Unbelievably, disgraced newsreader, Dan Rather, claimed at a recent festival that American journalism "has in some ways lost its guts" and that the MSM has "adopted the go-along-to-get-along (attitude)."
As reported by CNETNews.com, Rather was a keynote speaker at the South by Southwest Interactive festival this past weekend where he gave a 2 hour talk on the shape of journalism and the Internet.
One has to wonder to which "gutless" American media he is referring? Is it the same media that was so weak-kneed as to leak damaging national security information, the same media that just "goes along" to undermine the war effort at every opportunity? Is it the same one that goes out of its way to malign the US and Israeli governments? It is that MSM Rather imagines has somehow gone soft?
Rather's talk was mostly about the media's purported gutlessness, but he did have a few words of interest to say about the new media on the Internet.
"The Internet is a tremendous tool for not just news, (because) its potential is unlimited for that," Rather said, but for "illumination and opening things up."
His dubious eloquence aside, Rather is right on with his assessment that the internet presents the great opportunities of this new century, but he also proves his tin ear on why the MSM has lost its luster with the general public.
One reason for that, Rather said, is that a sense has developed that questioning power, especially at a time of war, is perceived as unpatriotic or unsupportive of America's fighting troops.
"We've brought it on ourselves," he added, "partly because we've lost the sense that patriotic journalists will be on his or her feet asking the tough questions. My role as a member of the press is to be sometimes a check and balance on power."
"In many ways," said Rather to loud applause, "what we in journalism need is a spine transplant."
No, Mr. Rather, you have it wrong. No one is against the MSM for "questioning power". We distrust the MSM for its abuse of its own power to publish. We are distrustful of the MSM not for asking questions but for making things up out of whole cloth to push their own agenda.
We are distrustful of the MSM, Mr. Rather, because it lies.
Reutergate, fauxtography, not to mention the very reason Dan Rather lost his long time TV newsreader gig, Rathergate, has revealed that the MSM has an agenda to push, one that is not formulated to merely "question power", but one to bring down governments not to their liking. It is an agenda intended to shape policy instead of just report on it, and to place their favored candidates in power by manipulating polling, misreporting election results, and, via carefully picked topics upon which to report, guide the directions of campaigns.
Naturally, Rather is self-serving in his remarks because he imagines himself the pinnacle of "news". But, is he so blind to his own bias that he imagines himself balanced or moderate? Does he see himself, the man responsible for reporting fake stories... not just once, but several times... as the best man to be the government's "watchdog"?
Rather reiterated what he claims to view as the journalist's role.
"Not as an attack dog...But what does the lapdog do, he just crawls into someone's lap," he said. "A good watchdog barks at everything that's suspicious. I submit to you, the American press' role is to be a watchdog."
How Rather squares this claim, though, with his own "attack dog" history is anybody's guess?
No, what we see from Rather's talk at the SSI Festival is not the words of the sage of the news room, or the words of a man retiring with honor. What we see is a man desperately trying to soft peddle a career made of the very violations of truth and the role he claims the MSM should have. Rather is a man pretending to sage advice but a man who never lived up to his own high standards. And he is a man who lost his job because of it.
The final chapter of Dan Rather's career has already been written and it is a chapter that adds one of the last straws to break the trust that Americans once had in the media. Rathergate and so many like incidents is why we distrust the media. Not a supposed lack of "spine".
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The 'gutless' media is the me
March 13, 2007 - 06:41 ET by BillAdkinsThe 'gutless' media is the media that either intentionally or by acquiescence permitted itself to be used as a marketing tool for this administration to sell what is the worst strategic/military/foreign policy blunder in the nation's history. From Judith Miller to Bill Kristol to the Wall Street Journal to the New York Times. Rathergate in its effect as opposed to the actions of Miller et al is like comparing a common cold to cancer. The media betrayed America by permitting the clusterf--k in the White House to repeatedly lie about his pursuit of the war on terror as opposed to his vanity war in Iraq and then in its failure to hold him accountable once he was exposed as the worst president in history. This administration sold the Blunder in Iraq like Procter and Gamble might sell a new and improved laundry soap. I used to think Jimmy Carter was the worst president in history - then along came George W. Bush.
... speaking about tell a lie
March 13, 2007 - 06:50 ET by Warner Todd Huston... speaking about tell a lie long enough and you convince some people it's TRUE!!!
Billy boy, I think you wanted Democraticunderground.com, NOT Newsbusters.org!
"Courage" - That's what I want to say. Good night.
March 13, 2007 - 07:30 ET by SportPoliticsDan the pinhead overblown retard that can't do the math egominiac really means the media has lost the "COURAGE" since he got blown out the doors.
That's really all it is about. Everytime be bloviates the media is without courage,he reinforces his own self glorified stupid babbling sign off yapper phrase - that was banned - since he looked so damned foolish saying it at the safe dry CBS studio -
Remember when dumby bimby #2(couric) " asked 'the American people' (all 3 of her viewers) to help her come up with a sign off 'signature' " - since she had been thinking about it for so long and hadn't come up with anything...(BIMBO)
"Courage" - That's what I want to say. I'm glad I got myself disgraced and kicked off this job with a story I still stand by. I had no idea what was going on below me. Good night.
Stock tipBuy Alcoa, were go
March 13, 2007 - 07:48 ET by Right2thePointStock tip
Buy Alcoa, were gonna need a whole lot more tin foil.
R2TP... But- but- but- Alco
March 13, 2007 - 12:11 ET by Tim the EnchanterR2TP... But- but- but- Alcoa makes aluminum! (Aluminum Company of America) I know, I know- "tinfoil" is a lot easier to say than "aluminum foil". BTW: here's a secret tip for all of us Newsbusters- copper is a far better shielding metal than aluminum or tin, and it's a prettier color! Shhhhhh!
Lie?
March 13, 2007 - 23:09 ET by gfrrmanBA you just can't prove that "lie" thing pal!!! Don't be pissed cause your buddy BjC perjured himself and obstructed justice and had his law liscence revoked. You just can't get over that can ya. A liar is a liar and until you come up with the lie, which you can't(need the definition?) I think most educated people are tired of this same talking point. Give it a rest.
his tin ear on why the MSM ha
March 13, 2007 - 06:48 ET by Jack Bauerhis tin ear on why the MSM has lost its luster with the general public.
An excellent observation.
This is what happens when "journalists" turn from reportage to advocacy.
When so-called Journalism schools churn out people who think it's their job to "change" the world -- rather than to report on the world.
Is it any wonder that they have a tin ear. They're only listening to the incessant beat of their own tin drum.
JB
March 13, 2007 - 12:28 ET by cjkinseyHow do you distinguish between Advocacy and reporting? If he was saying something you liked, would he be reporting?
His talk was about the domination of a few corporate sources and their effect on the information provided.
If you are opposed to advocacy, then are you going to denounce Fauxnews?
Life's too short to waste t
March 13, 2007 - 12:33 ET by Jack BauerLife's too short to waste time with someone who doesn't know the difference between advocacy and reporting.
You should go to what passes for "Journalism" school. You'd fit right in.
"Fauxnews"! How clever!
March 13, 2007 - 12:39 ET by RJ"Fauxnews"! How clever, cj!
Not that facts matter to you folks in the A.N.S.W.E.R. crowd, but Fox has more 'liberal" news anchors and commentators than the number of "conservatives" in all the other broadcast and cable operations combined.
Uh -- "My role as a memb
March 13, 2007 - 07:03 ET by Evil KlownUh -- "My role as a member of the press is to sometimes be a check and balance on power." ???
I thought that was what the three branches of government were for.
Pure, unadulterated arrogance.
He thinks the press is supposed to bark at anything that's suspicious??
Suspicious to whom? They certainly don't make a peep about things I consider suspicious.
So, would anyone here put i
March 13, 2007 - 07:07 ET by sarcasmoSo, would anyone here put it past an entity with "an agenda intended to shape policy instead of just report on it, and to place their favored candidates in power by manipulating polling, misreporting election results, and, via carefully picked topics upon which to report, guide the directions of campaigns" to try to manipulate the primaries of a certain political party? Say by relentlessly-pushing Northeastern RINOs and a drug-overdosed ex-stripper over-&-over, to the exclusion of lesser known candidates the TV media refuse to even admit are running?? In this sense, and in this sense only, what Rather implies about the ability of the 'net to go-around the bias of TV is correct, but believe me...Dan has consistently been the cause of antilibertarian media-bias, not the solution, for a long time.
JMR
The CAUSE, for sure!
March 13, 2007 - 07:13 ET by Warner Todd HustonThe CAUSE, for sure!
What I love about the 'net,
March 13, 2007 - 07:25 ET by sarcasmoWhat I love about the 'net, and something tells me it's what Dan probably-hates, is that now, in my own small way, I can take journalists like Dan on when they tell their favorite lies, like calling decreases-in-budget-increases "cuts." I've offered, without success, to take-on Bill O'Reilly in debate on various issues, but Bill's only got a TV show with limited time. Dan Rather is said to have an entire webcast at his disposal, so taking on internet-pipsqueaks like me should be no-problem, but somehow I doubt I'll hear from him...
JMR
Rather's pathetic attempt to maintain relevance.
March 13, 2007 - 07:33 ET by acaiguanaRather's pathetic attempt to maintain relevance.
It is pretty clear to me that he is struggling just to be heard at all. Nobody is asking him for op-eds, nobody is putting him in as a 'commentator' on their shows and nobody is listening to him.
I wonder if he realizes that a very large number of people see his face and turn aside.
The man will never back down because he has nowhere left to go. His hole is so deep he just wallows in his imagined victim status but 'puts on the face.'
Really, applause or not, I would like to have been there to hear what his audience really thought of him. He is one of the prime reasons why the final underpinnings fell of any loyalty or belief in the broadcast media alphabet network news has credibiity. He hurt a lot of people in that room.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
"American journalism &qu
March 13, 2007 - 07:51 ET by knights68"American journalism "has in some ways lost its guts" and that the MSM has "adopted the go-along-to-get-along (attitude)."
So what's the big secret here? And considering the source, of all people, would he not know best that the MSM has lost it's guts and have for some time now?
Lost Its Guts
March 13, 2007 - 07:52 ET by PawpawNWrong wordage. Not "LOST ITS GUTS" but "JUST KEEPS GETTING CAUGHT". Nothing makes you lie more than getting caught. You just keep repeating the lie hoping that everyone will finally believe you. It used to work for these spoiled people, and it was our fault they got that way. All network news people are nowadays is a ratings game, who gets the highest numbers gets the most monies for their commericals. Goota go, want to get my Katie mandated Health Care coverage!
Here we have a cult figure
March 13, 2007 - 08:02 ET by Right2thePointHere we have a cult figure beyond his prime.
He fails to accept it in a shear denial of position.
Reality will never set in with him. He will go to his grave with this same position.
A true mark of a "newsman" who thinks he considers all issues and fairly reports all aspects of reality.
A sad display of a person who really was in a position at one time to have had a real effect but chose to waste it and cheapen it in so many ways.
Even worse are the now replacements who must be in total denial if they watch their own reruns when they get home.
Agreed, WTH.
March 13, 2007 - 08:06 ET by sanskritgAgreed, WTH.
Dan, I'd Rather not
March 13, 2007 - 08:29 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsWell, let's see, "disgraced newsreader, Dan Rather" (love that!), was certainly right when he said:
"The Internet is a tremendous tool for not just news, (because) its
potential is unlimited for that," Rather said, but for "illumination
and opening things up."
He saw that first hand when his feeble attempt at swaying a Presidential election using forged documents was 'illuminated' and 'opened up' by various bloggers.
And he still doesn't get it.
D
A day without NewsBusters is like a day without sunshine.
I was just going to point tha
March 13, 2007 - 09:25 ET by old croI was just going to point that quote out but you beat me to it. Thanks to the people at "
Free Republic> (Buckhead, Howlin, Jim Robinson) "
LGFCharles Johnson
and "! Powerline John Hinderaker, Scott Johnson and Paul Mirengoff
. I think Dan kind of "lost his breakfast and guts" when that went down.
Sorry about that last posting
March 13, 2007 - 09:30 ET by old croSorry about that last posting, my html skills are just not up to snuff!
"I went to a restaurant that serves "breakfast at any time". So I ordered French Toast during the Renaissance."
- Steven Wright
guts, what guts? it lost it
March 13, 2007 - 09:20 ET by buddycguts, what guts? it lost its ethics.
So, first its integrity, then
March 13, 2007 - 11:28 ET by MikeBSo, first its integrity, then its credibility, and now "journalism" has lost its "guts"? Damn, Danny! You and your buddies are in a world of hurt, aren't you?
Somehow, I don't think you are complaining about your marxist buddies in the Department of Propaganda not reporting on Harry Reid's shady land deals, or Gerry Studds' homosexual preying on Congressional pages, or William Jefferson's videotaped bribery, or the lies and fabrications of Hillary and AlGore.
Go peddle your "fake but accurate" fertilizer elsewhere, Danny, 'cause we aren't in the market.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Sorry, Dan... can't lose wh
March 13, 2007 - 11:54 ET by Tim the EnchanterSorry, Dan... can't lose what you never had. When push came to shove, you guys bailed every time.
Rather
March 13, 2007 - 12:15 ET by pocomocoDan Rather: Journalism Has 'Lost its Guts'
That’s right. What the MSM need is more fauxmemos, fauxnews, fauxtography, fauxreporters, and……….what’s that you say, the MSM already do that?
Never mind!
"A good watchdog barks
March 13, 2007 - 13:20 ET by Dave in Texas"A good watchdog barks at everything that's suspicious."
Okay Dan, prove it. I'm sure that Marc Cuban has ruffled a few feathers in his lifetime and I'm sure you could find plenty of people who'd love to share some stories with you that probably don't cast him in a very favorable light. So are you going to go investigate that suspicious stuff, or just be a good lapdog?
You want to talk about watchdogs? The folks at NB are watchdogs!
March 13, 2007 - 22:27 ET by zeoconSo basically he's saying the MSM isn't biased enough. Unbelievable.
-----