As most of you know, former Vice President and soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore spoke in front of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Science and Technology Wednesday about the dangers of anthropogenic global warming (video available here).
What you probably didn't know is that the global warmingest-in-chief actually recommended a tax on pollution to solve the problem.
I kid you not.
*****Update: Prepared text of Gore's testimony is available here.
As ABC News reported (emphasis added):
I promise you a day will come when our children and grandchildren will look back and they will ask one of two questions. Either they will ask, 'what in God's name were they doing? Didn't they see the evidence?'" Gore asked. Or he said, "they may look back and say 'how did they find the uncommon moral courage to rise above politics and redeem the promise of American democracy?
Of course, Gore placed the burden of solving this as yet unproven crisis on America and Americans:
America is the natural leader of the world. And our world faces a true planetary emergency.
How should we solve this problem? Well, according to ABC News:
Gore suggested several proposals including a 90 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 — an aggressive reduction that critics argue would cripple the U.S. economy.
He also suggested that Congress raise fuel economy standards and enact a moratorium on any new coal fired power plants that don't include technology to capture greenhouse gas pollution and store it underground.
Isn't that special?
And, as you might expect, Gore called for Congress to create "pollution" taxes. In his view, taxes should be reduced on employment and production to make way for new taxes on the pollution one emits, mainly CO2.
I'm sure you can't wait to find out how much that will cost you in the future to solve a problem that likely doesn't exist now, and, according to most of the global warming skeptics, will actually be one of global cooling within the next couple of decades.
Of course, people like Gore at that point will likely blame that cooling on global warming, right?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
You know who'd be feeling the
March 21, 2007 - 15:12 ET by Old EuropeYou know who'd be feeling the pollution tax? The lower incomers. Of course Algore wouldn't care about any tax raise as he's filthy rich. Once again the Dimms show how much they care about the man on the street. Elitist hypocrites all of them!
Gore of course is wrong. If w
March 21, 2007 - 15:14 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveGore of course is wrong. If we implement the things Gore advocates, the two questions our grandkids will ask us are: 1. What was it like to have money and nice things like electricity and air conditioning when you were young? and 2. How stupid could your lawmakers have been to fall for the unproven junk science that guy peddled?
"There is a time to take counsel of your fears, and there is a time to never listen to any fear." --General George S. Patton, Jr.
In honor of Al Gore Day
March 21, 2007 - 15:28 ET by RJIn honor of Al Gore Day
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/
http://jewishworldreview.com/strips/mallard/2000/mallard1.asp
Kudos to Mr. Gore. Fascninat
March 21, 2007 - 15:15 ET by mrsimeleKudos to Mr. Gore. Fascninating to see a Democrat use the same recipe the Republicans used to instill fear in the World with the B.S. concept of a "War On Terror". Yeah, not a person, not an army, not a country, a TACTIC. Let's have an indefinite war on the tactic of TERROR! lol. Sounds ridiculous, eh? Well, now you know where Al Gore obtained his idea. American Politics is so interesting!!
Uh, either your profile is
March 21, 2007 - 15:20 ET by MightyMouthUh, either your profile is total B.S OR, you are a contradiction wrapped in lie packaged in an idiot.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
ah, the bitter Troll is back
March 21, 2007 - 15:32 ET by RJAh, the bitter Troll is back...gotta love the stupid "profile"...clearly, it's the lame Mrs Imele's narrow minded view of conservatives....Lemans and NASCAR....hahaha....what a dope.
Yeah RJ, I was heavily lean
March 21, 2007 - 15:39 ET by MightyMouthYeah RJ, I was heavily leaning towards the contradiction-lie-Idiot option. Thanks for verifying my initial thoughts.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
mrsimele...Glad to see you th
March 21, 2007 - 15:22 ET by Clear thinkermrsimele...
Glad to see you think that terrorism is so funny. Maybe you will get lucky one day and the terrorist will show up at your house.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Your logic then, suggests tha
March 21, 2007 - 15:40 ET by FastEdYour logic then, suggests that algore is totally wrong, right?
And, you forget that algore stated his "tactic" before the attacks of 9-11-01. So, it would seem, we learned from him. Logic is a beast.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Yes, I happen to know Mr. G
March 21, 2007 - 16:02 ET by mrsimeleYes, I happen to know Mr. Gore is full of B.S. Everything in America is about the mighty dollar. The Democrats want to produce income through the concept of environmentalism. The Republicans want to produce income through the concept militarism. If you consider the cost that environmentalism is going to cost the American taxpayer it will boggle the mind. However, for some reason certain people forget how G.W. Bush is doing the same thing in Iraq. Sometimes I think we would have been better off pulling a "Hiroshima" in Iraq and Afghanistan. We could use the population control anyway PLUS we could have eliminated the terrorist training grounds. This slow-guerilla warfare tactic is lame. All you have done is spray water on a beehive. Now the terrorists are really mad. Good job G.W.
Nice manifesto, but again you
March 21, 2007 - 16:15 ET by FastEdNice manifesto, but again your logic isn't supported by proof. Just saying (typing, writing, posting) the words, not a fact be. If everything was about the mighty dollar, we would imprison poor people, using what appears to be your logical "proof/fact". Another point of question - when does a demolib care about the american taxpayer? Almost finally, using the word "you" near the end of your rant, is to acknowledge that YOU don't like freedom as an american. Finally, the terrorists WERE really mad at us before GW.
History started before you realized that there was History.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Oh, come on. Don't be ridic
March 21, 2007 - 22:34 ET by UnsaneOh, come on. Don't be ridiculous. Just the other day I heard that in order to better deter crime in Houston, the HPD will be disbanded. After all, the only reason we have criminal activity is because we have a police department here...
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Yeah, MM was right... a contr
March 21, 2007 - 16:48 ET by steviep831Yeah, MM was right... a contradiction wrapped in a lie packaged as an idiot. wow.
End
March 21, 2007 - 22:30 ET by UnsaneThere IS a sure-fire way to see to it that there will be no more terrorists in the world, and that everyone loves the United States, using your Leftist logic.
End the United States of America, right now.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Sometimes, just sometimes,
March 22, 2007 - 09:51 ET by MightyMouthSometimes, just sometimes, I wonder: what would have happened had Lee gone towards Washington rather than fighting it out at Gettysburg?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Fool.
March 21, 2007 - 15:46 ET by i was just thinkingFool.
Slight difference, terrorism
March 21, 2007 - 16:30 ET by mattmSlight difference, terrorism is real, man-made global warming is fantasy. global warming swindle
Not that the Democrats have n
March 21, 2007 - 22:27 ET by UnsaneNot that the Democrats have never ever used fear as a tactic, re: the 1995 budget battles (I, being quite far from Social Security age, would dearly love to see the whole thing privatized, as opposed to you, who whines constantly about the oppression of liberty, and how badly you want everything in your life done FOR you by government...)
Tell me something:
1) If global warming is truly global, why are China, Brazil, and India, among others, completely exempt from the Kyoto Protocol?
2) Why do none of you Leftists ever take your whining to the Chinese embassy? They'll be the #1 contributor of greenhouse gases in 2015, after all...
3) Why is the issue of tropical deforestation adressed nowhere in the Kyoto Protocol?
4) Exit Glacier, near Seward, AK, has been melting since 1780 at least. What human activity caused it to begin melting then?
5) Why no major hurricanes last year, after an intense 2005 season?
6) Why do none of the guilt-ridden whiners who so worship at the altar of man made global warming support a move like that of France, which has shifted 78.5% of its energy needs to nuclear power since 1974?
7) Why was I chipping away ice on my truck in San Antonio in January? That is extremely rare under normal circumstances; in a warming world, it should NEVER EVER happen!
8) And while on the subject of TX and cold weather, can you explain why it snowed SOUTH and EAST of San Antonio for Christmas 2004?
9) Or, why it snowed in New Delhi and Lisbon in the winter of 2005-2006? Or why it snowed in Johannesburg this pasy July?
10) Why was the world's record high set in 1922?
In a hat tip to Noel Sheppard, please answer these questions soon, for I am breathless with antici..........pation.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
You know who'd be feeling t
March 21, 2007 - 15:16 ET by Old EuropeYou know who'd be feeling the pollution tax? The lower incomers. Of course Algore wouldn't care about any tax raise as he's filthy rich. Once again the Dimms show how much they care about the man on the street. Elitist hypocrites all of them!
mrsimele no offense but I'm
March 21, 2007 - 15:33 ET by radiofitz34mrsimele no offense but I'm going to ignore you. Because the GW sales job is in full swing. Al Gore is nothing but a false prophet. He can take his carbon offsets and stick it up his -ss.
Not only is congress wasting time and money (ours) on this but they are also wasting time on several fronts. The dems are trying to radically change the US government and ignore the constitution in the process.
I found it a bit ironic when Gore mentioned that we "defeated communism". Did we really? I'm not so sure about that.
radio - you got there before
March 21, 2007 - 15:49 ET by soosanradio - you got there before I could. I, too, know where I'd like to put my carbon footprint.... The true planetary emergency is that the religion of global warming may actually be able to destabilize economies. The Goracle has spoken. All hail the Goracle.
Any thoughts as to how we tax
March 21, 2007 - 16:40 ET by JDWAny thoughts as to how we tax carbon credit profits?
JDW
Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
JDW...I have no clue, but I g
March 21, 2007 - 16:59 ET by Clear thinkerJDW...
I have no clue, but I guarantee the Dems will come up with something.
I once heard that such a tax would be collected and distributed by the United Nations. When and if that ever happens, I'm loading all my guns and waiting for all hell to break out. They will NOT get a penney out of me.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
This is what I've been wait
March 21, 2007 - 15:36 ET by Dave in TexasThis is what I've been waiting for. It's been real easy for Al to scream "consensus", but now he's actually got to start suggesting solutions. USA Today had an article which focused more on his suggested solutions: Gore urges Congress to act on climate change.
Freezing carbon dioxide emission levels "right now, and then start the reductions."
If I claimed right now that the U.S. had frozen carbon dioxide emissions, how would Al confirm/disprove that statement? Do we even have procedures and technology to accurately measure our carbon dioxide emissions?
Using the federal tax code "to reduce taxes on employment and production and make up the difference with pollution taxes."
Um, yeah. Good luck with that Al. I'm sure something like that would be equally welcomed in states that receive most of their income from stuff like agriculture vs. states that receive most of their income from stuff like manufacturing.
Moratoriums on new coal-fired power plants unless they have carbon capture and sequestration technology.
And that would be technology that doesn't exist, which means no new coal fired power plants. You'd have better luck banning the sale of chocolate.
Keep talking Al. I'm sure you'll be as popular as the democrats were in 1994 when America started learning the details of their universal health care plan.
Freezing carbon dioxide emiss
March 21, 2007 - 15:53 ET by FastEdFreezing carbon dioxide emission levels "right now, and then start the reductions." - would be a nice thought - BUT, aren't we already in trouble with "todays" co2 emmissions? Didn't he say that we ARE in trouble, now, and that it might be too late? His flipping and floping is worse than a caught fish on the dock, or j kerry on any other day. My head hurts.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Breathing tax - $0.20 per qua
March 21, 2007 - 16:37 ET by mattmBreathing tax - $0.20 per quart
Belching tax - $0.05 per belch
Fart tax (mostly methane) - $0.10 each (no discount for SBDs)
Bloviating before Congress Tax - $100.00 per word.
Why do we as Amercians have
March 21, 2007 - 15:57 ET by worldleaderWhy do we as Amercians have to sacrifice? We aren't even the top polluter in the world on our best day. Tell China and India to quit it, of course they won't so now the stalinist Gaia worshippers are trying it on us. Knowing we have the stench of Liberalism in the majority of this society.
If they do not have men in wh
March 21, 2007 - 16:05 ET by bigtimerIf they do not have men in white coats readily available to take Algore away immediately after the Senate hearing on this phony issue he is riding all the way to the bank...he is in serious danger to himself and others not just in this country...but world-wide.
He is an absolute nut-case!
I just forced myself to listen to the exchange between he and Inhofe with a smiling nodding dutiful wife sitting behind the master of blowing nothing but hot-air...he did nothing but filibuster the Senator's time...just like he did this morning in the House hearing with those that had serious questions and a difference of opinion with facts...he never answered direct questions that were asked...never.
...but he has ConnieMacs he wants to develop...Green Mortgage Co. like Fannie Mae.. with carbon offsets for credit in building green homes ect..what a guy!
I could go on and on this guy is seriously mentally impaired...he is a joke as a human being as far as I am concerned.
I am furious with his BS...
Inhofe asked him about BREAKING RECORDS in Jan. all over the US he never answered, he asked about the over 100 scientists that disagreed with him...no answer....just filibuster!
I cannot believe how the media is not covering this...but they will later with a sound bite..now won't they?
Speaking of the media...while he was speaking CNN was having a segment about Green Ski Resorts....
These people trying to cram this down our throats are insane.
Btw...speaking of infuriating...Inhofe was complaining about him filibustering his time and Boxer held up the gavel and said if Inhofe didn't toe the line she would use this because he wasn't in charge anymore and elections have consequences!
What power...what a bitch.
Can anyone imagine what kind
March 21, 2007 - 16:25 ET by NortonalecCan anyone imagine what kind of taxes would be created if "Dr." Gore has his way? The list would be endless:plastic bags at the supermarket, HVAC, cars, the plastic wrap at the cleaners, diapers...
Almost anything we buy or produce could be found at fault. It boggles the mind, as well as scares the hell out of me.
Nortonalec
Thank You Professor Barnhardt
March 21, 2007 - 16:22 ET by Ten7s'Gore!' "Klaatu barada nikto!"
Here's another strike again
March 21, 2007 - 16:37 ET by DyneHere's another strike against Mr. Bore.
Dyne...Thanks for that great
March 21, 2007 - 17:12 ET by bigtimerDyne...
Thanks for that great information!
Bookmarked!
Alboar, what blowhard.
March 21, 2007 - 16:39 ET by CT"...when our children and grandchildren will look back and they will ask one of two questions ... 'what in God's name were they doing? Didn't they see the evidence?' ... or ... 'how did they find the uncommon moral courage to rise above politics and redeem the promise of American democracy?"
In other words if you don't see things my way you are immoral, blind, cowardly, a partisan and anti-democratic! Sounds about par for the new Democratic’s Party and if you don’t agree it’s because you are a denier!
Carbon Credits Smoke'em if you got'em!
Who is paying you Gore? Which
March 21, 2007 - 16:40 ET by worldleaderWho is paying you Gore? Which one of our rivals is giving you handouts to weaken our economy?
Another inconvenient truth:4,
March 21, 2007 - 16:55 ET by Gat New YorkAnother inconvenient truth:
4,560,000,000 years ago - The Earth’s age.
2,000,000,000 years ago - There have been 4 major warming and cooling phases over this time.
65,000,000 years ago - Dinosaurs died out
10,000,000 years ago - The beginning of the most recent warming phase
230,000 years ago - Neanderthals
90,000 years ago - Homo Sapiens
170 years ago - Second Industrial Revolution
23 years ago - Third Industrial Revolution
This morning - Gore warns that humans are destroying the Earth
The average Earth temperature during the coolest points has been about 53 degrees and during the warmest points has been 72 degrees. We are now at 59 degrees.
Are we so incredibly self absorbed that we, as humans, actually believe that we can have that much of an impact on this ancient planet in such a tiny period of time? We happen to be at a very early stage of this latest phase of warming.
Mother nature
March 21, 2007 - 17:21 ET by bigtimerAre we so incredibly self absorbed that we, as humans, actually believe that we can have that much of an impact on this ancient planet in such a tiny period of time?
GNY....
In answer to that question...Algore and his followers are!
Btw..he also said this morning the planet has a fever....
No Al...it's like this....
Global Warming is just Mother Nature having a hot flash!
This too shall pass!
Idiot!
I have a fever...and the only
March 21, 2007 - 18:00 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveI have a fever...and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!
"There is a time to take counsel of your fears, and there is a time to never listen to any fear." --General George S. Patton, Jr.
bring on the cowbell
March 21, 2007 - 19:22 ET by Pragmatic-ManBring on the cowbell !! Yes!
This map shows global populat
March 21, 2007 - 17:25 ET by mattmThis map shows global population density. Notice that human population is concentrated in the warmer regions. So, even if apgw was true, it would be a good thing...but it's not true, so...
Algore was right, the debate IS over: APGW is BS.
BTW: For those who might be interested in an alternate view of the age of the Earth.
For the past 30 years old Al
March 21, 2007 - 17:39 ET by Dan The Man 2For the past 30 years old Al has been in foreskin of GW. I remmebre him championing the Kyoto Treaty and the Senate pushing it through in a 98 to 0 vote, ohh wait the vote was 98 to 0 against. But he did say what a disgrace he thought the senate was, ohh not that either. But in his 2000 run for the Presidency surely I remember the cry for CO2 reduction, no I guess not.
Hmmm, what did Gore do for that 8 year period?
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
I believe that part of
March 21, 2007 - 17:53 ET by MidAmericaI believe that part of this GW thing is a desperate attempt by socialist true-believers to maintain their world view after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the capitalization of China's economy.
Even though they can't prove socialism is superior they can use GW to make the claim that capitalism is reckless and immoral.
Yup. I totally agree. I am
March 21, 2007 - 17:58 ET by mostlymoderateYup. I totally agree. I am not saying GW is a fiction; however, I don't think we know enough about it to stop living our lives. I like my life, don't you? I don't WANT to give up capitalism, do you? Screw these other countries when it comes to GW. Does America bitch at the Chinese and India about overpopulating the world? Do we complain to the African nations about spreading disease and filth? Stay out of U.S. business and we'll stay out of yours.
an interesting trans-party issue
March 21, 2007 - 19:25 ET by Pragmatic-ManI have noticed, that as Gory is beginning to peak, this issue claims strange bedfellows. Not a party split issue.
No, it is not a party split i
March 21, 2007 - 19:56 ET by mostlymoderateNo, it is not a party split issue. I happen to live in California. I know what these environmental-leeches can do. They destroyed our hunting and fishing out here with all their Nazi-like "environmental impact" propaganda. Would you believe me if I told you that they can close off entire 30 mile stretches of beaches for one little bird nest? Would you believe me if I told you they banned "kite-flying" in Southern California on some of the beaches because it supposedly messes up the flight of an endangered plover-bird? Environmentalists fight VERY VERY hard. The results they produce can be scary. Now if I want to hunt or fish, I have to go to Oregon or Idaho.
P.S. I forgot to mention the
March 21, 2007 - 19:59 ET by mostlymoderateP.S. I forgot to mention the most IMPORTANT part. There is evidence that the bird nest and the plover bird that I mentioned above were imported IN by the ENVIRONMENTALISTS so they would have an ISSUE to argue about. lol. Go figure...
That exact point is made 42 m
March 21, 2007 - 18:10 ET by mattmThat exact point is made 42 minutes into this video. (It's also been said by conservative commentators for the last 18 years or so.)
What did any of us expect out
March 21, 2007 - 18:16 ET by ryancurrWhat did any of us expect out of Algore this morning other than this drivel? He has staked whatever is left of his well being on this farcical load of garbage, so he will undoubtedly do anything he can conceive of to make sure his position still has some semblance of validity to the flock of Americans that are spoonfed daily by the MSM. The really dangerous thing about this whole argument is that no matter how many contrary articles are written, he already has the cheerleaders and support necessary to sustain this purely psychological assault against what is regrettably a good percentage of the American public. Either this cacophony is going to prevail, or Algore and his following are going to be finally shoveled into the trashbin of history for good.
I will admit, I am praying for the latter.
peaking too soon
March 21, 2007 - 19:32 ET by Pragmatic-ManGory is pushing this too fast. I totally disagree with the frenzy simply on scientific principles. But aside from this, his tactic is strongest-card every hand. If he stretched out his plateau over a few more years, maybe he could enact parts of his agenda. Ramming it down our throats so dramatically will not serve his purpose. Aside from the socialist flavor of Gory's solutions, my biggest worry is the compromising position so many of our top scientists have placed themselves into. If this tanks politically, they will be useless for the rest of their careers, questioned at every turn. Sad.
Dr. Gorifice as seen from the future
March 21, 2007 - 22:13 ET by nkviking75I suspect in about 50 years people will look back on Dr. Gorifice the way we look at the old medicine shows, or the doctors who practiced blood letting and used leaches. Either that, or he'll replace Chicken Little in future editions of the classic children's fable.
Gorifice trying to top Breck Girl?
March 21, 2007 - 22:19 ET by nkviking75Perhaps Gore is trying to one-up what John Edwards proposed in Iowa a couple of days ago.
Cause of global warming
March 22, 2007 - 01:56 ET by niner-four-whiskeyGlobal warming is caused by rich, straight, white men, usually protestants, because they aren't paying enough taxes.
Well, I'm not a Protestant, but IT IS ALL MY FAULT.
March 22, 2007 - 01:59 ET by acaiguanaWell, I'm not a Protestant, but IT IS ALL MY FAULT.
So, I'll just go into the kitchen and shoot myself.
<ht to 'Restaurant at the end of the Universe>
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
The Deceptocrats are showing
March 22, 2007 - 07:15 ET by NonanonThe Deceptocrats are showing their 'solution' for everything, raise taxes!
It is so tough to grasp to idiocy of liberals! It gets gets deeper and deeper.
If global warming is man-made (it isn't)and global, why is only one country expected to fix it? This shows there is no logic or science behind this latest push by liberals to force socialism down our throats, all the while the 'spokesman' for fixing the problem refuses to do anything different to assist the American people. Do as I say, not as I do. And we're told conservatives are the hypocrites!
It is amazing how many people fail to differentiate between coincidence and cause. Just because two things are happening at the same time doesn't necessarily mean one caused the other.
Taxes: the ultimate carbon s
March 22, 2007 - 07:57 ET by dahliatraversTaxes: the ultimate carbon set-off.
Raise taxes, excellent idea.
March 22, 2007 - 09:40 ET by dscottRaise taxes, excellent idea. Yes, let's raise taxes on the big residential consumers who use more than 2 times the average American household. I propose the following: All residential electric and natural gas consumption taxes should be based upon excess energy use. Any excess energy consumption will be defined as being twice the national average consumption. All consumption in excess of the threshhold will be taxed at the multiple of the national average rate.
Using Al Gore as the example of $1200 on 18,400 kWh per month in 2006. He uses 20 times the national average therefore his bill should be as follows: Assuming the national average at 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year or 890 kwhrs/month, on the first 1780, there would be no tax, on the next 890 kwhrs he would pay a 100% excess consumption tax, on the next 890 kwhrs he would pay a 200% excess consumption tax and so on. How long do you think Al Gore would continue to consume energy at his current rate before he both reduces his consumption and then gets off the electric grid?
Of course we can quibble about how much the excess consumption tax should be, but one fact remains, if Al Gore and the rest of the rich 15 million people would reduce their consumption, residential electrical use in the US (1,140 billion kwhr) would drop at least 50%, and that's a big number! 570 billion kwhrs Now tell me if the US wouldn't meet it's Kyoto targets if the rich like Al Gore would get off the electric grid.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
dscott...First I want a tax o
March 22, 2007 - 09:48 ET by Clear thinkerdscott...
First I want a tax on Gores mouth which has a larger carbon footprint than my 8 automobiles combined.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.