ABC anchor Charles Gibson teased his lead Wednesday night story by touting how “Al Gore goes back to Capitol Hill for the first time since the year 2000 and finds a heated debate on global warming.” But the broadcast network evening newscasts didn't get to the debate. They were too busy trumpeting Gore's cause and barely touching his critics. ABC's Kate Snow gave a doubter ten words before running a much longer laudatory clip from former Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill) which ended with Hastert calling Gore “a movie star.” When Gore demurred that “I just have a slide show,” Snow, far from exploring the “debate,” endorsed the premises of Gore's most dire ideas: “Of course, that slide show won an Oscar. And the man dubbed the 'Goracle' now jets around the planet trying to save it. Gore today called on Congress to freeze carbon emissions and figure out how to drastically reduce all greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. The message endorsed by much of the scientific community.”
With “Planetary Emergency” on screen, NBC anchor Brian Williams excitedly announced, “Look who was back on Capitol Hill today: Al Gore.” Over on CBS, Katie Couric celebrated “a lot of excitement on Capitol Hill. A movie star showed up to testify before Congress -- a movie star named Al Gore.” Gloria Borger recalled that “the last time Gore appeared on Capitol Hill was in his official role as Vice President, certifying his own loss in the disputed 2000 election,” but she championed how “he came back today as a winner, his popular movie, An Inconvenient Truth, grabbing an Oscar.” Borger concluded: “Gore could still get in late and run for President. Maybe that's why Hillary Clinton didn't gush all over him today like her fellow Democrats.” What excuse do journalists have for their gushing?
ABC's Snow and NBC's Chip Reid highlighted Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer's admonition of former Chairman Jim Inhofe for interrupting Gore -- “You're not making the rules....Elections have consequences” -- but neither bothered with any of Inhofe's substantive points. CBS's Borger, however, did: “There are non-believers, like Senator James Inhofe, who all but called Gore a hypocrite since he paid about $30,000 last year for his home energy. Gore's answer: It's not cheap being green.” CBS viewers than heard from Gore: “We buy green energy, we do not contribute to the problem that I'm joining with others to try to help solve. We pay more for clean energy.”
Not that you would know it from network journalists who treated Gore as an oracle, but even the New York Times reported last week how there's a backlash against Gore amongst scientists who believe he's exaggerating. On the MRC's TimesWatch site, Tim Graham highlighted the March 13 “Science” section article:
William Broad gave New York Times subscribers a surprise Tuesday, reporting that some scientists are "uneasy" with the soundness of Al Gore’s science in his movie and book, that some think "Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous." Broad found that underneath all the hype and the glamour and the Oscar, "part of his scientific audience is uneasy. In talks, articles and blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book came out last year, these scientists argue that some of Mr. Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous. They are alarmed, some say, at what they call his alarmism." For example:
"I don’t want to pick on Al Gore,” Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. “But there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we have to temper that with real data.”
The MRC's Brad Wilmouth corrected the closed-captioning against the video for the March 21 ABC and CBS coverage on their evening newscasts; I handled NBC:
ABC's World News. Anchor Charles Gibson teased his lead story:
"Welcome to World News. Tonight, Al Gore goes back to Capitol Hill for the first time since the year 2000 and finds a heated debate on global warming."
Gibson led, with “Global 'Emergency'” above video of Gore:
"Good evening. There was something of a time warp on Capitol Hill today. People might have been excused for taking a double take. What is Al Gore doing back at the Capitol? The last time he was on Capitol Hill, he was Vice President, there to certify the election of George W. Bush as President. Today, as Kate Snow reports, he was back to testify before two committees in his new role as an advocate on global warming."
Al Gore, at the House hearing: "I promise you, a day will come when our children and grandchildren will ask: What in God's name were they doing? Didn't they see the evidence?"
Kate Snow: "It was a reunion of sorts. Familiar-"
Gore, at the Senate hearing: "I so vividly remember when your mother came down the hallway and I opened the door and she looked at me and said, 'You made a good pick!'"
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT): "Mom was a straight talker."
Snow: "-at times, contentious-"
Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas): "You're not just off a little. You're totally wrong."
Gore, at House hearing: "The planet has a fever. If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that tells me it's not a problem.'"
Snow: "-but the discussion was, for the most part, civil. Most Democrats and Republicans agreed climate change is an urgent problem."
Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill): "I agree with you that the debate over climate change is over. The fact is you've laid out some things in places that we need to go. And as a thinker, as a personality, and now a movie star-"
Gore: "Rin Tin Tin was a movie star. I just have a slide show."
Snow: "Of course, that slide show won an Oscar. And the man dubbed the 'Goracle' now jets around the planet trying to save it. Gore today called on Congress to freeze carbon emissions and figure out how to drastically reduce all greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. The message endorsed by much of the scientific community."
Prof. Michael Oppenheimer, Princeton University: "I haven't heard any complaints from scientists who are actually experts on global warming. Quite the contrary, most scientists who know about the issue are really thrilled to have someone out there explaining it in plain English to the public."
Snow: "Today's hearing also produced a dramatic reminder of the shift in power on Capitol Hill."
Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma): "Why don't we do this: At the end, you can have as much time as you want to answer all of the questions-"
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Cal): "No, that isn't the rule. You're not making the rules. You used to when you did this [holding gavel]. You don't do this anymore. Elections have consequences."
Snow: "At the end of the Senate hearing, Gore asked Senator Boxer if there would be a little statue for him for his appearance, Charlie. All joking aside, while there is consensus now, a lot of them agreeing that there's a problem, very hard to find legislative solutions."
CBS Evening News led with a big cocaine seizure by the Coast Guard. Katie Couric set up the Gore story late in the first segment:
"Also in Washington today, a lot of excitement on Capitol Hill. A movie star showed up to testify before Congress -- a movie star named Al Gore. Here's our national political correspondent Gloria Borger."Al Gore: "Our world faces a true planetary emergency."
Gloria Borger: "The last time Gore appeared on Capitol Hill was in his official role as Vice President, certifying his own loss in the disputed 2000 election. He came back today as a winner, his popular movie, An Inconvenient Truth, grabbing an Oscar."
Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill): "As a thinker, as a personality, and now a movie star, you can come back with those general themes, those broad things and say, 'Do this.'"
Gore: "Rin Tin Tin was a movie star. I just have a slide show."
Borger: "Actually, he now has a pulpit. Gore is the nation's foremost environmental evangelist, and Preacher Al was here."
Gore, at the House hearing: "The planet has a fever. If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame retardant."
Borger: "Professor Gore showed up, too."
Gore: "The tilt oscillates a degree and a half on a 41,000-year cycle. There's a wobble-"
Borger: "But if presidential candidate Al Gore was in the room, he tried to stay above it all."
Gore: "We do not have time to play around with this. We do not have the luxury of making it a political football."
Borger: "But it is political. Americans now believe global warming is a real problem, so not as many Republicans are mocking Gore as they once did."
George H.W. Bush in 1996: "You know why I call him 'Ozone Man'?"
Borger: "But there are non-believers, like Senator James Inhofe, who all but called Gore a hypocrite since he paid about $30,000 last year for his home energy. Gore's answer: It's not cheap being green."
Gore: "We buy green energy, we do not contribute to the problem that I'm joining with others to try to help solve. We pay more for clean energy."
Borger: "Gore could still get in late and run for President. Maybe that's why Hillary Clinton didn't gush all over him today like her fellow Democrats. Gloria Borger, CBS News, Capitol Hill."
NBC Nightly News. The tease from Brian Williams, with “Planetary Emergency” on screen:
“Look who was back on Capitol Hill today: Al Gore with an urgent warning about what he called a 'planetary emergency.'”
After leading with the “constitutional crisis” over subpoenas, Williams arrived at the story:
“There were more cameras than usual on Capitol Hill today, as former Congressman, former Senator, former Vice President and presidential candidate Al Gore returned to talk about the subject that's been a life-long passion of his, the environment. Our report tonight from NBC's Chip Reid.”Chip Reid: “Al Gore spent 16 years in the House and Senate and today was welcomed like an old friend, bringing his crusade against global warming to committees in both houses.”
Gore at the House hearing: “Our world faces a true planetary emergency.”
Reid: “Just as he did in his Oscar-winning documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, he laid out his argument in great detail.”
Gore, in An Inconvenient Truth: “More of the outgoing infrared is trapped and so the atmosphere heats up worldwide. That's global warming”
Reid: “Greenhouse gases are trapping that heat, he said, causing everything from fierce hurricanes to forest fires to rising sea levels.”
Gore at the Senate hearing: “Nature is on the run.”
Reid: “If we don't act now, he said, later generations will suffer dearly.”
Gore: “They will ask, what in God's name were they doing? Didn't they see the evidence, didn't they hear the warnings?”
Reid: “ Some praised Gore, who held hearings on global warming in this same room decades ago.”
Congressman Ed Markey, (D-Mass): “What you were saying about environmental issues back then, now, retrospectively, really do make you look like a prophet.”
Reid: “But critics accused him of greatly exaggerating the threat.”
Congressman Joe Barton, (R-Texas): “On this point, Mr. Vice President, you're not just off a little, you're totally wrong.”
Reid: “And condemned his proposal for a massive tax on polluting industries. When Senator Jim Inhofe, who chaired this committee when Republicans were in charge repeatedly interrupted Gore, it took Chairman Barbara Boxer -- all four foot eleven of her -- to come to Gore's rescue.”
Senator Barbara Boxer: “You're not making the rules. You used to when you did this [holding gavel]. You don't do this anymore. Elections have consequences.” [applause]
Reid: “Gore's biggest supporters say he could do a lot more to fight global warming as President, but today he again told reporters he has no plans to run, leaving the door open just a little. Chip Reid, NBC News, the Capitol.”
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





"Good evening. There was something of a time warp on Capitol Hill today. People might have been excused for taking a double take. What is Al Gore doing back at the Capitol? The last time he was on Capitol Hill, he was Vice President, there to certify the election of George W. Bush as President. Today, as Kate Snow reports, he was back to testify before two committees in his new role as an advocate on global warming."
Snow: "Of course, that slide show won an Oscar. And the man dubbed the 'Goracle' now jets around the planet trying to save it. Gore today called on Congress to freeze carbon emissions and figure out how to drastically reduce all greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. The message endorsed by much of the scientific community."
“Look who was back on Capitol Hill today: Al Gore with an urgent warning about what he called a 'planetary emergency.'” 













Comments Policy
How Congress finds experts
March 21, 2007 - 20:42 ET by nkviking75How typical of Congress. Got a farm crisis? Get testimony from an actress. Want to learn about the global warming controversy? Call a politician, one who could not understand he lost in 2000 despite repeated recount losses. Talk about not connecting the dots... The Gorifice is a national joke.
nk-Just think if Algore HAD w
March 21, 2007 - 20:54 ET by ghotifunnk-
Just think if Algore HAD won in 2000...
He'd still be trying to figure out what kind of response would be PC enough after 9/11...
"Aactualllly, Sennnnator, it's bovinogenic global waaarming!"
("Man!" says Al to himself. "I can't wait to get back to that private jet and be home in Nashville in time for supper, then fly back here tomorrow after a nice, air-conditioned sleep in my own humble abode!")
<self editted note>:
Um... just a few random and disjointed thoughts...
This whole Global Warming sca
March 22, 2007 - 03:02 ET by BritcomThis whole Global Warming scam has gone on long enough. Here you will find a link to an hour long expose' on the hype being presented as fact by the UN and Al Gore. The video was produced for British television and explains in simple terms how the UN has cooked the science in a bid to saddle us with a UN collected carbon tax.
The Great Global Warming Swindle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
Algore's "testimony"
March 21, 2007 - 20:44 ET by ghotifunAlgore's "testimony" today, what little of it I saw, was nonstop bloviating. Simple "yes" or "no" questions were responded to by long-winded diatribes that didn't aswer the original question, had little point and were usually off-topic. If someone hadn't turned out the lights, Al would STILL be there flapping his lips.
Congressman Ed Markey, (D-Mass): “What you were saying about environmental issues back then, now, retrospectively, really do make you look like a prophet.” Way to keep an open mind, Ed, baby! Oops, I just saw he's from Massachuuuusetts! 'Nuff said.
I don't think its a prerequisite to be a prophet, but Algore sure can pontificate...
ghotifun...This is no laughin
March 21, 2007 - 20:54 ET by Clear thinkerghotifun...
This is no laughing matter. How long until he starts wearing a robe when he speaks about his cause?
I honestly think, that he honestly thinks he is a prophet.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Clear-Agreed. The TOPIC is
March 21, 2007 - 21:13 ET by ghotifunClear-
Agreed. The TOPIC is no laughing matter. The problem with the topic is that it is being broadcast to the world by a buffoon who is no more a scientist or understands scientific thought or principles than I have understanding...well one of his responses today.
nkviking said it best...Al Gore is a joke! But the biggest jokes of all are the goofy Demsms that invited him to this hearing with THEIR MINDS ALREADY MADE UP. Your mind's already made up, then WHY bother having a hearing EXCEPT to provide a stage for the one man who, above all else, was victimized by the 2000 selction process and is probably close to being the savior of the Demsm.
As far as I'm concerned, this whole farce was NOTHING but a big joke, waving gavels and all.
You're right, Clear! Saint Al to the rescue...
<self editted note>
I sincerely apologize for the religoius analogies laid upon Algore. It was heat stroke...
Scary to think he almost beca
March 21, 2007 - 21:19 ET by Clear thinkerScary to think he almost became president.
His loss is proof that there is a God.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Clear-How long until Algore o
March 21, 2007 - 21:24 ET by ghotifunClear-
How long until Algore officially announces his candidacy?
He certainly has had a lot of face time lately...
I have no clue as to what he
March 21, 2007 - 21:30 ET by Clear thinkerI have no clue as to what he is thinking concerning strategy, but my gut tells me he will announce within the next 60 days.
If my gut is correct, I think I will puke!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
A scenario for a Gore candidacy
March 21, 2007 - 21:33 ET by nkviking75I'm speculating here, but maybe Gore is trying to orchestrate a "draft Gore" movement to make it look as if the people are demanding he run.
If this happens (a little sea
March 21, 2007 - 21:39 ET by Clear thinkerIf this happens (a little searching on the internet would probably show that it's already happening) he would congratulate himself for proving that he is the new messiah.
Dennis Kucinich could force his hand and ask him to be his running mate. Could you imagine the two of them running the country...hehehehehehe!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Clear-Continuing with the rel
March 21, 2007 - 21:42 ET by ghotifunClear-
Continuing with the religious theme...
God help us!!!
ROTFLMAO!!!
nk-ABSOLUTELY!I've thought th
March 21, 2007 - 21:39 ET by ghotifunnk-
ABSOLUTELY!
I've thought the same thing since the Oscar's. And the scenario's perfect...
Algore, victim, yet savior. And soon to be doctor!
Now if he can just get by the ... Clinton's...
Clear, you need to tell your
March 21, 2007 - 21:40 ET by mandrakeClear, you need to tell your gut to settle down. It's like over a year until field is narrowed to a Republican, Democrat and Ralph Nader. If Gore is still in the running then puke..
Algore is a huge joke. It's m
March 21, 2007 - 20:53 ET by HumanEventsAlgore is a huge joke. It's maddening that we're forced to care about what this extremely stupid dolt has to say, since the media will promote it because he has that D by his name. Al Gore (Dumb) is more like it.
Planetary emergency! That's better than his No controlling legal authority. While George Bush is focused on the war on terror isn't it great to know that Algore is fighting to save us from the climate! And this is the same turkey who shouted like a psychopath, "He (Bush) betrayed this country! He played on our fears!" So not only does Algore think there is nothing to be concerned about with Islamofascism, but he is doing just what he accused Bush of (using scare tactics) with this global warming/climate change/planetary emergency/or whatever the liberal speak word of the day is!
What's interesting too is how Algore supposedly initiated the Nafta debate with Ross Perot in November 1993 and yet refuses to engage in one with this supposedly most important political, moral, spiritual issue that we have ever faced. WIth Nafta it was about the only issue Clinton/Gore had any substance on (I know there were also substantive reasons for opposing Nafta too. But cogent arguments could at least be made on the pro-Nafta side too. Plus, he debated Perot since he knew Ross acts like a belligerent child whenever anyone challenges him and thus Gore would look better in the debate based on Perot's rude behavior). And on this "issue" gore's substance is the size of a baby dust mite.
'HILLARY HAPPENS'
HumanEvents
March 22, 2007 - 04:17 ET by SportPoliticsWorse yet, Al Gore has a no way out scenario painted along with the IPCC and the Kyoto protocol.
At least Bush has said it will be a hard fight against the enemy, but we will win it.
Not Al Gore. He and his side,for the ultimate in fear mongering,have said that we will reach a point, now within 9 years,that the heat production of global warming will begin increasing at an exponential rate, that will indeed be unstoppable,and we will experience an elemental extinction level event,much like what wiped out the dinosaurs.
What is so horrifying here,is the runaway global heating he and his claims will happen,that will begin to literally cook every human on the face of the earth to death. That's what Al's friends and scientificos have said. I watched one on C-Span declare it. He had been briefing the congress on the issue for several years. I also watched Al Gore declare it.
The other part of it is the admission by the Kyoto protocols people that if everything was done perfectly according to Kyoto, they could not stop the uncontrollable accelleration of global warming.
So, we have an impending doom with no way out painted by Al Gore.
This of course "requires" the most dire of actions to be initiated immediately, with the hopes that some portion of the calculations have been errant, just enough that perhaps mankind can survive... if everything is done at the fullest possible ramped up immediacy.
Yeah, it is worse than the war on islamic fundamentalism - according to the democrats, and their presidential pick. Islamic fundamentalism may only be successful at wiping out a half dozen large cities. This crisis hinges with the EXTINCTION of the entire human race. Yesterday a moronic lib told me the "pentagon" believes it to be worse than the AQ threat.
That's not fear mongering,is it....
Once again,all I can say is they are LIARS.
Ok , lets try this on.All t
March 21, 2007 - 21:00 ET by Right2thePointOk , lets try this on.
All the present slate of candidates beat each other's brains out.
So the two sides draft Gore and Thompson, just a couple of "actors".
Would love to watch that steel cage death match.
Gore would make Tipper fight
March 21, 2007 - 21:05 ET by Clear thinkerGore would make Tipper fight for him!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
I've been watching Hollywood shows, the ladies would win
March 22, 2007 - 04:24 ET by SportPoliticsI've been watching Hollywood shows, the ladies would win.
That means it's Hillary vs Condi.
Gore, at House hearing: "
March 21, 2007 - 21:29 ET by Scout FinchGore, at House hearing: "The planet has a fever........"
And the only prescription for that fever is................................more cowbell!!!
More cowbell
March 21, 2007 - 22:13 ET by niner-four-whiskeyGore, at House hearing: "The planet has a fever. If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says you need to intervene here, you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that tells me it's not a problem.'"
The planet has a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
"A movie star named Al G
March 21, 2007 - 23:32 ET by MidAmerica"A movie star named Al Gore'
This was supposed to be a compliment but most mature people don't consider 'actors' as role models or authorities on subjects outside of show business.
But Big Al has a double problem. He's neither an actor nor a scientist just a political loser who could not carry his home state.
Um, listen Einstein, your her
March 22, 2007 - 00:10 ET by mrsimeleUm, listen Einstein, your hero Ronnie Reagan was an actor. I know your from "Mid America" and all, but gee whiz. Get a clue.
Also, all this trumpeting you see Al Gore doing? Yea, same thing your wonderful dubya did when he lied about weapons of mass destruction. That annoyed little feeling you have right now with Al Gore? Multiply that by 3000+ dead soldiers, and THAT is how the democrats felt.
Middle-America...lol
mrsgetaclue
March 22, 2007 - 00:35 ET by gfrrman"lied about weapons of mass destruction"? you need to get your head out of your *ss and face the truth. I guess they all lied huh? Democrats don't give a rats rear end about the troops!!!
July 22, 2003 - Larry King Live
Bill Clinton - I think the main thing I want to say to you is, people can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks.........of biological and chemical weapons. ...... And what I think -- again, I would say the most important thing is we should focus on what's the best way to build Iraq as a democracy? How is the president going to do that and deal with continuing problems in Afghanistan and North Korea?
We should be pulling for America on this. We should be pulling for the people of Iraq. We can have honest disagreements about where we go from here, and we have space now to discuss that in what I hope will be a nonpartisan and open way.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002
KERRY: “I would disagree with John McCain that it’s the actual weapons of mass destruction he may use against us, it’s what he may do in another invasion of Kuwait or in a miscalculation about the Kurds or a miscalculation about Iran or particularly Israel. Those are the things that - that I think present the greatest danger. He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat.” (CBS’ “Face The Nation,” 9/15/02)
Kerry Said President Made “The Right Decision.” KERRY: “George, I said at the time I would have preferred if we had given diplomacy a greater opportunity, but I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him.” (ABC News Democrat Presidential Candidates Debate, Columbia, SC, 5/3/03)
Well yes Reagan was an actor
March 22, 2007 - 00:46 ET by MidAmericaWell yes Reagan was an actor but he also spent some time as a governor.
3,000 dead troops? On 9/11 we lost that many citizens in one day. These nut/jobs had been hitting us for over 20 years. Who knows what attacks have not occurred here because we have taken the fight to their backyard.
What are you guys going to do when Bush leaves office? The dems can't lead. They can only complain.
I think I'll take my chance
March 22, 2007 - 01:00 ET by mrsimeleI think I'll take my chances with a Democrat. Kinda strange that nobody is allowed to question who "screwed up" on the morning of September 11th. How many trillions of dollars goes into the Airforce? Not just ONE building gets hit, but then minutes later ANOTHER gets hit, and then...what do you know??? The pentagon gets hit too??? Seems to me that leadership under G.W. Bush kinda sucks. Where was our defense that day??? I mean really, THREE DIFFERENT INCIDENCES??? Geez. Wonderful leadership. I can't blame the military because they take their orders from the higher-ups. Isn't it true that Condoleeza Rice was warned about something like jet-fuel-filled airliners could be used in a tragedy like 911??? Where was the support that morning??? Then there is that whole Cheney and NORAD scenario but I will spare you the details. Apparently you are in la la midwest. Sometime when you are bored...Google CHENEY AND NORAD.
You finally have a good point here msrimele
March 22, 2007 - 01:04 ET by acaiguanaYou finally have a good point here msrimele.
Yes, I agree that 9/11/01 was a total failure of government.
Now, what is your plan?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Um... mrsimmele --- waiting for the plan? Where is it?
March 22, 2007 - 01:09 ET by acaiguanaUm... mrsimmele --- waiting for the plan? Where is it?
Surely you have an idea on how to deal with Terrorists flying planes into buildings?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Um... mrsimmele --- waiting for the plan? Where is it?
Aww acia
March 22, 2007 - 08:53 ET by SportPoliticsAww acia, you were such a hardcore you made the liberal bail.
I'm not worrying, it will be back, lib liars always are. You won't ever get an answer.
Just for the record I haven't seen one statement by Mrs. I'm Extinction Level Event that was respectful.
Also, I see s(he) has stated that s(he) will knowingly take her chances with democrats. Nothing like gambling with all our lives, getting burned is not going to be fun.
Hater alert level 1 downgraded.
Thanks for letting me rant.
March 22, 2007 - 01:10 ET by mrsimeleThanks for letting me rant. I have no plan. I expect the folks in Washington to do that. I had FRIENDS in those towers on 911! Thanks for listening anyway. You are the first respectful person on here. I won't bother you or anyone else again on here. Thank You!! mrsimele
So what! One of my eldest s
March 22, 2007 - 03:58 ET by NL207So what! One of my eldest son's best friends worked for Cantor-Fitzgerald. He died with all the rest.
Another man, one for whom I had the utmost respect, we will call him 'Chic'. He had his throat slit with a box cutter because he tried to save a Flight Attendent on American 77 from the same fate.
Then we have some fake like you who complains that Trillions were spent on the Air Force, but they still were unable to stop the Hijackers. Since when has it ever been the policy of our government to shoot down hijacked civilian airliners? Yet, the Airforce you so malign was within minutes, some say even seconds, of splashing the 2nd WTC attacker. And Flight 93, had its passengers not crashed it overpowering the hijackers, would have most certainly been shot down a few minutes later. It took the Airforce about 20 minutes to get with the program on this surprise attack disguised as and hiding behind civilian hostages.
Should I complain that Trillions have been spent on social problems by misguided people who wrongly believe the government can solve social problems, yet many thousands die every year because of these social problems in spite of this expenditure?
The best you can do is claim Bush lied.
I think you are a liar. Bush lied? Give me one quotation from Bush that mets these tests: (1) The statement was false. (2) Bush knew at he time he made the statement that it was indeed false. Lest you think this is easy, I will warn you that it has been tried before by other lefty smart asses without success. I don't think you are near as clever as the previous loser was.
Monday morning quarterbacking
March 22, 2007 - 01:08 ET by gfrrmanMonday morning quarterbacking by the Amazing Kreskin. Another Truther...puh--leeze! Troll
Googling. And yet I still c
March 22, 2007 - 01:09 ET by Scout FinchGoogling. And yet I still can't hear past the sound of Clinton going "zzzzzzzzzzz" in the months before 9/11.
So, Bush lied, people died?
March 22, 2007 - 00:50 ET by acaiguanaSo, Bush lied, people died?
Um...
That's novel. Have you any other ideas?
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Yeah, silly little ol me. So
March 22, 2007 - 01:08 ET by mrsimeleYeah, silly little ol me. Somehow I thought it was the COmmander in Chief, Intelligence and the military that are supposed to KEEP something like 911 from occurring. Strange how nobody talks about that. Your President FAILED. On 911, during Katrina, and in IRAQ. Wonder why his rating is SO LOW?? Think about it. It's not just me. Wanna know why he was barely elected a second time? The country was helpessly buying into G.W. Bush's propaganda that maybe Iraq DID have WMD's. Oh wait, THAT was a lie too. Need I go on.
Ah, yes, but your plan? msimele?
March 22, 2007 - 01:10 ET by acaiguanaAh, yes, but your plan? msimele?
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
No plan. Read above :-) Tha
March 22, 2007 - 01:12 ET by mrsimeleNo plan. Read above :-) Thanks again for listening.
So, by your own admission, you haven't got squat to offer.
March 22, 2007 - 01:14 ET by acaiguanaSo, by your own admission, you haven't got squat to offer.
Just criticism and hatred of Bush. That's too bad. I thought you might have a plan.
I'm looking for a plan. An alternative that doesn't destroy my Civil Liberties (like Boxer did with Inholfe today).
Ah well,
I guess you need to go back to KOS where they don't have any ideas either.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
mrsgetaclue
March 22, 2007 - 01:17 ET by gfrrmanYeah they ALL were LYING.....grow up.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction." - Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 | Source
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 | Source
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
That was STUPID mrsimile
March 22, 2007 - 04:56 ET by SportPoliticsThat was STUPID mrsimile.
Bush was elected on less votes than Al Gore in 2000. In 2004 - on the RE-ELECTION - his percentages went UP - whipping Kerry by millions.
Yet you, the lying moron lefty, claimed he was "barely re-elected" citing why he was so close to not winning, taking the EXACT OPPOSITE conclusion that you should have drawn from the FACTS. His vote percentage WENT UP in the re-election - after his policies were seen in action by the American voters, not down, you ignorant moron.
Why are you lefty morons WRONG so often ?
Does "smart a**" mean more to you than actually being correct ? I would think, in fact I well know, a person could be a smart a**, yet still have the facts on their side when they smart off. Why is it,you foolish lefties smart off nearly all the time, but in your juvenile charade, don't even have the facts backing up your stupid smart aleck mouths ?
You know, I wouldn't mind it if what you spewed actually was supported by the widely known common knowledge facts. It would be funny then, and I could laugh, perhaps.
Instead, you are idiot smart aleck retards. Not funny, but stupid, perhaps deranged, definitely ignorant and careless, and pathetic. I suppose that should be good for a laugh, but the frustration your stupidity causes replaces any pity or twinge to laugh at you. You're just STUPID.
You know what else, it's an insult to the opposing party, that you are so dang stupid, and are so willing to open your yap and prove it. You would understand that if you were really a patriot.
That's right, silly you. We
March 22, 2007 - 05:04 ET by Jack BauerThat's right, silly you. Well done in managing to get one thing correct.
Your President failed?!
March 22, 2007 - 07:14 ET by HelenS"YOUR President failed??!!!"
Who the heck is YOUR president? To what lunatic in power do you give your allegiance? You talk about President Bush and the military as though they're some foreign entity and you are sitting under a rock some place peering out with your beedy little eyes looking for your own fearless leader to come along and tell you it's safe to ooze on out.
If you ever want to find out what's in a liberal's mind, better take a book along because otherwise you're going to be bored to tears.
President Roosevelt FAILED.
March 22, 2007 - 11:59 ET by i was just thinkingPresident Roosevelt FAILED. Somehow I thought it was the Commander in Chief, intelligence and military that were supposed to KEEP something like Pearl Harbor from occurring. Strange how nobody talks about that. Our former President FAILED. Wanna know why he was elected a fourth time? The country was so helplessly buying into FDR's propaganda about keeping us out of war, and then he took us into war by not preventing an attack on Pearl Harbor. Wait, I guess he lied about that.
I wouldn't go on if I were you.
If that is the case, then Ken
March 22, 2007 - 16:02 ET by BDIf that is the case, then Kennedy should have been similarly branded a failure for allowing Nuclear missiles emplaced in Cuba.
Truman should have been branded a failure for allowing North Koreans from invading the South in 1950, and later branded a failure for allowing Communist Chinese to counter-attack intot he south.
Carter should have been branded a failure for allowing the Iranian Embassy takeover.
Clinton? Boy, 8 YEARS of failure involving Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo, Serbia, Sudan, Yeman, NYC I, USS Cole, Khobar, and on and on and on......
MidAmerica - the msm all WANT
March 22, 2007 - 04:34 ET by SportPoliticsMidAmerica - the msm all WANT to be Hollywood movie stars. Let's face it, they put on a big act everytime they appear on TV.
They have almost given up the stupid "correspondent with the earpiece" voice inflection of power and understanding, since it became so damned phoney in the information age that made it look stupid and silly, but they still spew out lies so often, they need an actors face to maintain the ruse.
So, in the end, the greatest compliment they can give, is master thespian actor, and "rock star"(truth to power ever since Woodstock) - since either would have them in the position where the masses gloat and bow at their feet screaming aloud for their greatness and activism.
Yes, they all deep down inside desire to be the greatest of stars setting the world aright. They realize as newscasters they have a much smaller and therefore less important audience compared to the actors and decades old super rockstars. One of the Beattles, the big mouthed Aerosmith guy, the Snoop Dog, Liza Minelli, Rock Hudson, Bob Hope - all bigger stars - not to mention Angelina Jolie or "Bono" - activists for the cause - doing more than the liberal msm reporter could ever hope to do in their "restricted environment of unbiased accuracy" that is the journalistic institutional line, with far less viewers than Hollywood enjoys, even less than the dozens of sitcoms nationwide.
Be certain, actor and rock star are their highest form of flattery.
This whole Global Warming s
March 22, 2007 - 02:58 ET by BritcomThis whole Global Warming scam has gone on long enough. Here you will find a link to an hour long expose' on the hype being presented as fact by the UN and Al Gore. The video was produced for British television and explains in simple terms how the UN has cooked the science in a bid to saddle us with a UN collected carbon tax.
The Great Global Warming Swindle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
I've got a wallet full of Car
March 22, 2007 - 05:32 ET by old croI've got a wallet full of Carbon Credits. Made these up in publisher a week or so ago.
"Protecting the Environment' is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature."
- J. H. Robbins
BULLSEYE.
March 22, 2007 - 08:16 ET by stanleygoodspeedBULLSEYE.
There she goes again targetin
March 22, 2007 - 07:31 ET by ucThere she goes again targeting pre high school civics yet studied viewers.
Is anybody else getting dej
March 22, 2007 - 07:54 ET by Dave in TexasIs anybody else getting deja vu here? This all reminds me of around 1993-94, when Hillary Clinton was speaking before congress about what she was going to do to fix health care. Democrats were practically slobbering all over her like she was the second coming of Christ. I really remember seeing one clip with Dan Rostenkowski praising her with such zeal that I wanted to laugh and vomit at the same time.
Hopefully, sometime in November of 2008, we'll all be feeling deja vu again.
They [the corrupt] praise the
March 22, 2007 - 08:30 ET by stanleygoodspeedThey [the corrupt] praise the wicked and turn aside the just for a thing of naught.
Proverbs 28:4
They that forsake the law praise the wicked: but such as keep the law contend with them.
Isaiah 29:21
That make a man an offender for a word, and lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate, and turn aside the just for a thing of naught.
Al Gore is this week's pre-do
March 22, 2007 - 08:52 ET by stanleygoodspeedAl Gore is this week's pre-dominating antichrist.
1 John 2:18
Little children, it is the last time [eschatos hora - the lowest, or trying hour ... the hour of adversity] : and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there MANY antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time [eschatos hora - the lowest, or trying hour ... the hour of adversity].
Al Gore deceives the weak-minded ... he beguiles unstable souls.
2 Peter 2:14-15
(14) Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: a heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
(15) Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;
"....and drastically reduce a
March 22, 2007 - 09:47 ET by Mike1"....and drastically reduce all greenhouse gases by 2050".
That statment in and of itself is indicative of the scientific ignoramus Al Gore is when you consider that over 95% by weight of GHGs in the atmosphere consists of water vapor, which we couldn;t even begin to control. CO2, the bogeyman cited in all of the pro-global warming reports, consists of less than 5% by weight. Consider the notion that none of these psuedoclimatologists can pinpoint any direct correlation between CO2 and global mean temps, combined with the fact that CO2 is not a pollutant, is emitted naturally by the planet, and is totally necessary for all photosynthetic life, one can only scratch his/her head as to the debate that's taking place. Even we drastically reduce CO2, plant life would die. Even if we reduce CO2 from say 5% by weight to what, 2.5% by weight, does anyone really believe that is going to make such a drastic difference in our climate now and in the future. How much of the CO2 in the atmosphere si directly related to human activity as opposed to natural processes? What was the CO2 level back in prehistoric times? But I digress. katie Couric, Charles Gibson, Tom Brokaw, Al Gore, Laurie David, etc. etc. just have it all figured out.