"View" token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck appeared on the April 12 edition of "Hannity and Colmes" to announce her co-host appearance on "Fox and Friends" and to add her opinion on the Imus controversy. Hasselbeck echoed her comments on "The View" that Imus deserved at the very least a long suspension. However, she sang a very different tune when asked about her "View" colleague Rosie O’Donnell and her outrageous comments.
Co-host Sean Hannity asked Hasselbeck about Rosie’s anti-Asian remarks and inquired if Rosie should be held to the same standard. "The View" co-host responded that "that would be for Rosie to decide" and noted Rosie’s intentions "were not malicious."The transcript is below.
HASSELBECK: I understand your concern. I mean, we're in the same industry. I believe that, you know, we're all out there saying things that, that we believe. And, but I do believe in consequence. And I believe that people have spoken. And I think that, that has to be respected as well. And the initial, the initial two-week suspension, not enough to satisfy. I just had -- I honestly would have more respect for Don Imus if he would have said: "You know what? I'm going to take a break. I obviously said something and I need to re-evaluate how I’m doing my job if it’s getting this sort of result and reaction, I'm going to take, I’m going to take a year off." That would be so much more respectable in my mind.
HANNITY: Can I put you on the spot? Even though you’re my friend and I don’t like to put you on the spot.
HASSELBECK: Why not?
HANNITY If that’s the standard, and I don’t think it should be, you and I have a disagreement on that, when Rosie made the comments about Asians, should she have taken a step back?
HASSELBECK: That would be for Rosie to decide if she should step back or not. I don’t, you know, Rosie's intentions were not –
HANNITY: But you were making that opinion about Imus.
HASSELBECK: Rosie was not doing anything in a malicious way when she made those remarks.
HANNITY: I felt that it was outrageous, but I accept her apology.
HASSELBECK: She believes -- she apologized.
HANNITY: She did.
HASSELBECK: Her intentions were not malicious.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
After watching this on Fox,
April 13, 2007 - 15:11 ET by MightyMouthAfter watching this on Fox, I have come to a conlusion about Hasselbeck: She is nothing but eye candy! Hannity and Colmes were drooling over like she was Brittney or somfin. Come on Hannity, no pen waving or nothing! Lame interview.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I watched the interview as we
April 13, 2007 - 15:18 ET by connmanI watched the interview as well and now realize why she is on the hideous View. She is a political light weight and most of all a hyprocrite. She should stay home and make little football player babies with her NFL hubby.
Yeah conman ? Got that Rosie quote ?
April 14, 2007 - 09:27 ET by SportPoliticsYeah conman ? Got that malicious Rosie quote ? got that freemarket is wrong explanation handy ?
Got Hannity and Colmes radio jobs protected ?
The free market and the people have spoken, and that should be RESPECTED as well.
No free market respect here, right ?
Now, youguys have raised a big enough stink about Rosie, that advertisers have pulled the 15 million ormore in ad dollars, right ?
LOL - OoopS!
I guess you want Hasselbeck to do that for you. It's HER JOB, right ?
Free market sure sucks this time.
Yeah, gee, she stuck with principle and is correct, but this time, everyone hates her for it.
Now,where is that malicious quote that offended Hannnity, you know the guy that no longer supports the free market ?
Hasselbeck in the interview - conservative all the way
April 14, 2007 - 15:18 ET by SportPoliticsHasselbeck in the interview - conservative all the way:
( more of her excellent arguments are on the second page in a reply to BT ) Time for bigtime WORD EATING. There's a MOTHERLOAD in her interview.
[ hannity> I know you like
politics.
HASSELBECK: I do.
HANNITY: You are the conservative voice on "The View." What are the issues that
you care most about?
HASSELBECK: By contrast, maybe anyone would seem that way, right?
HASSELBECK > I have an issue now with people just
tending to believe our enemies more than our own country in a time of war.
That's disturbing to me. I worry about this future election.
HASSELBECK > You know, people now are saying, should Nancy Pelosi be — you know,
should she have gone over to Syria? Should she have been in Iran? Will she go to
Iran?
COLMES: She never said she was going to Iran.
HASSELBECK: No, she didn't say she was going to Iran, but the potential is
there. We all know that.
COLMES: Have you always been a conservative?
HASSELBECK: You know, I've always been — you know, I consider myself a
contemplative conservative. And my parents were independent.
COLMES: So does it bother you when they say, oh, the conservative on "The View"?
Does that bother you?
HASSELBECK: Well, they can say what they want. I really am more concerned about
how I define myself.
COLMES: So we shouldn't be pointing at the other side, "They're like Al Qaeda"?
"Those people over there, those lefties, those lunatics"?
HASSELBECK: Well, a lot of it has come out since, you know, we're talking about
the surge now and...
COLMES: Yes, that's working real well. That surge is working real well, with
what happened in the Green Zone today, right?
HASSELBECK: Look, this is a war, OK? There are going to be battles.
HASSELBECK: Do you think we should pull out of Iraq?
COLMES: Absolutely, today.
HASSELBECK: You think pull out today?
COLMES: Yes, absolutely today.
HASSELBECK: So then we open the door for Iran to jump in?
____________________________
Do I need to go on ? LOL
SHE SMOKED CONSERVATISM ALL OVER THE PLACE.
I await my kudos for being correct.
MORE MORE MORE she is hardcore:
[ HASSELBECK: This is a very different situation. And I believe that talking
about, you know, not pulling — you know, pulling out of this war right now is
the most dangerous thing we can do, in my opinion.
COLMES: We disagree. How do you like that?
HASSELBECK: We absolutely disagree, Mr. Colmes.
Now for her Rosie slam #2
[ tell Rosie I said hi.
HASSELBECK: I will.
HANNITY: I mean that.
HASSELBECK: She says hello, as well.
COLMES: He thinks he got Rosie the job.
HANNITY: Well, I was there the day she auditioned...
(CROSSTALK)
HASSELBECK: One of my favorite days. ]
EAT IT.
MM,I saw it, too. Hasselbec
April 13, 2007 - 15:22 ET by Dave RMM,
I saw it, too. Hasselbeck, a "conservative", who one would think would uphold the idea of freedom of expression for all Americans, didn't see anything wrong with Imus getting canned because of something he said, but avoided discussing Rosie as if her life depended on it.
I still am having difficulty wrapping my mind around the fact that I actually found myself agreeing with Colmes.
And you're right about Sean. He wimped out big time.
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
You know what, I'm asian an
April 13, 2007 - 17:44 ET by The TruthYou know what, I'm asian and I thought that wasn't even close being a racial remark. She's trying to be funny. But there's nothing funny about calling girls.... well, you know what he said by now.
you know what-- I'm not asian
April 13, 2007 - 18:01 ET by misterbillyou know what-- I'm not asian and I found her bit to be slightly offensive and immensely stupid. So did Michelle Malkin. I mean this in the best of spirit--you are to be admired for your tolerant attitude.
You're right, he did wimp o
April 14, 2007 - 06:15 ET by motherbeltYou're right, he did wimp out! This is what we have come to in this country, and I am sick of this scenario: Do you think so-and-so should resign, apologize, recuse himself/herself, for whatever offense it happened to be? And the interviewee responds "That's for him/her to decide." Just once I want the interviewer to scream at them: Don't dodge the question; I ASKED YOU WHAT YOU THINK!!!!! No one has an opinion any more; everyone leaves others to judge their OWN behavior.
Sorry for the shouting, but this stuff just makes my blood boil!!!
Ahh, Hasselbeck's life does depend on it.
April 14, 2007 - 07:31 ET by SportPoliticsAhh, Hasselbeck's life does depend on it. If she said "
can Rosie", it would be near as big a fallout as don the duck quacking.
Yeah, her job does depend on it. Right ?
Doesn't mean she didn't cave.
A smart answer would have been " When there is as much outrage over her.." - since earlier she said " the people have spoken and the free market has spoken " concerning canning IMUS. Then she pointedout advertisers pulled their monetary support.
I'm not sure where all the dissing Hasselbeck comes from.
Did you want her to say, " I'm angry that so many liberals whined and scared away 15 million of 50 million ad dollars, so they canned him in the free speech free market " ?
I'm not sure congress made a law on this one violating the 1st amendment..... ( FCC didn't do it )
I think she caved on ROSIE getting fired, and that's it. Otherwise she had a solid republican and conservative argument - unless you didn't like her putting down a racist lib, and moving the "racist republican" label over to the left side and making it stick there.. ?
HA -
And in the mean time, advertisers have flocked to the View. It has doubled viewership- hasn't it. I heard quadrupled this morning on FoxNews,but that might be an overstatement.
So, while IMUS blew off 15 million free market dollars, as Hasselbeck POINTED OUT on H&C - Rosie has given Hasselbeck -perhaps a nice raise.
Ah well, if you aren't a loud-mouthed hater,and willing to throw your employment away and give The View to 100% libs, why then you're not a conservative.
She agreed and nodded when Hannity brought up Jackson and Sharpton.
How much more did you want her to do.
She is OBVIOUSLY WAY, WAY SMARTER than the gaggling moron crew in THIS THREAD.
WAY SMARTER.
Don't wrap your mind around Colmes too much
April 14, 2007 - 07:38 ET by SportPoliticsDon't wrap your mind around Colmes too much. The Congress didn't make a law. The Dixie Chicks got virtually "canned" when republicans complained, and that WAS THE FREE MARKET.
Is CLEAR CHANNEL less the government than ABC ?
MM, For a couple of weeks I
April 13, 2007 - 17:08 ET by John in CAMM, For a couple of weeks I've been asking myself what her role on the View really is. The only thing I could come up with is that she's a mild counter view to the rabid liberals; and she's there in hopes some guys will drift by as their wives are watching and sit down and watch for awhile. So, yeah, eye candy for the guys - it's a trap. She's the bright, shiny object.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
I saw most of this pathetic d
April 13, 2007 - 15:19 ET by bigtimerI saw most of this pathetic drivel...she also would not say she was really a conservative, or a libertarian, or anything...she hemmed and hawed...I was cooking while she was talking, but I think I pretty much got that right, others may correct me here...she is nothing but a pretty face to fill in and pretend to be something she's not...and she doesn't even do that well.
I have never watched The View, nor will I, why should I have to anyway, we get all the clips we need here, and I do see them on other political shows.
When I think of her...or see her name..I think...SPINELESS!
BT,From what I saw, Hasselbec
April 13, 2007 - 15:27 ET by Chris NormanBT,
From what I saw, Hasselbeck should've stayed home, cooking, and you should have been on H&C. She has only looked reasonable next to Rosie. By herself, she was just a fluff ball and both H&C made fools of themselves in the mix.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Yeah, what is with that tan a
April 13, 2007 - 15:58 ET by mostlymoderateYeah, what is with that tan and hairdo of hers? Amazing how much better she looked only when she was inbetween lardy-Rosie and the other barracuda's on the View
To get shallow for a minute,
April 13, 2007 - 17:55 ET by dahliatraversTo get shallow for a minute, both she and Don Imus need some serious hair styling advice.
a little, yeah
April 13, 2007 - 18:06 ET by tumbler_2007Watching her tip along last night I began to see her as Elisabeth Plasterface; not Hasselback or whatever. Her face looked almost embalmed, the paste was so thick.
She's a Barbie Doll personifi
April 13, 2007 - 18:07 ET by gordonShe's a Barbie Doll personified. Perhaps she should see the Wizard for a brain?
Hi Chris..and thank you for t
April 13, 2007 - 16:02 ET by bigtimerHi Chris..and thank you for the compliment.
I would love to be on the View...it would not be that hard to insert yourself, make your points, without screaming or being vile, Rosie and Behar would be easy to take care of fast with words with a smile on your face while doing it... I wished they would get someone, anyone with some spine and knowledge to at least have a voice for the other side...but that is not their intention, nor will it ever be...doesn't fit the leftist agenda.
Just like you see political shows on msnbc and CNN and they introduce some of the guests as conservatives or republican when they are nothing of the kind...not even being a close RINO...John Harwood from the Wall Street Journal is a prime example..ther are plenty of others...how dumb do they think we really are out here!
It drives me crazy!
It's amazing, BT, that there
April 13, 2007 - 16:19 ET by Chris NormanIt's amazing, BT, that there really are people out there who believe the MSM when they identify someone, like Harwood, as a "Conservative". It's usually the kind of people who follow news and politics casually and identify themselves as "non-partisan" or "apolitical." Oh, and of course Liberals, who see anyone to the right of Howard Dean as conservative...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
You're giving Hasselbeck a raw deal - Dixie Chicks
April 14, 2007 - 07:44 ET by SportPoliticsYou're giving Hasselbeck a raw deal. Here we have a free market the people have spoken republican, who saw the full canning of IMUS coming and called for it. She said 2 weeks isn't enough.
She pointed out the free market worked when the advertisers pulled their $$$, she even named 2 or 3 of them.
You're all pissed she didn't throw her job out the window by saying "can Rosie".
That's about it. So, sorry she didn't toss The View to an all liberal panel.
Hannity didn't cave either. He put her on the spot twice, and she avoided answering in order to save her job. I'm not sure anyone HERE would have done any better.
As far as the rest of her points, two words, Dixie Chicks.
What a pathetic joke! Hassel
April 13, 2007 - 15:36 ET by mostlymoderateWhat a pathetic joke! Hasselbeck, I trusted you! I thought you actually were a conservative. Now I know why you act so stupid on the show, why you bow down to Rosie and never debate her appropriately. There is NO way an intelligent thinking person, using the logic God gave them, can find Imus offensive and Rosie NOT!!
Just proves looks are not everything! Hasselbeck, you look SO unattractive to me now.
Too bad she didn't fire herself, right mostlymoderate ?
April 14, 2007 - 07:46 ET by SportPoliticsToo bad she didn't fire herself, right mostlymoderate ? That's what you wanted, Hasselbeck to throw out her job ?
Any problem with her other astutely shared REPUBLICAN and CONSERVATIVE free market points ?
Why is anyone surprised?
April 13, 2007 - 16:06 ET by RJNo offense, folks, but I don't understand why this comes as a surprise to anyone. I watched exactly one "View" program a month or so ago and at first thought the reason Hasselbeck couldn't defend the conservative position was that she just lacked the brainpower. Then I pretty quickly realized that she's no conservative...she just plays one on TV.
The boob tube is full of people who "plays a conservative on TV", whether it's on news programs, talk shows, sitcoms or dramas.
Well , you're wrong as well RJ
April 14, 2007 - 08:11 ET by SportPoliticsWell , you're wrong as well RJ,but then why not just pile on with a non comment, right ?
Like to tell me what conservative point she failed to defend ?
Any of you crybabies want to tell me how much Sean and Colmes were pissing their pants about their jobs ? Hannity and Colmes agreed, didn't that tip any of you off.
Did the free market end after Dixie Chicks and the libs went insane like Hannity is going now ?
HUH ?
Boy you self righteous conservatives sure blew it this time.
Sporty,What's with the big de
April 14, 2007 - 08:24 ET by BlondeSporty,
What's with the big defense of Elizabeth Hasselbeck?
I wouldn't know her in a crowd of two, I've never seen The View and I didn't see this particular H&C show.
I see that she'll be guest hosting on Fox & Friends next week, so I'll form an opinion of her then.
Blonde the big defense.
April 14, 2007 - 08:41 ET by SportPoliticsBlonde the big defense is the conservatives in this thread are WRONG.
Got that ? WRONG. HYPOCRITS.
See the Dixie Chicks.
Now we have the rebuplican side when the free market pulled their 15 million, the republicans and libertarians(maybe) had a cow.
Then we have all the poeple who have never seen The View, lying about what Hasselbeck did on H&C, being perfect little babblebots.
Yeah, I'm DEFENDING a better conservative than what we have here piling on.
Ya wonder why Hannity didn't quote Rosie ? I sure do.
He always has the quote ready, but not this time.
Probably because Hasselbeck is correct, and Rosie was not being malicious.
Hannity didn't agrue with that, but boy he said he was offended. Glad you're so offended Sean, now back to that other argument where it doesn't matter if your offended and IMUS getting canned was wrong.
LOL
Golly, what a bunch of MAROONS !
Got it blonde ? I think I'll be glad to clarify even more.
What's up, Sport?
April 14, 2007 - 08:31 ET by RJPile on?...self righteous? lol! What's up, Sport, got a thing for Hasselbeck? Like I said, I watched one program awhile ago, made an assessment based on what she said, and promptly forgot about her. Sorry if I didn't record the show to assuage your overheated libido. ;^>
Sure thing RJ
April 14, 2007 - 08:46 ET by SportPoliticsSure thing RJ, youwatched one View, and said " Dumb Blonde".
Well, you are incorrect. And she is married. Two strikes, you're almost out.
Now, do you have a real complaint other than you haven't a clue, and won't address any of my points, and decided you'd take a cock shot instead, just like a moron liberal ?
Hey, you're just as much an idiot in this thread as Hasselbeck supposedly was on the 1 View you watched, yet here we have proof on you, and only your empty opinion on Hasselbeck.
No example from you, and no comment on point.
Did you disagree with her free market points on H&C, or didn't you see that either ?
Yeah, sure thing, dummy, perhaps a blonde.
Tumbler? Is that you? Have you and Sport had a Vulcan mind-meld
April 14, 2007 - 10:02 ET by RJTumbler? Is that you? Have you taken over Sport's ID? Have you two had a Vulcan mind-meld? ;^>
Sport, addressing your emotion-driven "points" would be on the same level as addressing Tumbler's demented "points"....generally a waste of time.
Yes, I made an assessment based on personal observation, which is that the woman is both brainpower lite and conservative lite. Unlike you, however, I have an open mind, and if she ever shows me differently, I'll change my mind.
Sorry if that's not good enough for your overheated, libido-driven infatuation with "barbie lite." You are amusing, though.
Not only am I amusing, I am CORRECT RJ
April 14, 2007 - 10:12 ET by SportPoliticsNot only am I amusing, I am CORRECT RJ, something Tumbler isn't, and you surely know the former by now, and we both have known the latter for some time.
Yeah, it appears you've already changed your mind. Nice slink into it.
I can't wait, Sport/Tumbler for your explanation
April 14, 2007 - 10:19 ET by RJI've changed my mind? Well, thanks for telling me Sport/Tumbler (that sounds like a glass with a big NFL team logo on the side), but now you have to tell me how I've changed my mind. ;^>
Edit: Oh, yeah. I see where you might be confused. I consider the term "conservative lite" to mean "not a conservative." No change of mind, Sport/Tumbler...
And no point, and you're wrong RJ
April 14, 2007 - 10:28 ET by SportPoliticsAnd no point, and you're wrong RJ, so you can sit with Tumbler the anti-racist moron hitched to all the other anti-free market idiot flip-floppers in this thread.
Let it sink in, and you can still rail at me for me attitude, not like I'd deny it or hide it, but let's see what conservative comes clean here.
That's gonna be an "in the future sort of thing".
Hasselbeck is also a hypocrit
April 14, 2007 - 10:38 ET by RJSure thing, Sport/Tumbler, but it seems to me that it's YOU who is doing all the "railing."
By the way, just to keep it real, Hasselbeck proved in the clips at the top of the post that she's also a hypocrit. Check it out, Sport/Tumbler, and see if you can spot the double standard.
See if you can name it, RJ
April 14, 2007 - 10:51 ET by SportPoliticsSee if you can name it, RJ. You have the outcry against Rosie to the tune of 15 million, or the people raising cane ?
You have the Rosie quote ? NO YOU DON'T.
So, see if you can see past yourself, and how wrong you are. I guess you need to speak up, and use that freemarket, and get that Rosie quote, to keep it real, which you haven't so far.
I admit that I'm having a lit
April 14, 2007 - 11:13 ET by RJI admit that I'm having a little difficulty following your half thoughts and run-on sentences, Sport/Tumbler, but try to stay on subject, because I'm not a mind reader. English is a great language, but you have to put in the effort to make the words say what you intend.
As for me, I clearly said that Hasselbeck is a hypocrit, and asked if you could spot the double standard.
Bailing again RJ ?
April 14, 2007 - 11:35 ET by SportPoliticsBailing again RJ ? This thread topic starter was - according to you, something not to be surprised about, but certainly you have not named one conservative light stance Hasselbeck has taken. So far we have your mysterious and seriously underpowered opinion based up on 1View viewing, whom knows how long ago ? LOL
Too bad, huh. You don't have one. Come on, what's that non-conservative stance Hasselbeck has ?
You don't even have a hypocrisy point that I didn't address yesterday, probably the first one to do it here at NB, I believe that is correct. Nor do you have one I haven't fisked or taken down in this thread today.
If you do, let it rip there loser.
I'm sorry that you have such
April 14, 2007 - 12:00 ET by RJI'm sorry that you have such dufficulties understanding logical thought, Sport/Tumbler, but I gave you my opinion of Hasselbeck, and made it clear what that opinion was based on. If you haven't been able to grasp that the first few times, there's no point in repeating it yet again.
On the other hand, it's you who constantly attempts to broaden the discussion out into the mental mess of your jumbled stream-of-consciousness. It's you who has not been capable of supporting your twisted mental leaps.
But, just like your mental and emotional brother, Tumbler, no matter what anyone says, you declare "victory." Great. I've never had a problem with allowing the deranged to believe whatever they want...I'm just bear-baiting while doing other stuff, anyway. ;^>
Now you eat the prize RJ
April 14, 2007 - 17:50 ET by SportPoliticsNow you eat the prize RJ, you were wrong in your opinion of Hasselbeck. You've seen the 10 fully conservative points she made on the H&Cclip, and not understanding, is you the piss ant moron who has to change his mind now, but will refuse to, because you are also a stubbourn liar.
Would you to tell us another one of your babblingly incoherent impressions as you blindly followed the lemming crew into the stupid barrel now ? Yeah, I'm sure you will, mind still closed, huh. LOL
Ready to admit your opinion has changed, or more idiot trolling and lying ?
Oh you people can screw off.
Hey Sport/Tumbler. Would it help
April 14, 2007 - 17:59 ET by RJHey Sport/Tumbler. Would it help if I tell you that Hasselbeck is cute? (not my type, but cute anyway) huh? huh?
No? Awww, man.....here comes more of your ranting.
Ok, then. I went straight to the horse's mouth (no pun intended...really!) and watched the video. It didn't change my mind, except in this way: I think Hasselbeck is trying to figure out what a conservative IS, and is forming her answers around that goal.
I think you ought to consider this RJ
April 14, 2007 - 11:01 ET by SportPoliticsI think you ought to consider this RJ: " The tube is full of people who just play a conservative on TV"
Along with : " I may change my mind in the future ."
And now : " Conservative light".
Which of course you, Hannity, Colmes, and everyone else is HERE, but Hasselbeck has not proven to be.
LOL - Yes, little conservative lights, the free market MAY CAN a person on TV and the airwaves, and when "conservative superlight" Hannity says he doesn't agree with it, that's HASSELBECK not being a conservative.
Then, when Hasselbeck challenges the quote Hannity was offended over, NOONE PRODUCES it, and by golly that same freemarket hasn't canned Rosie yet, but boy oh brother have people been calling for it.
LOL - Wow ! roflmao
Now let me get this straight - airwaves n TV Dixie chicks out= good / Hannity airwaves n TV out= bad.
Same bat channel. You must be proud. LOL
PATHETIC RJ.
Oh, Hasselbeck wouldn't say her boss needs to be canned, but then Hasselbeck hasn't seen the same market force reaction - because Rosie hasn't produced it.
Ahh well, maybe someday soon. Then Hannity can cry over it, again, and all of you can whine Hasselbeck is stupid, when it's really you whom are.
Wow. Wow. Wow. What an am
April 14, 2007 - 11:25 ET by RJWow. Wow. Wow. What an amazing jumble of run-on thoughts, Sport/Tumbler. I might have to change your name to Molly Bloom. She's the well-known fictional character in Joyce's Ulysses, who became famous for her stream of consciousness thoughts....not unlike yours. ;^>
Again. I watched Hasselbeck one time and formed an opinion. I expressed that opinion. It is that she is a "conservative lite" which means to me that she is not a conservative. Since my brain isn't fossilized, I'm willing to accept new input from her and change my mind. Startlingly, you somehow see that as a negative. I also spotted her double standard at the top of the page here. Apparently, you don't see it.
To my memory, I have never called for Rosie to be canned. In fact, I said that we should be careful of calling for that, because it could be the springboard for the left to attack talk radio.
Clear? If not, please get someone to read it to you.
That's what I thought.
April 14, 2007 - 11:38 ET by SportPoliticsThat's what I thought. Like I said, you've got nothing, and we both know it.
Well, it's clear that you didn't take my advice.
April 14, 2007 - 12:04 ET by RJWell, it's clear that you didn't take my advice to have someone read my post to you. Hey, no problem, Sport/Tumbler. Like I said above, I've never had any difficulty with allowing the deranged (or those with limited capacity) to believe whatever they want. ;^>
Elisabeth Hasselbeck is suffe
April 13, 2007 - 16:17 ET by CaringwhiteguyElisabeth Hasselbeck is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
Really caringwhiteguy ?
April 14, 2007 - 08:14 ET by SportPoliticsReally caringwhiteguy ? Want to tell me why she was wrong ? Doesn't the whole audience laugh at Rosie ?
Wasn't Rosie making a joke ?
Isn't it reasonable for Hasselbeck to believe IMUS was being his usual old cranky hater self ?
Is IMUS now a conservative ?
Since Hasselbeck isn't a s*it talker like the rest, is she less than, or she REALLY WHAT WE NEED MORE OF, THAT EVERYONE HAS BEEN WHINING WE NEED ?
I am really disappointed with the people here.
You might want to look up the
April 14, 2007 - 09:28 ET by CaringwhiteguyYou might want to look up the definition of Stockholm Syndrome. Then again, maybe you don't want to since you've flamed damn near every other poster on this topic as well.
Sure thing, nice try caringwhiteguy
April 14, 2007 - 10:05 ET by SportPoliticsSure thing, nice try caringwhiteguy, she is surely identifying with her captors,that's why they interrupt and shout her down and completely disagree with her, every The View show.
YOU might want to look up at what an idiot you made of yourself, TWICE.
Thanks for playing, as long as it keeps being this stupid, the flames will continue to issue.
Other posters - - - Who is th
April 14, 2007 - 10:22 ET by CaringwhiteguyOther posters - - - Who is this pr*ck? Tim Hasselbeck? His profile says he's a conservative activist.
Hey, that's out of line.
April 14, 2007 - 10:24 ET by BlondeHey, that's out of line.
Hi Blonde
April 14, 2007 - 10:29 ET by shawn228I could not agree more blonde, I am not Sport Politics biggest fan, but that was not very nice caringwhiteguy.
Good morning, Shawn,What I do
April 14, 2007 - 10:38 ET by BlondeGood morning, Shawn,
What I don't like is taking a sideswipe at someone.
If you have a beef or disagree, be direct about it.
Just look at how "nice&q
April 14, 2007 - 10:41 ET by CaringwhiteguyJust look at how "nice" Sports Politics has been to many other posters on this topic.
lol - Oh well
April 14, 2007 - 10:35 ET by SportPoliticslol - Oh well.
Thanks blonde.
I've figured it out already, no argument against shall issue.
Delivery complaints a plenty, but no substance.
I guess that ends just slamming Hasselbeck on this.
Eating the words is already going on, no doubt about it. Too bad I'm not more tactful.
Sporty,Well now you know why
April 14, 2007 - 10:40 ET by BlondeSporty,
Well now you know why the State Department sent you that reject letter. :D
Time to change subjects, for you, I suspect.
This dog is done hunting.
The View
April 13, 2007 - 16:27 ET by charlietexasLittle Beth is probably afraid of Rosie. Rosie might sit on her or something. I don't know who watches this show anyway. I work. I guess its just stupid liberals living off the government, sitting at home with nutin ta do.
I think EH is indeed a conser
April 13, 2007 - 16:31 ET by SmartypantsI think EH is indeed a conservative, but she's just not very politically astute, that's all. She has certain issues that are important to her but, let's face it, she is not an intellectual heavyweight who is going to out debate someone, even a liberal. That's exactly why The View wants her, and she's probably wise enough to know that. The leftists who run these shows have no interest in putting a strong conservative on there, to make their liberal hosts--like Joy and Rosie--look like the bumbling fools that they are. EH is probably well-paid to do what she does, and perhaps she does not want to jeopardize that position for the time being.
Smarty,Not to even think of t
April 13, 2007 - 16:39 ET by bigtimerSmarty,
Not to even think of trying to pick a fight here, but she admitted on H&C last night she wasn't..maybe there is a clip on Fox, I don't know, but it was pathetic...the whole thing was.
I don't know if you caught my above post...anyway, just wanted to say that.
Big,Actually, I did not see h
April 13, 2007 - 22:09 ET by SmartypantsBig,
Actually, I did not see her interview last night. I have heard her describe herself in the past as "more conservative" than those other ladies. In any case, she gave a key speech at the 2004 Republican National Convention and has never argued about being called "conservative" in the past. I tend to wonder if she is just playing to the crowd by stating that she is not conservative, or if this is yet another example of her lack of savvy. One begins to wonder if EH even knows the difference between liberal and conservative.
What a bunch of piling on.
April 14, 2007 - 07:56 ET by SportPoliticsWhat a bunch of piling on.
You're all full of it as well.
She did a fine job, except for throwing out her job on The View.
Does anyone really want to argue that Rosie doesn't get huge audience laughs, where as IMUS doesn't have that advantage ? (radio no in house audience of libs)
How could anyone - especially a very nice republican woman/conservative like Hasselbeck, not see IMUS as a crude mean old goat ?
When Rosie is doing her left wing gig, the audience erupts in laughter, and that's what Hasselbeck sees.
" Rosie wasn't being malicious".
I'm not sure I hold any of it against her, other than, she went easy to keep her job, or at least keep it pleasant.
I've never seen more BS piling on from this NB crew in my life.
Now we have a republican in with the 3 dogs of the left wing machine, being pleasant and getting shouted down, making her points when she can, and since she won't throw tubby over the side ( she cannot - obviously ) - everyone wants to cut her throat.
WHAT A BAD JOKE.
It isn't Hasselback that is acting like a fake conservative or a blowhard halfliberal, let me tell you.
Did you object to her free market comments ?
She did a fine job explaining her position, while Hannity and Colmes fought to KEEP THEIR JOBS safe from the attack machine.
Let's face it, she wouldn't have a problem, she doesn't talk *hit. She said fire her if she does.
Noone has a quote yet, do they ?
I guess Hasselbeck is quite a lot better than the angry conservatives here want to credit her for.
Sport,I don't want to cut her
April 14, 2007 - 11:38 ET by bigtimerSport,
I don't want to cut her throat, she does a pretty good job of it all by herself on national television with her wishy-washy diatribe, if you can call anything coming from her mouth as any bit intelligent...which you seem to do.
Btw...You sound like you have the hots for her about like poor Hannity.
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
As an aside, this is not the first time I have seen her on Hannity's shows before, she is always evasive...she is about as smart as an empty card-board box as far as I am concerned...I have stated quite a few times before if she is suppose to be the one person representing the right side, instead of the left, she needs to grow a spine...let alone a brain.
Yeah that was specific BT
April 14, 2007 - 12:15 ET by SportPoliticsYeah that was specific BT. More emtpy mindless complaints. Not a single point against her, except your empty rhetoric, and furthermore, you left out of the equation every point I have made for her.
I understand everyone here wants a Reagan or Bolton on The View, able to talk down and talk over all the rest of them, but when Hasselbeck gets her view out, none of you seem to have any argument with it.
If you do, none of you know what it is. I didn't really need you to tell me your empty opinion again BT, when between all my disdain for all of you here, I effectively defended WHAT SHE SAID on H&C,which none of you have had the balls, the spine, or the coherence to even comment upon, and pathetically it took shawn228 to acknowledge it.
She slapped down H&C right where they belong, and clearly knew their position, and hers, and even "disclaimer" SAID SO. ( this industry )
So, as far as the spot referrred to above, she was the conservative, and the rest were not.
Gosh, now I wish I could believe you, but NONE of you said she was too meek on the View.
You just all claimed "she isn't a conservative", and of course, YOU ARE ALL STILL WRONG.
Sorry about that, but that's the way the ball bounces.
Pincipled conservative with the far better argument - still not proven incorrect = Elisabeth Hasselbeck.
( But we don't want the free market anymore with these crazy liberals controlling it )
Oh, well, it was ok when it went the other way, wasn't it. Now,one conservative that stuck to principle, and she is the one attacked.
LOL - Yeah, you really, really convinced me BT. Your opinion, yeah, just like a liberal, you are welcome to it, even when you're wrong, and even when I continuously point out why, and all you can say is " it's my reality".
" I've seen her before today but I can't name a single thing either about her that is a non-conservative stance, but you really,really gotta believe me".
Now this is the part where you cuss me out and call me some names____________________________________.
You know Sporty you and I sta
April 14, 2007 - 12:46 ET by bigtimerYou know Sporty you and I stayed up all night into the wee hours of the morning awhile back, and as usual you were screaming at the top of your lungs at me and sarc...
Glad to see you are showing your true nutty colors for all to see in the daylight hours.
You have a real problem with comprehending anything I said..but then again in my opinion you usually do.
You have real problems friend, I would check into the nearest self-help center as soon as possible if I were you...but thankfully I am not!
Btw...I could care less one bit about the pretty face with the empty head, I do not care where she ends up, she is a simpleton that doesn't even know where she stands on anything...in other words...a spineless fence-sitter who thinks she is something at the moment, when she isn't..she will just be a memory in minds like yours who seem to not be able to listen to the words she says...and just drool.
Want to get really pissy? Ch
April 13, 2007 - 16:56 ET by mostlymoderateWant to get really pissy? Check out the Mediamatters site this morning. They intend to go after every conservative talk show host with a vengeance.
mm...See, I told ya so!LOL!Bt
April 13, 2007 - 17:03 ET by bigtimermm...
See, I told ya so!
LOL!
Btw...did you catch the post I replied to you somewhere else this morning? The discussion about all of this with gf and me on another thread...I had to check out, but did respond to something you said this morning, just wondered.
Catch ya later...
Hasselbeck
April 13, 2007 - 17:03 ET by iveseenitallI've never watched Rosie's Pig Pen myself, but I had my suspicions about Hasselbeck. They all were confirmed last night. Hasselbeck is on that show to sit and look pretty. She's worthless. And Hannity should be ashamed of himself. I thought any minute he and she would break into a rendition of "Patty-Cake, Patty-Cake, Baker's Man" ( complete with slapping of the hands). Scheeze!
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Hi isia...He was pathetic, my
April 13, 2007 - 17:15 ET by bigtimerHi isia...
He was pathetic, my husband and I were talking about this, he acts like a high school boy with the hots with her all the time, this isn't the first time I have seen him interview her, he embarrassed himself as far as I am concerned, for all to see. I told my husband if I was his wife, there would be some major trouble when you got home....then again he made a fool of himself nation wide, that in itself may be enough!
Btw...It was absolutely shameless all the way around, pretty bad when old turtle face Colmes looks almost better....I said almost.
LOL!
Hi
April 13, 2007 - 18:05 ET by iveseenitallHi, BT...Yes, there are a few libs a on t.v. who really turn you off when you see their mugs. Maher is another one. But that Colmes---oooh! My wife can't even watch him.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
desert tortoise
April 13, 2007 - 18:12 ET by bigtimerisia...
I can't help it, I was raised around desert turtles, and had a few as pets so to speak, anyway, Colmes from the neck up reminds me of one...exactly, especially from the side, when he gets older and his neck skin loosens some ect, he will be a perfect replica of a tortoise sticking his head out...
LOL!
yep
April 13, 2007 - 19:15 ET by iveseenitallRight on---LOL
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Maybe you can explain it iveseenitall
April 14, 2007 - 09:06 ET by SportPoliticsMaybe you can explain it iveseenitall. You watched Hasselbeck. Now what exactly did she get wrong ? What exactly wasn't conservative ? Got anything ? I really doubt it.
It's the View. It's not the A
April 13, 2007 - 17:37 ET by balboaIt's the View. It's not the Algonquin Round Table.
No boa it's the Leftist Spewi
April 13, 2007 - 17:53 ET by bigtimerNo boa it's the Leftist Spewing Round Table...with a swine leading the way.
... Point taken, it's enterta
April 13, 2007 - 17:53 ET by dahliatravers... Point taken, it's entertainment.
But, Balboa, are you saying hypocrisy is fine in certain venues?
That same old liberal song. &
April 13, 2007 - 17:56 ET by iveseenitallThat same old liberal song. "What are you getting so upset about?Lighten up." Try something else, Bal.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
isia...He can't help himself.
April 13, 2007 - 18:02 ET by bigtimerisia...
He can't help himself...he just has to do this, it's his nature!
Um, no, not what I'm saying.
April 13, 2007 - 19:50 ET by balboaUm, no, not what I'm saying. I'm saying you shouldn't be expecting so much from Hasselbeck because the show is The View, not a show that promises high-minded debate.
Oh okay boa...well guess you
April 13, 2007 - 19:57 ET by bigtimerOh okay boa...well guess you needed to 'splain that to us folks, sometimes we are so used to you seeming to take the leftist point of View...hehehee
Later...got to get some stuff done.
Nope. See other note on this
April 13, 2007 - 19:51 ET by balboaNope. See other note on this thread.
Well babelboa blew it again
April 14, 2007 - 04:14 ET by SportPoliticsWell babelboa blew it again. I think he hates Rosie because she's not an attractive woman on TV so he haphazardly had what appeared to be a moment of lucidity the other day. He can't rap with Noel about Rosie's latest hot movie. But now Lizzie, well, you hurt balby's feelers when you talk 'bout that.
I'veseenitall and ye Dahlia are correct, and balboa is fumbling in his blind self-ignorance again, defending his moron marble as he assaults with more stupidity.
This is the type of stupid that you see on movies where the Dad cuffs the back of the stupid sons melon and tells them to shut it. LOL
She's a hypocrit and stop as usual telling us to settle down.
gump : you're expecting too much(settle down) -she's just a View celeb(hypocrisy is ok) - No I'm just saying it's not "high minded debate" ( cut her a break hypocrisy is ok..) see above saith the babbler
The concept and action no liberal like bal could ever participate in, high minded debate, meaning IQ above room temperature I can see it now, the slow motion swing and the idiot noggin flicking forward unexpectedly. LOL I could lay a stinger on the back of that melon.
Oh, and NO, I didn't mean that, that's not what I'm saying, see just above.
Wow...even better blabbity go
April 14, 2007 - 18:16 ET by balboaWow...even better blabbity gobbledy-gook than usual.
did you understand any of that?
April 14, 2007 - 18:20 ET by RJdid you understand any of that? 'cause I didn't.
Yeah, that's kind of his M.O.
April 14, 2007 - 19:28 ET by balboaYeah, that's kind of his M.O.: crazy, rambling, lunacy.
If it were the algonquin
April 13, 2007 - 18:03 ET by misterbillIf it were the algonquin round table, Rosie would have been scalped a long time ago. OOOOH is that ethnic????
Indians
April 13, 2007 - 18:10 ET by iveseenitallSpeaking of indians ( er, Native Americans), I heared that they are living proof that you can't let immigration get out of hand. ( ba , da, boom).
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Isia--
April 13, 2007 - 18:16 ET by misterbillIsia-- I'm not going to Tumble to your trap!! Hee hee!
If they hadn't stopped tepee they would have won,biiiiiig drum rolllll.
Stop Rosie
April 13, 2007 - 23:52 ET by jb32765Found a petition for stop rosie on another forum
if you are interested go to
www.stoprosie.com
Hasselbeck
April 13, 2007 - 18:08 ET by CellaGood Grief! Hasselbeck - there is no "there" there.
She is breathtakingly dumb, and Sean Hannity was breathtakingly fawning.
After Elisabeth's performance that should end the conversation with her.
Great point Cella, you're a perfect sheeple
April 14, 2007 - 09:13 ET by SportPoliticsGreat point Cella, you're a perfect sheeple,you fit right in with the non points and blabber from everyone else.
Hasselbeck outdid you all, smoked every last one of you.
Hannity didn't win his whine either. On the one hand, he was offended by Rosie, like a liberal. On the other hand, he angry the free market worked and canned IMUS, after the 15 billion went bye bye- as HASSELBECK pointed out.
On the third hand, it was OK when it wasthe dixie chicks, as a BAND - didn't seem too close to a radio commentator.
LOL
Wow, the blind conservative morons destroyed by the pretty blonde.
Oh well, good looks aren't everything.
Sport Politics
April 14, 2007 - 09:29 ET by shawn228Elizabeth Hasselbeck defends her points quite well. I never thought I would type these words but "I agree with SportPolitics on this one"
That's right shawn228
April 14, 2007 - 09:37 ET by SportPoliticsThat's right shawn228, the truth and an insult. Good job. That will surely happen to you much more often, if you want to be correct.
Must have taken some guts, since I have the every side of the whole argument, and the emotionally charged cut Hasselbeck's throat crew never thought past their own hatred of Rosie or the "dumb blonde" stereotype.
I guess it was they who, instead of paying attention and thinking, let their peckers do the talking, or their she's cuter than me jealousy rule the day.
Sport Politics......
April 14, 2007 - 10:22 ET by shawn228Not trying insult you Sport Politics. It is nice to see that dumb liberals like me are not the only ones you insult and call idiot. You are equally an A***ole to everybody, I mean that in a good way.
"I mean that in a good way"
April 14, 2007 - 10:31 ET by RJ"I mean that in a good way"
That's your idea of a compliment? Is that a liberal thing? ;^>
RJ
April 14, 2007 - 10:37 ET by shawn228I mean that it is refreshing seeing Sport Politics handing you your *ss on a platter. I am usually on the receiving end of his rants and now he is dishing it out to you.
"handing you your a** on
April 14, 2007 - 10:44 ET by RJ"handing you your a** on a platter"
Is that some kind of liberal logic? All I see is me laughing at his inanities. Being a liberal, though, I don't suppose you easily grasp the concept.
What I do see is the little guy on the playground (you) sucking up to the guy who has been dumping on him. Hoping to get better treatment in the future, shawn? ;^>
And all I see is you still being wrong
April 14, 2007 - 10:47 ET by SportPoliticsAnd all I see is you still being wrong, a good little troll.
"Troll?" Once aga
April 14, 2007 - 10:50 ET by RJ"Troll?" Once again, I'm wounded by your rapier-like reparte, Sport/Tumbler.
Well RJ, being a man about it won't be happening will it.
April 14, 2007 - 12:26 ET by SportPoliticsWell RJ, being a man about it won't be happening will it, for you.
You've got nothing but trolling crap, and won't address the points, and are down to, "well it was my opinion", but now it's unbackable, because you may change it in the future, but obviously already did because I made the points that REQUIRED you to,but you aren't man enough to admit it.
What point pinhead lying troll RJ no doubt was thinking, or was very willing to pretend he was thinking in his next post:
Hasselbeck defended the free market, while Hannity and Colmes did not.
Whatever, troll.
RJ,Shawn and SP agreeing is a
April 14, 2007 - 12:37 ET by bigtimerRJ,
Shawn and SP agreeing is a good laugh!
Glad to see Shawn is showing his true colors again...didn't take long.
No, it didn't BT. Comic rel
April 14, 2007 - 12:46 ET by RJNo, it didn't BT. Comic relief is always fun.
bigtimer
April 14, 2007 - 12:53 ET by shawn228Bigtimer, I don't have a beef with you. I respond to RJ in the same manner he treats me. Blonde told me you and MM are very fun if you are not provoked. So I will not engage with you.
PS
I did not know you were a woman until a last night. If I did know I would not have been so crude
You and I went round and roun
April 14, 2007 - 13:03 ET by bigtimerYou and I went round and round the other night, along with blonde, so don't play innocent with me..it won't work..save it for somebody who cares.
Now the troll admits his trolling ? LOL RJ the troll
April 14, 2007 - 13:13 ET by SportPoliticsNow the troll admits his trolling ? LOL RJ the troll.
So, now after you changed your nearly ignorant mind from it's all too obvious just what everyone should have expected, to I only saw her once, to I'm willing to change my mind, and then on to I'm not a troll, you happily admit you are one. Glad you are a zero.
If you come up with that answer shawn pointed out that you claimed you hadn't dodged because the "question didn't exist", let all us "conservative lights" know.
BTW- When you come out as the all knowing bear from your hibernation against Hasselbeck and mindlessly proclaim " noone should be surprised " - I won't be trolling, I'll be slapping you down with the facts, as I have.
There are plenty more where those came from. Shall we try abortion for starters ?
Do you have even the slightes
April 14, 2007 - 13:38 ET by RJDo you have even the slightest spark of intelligent thought? Oh, nevermind...that's rhetorical.
I haven't changed my mind or my story, Sport/Tumbler, but it doesn't matter. You just mindlessly prattle on and on with whatever passes for thought in that space between your ears. My gosh, you act more like Tumbler with every post.
Oops. Bear out of hibernation? Tired of your moronic and trite name calling, so you copy my flames? lol. ;^>
Answer the question RJ
April 14, 2007 - 13:42 ET by shawn228What conservative points did Hasselbeck not defend? I know it makes you feel better about yourself to whine, but please just answer the question will ya? Actually you know what? I'm bored of you. I will find someone that can hold a conversation.
Guess that makes you a liar, shawn
April 14, 2007 - 14:03 ET by RJMaking stuff up, shawn? tsk tsk. Guess that makes you a liar. Once again, where did I say that?
Here is your first story RJ
April 14, 2007 - 13:50 ET by SportPoliticsHere is it, own it.
[No offense, folks, but I don't understand why this comes as a surprise to anyone.] There's the master opinion
[ I watched exactly one "View" program a month or so ago and at first thought the reason Hasselbeck couldn't defend the conservative position was that she just lacked the brainpower.] There's the dumb blonde remark, with one show under his belt,and the screaming shoutdown triple threat against her. Not sure anyone can do it in that case,but hey what the hell do you care ?
[Then I pretty quickly realized that she's no conservative...she just plays one on TV] And the last idiot remark, and so far,not one shread of proof to the contrary.
She agreed with Hannity on Sharpton and Jackson as I pointed out already. She is smart enough to have taken an angle that has kept her job, and as you well know, the FREE MARKET has agreed with her stance, that Rosie has not been as malicious.
So, what exactly is "just plays a conservative ", you moron ?
Her opinion, that you cannot disprove, and won't even bag the quote that Hannnity couldn't challenge by providing it ?
Looks to me she left you whining with your hands empty. She outsmarted you, dummy.
Sigh. And how does this sho
April 14, 2007 - 13:57 ET by RJSigh. And how does this show that I've changed my opinion? Hello? Anyone home? ....nevermind....rhetorical question.
Yes more to the whining point RJ
April 14, 2007 - 14:04 ET by SportPoliticsYes more to the whining point RJ, we're back to, you'll keep an open mind for the future.
Now, is that different than your master stoke first post where noone should be surprised, and " I realized she just plays one on TV" ?
YES, IT IS. BUSTED.
Of course, the free market she defended, is something you have avoided, claiming you didn't change your opinion, but of course I pointed out her conservative CREDS, which you have not disputed once on that note.
This clearly shows, your newly found "open mind willing to change" was influenced when I didn't blindly babble on like the rest of you.
So, mr why is anyone surprised, there's the EXPLANATION for you, since you play "too stupid" to figure it out for yourself. Hey, balboa will be your friend the rest of the day, and you can take " I play stupid too" tips and trade them.
Sigh. And how does this sho
April 14, 2007 - 14:25 ET by RJSigh. And how does this show that I've changed my opinion? because you say it does? lol! ;^>
And, PLEASE, Sports/Tumbler, try to keep your stream-of-consciousness rambling to a mininum. I have hard enought a time decoding your deranged thought process when you use complete sentences.
RJ..Just a thought here...bel
April 14, 2007 - 14:05 ET by bigtimerRJ..
Just a thought here...believe me he won't quit, I know I ended up staying up until 5 am one morning going back and forth with him, it is and was irrational, and I got drawn into it all over him screaming at sarc the likes I have never seen...and sarc and I are different as night and day on most issues, but he is a friend, it was uncalled for and he has been here forever too.
(You weren't back yet, anyway on the board...that is.)
It is useless, but I am no better or I would of turned in at least three hours earlier that night!
LMAO!
Yes bigtimer, but of course, that's true when you're
April 14, 2007 - 14:13 ET by SportPoliticsYes bigtimer, but of course, that's true when you're incapable of doing anything but claiming it's "your opinion of her".
Do any of you "good two shoes" winners have any stance she has taken publicly on the The View that proves she isn't a real conservative ?
You had how long to provide one ? LOL
But, I'm the one who won't stop.
I'm the bad guy, and you won't be any better for it ?
I'll have my stance confirmed soon enough, voiced or not, by the stick together crew.
She is making more appearances, one scheduled for Fox, right ?
We have that whole archive where although some now gone 2005 and prior, the rest says it all about her,huh.
Wanna pull that non-conservative stance out for us ?
Listen Sport..If you bothered
April 14, 2007 - 14:26 ET by bigtimerListen Sport..
If you bothered to read my first couple of posts on this whole thing...I said I watched/listened to the whole segment...she could and would not say what in the hell she was....a conservative, a leftist, a libetarian, a moderate...zilch!
In my opinion that is exactly what she is.... ZILCH! EMPTY! ZERO! NADA! DUMB AS A BOX OF ROCKS BLEACHED BLONDE!
Got it!
Get a clue.
Hasselbeck EXCELLENT argument - here is the text
April 14, 2007 - 15:07 ET by SportPoliticsHasselbeck EXCELLENT argument - here is the text
You are WRONG, and very few of you argue as well as she does.
COLMES: Why is it a good day?
HASSELBECK: I think that the marketplace has spoken.
COLMES: The marketplace hasn't spoken.
HASSELBECK: I think the listeners have spoken.
SEAN HANNITY, CO-HOST: He's my Rosie, by the way.
HASSELBECK: I feel your pain.
COLMES: I look nothing like her. Look, the marketplace has not decided. If the
marketplace would decide, they would put him on the air, see if people continued
to tune in. This is not an issue of...
(CROSSTALK)
HASSELBECK: What is this, "American Idol," where people vote in?
COLMES: Yes, well, actually, it is. The marketplace should decide. And why was
he fired, for what?
HASSELBECK: What role do sponsors play in this? They pulled out. You saw Staples
pull out, Procter & Gamble pulled out.
COLMES: Do you believe in forgiveness?
HASSELBECK: Is Imus now the victim now? I don't care. I'm not worried about him.
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: I think, actually, to some extent, I think he is a victim. And I think
he's a victim of this overreaction and a slippery slope and this piling on.
HASSELBECK: He shot himself in the foot.
HASSELBECK: It's not a three-second comment, though, because, unfortunately,
we're in a world now where he has many audiences. He has his immediate audience
that heard it right away. He has people who hear it on blogs, on YouTube, on
shows like this.
(CROSSTALK)
HASSELBECK: ... far beyond three seconds.
ASSELBECK: But apologies and regret and remorse do not give you absolution from
consequence. We're in a society now, we're afraid to give consequence. And this
is — did he lose his freedom of speech? He can go on saying all those things all
he wants. People are just going to pay for it.
By that standard,
should she have been fired?
HASSELBECK: It's certainly not position to say if Rosie (INAUDIBLE) it's my job
to show up every day. And I love the responsibility.And I take full pleasure in
countering everything she has to say.
HASSELBECK: I understand your concern. I mean, we're in the same industry. I
believe that, you know, we're all out there saying things that we believe.
But I do believe in consequence, and I believe the people have spoken. And I
think that has to be respected, as well.
Hannity> ...hearing about the Holocaust, Hymietown.
HASSELBECK: Yes, Hymietown.
HASSELBECK: You know, they seem to like to take the lead on issues. And I was
growing up — I grew up believing people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
They have loud voices in our society right now.
HASSELBECK: I don't know where — I don't know where we draw the line anymore. I
think it's difficult. If it's your group, is it OK for you to use the word? In
my opinion, no.
______________________________________
NOTHING like a faux conservative. EXCELLENT arguments. CLEAR concise and CORRECT.
Sport listen to the link I sent, then get back to me big boy
April 14, 2007 - 15:35 ET by bigtimerSport...
Go here, listen to the whole show, reply to me when you are done listening.
I commented in my post that I heard and listened to the whole segment...and she hemmed and hawed around an answer about what she was politically...
See if you can follow the bouncing ball...I will be waiting...http://www.foxnews.com/hannityandcolmes/index.html
She's a CONSERVATIVE BT
April 14, 2007 - 15:48 ET by SportPoliticsShe's a CONSERVATIVE BT, she said so, and she KA'ed as a conservative, knocked it out of the ball park.
YOU accused her of NOT being one.
So did all your little stragglers.
But, you are ALL WRONG.
Now, after I bring you the link, you whine I should read and watch it. LOL
You people SUCK.
[ By the way, you say
you're evolving, toward liberalism? You're growing, you're evolving, you're
moving toward the light?
HASSELBECK: Did I suggest that? Oh, Alan. Oh, Alan.
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: ... coming, you know, proper direction here.
HASSELBECK: No.
COLMES: Have you always been a conservative?
HASSELBECK: You know, I've always been — you know, I consider myself a
contemplative conservative. And my parents were independent. I never knew who
they voted for. They really birthed in us a spirit of freedom of thought and
just evaluating individuals. And that's what I think people really need to do in
this election, maybe not so much look at the party color or animal.
COLMES: I think we too often do judge people. Are you liberal or conservative?
And then we judge people based on what their political philosophy is and not
judge them as human beings.
HASSELBECK: I don't define myself as conservative personally. I seriously don't.
I would hope that people wouldn't do that to any of us here at the panel. You
know...
COLMES: So does it bother you when they say, oh, the conservative on "The View"?
Does that bother you?
HASSELBECK: Well, they can say what they want. I really am more concerned about
how I define myself.]
Comtemplative conservative, or a THINKING PERSON.
Let's do an outline of her positions on the little H&C
1 .pro Iraq war
2 . Pro Iraq war with battles duh lib alan- no pull out - the most dangerous thing
3. consequences for speaking in public and saying things. No more society that is afraid to give consequences.
4. Sharpton and Jackson are the same, they seem to advocate in issues - not sure where we draw the line because of this
5. The marketplace decided, alan is an idiot
6. Pelosi is a dip for going to Syria - she might pull another stunt and go to Iran
7. It sucks with Rosie on the show - she feels Sean's pain
8. Her "favorite" day was Rosie's audition. Dripping with sarcasm
9. The next election is dangerous because idiots side with the enemy instead of the USA, it's worrysome
10. pointing at the libs make sense because of lot of their crap came out after the surge was announced...
[ COLMES: So we shouldn't be pointing at the other side, "They're like Al Qaeda"?
"Those people over there, those lefties, those lunatics"?
HASSELBECK: Well, a lot of it has come out since, you know, we're talking about
the surge now and...]
You are nuts for sure sports.
April 14, 2007 - 15:56 ET by bigtimerYou are nuts for sure sports...
She said I don't consider myself a conservative....what part of that do you not understand...and who in the hell has ever heard of a contemplative conservative...huh?! What the hell is that?
I am done with you...an apology would be nice but you get proven wrong and you insist you are still right...typical leftist spin.
Like I said she is a spineless bimbo-head...and so are you.
I have watched her on all Hannity's shows and she is empty.
Adios Troll.
Wrong again BT
April 14, 2007 - 16:07 ET by SportPolitics[ COLMES: Absolutely, she should have chit-chats, because we should be talking to
other countries, just like the Baker commission suggested. By the way, you say
you're evolving, toward liberalism? You're growing, you're evolving, you're
moving toward the light?
HASSELBECK: Did I suggest that? Oh, Alan. Oh, Alan.
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: ... coming, you know, proper direction here.
HASSELBECK: No.
COLMES: Have you always been a conservative?
HASSELBECK: You know, I've always been — you know, I consider myself a
contemplative conservative. ]
And I outlined TEN hardcore conservative arguments she waged.
Comtemplative means THINKING - bt, since you're too stupid to admit it.
Want those TEN conservative points,including FULL SUPPORT for the war in Iraq ?
The RIP against Pelosi ?
You want some ?
LOL
When the little hottie that has youso jealous argued about not just considering herself a conservative, she was arguing she shouldn't be just labelled but people should think about what is being said. AND she only said that AFTER she established she is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN a contemplative conservative.
Probably much better than embracing compassionate conservative, since you've all ripped her to shreds and lied about her, being the idiots that you are.
NO APOLOGY WILL ISSUE from me.
AIN'T NO WAY.
Come on bugger, bring me that non-conservative talking point of hers before I go pull your damned text.
Sports honey darlin'..this th
April 14, 2007 - 16:16 ET by bigtimerSports honey darlin'..this thread is gettin' thin, about like your pathetic points.
Btw little one, I have never had to worry in my life about being jealous of anyone, let alone have the time or thought to.
Move on to others Sport...I am done with you.
lol, BT. Sports/Tumbler cal
April 14, 2007 - 16:28 ET by RJlol, BT. Sports/Tumbler called her "that little hottie".....and there we have it. Like I said at the very beginning, Sports/Tumbler is thinking with his libido....as if it weren't already obvious to everyone....'splains why he's all wrought up... ;^>
Yeah RJ,He can drool on...lik
April 14, 2007 - 16:32 ET by bigtimerYeah RJ,
He can drool on...like she is gonna give him a second look, he screams too much for her little sensitive ears and feeble little delicate mind!
Yes,of course you're still reading silent boy RJ
April 14, 2007 - 16:55 ET by SportPoliticsYes,of course you're still reading silent boy RJ.
So, BT's comment about "just eye candy" in her first post that I referenced, is ME commenting on her looks. LOL
YOU SIR, ARE A MORON. BT MADE THE STATEMENT IN HER FIRST ANGRY COMMENT.
BTW- Is Hasselbeck bad for helping scoop out 15million bucks from part of the LEFT wing media bias machine ?
LOLOLOLOLOL
Wow. Another a** kicking dual set of points against you complaining sissy fools.
Keep amusing yourself, you do need help.
Might want to let BT know that the prettiest cats always have the sharpest claws for one another. Of course, you'd have known that, if you had a clue about anything in this thread, or maybe me telling BT that she made a fool of herself claiming she doesn't have to worry, LOL, means she is on the LOSING side again,and it's getting way too easy.
Is Lizzie bad for helping slam down a liberal media bias machine ? TAKEDOWN.
Gosh if we had another couple dozen of her, we could close up shop here at NB.
LOL - Yes, she's bad, bad non-conservative.
Maybe MRC should hire her. LOL
No you aren't done BT
April 14, 2007 - 16:42 ET by SportPoliticsNo you aren't done BT, you were and are wrong, and eventually it's going to be stark raving madly clear to you.
Your little cook job while the TV was on had you catching much less than you should have, and the text is BLISTERINGLY conservative on every point she makes.
You know full well her SECONDARY argument against being labelled is a defense against attacks from the left, and nothing more.
If you are a conservative and are too damned stupid to see it, you better take your own evaluation of Hasselbeck and slap it right on your own forehead,right next to the word stupid.
You people went bonkers against her because she hasn't crushed Rosie to your satisfacton. Well guess what , NEITHER has the conservative public.
Rosie is seated and IMUS is not, and the attack machine of the republicans is not honed like the left's is.
You should BE PROUD that a true conservative like Hasselbeck stood for the takedown of IMUS, and shed a little light on a conservative that ISN'T A RACIST.
Of course all of you, just had to rip into her, now which of her ten interview talking points makes her a spineless non-conservative ?
You think you'd do any better with fatso and behar and a third , and the entire audeince and atmosphere aligned against you ? I definitely seriously doubt it.
She did quite well on H&C, need I point out how she shredded Alan - again ? Pelosi. The lib anti american anti war pullout people, the most dangerous idea....hand it over to Iran ...acknowledged the double standard with jackson and sharpton,then countered, why not IMUS now, why not long ago,since he has had an established pattern for a long time ( being a WISE conservative, and taking what can be gotten -ripping down on the left wing media institution - TAKING part of ABC DOWN)
Yeah, time to brush up, and stop stomping on conservatives fighting for our side, quite unfairly.
Okay Sweetheart, my precious
April 14, 2007 - 16:53 ET by bigtimerOkay Sweetheart, my precious little honey....
You are right for once today...I'm not done..
Stick a fork in it....you are!
lol BT
April 14, 2007 - 17:09 ET by SportPoliticslol BT, now was funny.
But I'm not about to do anything but let RJ salivate over his newfound TV CINO, or rainlillie who appears to be his current preference.
I'm still for the war, and for taking down the liberal media machine, you know, just like EH, eh ?
Like I said, more spine than you whiners
April 14, 2007 - 16:23 ET by SportPoliticsLike I said, more spine than you whiners:
" I have always considered myself a comtemplative conservative "
1. 100% pro Iraq war
2. 100 % against Pelosi
3. NO, not moving left as Allen suggested
4. BAD Rosie audition day, she feels the pain(of Allen too)
5. NO PULLING OUT
6. Al Sharpton and Jesse are scammers, where it stands she doesn't know, but she KNOWS she helped get RID OF IMUS. More spine than Hannity.
7. THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES- WE LIVE IN A TIMES WHERE PEOPLE ARE AFRAID TO GIVE CONSEQUENCES,BUT THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES.
lololollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllloooooooooollllllllllllllll
SUPER CONSERVATIVE !!! AAAAAAAAAA++++++++++
Now, what bigtimer used to believe:
[ she also would not say she was really a conservative, or a libertarian, or anything...she hemmed and hawed...I was cooking while she was talking, but I think I pretty much got that right, others may correct me here...she is nothing but a pretty face to fill in and pretend to be something she's not...and she doesn't even do that well.
I have never watched The View, nor will I, why should I have to anyway, we get all the clips we need here, and I do see them on other political shows.
When I think of her...or see her name..I think...SPINELESS! ]
LOLOL - Yes, slammed Alan, slammed the traitor libs on the Iraq war and the surge and the pullout - slammed Pelosi - got in 2 STEALTH WHACKS on Rosie...
Yeah, that's one conservative you need to dis down and destroy.
Heck she's not needed, borderline . LOLOLOL
You people are just brilliant, boy I bet you would run circles around her.
LOLOLOLOL
Get ph#cked Sporty.
April 14, 2007 - 15:27 ET by bigtimerGet ph#cked Sporty.
Yeah, like I said BT, now the PROOF is here
April 14, 2007 - 15:52 ET by SportPoliticsYeah, like I said BT, now the PROOF is here.
Now's when you use your little SWEAR.
I guess I misunderestimated the time for you to call me names.
Now you're SCREWED.
And NOW, you can all say:
"I'll be damned HE IS RIGHT AND WE ARE WRONG,WRONG WRONG. "
[ COLMES: Absolutely, she should have chit-chats, because we should be talking to
other countries, just like the Baker commission suggested. By the way, you say
you're evolving, toward liberalism? You're growing, you're evolving, you're
moving toward the light?
HASSELBECK: Did I suggest that? Oh, Alan. Oh, Alan.
(CROSSTALK)
COLMES: ... coming, you know, proper direction here.
HASSELBECK: No.COLMES: Have you always been a conservative?
HASSELBECK: You know, I've always been — you know, I consider myself a
contemplative conservative.
____________________________
Get ph#cked, indeed.
BT
April 14, 2007 - 12:55 ET by SportPoliticsshawn can't explain why he agrees anymore than you fools can explain why you slammed the conservative Hasselbeck.
So, in that strange convergence you noticed, I noticed my little latchkey friend is just as blank as the rest of you.
You'd do better to argue with him, wouldn't you.
Now that's comic relief.
What isn't so comical is the complete breakdown of you claimed conservatives here, with your shameful little crap tactics, worthy of liberals.
Not one of you with the salt to admit it.
Sport...Take a nappy.Wake up
April 14, 2007 - 13:05 ET by bigtimerSport...
Take a nappy.
Wake up with that frown turned upside down.
LOL!
Hey it's a gas BT
April 14, 2007 - 13:22 ET by SportPoliticsHey it's a gas BT. You're all asleep at the wheel and I'm the one driving awake. I think I'll stay awake. Now you wake up, and clear that dream out of your head.
You know when all this broke, I surely thought it would wake the liberals up screaming, and perhaps it has to a degree, I have seen some commenting that this IMUS firing has gone too far, but I never thought it would put the conservatives to sleep.
Hey, take a nippy nap and dream about the dixie chicks, and take that I hate Hasselbeck frown off your kisser. :-)
You are either really bonkers
April 14, 2007 - 13:33 ET by bigtimerYou are either really bonkers SP or a loud mouthed troll.
Either way...take your meds.
BT -- he's Jumped the Psych
April 14, 2007 - 13:37 ET by Jack BauerBT -- he's Jumped the Psyche Ward!
Yeah Jack Bauer
April 14, 2007 - 13:39 ET by SportPoliticsExactly, only you were the honest one, stating clearly your complaint, what you want Hasselbeck to ask the pig Rosie.
In fact, you are the only one, or nearly the only one, who didn't whine and call her a non conservative.
Congratulations.
Hey Jack...afternoon or bette
April 14, 2007 - 13:44 ET by bigtimerHey Jack...afternoon or better yet evening to you!
You got me laughing out loud as usual with that line...by the way, I love your neo tag-line!
Psyche Ward is right, Jack.
April 14, 2007 - 14:34 ET by RJPsyche Ward is right, Jack. And you're right, too, BT. He is deranged, just like his mind-meld buddy. It's like I'm working with a couple of psychos on the lock-down unit of a Psychiatric Hospital. Time for my shift to end? ;^>
Sport/Tumbler as "your average bear"
April 14, 2007 - 13:24 ET by RJNot surprisingly, Sport/Tumbler, you show again that you don't have the capability of following logical thought. From the very beginning, it's clearly been my opinion. I added that the post at the top shows her double standard.
But hey, you came roaring out like a scruffy, enraged bear, waking up from winter hibernation. I don't expect to get any more clear thought from you than I would your average bear. ;^>
And now the real Schmeagle in full backtrack
April 14, 2007 - 13:33 ET by SportPoliticsAnd now the real schmeagle in full backtrack, with his " it's my opinion" ( and I'm sticking to it - just to save face - because I can't say anything else) while I whine you're mean.
"Well, I can't imagine anyone here is surpised, said bmoc conservative masterman, this is my opinion, of course."
bubba-bubba...bubba, buh buh, buh buh braindead.
Show me where I've changed an
April 14, 2007 - 13:41 ET by RJShow me where I've changed anything I've said, Sport/Tumbler. Since you can't, that makes you a liar.....or deranged, like your mind-meld buddy, Tumbler.
Showing again
April 14, 2007 - 14:21 ET by SportPoliticsHere is it, own it.
[No offense, folks, but I don't understand why this comes as a surprise to anyone.] There's the master opinion
[ I watched exactly one "View" program a month or so ago and at first thought the reason Hasselbeck couldn't defend the conservative position was that she just lacked the brainpower.] There's the dumb blonde remark, with one show under his belt,and the screaming shoutdown triple threat against her. Not sure anyone can do it in that case,but hey what the heck do you care ?
[Then I pretty quickly realized that she's no conservative...she just plays one on TV]
So now you have "an open mind" for the future.
Congratulations.
She agreed with Hannity on Sharpton and Jackson as I pointed out already. She is smart enough to have taken an angle that has kept her job, and as you well know, the FREE MARKET has agreed with her stance, that Rosie has not been as malicious.
So, what exactly is "just plays a conservative" ?
Ahh, keep watching, she'll be on more, and the 2006+ archive here at NB is filled with her conservative stances.
Nice cut and paste skills, S
April 14, 2007 - 14:50 ET by RJNice cut and paste skills, Sports/Tumbler. You'll be ready for first grade soon. But please tell me how this shows that I've changed my opinion....thanks in advance, little guy. ;^>
Not at all RJ
April 14, 2007 - 10:56 ET by shawn228I happen to agree with Sport Politics on this subject. I am not sucking up to anybody. As I have told you before, I do not agree with Liberals about everything. If I disagreed with Sport Politics on this subject I would say so. The only concept I grasp is that he is destroying you in this debate he keeps asking you direct questions that you are ducking. I suspect the reason why you are bringing up the playground simile is maybe you were that kid on playground? Were you pushed around as a child and the other kids took your lunch money? Poor RJ. Your so poor you can't pay attention. Gotta log out for while. sniff sniff. Whats that I smell? Oh thats SP giving you a A**kicking
Poor shawn. Always hampered
April 14, 2007 - 11:06 ET by RJPoor shawn. Always hampered by his special limitatons in logical thought. If you ever rejoin the thread, shawn please show me where I've ducked. I clearly said I only watched her on one occasion and that I formed an opinion...which I stated.
As for the rest of your post, you should be old enough to think up your own flames, rather than the old reliable and childish schoolyard taunt, "you are too!" Is that the best you can do, shawn?.....oh, never mind....that's clearly rhetorical.
I'm back RJ
April 14, 2007 - 12:23 ET by shawn228Not a schoolhouse taunt. I really feel you are the type of person that is trying to make up for his shortcomings by being all macho on the net. Your the one that people talk about at the water cooler when your back is turned. That is because if they voiced their concerns to you, you would shrug it off and for once in your life be a liberal and complain to human resources. If I am wrong so be it. I just have you pegged for "that guy"
the 97 pound weakling of the board
April 14, 2007 - 12:39 ET by RJThat you consider friendly 'ol me to be "all macho" tells more about you than me, shawn. Although, when you're a 97 pound weakling, I suppose everyone else on the board looks "macho" to you.
And, shawn, it's clearly a projection of your own insecurities when you bring up "your (sic) the one who people talk about at the water cooler when your back is turned." You must have a helluva time at work, guy....every whisper, every conversation is laughing at YOU.... ;^>
P.S. Still waiting for you to point out specifically where I've "ducked."
lol RJ
April 14, 2007 - 12:50 ET by shawn228Okay you tried to flame me about the "you are too" defense and here you are using the same logic. sigh........ In your own words "back under the bridge troll"
PS
SP asked you what points Hasselbeck did not defend?
Sorry, my little 97 pound wea
April 14, 2007 - 13:51 ET by RJSorry, my little 97 pound weakling, "back under the bridge" must belong to another poster.
As for your question...see, this is another example of how your and your hero, Sport/Tumbler, are all confused in your poor overwrought heads. Somehow, I've become your Hasselbeck Boogyman who has personally said everything negative about her on the thread. I have not said that Hasselbeck did not defend points.
You might want to stop looking like a fool and address what I've actually said....oh, nevermind.....that's an impossible task to give you.
Not to waste me time....but
April 14, 2007 - 14:01 ET by shawn228Still bored of you RJ. Hope you don't sue me recalling your fine literature, but this is a direct quote from you is it not?
No offense, folks, but I don't understand why
this comes as a surprise to anyone. I watched exactly one "View"
program a month or so ago and at first thought the reason Hasselbeck
couldn't defend the conservative position was that she just lacked the
brainpower. Then I pretty quickly realized that she's no
conservative...she just plays one on TV.
The
boob tube is full of people who "plays a conservative on TV", whether
it's on news programs, talk shows, sitcoms or dramas.
Yes, little shawnie, that was my OPINION,
April 14, 2007 - 14:18 ET by RJYes, little shawnie, that was my OPINION, and I also told your hero, Sport/Tumbler, that it wasn't (and still isn't) a big enough issue in my life to record. Naturally, if I knew I was going to become the Evil Hhasselback Boogyman, for a couple of silly fools, I would have done so. ;^>
Happy to oblige shawn228
April 14, 2007 - 10:44 ET by SportPoliticsHappy to oblige shawn228, we have that whole compassionate conservatrive crew being a**holes to Hasselbeck, and they aren't even correct in the spew they vent.
Glad I'm in with the crowd, at least with the being an a**hole part.
Elizabeth is trying out for
April 13, 2007 - 20:38 ET by FairlightElizabeth is trying out for a Fox role. If Rosie stays at the View, Liz is leaving. Especially when Fox will pay her 5 times more and remove the bullies.
liz is hawt
April 14, 2007 - 03:09 ET by wiwfliz is hawt
Hasselbeck's comments
April 14, 2007 - 06:40 ET by goldenthroatWhy is Elisabeth even on "The View"? Is she supposed to be the token "conservative"? If she is, she is failing miserably in that role. I watched the video clip on www.foxnews.com of Hannity and Colmes interview with her and she is an embarrasment to the conservative cause! I don't feel Sean wimped out so much as I think he was stunned as to how she was coming across - and yes, I, too, found myself siding with Colmes - scary, isn't it?
Yeah it's scarey goldenthroat
April 14, 2007 - 09:18 ET by SportPoliticsYeah it's scarey goldenthroat, when you agree with radio jobs on the line H&C both, against the "free market forces" of ad dollars and the corporate CEO's and can't figure out H&C have an agenda,it IS scarey.
Besides the blank never a statement or a quote you have a problem with - well the hell with besides that - What did get you all in a tither about Hasselbeck, besides the dumb blonde insult with absolutely ZERO to back it up ?
Hasselbeck
April 15, 2007 - 07:08 ET by goldenthroatHUH?
Here's a few fair questions
April 14, 2007 - 08:08 ET by Jack BauerHere's a few fair questions Hasselbeck might consider asking the exceptionally malicious O'Donnell on air.
What, in short, is the miserable black hole of self-loathing insanity and drivel that drives a malignant narcissist like Rosie O’Donnell, and the millions of acolytes like her?
The "The Gulf between O'Donnell's Ears" Google it everyone!Hannity usually reads the comment made
April 14, 2007 - 08:29 ET by SportPoliticsHannity usually reads the comment made, but of course he didn't in this case.
Is Hasselbeck a lot more correct than the throw a republican over the side of boat raging bloodlust crew in this thread wants to give credit for ?
I loved this one " I have never watched The View" - yet boy that condemnationon Hasselbeck really came down.
So, she discussed the free market, and the people speaking through it, and how she isn't a racist and could personally be fired and please do if she said anything like IMUS did, ever, yet boy she's bad news, right ?
She wouldn't cut Rosie throat and her own job.
Yeah, well, I'm sure I quite understand how Trent Lott got canned now.
You all act like moronic liberals when you don't get your way on one thing. Some of you even trashed Hannity - claiming he didn't hold her feet to the fire, which he did.
But not a one of you held H&C's feet to the fire, when THEIR AGENDA combined and in perfect agreement with eachother - was "we gottakeep OUR jobs" in the future.
Well, I guess Elisabeth WINS in that future scenario, huh.
The one republican who doesn't have a filthy disgusting attack mouth. Gosh,that must be terrible for you people.
Anyone want a piece of me on this ?
As Bush said, BRING IT ON.
SportP
April 14, 2007 - 08:41 ET by gfrrmanHaving seen parts of "The View" on occasion I can say without a doubt that Hasselback is an intellectual lightweight when it comes to presenting any particular side of an argument. She seems to be more of a moderate..which to me means she hasn't a clue about where she stands on anything until the subject is brought up. If she is supposedly smart, she sure keeps it all bottled up, cause I've never seen that side. Actually I think she's a f'ing stupid airhead. Btw, I also am in the minority when it comes to commenting on her looks....sorry she's just nasty!!! There, how's that?
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Another empty opinion gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 08:58 ET by SportPoliticsAnother empty opinion gfrrman.
She takes on 3 idiot liberals and they shut her down and shut her up - but when she does get two words in, it's the republican conservative truth.
She also destroyed Hannity.
The hypocrits this time are the republicans who loved the dixie chicks canning and caning, but now are worried about their own. You want Hasselbeck to get the lib side fired ? HA
Hey, dial the republican ad dollars, and away they go, as Hasselbeck pointed out.
GEE, that's what happened during the dixie chicks.
Get off the chicken pot dummy.
I'm sure all of you would rip Rosie to shreads, be up on the glass desktop , and slug her to a bloody mess before day 1 was over, but then there's a reason why Hasselbeck has survived.
You're all mad she "defended Rosie" - but of course, she defended herself.
Any one of you want to get Rosie comments since Hannity couldn't read it, he must have lost his " I'm offended" quote this time.
LOL- YOU ARE ALL SCREWED.
She did better than all of you in this thread, smarter and much more correct.
Empty opinion?
April 14, 2007 - 09:07 ET by gfrrmanSport, I don't know what crawled up your a** this morning, but you sure as H3LL either didn't read my comment or you can't comprehend it. And to sum up most of what you've posted this morning is nothing but a bunch of "opinionated" disjointed incoherant mumbo jumbo!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Yeah sure gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 09:54 ET by SportPoliticsYeah sure gfrrman. You "say" she couldn't defend the conservative position, but she DID on H&C, and HAS on The View, in between getting shouted down and interrupted, which is always, as you should know.
Then you thought it was cute when you said you think she's not all that.
Great argument there bubba. Again nothing, a big fat goose egg.
Now, here's what crawled up my spine this morning:
A bunch of lying stupid conservative jerkofffs, who've suddenly changed their ideas on the free market and the dixie chicks along with Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes the 3 ~hours a day radio show guys.
Then, the anger from the babbling crew that Rosie didn't get canned yet in stead of IMUS, which certainly is not Hasselbecks fault.
She is the rare truth teller defending the free market here, against Hannnity and Colmes. It's just the half of the free market all you people, and I do not like.
OH WELL, principle is principle, and when the batter up doesn't go all your way and only cans one liberal leftist IMUS, and not all of THEM, and the fairness doctrine is breathing down your neck, it's time to throw out those principles, right ?
LOL - Instead of being a principled republican conservative like Hasselbeck and saying SHE thinks IMUS's words were wrong and offensive and if SHE ever says anything like that please do fire her.
LOL - SHE WINS.
Lying, treacherous, twisted republican conservative crybabies need to be straightened out.
Have a good day, don't worry, I'll get over it.
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 10:30 ET by gfrrmanSport-O, do me a favor and leave the drunken condescension for others. I don't buy your crap this morning one bit. Your stupor this AM has created a short term amnesia that has clouded your mind. You're reading things in my comments out of thin air. I never even commented on Hassleback being a conservative for one. I said she acted like a stupid moderate that has NO opinions, but I guess you couldn't see that through the hangover alcohol haze. I'm not arguing anything about her. You're the one with the chip on your shoulder this morning blowing incoherant rants in all directions. Maybe when you wake up and read your comments later you'll see what an ass you've made of yourself. You're like your drive home from the Pub this morning, all over the place. You don't make near the sense you think you do. The only things I commented on were the fact that Hassleback is a moderate(which I can't stand) and that I DO NOT think that she's all that attractive, like you and some others do around here. I think she is just plain stupid.
You don't know anything about me or my politics, yet you lump me in with all others here in your whiney scattered diatribe about an empty headed, bleach blonde that couldn't talk her way out of a f'ing closet. So take a nap and get over it and put the damn pipe down.
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
You're wrong again grffman.
April 14, 2007 - 12:50 ET by SportPoliticsYou're wrong again grffman. One, I don't do drugs, don't drink, and don't take any pills.
Next, you don't have anything but your smart a** mouth, just like a liberal, and the rest is empty no good nothing.
She's a moderate you say, but you cannot say why just like all the rest.
You "never commented on her being a conservative", but said she acts like a moderate with no opinions. LOL - but I'm the one not making sense. SHOVE IT dummy.
She said her opinion of what IMUS said is that he should not say it because we have a history of discrimination against various groups ( she did NOT name blacks in particular ), and he has a responsibility, and furthermore it was her opinion that the market AND the people have spoken on the matter. Well, she is correct about the latter, and she clearly KEEPS her stance concerning the former, PERSONALLY in public.
So, what exactly does your opinion of her looks have to do with how WRONG you are ?
How about this for your truth you cannot even state : " I wanted her to slam that hog Rosie and say she should be fired, and quit in protest to make the point,or make it happen by ripping her to shreds on the show."
Yeah, that's more what all the whiners here along with you really want. You want that or something close enough to it, and you haven't a clue what "moderate views" she takes.
It's just "your feeling" - like all the other touchy feely libs here ( formerly hardcore conservatives before little miss not so pretty body slammed you all to the ground with the free market and her opinion ) .
Oh, and I do know plenty about you, and your stances, mr 1 year and 17 weeks, that's always another slimeball excuse when a person is called to the carpet. " You don't know anything about me" !
Yeah, we've made fun of it here before, that special little phrase.
What's more pertinent ? "You don't know nothing about Hasselbeck" !
And what you DO know, from her little H&C clip - makes her a hardcore conservative with principle, who can STAND on her position and survive it, without any known hypocrisy that has come to mind from any of you, concerning her former "quotes" - which obviously are of a multitude considering how long NB has been putting on The View here.
SMACK. Enjoy it, you asked for it.
I never thought there would
April 14, 2007 - 15:51 ET by rainlillieI never thought there would come a day when I
would defend Elisabeth. I don't agree with her politics at all, but I think some
of the sexiest comments here are totally out of line. She said that she and
Rosie are friends and that they don't discuss politics off the show. Rosie also
said that the Elisabeth she has come to know off the show is totally different
than her on air persona. Rosie never said that Bush had something to do with
911, she said it was impossible for one of the towers to fall the way that it
fell.
I've watched the show and read the
transcript. I also think although Imus was out of line, his firing was far too
harsh. I don't agree with Hannity, O'Reilly or Rush, but I think they have a
right to free speech as long as they're not advocating violence.. and I have a right to turn the channel. This calling for
someone to be fired because you don't like what they said is really getting
out of hand. Yet if the sponsors pull their ads the companies don't have a
choice , but to let these people go, It's all about money.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
rainlillie...Take a long hike
April 14, 2007 - 15:59 ET by bigtimerrainlillie...
Take a long hike...with sporty, he is right up your aisle.
I am out of here, got better things to do like listen to some good music..Oldies but Goodies and throw a steak on the barbie...no GWing here!
LOL!
Yeah,that surely makes sense
April 14, 2007 - 16:59 ET by SportPoliticsYeah,that surely makes sense, she doesn't even support IMUS firing like me and Hasselbeck. She disagrees with Hasselbeck politics like you.
Oh well, nice try idiot.
So you own this site now?
April 14, 2007 - 17:15 ET by rainlillieSo you own this site now? I'll stay as long as I choose. You're behaving like a bully.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
By all means, rainlillie, sti
April 14, 2007 - 17:21 ET by RJBy all means, rainlillie, stick around and tell us about what you think are the "sexiest comments" (sic) you've seen today.
Every adult here understan
April 14, 2007 - 17:31 ET by rainlillieEvery adult here understands that was a typo...So now I'm letting
you in on the little secret.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
Oooohhhh, I get it! Thanks, rainlillie!
April 14, 2007 - 17:39 ET by RJOooohhhh, I get it! Thanks, rainlillie! Whatever would I do without your guidance?
Hey rainlillie, how come you talk in bold? Is it supposed to make your words more important?
....IS IT THE SAME AS TALKING IN CAPS? ...LIKE YOU'RE SHOUTING?
WHAT IF YOU TALK IN BOLD AND CAPS AT THE SAME TIME? WOULD THAT MAKE YOUR WORDS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT?
"Oooohhhh, I get it!
April 14, 2007 - 17:42 ET by rainlillie"Oooohhhh, I get it! Thanks, rainlillie! Whatever would I do without your guidance?"
You're welcome.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
"You're welcome"But
April 14, 2007 - 17:47 ET by RJ"You're welcome"
But you didn't answer my questions, rainlillie. If you're going to help keep me on the right path, you have to answer my questions.
It's not my job to keep y
April 14, 2007 - 17:53 ET by rainlillieIt's not my job to keep you on the right path. This will be my last
response to you, there isn't any point in going back and forth. Have a good
evening!
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
Are you that cold-hearted, rainlillie?
April 14, 2007 - 18:05 ET by RJAwww, man! I was polite and everything, rainlillie! How could you whisper secrets in my ear, with the suggestive promises it implies, and then just walk off? Are you that cold-hearted, rainlillie?
This is the most you had the
April 14, 2007 - 19:58 ET by bigtimerThis is the most you had the guts to stay on and respond lillie, what did the doc do prescribe you stronger meds...
I am shocked, you usually cut and run...lol!
Ouch RJ...You really hurt my
April 14, 2007 - 17:45 ET by bigtimerOuch RJ...
You really hurt my delicate little ears .......clear up here!
Think it helped lillie-pads sensibilities any?
LOL!
Hush, BT. ;^>rainlillie
April 14, 2007 - 17:51 ET by RJHush, BT. ;^>
rainlillie is providing guidance on my pathway. She's even telling me secrets. Who knows where this could lead?
the cold-hearted wench threw me out.
April 14, 2007 - 18:29 ET by RJBT, I think the cold-hearted wench threw me out. Will you take me back?
RJ"Keep away. The sow
April 14, 2007 - 18:47 ET by RDWRJ
I think the cold-hearted wench threw me out.
"Keep away. The sow is mine." The Exorcist
RJ,No can do...you told me to
April 14, 2007 - 18:47 ET by bigtimerRJ,
No can do...you told me to hush.
Hope you don't think I ever would do that unless I wanted too...
I just checked back in and saw all this....too funny!
bigtimer loves you
April 14, 2007 - 22:37 ET by tumbler_2007Yeah; nothing you ever do can turn bigtimer against you, Goebbels clone.
She is well aware you disseminate Big Lies as routine; meaning the LIE repeated ad nauseam, until it seems very true. BT has no problem with that. You dominated this entire thread all day; she didn't stand in your way, R J BS.-- This was far the most corrupt, dishonest thread ever seen in NewsBusters. But you had your way and BT collaborated. Surely you're both proud of yourselves.
Very
April 14, 2007 - 22:42 ET by bigtimerVery
rainlillie
April 14, 2007 - 16:04 ET by shawn228Not easy being civil on this site huh? All you did was state your opinion and "wham" your told to take a hike.
"Not easy being civil
April 14, 2007 - 16:15 ET by rainlillie"Not easy being civil on this site huh? All you did was state your opinion and "wham" your told to take a hike."
I agree.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
Oh looky here...We have three
April 14, 2007 - 16:27 ET by bigtimerOh looky here...
We have three of the four trolls here today all gathered and patting each other on the back...get your citizen X on over here and we will have the whole group of the Wayward Wind....the singing trolls in unison!
LaCucuRaza took a little time out.
"sexiest comments"
April 14, 2007 - 16:34 ET by RJAnd all whining because they don't get no R-E-S-P-E-C-T
But rainlillie gets the laugh of the day for "sexiest comments." Oops, rainlillie, did you think you were still drooling over at the Fredricks of Hollywood site? ;^>
Wasn't that great RJ ?
April 14, 2007 - 17:03 ET by SportPoliticsWasn't that great RJ how Hasselbeck helped takedown part of the liberal media machine, ya know, just what this site is about ...
Oh, sorry, you're still caught in your perverted sextalk with a liberal.
LOL- Im rofl
SCHLAM !
I for one could care less
April 14, 2007 - 17:06 ET by rainlillieI for one could care less if anyone here treats me with respect,
that's your choice, do what you must. I suggest you go back and read the thread
and you'll see references to Elisabeth's hair, her make up and a whole lot of
shallow nonsense. That is sexist and high school crap. If you disagree with her
do it without sounding like a 13 year old boy. Next you'll be saying you don't
like her because she has cooties... Good grief!
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed
public.
Yes bigtimer, you and RJ, troll liars
April 14, 2007 - 17:01 ET by SportPoliticsYes bigtimer, you and RJ, troll liars, too damned proud to admit you are wrong, and you are wrong.
Now rainlillie has your view of Hasselbeck's politics,she doesn't like em, and canning IMUS was too much.
LOL - whose little troll clone popped in ?
Geez, are you STILL ranting a
April 14, 2007 - 17:12 ET by RJGeez, are you STILL ranting and raving, Sport/Tumbler? You're a real Howler Monkey, aintcha? ;^>
"The smallish Howler Monkey is equipped with a unique throat apparatus that enables it to make a loud roar like the larger gorilla. If you venture into an area containing howlers up in the trees be advised that the monkeys will harass you by throwing anything they can get their hands on. It's very amusing."
Just because I disagree wit
April 14, 2007 - 17:27 ET by rainlillieJust because I disagree with Elisabeth's
politics, doesn't mean that I don't agree with her on other things. Who knew
people on this forum had to see eye to eye on everything in order to treat each
other with common decency and respect.
The biggest threat to the Bush Administration is an informed public.
Geez sport, what did I star
April 14, 2007 - 17:08 ET by MightyMouthGeez sport, what did I start? Just suggested Liz is a little light in the political apptitude and you go off the reservation. What up wit dat?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Ahh, ok I'm off the reservation
April 14, 2007 - 17:20 ET by SportPoliticsAhh, ok I'm off the reservation.
Like I said, she did great on H&C, all nice takedowns of Alan and Pelosi and Sharpton and all the rest.
But ya know, I don't see anyone here who would do better on the view, with 3 libs and an audience.
Be honest and go look at her text. She's 100% conservo.
She has a good angle on why not now and why not IMUS, I'd say that was an original application in the situation.
So it's just a dumb blonde, NOT.
Smarter than many if not most here. Plenty of self control (far more than I obviously), can't be accused of not getting along with the lib dems, and ALL the conservative beliefs.
That is a stealth bombshell.(<there's your chance RJ) LOL It fooled the playas here.
Much should be learned from her participation, and if not learned, at least appreciated.
"all nice takedowns of A
April 14, 2007 - 17:32 ET by MightyMouth"all nice takedowns of Alan and Pelosi and Sharpton and all the rest"
I think a few of us were waiting for the "take down" on Rosie. Which never happened. So this stealth "bombshell" maybe a stealth conserv when it comes to giving Rosie the b*tch slapping she so richly deserves.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Yes Mighty Mouth
April 14, 2007 - 18:03 ET by SportPoliticsYes Mighty Mouth, but then how many of you would do better ?
Of course after she did fine on H&C, but the idiocy creamed on, all over the page.
And yet, not a single crybaby liar here will retract or provide the malicious quote, or admit that they went on a raving loonfest, and have a real conservative in Hasselbeck, that believes all the standard things said here, and has shown she can express them when not surrounded by fatso loudmouth.
Isn't that a problem, a big problem in the republican party, or the conservative movement, and lately at this site ? " I'm a bigger conservative than you, and you aren't even a conservative really at all. " ( even when it just is not true at all )
Throw her over the side of the boat, no problem.
EH - Anti abortion, pro war, pro bush, pro no pullout, pro can the lib press jerk IMUS,....anti Pelosi, and on and on and on. Took out 2 vessels of the let wing press as an assist, and Hannity and Colmes agree she is wrong.
LOL - Dixie chicks, but Hasselbeck is a mental lightweight.
Yeah, she's not up to par. Like hell.
I'm off the reservation though, and all you high and mighty real conservatives can really line up those Hasselbeck lib stances.
Yeah, I'm still pissed, really. What a bunch of crap.
She jabbed Rosie twice. Not good enough. She challenged Sean on Rosie's quote, HE FAILED to deliver.
This WHOLE THREAD has failed to deliver that.
Yeah, it's her job, to throw her job over the edge, so you people can stop lying about her, as she goes over the edge.
Great. You people are the best conservative friends one could hope for. Man what short sighted hateful CRAP.
~ I enjoy having a responsibility. I looked forward to opposing her on everything. ~
So she is supposed to "take down" Rosie, as your conservative favorite Sean Hannity PROPS ROSIE UP.
You people need another reaming, still. You're not done being complete morons.
Hannity flies in the face of conservative principle protecting IMUS AND ROSIE, AND HIMSELF, AGREEING WITH ALAN, And you have a disappointm,ent about the conservative ( called the weak one) who won't throw out her job for all of you.
If it didn't stink so bad to high heaven, I wouldn't be off the reservation.
First off, I would never ki
April 14, 2007 - 18:15 ET by MightyMouthFirst off, I would never kick the likes of Hasselbeck out of be.. er the boat.
Second, she gave Rosie a pass, regardless if you're willing to admit it or not.
And Third, IS THERE A DOCTOR IN THE HOUSE? SICK MAN! SICK MAN!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Yes, I am the sick man, sure I am.
April 14, 2007 - 18:28 ET by SportPoliticsYes, I am the sick man, sure I am. You my dear are the sick one. Go look at your first post.
The only thing your sick minds wants is Hasselbeck to declare she is the marketplace and the people, and of course, make her job impossible in the process.
You fools don't even want Hannity to get back on the reservation, because he has said the marketplace is WRONG,as it took out the competition.
She gave you every chance, she dissed Rosie twice, and she said she opposes everything she says, on a daily basis.
But you morons want the last pound of flesh.
You people are amazingly stupid, and incredibly arrogant.
Hannity invites Sharpton on, but also wants Hasselbeck to agree he's a filthy racist/race baiter, which she did, and wants to oppose her on the IMUS firing, destroying the longheld premise established against the crybaby liberals with Dixie Chicks, and to add insult to injury, Hasselbeck should throw herself over the edge onto the rocks below, because the public and the market has spoken ?
LOL - NO - they haven't, sorry. If Hasselbeck defends Rosie after the market outcry and her getting force fired off The View, why then you will have a point.
Until then, it's all your opinion in the wind, and the market doesn't agree with it, and neither should Hasselbeck.
You might say Hasselbeck jumped the gun then, on IMUS, but she had her finger on the pulse of the market.
She might be correct this time as well.
Sport: It doesn't matter that Imus is "the competition"
April 14, 2007 - 18:54 ET by RJWorking concepts: Both Hannity and Colmes are correct. Hasselbeck is wrong. Hasselbeck has a double standard. It's irrelevant that Imus is "the competition."
First, Imus was dumped by a small group of engaged leftists, not by "popular demand" or "market forces." Hasselbeck obviously doesn't see that, andshe doesn't see (as do Hannity and Colmes) that it sets dangerous free speech precedent, which could reach to talk radio and even the internet. Your Dixie Chicks comparison doesn't fly, because they weren't dumped by their bosses or financial backers. The loss of business they experienced was easily more representative of "the market" than what happened to Imus.
Second, Hasselbeck said that since Rosie apologized, it was ok for her to stay on the show, but she also said that Imus apologizing wasn't enough. She followed by claiming that Rosie wasn't "malicious" (implying that Imus was), when Rosie clearly is one of the most malicious of talking heads. This is a double standard.
Third, as I said elsewhere, after reviewing the H&C tape, I have changed my mind slightly about Hasselbeck. I now think she clearly tells us she's trying to figure out exactly what a conservative is supposed to be. SHE EVEN CALLS HERSELF A "CONTEMPLATIVE CONSERVATIVE", AND SAYS "I DON'T DEFINE MYSELF AS A CONSERVATIVE." That, of course, fits in with my earlier comment about "playing a conservative on TV."
I expect that you will understand none of this, Sport, and that it will set you off on yet another incomprehensible rant, but hey, that's life.
RJ,Like I said earlier in one
April 14, 2007 - 19:02 ET by bigtimerRJ,
Like I said earlier in one of my first posts about all of this...
She hemmed and hawed...
I do not think Sporty understands the concept of that.
The next shift is arriving. Time to go.
April 14, 2007 - 19:14 ET by RJWell, that's my story and I'm stickin' with it... ;^>
P.S. I think the next shift is arriving. Time to go.
Good riddance
April 14, 2007 - 19:21 ET by shawn228Don't let the door hit you on the way out RJ
Gettin into the swing of thin
April 14, 2007 - 19:32 ET by bigtimerGettin into the swing of things aren't ya shawnie...
Feeling pretty brave right about now aren't ya...troll?
LOL!
hello bigtimer
April 14, 2007 - 19:52 ET by shawn228Yes BT, I'm a big troll. Hope you enjoyed your steak on the barbie. My comments were for RJ not you. Have good evening.
You seem to not understand, but it's only "seem" BT
April 14, 2007 - 20:14 ET by SportPoliticsYou seem to not understand, but it's only "seem" BT, as it was explained to you, even though it really shouldn't had to have been.
Shall we go over it again, where she first declares she is fully conservative, and always has been, and then when she gets into Alan trying to label her, she broadens the appeal, and asks that people not view with labels, and pay attention instead ?
Of course, if you paid attention, as I pointed out, your answer would be " CONSERVATIVE". You didn't think it would be, but yeah, it is. Misdirected rage for Rosie is the reason.
I don't know, maybe she believes expanding welfare, instead of making sure people pay consequences. Maybe she is against the war, now that she was for it. Maybe she changed her mind about Pelosi, or her CLEAR hint about the next election.
Maybe fat pigs flew out of her ugly butt on the H&C set too.
RJ
April 14, 2007 - 19:12 ET by gfrrmanRJ, you too can be clairvoyant this evening and have Sport-Os packaged response by looking at any of his incoherant posts from today. Of course you will need a super-keen Sport-O decoder ring to decipher the content. Damn those facts!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
There's an exchange going on above and below you gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 19:36 ET by SportPoliticsThere's an exchange going on above and below you gfrrman, your idiot troll buddy actually tried to respond, but he already has a rebuttal posted, and neither of you have the facts correct, since I do.
Nice tagalong idiocy by you though. Maybe you'll have a thought sometime next week, insulting idiot troll.
alGore
April 14, 2007 - 19:47 ET by gfrrman"There is no debate"........"I'm right and you're not so shut up!!"....Al Gore(Sport-O)
"I will not listen to any other point of view..it is settled whether you like it or not"....(Sport-O with his eyes closed and his hands over his ears, stammering around the room screaming nah-nah, nah-nah...)
Definition of a liberal?...see above.
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
lol - roflmao gffrman - when you're wrong with nothing
April 14, 2007 - 20:20 ET by SportPoliticslol - roflmao gffrman - when you're wrong with nothing, that's how it goes.
RJ tried, I listened and responded, quite effectively. Hey gotta hand it to RJ, he finally at least made an attempt, after hours of NONE of you doing so.
However, I made a gigantic point about Hasselbeck not jumping the market forces not that long ago. That's solid, and you know it.
LIVE WITH IT.
SP,You are just a mental-ca
April 14, 2007 - 20:38 ET by bigtimerSP,
You are just a mental-case troll.
Always have been..you have got away with it pretty good so far but you exposed for all to see today...you let the sun-shine in, you only usually do this at night.
Whoda thunk it, BT? This guy is a drooler.
April 14, 2007 - 21:38 ET by RJWhoda thunk it, BT? Sport/Tumbler is even more nutty than Tumbler. Tumbler is demented but this guy is truly, truly a drooler.
Well, thought I'd look in one last time tonight. Got a chuckle that little shawnie did his tough guy dance, shaking his fist at me immediately after I left. Funny. See ya later.
RJ,Yeah well I took care of l
April 14, 2007 - 21:56 ET by bigtimerRJ,
Yeah well I took care of little shawnie after you split... for now that is...they always come back.
Lol...you'd do the same for me.
Btw...If you have repented for telling me to hush, I will take you back...deal?
This has been funny really! The Comedy Channel couln't do better than Sport.
Catch ya later RJ.
Dear R J
April 14, 2007 - 23:26 ET by tumbler_2007Pardon; --Is there some reason you call Tumbler demented, other than your urgency in pushing the Big Lie ?
In my months-long argument over illegal immigrants' inherent humanity and rights to respect, all you've done is try to promote the lie that Tumbler is just "demented." --For a day or two this is OK as a rhetorical device. I can't be too bothered by that, R J. After all, you're having to struggle and grope.
But months later we see you still arguing that Tumbler is off his rocker. A nut.
Is this justified by the tenor of my posting? Do the rest of those here see evidence of that mental problem which you assign to me ? I wish we could have even one impartial person corroborate your accusation.
Just suppose somebody were to say here; R J is the offspring of brother and sister matings? R J -- Born of an incestuous union ? But-- without any proof of the allegation. All we'd see is an unsubstantiated BIG LIE out of some opposition source. Would you like to be known as your Daddy's nephew, and Mama's as well ? Just because a hare-brained liar says so in an Internet website? This may not seem relevant here; but you don't care if there's no proof, evidence of dementia in me. You'll give it more air time; tell the lie over and over. You'll promote an insanity here, among otherwise decent and fair observers. Do you think they'll concurr with you if you keep on repeating something so absurd?
Believe me, I have nothing to prove. If others agree with you, let them. But I wonder why, when you're opposing Tumbler, you have problems coming up with a substantive, credible argument or accusation. All you have is "demented". Where is it getting you, and YOU-- calling that other guy a DROOLER ? You drool all over this site, Big Liar. You're all wet !
Responding so you can't edit
April 14, 2007 - 23:40 ET by BlondeResponding so you can't edit this.
Thanks, Blonde
April 15, 2007 - 11:49 ET by RJThanks, Blonde. I wondered when the demented one would show up. He patrols the threads, looking for places to bring us his special point of view. ;^>
De nada, RJ.I just tired of a
April 15, 2007 - 12:11 ET by BlondeDe nada, RJ.
I'm just tired of all of Tumbler's vile invective, and then when no one responds, he goes back and edits.
I thought I'd leave all of his creepiness, including referring to himself in the third person, out there for all the world to see, while he whines on about being called "demented".
Proof of the pudding, wouldn't you agree?
....did a Vulcan mind-meld and became Sport/Tumbler...
April 15, 2007 - 12:28 ET by RJYes, absolutely. It's especially humorous that he complains of being called "demented"....as he shows exactly why in the same post.
You missed the fun yesterday, Blonde. Sport and Tumbler did a Vulcan mind-meld and became Sport/Tumbler. They put on quite a show for us. ;^>
Proof of the pudding??
April 15, 2007 - 12:33 ET by misterbillProof of the pudding?? Oh what a help--that alone is enough to keep me from pudding in my dessert. Psychosis is a word that fits the tums man.
Good afternoon, misterbill,An
April 15, 2007 - 12:37 ET by BlondeGood afternoon, misterbill,
An old phrase, but a good one.
Good to see you here today, friend.
Blonde--I am oftentimes moved-
April 15, 2007 - 12:59 ET by misterbillBlonde--I am oftentimes moved-to serious bouts of love of my country. It was Philip Nolan who said: (quoting Sir Walter Scott)
Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne'er within him burn'd
When Tumbler gets on and starts his idiotic drivel, I realize that even though born in this country, his heart is not here. He cannot understand how Americans like you and me see the crossings of illegals as an almost quiet invasion of our country. He foresees a day with far more illegals here--the ones he refers to as "little brown people" where he can assert his imagined superiority over them. How petty a mind and heart to be as he is!
No man rises by lowering the status of those around him!
here's the only guy in America
April 15, 2007 - 13:28 ET by tumbler_2007Ho-hum;
Here we see the ONLY person ever to read a poem who loves America. He's the original Yankee Doodle, nobody else loves our country.
It's purely up to misterboil whether we love America or don't qualify as lovers of America. If he points a finger at you, fahggiett aboutit! You don't love your country and you're just a traitor!
What can a guy say? Man, I always loved my country. In various posts here, NewsBusters; I recounted how there are literally THOUSANDS of hispanic-Americans and Mexican-Americans who were decorated for heroism under fire, and who gave their lives on all the great battlefields and shores --FOR AMERICA !
But to the stout patriot mister boil; these are just Beaners. Not good Americans like him and his cohorts in this site. He's not even sure old Tumbler loves America ! No way, Jose, you do NOT have any love for our country; misterboil has SPOKEN !!! Lol! If he weren't such a damn BUFFOON, I'd get upset.
But he's a harmless windbag. Just big bocca, no serious thought process. Recite that nice poetry, misterboil, and save the lectures, please.
she couldn't take the heat
April 15, 2007 - 13:38 ET by tumbler_2007Blonde couldn't allow my last contribution to stay ? Deleted already ?
Just proving what I said n that space above (now deleted)--
These are dishonest people. They'll contravene the very integrity of NewsBusters, blotting out anything that seems unfavorable to themselves. If you don't march in lockstep behind Blonde, R J BS, Dave R, Rogering the Sphincter, et al-- You get silenced by their blogsite "problem-solver". He only accepts Knee-jerk Bots.
I'm just too hot to handle.
/
Nothing valuable
April 15, 2007 - 13:44 ET by RJNo, Tumbler, you're just a run-of-the-mill Troll, with nothing valuable to add to the blogosphere.
Tumbler,You should carefully
April 15, 2007 - 14:01 ET by BlondeTumbler,
You should carefully consider your accusations here.
Weren't you the one whining about proof?
And I agree with RJ, you have nothing useful to contribute.
Done with you.
it's already proven
April 15, 2007 - 14:09 ET by tumbler_2007The proof was emailed weeks ago to our editors. They have your threatening PM to Tumbler, when you bragged you were allowed to censor me or ban me forever if it PLEASED YOU; not for any real cause. You bragged !
I don't have to prove what YOU said for me. Who is whining now ? Blonde; an authority over other posters on NB ? I'm most certainly contributing real value today; having exposed your dirty laundry for all to see & think about. YOU don't believe in free speech for all; only free for you & the other racists. NewsBusters ought to start monitoring EVERY post you show here. It would be the end of you, Dear Blonde --
Trolls have short lifespans.
April 15, 2007 - 15:42 ET by RJTrolls have short lifespans. Use yours wisely, Tumbler.
Good will ambassador from Ame
April 15, 2007 - 16:28 ET byGood will ambassador from American hispanic community
T- from your profile. Is this how you do that? just reminding you
thank you, my friend
April 15, 2007 - 16:33 ET by tumbler_2007Thanks for moving my post back to the top of the line. (Not so short a lifespan that way.) Ciao, and thanks!
se above before you edit this
April 15, 2007 - 16:33 ET byse above before you edit this again
dear botg
April 15, 2007 - 16:41 ET by tumbler_2007I'm always here for good will's sake.
When we're dealing with dishonest people, the best way is to stand firm. Yesterday all my posts were simply deleted. Today a few more. If every time you made a comment here, the "botg" post vanished after a minute or two, would you figure the ones who don't want you showing them up are deleting for good will's sake?
I didn't think so. Just be fair and tell them only the truth. The truth will set you free, botg !
If you continue in MY doctrin
April 15, 2007 - 16:51 ET byIf you continue in MY doctrine then are you MY disciples and you will know The truth and The truth will set you free. You are not telling The truth and you aren't He who is to be followed. And a good will ambasserdor shouldn't be pissing a bunch of people off.
while I still live, R J
April 15, 2007 - 16:55 ET by tumbler_2007Gee; I only have a short time left, R J BS;
Tell us about the smallish Howler Monkey equipped with a unique throat apparatus that enables it to make a loud roar; that was your only good post on the blogosphere over the last few months. Do that one again, be a Sport. (SportPolitish would love it again too.)
if R J would repeat that
April 15, 2007 - 17:18 ET by tumbler_2007If R J would repeat the one about those Howler Monkeys (smallish) he would turn a new page. Yeah; for once he would be telling us just the truth!
Repeat the truth, R J. Let's hear the smallish Howler Monkey megillah once more. Some people around here would start to like you again. I wouldn't be surprised.
Yes, a nice excuse, but not sufficient RJ
April 14, 2007 - 19:19 ET by SportPoliticsYes, a nice excuse, but not sufficient RJ, at least you finally tried to make an argument, and it is this: " It wasn't the market that canned IMUS, but it was that canned the Dixie Chicks ."
Well, you don't have any proof of that do you ? LOL NONE !
Clear Channel was one of the right wing forces that knocked the Dixie Chicks off, just as the advertisers responded along with ABC in this case( or Al's special hit crew, or whatever force you won't name). The liberals will claim the same "dangerous" right wing forces levelled the Dixie Chicks, as you will claim got rid of IMUS from the other side. In fact now you both have.
Just because the advertisers amounted to "backers" of IMUS, as you refer to backers of the Dixie Chicks, the advertisers sold to the public just as the Dixie Chicks did. Each market force responded to the public, and acted in their best interest. IMUS/ABC advertisers had to sell products, just as the Dixie Chicks backers had to sell their music and concerts, in the end it was still the people that spoke through the free market.
You will both claim your side had broad appeal, while the other side had a small focused hit team, while they claim the opposite.
In other words, your rant that Hasselbeck is trying to figure out what a conservative is, is a zero, just like market force you want "zeroed" because you don't agree with it.
The "dangerous precident" is exactly in sync with the two radio jockeys who opposed Hasselbeck who stuck to the market forces even when you didn't want to, yet those dixie chicks forces were all the rave, and still are for you. Hasselbeck has correctly supported both, after the fact. A true conservative.
You are a partisan GASBAG. That's you. Nice try though, at least you tried, and exposed YOUR blatant hypocrisy, and lunatic stance, because broad appeal just could not be the case, if you just claim it isn't.
I guess the Rush firing wasn't a dangerous precedent, either, since only this IMUS thing is "establishing for you".
LOL - WOWZIE.
Whatever there RJ, I'm sure you didn't understand what you were trying to say.
No excuses needed.
April 15, 2007 - 15:37 ET by RJNo excuses needed, Sport/Tumbler. Just a little thoughtful logic...something that is clearly alien to your stream of consciousness blabbertysnatch. ;^>
MM...Past S.O.S. time for Spo
April 14, 2007 - 18:52 ET by bigtimerMM...
Past S.O.S. time for Sport!
BT,How was I supposed to kn
April 14, 2007 - 19:01 ET by MightyMouthBT,
How was I supposed to know Sport was married to Hasselbeck? (or is Hasselbeck) :-/
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM..There is NO WAY Sport cou
April 14, 2007 - 19:04 ET by bigtimerMM..
There is NO WAY Sport could be married...no way.
Unless she is deaf, dumb and blind.
Must be the second choice t
April 14, 2007 - 19:06 ET by MightyMouthMust be the second choice then, Sport IS Hasselbeck!!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Maybe the third choice is:
April 14, 2007 - 19:44 ET by SportPoliticsMaybe the third choice is, Sport has the correct facts and points, and the partisan liars don't like that. They much preferred their "first emotional reaction" that is attached to Rosie's fat butt, and flies in the face of their former stances on the market, and the dixie chicks, and all the rest, like calling a nice conservative "not one of us".
Well, not being nice is ok as long as it's someone you're ripping to shreds, huh. Then, when it's time to admit the mistake, you dig in those heels even more, making the lie irreversible for the present time frame.
Oh well, I do understand. Not like I blame you, but I do know you're aware of your big problem, all of you are.
All of us....Hint, hint.... S
April 14, 2007 - 19:49 ET by bigtimerAll of us....
Hint, hint.... Sport, take a long look in the mirror in the morning.
I won't need to BT
April 14, 2007 - 20:02 ET by SportPoliticsI won't need to BT, you're looking at it right now. I don't have to look at it, I have stood up for the truth, and you have NOT. You don't have till morning to look in the mirror. See that reflection right now.
Love it!!
April 14, 2007 - 19:52 ET by gfrrman"Well, not being nice is ok as long as it's someone you're ripping to shreds, huh. Then, when it's time to admit the mistake, you dig in those heels even more, making the lie irreversible for the present time frame."------Sport-O says as he looks in the mirror.
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Don't get me wrong sport er
April 14, 2007 - 19:56 ET by MightyMouthDon't get me wrong sport er Liz... Hasselbeck is a really cute conservative. I mean that... really cute ... and oh so conservative. But like I said at the begining of this disaster of a thread, H&C gave her a pass, she gave Rosie a pass and she is just eye candy compared to conserves like michelle malkin, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingrahm. ( Who are all also eye candy btw). She is fluff for a show that is fluff. I say again FLUFF, something you have now sucessfully turned yourself into in my eyes!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM...LOL!Just a little fluffy
April 14, 2007 - 20:00 ET by bigtimerMM...
LOL!
Just a little fluffy fuzz ball of love ain't he?
Pi**ed
April 14, 2007 - 18:44 ET by gfrrmanSport-O, the louder you scream, the less and less you have to say. And you've been psycopathically wild since this morning. Your point is, you don't have a point and have no desire to hear any other than your own. Your day long screeching rants sound just like an out of control Cindy Sheehan that thinks he has moral authority on the issue. Your scattered thoughts have made no sense ALL F'ING day!! Take your meds, a hot shower and try again another day. It's not attractive at all. As a matter of fact you've made a fool of yourself. Nice going!! No need to reply, I already know the packaged response. Geez
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
gf,OMG...I am really and trul
April 14, 2007 - 18:50 ET by bigtimergf,
OMG...I am really and truly laughing out loud now!
Especially last sentence...too much...side-splittin'!
Good for a cheap idiot thrill, huh BT
April 14, 2007 - 18:54 ET by SportPoliticsGood for a cheap idiot thrill, huh BT. We'll see if dummy,or you or mightymouth has a response that is anything but gfrrman's package of crap.
Congratulations, another jerkoff troller without a clue or a response.
LMAO!
April 14, 2007 - 18:58 ET by bigtimerLMAO!
bt
April 14, 2007 - 19:18 ET by gfrrmanbt, I see Sport-Os' packaged response have shortened. Looks like he got tired of c & p'ing his own posts and the meds are short-circuiting his thought. That's got to be tough to have a whole day of mental process melt-down. Take your binkie with you Sport-O!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
No since you didn't make an argument gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 19:21 ET by SportPoliticsNo since you didn't make an argument gfrrman,there was no need to refute your idiocy, other than to point out it was exactly what you lyingly claimed I have delivered. Too stupid to figure that out as well, aren't you.
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 19:32 ET by gfrrmanSport-O, through sheer stupidity, you can't see the forrest through the trees. As has been said ad nauseum today, there is no argument with one who has his head up his rear and refuses to hear anything other than his own posts. YOU'RE right and everyone else is wrong. Period. alGore would be pround..."there is no debate"...THAT has been your BS line all day. In your padded cell, you are arguing with yourself..you can't and won't hear anything else except what is in your shallow cranium. Go ahead and c & p....it's embarassingly comical....YOU jut can't see it. Look!..it's the idiot in the glass booth. One dollar please and move all the way to the LEFT!!!. LMAO....AT YOU!!!! You're sad, so sad.
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Blow it out your ear grffman
April 14, 2007 - 18:51 ET by SportPoliticsBlow it out your ear grffman, read the post above yours( mine prior to this) , then find it somewhere in your ignorance to respond instead of run like everyone else in this thread.
Just like a lib
April 14, 2007 - 19:00 ET by gfrrmanWow, such intellectual thought there Sport-O. Just the liberal response I expected. You are way too predictable. Once again you have NO POINT...it's all day long old. What an embarrassment. Tumbler incarnate. When you have NO POINT, scream louder. You've c & p'd your own posts all day long. What a f'ing genius!! ROTFLMFAO!!! at YOU!!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Just saying it is a lie gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 19:26 ET by SportPoliticsJust saying I don't have a point is a lie gfrrman. You have no effective response to the many points I made, so the truth is, you're a ranting lunatic now, not me.
Would you like to comment on the market forces like idiot RJ finally decided to try, since you fagged out ? His was a simple " my market forces are broad, theirs is not".
Pretty easily seen as a big partisan fat lie. It's always an unfair hitjob when you're too stupid to agree. IMUS was his precedent, he forgot about Rush.
LOL - There ya go moron.
Now there's pressure on the rap artists. The market is responding, will there be a hit job, or will the "broad market" take down the rappers ? Or neither.
LOL - Ask RJ, he knows what is broad appeal and what isn't, and what percentage of market participants equates to that, with each "sale item" in question representing far less than, what, 10% of the item purchasing public ?
Sport, You know I got to reme
April 14, 2007 - 19:40 ET by bigtimerSport,
You know I got to remembering the first time I saw you post and the exchange between us...
I was right.
Oh really what were you right about BT ?
April 14, 2007 - 19:59 ET by SportPoliticsOh really what were you right about BT ? Either that's a veiled insult, which is likely,or you actually remembered how you "won" something ? Yeah, I'll tell you what I remember, and it sure isn't "the first time" with you. I remember you basically telling me to get ph#cked, in a similar situation a while back, because I wouldn't give in to the lies.
Well, too bad, I'm correct again, and I proved it.
All your fantasies about her faux conservatism are just that. Now,of course, your idiot side with RJ has gone onto claiming "she is trying to leanr how to pretend to be one" - onlyof course after a good look at "her horrible" FoxNews interview, the truth is as plain as the 10 points unrefuted.
Now, what evil thing have you remembered ?
SP,I didn't say it was evil,
April 14, 2007 - 20:14 ET by bigtimerSP,
I didn't say it was evil, or that I called you anything, or any back and forth other than I posted something to you and you came back screeching with a long whatever, I have basically stayed away from you most times, and I have also never told you to get ph#cked until today and you know it.
You were strange then with your anger...and you haven't changed one bit.
Since the time has passed and I do not really care what the subject was I have usually stayed away from you if you have ever noticed (with the exception of you screaming at the top of your lungs at sarc,then we did get into it after-all this time) one thing I always do is stick up for somebody I know on here and believe in, no matter if I agree with their slant towards politics and life, I respect them and their views, whether they are present or not when someone else attacks them... you are either a troll, or you have real problems with communicating with others.
Good-luck fella.
Yes,of course,now you're the pure one,huh BT
April 14, 2007 - 20:40 ET by SportPoliticsYes,of course, now you're the pure one, huh BT. Oh you've done it before, I certainly remember, and the truth is I have avoided your emotional posts for some months. you are usually way too many exclamation points.
Won't say I'm not emotional, but now you want respect when your and others opinions here have been equivalent to flat out liberal trolling liars.
You don't respect me at all, nor yourself, because you'll hang onto your lie until the end, just like the piece of crap libs.
Not one of you thought about it. I've gone back and read that first page from the top, and there isn't anything to respect. It's a bunch of piling on in a huge bashfest.
The shameful thing is, it only got worse, and even now, far beyond the truth being told, I'll watch the lies and arrogant pride make the falsity pretend to be stronger.
Just yesterday you were ranting about how furious the right has made you by not hitting harder. I saw it. I remember it. So now today, you're to the point that a good conservative is an empty bag of blonde stupidity.
Ya know, I love to toot my horn ever the more, because I have a point. Get off your high horse, and make a reasonable assessment, instead of some angry rant that spills over into Hasselbeck, comdemning her as an empty head.
I know the pretend rule. It's ok if it's a lib or alternately, anyone that isn't here. Well, that's a big pile of crap rule, especially when it's a false attack against a conservative, claiming "my creds" are tighter and stronger than theirs.
No proof at all of that to this very moment, but oh what the hell, you and a bunch of people got out that angry disrepectful rant, but of course, I'm the one with the problem.
LOL - Yeah, good luck to me, the one refusing the stupid incorrect piling on. Yeah, I've got the anger problem. Only you're so mad "all the conservatives" aren't doing it for you.
Before the last election, I gave my opinion and warning about this "they didn't do what we elected them to do" crap. Instead of increasing the numbers of solid rank republicans, the gang of 7/14 and parlaimentary procedure was ignored, in favor of the common and sensationalized " throw the bums out" fever that pretended the vast majority blew it.
Well it's still around, the fever, that is. That's what this thread is about, the fever, and how it got slapped on one who doesn't deserve it. Yeah, that fever is great, it sure makes the "cred" impressive.
Her parents were both independents and taught her to think instead of pick parties, so she is a conservative, quite obviously, and is voting republican in '08- as she stated, but that ain't good enough.
She's an empty headed blonde.
It's fever time.
Twilight Zone.'nuff said.
April 14, 2007 - 20:46 ET by bigtimerTwilight Zone.
'nuff said.
Sport,By the way, before I cl
April 14, 2007 - 21:09 ET by bigtimerSport,
By the way, before I close tonight, I forgot to tell you, you may want to learn a little something from uc.
uc, if you are here and see this, it is a compliment for you.
Point?
April 14, 2007 - 19:40 ET by gfrrmanSport-O, you haven't made a coherant point ALL DAY. That's not debatable. Market forces, blah,blah,blah...You've been all over the map all day and haven't made a single point. NONE. Go ahead and c & p....it's coming!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Yeah whatever lunatic
April 14, 2007 - 19:51 ET by SportPoliticsYeah whatever lunatic, I already destroyed your idiot speil, the one you made, then tried to defend as you ranted I don't know you.
Go blow old liar. You and balboa can have a lovefest, where understanding is reduced to claiming the opponent has said nothing.
10 points of conservatism by EH.
Hypocrisy on the dixie chicks
Demands for EH to jumpahead of the market and the people forces she has supported consistently, and if not immense lies about her issue, already dealth with in the 10 points in the same H&C interview.
Then there's H&C's personal agenda for their jobs, that they want protected while they demand EHjump ther market the market forces and throw hers out, but it took EH to do the open disclosure on the agenda.
LOL - Ya just can't win, no matter how long you rant and rave.
Let me give you a tip there troller. Cross your fingers, hold your breath, and hopelike heck EH says something soon, just one thing, even taken out of context if you can pull it off, that makes all the ten points none of you turds would touch in this thread worthless.
Hey, even when it doesn't at least you can pull some crap, and pretend it does. That will make youjust like the liberals you've been fighting here. I bet you can hardly wait, as if you haven't become one already.
Ya think I forgot you claimed you weren't commenting on her conservatism , you just said she acts and argueslike a moderate ? LOL
Keep'em coming.
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 20:02 ET by gfrrmanSport-O, nice cut and paste. Ho-hum, I read that same BS 12 hours ago. Just like a liberal, you keep repeating a lie often enough and it will become reality. You've even convinced yourself. That straightjacket must suck!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Gffrman, why don't you go troll somewhere else ?
April 14, 2007 - 20:07 ET by SportPoliticsGffrman, why don't you go troll somewhere else ?
Since you won't engage any points, you're a useles piece of crap.
I'm sure it's easy to see for you isn't it, how you along with the rest have that slick willie finger shaking, lying through your teeth, after you've been caught. A little different because now it's just spite. Too bad, suck it up, because we both know.
Good thing you've got strength in your numbers, just like slick had.
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 20:22 ET by gfrrmanHere's a point I will refute. I haven't lied. Go back and tell me where I've lied. I've called you on your ad nauseum cut and paste drivel ALL DAY. You haven't made a coherant point ALL DAY...that's a fact. What have I been caught in? Huh?, fess up !!! And you now that you have run out of BS to say you resort to the liberal tactic of the childish name calling. Wah, wah, I'm not getting my way......SO lame and predictable...just like your posts ALL DAY!!
Hassleback IS a moderate(meaning she has no CONVICTION either way until prodded on a subject). She's a stupid, airheaded blonde(sorry Blonde) that has difficulty gathering a train of thought when approached. She said that it was fine that Imus was fired, yet Rosie gets a pass for the "Ching, Ching, Chong" episode. Imus apologized and Rosie obsfuscated an apology. Yet she gives Rosie a pass. Hypocrite. FACT!
I'm ready for your cut and paste.
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
Ahh, the stupid airhead gfrrman finally tried a response
April 14, 2007 - 21:15 ET by SportPoliticsAhh, the stupid airhead gfrrman finally tried a response. You certainly didn't make much of it, and you haven't even tried to refute anything all day long until this post you just laid up.
Now Hasselbeck has no conviction. LOL She opposes everythnig the view libs say all day and all night, and whipped Hannity and Colmes soundly, yet she doesn't have any conviction, because, of course you mean, she isn't a go get 'em fighter. LOL
She never thinks about a thing, but she has been CORRECT everytime, on the View, and the vast conservative majority have agreed with her until this one today, INCLUDING YOU. So, she's just as empty headed as you are, except she is on a national show opposing the liberals.
So, she's not "activist" enough for you. That makes her a "mod", because until the fat hog brings it up, 'ol Hasselbeck doesn't have an opinion. LOL Rosie "prods" her. But after every prodding, the right wing conservative answer flies out of the "never thought about it" dumb blondes mouth.
Of course, with your SINGLE exception that isn't even correct, for the reasons I've thoroughly explained, and you have rantingly ignored, you finally whined out. Gee, never knew that was coming, huh mr cut and paste idiot. All that time, for you to express your feelings.
She hasn't been "prodded" by the market yet, to take her "moderate" opinion on firing Rosie. In fact, she didn't call for canning Sharpton and Jackson, she pointed out they "have a voice in the issues".
Now, mr IMUS wasn't voicing the issues, he was caught "attacking blacks", after along string of bigotted jokes.
She pointed out, Rosie doesn't have that history, and therefore ,it's logical assessment, that Rosie doesn't deserve a canning for the decades of "bigotryjokes".
So, she pointed out quite plainly WHY what Rosie said wasn't "the last straw", like it was for IMUS. She went trhough it step by step so stupid people like you could catch on. One slip vs- the ongoing string.
Now, you have a problem with other comments from Rosie, really, the 911 conspiracy comments, besides her political left wing stances, which make her single known bigottted remark, the equivalent in your mind of 30 years of IMUS doing it.
Well, I would simply say we don't have 30 years of that from Rosie, either. We've got one month, maybe, and I'm not sure what sort of denial Rosie has come up with, but it still misses the test of a long ongoing pattern that is considered unfair by the vast majority, in the same sense the racist remarks are.
If you paid attention, and or went and read the links, you would see Hasselbeck claiming the ongoing pattern of long abuse by IMUS as the REASON why something needed to be done.
So, you even missed her PROPER DEFENSE of the difference.
When Rosie disses conservatives, that doesn't count. One remark doesn't count, either. 30 years of race jokes counts for Hasselbeck. The demolibs who frequented IMUS' show,the big shots, a fewcame out and said " We really haven't considered the nature of the long ongoing racist and bigotted jokes, we just never really thought about it".
So, there you have it, ANOTHER reason why you are WRONG, and Hasselbeck is right.
Shocking I saved that till now, isn't it, you fool. Yeah,you really got me. YOU DUMMY.
For libs, once is enough, like "macaca" or like Trent Lott. For a conservative, it isn't, except for you, it is, because you're a smart thinking conservative who makes points.
LOL BOOM !
We are at war Sport, in case
April 14, 2007 - 21:24 ET by bigtimerWe are at war Sport, in case you haven't noticed, and the side Rosie has taken so far has been the terrorists, where have you been, and better yet where has EH been...what part of understanding that we are the good guys and Rosie is the enemy within?
There is no comparison between her and Imus that you are making as far as Imus and bigotry for thirty years and Rosie spewing the treasonous crap she does just about daily.
Btw...I detest Imus, but I have never thought of him as a bigot, just a simple-minded equal opportunity shock-jock.
We are at WAR!
Well BT, if it were that simple
April 14, 2007 - 21:44 ET by SportPoliticsWell BT, if it were that simple. Would you like to make the point more, that now the democrat party, or rather the 33% that responded the government covered something up, are in deep doodoo ? What kind of doodoo, other than Hasselbeck might have thought calling for firing Rosie on that grounds would backfire at this point.
I do understand some have attempted it, and it is a common stance from the conservative right, but so far, the wagon isn't rolling, is it.
It's quite understood and the "people against the war" I think, not sure, but think majority claim only to be against Iraq and not against Afghanistan. There are of course the peacenicks, who are against it all, not like they are missing. So what's the point ? Is the left going to call for firing them, or are you and Sean going to ? I bet that would go over well, all that silencing of the left... LOLOLOL
Hey, you know I don't find the "protesters" and much less the conspiracists palatable, but then I saw even the left claim IMUS had an ongoing long pattern, and I read something about his manager/sidekick getting canned and rehired a couple times for it. So he took bad in an offender, and continued, several times I think.
I don't know what to tell you. Hasselbeck made a reasonable well thought out argument that has backup to it, and it looks like she chose a good target. Rush was toasted for a one time deal from ESPN. Now that's a "dangerous precident", but IMUS has some history, and the "warnings" with the firing and rehiring.
So, you know, the Dixie Chicks took a hit for war protesting, but what are we going to do, fire every damned democrat there is except Lieberman?
Do you think calling for Rosie's firing on her 911 conspiracy is going to work ? She already has the depression medication excuse. She has half denied and modified, claiming "just the building" she said,right ? Not like I believe her, but she isn't full blown out there yet. After repeated episodes over some years, yeah maybe it matches IMUS, she has strike one going there. I don't know what else to tell you, except that ever since JFK's assassination, the democrats pretty much have something nutty out there, right ? Is Rosie any worse than the democrats who have implied war for oil, Bush sexed it up intel, and all the rest ? NOT REALLY. It's basically the SAME THING.
So, what to do, fire them all ?
You are a troll SP...always h
April 14, 2007 - 21:50 ET by bigtimerYou are a troll SP...always have been, you have done an exceptional job of lasting though, got to give you credit for that...
My gut instinct about you was right.
You have proved that with every word you have posted today.
For that... I thank you.
No BT, it's not that easy for you, you won't get away.
April 14, 2007 - 22:08 ET by SportPoliticsNo BT, it's not that easy for you, you won't get away.
You got a solid rebuttal from me, and you don't have a damned thing to say about it, other than it proves I'm right and you know it, so your cryptic bullcrap is a big fat zero.
What this has proven is I'm ten times deeper than you attack bots, and when it comes down to the facts, and comparing the apples with apples, you're out in the cold, and the dumb blonde has the leading edge on thought, smoking you silly,only you never paid attention, and WORSE YET:
You decided that she's a hypocrit, minimizing her "ongoing" long time period standard, in favor of the "one time" "hypocrisy", making the toasting of RUSH valid.
Who has called for Rosie to go over her bldg. 7 rant ? Not Hannity. I'm sure there's some republican congressperson. Got one in mind ?
Only seconds ago it was her racist remark, or some other thing. I guess that part flopped, and Hasselbeck's "not malicious", is rather reasonable, since it's "once".
So,what the heck is it that " you were right about ", other than you ought to listen up, and learn ? Hey, if you want Rosie gone, what about Durtbin ? Make sure to add him, and just about all the Pelosi demorats, right ?
Sure, that was a good one. "You were right about me".
You've been wrong the whole dang thread on the main points, but boy I've got problems.
Hey, WHATEVER.
SPHey, WHATEVER.
April 14, 2007 - 22:30 ET by bigtimerSP
Hey, WHATEVER.
"I'm ten times deeper&qu
April 15, 2007 - 11:54 ET by RJ"I'm ten times deeper" lololololol!!!!!! Put your boots on folks. Sport/Tumbler is piling it on and it's getting deep. ;^>
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 21:25 ET by gfrrmanYou've called me a liar more than once. Now prove it!!! Cut and paste the same thing? I've read it since this morning. Please provide a fact that I lied! Where is it Mr. "there is no debate"? I'm wrong? You've yet to prove it. Go ahead..I've waited long enough. You're a one trick pony....your incoherant babbling is tiresome and, disjointed and makes not a damn bit of sense. You seem to have ADL, because your thoughts are so scattered and have no continuity of thought whatsoever. Now point out the lie!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
One lie you have continuously told gfrrman
April 14, 2007 - 21:54 ET by SportPoliticsOne lie you have continuously told gfrrman is that I haven't made any points, and have "just ranted".
That's a LIE, and you've stated it many times. Now,you got a big fat whomper of a point from me after you finally came out with your opinion on "Hasselbeck's hypocrisy".
I guess you won't be rebutting ? Decades of a continuous pattern on the supertouchy race thing, repeated problems with re-hirings, the left admitting they hung with him and ignored it for a longtime, Rush getting toasted for "once", and Rosie having a "once" is the hypocrisy of Hasselbeck ?
It's laughable buddy. Hasselbeck established the long decades of ongoing "doing it" as the standard. She's SMART. That protects "hannity" and would have presumably protected "rush".
Once for Rosie, is not enough, or once for Rush IS.
I'm trying real hard not to let out a big insult now.
Sport-O
April 14, 2007 - 22:17 ET by gfrrmanNice pointless cut and paste. You lose again. Delusions and NO POINTS. Keep telling yourself that though. Keep pounding your head against the wall in the padded room and believing you own BS. THAT'S delusional. The looney show continues. Thanks for the cheap intertainment, however nutty. I've NEVER seen someone cut and paste their own BS for over 12 hours. Unbelievable. ROTFLMFAO!!!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
lol
April 14, 2007 - 22:25 ET by SportPoliticslol - buh bye little troll.
Just remember that moderate blonde thinks a lot more than you do. A lot deeper, and she got it correct for the conservatives.