ABC, CBS and NBC led Tuesday night with two stories each about the Don Imus racist-insult controversy, but only the CBS Evening News exploited Imus's “nappy-headed ho's” racial insult, directed at the Rutgers University womens' basketball team, as an opportunity to portray all African-Americans as economic “victims” of an unfair U.S. society. Reporter Richard Schlesinger highlighted Democratic U.S. Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick of Detroit: “We're always the last hired, the first fired. We're always the one, we have the highest crime, the worst schools. It's unfortunate in the richest nation in the world, but those are the facts of reality.” Schlesinger elaborated, over matching graphics: “Here's part of what Congresswoman Kilpatrick is talking about. The latest Census figures show the median income for African-American households is almost $20,000 less than white households. Whites are about twice as likely than blacks to get a college degree, and the Justice Department says blacks are five times more likely than whites to go to jail.”
Later in his piece framed around victimology, as if African-Americans have no control over their destiny, Schlesinger showcased Susan Taylor of Essence magazine who, Schlesinger explained, contends that “to describe black women in Imus' terms...ignores generations of suffering that has been left to African-Americans today.” Taylor used the Imus incident to bring up slavery: “If you think about black women being auctioned off on an auction block naked, standing before the crowds, bidding on them, all that is race memory.”
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video to provide this transcript of the April 10 CBS Evening News story:
Anchor Katie Couric: "Don Imus is a big money maker, bringing in hundreds of millions of advertising dollars every year with his radio show. And as financially appealing as he may be, he has a history of hurling insults at people because of their ethnicity, race, or sexual orientation. But he has never had to face this kind of reaction. We continue with Richard Schlesinger."
Richard Schlesinger: "The Rutgers players now find themselves part of history, but not the part they probably wanted -- not as victors but as victims of what a chorus of millions considers the latest display of racism."
Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-MI): "We're always the last hired, the first fired. We're always the one, we have the highest crime, the worst schools. It's unfortunate in the richest nation in the world, but those are the facts of reality."
Schlesinger: "Here's part of what Congresswoman Kilpatrick is talking about. The latest Census figures show the median income for African-American households is almost $20,000 less than white households. Whites are about twice as likely than blacks to get a college degree, and the Justice Department says blacks are five times more likely than whites to go to jail."
Kilpatrick: "Are we sensitive? You bet we are. We want good schools. We want opportunities and access to cash. We want advertising to depict who we really are."
Schlesinger: "Observers, both white and black, think Imus' comment was especially stinging because of its timing, when young players should have been celebrating an extraordinary season."
Sally Jenkins, Washington Post columnist: "They were great kids, knocking down great shots all over the the court, and it just was the furthest thing from anybody's mind."
Schlesinger: "Well, not from anybody's mind."
Jenkins: "Well, not from anybody's mind, but-"
Schlesinger: "Sally Jenkins is a sports columnist for the Washington Post."
Jenkins: "You imagine in sports that the winner's circle is genderless and colorless, and they got disabused of that notion rather abruptly."
Schlesinger: "And the insult was taken personally by more people than just the members of the basketball team."
Jenkins: "I think it was more than racist and sexist. It really, it really touched a nerve."
Schlesinger: "Susan Taylor is the editorial director of Essence magazine."
Susan Taylor, Essence magazine: "If you think about black women being auctioned off on an auction block naked, standing before the crowds, bidding on them, all that is race memory."
Schlesinger, over black and white video of hoses being used on blacks, presumably in the 1960s in the South: "And to describe black women in Imus' terms, says Taylor, ignores generations of suffering that has been left to African-Americans today."
Taylor: "There's really a lot of ignorance about our history and our culture, and certainly our feelings."
Essence Carson, Rutgers University basketball team member: "There's no more hurt than being hurt in a public eye in front of millions of viewers, listeners, and even readers."
Schlesinger: "So if Imus does meet with the Rutgers players, there could well be a curious role reversal. Young women in their teens and early 20s could hold to account a man in his 60s, and those ten students could well become teachers."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





Richard Schlesinger: "The Rutgers players now find themselves part of history, but not the part they probably wanted -- not as victors but as victims of what a chorus of millions considers the latest display of racism."
Susan Taylor, Essence magazine: "If you think about black women being auctioned off on an auction block naked, standing before the crowds, bidding on them, all that is race memory."














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Black Victimization?
April 11, 2007 - 07:26 ET by pocomocoI think it’s about time that we whites come out of the closet and admit, yes, blacks are like children, and that they are incapable of creating a life of their own.
The Democrats, over the last 40 years, have given them every opportunity to do so by putting them on welfare, providing them with ghetto housing, breaking up their families so that can receive bigger welfare checks, sending them to ghetto schools, allowing them to dropout early so that they can stand on corners listening to gangsta rap, all while avoiding drive-by shootings.
Didn’t the blacks realize, at the time, that the Democrats created a virtual paradise for them? But obviously, they were incapable of understanding it.
One of the terrible sadnessess(?) in all of this is that the MSM have played a major role in this tragedy by conning blacks into voting Democrat, which only put them in deeper.
But, the situation has changed for blacks, because Republican administrations have since removed much of the hoops blacks have had to jump through during past Democrat administrations.
Unfortunately, though, now that blacks are actually making progress through their own initiative, the so-called black leaders are still trying to hold them back by insisting they continue to live in the past, and reminding them they are still victims.
Fortunately, and to their credit, many blacks are no longer buying the leadership’s Step and Fetch-it victimization rap, and are becoming entrepreneurs and, in some cases, multi-millionaires.
Finally, for the past 40 years, the Democrats have ‘used’ blacks to gain and retain office, promising them a chicken in every pots. But, to their chagrin, the chicken never arrives. “Well, maybe next election”, they say.
So, with all the negative history toward blacks the Democrats have projected on them over the past 40 years, it is inconceivable to me why they are still voting for them.
A LITTLE WHITE HISTORY:
In 1863, Republican President, Lincoln, signed the Emancipation Proclamation freeing your slave ancestors. The Democrats opposed it.
In 1964, Republicans passed the Civil Right Act outlawing discrimination based on race. The Democrats opposed it.
During the Republican Reagan administration, welfare reform was passed eliminating much of the Democrat programs that kept blacks from achieving their dreams. The Democrats opposed it.
Imus shot his mouth off, and
April 11, 2007 - 07:42 ET by GalvanicImus shot his mouth off, and he'll probably pay the price through his pocketbook. I'm not going to defend this old man; for years he's gone out of his way to offend people for laughs, and this one is biting him back, and hard.
But this event spotlights the hypocrisy and double-standards in the PC environment we currently suffer. Imus goes to -- of all people -- Al Sharpton in order to make amends. And here we have the editor of Essence magazine asserting that his slur evokes images of enslaved women stripped and standing on blocks to be sold --- these images being stirred from "racial memory" (sounds like something the Nazis would've invented).
But rappers like Ludicrous earn tens of millions of dollars and win Grammies for lyrics using the same words and worse. Where is Ms. Taylor and Essence magazine on that?
Racism and sexism are ugly regardless of who practices them. I think most Americans prefer to see the standards apply equally.
What must the likes of Condi
April 11, 2007 - 07:50 ET by ChasvsWhat must the likes of Condi Rice, Thomas Sowell, Michael Steele, Colin Powell think when they see their "Race" used so awfully by the Democrats?
I'm surprised no one has sued to get the White House renamed so it wasn't such a Racist reminder of the past! You know, the past where the REPUBLICANS freed the slaves, pushed through the Equal Rights Amendment and broke the strangle hold of Welfare!
50+ years of Black support fo
April 11, 2007 - 11:04 ET by mattm50+ years of Black support for the Democrats and Blacks are not much better off than they were in 1950... Time to get off the plantation. (Not that I'm accepting the premise - obviously the stats are skewed)