The media’s historical omission of Clinton’s mass dismissal of 93 U.S. Attorneys has led to demands on the MRC archive for footage of Janet Reno’s declaration of the act – and our staff found an April 12, 1993 CNN special report where reporter Ken Bode called it a “one-day clean sweep.” Reno declared: “I have asked for their resignations at the request of the President…It’s important that we build a team that reflects our desire to have a Justice Department marked by excellence, marked by diversity, marked by professionalism, and integrity. I want teamwork where we’re both interested in achieving justice throughout America.” Video clip: Real (1.7MB) or Windows (1.9MB) plus MP3 (295KB).
Bode’s report as a whole earned our old “Janet Cooke Award” that month for slanting dramatically against the Reagan-Bush Justice Departments, allowing Reno to defend herself, but not GOP attorneys general Ed Meese or William Barr. As we wrote at the time:
Bode's story moved on to Clinton: "Clinton's first public office was Attorney General of Arkansas. He was aggressive, high- profile, populist...If the Justice Department will reflect President Clinton's policies, expect the new attorney general to be much stronger on civil rights enforcement, pay attention to environmental laws, support the rights of children, and a continued emphasis on crime and public safety." Bode aired no one taking issue with Clinton's years in Arkansas or his present policies.
Bode ended on a properly even-handed note, suggesting that Janet Reno's firing of 93 U.S. attorneys "raises suspicions that the Clinton administration is willing to put politics above enforcing the law." Bode let fired U.S. Attorney Jay Stephens charge politics were involved in taking him off the investigation of House Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski. He also concluded that the Rostenkowski probe "has become a highly visible test of how political the Justice Department will be under Bill Clinton and Janet Reno." But Bode interviewed Reno and let her declare herself non-political in three soundbites. That's very unlike his treatment of Reagan-Bush officials, who were simply left out.
But much of the report was a harsh critique of conservative politicization of the justice system:
Bode selected an increasingly popular target, the Reagan and Bush Justice Departments: "For the last decade, the Justice Department was an ideological warehouse for conservative thinkers. At the same time, Justice became a political arm of the White House." Bode aired sound bites from Donald Ayer, a disgruntled former Justice official, and Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Bode explained: "The Department of Justice will always reflect the policy priorities of a President, but the Reagan-Bush Department went further, undermining laws the administration opposed."
Bode caricatured the GOP record: "The Reagan-Bush agenda included a hard line on abortion, a rollback on civil rights -- trying to restore tax credits for segregated schools, for example -- also attempts to minimize affirmative action requirements." To explain this, Bode brought on liberal Ralph Neas of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. He aired no one defending Reagan policies.
Bode also underlined liberal charges that the Reagan-Bush GOP had a racist pattern of punishing black politicians in political corruption cases, and a lax approach to S&L fraud -- a rich critique compared to the Whitewater File Shredders who came next. The man who's number two to Al Gonzales now gave me a rebuttal back then to the charge of right-wing politicization:
Former Justice official Paul McNulty replied to MediaWatch: "What about the 1960s? Was the Johnson administration politicized because it 'undermined' racist laws? In the 1980s, we wanted to bring on reforms as well -- to correct oppressive regulation, restore a sounder reading of the Constitution, question discriminatory civil rights laws. Every administration is suppose to advocate policies in legislation and in judicial advocacy."
That sounds like a much better answer than what we’re hearing today.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center
Comments Policy
It’s important that we bu
March 14, 2007 - 15:34 ET by motherbeltIt’s important that we build a team that reflects our desire to have a
Justice Department marked by excellence, marked by diversity, marked by
professionalism, and integrity. I want teamwork where we’re both
interested in achieving justice throughout America.”--AG Janet Reno
I'm sorry, was she saying that the Justice Department under President George H.W. Bush was marked by mediocrity, was racist and/or sexist, and lacked both professionalism and integrity? Oh, and just for good measure, was not interested in achieving justice?
Sure sounds like it to me. But then again, this was the administration that couldn't just fire the Travel Office staff and say they wanted to appoint their own staff. They had to say they were being fired because of fraud and other criminal acts.
Right wing hot air
March 14, 2007 - 15:44 ET by banditThis issue threatens you rightie hacks soooo much. I haven't seen so many omissions and half truths in a while. Your entire argument is based on the '93 replacements? You gotta be kidding. You claim Carter and Reagan kept hold overs when they took power and that those were gradually replaced. How many and how fast? You leave out what Bush Sr and Bush Jr did when they came in. You very carefully dance around what Johnson and Ford did. You don't touch the partisian political reasons these eight were let go. I've noticed that not one GOP Senator or Congressman has used this paper thin argument. Only you spin hacks have. Same ol' playbook... just try to muddy the waters as much as you can, avoid the real issue, always hit Clintons.
Bye bye Alberto.
PS Save the echo chamber cut and paste linked responses. I've already read them.... not impressed.
I am confused. Most every pre
March 14, 2007 - 15:55 ET by Roger the ShrubberI am confused. Most every president does this, right?
Why is it such a big deal now?
What's the real issue, Bandido? That Bush had people who didn't whistle his tune got axed? Isn't that the norm for most every administration? Why is the media blowing this up, but didn't when Clinton did it? Oh wait, that would explain the purpose of this website, wouldn't it? I believe that is the "issue" many of us on this site is having. Not that Clinton fired 93 attorneys, but the media coverage (or lack thereof).
People should be more pissed off that Bush didn't fire everybody like his predecessors did. Clinton and Bush are the same. Bush screwed up by not cleaning house when he came into office.
I do not expect you to agree ot concur, of course, knowing your political bent. I am sure you are one of the few Liberals mentioned in the Zogby poll who believe in the Vast Right-Wing Media Conspiracy.
Don't expect a reply from b
March 14, 2007 - 16:12 ET by MightyMouthDon't expect a reply from bandit Roger, He's like a bum that walks out of an alley to piss on your street corner and then walks away without a word when you ask him: "why?"
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Why reply to him? What a moro
March 14, 2007 - 16:14 ET by ThisnThatWhy reply to him? What a moron.
Wait!I have found roger to
March 14, 2007 - 16:19 ET by MightyMouthWait!
I have found roger to be very intelligent! I don't think it is fair to call him a moron!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Roger's intelligent enough to
March 14, 2007 - 16:38 ET by ThisnThatRoger's intelligent enough to know I didn't call him a moron...
I know buddy, I just don't
March 14, 2007 - 16:42 ET by MightyMouthI know buddy, I just don't use the <snark>comment</snark> tags. :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I need another tissue from al
March 14, 2007 - 16:45 ET by Roger the ShrubberI need another tissue from all the hatemongering I am experiencing here today.
**sniff sniff**
Anyone have any Midol?
:p
Look what I started... Just
March 14, 2007 - 16:49 ET by MightyMouthLook what I started... Just not my day. But on the lighter side I came up with a new word at the end of the open thread! :-)
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
A tissue. http://www.istockph
March 14, 2007 - 16:51 ET by ThisnThatA tissue. http://www.istockphoto.com/file_closeup/who/facial_expressions/sadness/1661793_handing_out_a_tissue.php?id=1661793
tnt...With all due respect, I
March 14, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Clear thinkertnt...
I am withdrawing my stupid remarks, I too thought you were going after Rog.
Please forgive me.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/
March 14, 2007 - 16:44 ET by ThisnThatThat's alright. Sandboxes can be fun, or even good for dinner.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bryce/187915750/
I'm guessing that's your chil
March 14, 2007 - 16:58 ET by Clear thinkerI'm guessing that's your child in the sand box. No wonder you weren't offended by my stupid remark, beautiful kid you have there.
The last part of your post scares me, I hope you don't eat kids you find in sandboxes :-0
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
I will try and make it simple
March 14, 2007 - 16:59 ET by IntenzityI will explain to those who feel this is a non-issue exactly why it is an issue, and why everyone should care.
As has been reported in virtually every article about this story, when a President enters office he usually replaces all the US Atty.'s. And here is the important point - when he enters office.
Let me repeat that - when he enters office - as in the oft mentioned firing by Clinton/Reno during 1993.
What was the first year of Clintons first term? 1993. He gave his inaugural speech in January, and started the firing in April, within months of entering office.
Now, what Bush has done is selectively replace Atty's, not at the beginning of his term, and not replacing every Atty, just the 8 that have indicted Republicans or caused other problems for his admin near the end of his second term of office.
This is the issue - it is not the number of atty's fired, (gotta make sure to mention how many Ol Bill fired so a small number like 8 doesn't sound so bad in every story), it is when and why and how they were fired.
So to summarize - the issue is not how many, it is when and why a selective group were fired. The story is not 8 vs. 90-something atty's fired, it is first term new president vs. political purge of non-party liners during the last half of the last term of a president.
If this was the first quarter of the first term of the Bush presidency, then agreed, this would be a non-story.
But it isn't, so this (hopefully) will be another brick torn out of the wall of fascism that has been built by these clowns over the last 7 years.
Gonzales's days are so numbered, the more Bush denies he is going to fire him, the quicker I would be cleaning out my office if I were Roberto. Go ask Donny Rumsfeld about that one.
"So to summarize - the
March 14, 2007 - 17:06 ET by MightyMouth"So to summarize - the issue is not how many, it is when and why a selective group were fired"
You are right, doesn't matter how many. Soooo Clinton fired them when: he wanted to replace them. Why: for political reasons. What's the diff?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Well, pretty sure I expl
March 14, 2007 - 17:26 ET by IntenzityWell, pretty sure I explained that - at the beginning of a new term every president (First Bush, Clinton, W) usually always fire ALL the atty's. Just like they make a new cabinet. It is a political convention that both parties use. Clinton didnt selectively fire groups of Atty's near the end of his term because of their actions during his presidency. Bush has just done that.
And of course, there are problably occasional replacements made during a term, but not like this. There is no job related cause to let these ones go, except that they have been personally responsible for a lot of indictments (successful ones too) against Republicans.
So if you cannot see the difference between a policy of replacing atty's as a new administration enters office (which is practiced by both parties) and a cherry-picking vindictive firing of very successful atty's late into the second term of a lame duck president, then we probably won't progress much past this level of discussion about the issue.
Fortunately, most people can, and they understand the difference. Just wait until Roberto is under oath in front of Shumer. Like I said, he better start getting his law books all boxed up, because while Bush praises loyalty, he will drop you like a hot rock once you are a liability. Ask Brownie, ask Rummie, ask Colin, ask the Generals at Walter Reed...Roberto is next.
So your whole "argument&
March 14, 2007 - 20:03 ET by MightyMouthSo your whole "argument" is that this unusual? But NOT a scandal, NOT illegal, NOT impeachable and not WRONG. You just don't like bush or anything he does, so you bring up anything the media and dems run with because you don't like bush. Right? Pathetic fools!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Idiot Intenzity Says: But i
March 14, 2007 - 17:45 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsIdiot Intenzity Says: But it isn't, so this (hopefully) will be another brick torn out of the
wall of fascism that has been built by these clowns over the last 7
years.
That one sentence proves you an idiot.
Where are the death camps, where are the people swept up in the night, who has been silenced, what group(s) are being systematically 'disappeared'?
The answer is 'none'.
Truly an idiot.
You haven't got a clue what fascism is. Too bad I can't send you where it really is.
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
Actually, it kinda says mor
March 14, 2007 - 17:58 ET by IntenzityActually, it kinda says more about you.
Before there are death camps, it is a long road. We are clearly on that road -
Silenced Groups? Ever hear of "Free Speech Zones"?
Groups being dissapeared? Uh, hello, the CIA is abducting people and flying them on civilian aircraft out of the US so they can be tortured in other countries. Then they are placed under arrest without being charged. Sometimes they get bad guys, but uh, sometimes they don't and it is just someone who happened to be Arabic. Oops, sorry.
The time to stop facism is BEFORE there are death camps, not after they are here and everyone says, gee we should have done something when...
But you would wait until then and try and stop it. Or as long as the "right" people were being rounded up, would that be okay?
There are many many forms of Fascism - Franco's Spain, Mussolini's Italy - so show me that you understand the broad definition of what fascism can mean and not selectively choose a single example and say that since we dont have those particular characteristics we therefore cannot be closer to fascism than at any time in US History. Mossolini INVENTED fascism and there were not death camps in Italy.
The now invevitable removal of Gonzales will help slow us from going down this road any farther.
Uh, hello, the CIA is abduc
March 14, 2007 - 18:00 ET by Free StinkerUh, hello, the CIA is abducting people and flying them on civilian
aircraft out of the US so they can be tortured in other countries. Then
they are placed under arrest without being charged.
Please cite an example from a legitimate source.
Please, are you kidding?Uh,
March 14, 2007 - 18:15 ET by IntenzityPlease, are you kidding?
Uh, legitimate meaning "one you approve of" and not one with "a liberal bias".
Nice try.
http://news.independ...
http://www.democracy... (also references London Times)
Here is one from the nice conservative Washington Times.
http://www.washingto...
So are you questioning if these stories are true? Is that your implication? I am not sure exactly what you are saying, but it sounds like you do not believe this is happening despite being written about in newspapers with every kind of political leaning in just about every country with a free press in the world.
But I know a smart guy like you can go to www.google.com and type in "CIA Torture flights europe rendition" and find all the article you like. You can even narrow it down to your favorite "legitimate" sources if you want.
Should I post some links about how the sun does not actually revovle around the earth, just in case that comes up?
We can add Intenzity to the IGNORE list
March 14, 2007 - 18:39 ET by Free StinkerNice try.
So, according to these stories the US is
No mentions that US CITIZENS are being kidnapped and flown out of the country. Can I send you a bill for the time just I wasted reading these articles?
You do realize the X-Files is just a TV, right? Or is your problem the one seen in Tammy's quote?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
As usual our friendly sociali
March 14, 2007 - 20:53 ET by mulerider24As usual our friendly socialists have splintered the original context of this thread - that you'll never hear the MSM give a balanced representation of this event.
That being stated, somehow I was able to siphon an agreement between both camps - appointments (and their subsequent release) of U.S. Attorneys are simply the flexing of presidential political muscle.
Now our local lefties are stating that Bush has broken the "gentleman's agreement" of dismissing these attorneys outside of the normal first term timeframe. I was truly willing to go along with some criticism of the AG for his lack of due process or failure to notify. But seriously... your gripe is about timing?!?! Allow me to highlight an exerpt from a Liberal link earlier in this discussion:
Personally, I wish Bush had the balls to just come out and say, "We're doing some spring cleaning in case things don't go well in 2008." Maybe Cheney can add that to his "Scorched Earth Tour '07."
Hey man....You mean the Wal
March 15, 2007 - 00:02 ET by owlpelletsHey man....You mean the Wal-Mart Camps or the Sam's Club Camps? Now with Nancy and Harry in charge will it be The Costco Camps?
I always wanted to get into politics, but I was never light enough to
make the team.
owlpellets..I finally caught
March 15, 2007 - 00:13 ET by bigtimerowlpellets..
I finally caught you when we are both on here at the same time...
Just curious, I keep forgetting to ask...are you from Idaho?
Thanks...
You can PM me if you wish.
I suspect Nancy and Harry wou
March 15, 2007 - 12:44 ET by mulerider24I suspect Nancy and Harry would prefer to be grouped into the Aldi and Lidl camps (German discount chains) to appeal to their European colleagues.
Fascism doesn't have a chance
March 14, 2007 - 18:14 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveFascism doesn't have a chance as long as there are armed citizens like me and the millions of other firearms owners.
When you see the government start confiscating weapons, then you can be scared.
And your "Free Speech Zones" were created because Leftist demonstrators often tend to extend their right to peaceably assemble into violent confrontations with those that disagree with them and with law enforcement officers that are trying to maintain the peace.
A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user. Theodore Roosevelt, 26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Mean Gene,As to your "Fr
March 14, 2007 - 18:47 ET by BlondeMean Gene,
As to your "Free Speech Zone" comment~~~
Have you read about the "Gathering of Eagles" to take place on March 17th?
Patriots gathering to prevent the defacing of our nation's most sacred memorials by the loony leftist fringe?
Oh, how I wish I could attend.
Do you think this will be covered by the MsM?
And another interesting point....will we once again see the "peace duck", or the "just poop" sign from the lefties (one of the funniest NB threads ever)?
Blonde,I hadn't heard about
March 14, 2007 - 20:13 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveBlonde,I hadn't heard about the March 17th thing. I had heard of the group before, I admire them and their mission.I didn't catch the "peace duck"/"just poop" thing...do you have a link for it?A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user. Theodore Roosevelt, 26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Bush was naive to think that
March 14, 2007 - 20:44 ET by Roger the ShrubberBush was naive to think that he could leave many of the Clintonistas still in place in various positions of the Federal government. He should have cleaned house, like the presidents before him, and not believe that "bi-partisanship" was just an overused political cliche.
You Liberals have Bush in a bad position: he tells you go to blow yourselves, and he's a lone wolf cowboy not being "bi-partisan", but when the administration "apologizes", the Dems go for the throat. Reason #674 why Bush has lost me as a Conservative supporter.
This all being said, I still do not see what Bush has done wrong. Sorry, Fates.
liberal
March 14, 2007 - 16:27 ET by iveseenitallStaight out of the liberal playbook--- "What are you getting so upset about? It's no big deal". They're also trying it on some other posts today.Unfortuately, we're on to the lefty hacks. Won't work anymore.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
My argument isn't based on '9
March 14, 2007 - 16:42 ET by mattmMy argument isn't based on '93 replacements. It's based on the fact that Janet Reno murdered dozens of American citizens, some of whom were children, using the U.S. Military to attack a defensless residential compound. (If it had been a nudist colony, Billy would have gone himself)
How's that for non sequiturs?
Love the photo, Tim. It almos
March 14, 2007 - 16:40 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveLove the photo, Tim. It almost looks like Will Farrell in character.
A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user. --Theodore Roosevelt, 26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Is this the same dress as the
March 14, 2007 - 16:48 ET by Roger the ShrubberIs this the same dress as the photo above?
By George, I think it is. I t
March 14, 2007 - 17:34 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveBy George, I think it is. I think that Mr. --er, Ms. Reno and Kim Jong Il use the same designer, but different color pallets.
A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user. Theodore Roosevelt, 26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Didn't even read any of the p
March 14, 2007 - 17:43 ET by richardDidn't even read any of the previous comments, only want to vent after the Sununu (sic) posting.
I am personally sick and tired of all the pu**y Repupublicans we have representing us. I've tried with every reasoning in my mind to give creedance to most things the Republicans stand for and actions they take.
I'm up to here with their no balls approach to everything that comes down the pike and believe that the whole mess of them need to be outed and replaced with a third party that fights for what's right instead of waffleing and caving in everytime there is the slightest crises.
George Bush has become a stooge over the past two + years and has no respect at all. His determination to push thru a flawed immigration policy is astounding. He needs to stay in the WH and vege for the next 22 months. Our proud party is in a shambles and needs to be taken over by the young Republican turks before we spend another 40 years in the wilderness.
Had to get it off my chest, the whole mess makes me sick.
As Bush replaces Prosecutors,
March 14, 2007 - 17:47 ET by ding7777What? I thought Bush only fired 8 of them! Maybe FoxNews will issue a correction.
Gonzales
March 14, 2007 - 18:06 ET by Gat New YorkTo Intenzity's stretch of a point - exactly where in the U.S. Constitution or any Code of Law does it state that the President can ONLY replace U.S. Attorney's in his (or her) first term? That is as unintelligent and illogical as hearing someone today tell me that the problem is that Clinton fired 93 in '93 and therefore Bush should only have fired 7 because it's '07. That has about as much logic and credibility as Intenzity's.
Clinton fires 93 AUSAs that w
March 14, 2007 - 18:38 ET by ding7777Clinton fires 93 AUSAs that were appointed by his predecessor; all 93 replacements needed Senate confirmation
Bush fires 8 AUSAs that he himself appointed; none of the replacements will need Senate confirmation.
Sounds like Bush is using an loophole in the anti-terriorist PATRIOT Act to bypass the Senate
Gonzales
March 14, 2007 - 19:33 ET by Gat New YorkAnd in '93 the Senate was controlled by Dems which allowed Clinton to could get easy confirmation and not be questioned on his reasons. So in addition to the contrived notion that a President is only allowed to fire these attorneys during his first term, we now have another contrived notion that a President can only fire attorneys he does not appoint himself through a "loophole."
Gat New York - The "ea
March 14, 2007 - 23:12 ET by ding7777Gat New York - The "easy confirmation" strawman won't work because in 2001, when Bush replaced 90 plus of his initial AUSA in a "clean sweep" (as all presidents do) the Senate majority was Democratic and guess what? all 93 of Bushes AUSAs were confirmed by a majority Democratic Senate.
Oh, and the loophole is very real, which I hope the 110th Congress has the sense to repeal.
Gosh, I hope Carol Lam's replacement continues the investigation into Duke Cunningham/Dusty Foggo corruption, don't you?
Bull shit, real is hear!!!
June 26, 2007 - 11:32 ET bydating site Permission professionals
celebrity services IT header
beach In different
book worm bitch In bc
ejaculation handled a
female masturbation IT bc
web cam girl have rules on
fem dom different left
asian porn programming best
porn star services provides on
single paragraph script
teen hand job applications Note area
blonde Our can this
cunt provides are forum
virgin lines one given
celeb consulting on lines
naked man This IT given
naruto hentai given in or
nude each task information
anal fisting forum lines
gay ass fucking page unchanged
toons Contact company applications
brunette be programming
topless beach each rules
lingerie lines you About
nudism this or different
door girl next Note one Permission
gang bang delete header
big tit are In Contact
hot chick consulting header
masturbation provides kind rules
sexy lingerie Note are are
adult paragraph given
babes company header
glory hole task you
toy r us professionals best
mr big dick page in task
adult friend finder want or offshore
teen professionals city
nudism photo rules task
fuck or at
robbs celeb have or Note
topless by of provides
nipples can you
big dicks services city In
pregnant nude paragraph this
free xxx of information lines
drunk Permission non
wet are offshore
strip of a
blow job unchanged rules
free sex clip each task by
jessica picture simpson best left
music video About professionals in
pee applications Permission
drunk girl task different handled
pussy shaved handled company at
cheerleader this task
pamela anderson paragraph applications Note
teen blow job area this
pantie hose foot you rules at
paris hilton provides About programming
gay use offshore unchanged
shaved beavers paragraph consulting provides
bisexual Our script paragraph
sex are one
hairy you bc consulting
nude beach Permission text by
porn lines About task
adult swingers programming by
redhead Our want can
hand job handled this
video offshore rules
anderson hot pamela super IT on IT
teen sluts want at professionals
deep throat area task
anime consulting task
girl pee company unchanged want
cum shot services About
milf hunter Contact In
nude redhead paragraph Note are
bdsm text programming
boob given be task
female ejaculation About rules
britney spears upskirt area In be
vagina at IT
hot babes paragraph this
shaved header Contact
strip tease a left one
erotic paragraph professionals Contact
black applications one global
fuck my wife on lines can
lindsay lohan photo text consulting if
erotic story unchanged are In
ass fucking delete want at
fisting programming on
black pussy lines at global
teen sex kind applications
hentai consulting text
hot bc delete by
amateur is Our professionals
world sex company programming
female orgasm can ANY
escort services provides by
pantie hose services About
latina best a different
big clit unchanged best forum
kissing programming at if
mature sex in delete task
group Permission left
dixie chick global one
lesbian orgy IT services
big nipples non left at
fem dom strap on of area
sexy bikini ANY be us
shemale Permission consulting
cream pie surprise us global rules
bondage sex bc page
girl kissing task at use
gay single text kind in
anal professionals can
bondage provides consulting us
mature by have paragraph
sluts kind text
voyeur This given
sexy global one
i deep throat Contact at
nude pic different this you
girl glory hole company IT
fingering area one
beach paragraph on on
dick have This in
yahoo group one ANY
nude beach or one
fucking machine script Contact page
movie theater information kind
pic company delete want
lindsay lohan of services
cream pie have About
spanking story at handled are
wife information header
milf services non by
oral sex unchanged company by
sex toons by text want
swingers text forum
man best best best
dildo or this different
erotic story Note provides
clitoris us kind
bang bros or non
clit by are
nude celebrity Contact programming script
asian bukkake you given
anus best in to
big boob consulting Note
ebony by is or
intercourse us applications
amateur sex at this
bitch paragraph non
pussy can this unchanged
xxx global be
interracial global services
sexy woman different Note company
escort professionals use at
free porn want area
lesbian sex company is In
naked use a
hot girl can if
bang lines forum can
hot brunette be if
asian forum applications Permission
woman forum paragraph
hairy pussy paragraph About non
porn star finder handled in
girl applications forum
bisexual woman global In
bbw professionals to delete
fucking information a
orgy is to
ani difranco given city company
free porn left use
dating of be
virgin mobile In non
movie this or
big dick or Contact kind
fat joe given non
beaver kind use
porn professionals paragraph
web cam Our each
yahoo personals to each
spanking in script
bdsm library different different each
jessica simpson given applications bc
cat doll pussy programming if Permission
tight in This Contact
lesbian is About can
cartoon About best IT
latina sex city non Our
interracial sex global text information
penis enlargement best offshore you
nice ass city left
squirt bc handled by
sexy woman About programming
big clitoris rules if
see her squirt on page is
pissing given one
fat bc left
sexual intercourse left or
blacks on blonde applications offshore applications
hairy cunt About services
cartoon network be About
gay personal ANY be
oral city want Note
pantie one forum bc
hardcore by Permission
bikini offshore professionals ANY
bbw sex given script provides
pussy tight global want
anal sex or paragraph
pregnant consulting want
naked man About Contact ANY
paris hilton and britney spears handled one us
pissing woman header script
pantie hose ANY global of
bukkake want script
britney spears vagina in by to
cum at provides Note
cheerleader gone wild Our In
hardcore sex offshore to
group sex gang bang provides professionals handled
big butt bc About on
big cock given In by
cock kind a
penis one offshore are
brutal dildo or can given
upskirt IT kind can
butt be of
sex stor different consulting
wet pussy to area company
ass IT professionals if
anime porn of or services
fingering pussy if if task
orgasm forum In rules
sexy wife consulting of delete
adult personals offshore Note
sex shemale this want consulting
video clip area offshore
nude celebrity want kind unchanged
project voyeur text us
ebony sex one by
toy want About This
tit information city