Tom Tancredo has become well-known as the country’s most energetic Congressman against illegal immigration. He’s now running for president on that issue. National Public Radio also has a deeply ingrained reputation – as a taxpayer-subsidized network of gooey liberals. They speak in tones so sleep-inducing that their programs should be regarded as a potential traffic hazard.
On April 1, these two legends met, and sparks flew. The program was Sunday’s "All Things Considered" broadcast, hosted by Debbie Elliott. The trouble began at hello: Elliott introduced Tancredo as a man who "gained national prominence with his fierce opposition to allowing illegal immigrants to become citizens."
"Fierce" seems to be an adjective NPR reserves for conservatives. (Liberals are "passionate.") There is no denying Tancredo’s aggression on this issue. But the NPR crowd finds it fierce, as if it’s controversial, as in negative, that a strong majority of Americans find it unacceptable that illegal aliens should step in front of a line of people applying legally for citizenship.
NPR could have just as easily as described Tancredo as fiercely opposed to "allowing illegal immigrants to enter America and collect welfare, health care, and education subsidies." Or that he’s fiercely opposed to allowing illegal immigrants to sneak in, demand to vote on ballots translated into 23 languages, and rally on the Capitol steps for amnesty without any immigration enforcement folks present to check documents. That would be accurate.
But this is NPR, and this liberal sandbox thrives on presenting conservative ideas as not just incorrect, but just this side of insane. After a few calm questions about the Iraq war, Debbie Elliott went on the attack: "I'd like to ask you a little bit about -- I'm going to call it the Tancrazy, I think that's what Esquire called you one time."
It’s fitting that NPR would source a liberal glossy like Esquire, whose editor David Granger has celebrated Bill Clinton as a man with an "unmatched capacity for compassion." Granger’s valentine came in the magazine’s "Genius Issue" in 2005, as the cover hailed Clinton as not merely as a genius, but as "The Most Influential Man in the World." It’s hardly shocking the Esquire people would gleefully mock Tancredo.
Elliott wasn’t done fitting Tancredo for a straitjacket. "You are known for speaking your mind in a way that some might consider outrageous. You've compared Miami to a third world country. At one point, you suggested the U.S. should bomb Mecca in respond to terrorist attacks. You were even part of a group of Colorado lawmakers earlier in your career who called themselves The Crazies. Do you think that voters will be able to look at you as presidential material?"
Quick: Ever heard NPR label a single radical leftist as "crazy"?
Tancredo calmly responded by telling Elliott she was mistaken on one point. "Well, first of all, when you said I called ourselves The Crazies, actually the press dubbed us that." Tancredo explained that’s because his conservative bloc of legislators were trying to cut taxes, which seemed crazy to Democrats and their sympathizers in the "objective" press.
Then consider the other "crazy" statements used by NPR. Tancredo said Miami’s a third-world country. That’s typical of Tancredo’s rhetoric on immigration. But when he was attacked by Florida Gov. Jeb Bush as naive, he retracted the line a bit, saying Miami could be happy with its cultural and ethnic diversity, but "when diversity is worshipped to the detriment of assimilation," it can undermine the civic culture. All that nuance is lost on NPR in its talent for drive-by journalism.
It also sounds shocking to talk about bombing Mecca "in response to terrorist attacks." But Tancredo was being asked on a Florida radio show how America might respond if Islamic terrorists inflicted a nuclear attack on our country, which is a much more dramatic context than NPR’s short-cut question implied. He talked about "taking out holy sites," which might not be popular. But isn’t that also what Islamic insurgents did to the Shia shrine at Samarra in Iraq a year ago? Back then, NPR didn’t describe the actual bombers of Islamic shrines as "crazy," or even as "fierce" like Tancredo. That would apparently be judgmental. Adjectives were reserved for the "grim" outlook for America.
It would also be unlike NPR to use the "crazy" lines on long-shot Democratic presidential candidates – like moon-orbiting Dennis Kucinich. Imagine NPR recycling his lines, like his calling for a Department of Peace, since "The energy of the stars becomes us. We become the energy of the stars. Stardust and spirit unite and we begin: One with the universe." But NPR has avoided a profile of Kucinich since he declared his run for the presidency in December. The day they do that profile, however, you can bet they’ll call him "passionate."















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
USNWR on Tancredo
April 4, 2007 - 13:44 ET by Tim GrahamEver wonder where these national news folks get their hit-job questions from? A quick Internet search finds an article with all of Debbie Elliott's attack lines on Tancredo, a story by U.S. News & World Report.
But, she missed one, Tim ....
April 4, 2007 - 15:19 ET by Gary HallBut, she missed one, Tim ....
I would imagine that the Darfur crisis has been on of great concern for the folks over at "All Things Considered." In fact, in a quick search of their shows, looking for "Darfur," I got 109 hits.
Now over at the U.S. News & World Report piece that you referenced, there was this little bit in the # 8 spot:
Now, one would think that if "All Things Considered," shared an issue with which they are so deeply concerned about, and they have a presidential candidate in their sights who is connected to them with a common cause - a deep conviction to address the crisis, that they would discuss the issue with him. Not a chance. The media does not do this - unless the person is a Democrat, or unless the Republican is really doing it in a way that they simply cannot tolerate (in their view).
I would suggest that this is the MSM's most powerful weapon in their campaign to shape public opinion in favor of liberals and away from others. There is hardly a chance in hell, that any liberal (mainstream) reporter is going to bring up a subject in which a view is actually shared with a Republican.
Another example:
This holds true, especially, for President Bush - On Darfur. This is a powerful story in today's news which should excite the national media, but it will not.
Or, take the HIV/Aids pandemic in Africa and Indonesia. Bush has been highly praised by world leaders for his bold and massive initiative - the $15 billion (and growing) program, and it is beginning to show great successes. The day Helen Thomas asks about it.. well, it's already frozen over.. I covered that already. (;~>
According to a Newsweek Special Report, last May, we find out on page 64 that "only 3% of Americans know" that the Bush administration is a leader in the international fight against HIV/Aids. On the other hand, I bet most of them were already quite clear with the media's oft reminder, as in the opening words of the very same Newsweek Special Report, that "President Ronald Reagan didn't discuss AIDS in a public forum until .. 4 years later ....by which time 12,000 ..died... (he did not publicly utter the term "Aids" until 1987)."
Newsweek repeats that same hateful charge, again, on page 58 of the Special Report.
The entire special report really never does introduce President Bush, who is doing a lot as president, as a player in the game, but they do highlight the ex-president who is very sorry (again) that, as president, he never stepped up to the plate, as his successor did.
Speaking as one proud crazy..
April 4, 2007 - 13:54 ET by bigtimerSpeaking as one proud crazy....I would vote for that crazy in a second flat!
Go Tancredo!
By the way....I will be glad when we get somebody with the guts to quit feeding the likes of the enemy within groups like NPR, the ACLU and PBS with our tax dollars.
Has Tancredo actually propo
April 4, 2007 - 14:01 ET by sarcasmoHas Tancredo actually proposed a total defunding of PBS/NPR? Because I know of a candidate just as strong on illegal immigration as Tancredo who has, for sure, proposed total defunding...And as you know, I'd add the FCC and many other government agencies to the total-defund list.
JMR
I just made a contribution to
April 4, 2007 - 14:15 ET by moonjohnI just made a contribution to Tom Tancredo.
I was encouraged to do this by President Bush.
I just learned that President Bush is negotiating with Republicans in Congress to cut the Border fence in half.
This way they can eliminate the fence by 75 % when the Republicans compromise with the Democrats.
In addition, citizenship will be offered to essentially all illegal aliens rather than those who have been here some time.
This is obviously the New Republican Party.
A party of the illegal Immigrants
By the illegal Immigrants
And for the illegal Immigrants.
It is unlikely that Tancredo can win the nomination.
But if he can stay in the race and get up to 20% of the votes, the other candidates will have to seriously address the issue of illegal immigration.
Hugh Hewitt has been tearin
April 4, 2007 - 15:55 ET by MightyMouthHugh Hewitt has been tearing Tancredo a new one on his radio show. Blaming everything from the passage of the crap filled "Immigration" bill, to losing the last election. All because he did not "compromise" with the dems a year ago.
On the one hand Hugh may have a point, but still I like the fact the Tancredo stuck to his guns. It's too bad 80% of the Republican voters stayed away from the polls last time, now look where we are at!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I for one will support Tancre
April 4, 2007 - 19:39 ET by Clear thinkerI for one will support Tancredo with my money and my vote. What I would really like to see is a Thompson-Tancredo ticket. These are two men that I beleive will not stand for coddling terrorists or illegals.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
I've been following the Tan
April 4, 2007 - 20:08 ET by John in CAI've been following the Tancredo v. Hewitt standoff this week. For anyone who hasn't heard Tom's appearance on Hugh's show Monday, here's a linky to the audio.
Hugh asked Tom back for a full hour, here's Tom's response.
I did think Hugh started off the interview a bit confrontational. However, it was not a yelling match. Hugh started off the interview by asking Tom how committed he really was to the race, since he is continuing to run for his Congressional seat in CO. IMO, that was a fair question. It went downhill from there.
Tancredo started off the interview by being late. He basically showed up, wanted to get his blurb off and leave.
Although I agree with Tancredo in the immigration issue, I see him as a one-trick-pony. Immigration is what brought him national attention, and that's what everyone sees him as - an immigration hawk. I think Tom is doing himself a disservice by not giving Hugh an hour of radio time. If he did, they could get past the acrimony and Tom would have a chance to really explain himself and his positions.
If you want someone who is as tough on border security as Tancredo, with a more complete portfolio and more refined positions on other issues, check out Duncan Hunter.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
Thanks, John.Interesting revi
April 4, 2007 - 20:13 ET by BlondeThanks, John.
Interesting review.
I don't have the time to follow this kind of stuff...but coming from you, it is extremely enlightnening.
Aww, shucks. Thanks ma'am.
April 4, 2007 - 20:20 ET by John in CAAww, shucks. Thanks ma'am.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
Tancredo on NPR
April 4, 2007 - 14:23 ET by River CityTancredo is in the perfect position.
He isn't really a contender for president so when he does get the opportunity for an interview he can be candid. He was clear from the launch of his campaign that he was in the race to ensure illegal immigration was a topic all the candidates were forced to discuss during the election. I hope he continues to beat the anti-illegal immigrant drum. I also hope the MSM continues to give him column inches and air time. It can only help get the message out.
If by "sleep inducing&qu
April 4, 2007 - 15:28 ET by waka wakaIf by "sleep inducing" you mean not YELLING AT YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK!, like that pill-popping Rush Limbaugh, I guess you're right.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
brent shouldn't have said that
April 4, 2007 - 15:44 ET by tumbler_2007It wasn't his best choice of words, sleep-inducing. Tune-out inducing would better describe the style of NPR types.
Their voices are all out of one mannerist cookie-cutter; elite cum affected mincing at the microphone. The males sound like women who've just given birth after a 12 hour labor; and the females like Katherine Hepburn clones. Androgynous audio at its worst. There's not so much sleeping pill sound, they induce turning off the radio.
NPR's "Some Things Con
April 4, 2007 - 18:04 ET by radiofitz34NPR's "Some Things Concidered" (intentional) would be a good program if were really all things. As for Tancredo, I believe that 10 years down the road, the American people will wish they had paid closer attention to him. Instead in the year 2017, we will apparently be going to "Carbon banks" to offset our guilty pleasures.
Hey there's nothing like getting distracted from reality. Just think, by 2017, there will over 50 million illegal immigrants not including children born in the US. For that you would have to add another 7 to 10 million.
He talked about "takin
April 4, 2007 - 19:32 ET by BlameTheMediaHe talked about "taking out holy sites," which might not be popular.
But isn’t that also what Islamic insurgents did to the Shia shrine at
Samarra in Iraq a year ago?
So, exactly what is the comparison here? The Islamic insurgents did it in Iraq and they weren't called crazy, so it's okay for him to say it and we shouldn't call him crazy? For an American to promote taking out holy places, regardless, reduces us to the level of the terrorists. We are suppose set some kind of example (would someone tell bush this please).
I think that you should be th
April 4, 2007 - 23:56 ET by James2306I think that you should be the one told this. How about the example oe supporting victory instead of begging to be allowed to lose.
The hottest places in hell are oft reserved for those who in times of moral crisis remain neutral
yesssssssssssssssssssssssssss
April 4, 2007 - 20:28 ET byyessssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tom Tancredo 2008!!!!!!
:::: Singing, "I'm Proud To Be An American" :::::
If anyone would like to read about our next president, Tom Tancredo, or even listen to him, click here
Debra...
:o)
no "floundering"
April 5, 2007 - 10:16 ET by foolnomoreThank's!!, Tom, for standing up an saying what "all" the so called candidates should be doing,did he check the polls before he went to the, radio/Zzz/,station's first, I don't think so,it's so sad to watch this "good"man be hang out ,by the "new world order",no "flip'n -$-flopping ,or i'am reporting for Duty,brr'up, ,"thanks again Tom"