NY Times Defends Pelosi from Presidential 'Assault' over Syrian Trip

  • Bookmark and Share

New York Times reporters Helene Cooper and Carl Hulse's Saturday "Washington Memo" -- "As One Syria Trip Draws Fire, Others Draw Silence" -- defended House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's controversial trip to Syria with familiar Democratic talking points.

"With a final stop in Lisbon on Friday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi headed home to a Washington that is still ringing with complaints from senior Bush officials that her stop in Damascus to visit with Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, bolstered the image of Syria at a time when United States policy is to isolate it.

"The tone of the complaints -- particularly Vice President Dick Cheney’s public characterization of her visit as 'bad behavior' -- contrasts sharply with the administration's silence about a similar trip to Damascus a week ago by Republican lawmakers, Representatives Frank R. Wolf of Virginia, Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania and Robert B. Aderholt of Alabama.

"Nor was there much heard from the White House about a meeting that Representative Darrell Issa, a California Republican, had with Mr. Assad on Thursday, a day after Ms. Pelosi met with the Syrian president.

"Ms. Pelosi, in a telephone interview from Lisbon on Friday, said she could not account for the Bush administration’s assault, which she at one point equated to a tantrum. (She said her children were teasing her about Mr. Cheney’s accusation of bad behavior.) Defending her trip, Ms. Pelosi said that members of Congress had a responsibility to play a role in national security issues and that they needed to be able to gather information on their own, and not be dependent on the White House.

"'I am used to the administration; nothing surprises me,' she said. 'Having said that, I hope we can have the opportunity to convey to the president what we saw.'

The Times only briefly addressed Pelosi's misstatement that Israel was ready for peace talks with the terrorist state of Syria:

"Ms. Pelosi, as House speaker, outranks her other touring Congressional colleagues, and is the highest-ranking United States official to visit Damascus in years. Still, the criticism from Bush officials was sharp, particularly about Ms. Pelosi’s delivery of a message to Mr. Assad that Israel was ready for peace talks. The office of the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, later issued a statement saying that such talks could take place only if Syria stopped assisting terrorist groups."

Otherwise, the Times came well-armed with Democratic talking points:

"Democrats say the complaints have a certain political expediency to them, and note that many of the same people criticizing Ms. Pelosi’s decision to delve into foreign policy were fine when Newt Gingrich, then the Republican speaker of the House, made his own foray into foreign policy back in 1997.

"The Republican House leader, John A. Boehner of Ohio, criticized Ms. Pelosi’s trip, telling reporters that she was in Syria 'for one reason, and that is to embarrass the president.' In 1997, Mr. Boehner accompanied Mr. Gingrich to China, and called the trip 'very educational.'

"Ms. Pelosi, during the telephone interview, spoke at length about the value of the trip, the ecumenical makeup of the her delegation, the seriousness of their conversations with Middle Eastern leaders and the fact that most members of the delegation were steeped in these foreign policy issues. Ms. Pelosi also spoke of the Democrats’ determination to hold to the Bush administration line on issues they discussed."

Also on Saturday, the Times' lead editorial, "The Real Fumble in Damascus," expressed sympathy for Pelosi's plight (unlike a Washington Post editorial  from last Thursday, "Pratfall in Damascus," which featured strong criticism of the Speaker).

The Times editorialized:

"So long as Mr. Bush continues to shun high-level discussions with this troublesome but strategically located neighbor of Israel, Lebanon and Iraq, such Congressional visits can serve the useful purpose of spurring a much needed examination of the administration’s failed policies."

For more examples of New York Times bias, visit Times Watch.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wonderful, what else would

Wonderful, what else would one expect?

What remains under the covers here, firewalled to the American public, is the fact that the Afghan, Iran, and Iraq left support the US right.

Unfortunately I am unable to link to any supporting material.

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life

Leave it to the NYT to defend

Leave it to the NYT to defend the indefensible. Of cours they have no choice. They are the democratic communications letter of choice. They themselves border on treason, and the proof is their support of Pelosi. The woman is incompetent, to say the least. Her trip was just that, "a trip". Spoken of in a 60's sort of way. Her actions prove that she should be heald accountable and recalled. Her actions so far are disgraceful. And the NYT in this communication have proven, once again, that the Ole Gray Lady is herself, disgraceful.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

"I am used to the NY Tim

"I am used to the NY Times, nothing surprises me, but I cannot account for it's assault on President Bush"

Hello "basement", here comes the NYTimes stock price...!

At Times like these, it becomes more than just a Moral Obligation to express ones opinion, it becomes a Pleasure.

From Ha'aretz before Pelosi's

From Ha'aretz before Pelosi's meeting:

Following his visit to the forces in the field, a decision was made to publicly address the concerns of a possible deterioration with the Syrians, and to send a message that Israel has no intention of attacking Syria, nor is there any coordinated plan with the U.S. for a joint attack against Iran.

The speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, is scheduled to meet with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus today, and will deliver a message of calm from Israel.

"We hope the message will be understood," political sources in Israel said yesterday. "The question is whether Assad is looking for an excuse ... so that he can carry out an attack against Israel in the summer, or whether this is a mistaken assessment."

Its hard to believe that Ha'aretz misconsued the Israel's message before Pelosi even delivered.

Oh please. Ding, your such a

Oh please. Ding, your such a dunce. The fact that the Israelies had to correct Pelosi is not proof enough for you? That Pelosi admited she screwed it up isint enough? Your trying to hard and your head must hurt something fierce!

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

bass...There is never proof e

bass...

There is never proof enough when it comes to ding...what do you expect, he is a rabid loony leftist!

LOL!

bassndude -  the Israeli mes

bassndude -  the Israeli message was publicly announced before Pelosi even met with Assad - so the newspapers got it wrong, too?

Oh, it was in a NEWSPAPER. Th

Oh, it was in a NEWSPAPER. Then it MUST be true.

I think. Therefore I am -- NOT a lib***l.

ding, what about BNDs' second

ding, what about BNDs' second point you conveniently omitted addressing? I shall repost to ensure you do not miss it a second time;

 "That Pelosi admited she screwed it up isint enough?"

She had her own party dissing her for her actions too, do you only read liberal blogs and come on here to try and convience others of something other than the truth?

"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."

dingbat - what part of the Lo

dingbat - what part of the Logan Law don't you understand? She had no right to deliver that message in the first place without the approval of the President. The rest of it is moot.

ding - Nancy Peloti appointed

ding - Nancy Peloti appointed herself to deliver a message as a U.S. agent from the Israeli government without the authorization of the President. That is violation of The Logan Act and Article II of the Constitution. To compound the felony she was not intelligent enough to deliver the right message. End of discussion.

Gat New York - The State Depa

Gat New York - The State Department staff was in alll meetings that Pelosi had with foreign officials. What's State going to do - press charges against itself? 

Is that your excuse?? Anytime

Is that your excuse?? Anytime a member of Congress meets with a foreign dignitary they must be accompanied by State Department people in that country. So what?? She broke the law and it is a felony. She also showed how uttterly incompetent she is by botching a simple message. What's scary is that she is third in line.

Its hard to believe that Ha'a

Its hard to believe that Ha'aretz

No it's not. You shouldn't believe everything you read in left-wing rags.

I think. Therefore I am -- NOT a lib***l.

You answered your own questio

You answered your own question. The story you swallowed whole was B.S.

This is old news, Ding. You are about 3-4 days behind.

Try again another day.

Diaper media

I propose that the NY Times be declared the foremost example of the "diaper media", since their major function seems to be to cover Democrat butt.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

testing

speed?