Just when you thought the New York Times couldn't sink any lower than its chairman Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger ranting how he was sorry America wasn't a socialist and pacifist nation, the money-losing paper manages to surprise you.
That's really the only thing you can say after reading Times Arts tv critic Alessandra Stanley's attempt to cast the popular-but-fading Fox show "American Idol" into the 2000 election controversy.
Yes, you read that correctly. According to the Times, the reason that teenage girls looove tuning in is because Al Gore didn't beat George W. Bush.
The lunacy is just too funny:
“Idol,” now in its sixth season, has its selection process backward. In this country, people can vote for whomever they want — even Al Gore in 2000 — but the last word is left to the Electoral College and even the justices of the Supreme Court.
The most interesting thing about this season’s ado is not Mr. Malakar or Mr. Stern or even Simon Cowell; it’s the current obsession with voting on television shows and Internet sites like YouTube.
“Idol,” which began as a British hit, made its debut in the United States in 2002 — a scant two years after one of the closest presidential elections in American history. The talent show spawned a multitude of copycat shows with voter call-in gimmicks; even CBS News allows viewers to decide which story Steve Hartman will cover on his weekly segment, “Assignment America.” (This week, they chose the National Dog Agility Championships in Sunbury, Ohio.)
The high viewer turnout for “Idol,” which is on tonight, cannot solely be explained by technological advances or a regression in human nature. It cannot be a coincidence that television voting rights arose so soon after the 2000 election left slightly more than half the voting population feeling cheated. Those who didn’t go to the polls and fear that their abstention inadvertently made possible the invasion of Iraq may feel even worse. “Idol” could be a displacement ritual: a psychological release that allows people to vote — and even vote often — in a contest that has no dangerous or even lasting consequences. (Even losers win out in the end: both Mr. Gore and Jennifer Hudson ended up on the Oscar stage.)
Maybe the reason that more people didn’t turn out for the 2004 presidential race, despite the closeness of the tally four years earlier, is that they were still in denial and distracted by “American Idol.”
Hat tip: Chris Judd
—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well, she's right about one t
April 4, 2007 - 11:53 ET by winston smithWell, she's right about one thing anyway ------ Mr. Gore is a loser.
WOW, talk about twisting a st
April 4, 2007 - 12:04 ET by BEGRUNTWOW, talk about twisting a story for your moonbat audience......geeeezzzz. I agree with you Winston, Mr. Gore is a loser.
Folks, it's not teenage gir
April 4, 2007 - 12:06 ET by sarcasmoFolks, it's not teenage girls -- another NYT critic's being-clueless again. Here's what happened: Howard Stern & fans like me have discovered www.votefortheworst.com and now Sanjaya is a phenomenon. It's sorta like that William Hung guy, but with slightly more talent & way-funnier hair. None of us much care about the actual show, obviously, and most of us don't even watch, but lots of people have voted for the worst. I find it hilarious.
JMR
but lots of people have vo
April 4, 2007 - 12:51 ET by JDWbut lots of people have voted for the worst
First thing which comes to mind is the dem 'dead voter'... play book.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
I agree linking Idol to the 2
April 4, 2007 - 14:37 ET by waka wakaI agree linking Idol to the 2000 selection is quite a stretch. And that it's totally awesome that Sanjaya might win. I've hated Idol since the beginning.
"Uhhhh, look man. Uhhhh." Riley Martin rules!
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Bit of a stretch there, Aless
April 4, 2007 - 12:18 ET by rimskyBit of a stretch there, Alessandra.. bit of a stretch.
Sorry, Alessandra. It's a lit
April 4, 2007 - 12:26 ET by HypocriteHaterSorry, Alessandra. It's a little hard for me to believe that the same people who vote in the presidential elections are the same people who vote on American Idol.
According to liberals, the 20
April 4, 2007 - 12:29 ET by KC MulvilleAccording to liberals, the 2000 election marked the point where society stopped functioning. Before then, we lived in a pure meritocracy, where only the best rose to fame, and enjoyed the adulation of the unwashed masses.
Nah, that didn't happen in 2000. Society stopped being a pure meritocracy in 1983 when the Baltimore Orioles defeated the Philadelphia Phillies in the World Series. It's been atonal music ever since.
sometimes you don't connect
April 4, 2007 - 12:37 ET by Edhenrysometimes you don't connect related issues until someone desribes it. In this case, no connection before the article, no connection after the article. What a waste of paper.
"Pinch" is slowly destorying an American franchise. His father must be proud.
Wait A minute! Do I detect
April 4, 2007 - 12:55 ET by NasamikeWait A minute! Do I detect a little bias in your phrase: "...popular-but-fading Fox show "American Idol"...?" Although the show's ratings are lower than last year, the last time I checked the ratings (http://tv.zap2it.com) it is still number one in average viewers for the year! I wonder what does the editor really mean by "but-fading"?
I have been well trained in detecting bias with my daily visits to Rush, Drudge, MRC and News Busters over the years. Am I seeing some here? Or am I just being overly observant and too critical from a fan of "American Idol" Tell me readers!
And by the way, the NYT story was hysterical! Did you hear that there is a movie in the works about the 2000 election?
Mike
Escondido, CA
Idol "fading"
April 4, 2007 - 14:23 ET by exLibThat phrase stood out to me too.
All I know is that it's got allot going for it
1 - If you have kids, especially young children. It's a show the whole family can watch together. There are fewer and fewer shows like this every year.
2 - Many teens love it, Teens fuel the music industry.
3 - Last year more contestants had successful careers than previous years.
I don't particularly like it much myself because it's Karaoke, but there are talented people on the show.
Had we direct elections Bill
April 4, 2007 - 13:24 ET by MidAmericaHad we direct elections Bill Clinton would have had to go into run-off elections.
Even though he is the smartest and most popular President of our time he never got to 50% of the popular vote in a three way race.
So if any group should feel cheated it would be the voters of the 90's. More than one-half of the voters rejected Clinton twice but they got him anyway.
Even though he is the smartes
April 4, 2007 - 13:32 ET by Darth DutchEven though he is the smartest and most popular President of our time
That is definitely up for debate...
Hey..... I read it in the pap
April 4, 2007 - 13:36 ET by MidAmericaHey..... I read it in the paper. It must be so.
You don't hear the press complaining about that
April 4, 2007 - 14:29 ET by exLibIf I didn't look it up myself I would never have know.
More people voted AGAINST Clinton that voted for him, yet he was so loved and united this country in to one country that loved everything he did, especially when that nasty GOP led Congress tried to "frame" him for just having a little "fun" in the White House. Purely a "Personal Matter" Then he became REALLY POPULAR, like 90% approval or something if you believe the news polls that came out at the time.
Amazing how the media can influence people's perception of reality.
Good Questions Mid America.
It cannot be a coincidence th
April 4, 2007 - 13:30 ET by Darth DutchIt cannot be a coincidence that television voting rights arose so soon after the 2000 election left slightly more than half the voting population feeling cheated.
I wonder - if Al Gore had won and Bush had lost in 2000, would the NYT show as great a concern of the result of the election since, by their own reasoning, slightly less than half of the voting population would have felt cheated?
Dutch
Alessandra Stanley is so stup
April 4, 2007 - 14:30 ET by TEAlessandra Stanley is so stupid that a few years ago in her New York Times fawning tribute to Bill Maher, Stanley actually called the earth worshipping socialist Maher a "libertarian". Can Stanley get any more stupid?
I don't see how this guy Pi
April 4, 2007 - 17:31 ET by radiofitz34I don't see how this guy Pinch even came to the conclusion that this was out of frustration about voting in the 2000 election. I mean after getting bombarded with ridiculous reality shows during that time and even up to the present, THAT'S why American Idol was a hit. It was (and still is) a talent show.
Salzberger should check his tea leaves to see if he had something stronger in there. I never did care for these reality shows in the first place. And again that's why Idol is popular.
That's one of the dumbest pre
April 4, 2007 - 18:59 ET by balboaThat's one of the dumbest premises I've ever heard for a TV show's popularity.
STOP THE PRESSES!Balboa agr
April 4, 2007 - 19:12 ET by MightyMouthSTOP THE PRESSES!
Balboa agrees with Mr. Scheffield! Mark the calander!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Relish the moment! I'm sure i
April 4, 2007 - 20:17 ET by balboaRelish the moment! I'm sure it won't last... ;-)
Simon Cowell is a BRILLIANT
April 4, 2007 - 22:59 ET by upcountrywaterSimon Cowell is a BRILLIANT business man, guys like him make America Great.
Terrible capitalist that man
April 4, 2007 - 23:03 ET by bigtimerTerrible capitalist that man Cowell!
Just terrible!
How dare he!