Of the broadcast network evening news shows, on Friday the NBC Nightly News uniquely covered the "history-making" federal court ruling striking down Washington, D.C.'s restrictive gun control laws. While anchor Brian Williams made the story his show's lead item, with correspondent Pete Williams calling it "the most important gun control ruling in 70 years," the CBS Evening News and ABC's World News ignored the story entirely.
Pete Williams set up his report relaying the story of D.C. resident Tom Palmer, "who was once assaulted and wants a gun in the house for self-defense." A party to the lawsuit against D.C., Palmer argued that since "criminals don't obey the law," that "it's the law-abiding citizens who are disarmed by this law." The report then featured opposing viewpoints in the form of soundbites from Democratic Mayor Adrian Fenty and gun control advocate Paul Helmke complaining that the ruling could "weaken gun laws nationwide." (Transcript follows)
Notably, according to a January 2000 study by the MRC's Geoffrey Dickens on media coverage of gun issues, while all three major broadcast networks were found to be substantially biased in favor of gun control, NBC was relatively least biased compared to ABC and CBS.
Below is a complete transcript of the story that appeared on the Friday March 9 NBC Nightly News:
Brian Williams, in opening teaser: "The right to bear arms: Tonight, a major court decision on gun control that is sure to stir up passions on both sides of the gun fight."
...Brian Williams: "Good evening. As long as there have been firearms and for as long as there's been a Constitution of the United States, there's been a debate in this country over the definition of the right to bear arms. Today in Washington, a federal court struck down the law that bans guns in the nation's capital. It is one of the strictest gun control laws in the country. And when this case is all over, that right to bear arms just might have a whole new definition. We begin here tonight with this history-making case involving an emotional topic. Pete Williams starts us off in our Washington bureau this Friday night. Pete, good evening."
Pete Williams: "Brian, good evening. This is the most important gun control ruling in 70 years because for the first time a federal appeals court has used the Second Amendment to strike a gun law down. Today's ruling is a victory for Tom Palmer, a Washington, D.C. resident who was once assaulted and wants a gun in the house for self-defense."
Tom Palmer: "The fact is that the criminals don't obey the law, and they do have guns. It's the law-abiding citizens who are disarmed by this law."
Pete Williams: "He was one of six who went to court to challenge the city's strict gun law, passed as an anti-crime measure 30 years ago. It outlaws handguns or rifles, except for residents with permits, mainly police or security guards. But today, by a 2-to-1 vote, a panel of the federal appeals court here said the law violates the constitutional right to bear arms. Washington's mayor says the ruling could put more guns in the hands of young people."
Mayor Adrian Fenty (D-Washington, DC): "I am personally deeply disappointed and quite frankly outraged by today's decision. Today's decision flies in the face of laws that have helped decrease gun violence in the District of Columbia."
Williams: "The ruling revives a long fight over the 27 words of the Second Amendment. Gun control advocates argue that the phrase 'well-regulated militia' means owning a gun is a group right subject to restriction. But the court today said the right to bear arms is an individual right for private activities, including self-defense."
Charlton Heston, holding up a rifle at a past NRA convention: "From my cold, dead hands!"
Pete Williams: "That's precisely the view the National Rifle Association has advocated for decades. Legal experts say today's ruling launches a huge battle."
Tom Goldstein, Legal Expert: "This is a monumental case that sets up the biggest fight over gun rights in the modern history of the United States."
Pete Williams: "New York and Chicago have similar strict gun laws, and a host of local and federal laws regulate gun ownership. Gun control groups fear if today's ruling stands, it could weaken gun laws nationwide."
Paul Helmke, Gun Control Advocate: "You're allowing any sort of a gun law, whether it's a waiting period, a background check, you leave it open to challenge."
Pete Williams: "The city says it will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, Brian."
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




Pete Williams: "Brian, good evening. This is the most important gun control ruling in 70 years because for the first time a federal appeals court has used the Second Amendment to strike a gun law down. Today's ruling is a victory for Tom Palmer, a Washington, D.C. resident who was once assaulted and wants a gun in the house for self-defense."














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
As I pointed out yesterday, a
March 10, 2007 - 20:39 ET by ThisnThatAs I pointed out yesterday, at 11:00pm I still hadn't seen anything on CNN.com about this, and I thought that to be very curious at the time. A CNN.com writeup showed up this morning, though.
It's another case where the MSM shows its bias by omitting coverage of important events with outcomes that they don't like.
Just one eau de cologne minut
March 10, 2007 - 20:45 ET by MikeBJust one eau de cologne minute here, Mayor Fenty. Your unconstitutional anti-gun laws reduced gun violence in D.C.? Since when? D.C. has one of the highest murder rates in the country. Now that law abiding citizens are now allowed to be armed, you can count on a decrease in violent crime in your city. Of course, the really stupid criminals will try to continue, but they will shortly be eliminated. And, that, I think is your problem with this decision: the Democrat Party in D.C. is going to be thinned out some. But, don't worry Mayor, as I understand it, you Democrats still allow dead people to vote, so you shouldn't really lose too many Democrat voters.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Ooh, Bang! Very funny, Mike
March 10, 2007 - 23:22 ET by bulletproofOoh, Bang! Very funny, MikeB. I know Ex-Mayor Barry is counting his blessings right now; ahh, the criminal demographic!
Never use your gun to pistol-wip a Liberal. That could mar the finish.
"Gun violence" di
March 11, 2007 - 11:09 ET by Carbon Sasquatch"Gun violence" did drop in WaDC, just way less of a decrease than in surrounding (armed) cities.
What's going on at NBC (Not B
March 10, 2007 - 21:04 ET by FastEdWhat's going on at NBC (Not Bush's Cronnies) ? First winning in Iraq, now reporting anti-gun control? There's something going on here. Me thinks that the Not Brainy Correspondents are doing their "See we're not biased" best to prepare for a blind-side report later. 'Tis all a smoke screen for somthing later on. Major proof will be if they report that Libby was really innocent, and the Fritzburger was on a fishing expedition and the Nay Boobs Counter-reporters predict he gets let off during appeal.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
FastEd...I keep hoping it's t
March 10, 2007 - 21:07 ET by Clear thinkerFastEd...
I keep hoping it's the market forcing them to rethink how they present the news.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Dream on, Clear.They are so w
March 10, 2007 - 21:10 ET by BlondeDream on, Clear.
They are so wrapped up in their liberal little paridigm....they'll never change.
Until they're all unemployed, that is.
And I, for one, shall be laughing.
Blonde...I did use the word '
March 10, 2007 - 21:18 ET by Clear thinkerBlonde...
I did use the word 'hoping', so I'm not completely naive, just a little.
And I will be laughing along with you!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
CT,Quite so.And I'll be laugh
March 10, 2007 - 21:25 ET by BlondeCT,
Quite so.
And I'll be laughing the most at "Brian the Idiot"....you remember, we clearly and "agressively" misunderstood him.
I wish I'd encounter him in the salon while getting my nails done (while he was getting his toes done)....what a maroon!
You rarely here about an upst
March 10, 2007 - 21:33 ET by mostlymoderateYou rarely here about an upstanding, average-joe killing somebody with his legally registered firearm. What the hell do these mayor's think they are going to accomplish with their anti-gun laws? It's like banning pharmaceuticals because there is a crack problem.
P.S. Charleton Heston Kicks A
March 10, 2007 - 21:38 ET by mostlymoderateP.S. Charleton Heston rules
"[L]egally registered firearm
March 11, 2007 - 10:51 ET by ArmedDad"[L]egally registered firearm...".As the right to keep and bear arms is endowed to us by our Creator,government permission should never be required to exercise that right.
"The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for,among old parchments,or musty records.They are written as with a sunbeam in the whole volume of human nature,by the hand of the divinity itself;and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power."
Alexander Hamilton,1775
So true, AD.One of my favor
March 11, 2007 - 14:30 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveSo true, AD.
One of my favorite sites is all about the importance of exercising our right to keep and bear arms, See the Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog. It is updated every day.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Has anyone seen the editorial
March 10, 2007 - 21:52 ET by Tony SHas anyone seen the editorial in the Wash. Post about this ruling? It's titled "Dangerous Ruling." Their points are so cliche and predictable, this reads like a satire of a liberal editorial. (Link posted below; I hope this site allows links.)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030901794.html
Do you notice how the WP edit
March 10, 2007 - 22:11 ET by hatukDid you notice how the WP editorial tagged the two judges that voted against the DC law as "conservatives?" Also, had the framers of the Bill of Rights meant the 2nd to mean "states rights" they would have used the word "state" not "people" in the second part of the ammendment. But libs read what they want, when they want, how they want! This gun issue has nothing to do with public safety, it's about them (anti-gunners) telling everyone else how to live their lives. If guns go then it will be the same people telling us we can't have something else! Red cars, motorcycles, brick houses, whatever 'they' don't like.
I too would like to thank lib
March 10, 2007 - 22:18 ET by Clear thinkerI too would like to thank liberals for telling me what to think.
Would someone kindly tell these people they are NOT in charge of you or me!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Here, here! Trouble is they
March 10, 2007 - 22:24 ET by hatukHere, here! Trouble is they don't read it like you and I! What scares me most on the gun control issue (and I work in the industry) is if they can actually do what they want, out-law them, without a constitutional ammendment overturning the 2nd, then they can pretty well do anything they want after that regarding any other part of the Constitution. Just find a liberal judge that thinks their way and bang (no pun intended) there goes another "right" they don't like!
I have to go through my day b
March 10, 2007 - 22:30 ET by Clear thinkerI have to go through my day beleiving they can't overturn the 2nd.
Besides my letters, I send a donation to the NRA every year like clockwork and hope they can stave off any attacks by the commie libs.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Ct...We are proud members of
March 10, 2007 - 23:34 ET by bigtimerCt...
We are proud members of the NRA always will be.
Thank goodness for all of us that contribute and keep our rights to bear arms...nobody will take that away...nobody.
bigtimer..I have been a membe
March 11, 2007 - 01:05 ET by ww thumperbigtimer..I have been a member of the NRA for a very long time. Someone once said "when guns are outlawd, only outlaws will have guns!" That is the way it is in Cook county IL. wher they have more gun crime than any where else in IL! I live in King Co WA and must be very careful about handling guns here. I have always supported gun rights for good people. Any one who commits a crime with a gun should spend SERIOUS prison time! and a rule that they must never have a gun ever again! ww
ww I was a member-
March 11, 2007 - 01:14 ET by misterbillww I was a member- and I never owned a gun. I always thought it was the right of every LAW-ABIDING American to own a gun. I still do. It's just that since going on retirement money, I use the dues to buy me a bottle of Jack each year instead.
An ugly American is one who does not support his country.
misterbill...Good evening sir
March 11, 2007 - 01:27 ET by ww thumpermisterbill...Good evening sir! It IS the right for every law abiding American to own a handgun , except in certain citys. It is too bad the NRA cant get laws passed to give EVERY American that right.
NRA
March 11, 2007 - 01:43 ET by misterbillWell ww I know the NRA is trying. There is some risk, but I feel even if the risk is realized , the lawlessness will be significantly reduced. I do not fear a God-fearing man whether he is armed or not. There is nothing to fear.
What I do fear is that one day in the not too distant future that all God-fearing men and women will have to carry arms for their own protection. It seems , more and more the law protects the lawbreakers and not the victims.
An ugly American is one who does not support his country.
I'm a proud Life Member of th
March 11, 2007 - 03:30 ET by wwsmithI'm a proud Life Member of the NRA and support them in any way possible. Here in the Sunshine state the crime rate has been dropping since we passed our concealed carry laws. Those laws were also recently strengthened allowing us to stand our ground and defend ourselves from the criminal element. Contrary to the anti-gunners wishes it did not turn this state into the Wild West but it has thinned the criminals out a bit more.
"Red cars, motorcycles,
March 11, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Carbon Sasquatch"Red cars, motorcycles, brick houses..." Those are way down the list, but banners have to keep busy--liquor, tobacco, transfats.
Pete Williams: "The cit
March 10, 2007 - 22:31 ET by bigtimerPete Williams: "The city says it will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary, Brian."
Go ahead...make my day!
Thank God for the NRA and the CATO institute for filing this in '03....
Gotta love it!
By the way, I guess if CBS/ABC didn't file and report on this story it didn't happen...didn't happen...didn't happen!
LMAO!
gun laws
March 11, 2007 - 07:01 ET by DontabFrom my dead cold hands
My first comment on this grea
March 11, 2007 - 09:00 ET by GeorgeTMy first comment on this great site.
Anyway, on to this particular news piece. This ruling in support of armed citizens is indeed a "history-making" event.
From my understanding, the Second Amendment has not been applied like this before. It seems like this is one step towards the Second Amendment being applied to all citizens. This has happened with the First Amendment, but to my knowledge, not with the Second Amendment.
I don't know if anyone else noticed a quote that could have a large impact on the right to bear arms: "But the court today said the right to bear arms is an individual right for private activities, including self-defense."
That's called applying the Second Amendment to individuals and not just a "well-regulated militia". It's one further step towards individual rights and the right to self-defense (which is itself sometimes in question).
Just my thoughts on the matter. Now if this ruling would only apply to all States and citizens.