Imagine for a moment that warmer-than-normal winter temperatures in Alaska were making it difficult for the endangered sea otter to find food, and making it easier for natural predators and illegal hunters to kill them.
Would the global warming alarmists in the media be all over this story as another example of how man-made “climate change” is destroying the planet and endangering species that are its inhabitants?
Well, as NewsBusters reported on April 5, it’s been pretty darned cold in Alaska this winter, so much so that the Anchorage Daily News reported Sunday that it’s wreaking havoc with the local sea otter population (emphasis added):
An extra-cold winter on the Alaska Peninsula has frozen sea otters out of the bay and pushed them onto the tundra near Port Heiden where they're easy prey for wolves, humans and hunger.
Some of the starving animals -- with ribs showing -- have waddled or belly-slid several miles inland, residents said. Others have been attacked by dogs near houses, killed by villagers for their hides, or died on sea ice where eagles and foxes pick at their remains.
[…]
Partially enclosed by spits of land, the bay hardened into a solid surface of ice this winter after a cold spell -- beginning in January and lasting through March -- dropped temperatures to zero and below, [village fire chief Mark Kosbruk] said.
Average winter temperatures usually hover in the 20s, producing only ice floes, he said. Spring temperatures have recently melted snow off tundra and opened cracks in the frozen bay miles from shore, but the sea otters are still coming on land.
Despite wire services such as UPI and AP covering this story, few media outlets have bothered to pick it up. As such, for argument’s sake, let’s reverse this report, and imagine how much attention it would have been given:
An extra-warm winter on the Alaska Peninsula has forced ice-loving sea otters out of the bay and pushed them onto the tundra near Port Heiden where they're easy prey for wolves, humans and hunger.
Some of the starving animals -- with ribs showing -- have waddled or belly-slid several miles inland, residents said. Others have been attacked by dogs near houses, killed by villagers for their hides, or died on sea ice where eagles and foxes pick at their remains.
[…]
Partially enclosed by spits of land, the bay thawed this winter after a hot spell -- beginning in January and lasting through March -- raising temperatures to 40 and above, [village fire chief Mark Kosbruk] said.
Average winter temperatures usually hover in the 20s, producing desirable ice floes, he said.
Think this would have drawn more attention from a media that disgracefully only report weather-related events which further anthropogenic global warming theories? Can't you see Meredith and Matt this morning going all gooey over these poor, unfortunate otters being destroyed by man's lust for SUV's and oil-profits? And, given the cold over the Eastern part of the nation, might this have been part of the lead story presented by Charles, Brian, and, of course, Katie this evening, complete with interviews from the locals?
Alas, to these folks, only species that are dying because of heat are relevant now.
What a disgrace.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Of course it will not be repo
April 9, 2007 - 13:36 ET by Gat New YorkOf course it will not be reported. Afterall the decision is in and the discussion is over. The art of selective science prohibits any input that counters their original hypothesis - which, of course, is now an absolute conclusion.
You could also spin it anot
April 9, 2007 - 13:42 ET by Dave in TexasYou could also spin it another way:
Global Warming Endangering Eagles And Foxes
"Anchorage, Alaska. Happy eagles and foxes are enjoying a bountiful feast of dead sea otters this April. However, if global warming changes the planet as expected, the frigid conditions that drove the sea otters to them in the first place could disappear, and the poor eagles and foxes would all starve."
So, am I ready for the New York Times yet?
Dave
April 9, 2007 - 13:46 ET by Noel SheppardDave,
Beautiful. Yes, you should expect a call from Pinch any moment now! ns
I am used to the media being
April 9, 2007 - 15:09 ET by contraryI am used to the media being disgraceful about the Global Warming debate. My local newspaper is even in rapture about the issue. Is it too much to ask for our media to do us the service of showing both sides of the debate and letting us decide which has more merit?
What happened to the poor sta
April 9, 2007 - 15:15 ET by GeorgeTWhat happened to the poor starving polar bears? Are they not starving anymore? When it comes to these otters, the media could care less. And what happened to all of the arctic ice melting? Nature just isn't cooperating.
Remember; always obey High Lord God-King Al Gore. For His Word is law and must never be questioned.
First there are not enough ba
April 9, 2007 - 15:23 ET by Airforce_5_OFirst there are not enough baby seals to club and now this! Well my spring is shot.
Reduce the U.S. Carbon Footprint. Send Rosie to Iran. Airforce_5_O 04/04/2007
Where are all the pictures of
April 9, 2007 - 16:26 ET by bigtimerWhere are all the pictures of the dying little cute big black eyed otters in the local news everywhere and on cable 24/7 eh?
Heck I remember when they were going to be hurt pop. wise, possibly having to put them on the Endangered Species list because of that big bad oil spill with the Exxon Valdez....which was a bunch of BS!
The media had pictures of them all over the place, where are they now...hmmmm?
Only when it suits their (the greenies) purposes that's where.
Btw...they are plentiful, they will be just fine, nature works how nature has always worked...and always will.
I love the otters...they can be mean as heck if ya mess with them...absolutely adorable to watch otherwise, saw them every single day for nine years in Seward...lol!
You can't take one area and s
April 9, 2007 - 17:26 ET by BlameTheMediaYou can't take one area and say, gee, it's been cold there... see, no global warming. It's overall averages for the earth. Any one city or state does not tell the trend of overall GLOBAL warming averages. That is why it is called GLOBAL warming and not Alaska warming, or European warming... you get the idea.
BTM...Records for cold temps
April 9, 2007 - 17:31 ET by bigtimerBTM...
Records for cold temps were broke all over the USA this year oh whize one...get a clue someday...being in a bubble is not a good thing, it will get popped eventually and you and your other leftist whiz-bangs will go poof!
So you are not disputing wh
April 9, 2007 - 17:39 ET by BlameTheMediaSo you are not disputing what I said.
Others can carry on with you
April 9, 2007 - 17:43 ET by bigtimerOthers can carry on with you troll, I have had my fill of you long ago.
You do not read and retain...never have..
Troll on....
And, you dodged it... just
April 9, 2007 - 17:48 ET by BlameTheMediaAnd, you dodged it... just as you always do. good job big.
Brilliant, Blamer! (you twit)
April 9, 2007 - 17:36 ET by RJBrilliant! Why, thanks, Blamer, for enlightening the uneducated masses. We never coulda thunk of that!
Blamer you twit. Go back and read the first two sentences. The post wasn't talking about one geographic area "proving" anything. It was pointing out the irony, and talking about the fact that every little tweak of warm weather is reported and promoted as "proof" of GW.
"Did we think Kyoto would [reduce global warming] when we signed it? . . . Hell no!" -Al Gore
RJ,Apparently irony is too nu
April 9, 2007 - 17:46 ET by BlondeRJ,
Apparently irony is too nuanced a concept for our resident Global Warmer.
Hey. they're trying to tell u
April 9, 2007 - 17:56 ET by danboHey. they're trying to tell us that Richard Lindzen is part of their consensus. And believes in the AGW thesis. And everyone who disagrees is a Criminal.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Go back and read all the co
April 9, 2007 - 17:52 ET by BlameTheMediaGo back and read all the comments in all the blogs about GW... it is definately not believed as valid at all... regardless of how the press treats it. That was my point. Nitpicking about a state's weather is a good way to avoid the larger discussion. But, looking at the big picture isn't easy. I'm sorry it's so difficult.
Blamer, please tell me you're not that stupid
April 9, 2007 - 18:14 ET by RJBlamer, please tell me you're not that stupid....oh, nevermind...that's rhetorical.
The post began and ended talking about the differences in reporting warm weather events as opposed to cold weather events. In between, it described a particular event and even had a little fun with how it may have gotten the attention of the media. If you wanted to respond to an individual poster, the way it works here is you should have gone to that post and clicked on "reply." See how easy, even for you?
Seriously, are you really that stupid, or are you just pushing an agenda?....nevermind...rhetorical again.
Then, blame, you can explain
April 9, 2007 - 19:50 ET by UnsaneThen, blame, you can explain the following, if you can set down the cross of guilt long enough to do so:
1) If the Kyoto Protocol is designed to solve GLOBAL warming, why are China, Mexico, and India exempt?
2) Why is tropical deforestation not addressed anywhere in the Kyoto Protocol?
3) Exit Glacier in Seward, AK has been melting since 1780. What was causing it to melt then?
4) Why was last year's hurricane season so damn quiet?
5) Why was I chipping ice off of my truck this past winter, in a city (San Antonio) where ice storms are extremely rare?
6) Why was it, that for Christmas 2004, snow fell south and east of said city, where snow rarely falls?
7) Why was the world's highest temperature set in 1922?
8) Why did it snow in Lisbon and New Delhi in the winter of 2005-2006? Why did it snow in Johannesburg in July 2006?
9) Do you oppose farming, as it is the world's most environmentally destructive activity?
10) Why don't environmentalists advocate the increased use of nuclear power? It works for France, which gets 78.5% of their juice from it, and they don't even have permanent storage facilities for waste, unlike Finland and the United States!
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Noel, here's another victim of the all-purpose boogyman, GW
April 9, 2007 - 18:03 ET by RJNoel, the Washington Post just ran a story from that region, declaiming another "Global Warming" horror. Apparently, on Vancouver Island in British Columbia, there's a new fungus growing that is causing unexpected illness and death. It comes from Australia, where it's less lethal, and may have been imported on nursery trees.
Guess what's to blame? You got it. Global Warming.
Forget that there are countless examples of foreign plants and animals that cause unexpected destruction when introduced to North America. Forget that the fungus could have mutated in any other ideal location. Forget the entire wide world of warm areas open to the fungus.
Nope. It's that all-purpose boogyman, Global Warming.