He's harmless. His being on the show is also part of Faux News' master plan, which is to give people like him a venue to show how out of touch with reality they really are.

Like you, my first thought was get rid of him. But, on second thought, keep him as long as he wants to stay there so that he can continue to show what a fool he is as he suffers with his BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome), CDS (Cheney...), RDS, (Republican..) and whatever other derangement syndromes take him over.

Just my $0.02

You only wish you were a conservative joe.

Just by you saying that proves just how far left you are. Most of us conservatives think Fox is too far to the left for our taste, but admit that it's closer to the center than any other news outfit. That being said, Fox (along with so many other stations) continues the charade of the Valarie Plame non-story and won't dig deep to show that she is lying. They're not far enough right for most conservatives.

Joe, you need to change your last name to Stalin.

____________________________________________________

"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." ~ Thomas Paine

LOL! I hate to break this to you, Joey, but if you bothered to visit the "Faux News" website, you'd find that they get most of their news from the Associated Press. By your "logic", then, AP is propaganda as well.

But your real problem is that unlike "Faux News", CNN has actually been discredited by several MAJOR journalistic scandals.

1. "Tailwind" in 1998

2. CNN Baghdad Bureau-CNN ignores and never reports atrocities by Saddam Hussein against his own people-just so they could keep their Baghdad Bureau open.

3. 2005: CNN head man Eason Jordan resigns in disgrace after falsely accusing US troops of "murdering" journalists in Iraq

4. 2005: CNN flashes a large black "X" over Vice President Dick Cheney's face during live coverage of a speech he was giving. CNN later fires a CNN switchboard operator after said operator said that the act was intentional and was in fact an example of "free speech".

5. 2006: CNN is temporarily banned from Iraq after mistranslating a speech by Iran's President.

6. 2006: CNN broadcasts videos of Iraqi insurgent snipers targeting and killing US soldiers, thus acting as a propaganda outlet for said insurgents.

Can you give us CREDIBLE examples of "Faux News" committing such blatant examples of propaganda? I'll be here waiting.

PS, my source for the above examples wasn't some right wing site, but Wikipedia. Sorry to disappoint you!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

Your hatred for anyone not a Socialist like you is showing again.

You simply cannot tolerate conservative viewpoints being aired or given a legitimate hearing anywhere, because when they are presented it exposes the intellectual bankruptcy of your own beliefs.  Therefore, rather than deal with the existence of Fox News, you desperately want to shut them up.

Besides, I cannot understand this overwhelming, intense, palpable, irrational FEAR that Leftist have of a news channel that might, on a busy news day, reach a million people in a nation with 300 million people.  They have the exact same flaws as other media outlets (the sensationalizing of crime stories that 20 years ago would have only been something for local affiliates, for one example; the refusal to cover international events, for another), after all.

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

CNN and Peter Arnett nuff said:) NBC Dateline and exploding cars (1990) Nuff Said:)  So Joe tell when and where Fox News had to retract a story because it puposedly constructed false stories? Face it Joe Stalin if you had your way there would be conservative media. You would shut down Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, Newbusters and every other conservative media outlet because Joe you are too scared too allow other viewpoints other than liberal viewpoints. Liberal version of free speech. Everyone is allowed to speak freely except those that disagree with liberalism

Absolutely correct-comparing  Air America to "Faux News" in terms of ratings is like comparing a weather balloon to the Goodyear blimp.

By the way, the latest on the Air America front is that they just lost their affiliate in Bubba land, namely Little Rock Arkansas. They are also losing the affiliate in ABQ, New Mexico, if I'm not mistaken.

Fox may seem biased only when one listens to CCCN, CBS, etc. It really is more in touch with the basics of the U.S. Journalists have long been much more left than the principles of this country.

Gabler is a typical liberal. Rails against "The Man", but doesn't have the integrity to walk away from a paycheck.

Individual liberty is directly proportional to individual responsibliity.

Fox doesn't legitimize Gabler - Fox itself is not legitimate.  Gabler does more to legitimize Fox.

I used to think Jimmy Carter was the worst president in history - then along came George W. Bush.

Cunservative, for your info Fox's numbers are actually in decline, they certainly appear to have peeked at a nightly audience of around two million. The democrats seem to have stumbled on a strategy to confine them to this little ghetto of around two mill versus the collective audience for the MSM of around 27 million. Murdoch may be happy with this since his whole show is based on the premise that there is a demographic out there of extreme right wingers who will lap up whatever intelligent and objective commentary Hume and Barnes can provide, but then he might not since at some point his advertisers are not going to be satisfied. Who can tell. The democrats strategy is actually potentially very effective. No cooperation, no participation, seems a sensible response since no one pretends that they are going to get anything approaching a unbiassed reaction from Fox. Much better to pigeon hole it as the press office of the RNC which it is more or less. That way a fairly tiny minority end up talking to themselves. A bit like this site really.