Just how crazy, you ask? Think of the wackiest global warming "fix" you can imagine. Then compile as many of those crazy ideas as you can and you'll have this AP wire report: Crazy ideas to combat global warming.
If anyone had any doubts how nuts the media has gone over global warming, let this article put those doubts to rest:
Crazy-sounding ideas for saving the planet are getting a serious look from top scientists, a sign of their fears about global warming and the desire for an insurance policy in case things get worse.
How crazy?
There's the man-made "volcano" that shoots gigatons of sulfur high into the air. The space "sun shade" made of trillions of little reflectors between Earth and sun, slightly lowering the planet's temperature.The forest of ugly artificial "trees" that suck carbon dioxide out of the air. And the "Geritol solution" in which iron dust is dumped into the ocean.
"Of course it's desperation," said Stanford University professor Stephen Schneider. "It's planetary methadone for our planetary heroin addiction. It does come out of the pessimism of any realist that says this planet can't be trusted to do the right thing."
This one is so good, you just have to read it all. Just when you thought we were supposed to be reducing our impact on the Earth's energy balance comes this:
A private company is already carrying out this plan. Some scientists call it promising, while others worry about the ecological fallout.
Planktos Inc. of Foster City, Calif., last week launched its ship, the Weatherbird II, on a trip to the Pacific Ocean to dump 50 tons of iron dust. The iron should grow plankton, part of an algae bloom that will drink up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Try to gloss over the dollar figures that have already been spent on these concepts or else you're likely to get very sad or angry or both:
NASA is putting the finishing touches on a report summing up some of these ideas and has spent $75,000 to map out rough details of the sun shade concept.
...One of the premier climate modeling centers in the United States, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, has spent the last six weeks running computer simulations of the man-made volcano scenario and will soon turn its attention to the space umbrella idea.
But the best for last - this one has got to be my personal favorite:
For far-out concepts, it's hard to beat Roger Angel's.
Last fall, the University of Arizona astronomer proposed what he called a "sun shade." It would be a cloud of small Frisbee-like spaceships that go between Earth and the sun and act as an umbrella, reducing heat from the sun.
...These nearly flat discs would each weigh less than an ounce and measure about a yard wide with three tab-like "ears" that are controllers sticking out just a few inches.
About 800,000 of these would be stacked into each rocket launch. It would take 16 trillion of them — that's a million million — so there would be 20 million launches of rockets. All told, Angel figures 20 million tons of material to make the discs that together form the solar umbrella.
But we inevitably come back to the cost:
And then there's the cost: at least $4 trillion over 30 years, probably more.
And that would just be covered by the government, right? Er, I mean, the taxpayer.
As a meteorologist, I closely follow and analyze the news that is published regarding topics in the world of weather and climate. I maintain a seperate website devoted to, among other things, climate change in the news. Visit and comment at Notes in the Margin.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well Jake, I'm dumfounded.
March 20, 2007 - 01:27 ET by radiofitz34Well Jake, I'm dumfounded. The moral and literal compass has been destroyed in favor of the age of applied paranoia.
We have people starving in Somalia, Eritria, Sudan and North Korea. And this is the best that people can do? Clearly humanity left by itself without God can do no better than this.
The artificial volcano. Wow give a kid a dangerous toy and look out! Hey let's see if this works...oops my bad, sorry about that Australia.
I am so sick of hearing about
March 20, 2007 - 03:06 ET by mostlymoderateI am so sick of hearing about Global Warmingl. Give me a break. The ego one must have to think that "we", the "human race", are capable of having such a catastrophic effect on mother nature. BS. Show me some facts that are legitimate and I will start worrying.
In the meantime, can we PLEASE have styrofome back? Remember the good ol' days when a big-mac came in a styrofome container? When coffee came in styrofome?
Petroleum products are everything. It's not surprising that uber-libs are against "everything".
From the article: “Many fe
March 20, 2007 - 03:19 ET by old croFrom the article:
“Many fear there will be unintended side effects; others worry such schemes might prevent the type of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions that scientists say are the only real way to fight global warming.”
Can you say understatement?
Also 16 trillion Frisbees circling the earth taking 20 million launches of rockets? I enjoy a good chuckle in the morning. I’m thinking of making this my home page so I can read it everytime I log on.
”It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do.”
- Jerome K. Jerome
I have to admit. 16 trillion
March 20, 2007 - 03:26 ET by mostlymoderateI have to admit. 16 trillion Frisbees circling the earth is really funny. I keep thinking about how dumb that idea is. It scares me how remarkably stupid somebody could be that is supposedly "college educated" and "an astronomer". Apparently they are still doing a lot of Peyote in Arizona. What's next? A ladder to the moon? I have heard THAT one before.
they will lose interest
March 20, 2007 - 05:42 ET by Pragmatic-ManLuckily, the sun-shaders will lose interest before following through, especially since it will be associated with NASA. Spend the money, put some highly specialized and extremely expensive devices in space at great taxpayer expense, then defund the purpose and gut the mission. If this sounds like the space station, bingo!
Cat's Cradle, Ice-nine, and Unintended Consequences
March 20, 2007 - 07:48 ET by RJI saw this article in Connecticut's leftist rag, the Hartford Courant. After I stopped laughing at the stupidity and gullibility of leftist AGW scare-mongers, I thought of an old book, Cat's Cradle, by an old leftist, Kurt Vonnegut, and The Law of Unintended Consequences
In that book, a new product called Ice-nine turned room-temperature water to ice and it was hailed as a great discovery (can't remember why). But eventually, it spread uncontrollably and froze all water on the planet, killing all life. These dumb ideas, if implemented, could do the same.
Along those lines, there's an idea floating around for creating "clean and free energy" by tapping our molten core with thousands of wide and deep "heat wells." Sheesh!
I had the same thought. After
March 20, 2007 - 07:55 ET by danboI had the same thought. After they launch all those frisbies. Then the climate reverts to cooling. Someone will have to retrieve them. To keep the planet from going into a real cool down.
This hysteria never ceases to amaze me.
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H.L. Mencken
Theoretically, I guess we cou
March 20, 2007 - 07:32 ET by GalvanicTheoretically, I guess we could construct a ladder to the moon from bucky tubes. Even that sounds more feasible than launching 16 trillion orbital Frisbees.
We need to wake up on this issue
March 20, 2007 - 03:32 ET by garynickGet Environment info from an independent source COA News
Time to wake up!
What does that 'independent
March 20, 2007 - 05:07 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsWhat does that 'independent' source COA News stand for?
Communists Of America?
Cancel Out America?
Costs Only to Americans?
Cannot Objectively Assess?
Sheesh.
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
belag's favorite "consensus" website
March 20, 2007 - 07:29 ET by RJCOA = belag's favorite "consensus" website
A new troll. How nice.
March 20, 2007 - 07:40 ET by Dave RJust what we need around here. Another Marxist/Leninist America-hating troll giving us links to yet another Marxist/Leninist America-hating site run by Marxist/Leninist America-hating enviro-kook fern-fondlers.
Did they add a third shift down at the troll factory?
This republic will not survive the continued neglect of its people.- Neal Boortz.
lol
March 20, 2007 - 20:10 ET by dahliatraverslol
he he
March 24, 2007 - 02:52 ET by garynickmarxist leninist? I would like to see one article promoting marxist leninist points of view. People label something when they can't argue rationally.
Currents of Awarness
March 24, 2007 - 02:50 ET by garynickI believe it stands for Currents of Awareness. I think this is in that it is a network of indepedent (from government and corporations) media, so the idea is that each organization is like a current of awareness about the world.
difficult to stomach
March 20, 2007 - 05:33 ET by Pragmatic-ManSo, allow me to deconstruct, as if it warrants my energy. Dumping a leaching metal into the ocean en masse is not harmful to the environment? Try dumping 50 tons of iron dust in Manhattan and watch the EPA hunt you down. Then, they will surely complain about how harmful global warming is to the fish populations that are being decimated with "rust-gill" syndrome, or some harmful effect brought on by breathing water with severely high concentrations of iron oxide. This will drastically alter the pH of the local seawater at the dumpsite, likely producing a kill effect upon the plankton.
And as for the sun shade, wasn't it volcanic ash in the upper atmosphere that is attributed to the extinction of the last great dominant species 65 million years ago? What will the agri business do when the sun is gone? Do these people think past the end of their noses?
"rust-gill" syndrom
March 20, 2007 - 20:17 ET by dahliatravers"rust-gill" syndrome
Each fish with rust-gill syndrome would have to be hand cleaned, sort of the way they clean seagulls and otters after an oil spill.
By the way, wouldn't the 20m launches it would take to put the umbrellas into orbit just be adding to global warming? I don't think you people have thought all of this through.
Anyone remember when Mount
March 20, 2007 - 05:53 ET by motherbeltAnyone remember when Mount St. Helens erupted, and Mount Pinatubo? Both times the atmosphere was supposed to be ruined for decades, trapping CO2, causing extremely high temps, skin cancer and numerous other ills? Well, Mother Nature cleaned up after herself both times, in fairly short order, compared to what the GW cult predicted.
Global Warming is easy enough
March 20, 2007 - 06:49 ET by Cool ArrowGlobal Warming is easy enough to solve.
Just elect a Dem President and the problem will go away in the same manner the "Homeless Crisis" disappeared when Clinton replaced Bush I.
My gosh, Riled One, finally - a reason to vote for a Democrat.
March 20, 2007 - 07:54 ET by acaiguanaMy gosh, Riled One, finally - a reason to vote for a Democrat.
Than k s.
:-)
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
20Million Launches
March 20, 2007 - 07:09 ET by ecnirPWhat, exactly, would be the carbon footprint of 20 million rocket launches, and can Mr. Gore's firm provide enough carbon offsets to be donated to the cause?
I'll take the actual expenditure of money on these kooky ideas as another indicator that the AGW tide has turned. And when it turns out that they're dead wrong, how can we hold these people accountable for the environmental damage they cause?
Just think of all the billboa
March 20, 2007 - 07:44 ET by Cool ArrowJust think of all the billboard space on those umbrellas. The cure could pay for itself in advertising.
"Islam is a peaceful religion"
"It don't rain in Indianapolis"
The list goes on.
Okay, this is the first time
March 20, 2007 - 10:03 ET by rubylensOkay, this is the first time I've felt actual fear about humans possibly irrevocably damaging the earth. If people actually do stuff like this, I have no doubt that they'll do tremendous harm. I still think the earth is big enough and complex enough to correct most of what we might do to it, but this stuff is just foolhardy in the extreme! Clearly a case of the "cure" being worse than the perceived "disease."
For some sobering cost-benefi
March 20, 2007 - 11:31 ET by GalvanicFor some sobering cost-benefit analysis of Global Warming and the fixes (e.g. Kyoto), I recommend Bjorn Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist. Lomborg, a professor of statistics in Denmark, illustrates how heavy investment in the wrong 'solutions' is more catastrophic to human existence, than none at all.