Media Eat Up Food Police Messages and Ignore Group's Extremism

Photo of Julia A. Seymour.

If it wouldn’t cause death, the Center for Science in the Public Interest would probably try to ban eating and drinking altogether, but when the media report on CSPI rarely are its extreme positions emphasized.

According to CSPI, "it takes more than willpower" to make decisions about what to eat, so it's here to help by promoting bans, more regulations and higher taxes on what it considers "unhealthy."

“[A] new study says that if you’re out for Chinese, even the good stuff could be bad for you,” said ABC’s Terry Moran on “Nightline” March 21.

In that same report, Jessica Yellin and CSPI executive director Michael Jacobson bantered happily about the problems with Chinese food: fat and sodium. Of course "Nightline" was reporting CSPI's latest study, the same day the food police released "Wok Carefully: CSPI Takes a (Second) Look at Chinese Restaurant Food."

Often called a "consumer advocacy" group by the media, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), crops up in quite a few reports: 27 in the month of February 2007 alone.

But CSPI is certainly extreme. The group has waged campaigns or initiated food scares at least 91 times since its founding in 1971, according to Steven J. Milloy of the Free Enterprise Education Institute.

In fact it has attacked the safety of drinking water, fresh produce, an additive to bread dough, eggs, as well as wine, beer, soda, milk, coffee, sugar, artificial sweeteners, salt, oils and fats, poultry, meats and cheese for various reasons. And that list doesn't even include "junk food" and sweets, types of food (Italian, Greek, etc.) or particular restaurants CSPI has attacked. So what are we supposed to eat -- grass?

CSPI's Jacobson has even said that the use of salt by food makers is "good for funeral directors and coffin makers, but it is a disaster for shoppers and restaurant patrons."

As Business & Media Institute adviser, Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, has written, "The word 'moderation' does not seem to be part of this movement's vocabulary."

If only the media would make that clear.

—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Do you know what is really ir

Do you know what is really ironic? That we Americans who are age 40 and over grew up in a world where we ate Twinkies, pizza, McDonalds and TV dinners and we are the healthiest, longest-living Americans ever. Why is this never brought up?  Do you all know how much the age expectancy has shot up since 1907?

What would everyone have? We all live till 150 but don't get to enjoy any food? This is idiotic alarmism.  There is never never any CONTEXT when the food police are on the warpath. And the media swallows this swill like children gobbled up Fun Dip. Well, at least I did!  I may buy some now, for spite...

Racism

Attacking Chinese food is an overt act of racism. Someone please call Jesse Jackson.

Remember how it was revealed

Remember how it was revealed that saccharin caused cancer and everybody was worried until it was revealed that the test "subjects" received something like 10 times the amount a normal adult would consume in a given day?  I would expect that the CSPI did some "study" using a rodent that was force fed a combination Lo Mein diet 6 times a day for a month. 

--Hokiecon

It was more like 800 cans o

It was more like 800 cans of diet soda per day, but the real scandal is that they banned cyclamates, which when combined with saccharin worked to kill the awful aftertaste. This ruined Fresca, and I still haven't forgiven them. At least now there's Splenda, but I'd rather take informed risks than experience government bans for the interim despite the whims of control freaks.
JMR