NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, reporting on Saudi King Abdullah’s condemnation of America’s “illegitimate foreign occupation of Iraq,” decided to gratuitously bring up the fact that President Bush had held Abdullah’s hand when the then-Crown Prince was visiting Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas nearly two years ago, a gesture that resulted in much snickering from media types at the time.
Mentioning Abdullah’s critique, Williams suggested his hand-holding with the President in April 2005 was somehow relevant to his views on Iraq. “You may recall this visit by Abdullah to the Bush ranch in Texas and the closeness the two men displayed then,” the NBC anchor announced over two-year old file footage of the two men at Bush’s ranch.
In contrast, ABC’s World News anchor Charles Gibson settled for reporting Abdullah’s criticisms in a straightforward manner, while CBS’s Katie Couric said nothing about the Saudi leader’s comments, apparently believing they were not especially newsworthy.
Here’s how ABC’s Gibson dealt with Abdullah’s speech in his Wednesday night newscast, followed by NBC’s Williams on the same subject:
ABC’s Charles Gibson: “The U.S. role in Iraq came in for harsh criticism today from a key American ally. At an Arab summit meeting, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah called the American military presence in Iraq, quote, ‘an illegitimate occupation,’ the strongest words of criticism from Saudi Arabia’s king so far.” (18 seconds)
NBC’s Brian Williams: “One final note on Iraq. It comes to us from an Arab summit in Saudi Arabia today where the King of Saudi Arabia criticized what he called America’s ‘illegitimate foreign occupation of Iraq.’ The speech is making headlines because King Abdullah had been a strong ally to President Bush. You may recall this visit by Abdullah to the Bush ranch in Texas and the closeness the two men displayed then. His comments today are the harshest Saudi criticism yet of the war in Iraq.” (32 seconds)















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
President
March 29, 2007 - 11:15 ET by iveseenitallPresident Bush is a gentleman. Williams, because he is not, doesn't know one when he sees one.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
The MSM needs to learn......
March 29, 2007 - 11:31 ET by OldSailor88About foreign cultures. In Arab society it is common for men who are friends to hold hands while they walk. It is a gesture of respect. In fact, the MSM has had this in their own articles.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/04/27/eveningnews/main691413.shtml
Of course, what else should we expect from the MSM other than some school boy giggles. They're ignorant.
I'm with you OldSailor. When
March 29, 2007 - 12:04 ET by Senior ChiefI'm with you OldSailor. When GW was holding Pres Ford's hands as he was coming out from the hospital late last year, is the same thing what this picture above suggests. Frienship and respect goes a long ways. It could have been worst, if the leftoids and democracks asked which one of them is gay? Well, I just asked, didn't I. I have to, because it's in their heads. Go ahead all you leftoids out there, hit me.
As a Sailor and an immigrant, the above picture is indeed a sign of frienship. Where I came from, boys and girls (men and women) hold hands, and arms around each other without malice. I've seen this in other countries with no other meaning, but respect and friendship.
I personally don't think ou
March 29, 2007 - 14:11 ET by blogonatorI personally don't think our president should be offering his hand as a gesture of meeting their culture halfway when they don't respect ours by at least wearing western dress when in our country.
Blog,I disagree, about the wa
March 29, 2007 - 17:56 ET by BlondeBlog,
I disagree, about the wardrobe thing.
Put the shoe on the other foot.
Can you imagine what would be said if Condi Rice put on a burkha (or even a scarf, IMO), or President Bush wore robes and whatever (help me here) that thing the Arab men wear on their heads when visiting the Middle East?
Only the suck-up female journalists (a la Couric and Sawyer) wear scarves. Powerful women wear suits.
And why would the MSM make an
March 29, 2007 - 14:51 ET by Darth DutchAnd why would the MSM make any comments about this in the first place? First, Bush is expressing tolerance and diversity by accepting and participating in the customs of another's culture, which the MSM loves. Secondly, if they are snickering and sniggering, then it must be about 2 grown men holding hands and showing intimacy. Last time I checked the MSM loves the homosexual lifestyle and says that it's just as valid as the heterosexual lifestyle. So why would they even joke about that? Isn't that intolerant?
Oh, wait, I forgot, they hate Bush and will do anything to take a crack at him.
Dutch
First, Bush is expressing tol
March 29, 2007 - 15:51 ET by JDWFirst, Bush is expressing tolerance and diversity by accepting and participating in the customs of another's culture, which the MSM loves.
I watched the guy from M*A*S*H* last night say just that. An articulate intelligent individual who insists on defeat.
JDW
Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
King Abdullah Trying To Hold On To Power
March 29, 2007 - 11:24 ET by emjem24Saudia Arabia's King Abdullah is doing nothing but trying to hold on to power. His statement that America military "occupation" is "illegitimate" belies the support he gave us years ago. I guess the mullahs are really applying pressure as are the hard liners in his own country. The guy is nothing if not the typical hypocritical Arab dictator. I can't wait for the day when we find a way to wean ourselves off of Saudi oil for good.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
I just want to clarify a poin
March 29, 2007 - 13:18 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveI just want to clarify a point about your comment about "wean[ing] ourselves off of Saudi oil for good."
While I agree that we need to tap our own oil resources and reduce our foreign imports from all countries, there is a commonly held view that most of our oil comes from Saudi Arabia (and the middle east). This is not true.
Out of the top 15 countries we import from, Saudi Arabia is #2 for crude oil and other petroleum imports. However, less than 15% of the crude oil imported and less than 14% of other petroleum (from those top 15 countries) is from Saudi Arabia. When you look at all imports, the percentages of Saudi (and Mid-East) crude oil and other petroleum continue to drop lower which results in roughly 15% of our total oil and other petroleum imports originating in Middle-Eastern countries.
Unfortunately, the Lefties and environmentalists that block domestic Oil drilling and production keep us going to hostile countries to supply our oil needs. We need to pressure our politicians to grow spines and stand up to the environmental lobby and change our policies on domestic drilling and oil production. Once the steady flow of U.S. dollars to the Middle East dries up, hopefully the financiers and exporters of terrorism will have to be held accountable by their citizens and democracy can begin to take root.
"There is a time to take counsel of your fears, and there is a time to never listen to any fear." --General George S. Patton, Jr.
Enviros won't let us drill off Florida, but China is....
March 29, 2007 - 13:30 ET by RJExactly, Gene. But even worse, our leftist activists and cowardly politicos won't allow us to drill between the U.S. and Cuba. China is now helping Cuba go after the large deposits discovered there. Not only is that ironic, given China's horrible environmental record, but they'll probably figure out how to get OUR share of that deposit, too.
I don't see how this is med
March 29, 2007 - 11:39 ET by sarcasmoI don't see how this is media bias. Them hugging & holding hands was the first image that came to mind when I saw the king said that. A swing & a NB-miss on this one, IMO.
JMR
Gentleman
March 29, 2007 - 11:54 ET by cvgbuckeyeMr. sar: I respectfully refer you to Mr. iveseenitall's comment, which I believe is appropriate. Pretty well ALL of the media, the left(whats the difference) and many who post here, are clueless as to the existence and nature of gentlemen; of which I count President Bush.
I would submit that I am aware of NO ONE on the political left who could hold the athletic supporter of The President of The United States in this category.
Tell me where I am going wrong here or better still, who would that gentleman, from the media or anywhere else, be?
As a matter of fact, I fear that The Right's determination to stay to the high road has been very much used to beat us to death lately. We might do well to drop into the gutter and fight before it is to late.
I never thought I'd say this,
March 29, 2007 - 12:20 ET by waka wakaI never thought I'd say this, but Sarcasmo's right. Showing the footage is necessary in explaining the significance of the king's comments. Just saying "close friend" of the president doesn't go far enough in explaining the story. A picture is worth a thousand words.
I think NB is getting their panties in a bunch over this because THEY'RE the ones who're uncomfortable about the guy-on-guy handholding.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
Sorry. Already saw his comm
March 29, 2007 - 15:33 ET by sarcasmoSorry. Already saw his comment, but I still stand by my words. That image, without the help of a biased-I'll-agree news media, first came to mind. I call 'em like I see 'em: this was swing & a miss for NB -- STEEEEEERIKE!
JMR
I am with you, Sarc.It's pret
March 29, 2007 - 19:12 ET by Roger the ShrubberI am with you, Sarc.
It's pretty bad when even nutjobs like Waka agree with you. There an eclipse today or something?
I think Occam's razor would
March 30, 2007 - 06:45 ET by sarcasmoI think Occam's razor would say mediabias is just like news itself, and yesterday was just a "slow bias day." And another thing in the general "I told you so" department on this subject...Can we finally (follow sarcasmo's decades-long lead and) stop calling this dictator a "king" now??? Words are important. They have meaning, or else Fidel Castro is the "king" of Cuba.
JMR
Dan Rather holding Saddam's hand?
March 29, 2007 - 12:00 ET by Gary HallI just can't help my self Rich, but I seem to be remembering the scene that "one of the network anchors" described.. walking on a moon-lit night hand in hand with Saddam Hussein during their interview of the tryant.
Any snickering from the media then?
(;~> gary
Note: for the life of me, I thought the anchor was Rather, then possibly Brokaw -- so much coverage of it - that I can't even find it in the news.
Typical Liberal Non-Sequitur.
March 29, 2007 - 12:26 ET by mattmTypical Liberal Non-Sequitur. What a buch of juvenile B.S.!
These same propagandists praised Slick Willie when he kissed Arafat's ass.
Williams isn't worth the time
March 29, 2007 - 13:45 ET by bigtimerWilliams isn't worth the time of day...or night.
He likes to think he is..but don't they all?
Leftists are all alike.
Simply arrogant...or arrogant and simple!
Either way..same difference.
LOL!
Williams is a boorish oaf… what else can be said of such an ig
March 29, 2007 - 17:44 ET by PlaceboWilliams is a boorish oaf… what else can be said of such an ignoble act. What the hell is going on… move to the Middle-East Brian, they, or it seems someone there loves you.
If I'm reading this blog co
March 29, 2007 - 19:34 ET by BlameTheMediaIf I'm reading this blog correctly, Williams didn't snicker, the link refers to a letterman schtick. Did Williams snicker?
The fact that the Bushs and Suadis have been very close for a long time is no secret. This is such a non-issue, except that Abdullah is probably trying very hard to stay alive and in power, so he condemns the US, and at the same time shmoozes us. That may be hypocritical, but it's politics. And it's better for us to have him there than the hard-liners.