The April 11 edition of "The View" again discussed Don Imus’s recent racist and sexist remarks about the Rutgers women’s basketball team. Rosie O’Donnell likewise continued her tirade about Imus’ alleged "free speech." In a statement too bizarre even for Joy Behar, Rosie said the next step is the "thought police" locking everyone up in Guantanamo Bay without a lawyer. Perhaps Rosie is feeling the heat after her own controversial remarks.
JAMIE-LYNN SIGLER: I think people who have a public voice just need to be conscious then of what they’re saying and the effect that it can have and understand that there’s going to be consequences if they say things like that.
O’DONNELL: Right, you just worry if the consequences, you know --
BEHAR: Because you could be next.
O’DONNELL: -impede upon- which is all right. If that happens, it happens. But the point of the story is, if it impedes on free speech in America, democracy is at stake. Because democracy is based on freedom of speech and freedom of the press. So we really have to worry about that in this country.
[Applause]
HASSELBECK: And we should be concerned and responsible with our freedom too.
O’DONNELL: Right, but it’s not a freedom if you outlaw certain words or thoughts, because then the thought police come and then before you know it, everyone’s in Guantanamo Bay without representation.
HASSELBECK: That would be impossible to enforce.
BEHAR: What a jump!
Earlier in the segment, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, and surprisingly, Joy Behar commented on the lack of moral authority Imus’ harshest critics, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton possess.
JOY BEHAR: There’s also something about casting the stone, when you-- everybody else is so innocent? You know
ELISABETH HASSELBECK: Yeah look at Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. I mean they, they’ve been quoted-
BEHAR: Jesse Jackson, don't you remember his "hymietown" remarks?
HASSELBECK: Yes
ROSIE O’DONNELL: Yeah
BEHAR: That, you know, he’s not innocent either on this topic. So, you know, let’s not be so hypocritical about all this.
HASSELBECK: And where does that stop? Where do you draw the line?
BEHAR: It was an obnoxious, racist remark, true, but it's all over the place.
—Justin McCarthy is a news analyst at Media Research Center.















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Anus is fired.
April 11, 2007 - 15:24 ET by sarcasmoBigelow Tea & the rest of a variety of Anus sponsors who finally jumped-ship today ALSO have a first amendment right to not-spend money on the Anus radio/TV show. Which means Anus gets to either go find even stupider ad spenders or he must "retire" and go away. My money's on "retire." Anus is fired. Money talks.
JMR
Hi sarc...I knew there was an
April 11, 2007 - 15:32 ET by bigtimerHi sarc...I knew there was another big one I couldn't hear last night, when I heard this morning it was Bigelow Tea I 'bout died laughing sipping my coffee!
I have alse heard his dealing with his ranch are starting to get looked into in more depth, I know Spitzer, whom I do not care for anyway was looking into the matter but it wasn't in NY where he had jurisdiction so I think more fall-out is to come ...going to be interesting to me because for years I thought what an obvious rip-off...but that is up to the fools that want to join the club...I remember when they were buying horses and cows and Imus would give them a name and report to them like Andrea Mitchell what they named the particular animal and they were just really soooo interested, I am being sarcastic to a point here.
I suspect he'll get away wi
April 11, 2007 - 15:37 ET by sarcasmoI suspect he'll get away with the ranch, which I suspect is in reality an Anus-tax-avoidance device instead of an actual charity. I'm just happy he's gonna be off the air, as that means CBS & MSNBC need to choose anyone-different. It'll be tough for them to do-worse, but I'm not putting forth any hiring suggestions publicly, for fear of jinxing 'em! :)
JMR
Ann Coulter needs a radio s
April 11, 2007 - 15:45 ET by MightyMouthAnn Coulter needs a radio show.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Coulter would be great, thei
April 11, 2007 - 15:57 ET by bigtimerCoulter would be great, their ratings would triple, but they can't have that, after-all they have an agenda and she doesn't fit it!
Seriously if they were smart they would try to have something balanced at least to try to rival Fox and Friends...I remember when Imus was #1 and he put the show down daily!
Look at him now....
LOL!
True bt, Ann would probably
April 11, 2007 - 16:06 ET by MightyMouthTrue bt, Ann would probably drop the "F" word too much (and I don't mean the good one) for NBC. Laura Ingram, who already has a radio show, would be good competion for Fox.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Hey MM, I think Coulter would
April 11, 2007 - 16:23 ET by bigtimerHey MM,
I think Coulter would do just fine as long as they had somebody like bimbo Craig Crawford on and say a Pat Buchanan as the middle guy....lol!
Laura too, they could rotate or something with others like Fox does, they would have good ratings at least...but they have an agenda...all leftists all the time.
Fools!
Speaking of rotating "
April 11, 2007 - 16:34 ET by MightyMouthSpeaking of rotating "talent". The few times I have seen Imus, it seemed he was just as much a fixture as the chair he was in.
I could only stand to watch for a few minutes before starting to doze off. He seemed like an old guy in a cowboy hat, with a bad case of the "mumbles".
Heck, NBC could probably get me to take his place and get better ratings! I think I have a few gags left in me. :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM...By the way you post nobo
April 11, 2007 - 16:41 ET by bigtimerMM...
By the way you post nobody and I mean nobody would be falling asleep...
Laughter is the best medicine!
You'd do great...go for it!
*bowing head, kicking pebbl
April 11, 2007 - 16:45 ET by MightyMouth*bowing head, kicking pebbles*
Awww, geee, tanks bt!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM...You are WELCOME!Okay...Q
April 11, 2007 - 16:50 ET by bigtimerMM...
You are WELCOME!
Okay...Quit now, I am laughing out loud so hard I am scaring the deer out of the yard, away from my tulips that are just starting to come up!
Thanks!
I mean that, they are lucky I didn't get out the gun!
They are thanking you too....
otay. "There are two
April 11, 2007 - 16:54 ET by MightyMouthotay.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
You 2 are right. Ann C. wou
April 12, 2007 - 03:59 ET by sarcasmoYou 2 are right. Ann C. would probably get better ratings her first week than Walter Williams. But I still think Walter as a replacement would be better for conservatives -- and for MSNBC if they want to effectively compete with Fox News. Plenty of shouting is already done on TV, what the audience might want for a change is a voice of intelligent reason. In fact, Walter Williams replacing Anus might even be good for America IMO, and not just conservatives.
JMR
Oh, what the hell? I'll scr
April 11, 2007 - 16:05 ET by sarcasmoOh, what the hell? I'll screw his chances up entirely & say it. Walter Williams, with Cathy Young as a sidekick instead of that Bernard asskisser. Now THAT political combo would make me turn-off Howard Stern & somehow deal with the immense commercial-load of MSNBC in the morning.
JMR -- who senses the cloak, when it comes to MSNBC if not NB...
I don't know about that sarc,
April 11, 2007 - 15:54 ET by bigtimerI don't know about that sarc, I heard an interesting segment on Fox this morning from a guy on the internet that said even though he is using charity status for all of this, his money he takes in to what he supposedly pays out when it comes to taking in about 100 kids a year for a couple weeks at a time is very questionable....
We shall see...you can be sure they are digging...this is the blogs now, I tried to remember the exact site and the correct name, I was busy and couldn't copy it down at the time, tried to find it on the internet with no luck, but you can bet people are really searching now....I just can't help but laugh....can't help it!
I am going to look in a couple other places later too...may come up with it....lol!
You may be right, BT. I'm n
April 11, 2007 - 16:09 ET by sarcasmoYou may be right, BT. I'm not very good at avoiding any taxes, I can tell you that for sure this time of year, so I'm certainly no authority on this subject!
JMR
Here is a repost of the Vie
April 11, 2007 - 18:39 ET by FairlightHere is a repost of the View Sponsor List:
Nice job fairlight. I sat dow
April 11, 2007 - 22:48 ET by USA4freedomNice job fairlight. I sat down and e-mailed them all!!
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc.
Ronald Reagn- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Rosie -- you're right
April 11, 2007 - 21:46 ET by thepretendpunditRosie -- you're right. Now, welcome to the world that you and other liberals created.
Man, I had never even heard o
April 11, 2007 - 15:58 ET by Roger the ShrubberMan, I had never even heard of Bigelow Tea before today. Here, it is the #2 tea company in the US, having 10% of the market, almost $70 million in sales in 2006. Interesting.
Here is a link to some numbers. The print window opens after this page loads, so be forewarned, and cancel out!
Yeah Rog,Imus has been sponso
April 11, 2007 - 16:17 ET by bigtimerYeah Rog,
Imus has been sponsoring the Bigelow Tea company for years now, he used to have them on a lot at least once or twice a year, they would donate to his charities BIG Time!
I don't know if you have ever heard of Constant Comet I think it is, but it is delicious and has been around since I have been a little girl, man I wished they had some around here in my area, just thinking about the aroma and smell, let alone the taste of it makes me want a cup!
Just thought I would throw that in!
Rosie -- you're right
April 11, 2007 - 21:45 ET by thepretendpunditRosie -- you're right. Now, welcome to the world that you and other liberals created.
What Behar joined in with Has
April 11, 2007 - 15:26 ET by bigtimerWhat Behar joined in with Hasselbeck?
....somethings happening here...
LOL!
...what's happening? How abou
April 11, 2007 - 17:09 ET by TruthMonger...what's happening? How about Rosie-who-never-lets-anyone-else-talk-O'Donnell is suddenly concerned about free speech? Not hardly...
Oh man truthmonger that was an 8 penny with one swing
April 11, 2007 - 23:24 ET by SportPoliticsOh man truthmonger that was an 8 penny with one swing.
Gargancho-mouth Rotsie while interrupting and speaking over her : " Elisabeth, you can't just expect to give your opinion.." (here on NB several days ago w/vid link)
Jamie-Lynn you can say whatev
April 11, 2007 - 15:31 ET by ratso ferrariJamie-Lynn you can say whatever you want because your daddy is Tony Soprano! Oh fugettaboutit.
Here's a clue Rosie
April 11, 2007 - 15:33 ET by Cool ArrowMoney = Speech
I'm Tellin' ya
Imus, Sharpton and Jackson are all three gone. When the Slanted view is emboldened to say the same things we are saying, we can read the words together
Mene, Tekel, Upharsin
One out of three aint bad R
April 11, 2007 - 15:39 ET by MightyMouthOne out of three aint bad Riled. :-)
There will plenty of "racebaiting" for Jackson and Sharpton in the future. IMO.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
All the hub-bub surrounding I
April 11, 2007 - 16:20 ET by GalvanicAll the hub-bub surrounding Imus and his racial comment, is just what Sharpton and Jackson thrive on, and it comes at an opportune time for them.
The corporate sponsors pulling out of Imus's show are avoiding the blood splatter from the Sharpton/Jackson public stoning, and those two are flexing their muscle in front of the Democratic candidates to demonstrate that they are still relevent and influential. It has very little to do about Imus himself at this point; he's just the roadkill. The national discussion will move on to racism in America, and the usual cast of characters will harangue the public about racism in America being worse now than it was in the Fifties, and Pelosi and Reid will pass some sort of Congressional resolution, and maybe then . . . maybe .. we can all return to normal.
You forgot something Galvanic
April 11, 2007 - 23:35 ET by SportPoliticsYou forgot something Galvanic. They have to work in " this is Bush's fault."
It will of course be slipped in that because the "Divider" has the whole world on edge, those who normally wouldn't be so rude are, and the rest are upset and divisive so this has been more a problem since the 'ol white boys league stole the election of 2000 to start the Iraq war, and has especially ruined 40 years of progress when Bush turned his back on blacks harmed by Katrina, just ask Kayne West.
"Stewpot" comes to mind
April 11, 2007 - 15:47 ET by Cool ArrowNBC CBS and General Electric will not soon forget. If there is an opportunity to marginalize the Retro Reverands, it will be siezed upon
One can only hope, I for on
April 11, 2007 - 15:50 ET by MightyMouthOne can only hope, I for one, have seen enough of these swindlers.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Ho's on the Hardwood!
April 11, 2007 - 15:46 ET by linkeroneThe NBC Nightly News has now succeeded in accomplishing true Tabloid TV Status.. I have seen recently, product placement, advertising reported as news, more advertising reported as news.... And now almost a full 10 minutes about the ho's on the hardwood! Give me a break, nothing deserves that kind on press! Back to PBS
Linkerone, what do you mean t
April 11, 2007 - 22:10 ET by MikeBLinkerone, what do you mean that "nothing deserves that kind of press"? D*mn it, they pre-empted coverage of the continued death of Anna Nicole Smith. How could they stop covering that story for this? Don't they know that without continued flogging of the Anna Nicole horse that this country may very well slide into a cultural abyss we may never recover from? Oh, never mind.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
First of all, this whole Imus
April 11, 2007 - 16:16 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveFirst of all, this whole Imus thing has been blown way out of proportion. It was wrong for him to be brash and disrespectful in a public forum. But rap and R&B artists regularly use the same type (and worse) language and they have a much larger audience. Imus ran awry for saying those things in the wrong forum.
Censorship. Ha!
As an employee or representative of a company or organization, there are certain things you cannot say and then still expect to keep your position with the company or organization or to not expect some sort of reprimand.
Why is it so hard for ROD to understand that freedom of speech is the freedom to express political beliefs or criticisms without government reprisal? Companies, organizations, and even private individuals can set speech limits within their own jurisdictions. For example: If someone says the F-word in my home, they will be escorted off of my property (if they don't leave when asked to). Is that stifling their 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech? No, it isn't. They can say the F-word as much as they feel like saying it, they just aren't going to say it in my home.
Should Imus be able to say what he wants to? As a representative of a broadcasting station, he needs to keep in mind that the station's interests and ultimately his bottom line depends on him not crossing certain lines. ROD would be wise to keep that in mind also.
"I'd rather be bald than to pretend that I'm not!" --Mean Gene Dr. Love on comb-overs.
Imus ran awry for saying thos
April 11, 2007 - 17:00 ET by NoMoreClintonsImus ran awry for saying those things in the wrong forum.
Not the wrong forum . . . but because he is the wrong color - WHITE.
What free speech? The first
April 11, 2007 - 16:27 ET by MudhenWhat free speech? The first amendment doesn't apply to employee-employer relationships in cases like this.
Imus works for GE. GE can tell Imus what he can or cannot say any day and its perfectly legal. What exactly does she think corporate EEO policies are? They tell GE's employee's what they cannot say or do, which is just what Imus violated. I think he should be treated just like any other person who violated their corporate EEO policy. In a big company like GE these issues come up regularly, so it wouldn't be the first time they've ever disciplined anyone for making improper remarks. If some senior-level manager was turned in for making a similar comment, how would GE handle it? Treat Imus the same way and it would be fair.
If I was a Disney/ABC employee I'd turn Rosie in for some of the comments she's made as a apparant violation of their EEO policy. It would be interesting to see how it would be handled.
Imus says things like this
April 11, 2007 - 16:38 ET by c5thenImus says things like this all the time. This one maybe more onerous than some others, but it's not out of character.
The Free speech that Rosie is so worried about , now, is between the government and it's citizens, not between employer and employee. It also doesn't protect a person from the consequenses of their free speach.
Why is it that liberals always seem to get free speech and free consequenses confused when it's another liberal that is in the soup. In the case of conservatives, they just think that all conservative thoughts should be banned.
The problem is that Rosie doe
April 11, 2007 - 16:44 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveThe problem is that Rosie doesn't seem to be able to tell the difference between relationships of employer and employee and of the government and citizens. It's all the same to her, which is disturbing display of ignorance or stupidity.
"I'd rather be bald than to pretend that I'm not!" --Mean Gene Dr. Love on comb-overs.
Dr. Love...Rosie has no clue
April 11, 2007 - 17:15 ET by Clear thinkerDr. Love...
Rosie has no clue about the real world.
I once had an employee wear a t-shirt to work that stated "F*** Censorship". When he was asked to turn the shirt inside out or go home and change, he stated that he was going to sue us for violating his free speech rights. I then had my head of HR give him the phone number to our corporate attorney. He actually called our attorney and it took the attorney about 2 minutes to explain that democracy pretty much stops after he clocked in. Never heard from him again.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Ct...LOL!Nipped that right in
April 11, 2007 - 17:19 ET by bigtimerCt...
LOL!
Nipped that right in the rear fast!
Good riddance!
Poof!
bt...Yeah but... I'm betting
April 11, 2007 - 17:22 ET by Clear thinkerbt...
Yeah but... I'm betting he still swears we were in the wrong.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Wonder what Rosie O. would sa
April 11, 2007 - 16:51 ET by SnowWhiteWonder what Rosie O. would say if Imus had called the team members a bunch of 'dykes'? Maybe she'd find out SHE'S the Nazi. Would love to see Rosie O. and Ann Coulter duking it out. We know Rosie has the biggest mouth, but does she have the biggest testies? I picture Rosie slinking away from it ,whimpering, with her tail (I bet she has one) between her legs. That would be so much fun to see!
What? Rosie's a dyke?Guess th
April 11, 2007 - 17:12 ET by Cool ArrowWhat? Rosie's a dyke?
Guess that explains why her wife looks like a Little Dutch Boy.
Little Dutch Boy...Perfect!LM
April 11, 2007 - 17:17 ET by bigtimerLittle Dutch Boy...
Perfect!
LMAO!
Just a tongue-in-cheek remark
April 11, 2007 - 17:39 ET by Cool ArrowBingo, SW. I'd love to see
April 11, 2007 - 18:06 ET by QueenMumBingo, SW. I'd love to see someone go after Rosie's sexuality in an offensive manner and see how tolerant she is. Free speech! Free speech! Ha.
QueenMum....Yes, Rosie
April 11, 2007 - 19:54 ET by SnowWhiteQueenMum....Yes, Rosie never ceases to reveal what a one-sided, left-wing hypocrite she is.
Rosie...Shut up and eat!The l
April 11, 2007 - 17:09 ET by Clear thinkerRosie...
Shut up and eat!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Little Dutch Boy....That's hi
April 11, 2007 - 19:00 ET by SnowWhiteLittle Dutch Boy....That's hilarious! How about Rosie doubling as a windmill? She's already a big bag o' hot air.
We should run with this stun
April 11, 2007 - 19:15 ET byWe should run with this stunt of Rosie's.
I would love Rosie's comments on the following:
Obama just showed what he is really about. It was on ABC's evening news. Obama said that Imus should be fired.
Debra...
White Man's Guilt
April 11, 2007 - 19:38 ET by Cool ArrowObviously Obama suffers from the shame of knowing his ancestors owned slaves.
Seriously, Riled One...He ha
April 11, 2007 - 22:38 ET bySeriously, Riled One...He has got to be kidding... Talk about 'riding the fence.' wow...
Debra,Don't worry Obama's n
April 11, 2007 - 19:39 ET by MightyMouthDebra,
Don't worry Obama's not "black enough" to be taken seriously on an issue like this. :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM,Maybe this is his attempt
April 11, 2007 - 22:40 ET byMM,
Maybe this is his attempt to be seen as such?
Debbie...
The best chance the dems ha
April 11, 2007 - 22:45 ET by MightyMouthThe best chance the dems have is a Hillary- Obama. Ticket. Having said that I weep for America if that comes to fruition.(if they win) if not, LMAO! Diebold save US!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Man MM...do not bring up Dieb
April 11, 2007 - 22:58 ET by bigtimerMan MM...do not bring up Diebold...the dems had lawsuits ready if they didn't win,heard about it for a yer ad nauseum everywhere for a year in all media venues... of course that didn't count for their dead and triplicate voters everywhere..because the republicans didn't challenge them, and where they did the Att. Generals in those states looked the other way...why some were even fired for not doing their job..and look at the outcome of that now!
hehe, bt I used to work for
April 11, 2007 - 23:05 ET by MightyMouthhehe, bt I used to work for Diebold! (before voting machines though) But I would be glad to give my expertise to Carl Rove for the next Republican presidental victory. Whatever it takes! After all the end justifies the means in American Politics, right?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM...LMAO!Vote Early...Vote O
April 11, 2007 - 23:16 ET by bigtimerMM...
LMAO!
Vote Early...Vote Often...on Diebold!
Spread your expertise MM...far and wide...spread it everywhere!
Bood Sport is right...whatever it takes!
Imus
April 11, 2007 - 19:29 ET by pbthinkerIt's interesting to see the sponsors that have baled out on Imus. One of them is Proctor and Gamble, who also has many products advertised on "The View" I guess it's OK to slander the United States, the Republican Party, and the President of the U.S., but not say something stupid about basketball players.
What Imus did was stupid and insulting and he deserves everything he gets, however, what Rosie said was stupid and insulting, not just to a girls basketball team but to the whole country. It just goes to show where priorities are.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Okay Rose bud (dude), when ar
April 11, 2007 - 21:16 ET by Airforce_5_OOkay Rose bud (dude), when are you will you get the difference between “freedom of speech” and speaking freely. The Constitution of this United States gives you the right not to have your speech silenced by the Government. You are responsible to those who employ you and to the public you make your statements too. If you get you’re a** fired for your statements you should learn two valuable lessons.
Reduce the U.S. Carbon Footprint. Send Rosie to Iran. Airforce_5_O 04/04/2007
Recent News
April 11, 2007 - 22:00 ET by jrock81Hey, this post made the Drudge Report...WTG.
I agree with Rosie, on this, and likely this alone. I'm sure women have been called worse things and by better people, but because they are jumping on this very public figure, the end result is that there will be very little that can be said that isn't offensive to someone. The culture of apology that everyone seems to adhere to is disgraceful, and public discourse is threatened by this. You should be able to voice your opinions openly. Sure, you may not have sponsors, but there is no clause in the constitution that says others should pay for your pursuit of happiness.
Ann Coulter had the best ta
April 12, 2007 - 07:39 ET by Jack BauerAnn Coulter had the best take on this on Hannity & Colmes, and even Colmes accepted it with good grace..
Paraphrasing , Ann said the students were not "fair game," unlike politicians because they hadn't put themselves in the public eye except by their achievements..
That Imus was gratuitously insulting and wrong, as all they did was represent themselves well, he should apologise and move on.
I, too, saw Coulter on H&
April 12, 2007 - 08:48 ET by GalvanicI, too, saw Coulter on H&C and listended to her very clear and logical explanation. I think it's the best one I've heard so far.
I couldn't care less about Do
April 12, 2007 - 00:21 ET by kirstennjI couldn't care less about Don Imus but the people who think his career is over are wrong. All it will take is for Brad and Angelina to adopt an orphan from Zimbabwe or for Britney and some guy that should be working at McDonald's to get matching tattoos and this country of reality tv watchers that think this is hard hitting news will forget about it. Al Sharpton is going to make as much money from it as possible and he will find a new "outrage" that he has to address. Maybe he and Jesse can grab Tawana Brawley and go down to "Hymietown" and find some new racism to jump on. In a month Imus will still be on the air and I would be willing to wager that because of all this uproar over what a boring shockjock said that he will probably have a larger audience than ever.
Kill Switch
April 12, 2007 - 07:27 ET by Cool ArrowAnybody want to bet broadcasters demand a 10 second kill switch on all shockjock programs?
Imus Firing
April 12, 2007 - 07:28 ET by olesparkieWell, at least he doesn't have to waste time meeting with the basketball team to grovel some more. Did I say 'team'? I meant to say....what were those words '50 cent' uses? Anyway. Imus got away with being 'anti-Catholic' for years. His 'Cardinal O'Malley' (or O'Hara or whatever) bit was way more offensive. But I guess the thought police thinks it's okay to slam Catholics. Imus needed to be put out to pasture a long time ago.
Rosie O'dummy
April 12, 2007 - 09:31 ET by Mr. TerryHere's her side of it: O’DONNELL: Right, but it’s not a freedom if you outlaw certain words or thoughts, because then the thought police come and then before you know it, everyone’s in Guantanamo Bay without representation.
She didn't listen to Siglar about "consequences". Rosie, you are allowed to say whatever your big mouth desires, but you could lose your job just like Imus just did. And, he didn't get sent to Gitmo! He just lost his income.
You can't just blab, blab, blab and yell "free speech, free speech" without consequences, thinking that if you get an opposing thought or worse yet, fired, and think you're being persecuted. You're allowed to offend people but free speech does not mean that you will have no consequences. If you offend people they will offend you right back.
Google this...
Sharpton and Jackson are both
April 12, 2007 - 11:47 ET by daveinbocaSharpton and Jackson are both fraudulent imposters shaking down the man for fiascos like Tawana Brawley [remember her?] and the Duke "rape" accusations.
But media hypocrisy is craven and cowardly. Aside from yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, speech should be free, even if it's on-air, as long as there is not malicious intent. Imus's comment was more just an over the top aside rather than a racist rant by that ex-Seinfeld nobody.
While I expect to receive m
April 17, 2007 - 11:51 ET by DyneWhile I expect to receive multiple flames for this, Rosie does have a point because elements of 1984 have been steadily infiltrating our society for years. Look at any issue that liberals defend: they're willing to listen, as long as you agree with them. The proposed "hate crime" bill defending homosexuals from being told their actions are an abomination, according to the Bible, is another example. There's also the whole global warming issue, the people who look at scientific evidence vs. being told what's going on by Al Gore and choosing to listen to his hot air. I've also got some news for you people, there's also plenty of scientific evidence that debunks the official 9/11 report, especially regarding the attack on the Pentagon. I'll let my signature be my final statement.
You don't have to believe conspiracy theories, but it doesn't hurt to at least investigate them. Why? Because the wicked conspire all the time.