‘Forbes on Fox’ Panel Debates Whether ABC Should Fire Rosie O’Donnell

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

Barbara Walters and the folks at ABC should be very pleased with themselves, for all the recent nutty remarks by Rosie O’Donnell precipitated a discussion on Saturday’s “Forbes on Fox” about whether or not the controversial co-host of “The View” should be fired.

Though the group seemed to agree that the current “View” formula of making exceedingly shocking statements might be helping ratings, the consensus was that ABC and Disney were risking their long-term reputations by being associated with such non-stop anti-American sentiments.

As the flow of the discussion was really quite good, and host David Asman did a great job of moderating, what follows is a transcript of this segment without any interruptions or pontifications which might unnecessarily reduce your entertainment pleasure:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

DAVID ASMAN, FNC HOST: Rosie O’Donnell, spouting out wild ideas like the U.K. planned the Iranian hostage crisis, and that 9/11 was an inside job that the U.S. took part in. Can all of this help the bottom line of ABC and its parent company, Disney? I don’t see how, but let’s go in focus and find out. Michelle Steele says she knows how. How could that help, Michelle?

MICHELLE STEELE, FORBES.COM REPORTER:  David, for Disney shareholders, this is an unequivocal positive for them. In fact, I’ll go a step farther and say that Rosie O’Donnell should say even more outrageous things. I mean, quite frankly, look at the ratings of “The View.” They’ve never been higher.

ASMAN: So, controversy stimulates ratings, and that’s good for ABC Dennis?

DENNIS KNEALE, MANAGING EDITOR “FORBES”:  It sure does, it sure does up to a certain point. But Rosie has now passed that point of critical mass, and ABC needs to silence her with extreme prejudice. It should fire her. It should get rid of her. She is doing things that are bad for the country and bad for our people and the fact that she brought in like almost triple the viewers of a year ago is not reason enough to keep her on, and she’s going to go way too far.

ASMAN: So, Neil, Dennis says, “Short term it’s good for ABC but long-term they have to get rid of her?”

NEIL WEINBERG, SENIOR EDITOR “FORBES”: Dennis is just wrong. Let’s face it. People are calling her Rosie the Rabble Rouser, Turnaround Rosie. All these crazy things. But that's great for ratings. That’s great for ABC. There’s all these talking heads including us on TV 24 hours a day. It’s all about getting your voice out there and that's what she is doing.

ASMAN: So Jim, any news is good news for ratings?

JIM MICHAELS, EDITORIAL VICE PRESIDENT “FORBES”:  If I were advising a quality product, I would not want it associated with this loudmouth ignoramus and if I were ABC, I’d see as there are a lot better ways to get ratings than have somebody get on the air and abuse our country and oppose the fight against terror.

ASMAN: Alright, Steve, good or bad for ABC and Disney?

STEVE FORBES, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF “FORBES”: Oh, short term it’s good, but it’s like a dead cat bounce. After a while the ranting and raving wears thin, and after a while ABC is going to look for another carnival act. It’s like a freak show.

ASMAN: But, you’re big in the media business. But, isn’t that old adage true that as long as you spell the name right it’s good news?

FORBES: After a while no and in terms of the ranting and raving, there’s only one Jerry Springer.

ASMAN: So, Michelle, the boss says you are all wrong?

STEELE: I think the bottom line here, the proof is in the pudding though David, and Steve. Look at the ratings at ABC for "The View." They have never been better, and Rosie is there for one reason and it isn't to ring the Liberty Bell for journalism quite frankly. Nobody’s confusing her with Edward R. Murrow. It's to sell ads.

ASMAN: But Neil if she says things that are so outrageous all the time she becomes predictable, doesn’t she, and then people begin to turn her off.

WEINBERG: But the question is does she loose her credibility and anger people so much --

ASMAN: Lose her credibility? Isn't that long gone?

WEINBERG: I mean, some people think when she says look our media is owned by four big companies and if you want to hear what is going on, listen to media from around the world. People agree with that. But when she says 9/11 was a government plot, people get angry and turned off.

ASMAN: Yeah.

KNEALE: You know, it is one thing to make jokes about the hair of my good friend Donald Trump. It’s another thing to imply that our government was involved in 9/11. Now you’re treading on sacred ground. How dare she, and how dare ABC let her do it.

ASMAN: Michelle, to a point, you get to a point where it becomes a matter of principle where you turn her off if she keeps going this root, don’t you?

STEELE: Exactly. And that's the great thing about a free market economy is that people can choose to turn it off and not read her blog and many people aren’t reading her blog --

ASMAN: People can choose to do that but isn't that in the end bad news for ABC and Disney if they do?

STEELE: Of course if they do but so far they haven't been.

FORBES: Michelle, I have a question for you. Would you allow on a show, your show a holocaust denier and give credibility to that view?

STEELE: Those are two completely different brands, and as far as ABC is concerned, as far as the viewer is concerned…

FORBES: So, saying that the United States government killed 3,000 of its own citizens, where’s the proof?

STEELE: Steve, it’s a coffee klatch. Look at the comments on YouTube. People are unequivocally against Rosie, but they’re still watching.

ASMAN: Yeah, but Neil, I got to say she is this close away from doing what Steve suggested, denying the holocaust. I mean, that’s along the same lines of these 9/11 conspiracy theories.

WEINBERG: I agree, and it’s a very fine line right now. When she starts to spout things like that people get very turned off.  But if she says things that are just enough outrageous, sufficiently outrageous, people are interested.

MICHAELS: Unfortunately there are naïve people out there who believe what she said. If I were ABC, I’d look for long-term profits rather than short term profits. I would dump her.

ASMAN: Dennis, what about that niche audience, there is a niche audience, there are these conspiracy theorists out there, and we don’t like them, but they’re there, and they might keep tuning in to Rosie.

KNEALE: But, that’s the narrowest part. You know, Rosie got her start because she was nice. She needs to go back to being nice. And when you’re this mean, this is anger turned outward. She’s depressed, and she needs to get on medication.

ASMAN: Steve, could advertisers begin to pull their money out would that be the bottom line for this?

FORBES: Sure, you’ve had shows in the past that have had good ratings but good advertisers say, “We don't want to be associated with that.”

ASMAN: You’re saying the same thing, Dennis.

KNEALE: The first time sponsors start to say “I don’t want to be associated with her” then Rosie is going to be hearing a different tune from her (?).  

ASMAN: Michelle, last word from you, if advertisers begin to pull, that’s got to be the bottom line for Disney.

STEELE: Of course, of course. And that’s exactly why they fired Bill Maher about three years ago.

ASMAN: Alright, final word for Michelle, and first word for Michelle.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who knew you could do well be

Who knew you could do well being a snarky A-hole. The world is turned inside out.

She has the right to say wh

She has the right to say what she wants. If ABC defines the 'quality' of her comments by ratings, then that too is their perogative.

She defines anti-America to the fullest extent, and for that fact I would prefer that she remains on the show. Permit viewers to associate her comments to the goals of the dems.

The idea of allowing her to to discuss her perspective on national television also opens the door to the obvious discrimination towards the conservative view.

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life

I totally agree with you JDW.

I totally agree with you JDW.  ABC is going to retain her as long as she boosts ratings on The View; when she becomes a ratings liability, they'll toss her out.

The best thing for O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, et al to do is . . . . Ignore her.  Yeah, that's right.  As long as she gets the Right spun up, she serves a purpose.  If they ignore her, she'll fade.

Meanwhile, everytime a Dem, or liberal pundit, or a Hollywood know-it-all exposes themselves to unscripted interviews, keep asking them if they agree with O'Donnell's latest claim or accusation.  Those that join ranks with O'Donnell will look like idiots, and those who wisely distance themselves from her will become targets of O'Donnell and the looney Left for marginalizing her.

And by all means, use video of her nonsense for fundraising.

Use her, don't lose her.

I agree with the ignore her p

I agree with the ignore her part.

I have wished after the Trump/Rosie BS that she would just go away...him too as far as they both go.

They both brought the attention they needed for ratings for both their shows.

I am so sick of all of them...if they are ignored, nobody is going to be interested other than the low level of people that already were...which isn't a lot.

Wished Fox would just shut up about it.

Ditto

Dittox3.

Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

The dems are upset with Pel

The dems are upset with Pelosi yet she remains part of the gang. The news media will not reveal the entire story.

Rush is smart enough to avoid Rosie. I don't watch Hannity, Colmes is an idiot. O'Reilly is the type who would make himself available on Rosie's level so I only pick and choose his columns.

Permit the leftists to dig their own graves.

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

If you are going to whine about spelling... get a life

Good ratings are only good fo

Good ratings are only good for one thing -more money through advertising. Once advertisers start getting the message that their brand is becoming associated with Rosie the Ridiculous, that huge audience stops being an advantage. Malkin has already headed that direction in a recent Vent.

Spelling

Hey, I'm whining about spelling. Spelling correctly is the mark of a civilized man (or woman). There ain't no cure for stupid. --Ron White

If anyone missed this, it r

If anyone missed this, it re-airs @ 2am PST Monday.

Noel,Of all the pictures you

Noel,

Of all the pictures you could have shown, this had to be the most disgusting.

Through the miracle of modern technology, computer scientists are able to compress the 4000 pounds of those two hideous faces into such a tiny little picture. This is why I hardly ever use my computer.                              

Guess their genders and win a prize. The prize is allowing you to smash your Louisville Slugger into your monitor so you'll never be exposed to that scumbag terrorist, its fugly defender, and its propaganda machine, the View, again.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

Trix...I think they look just

Trix...

I think they look just like identical twins!

Seriously!

 . . .  you've never seen t

 . . .  you've never seen them in the same room together.

Big-headed Rosie

From one large-cranium person to another (Rosie),

How can someone with such a big head be SO STUPID?

Cunservatyve military medical guy

If you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul's vote!

rosie

cunsevatyve, a lot of dinasaurs were very large and had large craniums. Just goes to show that even when you have such a large head, doesn't mean there's a brain inside...

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER

rosie

I think her hanging upside down is the cause of her stupidity.  All the feces rushes to her brain.

Rosie

"It is unconscionable that anyone would use the airways to utter such disregard for the dignity of human beings who have accomplished much and deserve great credit."

Was this comment about Rosie?  Of course not, it was about Imus and his comments about the Rutgers Womans BB Team.  TOo bad Liberals can't get as upset about Rosie.  In her case it's free speech, you can see what it is in the case of Don Imus.  

There is nothing 'enjoyable'

There is nothing 'enjoyable' about watching THAT view! I rarely watch The View. It is too upsetting to watch. Seriously, my day gets off to bad start if I watch The View. It is hard to listen to someone trash our country and true Christianity, without being able to chime in and say something. I normally just wait and read about the demise of that show on NewsBusters. :o)

"ABC needs to silence

"ABC needs to silence her with extreme prejudice."

He said it, I didn't!

And where is Bawbwa Wawa in all of this? IMO, she lost any credibility or reputation when she first started "The View".

Has anyone told Michelle Malk

Has anyone told Michelle Malkin that she's running a banner ad for M&Ms on her blog?

This is totally on-topic for those informed, BTW.

-PJ

I am John Doe!

Rosie

Someone should point out that most people in America do not give a hoot what Rosie says except, maybe, Fox News and Ms. Malkin. Meanwhile, ABC is laughing all the way to the Nielsen Bank. BTW .... you never hear on Fox that the Trumpster is about as anti-Bush and anti-war as Rosie.

Rosie epitomizes the Liberal

Rosie epitomizes the Liberal View.  They want exactly what the same result, from deviant, or proven unsuccessful behaviour.

They Want Babies without Men

They Want Peace Via Surrender

They Want Wealth without Work

They Want Victory without a battle

They Want Marriage without definition

They Want Self Esteem without Earning it

They Want Relavance through the press

They Want Free Speech- By shutting us up.

GeoGolf, well said!

GeoGolf, well said!

Well done

Well done

Perfect.

Perfect.

Fire Rosie?

Take a closer look at the picture of Saddam that Rosie is holding up  - Hmmm - like father, like daughter?

LOL golden!Somewhere I think

LOL golden!

Somewhere I think on this thread I said twins....I have thought they look like sis and bro from the first time I saw her holding this up by her face long ago!

Resemblance is amazing no matter how you look at it...and their thinking is a lot alike too!

Spoooooky!

STEELE: Steve, it’s a cof

STEELE: Steve, it’s a coffee klatch. Look at the comments on YouTube.
People are unequivocally against Rosie, but they’re still watching.

No we're not, we're reacting to her comments, which is doing nothing for the show's advertisers except to associate their products with a train wreck.

Conservatism in the defence of liberty is no vice

IMHO Rosie has every right to discuss those who still raise
unanswered questions, that in spite of the sloppy and inept 911
Commission / NIST report fiascos remain outstanding on everyones mind.
The state of the art in certifications, standards, actuarial, civil,
architectural, structural, aviation and transportation engineering have
been left totally discredited and destabilized by the smoking pile of
unanswered mysteries concerning the colossl failure of those Twin
Towers.

Steel framed building skeletons remained standing in Hiroshima!

Unfortunately for Mr Asman, the notion that certain parties and
individuals within the US not only could, but almost certainly appear
to have been "in on the 9/11 plot" does not necessarily implicate any
more than a possible handful of US co-conspirators in the right places.
Ii is certainly not unpatriotic to suggest so.

Criminals will do horrific things, and the unsolved and untried
crimes of 9/11 remain cold case files as long as people in places of
power continue to conceal evidence to mask their own negligence,
stupidity and incompetence. If anything it is 'liberal' negligence to
permit this to go on.

For my part, if Leslie Robertson had built me a building that
grossly malfunctioned as badly as these WTC towers allegedly did, I
would certainly not ever be caught recommending his companies' fine
services again, even to my competitors..

Agentblue...Of course she has

Agentblue...

Of course she has a right to say stupid things. As much right as those like myself that point out the stupid things she says.

There is NO mystery as to why the towers came down. Those that love conspiracies will never accept this and that is their right. The rest of us will move on and try to keep this from happening again by supporting a government that hunts down terrorists. On a personal note... I have no problem with torture as a means of ferreting out terror. You know, fight fire with fire, and eye for an eye, etc.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

Clear

Unfortunately here, we are not talking about some rusty old $3,000 car that ran into a tree, nor a $30,000 combat grade Humvie that happened upon a roadside bomb. These towers were complex, over-built, over-specified, proudly and conservatively assembled multi-billion dollar award-winning structural creations of momentous and collossal magnitude upon which hundreds of thousands of peoples businesses, lives, security, safety, investments, reputations, commerce and trade depended. Every stage and aspect of their design and construction was supervised by well-respected masters of their sciences and trades, who had to jump through mile-high hoops to compete for the privilege.

Every single greatest and tiniest of aspects of every single greatest and tiniest of parts and a complete conception of how every single part was to be arranged, assembled, required and behave was a completely known and well understood, well-experienced and time tested, certified, factual specification. Indeed, right down to what, where, when, how, where from and how much it would need to cost for each and every part and where when, how and how much it would need to cost for each and every assembly of each and all in what order, to be made in what manner, with what tools and how every single thing would be delivered scheduled and emplaced was pre-specified as a completely known and anticipated fact of total certainty.

Once all those great and tiny details where generated and fully documented, sourced-out, priced-out and timed-out, the entire conceptual assembly was modelled, tested, tweaked, retested and re-examined for every possible expectable collective, and localized expected stress, failure mode and load capability. Based upon that primary and then secondary testing and re-analysis, the entire modelled structure and each substructure were re-evaluated and every contingency of design weakness was addressed and reserved once more with, then, an extra added margin of safety and cost effectiveness consideration. Then, all with all modifications were once again reconsidered, reviewed and retested for the final re-evaluation.

Wind tests, storm tests, fire tests, flood tests, earthquake tests, explosion tests and yes, even airliner impact tests were rated and completed for every region of the structure and stage of their development

Then, and only then, was this immense project finally ready for multiple third party evaluation, inspection, actuarial/insurance assessments, government and regulatory certifications, contract tendering and final construction trades subcontracting contests. Once construction began each major part, material and subassembly and interconnection was sampled and lab tested to certify it's over-conformity with and beyond the design standards minimal and base criteria.

The comical and nonsensical slack-jawed liberal allegation that these twin masterworks proudly representating the very zenith of the worlds most conservatively-rated achievement in the state of the art of architectural, materials, structural and mechanical engineering excellence, quality and craftsmanship simply 'broke", totally collapsed and just "fell down" all of a sudden due to some ill-defined and "unlikely" flaw coincidentally relating to some sort of a poorly documented 1 hour smokey 'fire' and less than a quarter of broken columns on a few floors as the NIST and FEMA "reports" do is totally and completely unacceptable and ludicrous.

While nowadays, CAD-CAM has greatly speeded up, aided and improved upon the personnel needed and turnover time for those formerly laborious and redundant project design tasks, there is nothing new in our methods or knowledge of materials that was unknown in the 1970's save the new ability today, to under-build, effectively doing more, more cheaply with less! In fact, as a standard for it's day you cannot find a modern skyscraper since that has subsequently been better built than were those two established landmark industry benchmarks.

To borrow a phrase from Robert Jackson, US Chief Council, Nuremberg the bland, liberal guesswork assumptions in these lazy bureaucrats "Official 9/11 conspiracy Theories" are "so malignant and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated."

As far as fighting off terrorists goes, please show me where are the anti-aircraft turrets on this new "Freedom Tower" with which to fight off the cavemen?