Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Tom Blumer's blog
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion
  • MRC Study: ABC and NBC Anything But Fast and Furious On Gunwalking Scandal
  • Bozell Column: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty

Kelo-New London Update: When Will the Media Cover the Project's Lack of Progress?

By Tom Blumer | March 25, 2007 | 11:41

Change font size:  A |  A
Tom Blumer's picture

The New London Development Corp. (NLDC) is the government agency charged with redeveloping that Connecticut city's Fort Trumbull neighborhood. Its actions in the mid-1990s gave rise to the now-infamous Kelo vs. New London eminent domain case, which resulted a 5-4 US Supreme Court decision that overturned two centuries of interpretation of the Fifth Amendment's definition of "public use." That decision enabled the NLDC to complete the process of evicting the neighborhood's former homeowners.

Having spent over $75 million so far, with, as far as I can tell, not a single new brick in a single new structure to show for its efforts, the NLDC has just told the state of Connecticut it needs more money (New London Day articles require registration after a short while, and a paid subscription after a week; HT New London Calling).

A second New London Day article notes that "The state's investment in the Fort Trumbull area in the past decade totals roughly $125 million, including the Fort Trumbull redevelopment effort and funding that brought Pfizer to the city."

Going back to the first article -- The state is, on balance, not pleased:

The president of the New London Development Corp. has said in recent days that the organization will require about $13 million from the state over the next few years for the Fort Trumbull project, over and above the nearly $75 million already invested since the late 1990s.

But questions about the NLDC's strategy — as well as the fact that state officials and legislators were apparently not notified of the agency's intention to request more money — have led to a polite but cool reception in Hartford.

The funds, NLDC President Michael Joplin said in an interview last week, would be used largely for infrastructure improvements and other work around the 90-acre redevelopment site at Fort Trumbull.

But the agency's ability to attract those funds from the state is still in doubt.

..... A state official who spoke on condition of anonymity, because of the sensitivity of negotiations surrounding the project, was more blunt: “Don't start asking for more. Show some results in the fruits of all our labors over the years. Then ask for more if you need it.”

..... (Joplin) said the $13 million the agency will request would be used for remaining infrastructure improvements and environmental remediation, as well as work on the now vacant Miner & Alexander lumber yard on Howard Street.

But those ambitions are troubling to others involved in the project, who believe the NLDC should focus on marketing and developing the parcels that have already been cleared and prepared in hopes of attracting private investment — the ultimate goal, they said, of the state's involvement in the project.

“You've got magnificent parcels ready to go,” one individual involved in the project said, an argument that echoes that of some of the NLDC's fiercest opponents, who had urged the agency to forgo seizure of the final private properties at Fort Trumbull and begin developing the vacant majority of the peninsula.

I have a sinking feeling that the area -- the one where the homes (pictures are here; scroll down) of Susette Kelo, the Cristofaros, and others used to be until they were ultimately taken by the NLDC -- is simply not as desirable as the NLDC claims it is, and that the now-empty lots where well cared for homes once stood before they were seized will still be vacant 5 years, and even 10 years, from now.

The national press, during over a year of on-and-off coverage of the New London situation, never bothered to tell readers that one property in the area was allowed to remain -- namely the high-powered, politically-connected Italian Dramatic Club (go to the map here to see how outrageous this exception really was; the Club is literally next door the Cristofaro property that was ultimately taken and leveled).

How many years will it be until the Formerly Mainstream Media takes note of the fact that the properties that were taken in New London as the result of a horrid Supreme Court decision nearly two years ago are still undeveloped? Will they ever notice?

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Share this
  • Journalistic Issues
  • Tom Blumer's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)
  • CNN suspends Roland Martin (Big Journalism)
  • Birth control mandate is unconstitutional (National Center)
  • Obama's Catholic 'problem' (S.E. Cupp)
  • Debt crisis not inevitable for America (Williams)
  • Catholic 'Obamacan' says he may have to reconsider in 2012 (CNA)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.