CNN's Michael Ware Denies Heckling John McCain

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

CNN correspondent Michael Ware appeared on Monday's "American Morning" and gave a live report from Baghdad on Sen. John McCain's visit to the Iraqi capital. Host Soledad O'Brien asked him during the segment if he had, as suggested in Internet accounts, heckled the presidential hopeful:

SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: Let me ask you a question. There was a report that said you were heckling and you were laughing during the senator's press conference. Is that true?

WARE: "Well, let's bear in mind that this is a report that was leaked by an unnamed official, of some kind, to a blog, to somewhere on the Internet. No one is going to put their name forward. We certainly haven't heard Senator McCain say anything about it, or any of his staff have come forward to say anything about it.

I did not heckle the senator. Indeed, I didn't say a word. I didn't even ask a question. In fact, when I raised my hand to ask a question, the press conference abruptly ended. So, what I would suggest is that anyone who has any queries about whether I heckled, watch the videotape of the press conference -- Soledad.

O'Brien's question refers to a Drudge Report flash in which Ware was accused of heckling the Arizona Senator during a news conference on Sunday. CNN aired the first 4 minutes or so of this press conference (Fox News and MSNBC didn't cover the press conference at all). There was no indication of heckling or laughing of any kind during CNN's broadcast.

Before O'Brien asked this question, Ware had criticized McCain and the congressional delegation in his report.

MICHAEL WARE, CNN BAGHDAD CORRESPONDENT: There is the Republican congressional delegation here in Iraq. Essentially, they're here to view the impact of the surge, or the Baghdad security plan, and, essentially, to sell its merits.

To say that, yes, it is having an impact and to take that message home to an American people desperate to hear of signs of progress. Unfortunately, they chose a very poor way of displaying those signs of change and the signs of progress.

The fact that Senator McCain and a delegation can drive from the airport and walk around parts of Baghdad wrapped in a heavy security envelope is not new. Generals and American representatives have been doing such things throughout the war. Indeed, it's the old reinvented, as new. And is in no way a sign of the real progress of the surge, which the senators should be talking about.

A transcript of the full segment:

S. O'BRIEN: Let's begin for you this morning in the Middle East, where two prominent members of Congress are visiting there. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is in Beirut, Lebanon; she's planning a stop in Syria tomorrow. Senator John McCain is leading a Republican delegation in Iraq.

Senator McCain saying Americans aren't getting the full picture of what is going on in Iraq. He visited a Baghdad market yesterday. You can see from those shots there wearing a bulletproof vest, and surrounded by heavy security. Still, the senator says he sees improvement.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN, (R-AZ), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Things are better, and there are encouraging signs. I've been here many times over the years and never have I been able to drive from the airport and never have I been able to go out into the city as I was today.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O'BRIEN: CNN's Michael Ware is following the delegation's movements in Baghdad for us this morning. 

MICHAEL WARE, CNN BAGHDAD CORRESPONDENT: That's right. There is the Republican congressional delegation here in Iraq. Essentially, they're here to view the impact of the surge, or the Baghdad security plan, and, essentially, to sell its merits.

To say that, yes, it is having an impact and to take that message home to an American people desperate to hear of signs of progress. Unfortunately, they chose a very poor way of displaying those signs of change and the signs of progress.

The fact that Senator McCain and a delegation can drive from the airport and walk around parts of Baghdad wrapped in a heavy security envelope is not new. Generals and American representatives have been doing such things throughout the war. Indeed, it's the old reinvented, as new. And is in no way a sign of the real progress of the surge, which the senators should be talking about.

O'BRIEN: Let me ask you a question. There was a report that said you were heckling and you were laughing during the senator's press conference. Is that true?

 WARE: Well, let's bear in mind that this is a report that was leaked by an unnamed official, of some kind, to a blog, to somewhere on the Internet. No one is going to put their name forward. We certainly haven't heard Senator McCain say anything about it, or any of his staff have come forward to say anything about it.

I did not heckle the senator. Indeed, I didn't say a word. I didn't even ask a question. In fact, when I raised my hand to ask a question, the press conference abruptly ended. So, what I would suggest is that anyone who has any queries about whether I heckled, watch the videotape of the press conference -- Soledad.

O'BRIEN: Michael Ware in Baghdad for us. Thank you, Michael.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Michael Ware's very obvious b

Michael Ware's very obvious biased reporting against this country's victory, let alone his grating screeching voice is enough to make anyone start a war against all leftists everywhere....he has done this for years...I turn it as soon as I hear his voice.

I don't know if I can take the video but will give it a try....which is punishment in itself.

Ware has always been a propag

Ware has always been a propagandist and an unethical journalist. At least he should be honest about his actions and show a little integrity.

unnamed official?

WARE: "Well, let's bear in mind that this is a report that was leaked
by an unnamed official, of some kind, to a blog, to somewhere on the
Internet. No one is going to put their name forward. We certainly
haven't heard Senator McCain say anything about it, or any of his staff
have come forward to say anything about it."

Let's see Mr Ware.."leaked by an unnamed official...no one is going to put their name forward"? Don't YOU and the MSM do this ALL the time and we're supposed to take that as the gospel truth when YOU use that excuse?? Gimme a freakin break...you LIAR!!! Has this loser ever been out of the Green zone to do any reporting? What the hell does this guy know? "Journalist" my a**!!

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money..." MARGARET THATCHER

I've watched the video and th

I've watched the video and there is no heckling.

But it was interesting that in responding to O'Brien's question, Ware  first criticized the sources of the story and didn't get to his denial until three sentences later.  Again, apparently it didn't happen.  But he knew the video was out there.  So why didn't he just say, no, I didn't heckle the Senator, Soledad, rather than start with an elaborate, Clintonesque lead in? 

Maybe I'm just obsessing over details.  The whole thing is a little strange, though.

How much?

There were three armed helicopters , at least five armoured Humvees  & one hundred troops used  for McCains  Baghdad  publicity stunt! How much did that cost the US taxpayer?

Sp what?

WTH do you care? You'd just as soon he be dead anyway, right? Come on, tell us why the hell do you care? To quote the "HuffPo", "they were already going anyway..." Btw, show me some proof of your stupid comment..jacka**..

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money..." MARGARET THATCHER

Actually it was on CNN, pitur

Actually it was on CNN, pitures & all.

Your a big boy find it yourself.

M J B

Sorry kiddo, that's not how it works. YOU made the claim, YOU provide the link!!! Dan Rather would be proud.

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER

MJB.....and how many and much

MJB...

..and how many and much do you think is protecting the brainless blinky bonkers third in line treasonous traitor one... meeting with the enemy in Syria...pray tell?

Or Shrillary when she goes...

Get a grip you fool.

http://news.independent.co.uk

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2414760.ece

There is more to this world than Fox News.

Wow

Wow, M J B an article about hostages that has nothing to do with anything. Nice work

Why do you care what it costs

Why do you care what it costs the US Taxpayers?  You are not one of them.  IIRC, YOU are a Canadian living in Canada.

Don't you know, NL207?

Don't you know?   It's the new backseat driver ethic.  Every leftist in the world thinks they can do a better job of running our country.   Every congressman thinks he can do a better job of being President.  Every retired military hack thinks he can run the war better....and on and on and on......

Well, RJ, there is ample ev

Well, RJ, there is ample evidence that many other people could run our country better than Bush.

I know it is not fair (because it is so easy to come up with examples), but for one: Who else (in the entire world) would sit there for 7 minutes, continuing to read to some grade-school children AFTER being told by your aides that the United States of America IS UNDER ATTACK! Who else would do that??

I think it is obvious that there are many, many people on both sides who could do loads better than the man you helped elect.

As far as running the war better??  I think that someone with WAR EXPERIENCE COULD run the war better.  Remember ALL of the WRONG decisions (and claims) this guy has made??

There is ample evidence that Bush is one of the worst candidates that you could have elected. 

Chumpster, I could almost quote you BEFORE you post

Geez, Chumpster, I could almost quote you BEFORE you post.    ;^>

Still waiting for you to exhibit the slightest tendency toward using your own brain cells.  

Isn't that sweet, RJ.  You h

Isn't that sweet, RJ.  You have a new little friend following you around!

Chumly, what exactly was pr

Chumly, what exactly was president Bush told, that we were under attack, or that a plane had crashed in NYC?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM, save your breath...er, fi

MM, save your breath...er, fingers. That one is a lost cause troll.

"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."

I hear ya JAB, I just felt

I hear ya JAB, I just felt bad for the guy after the beating he got from RJ and BD yesterday. Thought he might like to tussle with someone more his speed. :-)

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Bush had already been informe

Bush had already been informed of the first plane, to which he responded something to the effect of: "Gee, that's one bad pilot."

Later, when he was reading "My Pet Goat," Andy Card whispered in his ear, "Mr. President, a second plane has struck the World Trade Center. America is under attack."

How did Shrub respond? By sitting there, frozen in terror. Cheney and the rest of his parents weren't there to tell "the decider" what to decide. If you watch the footage, it's written all over his face. You also see aides like Ari Fleischer sh-tting their pants because they know he's too freaked out to lead. It's really sad.

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

So you conclude that becaus

So you conclude that because Bush was calm and collected, that he was "too freaked out to lead"?

So waka waka, the great tribal leader, would have jumped up and ran screaming out of the room "WE'RE UNDER ATTACK!!, WE'RE UNDER ATTACT!!... DON'T PANIC!!"---- as every kid in the room starts crying.

Nice one cupcake. I think I like the presidents reaction better. I saw it on TV and thought he handled it properly. You, have terminal BDS (coupled with a nasty diaper rash).

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Mouth, to any reasonable pe

Mouth, to any reasonable person, the words "...a second plane has hit the other World Trade Center tower"... means "Sir, we are under attack". There is no other meaning possible.

Am I right?

Please see my post just abo

Please see my post just above yours. Apply to yourself, including the diaper rash if appropriate...

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Amen amen amen, Chumly. Could

Amen amen amen, Chumly. Could you imagine the response by the wingnuts on NB if it had been Gore that sat there for 7 minutes, paralyzed with fear? I shudder to think. I guarantee one thing, they'd never have been as kind to him as we were to Bush following 9/11. They seem to forget: We, and the rest of the world, gave the man a chance. Heck, Le Monde's 9/12 headline said it best: "We are all Americans."

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

Hey, it's Monkey Boy

If you will look up, ladies and gentlemen, you'll see our very own Monkey Boy, throwing things at humans from the safety of his tree.   It's very amusing to watch as the creature encourages the young monkey, Chumley.   ;^>

BJ, old friend! Glad to see y

BJ, old friend! Glad to see you too.

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

Hello, hater

Hello, hater.

Interesting...

Wow... very interesting read. However, allow me to ask you some simple questions. As you are obviously not a parent, based upon your idea of how to act around kids in a crisis situation, how would you have reacted the moment that someone told you that the country was under attack? Bare in mind, that this information was given to Bush while a large amount of *very* young children were around the president. Around a large amount of children, [decent] knows, you don't panic in situations with them. If you panic with a room full of kids, or run out immediately, the kids (who are emotional sponges, mind you), would have been ten times as bad. Yes, I DO know what I am talking about. My son has ADHD and takes the emotional sponge statement to another level entirely. My son is also not the only child with ADD or ADHD. Sitting out that 7 minutes, reading to kids, did NOTHING to stop the attacks on 9/11 because there was nothing that could have been done in that 7 minute window. For all the conspiracy nuts out there, why don't you tell me how that 7 minutes could have possibly been better spent? We were already attacked. Two planes had already hit, another was about to hit the Pentagon, and the one was about to go down elsewhere. What, exactly, could Bush or any other president do in that 7 minutes that would have made a difference?

Secondly, war experience? Wrong decisions? Letting your generals on the ground, make the decisions for the war, is somehow the "wrong decision"? Imagine what would have happened if you were around during World War I and World War II. Neither of the presidents at their beginnings had any military experience, let alone war experience. Roosevelt and Wilson were both non-military background presidents, and they saw through their wars until their end (except in the case of Roosevelt who died in office). Even Lincoln, who saw the US through one of the bloodiest and greatest wars in the history of the country, had limited "war" experience. But hey... let's talk about the elite liberal establishments' great flag bearer: William Jefferson Clinton. No military experience, no war experience. Yet he was elected to the office of the presidency without ever once gaining a majority vote, and every military decision he made, he made in error. Yet, that is ignored.

The bottom line is, Bush has run this war as he should have: He put his generals in charge of running it, and has stood by THEIR decisions, since they are the ones who see the changing of circumstances on a daily basis.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

What reality are you living i

What reality are you living in? Everytime generals give Bush news he doesn't want to hear he doesn't stand by them-he fires them!

he's the commander, Blarsoon

He's their BOSS, Dopey! If he doesn't like the news, it's likely their fault for the news.

Are you from earth ?

Incorrect

Let me guess, you are referring to General Eric Shinseki? Shinseki served his term as the General of the Army. His time was up, there was no firing. Yet, you don't know the ins and outs of the Army, that much is obvious. Shinseki was well known for making horrible policy decisions concerning the Army. His beret nonsense alone, cost millions of dollars, and did nothing for morale of the Army, which is what the intent was. All he did, was spend the money, and piss of the Army Rangers... good call.

Not to mention, Shinseki, as I have explained hundreds of times, is a product of Cold War Armor training. His (and Powell's) idea of how to win ANY war, is through the use of massive numbers. The idea of Franks (who, by the way was trained initially as Artillery, who don't believe in massive numbers), was to take strategic points, and move accordingly. This is a mantra of the Special Forces, Rangers, SEALs, and obviously Artillery.

Can you possibly show me one General that ever gave Bush bad news, that was fired shortly thereafter?

Good luck trying to find one (by finding one, that means you have to show incontroversial evidence that the general was fired for giving Bush bad news), especially one that is not, nor has ever been, a loyal Democrat. In addition to this, I would like to point out... if it were even true (which it's not), it's a far cry from the documented proofs of Saddam dealing with people who gave him bad news...


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Mr Bishop:As you indicate, Sh

Mr Bishop:

As you indicate, Shinseki was on  his way out for his Beret fiasco that I am still afflicted by.

His successor was picked long before he made any recommendation regarding Iraq.

Indeed

Shinseki pissed a lot of us off with that decision. While a lot of REMF's thoroughly enjoyed his new policy (for some reason, they felt it validated their entire existance), it really was a thorn in the side of us that actually went through the training that was necessary to get any color beret: Green, black or red. To simply hand out something like this, as a means of "raising morale" was nothing short of a kick in the teeth to all of us.

I was glad, frankly, that his term had come up, and that he was being replaced. Shinseki was a joke of a general, and nothing short of an embarrassment to those of us that earned the beret.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

I miss my patrol cap.... snif

I miss my patrol cap.... sniff....(Tear in left eye)

Meh

Even when I went into a mortar platoon in the National Guard, we still wore our PC, depending on the circumstances. I just Ranger rolled mine, and was able to b*tch out a captain who had the audacity to complain about it.

However, I agree with you... it was sorely missed on everyday usage... held sweat a lot better, and easier to wash :)


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Obviously someone who does no

Obviously someone who does not have a clue on the military.  The General was on his way out and boy did I have a lot of friends down in Brag pissed over the Beret. 

 I thought he would get snipered for that one.

No one said he had to jump an

No one said he had to jump and freak out the kids. All he had to do was politely interrupt the teacher, tell them, "sorry kids, being president is a busy job and something important has just come up. Finish reading your book."

And besides, the kids were going to be freaked out anyway as soon as they took a look at a television set.

As commander in chief, I'd say assessing the situation, making decisions, LEADING the nation were what he should have been doing in those 7 minutes, not trying to "protect" a handful of children from bad news they were going to find out anyway. And that whole "protect the kids" excuse was the just the best explanation his handlers could come up with to hide the truth from everyone: that he's an inept, weak man who was way out of his depth (and continues to be).

Whether or not he could have prevented any more destruction in those 7 minutes is irrelevant. According to your argument, there was no point in him doing anything at all that day.

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

don't make me laugh

Picturing the likes of you reacting with a snap of your fingers to a national catastrophe like 9-11 is too corny to imagine. I suspect Woody Allen is better qualified to look over President Bush's shoulder than you; a commie-lib nerd in his skivvies all day. Get a life, paki waki. Let go that wank.

I checked your link out. I

I checked your link out. I see a man in deep thought about what to do next. Did you even look at your own link?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

So...

In other words, as I expected, you, nor anyone else can possibly tell me what the president should have done during that 7 minute window that you all scream about. It's about as much as I expected, so don't bother even trying to respond. You're already looking like an inexperienced fool.

In matters of military, even on the battlefield, it takes more then 7 minutes to accomplish a lot of anything. In the infantry, when we are registering our mortars after laying in our guns, it takes about 12-15 minutes after the first shot, for the FO's to come back with some minor corrections before the point is registered. I might point out also, this is a small area of the battlefield, not a large scale decision making process, such as defending the entirety of the country. A 7 minute window, for Bush or any president, is not nearly enough time for anything to be accomplished. It would have been considerably more damaging to jump up from what he was doing, for a lot of nothingness. Since Bush could not do anything, logistically, militarily or any other way, there was no need to cause a mass panic and hysteria in a school full of little children.

The bottom line, you cannot prove, on any level, that Bush is inept. The best arguments you use, is that he makes bad decisions in Iraq. Ooops!! Bush lets his commanders on the ground make those decisions, so you lose again.

You really ought to come back here with some knowledge on the issue, instead of rhetoric repeated ad nauseam from liberal BS websites.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

Waka Waka:Okay, I fiat you th

Waka Waka:

Okay, I fiat you that GWB is immeidately whisked to the STRATCOM Op's center as soon as he is notified.  THe question for you now is "What in addition to what was done by the DEF Department could he had done?"

Please give specifics.

I'm still wondering what you

I'm still wondering what you and Michael Moore wanted him to do. 

Would his immediate departure from the scene have changed the situation?  I mean could he have put on a Superman cape and made it all better? 

Most of all; Why the HECK are you even bring it back up?  Did they run out of Liberal talking points at Huffpo and Moveon?

Get a freaking life Waka.  Go date a girl, or drive your Prius to the next meeting of the Global "Hyperactive" Warming society. 

PPPPLLLLLEEEEAAASSEE.

Chumpster, for once I agree.

Chumpster, for once I agree. I could run it, and the war would be a distant memory by now. On the down side, so would the middle east. But all things considered, W is doing ok, what with the likes of you always harping about something.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Chumly:As a couple of histori

Chumly:

As a couple of histories point out, FDR had lunch following word that Pearl Harbor was under attack.

What could FDR have done?  Jumped up to insist that MacArthur dispatch is B-17s to Formosa to bomb the Japanese airfields that would bomb him later that night. 

As someone who has worked in numerous Op's centers, I hold niether FDR nor GWB liable for their actions at that time.  Various Op's centers were working the issue, and having the 900 Lb gorilla raise his head would have done no one any good.

I guess GWB is not looking so bad, huh?

Still drinking that Michael M

Still drinking that Michael Moore kool-aid are we Chumly?

Go hit the old blunt, settle in for a night of Idol and let the adults talk.

I am a Brit by birth & ha

I am a Brit by birth & have relatives in the armed forces.

What goes on in Iraq effects much of the world in one way or another as do other incidents.

Do you not care what goes in other countries?

Thanks anyway, JMB

Oh, sure I do.   Speaking of that, you must be proud that England has decided to stop teaching the holocaust in deference to their muslim population.  You must also be proud that the fifth largest economy in the world is 28th in military strength.

Like I said we don't need fainthearted backseat drivers here, thanks anyway.

What do your remarks have to

What do your remarks have to do with McCain?

But to answer>> The UK may have less spending on the military as you have suggested but they , quite unfortunatley, put about 50K troops into Iraq during the invasion to find WMD.

Who else was stupid enough to emulate them? 

Focus, MJ, focus

Focus, MJ, focus.  You asked if we cared about what happened in other countrys and I answered.   And, quite a few countrys emulate them...countries who understand that freedom must be earned....unlike whiny leftists who only know gimmie, gimmie.

Canadian? Proud of the fact t

Canadian? Proud of the fact that the North Dakota State National Guard has more firepower than your entire country?  Germany has a larger armored force in Southern Saskatchewan in training centers than Canada has in the entire arsenal?

Socialism is killing Canada, and it is doing it in its sleep.

Would you guys quit playing w

Would you guys quit playing with MJB.  You are just making his wee-wee tingle.  Leave him alone and let him get back to his self abasement.

Yaba daba doo!  -Fred Flintstone campaign slogan

MJB,The question I have for y

MJB,

The question I have for you is where is your loyalty and pride?

Other than the leftist views of this world and how you and your ilk think it should be.

You would not be here at all to post what you are posting if people like you leftists ran the world.

You are blind.

See nothing..hear nothing...know nothing.

Evil is evil.

You have no choice but to fight...but then again peolpe like you complain and let others spill their blood...

Pathetic.

Wake up...before it is too late for you and those you may love.

Too sad for you.All of the Br

Too sad for you.

All of the Brits of my acquaintance are advocates for the GWOT.

And not sissified limp wristed Brits like you.

They are allies...not wimps.

Tony Blair will make us all proud before he leaves office.  I believe in him.  Unlike you.

Why don't you take your TV tax and go hole up for the holocaust with the Islamofascists.  Just tuck it in, and see how it turns out.  We'll win it...and when you crawl out...English will still be the official language.

And then you can say "thank you".

That's all we require.

Blonde; You, the USA, are ju

Blonde; You, the USA, are just about on your own & you have Lossed.It's happened, finished . Get used to it.

As  to your remark about all the Brits of your aquaintance etc; I never said we were all perfect. 

Care to try that again?Most o

Care to try that again?

Most of the Brits of my acquaintance are far more articulate than you.

I never said "you" were all perfect.

I just said they had a whole hell of alot more sense than you appear to have.

P.S.  Next time you try to indict the whole U.S. of A.  check your six...silly fool...and your spell checker would be helpful as well.

BTW, don't worry, mate, if we need to do it on our own...we shall.

We'll bail your asses out.  We owe you that much.

MJB, you and your fellow Brits are in deep dog squeeze.

M J B,

Uhh, finished are we? Far from it, pal. In fact, if anybody is finished, it appears the Europeans are far closer to finished than we are, as they appear to be about to capitulate to the Muslim fascists. How stupid. Besides, if we do go down, most of the civilized world will be going with us. And that includes those currently residing on your island.

If we are on our own, that is just fine by me, as we will no-longer have to put up with saving other country's asses for them (both yours and those of the spineless, thankless weenies residing across the channel from you) and can therefore, for once, concentrate on ourselves.

Given the lack of births by native Britains, and the increasing birthrate on the part of the Muslims you people have been allowing into your country in droves, I suspect that, before I leave this rock (I am 43) the capitol city of the once mighty United Kingdom will be firmly under Sharia Law.

Should be fun being forced to pray towards Mecca five times a day, particularly with that cold steel barrel of an AK-47 pressed firmly against the back of your neck by some barely literate 7th Century chap named Akhmed or Habib.

Gee, I wonder how much it is going to cost the British taxpayers to change all those signs and maps to read Londonistan?

By the way, since you are no doubt reading this in English instead of German, be sure and thank a soldier. An American soldier. Who knows, perhaps Arabic will not be such a difficult language to master for you cultured Brits after all.

Oh, and be sure to keep up a stiff upper lip. That shouldn't be too difficult for you Brits, that is right up until Akhmed and Habib come along and raise that sword above your infidel neck and lop off your bloody head.

Blimey!

This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.

That's right.  To the extent

That's right.  To the extent that policies in foreign countries are domestic, I could care less what they do.  If the Canadians were to fill a swinning pool with jello and naked ladies so Stephen Harper and friends could go for a frolic, I could care less.  If, on the other hand, he Canadains wanted to dump a buch of pollutants into the Great Lakes, I would certainly object.

The same rules apply to thugs like Hugo Chavez.  If he wants to brutaize Venezuelans, that's their problem.  But when he starts to forment Anti-Americanism in central and South America, then he becomes the enemy.

Uh-huh

Somehow, I doubt very seriously that you are concerned about the cost of McCain going to Baghdad. If you were, you'd be as concerned about the security costs of the Democrats going to Iraq over the past several years, and even more concerned about the cost of security of Nancy Pelosi going to a terrorist safe haven... Syria. But, somehow, I don't think you care about the cost so much, as McCain actually getting photo time with the US military in the background. Now, I don't care for McCain personally, but to attack a man because of such a stupid argument as you have made, it seems to smack of simple liberal biasness when you ignore, in the same statements you make on McCain, what Pelosi and other Democrats have done.


"Stop global warming! Asphyxiate a liberal!" -
Show us how far you're willing to go to stop "global warming"

In the cities of America

In the cities of America, all the big cities of America, there is probably 1/4 of the property within the city limits none of these reporters would walk around in without a security detail.

 If they were a congressperson, all the more so.

I note Michael Moore never got out of the safety of his security footage van when he drove through the neighborhood of Flint, of which he was never a resident.

Most residences I've travelled to here in the USA - require a phone call to the local police station to report your license plate if parked overnight. That's here in the USA. Security at the residences of average Americans.

 I'd bet there's hired security guards manning the doors at  CNN, and at the studio Soledad Obrien casts from. Is it dangerous there as well ?

Sport Politic. I have two thi

Sport Politic. I have two thing to add. McCain was trying to prove just how "safe" Baghdad is & made an idiot of himself in doing so.

As for Michael Moore ; look out for a Canadian movie (perhaps just made for TV) that lambastes Moore for  hypocrisy especially with his movie Rodger & Me.

I believe the title is Manufacturing Dissent.

You dont have to be right wing to be an idiot!

http://imdb.com/title/tt09611

McCain's trip to the market i

McCain's trip to the market is his own "Dukakis in the tank." Poor Walnuts!

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

So all those autoworkers that

So all those autoworkers that were laid off were just our imaginations?

http://www.iraqslogger.com/in

I have been to Bagdhad, twice

I have been to Bagdhad, twice, I know there are safe neighborhoods now that used to be deadly. 

 You been there?

Delicious.Reality has a well

Delicious.

Reality has a well known liberal bias.

Nice writing, Chumley. If you

Nice writing, Chumley. If you are not careful and out debate the folks here that resort to vitriol instead of facts they might censor your comments.

A free press is one of the first things to go in a totalitarian government. Montana Lyons

Awwww. Poor Monty

Awwww, poor baby.   Monty, you and the Chumpster keep wandering around, like little kids on the playground, begging to be noticed...but no one pays much attention.  

But, say, with your repeated claims of censorship, you sound like rhayes....is that you randy?

hmmmm..**Scanning thread fo

hmmmm..

**Scanning thread for "facts" from waka, Lyons or Chumly**

**working.....**

**working....**

**Scan Complete, no facts found!**

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

I know Lyons does not wish

I know Lyons does not wish to answer my "are all the planets 'wobbling' at the same rate as Mars is, or is it the alien SUVs causing them to get warmer too, since we know it can't be the sun that's doing it!?" science-question from this morning...The cloak's bipartisan.
JMR