Should air around 9:30 p.m. EDT tonight, a producer told me in an e-mail.
But before you tune in, drink up our Rosie O (two cans short of a) Six Pack:
- Rosie's Blog Claims 'British Did It On Purpose' and Are Running 'False Flag Operations' With British Sailors In Iran
- Rosie Sees Only Evil in US, Not Iran, Speaks on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
- Rosie on Attorney Firings: False Facts, Bizarre Comparisons, and Impeachment Call
- Rosie Implies Captured Brits Are A Contrived 'Gulf of Tonkin' For War With Iran
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I tried making an life-size
March 30, 2007 - 19:38 ET by Jack BauerI tried making an life-sized effigy of Rosie that I could burn in honor...
But I gave up after three hours. I just couldn't get another ten bales of hay to stuff the thing with.
Heck Jack...I'd donate to tha
March 30, 2007 - 19:51 ET by bigtimerHeck Jack...
I'd donate to that effigy!
Even be glad to pay the postage and handling and throw in a bic!
LMAO!
Yeah I'm fed up seeing craz
March 30, 2007 - 19:57 ET by Jack BauerYeah I'm fed up seeing crazed lefties and arabs burning effigies of servicemen, or the Stars & Stripes.
Conservatives need a civilized riot of our own where we get to burn effigies, and flags too.
Arafat (let's dig him up and kill him again). Palestinian flags. Iranians flags. Let's have a big bonfire.
Make sure the crane holds you
April 2, 2007 - 11:06 ET by SpoonMake sure the crane holds your 10-ton effigy upside down, though the structural support for the hanging gut may require some steel framing. Too bad fire can't melt steel... keep some.. ummm.. what melts steel? How do they make it? Better e-mail Rosie...
Mohammad, Jack. Lets not forg
April 2, 2007 - 11:09 ET by bassndudeMohammad, Jack. Lets not forget the big Mo. This is all his doing anyway.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Jack, scale it down to 1/4
April 12, 2007 - 12:46 ET by MightyMouthJack, scale it down to 1/4 then you would only need this to lift it.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I think we ought to let her k
March 30, 2007 - 19:55 ET by niner-four-whiskeyI think we ought to let her keep talking.
There's nothing else anyone can do to make it any clearer where she and the rest of the left-wing is coming from.
Not only that, 94W
March 30, 2007 - 20:05 ET by RJNot only that, 94W, she draws the hate-America cockroaches out to defend her.
I've always said the RNC shou
April 12, 2007 - 12:41 ET by TruthMongerI've always said the RNC should be paying people like Rosie to just keep on talkin! BTW where the hell is olberdolt been lately - drool buckets getting a well-earned refit in the shop or something...?
I challenge these so-called "peace-activists" to organize JUST ONE MAJOR D.C. PROTEST AGAINST AL QUEDA by the end of 2007...
Rosie
March 30, 2007 - 20:06 ET by Emma GrumpBetween Rosie and Joy, poor little Elisabeth can't make herself heard. I'd like to see Laura Ingraham replace her. Now that would make for entertainment.
Laura Ingraham wouldn't was
March 30, 2007 - 21:43 ET by motherbeltLaura Ingraham wouldn't waste her time on this drivel. The clips I've seen (I don't watch the show) increasingly remind me of the "Whose Line Is It Anyway?" segment featuring Colin Mochrie as the Director. He regularly berates the others acting out the scene with lines like (pointing): You---crap! You----crap! You---your performance didn't even rise to the level of crap!
Rosie believes in plenty of f
April 12, 2007 - 12:42 ET by TruthMongerRosie believes in plenty of free speech - for herself only of course...
I completely agree. Her dai
March 30, 2007 - 22:53 ET by PSOSI completely agree. Her daily diatribes are doing more damage to liberalism than we could ever hope to do with rational arguments. She is evidence that the left has actually become the parody we've always made of it. It's getting harder and harder to make fun of these people because they've become a satire of themselves.
It amazes me that ABC executives aren't embarrassed to put her on the air.
I think the world’s had eno
March 30, 2007 - 20:39 ET by Gat New YorkI think the world’s had enough of this lunatic. I think she has gone over the edge and more than once. It is time for ABC to fire her. She is causing irreparable pain to the families of people lost on 9/11, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq.
I believe that Rosie is perpetrating a campaign of sedition against the United States government with her comments on the View and on her blog. I do not believe that people should be watching that show anymore or supporting the advertisers who sponsor that show.
Gat, You are absolutely rig
March 30, 2007 - 21:13 ET by stownGat,
You are absolutely right. I don't watch this drivel, but I have seen and heard enough about Rosie and the View to be hopping mad. I have reluctantly looked at her blog as well.
Since I refuse to turn to that channel, can anyone supply us with a list of the advertisers supporting this abomination?
I would gladly communicate my displeasure.
Another angle
April 12, 2007 - 10:14 ET by Cool ArrowI'm hoping our revulsion of Rosie emboldens Demolibs to skootch even closer to her.
Nature abhors a vacuum. That's why we naturally can't stand her.
Ellis Hennican just made an
March 30, 2007 - 21:38 ET by motherbeltEllis Hennican just made an excellent point: Rosie is not on "The View" to be knowledgeable. She is supposed to attract an audience. He then told Hannity and Colmes that by their having a segment on their show almost weekly, featuring Rosie, they are helping her do that.
Lousy segment as usual. Their
March 30, 2007 - 21:40 ET by stownLousy segment as usual.
Their choice for the conservative viewpoint did nothing to help.
Blech..........
I agree. They certainly co
March 30, 2007 - 21:46 ET by motherbeltI agree. They certainly could've gotten someone more articulate and substantive than Curtis Sliwa.
Rosie
March 30, 2007 - 21:45 ET by david999Easily refuted but I guess the ABC ceo thinks it ok for her to lie about our troops, our country
Read Popular Mechanics
http://www.popularme...
Rosie. You're too smart to
March 30, 2007 - 21:52 ET by dahliatraversRosie. You're too smart to be saying this stuff.
Look, sure, we don't know for sure what was going on on March 23 in the straits between Iraq and Iran. Maybe the British boat was doing something stupid, though with satelite technology and fly over drones, it doesn't seem likely the Brits would use a small boat to spy.
Great Britain has offered proof (presumably, Loran positioning readings - do I sound real sailorly saying that??) that their boat and the 15 sailors was not in Iranian waters. Certainly this would be helpful. Iran has so far refused to look at this evidence.
Now why would that be? Would it be inconvenient to the Mullahs if it were proven that the boat was not in Iranian waters? Could there be other reasons they took the British sailors? Are they looking for a hostage swap for the five Iranians who were taken into custody in Iraq in January? Are they annoyed that one of their top generals defected? ARE THE MULLAHS PERHAPS WAGGING THE DOG to distract from the serious internal dissent and dissatisfaction that has been brewing amoung its citizens over the failure of the Islamic revolution?
What a lot of people don't know is, Iranians are the most pro-US/pro-West people in the Middle East. Below are two articles about Iran, its people and government. It is ruled by a repressive dictatorship with no justice system as we know it that inflicts barbaric forms of official punishment on its people.
The thing is, Rosie, when you say things like, this was a false flag operation (you may want to look that up, by the way, before using it again), it's Gulf of Tonkin (... um, ditto), you believe Ahmadinijad over Great Britain, it's not just that you are taking sides against Great Britain and the United States.
You are taking the side of a dictator against his beleaguered people. Is this really where you stand?
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18445
http://www.heritage.org/Research/WorldwideFreedom/bg2019.cfm
This would make a great email
March 30, 2007 - 22:23 ET by Scout FinchThis would make a great email to Rosie, Dahlia. Oh......wait........Rosie doesn't accept emails from viewers. I wonder why?
To those who would insist that Baba Wawa or ABC shut Rosie off--to you I say let Rosie continue. I agree with above poster, in that keeping Rosie unleashed and unmugged provides a great service to real Americans. It clarifies and distinguishes the line between clear thinking and complete idiocy, and it's obvious that Rosie sides with dictators and despots over humble people.
Thanks, Scout! (... Why wou
March 30, 2007 - 22:54 ET by dahliatraversThanks, Scout!
(... Why wouldn't she accept e-mail from her viewers?)
Rosie. You're too smart to
March 31, 2007 - 10:35 ET by motherbeltRosie. You're too smart to be saying this stuff.--dahliatravers
No, she's not. Rosie the O is the personification of the saying "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing." She is the aunt that shows up at family dinners and proceeds to tell everyone in the family "what's what" and how they should live their lives. And to top it off, she is willing to give every tinpot dictator the benefit of the doubt while she automatically believes the worst of her own country. I can't believe that people actually watch those mental lightweights and think they are getting an intelligent read on current events.
hehe ... i think rosie's days
March 30, 2007 - 22:56 ET by pmohbuckhehe ... i think rosie's days on "the view" are numbered ...
"At some point, the 'public' has to contribute more to society than just exercising its rights" - [PMOH]Buck
HEY! Details! Sources!
March 30, 2007 - 22:59 ET by dahliatraversHEY! Details! Sources! Dish it!
Hehehe, "HEY! Details!
March 30, 2007 - 23:17 ET by JABHehehe, "HEY! Details! Sources! Dish it!"... for his opinion no less, now that's rich.
<shaking head> I still think God should have tied the reproductive organs to ones IQ.
<still shaking head> I believe I shall change my tag now, my old one is starting to feel outdated.
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful..."
Lighten up
March 31, 2007 - 08:13 ET by RJRosie is messed up. Her life
March 31, 2007 - 01:41 ET byRosie is messed up. Her life is messed up. Her head is messed up. She is messed up.
Great Britain has offered p
March 31, 2007 - 01:59 ET by Right2thePointGreat Britain has offered proof (presumably, Loran positioning readings
- do I sound real sailorly saying that??) that their boat and the 15
sailors was not in Iranian waters. Certainly this would be
helpful. Iran has so far refused to look at this evidence.
__________
Actually they provide a picture of the chopper from their ship hovering over the ship the party was inspecting with someone hanging out the door with a handheld gps which has an accurracy for that model of less than 9 feet position error.
Thank you.
March 31, 2007 - 07:02 ET by dahliatraversThank you.
I honestly think she's ment
March 31, 2007 - 04:57 ET by Jack BauerI honestly think she's mentally ill. And she's clearly an intolerable malignant narcissist -- so what else is new with these people.
But as I conservative I really have NO OBJECTION to her making her views known on the View. More power to us
What really pisses me off is that Walters and her bosses shamelessly stack to panel so that there is no real robust conservative refutation to her unhinged rants. No point is criticizing Hassel beck for not being what we want her tobe.
So O'Donut gets away, unchallenenged in the main, with easily refutable opinions time after time. In a way she encapsulates the bigger picture in the relationship conservatives have with BIG MEDIA.
We just want a fair shake, but they are determined never to allow that happen. I think that's why we get so frustrated with the continuing O'Donnell crap.
Not because she has the perfect right to make an ass of herself, but that there is no one to shout HER down, as she does to others.
Profoundly Disturbed
March 31, 2007 - 09:11 ET by allanfGood points.
Rosie is angry, petulant and appears unhinged. She does not use reasoned arguments, she blusters and bullies. Barbara Walters is remote and removed as she tries to shield herself unsuccessfully from the fallout from Rosies rants. Joy Behar is a gun moll type enabler who follows Rosie because she is the strongest thing there. Hasselbeck is sweet an clearly not the person to stand up to Rosie.
So what you end up with is the Rosie Show. If there are enough ladies angry and vacuous enough to enjoy the rants of a clearly disturbed woman the show will continue to do well.
What's next for ABC. How about allowing liberals to vent their anger by throwing pies at conservatives? Call it "Pie the Pig" The View is at that level now.
Yes, Allan, she substitutes v
March 31, 2007 - 10:08 ET by dahliatraversYes, Allan, she substitutes volume for accuracy.
Good point - it's "The Rosie Show" now. I wonder how Barbara feels about that?
The "view" needs a
March 31, 2007 - 09:27 ET by ThisnThatThe "view" needs a name change. Some possible options:
For the NB Gang...Pop Mech Response to O'D
March 31, 2007 - 10:21 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasThe link is a response to O'D by Popular Mechanics (no doubt O'D will b!tch it is all wrong because a. men run pop mechanics b. islamo-fascists weren't invited to participate c. some of the engineers are christians and so their ideas are radical and hatefilled) but either way the link is to the article.
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
But GAT, surely there are s
March 31, 2007 - 10:23 ET by Jack BauerBut GAT, surely there are some butch Lesbian mechanics out there that can put Rosie straight. If you'll pardon the pun.
This might be one of Rosie's Buddies
March 31, 2007 - 10:36 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasThe article did have a picture...nevertheless this could be the BUTCH BUDDY of Rosie to set her staight!
Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Good article, Guy. Excerpt
March 31, 2007 - 14:17 ET by dahliatraversGood article, Guy. Excerpt which supports the Building 7 conspiracy ( ... no, wait, it does the opposite. Darn.):
Tower 7 housed the city’s emergency command center, so there were a number of fuel tanks located throughout the building—including two 6000-gal. tanks in the basement that fed some generators in the building by pressurized lines. “Our working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time,” according to Sunder. Steel melts at about 2,750 degrees Fahrenheit—but it loses strength at temperatures as low as 400 F. When temperatures break 1000 degrees F, steel loses nearly 50 percent of its strength. It is unknown what temperatures were reached inside WTC7, but fires in the building raged for seven hours before the collapse.