said something and I need to re-evaluate how I’m doing my job if it’s getting this sort of result and reaction, I'm going to take, I’m going to take a year off." That would be so much more respectable in my mind.
HANNITY: Can I put you on the spot? Even though you’re my friend and I don’t like to put you on the spot.
HASSELBECK: Why not?
HANNITY If that’s the standard, and I don’t think it should be, you and I have a disagreement on that, when Rosie made the comments about Asians, should she have taken a step back?
HASSELBECK: That would be for Rosie to decide if she should step back or not. I don’t, you know, Rosie's intentions were not –
HANNITY: But you were making that opinion about Imus.
HASSELBECK: Rosie was not doing anything in a malicious way when she made those remarks.
HANNITY: I felt that it was outrageous, but I accept her apology.
HASSELBECK: She believes -- she apologized.
HANNITY: She did.
HASSELBECK: Her intentions were not malicious.
—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.















Comments Policy
After watching this on Fox,
April 13, 2007 - 16:11 ET by MightyMouthAfter watching this on Fox, I have come to a conlusion about Hasselbeck: She is nothing but eye candy! Hannity and Colmes were drooling over like she was Brittney or somfin. Come on Hannity, no pen waving or nothing! Lame interview.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I watched the interview as we
April 13, 2007 - 16:18 ET by connmanI watched the interview as well and now realize why she is on the hideous View. She is a political light weight and most of all a hyprocrite. She should stay home and make little football player babies with her NFL hubby.
Yeah conman ? Got that Rosie quote ?
April 14, 2007 - 10:27 ET by SportPoliticsYeah conman ? Got that malicious Rosie quote ? got that freemarket is wrong explanation handy ?
Got Hannity and Colmes radio jobs protected ?
The free market and the people have spoken, and that should be RESPECTED as well.
No free market respect here, right ?
Now, youguys have raised a big enough stink about Rosie, that advertisers have pulled the 15 million ormore in ad dollars, right ?
LOL - OoopS!
I guess you want Hasselbeck to do that for you. It's HER JOB, right ?
Free market sure sucks this time.
Yeah, gee, she stuck with principle and is correct, but this time, everyone hates her for it.
Now,where is that malicious quote that offended Hannnity, you know the guy that no longer supports the free market ?
Hasselbeck in the interview - conservative all the way
April 14, 2007 - 16:18 ET by SportPoliticsHasselbeck in the interview - conservative all the way:
( more of her excellent arguments are on the second page in a reply to BT ) Time for bigtime WORD EATING. There's a MOTHERLOAD in her interview.
[ hannity> I know you like
politics.
HASSELBECK: I do.
HANNITY: You are the conservative voice on "The View." What are the issues that
you care most about?
HASSELBECK: By contrast, maybe anyone would seem that way, right?
HASSELBECK > I have an issue now with people just
tending to believe our enemies more than our own country in a time of war.
That's disturbing to me. I worry about this future election.
HASSELBECK > You know, people now are saying, should Nancy Pelosi be — you know,
should she have gone over to Syria? Should she have been in Iran? Will she go to
Iran?
COLMES: She never said she was going to Iran.
HASSELBECK: No, she didn't say she was going to Iran, but the potential is
there. We all know that.
COLMES: Have you always been a conservative?
HASSELBECK: You know, I've always been — you know, I consider myself a
contemplative conservative. And my parents were independent.
COLMES: So does it bother you when they say, oh, the conservative on "The View"?
Does that bother you?
HASSELBECK: Well, they can say what they want. I really am more concerned about
how I define myself.
COLMES: So we shouldn't be pointing at the other side, "They're like Al Qaeda"?
"Those people over there, those lefties, those lunatics"?
HASSELBECK: Well, a lot of it has come out since, you know, we're talking about
the surge now and...
COLMES: Yes, that's working real well. That surge is working real well, with
what happened in the Green Zone today, right?
HASSELBECK: Look, this is a war, OK? There are going to be battles.
HASSELBECK: Do you think we should pull out of Iraq?
COLMES: Absolutely, today.
HASSELBECK: You think pull out today?
COLMES: Yes, absolutely today.
HASSELBECK: So then we open the door for Iran to jump in?
____________________________
Do I need to go on ? LOL
SHE SMOKED CONSERVATISM ALL OVER THE PLACE.
I await my kudos for being correct.
MORE MORE MORE she is hardcore:
[ HASSELBECK: This is a very different situation. And I believe that talking
about, you know, not pulling — you know, pulling out of this war right now is
the most dangerous thing we can do, in my opinion.
COLMES: We disagree. How do you like that?
HASSELBECK: We absolutely disagree, Mr. Colmes.
Now for her Rosie slam #2
[ tell Rosie I said hi.
HASSELBECK: I will.
HANNITY: I mean that.
HASSELBECK: She says hello, as well.
COLMES: He thinks he got Rosie the job.
HANNITY: Well, I was there the day she auditioned...
(CROSSTALK)
HASSELBECK: One of my favorite days. ]
EAT IT.
MM,I saw it, too. Hasselbec
April 13, 2007 - 16:22 ET by Dave RMM,
I saw it, too. Hasselbeck, a "conservative", who one would think would uphold the idea of freedom of expression for all Americans, didn't see anything wrong with Imus getting canned because of something he said, but avoided discussing Rosie as if her life depended on it.
I still am having difficulty wrapping my mind around the fact that I actually found myself agreeing with Colmes.
And you're right about Sean. He wimped out big time.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
You know what, I'm asian an
April 13, 2007 - 18:44 ET by The TruthYou know what, I'm asian and I thought that wasn't even close being a racial remark. She's trying to be funny. But there's nothing funny about calling girls.... well, you know what he said by now.
you know what-- I'm not asian
April 13, 2007 - 19:01 ET by misterbillyou know what-- I'm not asian and I found her bit to be slightly offensive and immensely stupid. So did Michelle Malkin. I mean this in the best of spirit--you are to be admired for your tolerant attitude.
You're right, he did wimp o
April 14, 2007 - 07:15 ET by motherbeltYou're right, he did wimp out! This is what we have come to in this country, and I am sick of this scenario: Do you think so-and-so should resign, apologize, recuse himself/herself, for whatever offense it happened to be? And the interviewee responds "That's for him/her to decide." Just once I want the interviewer to scream at them: Don't dodge the question; I ASKED YOU WHAT YOU THINK!!!!! No one has an opinion any more; everyone leaves others to judge their OWN behavior.
Sorry for the shouting, but this stuff just makes my blood boil!!!
Ahh, Hasselbeck's life does depend on it.
April 14, 2007 - 08:31 ET by SportPoliticsAhh, Hasselbeck's life does depend on it. If she said "
can Rosie", it would be near as big a fallout as don the duck quacking.
Yeah, her job does depend on it. Right ?
Doesn't mean she didn't cave.
A smart answer would have been " When there is as much outrage over her.." - since earlier she said " the people have spoken and the free market has spoken " concerning canning IMUS. Then she pointedout advertisers pulled their monetary support.
I'm not sure where all the dissing Hasselbeck comes from.
Did you want her to say, " I'm angry that so many liberals whined and scared away 15 million of 50 million ad dollars, so they canned him in the free speech free market " ?
I'm not sure congress made a law on this one violating the 1st amendment..... ( FCC didn't do it )
I think she caved on ROSIE getting fired, and that's it. Otherwise she had a solid republican and conservative argument - unless you didn't like her putting down a racist lib, and moving the "racist republican" label over to the left side and making it stick there.. ?
HA -
And in the mean time, advertisers have flocked to the View. It has doubled viewership- hasn't it. I heard quadrupled this morning on FoxNews,but that might be an overstatement.
So, while IMUS blew off 15 million free market dollars, as Hasselbeck POINTED OUT on H&C - Rosie has given Hasselbeck -perhaps a nice raise.
Ah well, if you aren't a loud-mouthed hater,and willing to throw your employment away and give The View to 100% libs, why then you're not a conservative.
She agreed and nodded when Hannity brought up Jackson and Sharpton.
How much more did you want her to do.
She is OBVIOUSLY WAY, WAY SMARTER than the gaggling moron crew in THIS THREAD.
WAY SMARTER.
Don't wrap your mind around Colmes too much
April 14, 2007 - 08:38 ET by SportPoliticsDon't wrap your mind around Colmes too much. The Congress didn't make a law. The Dixie Chicks got virtually "canned" when republicans complained, and that WAS THE FREE MARKET.
Is CLEAR CHANNEL less the government than ABC ?
MM, For a couple of weeks I
April 13, 2007 - 18:08 ET by John in CAMM, For a couple of weeks I've been asking myself what her role on the View really is. The only thing I could come up with is that she's a mild counter view to the rabid liberals; and she's there in hopes some guys will drift by as their wives are watching and sit down and watch for awhile. So, yeah, eye candy for the guys - it's a trap. She's the bright, shiny object.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
I saw most of this pathetic d
April 13, 2007 - 16:19 ET by bigtimerI saw most of this pathetic drivel...she also would not say she was really a conservative, or a libertarian, or anything...she hemmed and hawed...I was cooking while she was talking, but I think I pretty much got that right, others may correct me here...she is nothing but a pretty face to fill in and pretend to be something she's not...and she doesn't even do that well.
I have never watched The View, nor will I, why should I have to anyway, we get all the clips we need here, and I do see them on other political shows.
When I think of her...or see her name..I think...SPINELESS!
BT,From what I saw, Hasselbec
April 13, 2007 - 16:27 ET by Chris NormanBT,
From what I saw, Hasselbeck should've stayed home, cooking, and you should have been on H&C. She has only looked reasonable next to Rosie. By herself, she was just a fluff ball and both H&C made fools of themselves in the mix.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Yeah, what is with that tan a
April 13, 2007 - 16:58 ET by mostlymoderateYeah, what is with that tan and hairdo of hers? Amazing how much better she looked only when she was inbetween lardy-Rosie and the other barracuda's on the View
To get shallow for a minute,
April 13, 2007 - 18:55 ET by dahliatraversTo get shallow for a minute, both she and Don Imus need some serious hair styling advice.
a little, yeah
April 13, 2007 - 19:06 ET by tumbler_2007Watching her tip along last night I began to see her as Elisabeth Plasterface; not Hasselback or whatever. Her face looked almost embalmed, the paste was so thick.
She's a Barbie Doll personifi
April 13, 2007 - 19:07 ET by gordonShe's a Barbie Doll personified. Perhaps she should see the Wizard for a brain?
Hi Chris..and thank you for t
April 13, 2007 - 17:02 ET by bigtimerHi Chris..and thank you for the compliment.
I would love to be on the View...it would not be that hard to insert yourself, make your points, without screaming or being vile, Rosie and Behar would be easy to take care of fast with words with a smile on your face while doing it... I wished they would get someone, anyone with some spine and knowledge to at least have a voice for the other side...but that is not their intention, nor will it ever be...doesn't fit the leftist agenda.
Just like you see political shows on msnbc and CNN and they introduce some of the guests as conservatives or republican when they are nothing of the kind...not even being a close RINO...John Harwood from the Wall Street Journal is a prime example..ther are plenty of others...how dumb do they think we really are out here!
It drives me crazy!
It's amazing, BT, that there
April 13, 2007 - 17:19 ET by Chris NormanIt's amazing, BT, that there really are people out there who believe the MSM when they identify someone, like Harwood, as a "Conservative". It's usually the kind of people who follow news and politics casually and identify themselves as "non-partisan" or "apolitical." Oh, and of course Liberals, who see anyone to the right of Howard Dean as conservative...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
You're giving Hasselbeck a raw deal - Dixie Chicks
April 14, 2007 - 08:44 ET by SportPoliticsYou're giving Hasselbeck a raw deal. Here we have a free market the people have spoken republican, who saw the full canning of IMUS coming and called for it. She said 2 weeks isn't enough.
She pointed out the free market worked when the advertisers pulled their $$$, she even named 2 or 3 of them.
You're all pissed she didn't throw her job out the window by saying "can Rosie".
That's about it. So, sorry she didn't toss The View to an all liberal panel.
Hannity didn't cave either. He put her on the spot twice, and she avoided answering in order to save her job. I'm not sure anyone HERE would have done any better.
As far as the rest of her points, two words, Dixie Chicks.
What a pathetic joke! Hassel
April 13, 2007 - 16:36 ET by mostlymoderateWhat a pathetic joke! Hasselbeck, I trusted you! I thought you actually were a conservative. Now I know why you act so stupid on the show, why you bow down to Rosie and never debate her appropriately. There is NO way an intelligent thinking person, using the logic God gave them, can find Imus offensive and Rosie NOT!!
Just proves looks are not everything! Hasselbeck, you look SO unattractive to me now.
Too bad she didn't fire herself, right mostlymoderate ?
April 14, 2007 - 08:46 ET by SportPoliticsToo bad she didn't fire herself, right mostlymoderate ? That's what you wanted, Hasselbeck to throw out her job ?
Any problem with her other astutely shared REPUBLICAN and CONSERVATIVE free market points ?
Why is anyone surprised?
April 13, 2007 - 17:06 ET by RJNo offense, folks, but I don't understand why this comes as a surprise to anyone. I watched exactly one "View" program a month or so ago and at first thought the reason Hasselbeck couldn't defend the conservative position was that she just lacked the brainpower. Then I pretty quickly realized that she's no conservative...she just plays one on TV.
The boob tube is full of people who "plays a conservative on TV", whether it's on news programs, talk shows, sitcoms or dramas.
Well , you're wrong as well RJ
April 14, 2007 - 09:11 ET by SportPoliticsWell , you're wrong as well RJ,but then why not just pile on with a non comment, right ?
Like to tell me what conservative point she failed to defend ?
Any of you crybabies want to tell me how much Sean and Colmes were pissing their pants about their jobs ? Hannity and Colmes agreed, didn't that tip any of you off.
Did the free market end after Dixie Chicks and the libs went insane like Hannity is going now ?
HUH ?
Boy you self righteous conservatives sure blew it this time.
Sporty,What's with the big de
April 14, 2007 - 09:24 ET by BlondeSporty,
What's with the big defense of Elizabeth Hasselbeck?
I wouldn't know her in a crowd of two, I've never seen The View and I didn't see this particular H&C show.
I see that she'll be guest hosting on Fox & Friends next week, so I'll form an opinion of her then.
Blonde the big defense.
April 14, 2007 - 09:41 ET by SportPoliticsBlonde the big defense is the conservatives in this thread are WRONG.
Got that ? WRONG. HYPOCRITS.
See the Dixie Chicks.
Now we have the rebuplican side when the free market pulled their 15 million, the republicans and libertarians(maybe) had a cow.
Then we have all the poeple who have never seen The View, lying about what Hasselbeck did on H&C, being perfect little babblebots.
Yeah, I'm DEFENDING a better conservative than what we have here piling on.
Ya wonder why Hannity didn't quote Rosie ? I sure do.
He always has the quote ready, but not this time.
Probably because Hasselbeck is correct, and Rosie was not being malicious.
Hannity didn't agrue with that, but boy he said he was offended. Glad you're so offended Sean, now back to that other argument where it doesn't matter if your offended and IMUS getting canned was wrong.
LOL
Golly, what a bunch of MAROONS !
Got it blonde ? I think I'll be glad to clarify even more.
What's up, Sport?
April 14, 2007 - 09:31 ET by RJPile on?...self righteous? lol! What's up, Sport, got a thing for Hasselbeck? Like I said, I watched one program awhile ago, made an assessment based on what she said, and promptly forgot about her. Sorry if I didn't record the show to assuage your overheated libido. ;^>
Sure thing RJ
April 14, 2007 - 09:46 ET by SportPoliticsSure thing RJ, youwatched one View, and said " Dumb Blonde".
Well, you are incorrect. And she is married. Two strikes, you're almost out.
Now, do you have a real complaint other than you haven't a clue, and won't address any of my points, and decided you'd take a cock shot instead, just like a moron liberal ?
Hey, you're just as much an idiot in this thread as Hasselbeck supposedly was on the 1 View you watched, yet here we have proof on you, and only your empty opinion on Hasselbeck.
No example from you, and no comment on point.
Did you disagree with her free market points on H&C, or didn't you see that either ?
Yeah, sure thing, dummy, perhaps a blonde.
Tumbler? Is that you? Have you and Sport had a Vulcan mind-meld
April 14, 2007 - 11:02 ET by RJTumbler? Is that you? Have you taken over Sport's ID? Have you two had a Vulcan mind-meld? ;^>
Sport, addressing your emotion-driven "points" would be on the same level as addressing Tumbler's demented "points"....generally a waste of time.
Yes, I made an assessment based on personal observation, which is that the woman is both brainpower lite and conservative lite. Unlike you, however, I have an open mind, and if she ever shows me differently, I'll change my mind.
Sorry if that's not good enough for your overheated, libido-driven infatuation with "barbie lite." You are amusing, though.
Not only am I amusing, I am CORRECT RJ
April 14, 2007 - 11:12 ET by SportPoliticsNot only am I amusing, I am CORRECT RJ, something Tumbler isn't, and you surely know the former by now, and we both have known the latter for some time.
Yeah, it appears you've already changed your mind. Nice slink into it.
I can't wait, Sport/Tumbler for your explanation
April 14, 2007 - 11:19 ET by RJI've changed my mind? Well, thanks for telling me Sport/Tumbler (that sounds like a glass with a big NFL team logo on the side), but now you have to tell me how I've changed my mind. ;^>
Edit: Oh, yeah. I see where you might be confused. I consider the term "conservative lite" to mean "not a conservative." No change of mind, Sport/Tumbler...
And no point, and you're wrong RJ
April 14, 2007 - 11:28 ET by SportPoliticsAnd no point, and you're wrong RJ, so you can sit with Tumbler the anti-racist moron hitched to all the other anti-free market idiot flip-floppers in this thread.
Let it sink in, and you can still rail at me for me attitude, not like I'd deny it or hide it, but let's see what conservative comes clean here.
That's gonna be an "in the future sort of thing".
Hasselbeck is also a hypocrit
April 14, 2007 - 11:38 ET by RJSure thing, Sport/Tumbler, but it seems to me that it's YOU who is doing all the "railing."
By the way, just to keep it real, Hasselbeck proved in the clips at the top of the post that she's also a hypocrit. Check it out, Sport/Tumbler, and see if you can spot the double standard.
See if you can name it, RJ
April 14, 2007 - 11:51 ET by SportPoliticsSee if you can name it, RJ. You have the outcry against Rosie to the tune of 15 million, or the people raising cane ?
You have the Rosie quote ? NO YOU DON'T.
So, see if you can see past yourself, and how wrong you are. I guess you need to speak up, and use that freemarket, and get that Rosie quote, to keep it real, which you haven't so far.
I admit that I'm having a lit
April 14, 2007 - 12:13 ET by RJI admit that I'm having a little difficulty following your half thoughts and run-on sentences, Sport/Tumbler, but try to stay on subject, because I'm not a mind reader. English is a great language, but you have to put in the effort to make the words say what you intend.
As for me, I clearly said that Hasselbeck is a hypocrit, and asked if you could spot the double standard.
Bailing again RJ ?
April 14, 2007 - 12:35 ET by SportPoliticsBailing again RJ ? This thread topic starter was - according to you, something not to be surprised about, but certainly you have not named one conservative light stance Hasselbeck has taken. So far we have your mysterious and seriously underpowered opinion based up on 1View viewing, whom knows how long ago ? LOL
Too bad, huh. You don't have one. Come on, what's that non-conservative stance Hasselbeck has ?
You don't even have a hypocrisy point that I didn't address yesterday, probably the first one to do it here at NB, I believe that is correct. Nor do you have one I haven't fisked or taken down in this thread today.
If you do, let it rip there loser.
I'm sorry that you have such
April 14, 2007 - 13:00 ET by RJI'm sorry that you have such dufficulties understanding logical thought, Sport/Tumbler, but I gave you my opinion of Hasselbeck, and made it clear what that opinion was based on. If you haven't been able to grasp that the first few times, there's no point in repeating it yet again.
On the other hand, it's you who constantly attempts to broaden the discussion out into the mental mess of your jumbled stream-of-consciousness. It's you who has not been capable of supporting your twisted mental leaps.
But, just like your mental and emotional brother, Tumbler, no matter what anyone says, you declare "victory." Great. I've never had a problem with allowing the deranged to believe whatever they want...I'm just bear-baiting while doing other stuff, anyway. ;^>
Now you eat the prize RJ
April 14, 2007 - 18:50 ET by SportPoliticsNow you eat the prize RJ, you were wrong in your opinion of Hasselbeck. You've seen the 10 fully conservative points she made on the H&Cclip, and not understanding, is you the piss ant moron who has to change his mind now, but will refuse to, because you are also a stubbourn liar.
Would you to tell us another one of your babblingly incoherent impressions as you blindly followed the lemming crew into the stupid barrel now ? Yeah, I'm sure you will, mind still closed, huh. LOL
Ready to admit your opinion has changed, or more idiot trolling and lying ?
Oh you people can screw off.
Hey Sport/Tumbler. Would it help
April 14, 2007 - 18:59 ET by RJHey Sport/Tumbler. Would it help if I tell you that Hasselbeck is cute? (not my type, but cute anyway) huh? huh?
No? Awww, man.....here comes more of your ranting.
Ok, then. I went straight to the horse's mouth (no pun intended...really!) and watched the video. It didn't change my mind, except in this way: I think Hasselbeck is trying to figure out what a conservative IS, and is forming her answers around that goal.
I think you ought to consider this RJ
April 14, 2007 - 12:01 ET by SportPoliticsI think you ought to consider this RJ: " The tube is full of people who just play a conservative on TV"
Along with : " I may change my mind in the future ."
And now : " Conservative light".
Which of course you, Hannity, Colmes, and everyone else is HERE, but Hasselbeck has not proven to be.
LOL - Yes, little conservative lights, the free market MAY CAN a person on TV and the airwaves, and when "conservative superlight" Hannity says he doesn't agree with it, that's HASSELBECK not being a conservative.
Then, when Hasselbeck challenges the quote Hannity was offended over, NOONE PRODUCES it, and by golly that same freemarket hasn't canned Rosie yet, but boy oh brother have people been calling for it.
LOL - Wow ! roflmao
Now let me get this straight - airwaves n TV Dixie chicks out= good / Hannity airwaves n TV out= bad.
Same bat channel. You must be proud. LOL
PATHETIC RJ.
Oh, Hasselbeck wouldn't say her boss needs to be canned, but then Hasselbeck hasn't seen the same market force reaction - because Rosie hasn't produced it.
Ahh well, maybe someday soon. Then Hannity can cry over it, again, and all of you can whine Hasselbeck is stupid, when it's really you whom are.
Wow. Wow. Wow. What an am
April 14, 2007 - 12:25 ET by RJWow. Wow. Wow. What an amazing jumble of run-on thoughts, Sport/Tumbler. I might have to change your name to Molly Bloom. She's the well-known fictional character in Joyce's Ulysses, who became famous for her stream of consciousness thoughts....not unlike yours. ;^>
Again. I watched Hasselbeck one time and formed an opinion. I expressed that opinion. It is that she is a "conservative lite" which means to me that she is not a conservative. Since my brain isn't fossilized, I'm willing to accept new input from her and change my mind. Startlingly, you somehow see that as a negative. I also spotted her double standard at the top of the page here. Apparently, you don't see it.
To my memory, I have never called for Rosie to be canned. In fact, I said that we should be careful of calling for that, because it could be the springboard for the left to attack talk radio.
Clear? If not, please get someone to read it to you.
That's what I thought.
April 14, 2007 - 12:38 ET by SportPoliticsThat's what I thought. Like I said, you've got nothing, and we both know it.
Well, it's clear that you didn't take my advice.
April 14, 2007 - 13:04 ET by RJWell, it's clear that you didn't take my advice to have someone read my post to you. Hey, no problem, Sport/Tumbler. Like I said above, I've never had any difficulty with allowing the deranged (or those with limited capacity) to believe whatever they want. ;^>
Elisabeth Hasselbeck is suffe
April 13, 2007 - 17:17 ET by CaringwhiteguyElisabeth Hasselbeck is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Really caringwhiteguy ?
April 14, 2007 - 09:14 ET by SportPoliticsReally caringwhiteguy ? Want to tell me why she was wrong ? Doesn't the whole audience laugh at Rosie ?
Wasn't Rosie making a joke ?
Isn't it reasonable for Hasselbeck to believe IMUS was being his usual old cranky hater self ?
Is IMUS now a conservative ?
Since Hasselbeck isn't a s*it talker like the rest, is she less than, or she REALLY WHAT WE NEED MORE OF, THAT EVERYONE HAS BEEN WHINING WE NEED ?
I am really disappointed with the people here.
You might want to look up the
April 14, 2007 - 10:28 ET by CaringwhiteguyYou might want to look up the definition of Stockholm Syndrome. Then again, maybe you don't want to since you've flamed damn near every other poster on this topic as well.
Sure thing, nice try caringwhiteguy
April 14, 2007 - 11:05 ET by SportPoliticsSure thing, nice try caringwhiteguy, she is surely identifying with her captors,that's why they interrupt and shout her down and completely disagree with her, every The View show.
YOU might want to look up at what an idiot you made of yourself, TWICE.
Thanks for playing, as long as it keeps being this stupid, the flames will continue to issue.
Other posters - - - Who is th
April 14, 2007 - 11:22 ET by CaringwhiteguyOther posters - - - Who is this pr*ck? Tim Hasselbeck? His profile says he's a conservative activist.
Hey, that's out of line.
April 14, 2007 - 11:24 ET by BlondeHey, that's out of line.
Hi Blonde
April 14, 2007 - 11:29 ET by shawn228I could not agree more blonde, I am not Sport Politics biggest fan, but that was not very nice caringwhiteguy.
Good morning, Shawn,What I do
April 14, 2007 - 11:38 ET by BlondeGood morning, Shawn,
What I don't like is taking a sideswipe at someone.
If you have a beef or disagree, be direct about it.
Just look at how "nice&q
April 14, 2007 - 11:41 ET by CaringwhiteguyJust look at how "nice" Sports Politics has been to many other posters on this topic.
lol - Oh well
April 14, 2007 - 11:35 ET by SportPoliticslol - Oh well.
Thanks blonde.
I've figured it out already, no argument against shall issue.
Delivery complaints a plenty, but no substance.
I guess that ends just slamming Hasselbeck on this.
Eating the words is already going on, no doubt about it. Too bad I'm not more tactful.
Sporty,Well now you know why
April 14, 2007 - 11:40 ET by BlondeSporty,
Well now you know why the State Department sent you that reject letter. :D
Time to change subjects, for you, I suspect.
This dog is done hunting.
The View
April 13, 2007 - 17:27 ET by charlietexasLittle Beth is probably afraid of Rosie. Rosie might sit on her or something. I don't know who watches this show anyway. I work. I guess its just stupid liberals living off the government, sitting at home with nutin ta do.
I think EH is indeed a conser
April 13, 2007 - 17:31 ET by SmartypantsI think EH is indeed a conservative, but she's just not very politically astute, that's all. She has certain issues that are important to her but, let's face it, she is not an intellectual heavyweight who is going to out debate someone, even a liberal. That's exactly why The View wants her, and she's probably wise enough to know that. The leftists who run these shows have no interest in putting a strong conservative on there, to make their liberal hosts--like Joy and Rosie--look like the bumbling fools that they are. EH is probably well-paid to do what she does, and perhaps she does not want to jeopardize that position for the time being.
Smarty,Not to even think of t
April 13, 2007 - 17:39 ET by bigtimerSmarty,
Not to even think of trying to pick a fight here, but she admitted on H&C last night she wasn't..maybe there is a clip on Fox, I don't know, but it was pathetic...the whole thing was.
I don't know if you caught my above post...anyway, just wanted to say that.
Big,Actually, I did not see h
April 13, 2007 - 23:09 ET by SmartypantsBig,
Actually, I did not see her interview last night. I have heard her describe herself in the past as "more conservative" than those other ladies. In any case, she gave a key speech at the 2004 Republican National Convention and has never argued about being called "conservative" in the past. I tend to wonder if she is just playing to the crowd by stating that she is not conservative, or if this is yet another example of her lack of savvy. One begins to wonder if EH even knows the difference between liberal and conservative.
What a bunch of piling on.
April 14, 2007 - 08:56 ET by SportPoliticsWhat a bunch of piling on.
You're all full of it as well.
She did a fine job, except for throwing out her job on The View.
Does anyone really want to argue that Rosie doesn't get huge audience laughs, where as IMUS doesn't have that advantage ? (radio no in house audience of libs)
How could anyone - especially a very nice republican woman/conservative like Hasselbeck, not see IMUS as a crude mean old goat ?
When Rosie is doing her left wing gig, the audience erupts in laughter, and that's what Hasselbeck sees.
" Rosie wasn't being malicious".
I'm not sure I hold any of it against her, other than, she went easy to keep her job, or at least keep it pleasant.
I've never seen more BS piling on from this NB crew in my life.
Now we have a republican in with the 3 dogs of the left wing machine, being pleasant and getting shouted down, making her points when she can, and since she won't throw tubby over the side ( she cannot - obviously ) - everyone wants to cut her throat.
WHAT A BAD JOKE.
It isn't Hasselback that is acting like a fake conservative or a blowhard halfliberal, let me tell you.
Did you object to her free market comments ?
She did a fine job explaining her position, while Hannity and Colmes fought to KEEP THEIR JOBS safe from the attack machine.
Let's face it, she wouldn't have a problem, she doesn't talk *hit. She said fire her if she does.
Noone has a quote yet, do they ?
I guess Hasselbeck is quite a lot better than the angry conservatives here want to credit her for.
Sport,I don't want to cut her
April 14, 2007 - 12:38 ET by bigtimerSport,
I don't want to cut her throat, she does a pretty good job of it all by herself on national television with her wishy-washy diatribe, if you can call anything coming from her mouth as any bit intelligent...which you seem to do.
Btw...You sound like you have the hots for her about like poor Hannity.
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
As an aside, this is not the first time I have seen her on Hannity's shows before, she is always evasive...she is about as smart as an empty card-board box as far as I am concerned...I have stated quite a few times before if she is suppose to be the one person representing the right side, instead of the left, she needs to grow a spine...let alone a brain.
Yeah that was specific BT
April 14, 2007 - 13:15 ET by SportPoliticsYeah that was specific BT. More emtpy mindless complaints. Not a single point against her, except your empty rhetoric, and furthermore, you left out of the equation every point I have made for her.
I understand everyone here wants a Reagan or Bolton on The View, able to talk down and talk over all the rest of them, but when Hasselbeck gets her view out, none of you seem to have any argument with it.
If you do, none of you know what it is. I didn't really need you to tell me your empty opinion again BT, when between all my disdain for all of you here, I effectively defended WHAT SHE SAID on H&C,which none of you have had the balls, the spine, or the coherence to even comment upon, and pathetically it took shawn228 to acknowledge it.
She slapped down H&C right where they belong, and clearly knew their position, and hers, and even "disclaimer" SAID SO. ( this industry )
So, as far as the spot referrred to above, she was the conservative, and the rest were not.
Gosh, now I wish I could believe you, but NONE of you said she was too meek on the View.
You just all claimed "she isn't a conservative", and of course, YOU ARE ALL STILL WRONG.
Sorry about that, but that's the way the ball bounces.
Pincipled conservative with the far better argument - still not proven incorrect = Elisabeth Hasselbeck.
( But we don't want the free market anymore with these crazy liberals controlling it )
Oh, well, it was ok when it went the other way, wasn't it. Now,one conservative that stuck to principle, and she is the one attacked.
LOL - Yeah, you really, really convinced me BT. Your opinion, yeah, just like a liberal, you are welcome to it, even when you're wrong, and even when I continuously point out why, and all you can say is " it's my reality".
" I've seen her before today but I can't name a single thing either about her that is a non-conservative stance, but you really,really gotta believe me".
Now this is the part where you cuss me out and call me some names____________________________________.
You know Sporty you and I sta
April 14, 2007 - 13:46 ET by bigtimerYou know Sporty you and I stayed up all night into the wee hours of the morning awhile back, and as usual you were screaming at the top of your lungs at me and sarc...
Glad to see you are showing your true nutty colors for all to see in the daylight hours.
You have a real problem with comprehending anything I said..but then again in my opinion you usually do.
You have real problems friend, I would check into the nearest self-help center as soon as possible if I were you...but thankfully I am not!
Btw...I could care less one bit about the pretty face with the empty head, I do not care where she ends up, she is a simpleton that doesn't even know where she stands on anything...in other words...a spineless fence-sitter who thinks she is something at the moment, when she isn't..she will just be a memory in minds like yours who seem to not be able to listen to the words she says...and just drool.
Want to get really pissy? Ch
April 13, 2007 - 17:56 ET by mostlymoderateWant to get really pissy? Check out the Mediamatters site this morning. They intend to go after every conservative talk show host with a vengeance.
mm...See, I told ya so!LOL!Bt
April 13, 2007 - 18:03 ET by bigtimermm...
See, I told ya so!
LOL!
Btw...did you catch the post I replied to you somewhere else this morning? The discussion about all of this with gf and me on another thread...I had to check out, but did respond to something you said this morning, just wondered.
Catch ya later...
Hasselbeck
April 13, 2007 - 18:03 ET by iveseenitallI've never watched Rosie's Pig Pen myself, but I had my suspicions about Hasselbeck. They all were confirmed last night. Hasselbeck is on that show to sit and look pretty. She's worthless. And Hannity should be ashamed of himself. I thought any minute he and she would break into a rendition of "Patty-Cake, Patty-Cake, Baker's Man" ( complete with slapping of the hands). Scheeze!
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Hi isia...He was pathetic, my
April 13, 2007 - 18:15 ET by bigtimerHi isia...
He was pathetic, my husband and I were talking about this, he acts like a high school boy with the hots with her all the time, this isn't the first time I have seen him interview her, he embarrassed himself as far as I am concerned, for all to see. I told my husband if I was his wife, there would be some major trouble when you got home....then again he made a fool of himself nation wide, that in itself may be enough!
Btw...It was absolutely shameless all the way around, pretty bad when old turtle face Colmes looks almost better....I said almost.
LOL!
Hi
April 13, 2007 - 19:05 ET by iveseenitallHi, BT...Yes, there are a few libs a on t.v. who really turn you off when you see their mugs. Maher is another one. But that Colmes---oooh! My wife can't even watch him.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
desert tortoise
April 13, 2007 - 19:12 ET by bigtimerisia...
I can't help it, I was raised around desert turtles, and had a few as pets so to speak, anyway, Colmes from the neck up reminds me of one...exactly, especially from the side, when he gets older and his neck skin loosens some ect, he will be a perfect replica of a tortoise sticking his head out...
LOL!
yep
April 13, 2007 - 20:15 ET by iveseenitallRight on---LOL
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Maybe you can explain it iveseenitall
April 14, 2007 - 10:06 ET by SportPoliticsMaybe you can explain it iveseenitall. You watched Hasselbeck. Now what exactly did she get wrong ? What exactly wasn't conservative ? Got anything ? I really doubt it.
It's the View. It's not the A
April 13, 2007 - 18:37 ET by balboaIt's the View. It's not the Algonquin Round Table.
No boa it's the Leftist Spewi
April 13, 2007 - 18:53 ET by bigtimerNo boa it's the Leftist Spewing Round Table...with a swine leading the way.
... Point taken, it's enterta
April 13, 2007 - 18:53 ET by dahliatravers... Point taken, it's entertainment.
But, Balboa, are you saying hypocrisy is fine in certain venues?
That same old liberal song. &
April 13, 2007 - 18:56 ET by iveseenitallThat same old liberal song. "What are you getting so upset about?Lighten up." Try something else, Bal.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
isia...He can't help himself.
April 13, 2007 - 19:02 ET by bigtimerisia...
He can't help himself...he just has to do this, it's his nature!
Um, no, not what I'm saying.
April 13, 2007 - 20:50 ET by balboaUm, no, not what I'm saying. I'm saying you shouldn't be expecting so much from Hasselbeck because the show is The View, not a show that promises high-minded debate.
Oh okay boa...well guess you
April 13, 2007 - 20:57 ET by bigtimerOh okay boa...well guess you needed to 'splain that to us folks, sometimes we are so used to you seeming to take the leftist point of View...hehehee
Later...got to get some stuff done.
Nope. See other note on this
April 13, 2007 - 20:51 ET by balboaNope. See other note on this thread.
Well babelboa blew it again
April 14, 2007 - 05:14 ET by SportPoliticsWell babelboa blew it again. I think he hates Rosie because she's not an attractive woman on TV so he haphazardly had what appeared to be a moment of lucidity the other day. He can't rap with Noel about Rosie's latest hot movie. But now Lizzie, well, you hurt balby's feelers when you talk 'bout that.
I'veseenitall and ye Dahlia are correct, and balboa is fumbling in his blind self-ignorance again, defending his moron marble as he assaults with more stupidity.
This is the type of stupid that you see on movies where the Dad cuffs the back of the stupid sons melon and tells them to shut it. LOL
She's a hypocrit and stop as usual telling us to settle down.
gump : you're expecting too much(settle down) -she's just a View celeb(hypocrisy is ok) - No I'm just saying it's not "high minded debate" ( cut her a break hypocrisy is ok..) see above saith the babbler
The concept and action no liberal like bal could ever participate in, high minded debate, meaning IQ above room temperature I can see it now, the slow motion swing and the idiot noggin flicking forward unexpectedly. LOL I could lay a stinger on the back of that melon.
Oh, and NO, I didn't mean that, that's not what I'm saying, see just above.
Wow...even better blabbity go
April 14, 2007 - 19:16 ET by balboaWow...even better blabbity gobbledy-gook than usual.
did you understand any of that?
April 14, 2007 - 19:20 ET by RJdid you understand any of that? 'cause I didn't.