Jet-setting Bands Overpopulate Gore's Live Earth


Low resolution image of Live Earth logo from Wikipedia

The April 10 London Daily Mail dares to say what others have not. Instead of a trendy story about green celebs, reporter Richard Simpson revealed an Inconvenient Truth; many of the musicians participating in Al Gore’s upcoming Live Earth concerts are major eco-offenders themselves:

The stars of a major Live 8-style concert to raise awareness of climate change have been condemned as hypocrites for failing to lead environmentally friendly lives themselves.

The likes of Madonna and Red Hot Chili Peppers will perform at Live Earth at Wembley Stadium on July 7, yet campaigners say they are among the least "green" individuals on the planet.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Environmental activists are unhappy with the hypocrisy of the stars who will perform in the concerts, yet not actually change their carbon-heavy lives. The eco-warriors criticized the celebs because they have “enormously large carbon footprints” due to their jet-set ways and toting around huge entourages on world tours. They set their sights on the aging pop diva Madonna and the aging and clothing-optional alterna-funksters the Red Hot Chili Peppers:

Last year, for example, they report how Madonna flew as many as 100 technicians, dancers, backing singers, managers and family members on a 56-date world tour in private jets and commercial airliners.

Madonna herself also has a collection of fuel-guzzling cars, including a Mercedes Maybach, two Range Rovers, Audi A8s and a Mini Cooper S. Yet she will headline the London concert to "combat the climate crisis".

"Madonna's Confessions tour produced 440 tonnes of CO2 in four months of last year. And that was just the flights between the countries, not taking into account the truckloads of equipment needed, the power to stage such a show and the transport of all the thousands of fans getting to the gigs.

"The Red Hot Chili Peppers produced 220 tonnes of CO2 with their private jet alone over six months on their last world tour which was 42 dates.

"The average a British person produces is 10 tonnes a year," said John Buckley, managing director-of CarbonFootprint.com.

And we’re the ones who need to change?

Like a man who knows where his bread is buttered, Buckley nominally criticized the celebs and then gave the typical unrealistic enviro advice that only makes sense to people who prefer a “planned” economy. To save Mother Earth, instead of a world-wide tour, Madonna should have one online concert. Nevermind the people who have jobs because of Madonna’s tour, reduced sound quality or consumer choice.

Buckley did say something logical. Celebs need to do more than “support the cause,” they need to change their lives. Good luck with that.

Kevin Wall, Live Earth founder, tried to rationalize the “monster line-up” of private jet-owners telling people to ride bikes to work and reuse sandwich bags to save the Earth, by claiming the concert will give “the world the tools they need” to stop global warming. Gore basically said the same thing, but added more hypocrisy that the Daily Mail didn’t address. He claimed the responsibility rests in the hands of “ultimately, corporations and governments.” What, they can’t buy carbon offsets like Gore and his celebrity friends instead of actually reducing their carbon output?


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Buckley did say somet

"Buckley did say something logical. Celebs need to do more than “support the cause,” they need to change their lives. Good luck with that."

Oh, I think we'll see some logical changes, but IMO what's likely is quite a bit more "stealth" on the part of these celebs when they're consuming. The goal will be to avoid this kind of bad press without actually experiencing any negative lifestyle consequences. Every time I fly I think about how much I'd rather fly on a private jet, especially post 9/11.
JMR

I, too, would MUCH rather fly

I, too, would MUCH rather fly on a private jet than crammed into a crowded passenger jet filled with obnoxious people, smelly bathrooms and notgreen movement or promoting the theory by performing at Live Earth, then their own lifestyles become open to scrutiny.

I think you're right. Most of these celebs aren't going to change their luxurious lives that come with great perks, and I don't think they'll go back to the "stone age" where we live. The hiding has already begun. Stars are sprinting to purchase Priuses and claiming to fly commercial airlines.

Leonardo DeCaprio, Angelina Jolie, Nancy Pelosi and Brad Pitt now claim to fly commercial. Jolie and Pitt are notorious for casually strolling through airports, carefully holding their children so their faces are seen, giving the impression that they frequently fly commercial instead of on a private jet-- not even the one they own. However, even a casual search through online tabloids finds many photos of them boarding a private jet.

TMZ.com exposed this hypocrisy last year by using cameras to out a few celebs who preach a green life but don't live one.

Part of my reasoning stems

Part of my reasoning stems from resentment of theft and property destruction (multiple incidents...) by the Thousands Standing Around. I'm apparently not on the "terrorist" list, but I am definitely on the "ransack his luggage every time" list. Although it's impossible to know why for sure, this is possibly because I've had the temerity to make-fun of the tax & spend drugwar for the past 3 decades while it's been failing miserably. Sigh.
JMR

Sarc, if you still think that

Sarc, if you still think that your theory is right, have you considered this no-fail plan? Next time you go to the airport, when you check your bags, DEMAND to talk directly to the baggage handlers and once they arrive (it often makes them feel appreciated to ask what took them so long), tell them about your suspicions. Let them know you care and tell them you want their names and ID numbers, because you play golf with the airline's VP of marketing.

Here's the key part. It is important that they understand the kind of person you are. Advise them that they'd better not mess with you because you are a very, very important personal injury lawyer who sues anyone who crosses you. If you really want to impress them, tell them that you make as much in one week as they do all year. Then they'll really respect you. Maybe toss in that you date a model, belong to MENSA and drive a Lamborghini. If that doesn't work, then you tell them that you want their

*This is not real advice. This is entertainment.

MENSA? Hell, if you show a

MENSA? Hell, if you show a TSA-dimwit in temporary authority over you ANY sign of independent intelligence (sarcastic humor especially unwelcome) you can expect far-worse treatment than I get from just totally shutting up & smiling in airports but being on the ransack-list. The TSA, when formed in a panic, basically got the dregs of Wackenhut and other private security companies by attracting "government" type employees who were barely getting by but at the same time were sorta hard to fire. Now they're all government employees, so there's no more "sorta," it's just really hard to fire them.
JMR

Always drop into any conver

Always drop into any conversation, "don't you know who I am." That always brings out the best in people.

"This is the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel,"

Rosie O'Donnell, Ph.Dumbass, Emeritus Professor of Stupid Wimmn's Studies, Clown University.

Oh, Sarc, I just love to twee

Oh, Sarc, I just love to tweek Libertarians on the drug issue.  Did you ever stop to consider if we actually took your advice and ended our supposedly "failing miserably" action against drugs, that at this point you wouldn't be complaining about the TSA or baggage handlers stealing stuff from your bags, you would instead be complaining about people breaking into your house at regular intervals and stealing your car?  But I suppose we should cut and run from the drug war just as from Iraq?  Do you really believe the results would be any different?  You like the Democrats love to claim things would go better your way because you mistakenly believe people left to there own devices would not impose themselves on you.  News flash, when people who make poor choices are unrestrained or unopposed, their poor choices will continue regardless of the consequences to anyone, and will eventually affect you.  Claiming we should just give up on drugs because we haven't eradicated it's use is like claiming we should just fire all the policemen because after 200+ years on the job, they haven't eradicated crime. 

Complaining about the TSA not preventing theft or participating in theft is no different, without any attempt at security, even a clumsy attempt as they are doing now, 911 will occur again repeatedly just as the calendar date (September 11) comes back year after year.  The fact it hasn't is due to the clumsy efforts of the TSA, so 911 has not reoccurred.  This is not to say it won't ever, however, at least someone is trying instead of giving in and throwing up their hands.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

You're right. Both wars are

You're right. Both wars are going SO well, and SO cheaply for the taxpayers. And clearly, those of us who want 0 law enforcement resources to be spent on the failed drugwar so that resources can be concentrated on crimes with actual victims are actually plotting secretly to make home burglary legal, not abusing your own body. Just as those of us who think the private security market could do better on airports than a government that let 9/11 happen would do are actually plotting secretly to let the Islamofascists commit another 9/11, since clearly only fatcat government contractors like "Blackwater" are capable of providing private security services. Yeah, we're busted completely by your brilliance, super-tweak... Peaceful people should never be left to their own devices (ie "alone"). Excellent job.
JMR

psssst..getcha carbon offsets

psssst..getcha carbon offsets...real cheap man.

My cousin knows somebody that knows these poor people. Poor people never go on vacation,fly in planes or drive suv's. They will sell you 10 years of carbon real cheap. This should cover your summer rental in the Hamptons this season.
You can even bury all those burnt out florescent light bulbs in their backyard...you know the toxic energy savers with the mercury in them.

Maybe the enviro-kook do-good

Maybe the enviro-kook do-gooders can scrounge up enough loose change to purchase sufficient carbon offsets from the soon to be Dr. Gore to have a guilt-free flight over and back.

The hypocracy fo these people is beyond transparrent and reaching the point of being comical.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Speaking of comical Warmists

Speaking of the comical Warmists and their carbon offsets, we haven't heard from Chumley since I laughed at him for insisting that his job as a hazmat janitor exempted him from aggressively reducing his own carbon footprint.   ;^>

"Did we think Kyoto would [reduce global warming] when we signed it? . . . Hell no!" -Al Gore

RJ,LOL-I remember that. I sho

RJ,

LOL-I remember that. I should have told him that I spent five years ('89-94) working for a large environmental engineering and consulting firm, where I busied myself with overseeing the cleanup and replacement of leaking under-ground petroleum and waste-oil storage tanks all over the southeastern United States.

I probably did more for the environment in real terms during that time than Chumley and a whole busload of Dr. Gores will do for it in a lifetime.

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

Flying around in private jets

Flying around in private jets is the least of their environmental offenses.  One look at the houses they live in explains why America has problem with energy independence.  The Celebs and people like Al Gore have huge houses, multiple houses, consuming large amounts of electricity and natural gas.  Their consumption of energy is so huge as to be obscene to the average American and that's saying something.  Simply buying so called carbon credits or performing a concert for the benefit of the environment but not living up to the standards they insist the rest of us should do so is beyond hypocrisy, I will coin a new word "hyperpocrisy".

Now I don't have a problem with rich people per say, they are entitled to spend "their" money anyway they please, however, they have no business telling me how I should spend "mine".  Martin Sheen before the EU Parliment, recently repeated the comment that Americans are consuming the earth with their consumerism.  Well Martin, what kind of house do you live in?  What's your electric bill?

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

I'd like to make a plea to my

I'd like to make a plea to my celebrity friends....
Is it necessary to have 22 bathrooms in a 10 bedroom home?
Please in the future keep a one to one ratio.

Remember if it's yellow be mellow, but if it's brown flush it down.

Thank you
(pssst I have some carbon offsets for sale)

I saw this story the other da

I saw this story the other day.  I read all of the comments and even added my own comment.  They never showed my comment (nothing abusive at all), but they have deleted other comments and kept the long one at the end from some guy named George who didn't seem to comprehend what the article said or he didn't read it at all.  Which pretty much defines him as liberal.

I heard all the rock stars ar

I heard all the rock stars are going to purchase global warming credits from Al Gore. Every starving black child in Africa will agree to kill three extra flies swarming around their heads.This will certainly cover the energy used by the elites.

Ah yes, there's nothing so

Ah yes, there's nothing so fine as being lectured at by a bunch of rich, narcissistic drug-addled degenerate rock 'n' rollers. 

Not that there's anything wrong with that, per se.

And I for one, can't wait to hear famed climate expert Sir Elton John tell us about his sacrifice in turning off the AC for one minute a day in ALL his six luxury 100,000 feet mansions!

Good old queenie... leading by example as always.

"This is the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel,"

Rosie O'Donnell, Ph.Dumbass, Emeritus Professor of Stupid Wimmn's Studies, Clown University.