The Last Time: Global Warming Recommendations That Will Put You In the Red

Photo of Julia A. Seymour.

Time is money. Those words took on special meaning when Time magazine gave its readers “51 Things You Can Do to Make a Difference” and stop global warming.

Number 5: "Pay the carbon tax."

Liberalism at its finest ... taxes and more taxes. The magazine was neutral on which major government regulation should control our lives – caps or taxes. But when it came to taxes, Time writers were quick to point out even a “10% flat carbon tax” “may not be enough.” Even worse, according to the magazine, it might not be either cap-and-trade or big taxes – the “environmental equivalent of Elvis vs. the Beatles.” The publication claimed “in the end, the world may need both.”

Number 40: "Get a carbon budget."

According to Time, everyone in the world would be allocated a certain carbon output to "spend" and anyone who went overbudget would have to pay taxes on the excess. One can only hope exhaling isn't part of the calculation.

Number 36: "Play the market."

The folks at Time need to go take Econ 101 because they have a serious misunderstanding of free market economics. Time said, "environmentalists are using the force of the free market" to buy and sell carbon credits. But the government creation of an artificial market is really just another tax and there certainly isn't anything "free" about it.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If I have to pay a 10% flat

If I have to pay a 10% flat rate carbon tax to the IRS, they can keep wishing but I won't pay it. First of all congress would have to pass a bill to make it possible. Second they would suffer dearly in the following election period.

So in short if the voters are as dems percieve as being lemmings then the vote will pass. And so ends the demorcatic "mandate". Frankly I think the mandate has run dry already.

And, on average, by how many

And, on average, by how many degrees do home and office airconditioning systems lower the environment.  Though I still really like my Killer idea for nuclear powered chiller submarines cruising and offering cruises under the polar ice caps I must ask do we just need to all open our windows together during our cooling season?  

Don't forget to throw your extra ice outside as well as ice that has been in freezer for more than maybe a couple days.

The biggest thing Time magazi

The biggest thing Time magazine could do to help the world is GET A CLUE!

I have to wonder just how stupid Congress would have to get before the military took over the country for a while.  The members of Congress, like the members of the military take an oath when they begin service.  They swear to defend and protect the constitution and the country.  The Democrats, especially, have repeatedly and egregiously violated their oaths of office by attempting to implement the demands of the Communist Manifesto rather than following the words of the Constitution.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Isn't raising taxes the Dem

Isn't raising taxes the Democrat Party's answer to everything? You'd think people would stop electing them because of that.

Al Gore also claimed a "consensus" existed in which people agreed to allow the federal government to spy on all of us.

Will Congress do the right Global Warming thing?

Okay, its doomsday and we are depending upon the congressional royalty
for quick reasonable realistic actions to lower “Global Warming”… of
course China and India have flipped off the “gashouse greenies”, go
figure.
In 2007 congress should… as far as families go, provide GENEROUS TAX
CREDITS (as under Carter but naturally taken away by the short-sighted
congress later) for buying a 4 cyclinder car, installing ANY energy
efficient house stuff, riding in cabs-buses-trains over a certain # of
days or miles yearly and perhaps for a couple more creative ideas. Make
it simple. No more agencies or bigger tax hassles.
But watch for the royalty to fight like “2 cats in a sack” over what
should be an easy bipartisan thing. We know which cat wants to hammer
you with more taxes. Be on the lookout for that. Congress should not
give these things another short political “sundown” but make these
10-15 year actions. Remove the camera grandstanding, juvenile behavior,
pandering and posturing. No “offsets” for rich libs and others. Reach
out to the other 90% of the population first by using some of OUR TAX
money as a “carrot” to a better environment. Do not start taxing
families again. The bloated federal budget has the money. For starters,
the NEA and NPR could be lined out for added revenue. Limit all federal
(Did I use the word “limit” and “federal” together?) departments to 3%
increases for the next 10 years. Its doomsday, remember? There are no
excuses. We voters are watching. Cue the clowns.

The Conservative Crawfish

Number 40: "Get a carb

Number 40: "Get a carbon budget.  According to Time, everyone
in the world would be allocated a certain carbon output to "spend" and
anyone who went overbudget would have to pay taxes on the excess.

So it wouldn't actually involve using less, just paying more, right? Isn't that kind of like Gore's "carbon offsets"?

I don't have any problem at all with using more if you can afford to pay for it. I just wish these hypocrites would quit acting like they are doing something great. If they really believe their own hype, they should use less energy in spite of the fact that they can afford to use more.

The alarmists say we must do

The alarmists say we must do something NOW! I suggest that GW issues an Executive Order banning the use of all internal combustion engines starting NOW. Cars, planes, trucks, trains, ships, Oh my!

Sonny...ROTFLMAO!Now that wou

Sonny...

ROTFLMAO!

Now that would be priceless!

You've struck on the basis fo

motherbelt, you've struck on the basis for the international 'consensus' on GW, so much as it exists.  Kyoto laid it out so plainly.  In this global environment crisis with citizen , where some zealots insist that it may already be too late to act, the answers lie more in the transfer of wealth than in effective countermeasures. 

At the international level, it's the 30+ 'developed nations' in Annex I of the Kyoto Accord who must transfer wealth to 'developing countries' like GHG-producers China and India.

At the national level, it's levying taxes on citizens --- yet one more revenue-raising scheme to be abused by corrupt politicians.

At the personal level, it's elites like rich boy Prince Albert Gore paying indulgences (conveniently labeled as carbon offsets) so that they don't have to suffer the inconvenience of changing their carbon-heavy lifestyles.

The generation of new sources of revenue and the prospect of hammering free enterprise is precisely why the Communists, Maoists, socialists, and anarchists of the Left have embraced GW as a rallying issue, and why their solutions are all about power and money and not about action. 

Links to: The Cult of Global Warming

Here are some excellent links to what many are now comfortably calling......................The Cult of Global Warming

Jerusalem Post: The Cult of Global Warming

Minnesota Senate District 42: The Cult of Global Warming

Jay Reding: The Cult of Global Warming

mediabistroforum: The Cult of Global Warmingism (me)

Cato Institute Blog: The Global Warming Cult

Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

The "Cult of Global Warm

The "Cult of Global Warming" is seriously more like the "Cult of Personality".

If we have another "off year" of hurricanes, be ready for the "warmers" to blame it on GW.

If we match the predictions of the NOAAs of the world, the "warmers" will say "see?  we told you!"

If we exceed the predictions, then the "warmers" will be trumpeting from highest peaks that unless we do something right now, we'll all be dead by 2009. 

--Hokiecon

As a diver. I now know, why I

As a diver. I now know, why I had problems with air consumprion. I had a hole in my BCD. This 240 out of shape guy now conserves air like his 120 lb wife.

If they do start a carbon tax. (These are democrats. Are there any taxes they don't like?) I do hope they tax breathing. And that all sceptics and conservitives be as light on air as I am. And that all leftist and warmers be heavy breathers.

But then. that will be the day they move to a flat tax.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

We're well past the "tipping point"

"The party that raises taxes will pay dearly in the next election"?   Statistics and history show just the opposite.   48% of adults of working age adults pay no federal income tax (excluding FICA which the government assures us is not a tax but actually savings going into a secure trust fund for our old age).  Also, over 70% receive some type of regular government check.  It may be actual welfare, "earned income credit" or as a government employee (teacher, IRS agent, military, etc.).   Whether someone earns their check or not and whether the goods or services they provide are needed by the electorate, everyone who receives a government check has a stake in the government being able to continue to pay those checks and, they hope, increase the amounts in the future.  It all adds up to the fact that we are WAY past the "tipping point" on taxes.   That's the "tipping point" where more people (voters) benefit than are hurt by a tax increase. 
Things have changed drastically (for the worse) since Mondale sank his 1984 presidential campaign promising to raise taxes.  Today, the politician who proposes the LARGEST "revenue enhancement" and promises to spread those "enhancements" around to as many voters as possible is the winner, not the loser.
********************************************************************
At about the time our original 13 states adopted their new constitution, in the year 1787, Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor at The University of Edinborough) had this to say about "The Fall of The Athenian Republic" some 2,000 years prior:
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.

The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.
***************************************************************
You've probably read this many times in low-tax/flat-tax fundraiser letters.  These words finally found traction when George Bush used them in a speech a few years ago.  Since then, the left hasn't attacked the message as its inherent truth makes it irrefutable but, instead, that Tyler didn't exist, someone else said it, Tyler was actually "Taylor" and on and on.   As if that makes any difference.  Even if it was written as a high school term paper in 1932, it is absolute true that has been proven over and over again in EVERY great democratic or even partially free civilization that has come and GONE.   Emphasis on the GONE.  Ours has now survived longer than the quoted 200-year average.  We are now on borrowed time.  
If our many enemies outside our borders and those amongst us don't destroy us first, the new religion of Environmentalism headlined by the false scare of Global Warming dragging us into the bottomless pit of one-world government will end our experiment with democracy just as surely.  We're well past that "tipping point" where the wheels become to begin to wobble then all Hell breaks loose.  Short of a decade of snowy summers, the onset of worldwide communism that didn't die but just changed names in 1990 is now only a matter of time.  Call it whatever you like.   But, in the end, it is worldwide totalitarianism.   The ultimate goal of ruthless demagogues since the beginning of time.  It was a very long and complex path but a successful one nonetheless.    The path and the means didn't matter.  It's only the end result that matters.   At best, we can now only hope to lose as slowly as possible.