Bozell: American People Believe Media's A Major Factor In Our Moral Decline

Photo of Tim Graham.

Brent Bozell's culture column this week unfolds the new polling numbers for the MRC's Culture and Media Institute on the American people's impression of moral decline and the media's role in it:

A new cultural-values survey of 2,000 American adults performed by the polling firm of Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates for the Culture and Media Institute reveals a strong majority, 74 percent, believes moral values in America are weaker than they were 20 years ago. Almost half, 48 percent, agree that values are much weaker than they were 20 years ago.

Why the pessimism? Is the answer right in front of them, in their own children, or their children’s friends? Or is the answer more indirect, gleaned from staring at the popular culture? For most, a major leading indicator of moral decline is the media. Clearly, Americans look into their television sets, and are getting a high-definition dose of Hollywood’s take on values. Fully 68 percent of Americans in the survey said the media are having a detrimental effect on moral values in America.

Americans place heavier blame on the entertainment media, but they blame the news media as well, with its emphasis on sex, violence, and ditzy head-shaving celebrities. Why do even supposedly serious news outlets devote hours of air time to airheads like Paris Hilton, whose ticket to fame was her old-wealth surname and her talent on “private” sex tapes?

The agreement is remarkable across political and religious subsets. Not only do 73 percent believe the entertainment media has a negative effect on America’s commitment to moral values, that’s a sentiment shared by Republicans (86 percent) and Democrats (68 percent); conservatives (80 percent) and liberals (64 percent), even religious types identified as orthodox (82 percent) and mostly secular progressives (62 percent).

Brent notes that most people put parents first on the line for keeping children on a stronger moral path:

The media are a major influence on shaping our cultural values, and America knows it. Almost two-thirds of the people surveyed (64 percent) agree the media are an important factor in the culture. It sometimes seems almost impossibly pervasive and immune to complaints as they cross every new frontier of excess.

But they’re reasonable in knowing that the media is ultimately not the most important factor. Good parents can be a much more direct moral influence than the TV or the multiplex or the radio. Of those who are asked who is most responsible for moral decline among young people, 57 percent of the people surveyed blamed parents and families first, and only 21 percent blame the media first. Parents need to be a gatekeeper to children’s entertainment, to guide them through its treacherous passages, and not merely let them hitch-hike along the road alone.

There's other numbers here that are interesting, too. Sadly, this cultural survey shows that while Americans have a great consensus on the importance of classic virtues like truthfulness, thrift, industry, and charity, they often fail to follow through. America is becoming more situational in its everyday ethics.

When asked if they would take a job for cash and still collect unemployment benefits, 33 percent said yes. When asked if they would correct a waiter’s error when items ended up missing from the check, 25 percent would pay the smaller tab. When asked if it’s always wrong to break the law, 26 percent agreed that some laws were okay to break, if no one gets hurt.

But at this crossroads, the differences in religious belief cause a difference in responses. The pollsters identified three types. The orthodox are religiously observant people who believe in living by God’s teachings. The progressives advocate a secularized approach to private and public life and support living by their own principles. In between are the independents, who endorse neither religiously guided public morality nor secular ideology.

The progressives are much more situational in their choices. Only 21 percent of the orthodox group said they would cheat on unemployment benefits, while 49 percent in the progressive group said they would. Only 11 percent of the orthodox would cheat the restaurant on the waiter’s error, while 45 percent of progressives would. Eighty-two percent of the orthodox say it’s wrong to break the law, even if they disagree with it, but only 42 percent of progressives agree.

These results raise the classic question about whether belief in God is needed for morality. Clearly, a human being can lead an exceedingly moral life without any religious belief. But it also seems clear, in very general terms, that people who live their lives believing they will be judged by a mighty yet merciful God have a different kind of discipline than people who believe that they live to serve themselves, or a God that offers only comfort and not judgment.

—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well Tim, I'll take a shot

Well Tim, I'll take a shot at this. Morals are what we were taught when we grew up. Many followed our parents directions and that of the church we went to.

The tricky part was going into young adulthood and being influenced by friends. Once I reached college I broke free from my parents (in some respects) and then with freedom came a sense of liberation to do things like smoke pot.

I think the entertainment media acted as a justification of my actions (as in Cheech And Chong for instance) and then I found myself less guilty about it.

Many film and TV producers like to claim that they are just simply mirroring society. That's only half true. The other half is they endorse certain immoral behavior just by portraying it in a positive or matter-of-fact way.

So the first amendment does not take into account any kind of morality. BTW I don't "inhale" any more. That stopped many years ago.

I also think more should be made regarding the influence of people in their late teens and early 20's. Too much is emphasis on young children. It always sounds like blanket statement which seems to carry no weight.

But sex and violence on TV

But sex and violence on TV and in movies don't affect people!!!!! (unless it's Wile E. Coyote falling off a cliff in his attempt to catch the roadrunner -- or American soldiers learning torture techniques from watching '24')

Oh, by the way, did anyone here know Anna Nicole Smith died?

Lee T.

U.S. Navy (ret.) / Hillsboro, Oregon

I have enough money to last me the rest of my life. Unless I buy something.

What I'd find amusing, but

What I'd find amusing, but we'll never-see-it here, is a graph of what the FCC has cost US taxpayers over the last 20 years. But I suspect my FCC-graph wouldn't fit too-well with some agendas around-here...
JMR

People are wising up

I know for a fact the way the press shows sex and relationships effect young people. I have seen it happen - as enough people apparently now have seen as well. There is something about bringing the edgy barely graphic and the implied sexual relationships up to that edge, that very brink of showing nudity and naked penetration. SOME young teens just don't deal with it well, especially ADHD boys and Bipolar girls - and these kids see this garbage as an implied OK to screw like naked apes, in the bushes, wherever. We are talking about 13 and 14 year old girls and 16-17 yo boys who have watched this trash since under 10.

13 and 14 year olds? There

13 and 14 year olds? There was just a story on the Drudge Report about a couple of sixth graders having sex in a classroom with a teacher present (the other kids acted as lookouts).

What on earth are we doing to our children? I would not want to be raising pre-teens or teens for any amount of money right now.

No question in my mind--

No question in my mind--the trash that is on TV makes every effort to create the impression that "this is how life really is". I remember---way back--in Mass. -- an engineer fixed his TV set so the his kids could get only two channels and they were educational channels. Today, God knows what you will find even on those channels. They steal the child from childhood. Witness news of oral sex on a school bus in MA, with two 14 year olds involved and many other incidents. Columbine, IMHO, was straight from TV.

An ugly American is one who does not support his country.

I think if people believe the

I think if people believe the media is responsible for moral decline, then the American public either doesn't care or isn't concerned. If people believe this is true, then parents will have to work that much harder (which doesn't mean hovering).

And Fabrizio McLaughlin and Associates came up with poll results that coincide with conservative views? SHOCKING.

I think we have every right

I think we have every right to expect a certain level of morality on television.

Now, having said that...

The only person responsible for ensuring my child is raised morally, is ME. If you are willing to blame the media or anything other then parents for the lack of morality in today's youth, you are simply part of the problem.

The real problem is the fact that television is used as a babysitter by far too many parents. Guess what, if you don't like what is on TV, don't watch it. Better yet, do what I do and don't even subscribe to cable television. This site proves daily that there is very little worth watching anyway.

"And Fabrizio McLaughl

"And Fabrizio McLaughlin and Associates came up with poll results that coincide with conservative views? SHOCKING."

Occasionally, and this might be said to be one of those times, Balboa really lands a good one. :) (Of course, the same could be said of various leftwing polling-firms every time the left tries to take their results too-seriously!)
JMR