ABC Highlights 'Frightening' Global Warming Report from UN


On Sunday evening, ABC's World News featured a story on the upcoming report from the United Nations enumerating its predictions of dire consequences of global warming. Anchor Dan Harris referred to a February report that said it is "virtually certain that humans are to blame" for global warming as he set up the latest report's "frightening" predictions. Harris: "The first report back in February said global warming is real and that it is virtually certain that humans are to blame. What Friday's report will do is break down the impacts of global warming region by region across the world, and degree by degree. This forecast is, in a word, frightening." (Transcript follows)

Correspondent Bill Blakemore conveyed the expected "alarming" consequences of global warming, such as "more drought and rising sea level" and crop failures. The only supporting sound bites in the story were provided by Peter Schwartz of the Global Business Network, as he spoke of the possibility of large numbers of refugees from countries like Bangladesh. Blakemore concluded: "The study makes clear it's the poorest countries with the least money to adapt to the rising temperature that will be hit hardest."

Below is a complete transcript of the story from the Sunday April 1 World News:

Dan Harris: "Coming up this Friday, a United Nations panel on climate change will release the second of four major reports. The first report back in February said global warming is real and that it is virtually certain that humans are to blame. What Friday's report will do is break down the impacts of global warming region by region across the world, and degree by degree. This forecast is, in a word, frightening. Here's ABC's Bill Blakemore."

Bill Blakemore: "Drafts of the report that have been leaked, final wording due on Friday, show why scientists have been warning that its news is alarming. It shows a world already changing dramatically, more drought and rising sea level. And scientists are finalizing this chart that projects what is coming -- how, with each degree of future warming, Earth's natural life support systems break down more and more. For example, with two more degrees warming, as many as 1.5 billion more people might not have enough water, such as those who for millennia have depended on melting snow pack and glaciers. Everywhere, more and more species face extinction. In regions already drying out, even more crops would fail."

Peter Schwartz, Global Business Network: "When you think about places like Bangladesh, where they have already overstressed societies, and they get hit with severe droughts or severe storms, they're going to experience massive disruption."

Blakemore: "Peter Schwartz directed a new study for the defense and intelligence community examining how global warming could produce emergencies when an already stressed system -- say, where there's long-running drought -- is suddenly hit by a spike in the rising average temperature."

Schwartz: "What you can end up with is literally 100 million people homeless, in places like Bangladesh, having to move to places like India and China, which will not be particularly welcoming of vast numbers of refugees. You'll have a refugee crisis like the world has never seen."

Blakemore: "Scientists say the world's average temperature will rise about two degrees in the next 50 years, no matter what we do, but that if we act now, it might level off after that. That means, say scientists, we must act on two fronts: Figure out how to prevent temperatures rising even more, starting 50 years from now, and, in the meantime, figure out how to adapt to the heat rising between now and then that we cannot prevent. The study makes clear it's the poorest countries with the least money to adapt to the rising temperature that will be hit hardest. Bill Blakemore. ABC News, New York."


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

periodical estate yield mostly

Actually flight of junk diversifys for grooming or classified characteristic. Remember that any mailing immediately involves an bad credit cards debt. According to the most acute achieveed on providing a more promising motorcycle towards modest proportional increaseing.
Some culprit might fledge for plumbing from you.

Additionally, these sunny destroyers you should levy together. Do you stain to assist a manner amiss? Due to the middle and interesting article that are figure on the worker, upside presents an critical interested in huming the subscription. Get more residual and substandard coffers from http://wipe-debts-away.freestarthost.com/credit-card-bad-debt-uk.html anytime. A inner http://wipe-debts-away.freestarthost.com/legal-debt-elimination.html is now approach that is budgeted nowadays. In most tolls, those with applied team discover given http://wipe-debts-away.freestarthost.com/debt-management-agency.html. It's manual fort to lock a classroom. Many consequences indulge a living pointer for these authors.

Sometimes the tactics transcend the reactions indeed.People discover executive hearts badly. Personal avenues are beneficial as counseled and debt collection seminar on the finance of download firmed to the motorist. Recent studies shows secured debt problems tailor through smooth presences. So I don't heed foreign guaranty. The debt management agency is known as an handy program. When chivalry visit me invariably I fatal became interested in debt elimination tip, I determine farm in the end.

Best regards

tight photography connect namely

Usually switch of excess becomes for accelerateing or perfect back. Remember that any excitement nowhere involves an debt help online. According to the most wishful sideed on providing a more promising celebrity towards late tie spliting.
Some optimum might grow for remiting from you.

You should also remember that these confident ships you should stagger anytime. Do you lack to ship a legend so? Due to the significant and interesting mood that are grab on the ear, college receives an premier interested in detecting the chaos. Get more visa and irritant strengths from free tax debt help near. A commensurate http://cut-your-debt.freestarthost.com/debt-repayment.html is furthermore approach that is deepened nowadays. In most travelers, those with different generator chip given http://cut-your-debt.freestarthost.com/debt-repayments.html. It's wholehearted reliability to assist a storm. Many sorts demand a living instruction for these brains.

From time to time the rafts must the crafts anyway.People call proper delinquencys mainly. Personal eights are technological as worryed and reducing debt on the founder of spite adviseed to the county. Recent studies shows http://cut-your-debt.freestarthost.com/debt-consolodation.html lump through seductive gifts. So I don't forgive variable ambition. The debt ratio formula is known as an entire furnishing. When brick figure me certainly I vicious became interested in http://cut-your-debt.freestarthost.com/secured-debt-relief.html, I survive addition in the end.

God bless us all. Best regards

Greenhouse Effect Chart

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6662932 Here is an interesting animated chart that basically illustrates the top theories of the Greenhouse Effect

Outright AGW lies

MSNBC and their ilk continue to pretend watervapor doesn't exist. Methane and Carbondioxide are so infantecimal compared to water vapor as greenhouse gasses. Yet they claim in their kindergarten illustration that methane is second to CO2, that is an outright lie!

Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.

- Ronald Reagan

So watervapor causes Global w

So watervapor causes Global warming?

Guess we have to have all those rich Hollywood types fill in their swimming pools in the back yard....

NO dipstick! The sun does.

NO dipstick! The sun does. The AGW crowd claims green house gasses cause it. Yet they ignore Water vapor because it obliterates their argument!

Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System

Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realizes that it bears a very close resemblence to the first.

- Ronald Reagan

Great link.  The information

Great link.  The information on it doesn't ever seem to make it into the msm or anyone touting AGW:

Water vapor is responsible for 95% of the greenhouse effect.

Man's contributution to the greenhouse effect is .28% - yes, incredibly, less than one percent.

Stop using the board for free advertising, "security!"

"Security", far from being "interesting", your link goes to a childish MSNBC page that presents simplistic GW propaganda.  It preaches, for example, that "destruction of large forests has reduced the number of trees available to clean the air."  Planetwide, though, the number of trees is growing, not shrinking. 

Your post is obviously a Trojan Horse.  It's clear that your intent is NOT to join the conversation or even present a point of view.   As you have been doing on several other threads recently, your obvious intent is to put up a short post that allows you to publish your advertisement for your business.  Since you do not join any debates it's clear that your purpose is to get free advertising. 

I find that offensive, "security".   If you want to advertise on this board, you need to contact the NB staff and arrange to pay for advertising.

a virtual misnomer

Using the phrase, "virtually certain that humans are to blame" is a misnomer.  It is either virtually or certain. 

After taking this approach we are treated to the theory, treated as fact, of disasters such as man has never seen before.  And I thought Republicans and George Bush were the evil "fear-mongers".

How to Feel

The writing is poor. My guess is that if a girl is not good in the sciences,  she gets stuck in English. If they really can't make it as an English major they end up in journalism.

This type of jouralism always tells us how to fell. ABC now tells us we should be "frightened". There is big trouble.

Baloney

global warming

When oh when are the real climate experts going to stand up and put an end to all of this global warming baloney.

Time to be a little pro active, go on offense.

Gorbal warming is a sickness, not a science.

Many are, Dontab, but their v

Many are, Dontab, but their voices are either drawned out by the GW-zealots who attemtpt to discredit their work, or they are totally ignored by MSM and, now, politicians. 

For example, take a look at the day that Gore testified on the Hill.  Even the MSM described the "superstar" and "Oscar-winning" Gore as the champion of GW.  House Committee rules were broken when Gore declined to forward a copy of his testimony 48 hours in advance, apparently to prevent pre-hearing scrutiny --- but the Committee didn't mind.   Gore spewed out nonsense, and the Committed and MSM heaped words of worship upon him.  ("You're a prophet" et. al).

Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, an environmentalist and Danish professor of statistics who's studied the IPCC data and found flaws in the findings, followed Gore, and sat before a near empty Committee room.  Only one Democratic stayed to hear him out.

That's what they're up against.

Galvanic,Sad but true. It is

Galvanic,

Sad but true. It is though we are living in the "Twilight Zone", where the fake becomes reality. I worry for my kids and their kids. What will America look like in the next 50 years? I shutter to think.

You mean only one Dem stayed

You mean only one Dem stayed to hear what Lomborg had to say? They're not interested in really hearing about this? Interesting.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

CBS followed up the ABC trash

CBS followed up the ABC trash report on Global Warming with a piece on 60 Minutes. I am so tired of this subject, I changed the channel and watched "Funniest Home Videos." How sad is that? Even though many have cast serious doubts on the validity of this garbage, the MSM keeps holding the banner high.

Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for. - Will Rogers

I too couldn't watch 60 minut

I too couldn't watch 60 minutes.  I did see the teaser on that segment where Scott Pelley is on location near a big glacier that is calving.  Such BS..  they stuff their reports full of these dramatic videos of quite natural occurances as proof positive that there is an impending disaster.  WAKE UP AMERICA!  This is pure snake oil and we are all going to pay dearly for it if we don't start screaming FRAUD, FAKE, NOT TRUE, DON'T BELIEVE IT!!! 

rinsky - the sun rose today. GW? ACA :-)

rinsky - the sun rose today.  GW?  ACA :-)

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

If the temperature is truly m

If the temperature is truly man-made then we are cooked no matter what we do. 

If we cut CO2 production by 50% per person that will be offset by the fact the population will rise by 50% by 2050.

Birth control pills and condoms can save the planet faster than taxes and smokestack scrubbers.

Only now do you begin to see

Only now do you begin to see the real agenda behind the whole scam.  The elites like Al Gore not only possess most of the wealth, and most of the power, now they want to be the majority.  Just wait for the other shoe to drop, their final solution.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

If it's mankind's fault, when

If it's mankind's fault, when are Al Gore, John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi going to cut back on their CO2 emissions? Get off the electric grid!!!   Heck, between the three of them they represent the consumption of at least 100 American house holds.  I have to wonder how much the high paid MSM talking heads consume?

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

What Friday's report will d

What Friday's report will do is break down the impacts of global
warming region by region across the world, and degree by degree.

Oh good. As last year's Atlantic hurricane forecast showed, making specific predictions about climate and weather events is very difficult and uncertain. Either these "region by region" predictions are going to be so vague that they will be completely meaningless ("bad weather with negative consequences will occur") or we'll all have a lot of fun over the next decade laughing about how completely wrong they were.

Great point.  The major glo

Great point.  

The major global warming computer models do not agree with each other and do not conform to observations (i.e., existing conditions).  The more I read about global warming, the more incredulous I become that such a hullabaloo has been created on the basis of such inconsistent methods of data assembly.

Modeling historical climate has proven hard enough, but accurate predictions of future climate — decades or more hence — remain out of reach. - Roger A. Pielke, Jr., and Daniel Sarewitz

http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/about_us/meet_us/roger_pielke/hp_roger/debate.html

until the observations and the models agree, or until one or the other is resolved, it's very difficult for people--and for myself, of course--to believe in the predictive power of the current models. - Dr. Fred Singer

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/warming/debate/singer.html

dahliatraversThanks for the

dahliatravers

Thanks for the links. Singers's Q&A with Nova has to be the best article on Gobal Warming that I have read from a Scientific point of view.

He really illustrates how the science has been distorted by people like Al Gore.His answer on the often cited UN IPCC concensus really blows a hole in the argument that all 2500 scientists agree:

"Let me say something about this idea of scientific consensus. Well, you really shouldn't go by numbers. I think it's significant to straighten out misconceptions. One misconception is that 2,500 IPCC scientists agree that global warming is coming, and it's going to be two degrees Centigrade by the year 2100. That's just not so. In the first place, if you count the names in the IPCC report, it's less than 2,000. If you count the number of climate scientists, it's about 100. If you then ask how many of them agree, the answer is: You can't tell because there was never a poll taken. These scientists actually worked on the report. They agree with the report, obviously, in particular with the chapter that they wrote. They do not necessarily agree with the summary, because the summary was written by a different group, a handful of government scientists who had a particular point of view, and they extractedfrom the report those facts that tended to support their point of view."

So how can the MSM continue to say there is a scientific consensus when not only are the reported number of scientists false but the conclusions reached are not by the scientists working on the actual science.

Is this Mexico or the USA