Our president seems very opposed to timetables. Well, not seems, he is very opposed. Except I came across a couple of quotes.
George W. Bush, 4/9/99: “Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is.”
George W. Bush, 6/5/99: “I think it’s also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.”
[ed. note: article originally ran in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer on 6/5/99]
Any guesses as to what led to his change of opinion?














Comments Policy
And all the Leftists in the w
April 5, 2007 - 09:50 ET by UnsaneAnd all the Leftists in the world, like yourself, favored intervention in a civil war that would not serve America's interests (other than showing up the rotting EU).
What may have changed that? Let's see here...the fact that it is NOT a good idea to tell the enemy when you intend to leave? Of course, I AM talking to a Leftist whose vision of the United States is of a whiny, toothless, powerless nation that defers ALL foreign policy decisions to the Champs Elysees and Tiananmen Square; a nation that instead coddles, spoils, and nannies its entire population into oblivion.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
There you go again Unsane.
April 5, 2007 - 20:17 ET by WhichWingThere you go again Unsane. Here's my opinion. Bush is a hypocrite. When he is talking about Clinton and Kosovo he thinks timetables are a good thing, but when its him in Iraq, they are not.
Do you disagree with my assessment?
Yes. For one thing, Clinton
April 5, 2007 - 20:24 ET by UnsaneYes. For one thing, Clinton ALWAYS talked in terms of timetables for all the Balkan operations (and then clearly broke them). And back then, most timetables meant the turning over of operations to our inept friends in the rotting EU so that they could continue what the United States started, even though I would maintain that the United States was better off not intervening in the Balkans as that did not serve the interests of the United States.
Tell me, who would follow on in Iraq after the United States pulled out? Syria? Iran?
You DO NOT WANT TO TELL YOUR ENEMIES WHEN YOU ARE LEAVING.
You may paint me as a blind Bush supporter all day long, but your desire to paint me with that brush is only deluding yourself. I have my political principles, quite a few of which Bush is not backing.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
I have painted you as nothi
April 5, 2007 - 20:46 ET by WhichWingI have painted you as nothing. I posted two quotes from Bush that directly contradict what he has been saying of late, you took it upon yourself to go off on a rant. And again, you did all this without addressing the original point of the thread. Do you think that Bush is being hypocritical by saying timetables are good for Clinton and bad for him?
Read the very first sentence
April 5, 2007 - 21:12 ET by UnsaneRead the very first sentence of my original response, if that won't severely strain you eyes.
Bush is not, I repeat (as your literacy needs work) NOT a hypocrite. For one thing, Clinton was the one living and dying by timetables, and Bush never has.
Name one timetable Bush has set.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
How about you read the quot
April 5, 2007 - 21:24 ET by WhichWingHow about you read the quotes I posted. Why was he all for timetables then, and not now?????????????????????????????????????
TWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. COM
April 5, 2007 - 21:46 ET by TexasOptimistTWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
George W. Bush is not a conservative, but I still support his presidency. I'd rather have him as president than ANY of the Democrats.
Merry Christmas 2007.
I read your quotes. I respo
April 5, 2007 - 22:34 ET by UnsaneI read your quotes. I responded to them. It is not my fault that you are doing everything in your power to be as obtuse as possible.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
You are right, how could I
April 6, 2007 - 01:31 ET by WhichWingYou are right, how could I possibly expect you to be honest enough to say that his actions contradict his statements.
How can I expect you to be in
April 6, 2007 - 09:44 ET by UnsaneHow can I expect you to be intellectually honest enough to admit that the then-governor of TX was responding to a President who did NOTHING but set timetables, and that both situations were quite different?
But then, I am talking to an adolescent who hates the idea of the United States being a superpower, who desperately wants it turned into a whiny, toothless, powerless Nanny State...
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
My mistake, I misread the q
April 6, 2007 - 18:12 ET by WhichWingMy mistake, I misread the quote by George W. Bush. I didn't see the part where he said "except for certain situations" or "in most cases."
Well, that's what happens whe
April 6, 2007 - 22:46 ET by UnsaneWell, that's what happens when you rip quotes from papers and refuse to look at them in context, all because you hate Bush because he is NOT a coddling babysitter as you demand Presidents be, you being a good Leftist.
I bet you would make a great cult leader. Just do that with one or two quotes from the Bible and you will be set!
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Missing....
April 7, 2007 - 03:50 ET by Timothy HAnd I missed the part wher the then-governor said that this should be the case in any situation other than the one that was currently being discussed.
I also missed the part where he favored pulling out of Kosovo and leaving it to Milosovech's supporters.
I also missed the part where Bush has ever set a deadline for withdrawl from Iraq, unlike Clinton, who told us (I was there) that we would be home by Christmas, and then left us there.
I also missed the announcement of the nations or organizations that intend on taking over for us when we leave Iraq, much as the EU was to take over if we left Kosovo.
The only thing I find really hypocritical is the fact that you and other leftist here and elsewhere scream for timetables in Iraq, but never peep about Germany and Japan (62 years and running), Korea (54 years and running) or Kosovo (12 years and running).
Where is your outrage, WhichWing? Your responses and post effectively mean that you believe all situations to be equal, so where is your outrage over the lack of timetables? Or are you just a hypocrite?
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -
Yes of course Timothy H
April 9, 2007 - 11:10 ET by SportPoliticsYes of course Timothy H, so many here cut to the quick and make the liberal flee so much better than I do. I'll answer for chicken libble.
!!! (they always start with extra emotion) I was talking about Bush and failure to keep his promise about timetables after he lied us into a quagmire we cannot win that made us less safe and our enemy stronger, our economy weaker, our military exhausted and incapable of defending the homeland, and thousands of children unable to have both parents at home raising them, and tens of thousands of mentally disturbed returning discouraged and bewildered kids who are dropping out like flies,and can't even speak out since our 1st amendment rights are gone !!! And don't you dare claim I said any of this, because I'll deny it.
Name one timetable Bush has
April 9, 2007 - 20:47 ET by BlameTheMediaName one timetable Bush has set.
That's just not even valid since WW isn't making the argument that Bushie set timetables. so frustrating. read what's there instead of reading your own crap into it.
No you didn't WhichWing
April 9, 2007 - 10:49 ET by SportPoliticsWhichWing, the first falseline you have of Bush up there is something he has already addressed, repeatedly. The exit strategy is training the Iraqi forces up to speed and slowly allowing them to take over operations against the terrorist insurgency.
That's the exit strategy. It has been stated endlessly, and liberals still claim there isn't one.
On your second complaint, the thing that has changed, other than what Unsane pointed out ( indicating no support from the EU in this case ) is the nature of this insurgency, which is drawing a major amount of it's strength from outside the nation of Iraq, and from terrorists with a pan arabia vision, therefore announcing a timetable is not correct in this case, noone to takeover the operations and many regional and ultraregional players mucking up the works.
A timetable CAN be announced, once enough control over the insurgency is established. Prior to that, a timetable is a declaration of defeat.
In other words, the security of Iraq cannot be handled currently by the Iraqi forces alone, and it appears that there isn't a date certain where that indication of control is will be stout enough that confidence in leaving on a timed basis is reasonable considering the value of the staying power in allowing the 30 years oppressed, twice abandoned,and still shakey on their feet populace to regain a measure of confidence in the ultimate conclusion to their efforts.
A timetable in this case, loses hearts and minds, to a very large degree, and this is indeed a unique situation, not foreseen in 1999, not predicted even as the war ensued, or in the immediate aftermath.
Doesn't an insurgency take 8-10 years to quell, at least by historical standards ? So, there appears to be a sort of timetable, but the quivering kneed leftists likely prevent the already known conditions and length of stay - discussed enough that people have heard it several times, a very dangerous politcal card to openly profess here in liberal crybaby land.
I think that's the truth.
I also think the Iraqi forces are coming online, in a much beter way, because the crybaby lib press hasn't been whining about it lately. Youknow when the lib press isn't whining about something, it's going well.
I also saw a lib press report about power being handed over to the Iraqi NG in some big name Iraq city just yesterday. They characterized it as a "homegrown celebration" and an arrogant styled "booting" of the coalition, as if it was a victory agains the USA.
LOL - That was indicative of much more than just the Iraqi forces doing well, but that change in the newspeak lib msm angle and tempo of the story told me this: Even the Bush hating press has confidence in that Iraqi battalion, because they no longer whined that they were poorly trained and incapable, but had to recede to the hate Bush and the USA point of "booting the dang coalition fromthe city with cheers"... ( kinda like the fantasy of "taking back the White House", or "taking our country back" that the massively overblown partisan traitor lying dems spew )
So, yeah there are indicators, and that's a good one, seeing how the babbling lib press does their hate America angle...
SP...You gotta admit ww has a
April 9, 2007 - 10:56 ET by Clear thinkerSP...
You gotta admit ww has all the leftist talking points down cold.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Yes Clear thinker
April 9, 2007 - 11:34 ET by SportPoliticsHe isn't as bad as the rest though, or most, IMO. He might actually be trying, or be authentic.
Ok Clear Thinker, I was definitely wrong
April 9, 2007 - 18:29 ET by SportPoliticsOk Clear Thinker, I was definitely wrong, and you were exactly correct.
It's a ww loser without even an internal mental formation to back up the mind numbed pelolib robot zombie spit bubble blinky spew. It's bad, same bat guano, same bottom of the barrel.
I know, you tried to warn me.
And so many of the thoughts
April 9, 2007 - 20:48 ET by BlameTheMediaAnd so many of the thoughts here are soooo original. If it weren't for Rush and Ann you guys wouldn't know what to say half the time. (Not all of you, just most)
outside?
April 9, 2007 - 20:52 ET by misterbillYa wanna come outside and say that pilgrim??
See I use John Wayne too! You really should see it in person!
Irony
April 13, 2007 - 16:12 ET by UnsaneThis coming from someone so intensely wedded to Leftist orthodoxy, which cannot and will not at ANY cost tolerate any differences of opinion.
I can certainly understand why you fear Mr. Limbaugh (who has 20 million listeners and opened the floodgates of AM radio to countless imitators, some good, some mediocre), but why do you fear such a horrific writer like Ann Coulter? Have you even bothered trying to listen to one of Limbaugh's shows or read one of Coulter's books?
It is always amusing to me to hear Leftists whine about how Rightists don't think for themselves...when in truth, if they bothered looking (they won't, out of total fear), they would see that there are many differences of opinion within the strictures of conservatism that are being fiercely debated even now. I should know. Many principles I adhere to are repugnant to quite a few on the Right.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Unsane...That is what the lef
April 5, 2007 - 22:01 ET by bigtimerUnsane...
That is what the leftist little pointy headed trolls do here all the time, try to paint us all with one broad stroke...
Most know very well we do not support every little thing President Bush has done...but he has not, nor do I think he ever will back down from the terrorists..
Something the little pinheads just can't seem to wrap their empty ungrateful minds around.
Twits at their best.
Go ahead and point out wher
April 6, 2007 - 01:42 ET by WhichWingGo ahead and point out where I said you supported every little thing President Bush has done. I didn't address the post to anyone. You are the ones that feel the need to try to explain away the obvious difference in his words and his actions.
Intellectual honesty and read
April 6, 2007 - 09:46 ET by UnsaneIntellectual honesty and reading comprehension on your part will go a long way.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
The Kosovo endeavors were COM
April 5, 2007 - 21:45 ET by TexasOptimistThe Kosovo endeavors were COMPLETELY different from the US endeavors in Afghanistan and Iraq. If the U.S. had set up a timetable in Kosovo, chances were good that it WOULDN'T lead to future destablistation. However, if the U.S. signaled a timetable in Iraq, it could end up creating a HUGE problem. If the U.S. announced a timetable, the insurgents could easily adopt a "rope-a-dope" strategy, biding their time until the U.S. forces left Iraq. Then what would happen? ALL HELL WOULD BREAK LOOSE.
George W. Bush is not a conservative, but I still support his presidency. I'd rather have him as president than ANY of the Democrats.
Merry Christmas 2007.
Additionally, as WW refuses t
April 5, 2007 - 22:37 ET by UnsaneAdditionally, as WW refuses to understand, the rotting EU could have stepped in and taken care of the Bosnia/Kosovo issues. (But then, we had been asking them to do that for years, and the whole while, they dithered and whined and otherwise did NOTHING that entire time.) So a timetable would not hve hurt us on that score, they way it would in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
What needs to happen in Ira
April 6, 2007 - 01:44 ET by WhichWingWhat needs to happen in Iraq in order for you to be comfortable calling it a victory?
Eliminate the major Jihadist
April 6, 2007 - 01:52 ET by NL207Eliminate the major Jihadist influences.
(1) Convert 12,000 Al Qaeda fighters to rotting corpses.
(2) Kill Moqtada Al Sadr and dissolve the Mahdi Army.
(3) Leave an Iraqi government strong enough to keep domestic order and in particlar, keep out the Jihadists, but weak enough as to be no threat to its neighbors.
3 is gonna take an awfully
April 6, 2007 - 02:27 ET by sarcasmo3 is gonna take an awfully big, awfully strong one (which means in effect a projected threat to neighbors, just like with Saddam's government) because Iraq is still three countries, with plenty of scores to settle among themselves... Kurdistan is likely to be the only one of the 3 that likes us at all. Shiastan is likely to have continued religious/tribal ties to Iran's dictatorship, and they're likely to hate America for the foreseeable future. Sunnistan is likely to have continued similar ties to the various Sunni dictatorships in the area, such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia, and also likely to hate America for the foreseeable future.
JMR
Maybe the Iraqis need to form
April 6, 2007 - 03:55 ET by NL207Maybe the Iraqis need to form a Fedralized system of government where its states have semi autonomous rule similar to what the CSA envisioned here or what our national government was like in 1800. Something like that might work for them. Its certainly better than any of, Saddam, a Sunni theocracy or a Shia theocracy.
Swiss style cantons MIGHT w
April 6, 2007 - 10:01 ET by sarcasmoSwiss style cantons MIGHT work, but I think they're too used to an all-powerful government in capital city controlling all aspects of life for that kind of idea to actually take root, which is why I propose 3 separate countries. Your point brings to mind a Jay Leno (and possibly others) joke from early on in the conflict when they were trying to figure out how to draft a constitution: "They could just use the US Constitution, since we're not using it anymore."
JMR
It will be a victory when Ira
April 6, 2007 - 03:46 ET by Conservative VoiceIt will be a victory when Iran is no longer a threat
Careful, CV. You are respon
April 6, 2007 - 09:51 ET by UnsaneCareful, CV. You are responding to WhichWing, who is infinitely more concerned for America's popularity around the world rather than its interests and national security. He also craves the idea of a pathetically weakened America...after all, if we stick to the policy of pre-emption, he says it is only a matter of time before the United States is looked at like Hitler's Germany.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
I'm a little tired of you d
April 6, 2007 - 18:03 ET by WhichWingI'm a little tired of you deciding my views and opinions for me. Take a read through this post. Why is it that the others can have a civil discusion with each other and you are sitting here attacking me personally?
So, you want America to be
April 6, 2007 - 18:07 ET by Free StinkerSo, you want America to be Safe & Strong ?
Yes, but we have an apparen
April 6, 2007 - 18:14 ET by WhichWingYes, but we have an apparent disagreement in how to achieve that.
It would seem so.Should we
April 6, 2007 - 18:26 ET by Free StinkerIt would seem so.
Should we leave Iraq (much like we abandoned Afghanistan in 1989 when the Soviets pulled out) and let it become a haven for terrorists?
Did you notice that after the Iraq War, Lybia started to straighten up, Syria pulled out of Lebanon, and Egypt and Saudi Arabia held elections. None of this is perfect or ideal by any means, but it is better than we had before, and I'd prefer the fight was over there, not in the aisle of a 757.
Isn't Iraq breeding terrori
April 6, 2007 - 22:06 ET by WhichWingIsn't Iraq breeding terrorists at a much faster rate than it did before? Unsane will piss and moan all day long that I want to have a "whiny, toothless, blah, blah, blah nation." But he doesn't understand, or refuses to understand, that creating more enemies than you kill is not a recipe for victory. I think he has also mistaken diplomacy for appeasement.
In all honesty, I don't have an answer for Iraq. I do think we need to get out, but I am fully aware that we can't just pick up and leave. We created the chaos in that country, and we should help to correct it. How do we do that? I do not know.
Typical liberal
April 6, 2007 - 22:46 ET by gfrrmanThe poster child of the Democrat/liberal party. ..."I don't like what's happening, but I don't have ANY answers or a plan".. But I will stand in the corner and bitch and moan and groan like a 5 yr old and have a g'damn hissy fit and blame everbody else for not coming up with a solution!! If you don't have anything that would help besides "I don't know", maybe you just need to just STFU!!!! You offer NOTHING!!!!, NADA, ZILCH, ZERO!!
"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
gfrrman
April 9, 2007 - 08:02 ET by SportPoliticsBut it's worse than that. He also knows " we have to get out".
I just read that some US state had to send another load of National Guard to the Balkans. Do we "have to get out" of there ?
Do we "have to get out" of Afghanistan ?
Do we "have to get out " of the Korean peninsula ?
Guess not, really. We can keep sending replacement troops to Clinton's unsettled balkans war area, forever, and never will a lib ever claim slick willie's nightmare xtian murder spree for AQ muzzies has to end. That was great how their court case utterly failed and Milosevich died in prison, after successfully defending himself against all the false charges. Wow, the wrong side of the war, it's still costing us troops, and never does the msm or a lib complain. That whole area is a disaster.
Earlier some lib gave a dire warning that Iran has a couple hundred thousand troops,and is a real military, not to be reckoned with by the USA since we're stretched so thin.
Uhh, we have like 2.3 million total all told. Yeah,so a couple hundred thousand is a real a** kicker, like Saddam, who had 150,000 iraq guard, and 300,000 more paid fighters.
We're all gonna die, the libs said so.
What you miserably fail to un
April 6, 2007 - 23:03 ET by UnsaneWhat you miserably fail to understand is the following:
1) If the crime rate in Houston goes up, I won't expect to see Bill White get on TV and say "I am reducing our police force by half because having a police force makes more criminals". That is, if he wants to continue to be mayor of Houston.
2) If fires and arson becomes a problem, I won't likewise expect Mr. White to say "To reduce the threat of fires, I am shutting down half of the fire stations permanently. That is, once again, if he wants to continue to be the mayor of Houston.
3) Did the ranks of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union swell after the deployment of Pershings and GLCMs to Europe in 1983?
4) Did the Nazi Party gain more members after D-day?
5) Is there a massive South Korean wing of the Korean Worker's Party that is swelling in ranks due to U.S. forces being there?
6) I visited Japan last year and was treated with extreme kindness by the Japanese people. Mind explaining why that was?
You are going to have to face cold, hard reality one day. As long as the United States exists, someone will harbor a grudge against it. In short, the only way we will not have enemies of any kind is if we just wake up tomorrow and end the United States of America. You, WhichWing, are close to being 231 years too late.
"We created the chaos in that country" - Sure, and life was WONDERFUL under Saddam Hussein, wasn't it, WW? Of course it was! Nothing Bad Ever Happens On The Left, according to WW.
In closing, I recommend you read the novel Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein. If only to read one specific scene:
In the world of this novel, every high school student had to take a course called History and Moral Philosophy. Every student had to take it, but none ever had to pass. On the final day of the course, the teacher heard this whine from a student: "My mother told me that violence doesn't solve anything." Without hesitation, the teacher said, "The citizens of Carthage would very much appreciate those views. Why doesn't she go there and tell them? Better yet, you go tell them."
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
To add, the terrorists, like
April 6, 2007 - 23:51 ET by Conservative VoiceTo add, the terrorists, like all bullies, understand strength. If you negotiate they will see it as weakness and demand more. He seems to forget that we were minding our business on 9-11. But if you show strength then and only then you gain respect.
I remember a father telling his daughter no, and then counting to 3. She didn't stop, so he said "I said No" and proceeded to count to 3. He did this over and over again, until he gave up. What did the girl learn? That her dad can count and all she has to do is be more patient and then be able to do whatever she wants. Diplomants with no backbone to follow through on a threat accomplish the same thing. Of course to liberals who think feelings and self worth is more important than obedience, counting to 3 works.
That is why I loved John Bolt
April 7, 2007 - 00:09 ET by bigtimerThat is why I loved John Bolton CV.
I wished of all people in this world he was the one who would run for President.
I know it would never work, he isn't PC at all, he isn't a pretty boy or whatever this world thinks we need anymore, he just tells it like it is in plain simple ENGLISH...he would be my man...period.
John Bolton for VP now there
April 7, 2007 - 00:27 ET by Conservative VoiceJohn Bolton for VP now there is a ticket :)
CV,Well... now... no... I sai
April 7, 2007 - 00:34 ET by bigtimerCV,
Well... now... no... I said President!
I know darn well it is a dream ticket, so I will not even settle for VICE!
Laughing I hope you know...
Happy Easter to you CV...and all those you hold dear.
I got to get out of here...later.
How do we do that? Keep tr
April 6, 2007 - 23:12 ET by Free StinkerHow do we do that?
Keep traing the Iraqi Army & Police. Get more agressive in smacking down terrorists. Bomb everywhere Armini-Jihad is sleeping over in Iran. Same thing for the thug, Ass-ad, in Damascus
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
Free...Couldn't agree more!Ge
April 6, 2007 - 23:16 ET by bigtimerFree...
Couldn't agree more!
Geesh little brother I am getting to love you more and more.
You may even get invited to come back home..that is after you find that lottery ticket you misplaced!
LOL!
Happy Easter
Drinking & Posting
April 6, 2007 - 23:27 ET by Free StinkerYou may even get invited to come back home
And you lecture Blonde about not Drinking & Posting ? :-p
Free..What the heck are you t
April 6, 2007 - 23:33 ET by bigtimerFree..
What the heck are you talking about?
Dang!
Invitation rescinded!
Hurt my feelings...I forgot you followed B around like a lost puppy dog.
My bad.
Still sending you and yours a Happy Easter.
I forgot you followed B aroun
April 7, 2007 - 15:56 ET by Free StinkerI forgot you followed B around like a lost puppy dog.
Next thing, you're going to call me a Liberal.
Geez Free...In the first plac
April 7, 2007 - 16:03 ET by bigtimerGeez Free...
In the first place I didn't call you anything, in the second place I was agreeing with your great post above to start with, in the third place I was joking about the oldest sibling thing we had going on months and months back, and you know it....remember, you took me of being a friend list over that or some such...
Goodness gracious...lighten up, quit trying to pick a fight still today...
Once again, Happy Easter...and I mean that.
Enough already.
Did I mention that Balboa i
April 8, 2007 - 08:04 ET by Free StinkerDid I mention that Balboa is on my Buddy List ?
Ah, diplomacy. Good to see
April 6, 2007 - 23:15 ET by UnsaneAh, diplomacy. Good to see you have vested so much faith in it! Too damn bad its record in history is so piss-poor, especially when not teamed with things like MASSIVE VIOLENCE, the imminent threat thereof, and VICTORY.
Let me give you a great example of how I would do diplomacy. Let us use the recent captivity of the British sailors as an example. I am not a Brit, nor am I a Foreign Minister, but I'll just play one on NB.
Negotiations would be quite short. I would enter the room and would say, "You know what to do. Hand over the sailors and nobody gets hurt." Of course, the Iranians would make their statement; except unlike most diplomats, who repeat their positions ad nauseum (arms control negotiations were painful in that regard especially), I'd get up and leave.
I would then hit the mikes and the waiting media outside, and have the shortest press conference in history, consisting of three little words, which spark the military operation: "Sorry. We Tried."
Bombs begin falling and a rescue operation commences.
The next day, after I have gotten what I wanted, I begin another press conference with "Now that they know I am serious..."
Look at what Reagan did. In October 1986, when Gorbachev made lousy offers to him (begging Reagan to put an end to SDI), he got up and left the Reykjavik summit. I remember this well. The world was aghast at why Reagan would do such a thing. Well, for one thing, he was in a position of strength. Why cave to The Evil Empire when he didn't have to? BUT, as a result of that confrontation, and the military buildup in Europe and elsewhere, and the deployment of the Pershing 2s and GLCMs in the face of whiny Leftist opposition (who never dared ask themselves why the Soviets couldn't withdraw their SS-20s from the European theater), a better deal was on tap in late 1987 in Washington, as both sides agreed to eliminate an entire class of nuclear weapons.
When you desire peace, you don't just babble about how much you want peace. You arm to protect it. As Vegetius once said, "If you desire peace, prepare for war." Sad but true, and I am, as I was once described, "the ultimate realist".
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Good job Unsane
April 9, 2007 - 08:31 ET by SportPoliticsGood job Unsane. Appreciated that outline of actions.
It made me realize something. The libs have this whole it takes two to tango thing, and the zero tolerance,and the no finger pointing and saying bang bang, and the expelling the fighting kids...
But in all that, the libs always have mommie or big lib NEA government around to break up the fight and settle it all, then enforce the ensuing split of the parties in the classroom for the rest of the year, or to their separate rooms at home. etc.
In the big bad world, there is no mommie or government lib funded teacher to come to the rescue, and tower over the scuttling nations, knocking them or grabbing them by the ear and separating them.
It's more like a permanent unsupervised playground situation, with no parents or teachers around, ever. Or latchkey kids at home with the cheetos and only one playstation unattended by anyone.
Maybe I should say it's more like a bunch of guys at a bowling alley with plenty of beer. A fights gonna break out sooner or later, but when fights break out against nations, who is the big bad police, or the mommie lib government ?
I think that's why the libs want the UN to rule the world so badly. They'ed have a new mommie to make the kids stop fighting,they think.
WhichWing.....
April 7, 2007 - 02:43 ET by Timothy HWhichWing....
Don't you get it? These terrorists aren't the result of our actions in Iraq, or anywhere else in the world. They are the result of an ideological difference. Are you really trying to say that we caused their radicalization, and as the result of a free Iraq, there are more terrorists?
Well, you would be right. I am not joking here, nor am I in agreement with anything else you have said. But on this one point, you are correct.
You asked earlier what Victory would be to us? Well, I can't speak for my friend Unsane, but I'm guessin he feels very near to the way I do. Let me give explaining this to you a shot.
I said previously that you were correct in the notion that we caused the radicalization of many of these new terrorists. But we view this in very different terms. Yes, our actions brought about an increase in the attempt to radicalize new islamists, but no for the reasons you suggest. Fear is the true reason. They fear the Hope that we bring with us, and ultimately, they are trying to recruit more in the hopes of stifling that hope.
What is Victory? Victory is liberty. Victory is Hope. And these new terrorists are an indication that the untimate victory is cycling on. Why are these Terrorists recruiting so hard? Because hope is their greatest enemy. Islam may be a religion of peace, related to Judaism and Christianity. But Radical Islam is a tool of oppression. They think differently than we do. They do not want what we want. We can give them everything they ask, and they will cheer, and then start plotting our death. We can leave the middle east, and they will cheer, and start plotting to attack us here. The basis for all of this is the difference between the ideologies. We wish to advance the world, regardless of race, religion, etc. They seek to kill those who do not believe as they do. Nothing we offer them, short of conversion to Islam (but even that has it's problems, as the constant Shiah/Sunni fighting is evidence of.), will appease them. Because we stand for everyhting they don't. Tolerance, Liberty, Prosperity.....and most of all Hope.
The Statue of Liberty is more than just a monument. It is a symbol. It is an Idea. Her torch is a beacon, a shining light, meant to guide the world through the fog of tyranny, subjegation and oppression and toward a better way of life. Nothing strikes more fear into the core of the fundamentalists hearts than her visage. Because hope is truest weapon against oppression. She is a symbol of hope the world over. Every one of our troops carries her light with them.
This is why they fear us. This is why they fear our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. They fear that if her light reachs this place, and starts to spead to the Syrian, Iranian, Jordanian, Saudi, and other arab peoples, that hope will spread. And those with hope are far less easily oppressed. That Light...That hope, is the seed of liberty. And the Radical Islamists fear nothing more. Hope is the beginning of liberty.
This is why leaving is wrong. This is why we have never left Korea, Japan, and Germany. Because Lady Liberty's light shines through us. Look at Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia. Look what her light has done. But it doesn't happen overnight. It doesn't happen on a scheduled timeline. Over sixty years have gone by since the end of World War II, and we are still seeing the fruit of our efforts blooming in Asia and Europe today. And more will bloom tomorrow. This is what we strive for in the middle east. This is what we work for. To make true Jeffersons words, "that all men were created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
Lady Liberty is why they hate us. She is why they fear us. And the only way to silence her is to silence us, to kill us. To try and remove that symbol of hope, to extinguish her spark from the hearts of those they wish to oppress. We could leave Iraq tomorrow, and they would celebrate their victory, and then use that victory to recruit even more terrorists to come here and work towards a final victory.
And, regardless of what the Media, who have moved closer and closer to becoming active propagandists for dictators, despots and oppressors in general, may print, we are winning this battle. I have two brothers currently in Iraq. Our soldiers, who are far more reliable and have far more invested than some socialist scribe with an axe to grind at the local AnyMetro Herald, tell us of continued greeting and attempted giftings in the street by appreciative Iraqis. The seeds have been planted, and these fundamentalists want to spoil the crop by displacing our troops before the Lady's Torch starts to shine in the shadows of the surrounding nations.
But for now, the Matron of Freedom bears down to fend off the newest waves of oppression and smiles a little at their folly. When left to her work, she and her infantry have never failed.
-"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It is something that must be fought for, protected, and passed on to them to do the same." Ronald Reagan-
Timothy H...WOW!You said it a
April 7, 2007 - 16:28 ET by bigtimerTimothy H...
WOW!
You said it all so beautifully.
Thank you.
I am copying this and passing it on to those who will enjoy it...and those who need to learn some things in my opinion that you put so well into words and wrote...for others to learn from.
Thank you once again.
May your brothers stay safe.
May all of those serving have a great Easter if possible...you have my gratitude.
Appreciated
April 8, 2007 - 03:36 ET by Timothy HThanks for the kind words, BT. Both about the post, and my brothers. It is appreciated.
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -
Timothy H - A second wow--
April 7, 2007 - 16:40 ET by misterbillTimothy H - A second wow--I hope the editors of our site release your words to as much of the world as possible. You have encapsulated all that America means to me. Yes, there is a stiff price to pay and if you are one of the families that pays that price you have the right to question the steepness of that price, but then you move forward. America does not shy away from confrontation. We turn the other cheek, but once. We cannot let our country fall into the hands of a Pelosi and her cringing cowardly cohorts. We cannot let people like McCain and Murtha who have lost their courage in their old age, give our country away or appease tyrants and terrorists. Thank you for your essay. It is beautiful. It is impassioned, moving and thank God, true! May God bless you and your brothers and family. My thanks to them for being true Americans and defending me and mine!
Misterbill
Where ’s the coward that would not dare to fight for such a land?
Sir Walter Scott
Apppreciation part II
April 8, 2007 - 03:44 ET by Timothy HThank you for the kind words, misterbill. The post was from the bottom of my heart and the passions I have for our country. It must be realized that this war will not end soon, nor will it end in Iraq. This war is about fundamentalist who fear us and our way of life, and want to kill us before it spreads any further. My greatest regret for this President is that, though he does understand this, he hasn't the politcal courage, after the Viet-Nam style media beating he has taken, to orate this himself.
And thank you for the kind words for my brothers' and my service. It is appreciated.
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -
I'll give you a third "
April 7, 2007 - 17:24 ET by WhichWingI'll give you a third "wow." Was a well crafted post. I will only disagree a little bit. I don't think they hate that we have freedom in our own nation. I think that they despise the notion we have that we are in charge of spreading western styles of government throughout the world. (Even if they truly would benefit from it.)
But again, and honestly, a great post on your part.
Appreciation: part III
April 8, 2007 - 03:53 ET by Timothy HThank you, as well, WhichWing, for the compliment. From what you are saying, you don't disagree at all. Our style of government is just part of that light, my friend. It is the cement of the foundation of Freedom and Hope. But they wouldn't benefit from it any more than Sheikh Mansur, al-Zarqawi, etc...have. They don't want freedom, They want to oppress. Democracy has a way of kicking oppression right in the a**. They do hate us because we are free.....and because we are spreading that freedom around the world.
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -
Appreciation Part III: Clarification
April 8, 2007 - 05:26 ET by Timothy HI wanted to make what I am tryin to say here clear. What I am saying is that, while they may not hate our freedom (a sentiment I would contest, but for the sake of argument, I will not at this time.), it is the root of what they DO hate. They hate what that freedom means, and what it represents to the rest of the world. It shows the oppressed that a better way IS possible. WE threw of the shackles of oppression 231 years ago, and have been spreading our brand of freedom ever since. Our nation, and her story, are a symbol of hope worldwide. That is what those who wish to oppress hate. As I said above, it is the light of hope that they hate and fear most.
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -
I like the idea of spreadin
April 8, 2007 - 06:26 ET by WhichWingI like the idea of spreading democracy when they want us there. But, and I'm sure some will not believe this, not everyone wants what we have. Some want to live under the extreme rules of their religion. Some don't want what they perceive to be as a lack of morals. And I think its our refusal to understand that that has made us a few enemies. Now some places do look to us as a beacon of hope, no doubt about it. But there are others who fear our need to "spread the word." I would think that most nations would be happy once they get to the freedom, but the turmoil their country must endure along the way can be too much sometimes. I'm sure we had doubters in our own nation as we fought for freedom. But we started the revolt, not an invading nation.
What will it take for you to
April 8, 2007 - 12:02 ET by UnsaneWhat will it take for you to understand that the United States of America has enemies for the audacious act of existing?
And you say freedom is not precious enough to endure the turmoil along the way? What about Boston having its economy ground to a halt from the Boston Tea Party on, as the British closed the harbor? Or the fact that other segments of the fledgling U.S. economy weren't doing so well as the armies collided in various places throughout the original 13 states? What about the destruction being caused by both loyalists and patriots alike?
If the early Americans had that attitude, we'd still be British.
Exporting freedom and liberty throughout the world, in the long run, contributes more to world peace than you may believe. Name for me a time when two liberal democracies went to war against each other.
And as for your comments about how some want to live under extreme rules of religion and so forth...I find it very hard to believe that there are people out there who would willingly turn over their freedoms to anybody for any reason. Could it be that you are saying that people in one particular part of the world do not want the ability to choose whatever government they wish?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
You have misconstrued every
April 9, 2007 - 06:50 ET by WhichWingYou have misconstrued everything I said.
This was from that post, now read the ENTIRE sentence:
I would think that most nations would be happy once they get to the
freedom, but the turmoil their country must endure along the way can be
too much sometimes.
Read it again if necessary.
You said this:
I find it very hard to believe that there are people out there who
would willingly turn over their freedoms to anybody for any reason.
Believe it or not, there are people who are willing to do just that.
And this:
Could it be that you are saying that people in one particular part of
the world do not want the ability to choose whatever government they
wish?
I didn't say that, nor did I imply it.
WhichWing, such quick selective sexing down of your post
April 9, 2007 - 08:55 ET by SportPoliticsWhichWing, such quick selective sexing down of your post:
[But, and I'm sure some will not believe this, not everyone wants what we have. Some want to live under the extreme rules of their religion. Some don't want what they perceive to be as a lack of morals. And I think its our refusal to understand that that has made us a few enemies.]
Now how was Unsane's response not exactly indicative of what you said. I note in your 3 copy and pastes, you left out the above. Gee I wonder how you managed that...
We're you just all pissed off, or did I just hallucinate what I copy and pasted from your post,that you left out.
You know, you left that part above out when you whined back in a false rebuttal.
I just figured I had better say it 3 times as well, since you avoided your own words 3 times.
You're amazing.
Well, smart guy, I only cop
April 9, 2007 - 09:15 ET by WhichWingWell, smart guy, I only copied and pasted once from my own post (which can be found a couple of inches above.) I copied that particular sentence from the original post because it was clear that Unsane chose ignore the first half of the sentence.
I'll spell it out for you. The original statement was this:
I would think that most nations would be happy once they get to the
freedom, but the turmoil their country must endure along the way can be
too much sometimes.
Unsane said "And you say freedom is not precious enough to endure the turmoil along the way?" As if the whole statement read "The turmoil their country must endure along the way is too much."
Does that help you to understand why Unsane's response was not exactly indicative of what I said?
The other copy and pastes were from Unsane's comments, which I was responding too.
Looking back at it, I think "can seem like too much sometimes" would have been more appropriate.
I hope this has been helpful.
Helpful to you perhaps WhichWay
April 9, 2007 - 09:41 ET by SportPoliticsHelpful to you perhaps WhichWay ( 3 little quotelets in one fell swoop arguing idiot ), since you've proven yourself wrong again, taking from your same post I took from, and claiming there was some difference in what Unsane said without a distinction, and then finally caving into nothing at the end.
I get it, we'll just redact the part you conveniently left out ( the inconvenient truth about what you said that Unsane saw, you omitted, and I reminded you of) - and then, after you whine he misinterpreted, you'll try to correct me, but instead correct yourself, and post what you claim you wanted to say, but didn't, hopefully changing the meaning of one sentence to get out of it, but never addressing the one I copied that you wrote, because it makes your entire thrust clear and Unsane's response absolutely appropriate.
So, yeah it helped, you caved, and I am further convinced how spin and lies and anger and refusal to admit your stance once challenged is your stock in trade. You have a sort of "living post" thing going there, where seconds later what you wrote can suddenly take on new meaning, as you delete entire sentences, and change a word, here or there.
Super.
You truly are ridiculous.
April 9, 2007 - 18:21 ET by WhichWingYou truly are ridiculous. You act as if I'm misrepresenting my own statement by quoting one line of it for clarification. And the statement in question? It was right above, all you had to do was scroll up. Quit taking my words and statements and trying to twist them into your wet dream of a liberal mindset. Muddy the waters all you want, my words are there to be read.
Hey, Unsane
April 9, 2007 - 09:54 ET by SportPoliticsWhichWing is so brilliant, that he has figured out, that there are some people there, that don't want our freedom, they want to live under the strict controls of their religion ( we call those terrorists and insurgents and Al Qaeda ), and smarty WhichWing thinks we have made enemies by not understanding that there are those people over there.
ROFLMAO - YEAH BUDDY.
But, he really doesn't mean it, because he also said he would be ok if the people wanted us there. So he is arguing the entire lot, or at least the vast *liberal(sarc)* majority don't want us there. Yes, those nasty religious freaks are the majority "in Iraq", all those voters.....
LOL
Man if you break down a liberals babbling spew, you find out they have contradicted themselves so many times, it takes 20 minutes to find out all the instances of stupidity and contradiction in a few paragraphs.
It's actually an amazing skill, to be a spewbabbling liberal.
A real world test.
April 8, 2007 - 21:51 ET by Timothy HI'm not opposed to testing your theory in the real world. As a matter of fact, I think it would be great for the nation to test this theory in actually practice, and make a final decision about all of this. Let the Iraqis decide. Let them vote. Allow them to illustrate your point. Let there be a nationwide vote, conducted by the Swiss, as a nuetral observer. The vote would consist of two very specific choices. First choice: America should withdraw immediately. Second choice: America should stay and finish the job.
If the mass populous doesn't want us there, tan I would be more opposed to us being there than you are. Let their vote be considered in the decision to stay or leave. I'm not saying that Iraqis should decide American foreign policy, but what I am saying is that our government could make the decision to move forward, or to leave, based on the will of Iraq's people.
But, based on second-hand experience, I don't think this would end well for the anti-war side.
- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints -