As a devout conservative, I must say that I was shocked – shocked I tell you, shocked! – to find out that I don’t like sex. Alas, if Chris Matthews says so, who am I to question it, right?
With that in mind, I think all readers need to brace themselves for the truth according to the all-knowing, all-seeing, wisest man in the world as presented on Friday's "Hardball."
We must learn from the sage, ladies and gentlemen, as he explains why liberals are focused on important issues like “poverty, injustice, and racism, and nuclear war,” while “conservatives don’t like sex” (video available here courtesy of our friend Ms Underestimated):
The liberals will talk about poverty, injustice, and racism, and nuclear war, and pick that part of the Christian message from Jesus, and the conservatives will find the evils of sodomy, the evils of, uh, uh, infidelity, the evils of sex of any form. It seems like the conservatives don’t like sex and they’re very focused on that and the liberals are focused on social injustice.
Yikes. I guess I better tell my wife and kids before it’s too late, huh?
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Chris Matthews is a waste of
March 9, 2007 - 22:36 ET by mostlymoderateChris Matthews is a waste of air. I tried to listen to one of his shows last night but unfortunately he TALKS OVER his guests. What a jerk. As for conservatives not liking sex, that doesn't even deserve a comment.
Mathews: that's silly. You'
March 10, 2007 - 05:55 ET by Andrew H.Mathews: that's silly. You're not worth a single viewing--nothing more than a silly lib repeating a silly stereotype. Can't be original if you're stuck with nothing but the silly talking points of a silly political movement toward poverty.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Typical adolescent liberal th
March 9, 2007 - 22:39 ET by Scout FinchTypical adolescent liberal thinking. Conservatives prefer deep, soulfull sexual bonding with someone they're committed to, while liberals would rather ogle magazines and titilating movies. Yes, I'm generalizing. But what would you call what Chris is doing?
What's your evidence, Chris?
March 9, 2007 - 22:39 ET by nkviking75Do you suppose this comment is based on the number of conservative women who've turned Chris down?
Nah. He probably doesn't know any conservative women.
Very good response! I like i
March 9, 2007 - 22:43 ET by mostlymoderateGood Response! I like it
Matthews may want to check
March 10, 2007 - 06:02 ET by motherbeltMatthews may want to check with Bill Maher on that one. According to him, conservatives are gay, at least when it comes to Ronald Reagan.
The way Mathhews seethes,sa
March 9, 2007 - 22:50 ET by BlazerThe way Mathhews seethes,salivates, and rains a torrential downpour of spittle on each , and everyone of his guests, you can definately tell who's 'not' getting any.
Being directly in front of him, you wouldn't get wetter if you were sitting in the front row at Seaworld watching Shamu.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
Chris' Spittle
March 10, 2007 - 00:55 ET by Amanda JusticeOMG, Blazer.. I thought I was the only one who noticed Matthews' spittle that he spews every time he talks. You said EXACTLY what I've always thought about that. Good line about Shamu, too.. HAHAHA... Oh, and besides Shamu, people who don't know they'll get that with Chris Matthews interview are the same ones who don't think they'll get wet on the water log ride at Six Flags.
You weren't imaging things
March 10, 2007 - 01:10 ET by BlazerYou weren't imaging things A.J.. Michelle Malkin posted on her site awhile back, recollecting an interview she did on Hardball where she was practically rained on with spittle, and taken aback by his seethiness.
I believe it was on this very site not too long ago, that a video clip was posted ,where you could see an actual rope of saliva come out of the corner of Matthews mouth, and connect in an unbroken line to his desk, while talking about the Scooter Libby trial.
This guy is very creepy. He reminds me of some drooling, ravenous vampire, with a salaciousness for human flesh.
, "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
Chris Mathews is a total idio
March 9, 2007 - 22:54 ET by ThisnThatChris Mathews is a total idiot. I'm glad someone else watches his program so I don't have to. Maybe that'll change sometime in the far future if he ever has a day with a single coherent thought.
And his comment about social injustice? Liberals are the type of people who try to cram it down your throat until you, too, are focused on social injustice -- and wear it on your sleeve.
This proves it...Matthews is
March 9, 2007 - 23:01 ET by bigtimerThis proves it...Matthews is definitely certifiable.
Well, they like it, as long a
March 9, 2007 - 23:08 ET by balboaWell, they like it, as long as it's conducted the way they say it should be.
:-)
I remember Coulter saying on some show that liberals only having empty, meaningless sex. That's no more true than what Matthews said here. These right and left labels just don't work very well.
With maple syrup and feathers
March 10, 2007 - 10:21 ET by Roger the ShrubberWith maple syrup and feathers?
If so, count me in!
We all know why he made that
March 9, 2007 - 23:12 ET by ZoneDaiatlasWe all know why he made that comment about Conseratives. His Wife is a Conserative Republican and she doesn't like having sex with Chris Matthew...
Are you kidding?, ofcourse we
March 9, 2007 - 23:20 ET by The FugitiveAre you kidding?, ofcourse we conservatives LOVE sex, unlike Matthews we just happen to love having it with women and very often.
Why is it that EVERYTIME a liberal opens their mouth, I feel a sudden urge to hand them a roll of toilet paper?
TF...LMAO!Bet Matthews doesn'
March 9, 2007 - 23:26 ET by bigtimerTF...
LMAO!
Bet Matthews doesn't get much...if any at all....may be his problem, or one of them anyway.
I feel sorry for Mrs. Matthew
March 9, 2007 - 23:28 ET by ZoneDaiatlasI feel sorry for Mrs. Matthews! Have to wake up every morning and the first thing you see is Chris Matthew...
Sorry Chris, your hand does
March 9, 2007 - 23:31 ET by wiwfSorry Chris, your hand does not count as sex, you liberal moron. So yes, you are still a virgin.
"The liberals will tal
March 9, 2007 - 23:36 ET by wiwf"The liberals will talk about poverty, injustice, and racism, and nuclear war"
Yes, how better to deal with poverty by raising the minimum wage and enforcing socialist principles on the hard working people in our country!
How better to deal with injustice by claiming that conservatives are inherently evil and don't like sex!
How better to deal with racism by using Affirmative Action, brilliantly fighting dscrimination with discrimination!
How better to deal with nuclear war than to let Iran get away with building nukes while twiddling your thumbs and denouncing Reagan as he was dealing with the Soviet nukes!
It just boggles my mind that he thinks this!
ZD,LOL!From what I have heard
March 9, 2007 - 23:35 ET by bigtimerZD,
LOL!
From what I have heard she is just as liberal...plus she can always do something about it, I have no pity.
Oh god! The images you put in
March 10, 2007 - 00:49 ET by AtheistRepublicanOh god! The images you put in my head! You keep suggesting such things to us and your going to make Chris Mathews right, because now, someone having ... you know... with him. I can not even say the name of the act in question without severe nausea, thanks alot, jerk!
I'm really shocked everyone
March 10, 2007 - 06:42 ET by SomerTeethI'm really shocked everyone is attacking Chris Matthews (and his wife) without trying to put his comments into the context of the entire segment. That never happens here, does it?
Chris Matthews wasn't saying that Consrvatives don't like to engage in the act of sex. The point Matthews was trying to make is that Liberals and Conservatives approach social issues and religion from different angles, and that neither approach is good or bad. His assertion is that each of them have, in essence, tried to take ownership over certain social issues (i.e we're the party of family values, etc.). Conservatives focus very heavily on social issues relating to sex. Generally, they have made very strong efforts to stop pre-marital sex, condom distribution in schools, sexual content on TV, etc. When he said they "don't like" sex, he was saying they don't like the way sex is used/displayed in our society in general. He wasn't saying that their view point is wrong at all.
Focusing on one sentence of the entire segent of the program doesn't capture the essence of the entire conversation.
ST
------
"<Insert lame cliche' quote here>"
Um....yeah, ok. You've appare
March 10, 2007 - 07:51 ET by HypocriteHaterUm....yeah, ok. You've apparently found some hidden meaning to his words about conservatives not liking sex, that even Chris wouldn't admit he said. Try again.
Now let's hear your lame, snotty, response.
Oh, you poor girl. I forgo
March 10, 2007 - 12:59 ET by SomerTeethOh, you poor girl. I forgot you're used to having all of the Republican talking points spoon fed to you by Fox News. Having to interpret any nuances of a discussion is asking a little too much of you, isn't it?
First of all, did you even watch the show? I'm sure you took the lazy, uninformed route of just reading the snippet posted on this site. The segment was about the politics of religion and how each party picks certain parts of the Christian faith to "claim" as their own. Consequently, they build their messages around those parts of Christianity to which they've claimed.
Just for fun, you might want to read the text of what was actually said during the segment.
...."But, isn't this kind of cherry picking? The Liberals will talk about poverty and injustice, and racism, and nuclear war, and pick that part of the Christain message from Jesus. And, the Conservatives will find the evils of sodomy, the evils of infidelity, the evils of sex of any form. It seems like Conservatives don't like sex, and they're very focused on that end, and the Liberals are focused on social injustice. You just pick the part of the Christian message that you like."
Anyone with more than 3 brain cells can understand the context of Matthews' comment, and that it wasn't a knock against Conservatives. And, he certainly wasn't saying that Conservatives don't like to participate in sex. He's saying they don't like any of the evils of sex (i.e. sodomy), and they focus on speaking out against them. Whereas the Liberals focus on speaking out against other social issues.
It's not too complicated to understand (at least for most of us).
ST
------
"<Insert lame cliche' quote here>"
ST...What would we all do wit
March 10, 2007 - 13:07 ET by bigtimerST...
What would we all do without your infinite wisdom?
One guess ST...
Somer you poor thing - let'
March 10, 2007 - 13:07 ET by Dee BunkSomer you poor thing - let's see that type of analysis on what Coulter said. Is that too hard when you are used to being spoon fed? Coulter was making a joke about the Grey's star who needed to go into rehab for using the term faggot. No one in their right mind could think that she actually thought Edwards was Gay.
This blog is about hypocrisy and how every little thing said by a conservative is made to be evil and gone over and over in the media when more offensive (or at least equally fake offensive) is ignored by them.
Somer you poor thing - let'
March 10, 2007 - 18:01 ET by SomerTeethSomer you poor thing - let's see that type of analysis on what Coulter said. Is that too hard when you are used to being spoon fed? Coulter was making a joke about the Grey's star who needed to go into rehab for using the term faggot. No one in their right mind could think that she actually thought Edwards was Gay.
Coulter? Hey genius, where in my post did I refer to Coulter? Go lie down on the couch and rest that mushy brain of yours.
But, thanks for the effort anyway.
ST
-------
"<Insert lame cliche' here>"
Context
March 10, 2007 - 18:20 ET by gfrrman"....I'm really shocked everyone is attacking Chris Matthews (and his wife) without trying to put his comments into the context of the entire segment....".SOMERTEETH. So did you see that word CONTEXT in YOUR quote? Now try that context thing with Coulter's comments, genius!! Binky-time, ST !!!
SOMERTEETH. So did you see
March 11, 2007 - 09:23 ET by SomerTeethSOMERTEETH. So did you see that word CONTEXT in YOUR quote? Now try
that context thing with Coulter's comments, genius!! Binky-time, ST !!!
-----------------------------
Who said anything about Coulter? You're asking me to discuss the comments of someone unrelated to the Chris Matthews issue, and ones I have neither attacked nor defended. I could care less about her, whether it's in "context" or out of "context". She's nothing more than a pimple on the a$$ of society.
ST
-----------
"<Insert lame cliche' quote here>"
No one in their right mind c
March 10, 2007 - 18:31 ET by balboaNo one in their right mind could think that she actually thought Edwards was Gay.
No but they could think that Coulter was inferring she wanted to call Edwards a faggot.
Somertooth has brain-rot
March 10, 2007 - 13:38 ET by RJSomerteeth, tooth decay has clearly reached your brain, and any hint of logical thought capacity has rotted away.
"He certainly wasn't saying Conservatives don't like to participate in sex." In your own quote, Matthews said "It seems like Conservatives don't like sex" That's pretty straightforward stuff, rottedtooth, and even a liberal should get it.
"Matthews comment...wasn't a knock against Conservatives" hahahaha! You're a riot! Only a rotted-brain habitue of DUmmie-type sites could make that claim. Yeah, right. The good liberals focus on social justice and the bad conservatives focus on sex, but it wasn't a knock. hahahaha! Do you really believe this tripe, or are you laughing when you type it?
"Matthews comment...wa
March 10, 2007 - 17:49 ET by SomerTeeth"Matthews comment...wasn't a knock against Conservatives" hahahaha! You're a riot! Only a rotted-brain habitue of DUmmie-type sites could make that claim. Yeah, right. The good liberals focus on social justice and the bad conservatives focus on sex, but it wasn't a knock. hahahaha! Do you really believe this tripe, or are you laughing when you type it?
--------------------------------------
Come on RJ. Are you really that dumb? Why are you Conservatives so defensive and paranoid about the issue of sex? Conservatives have definitely proven that they like it, whether it's gay sex (Ted Haggert), pedophilia (Mark Foley, Phillip Giordano, Dan Crane, Buz Lukens, Strom Thurmond), phone sex (Bill O'Reilly), or adulterous sex (Newt Gingrich, Rudy Guiliani, Rush Limbaugh, etc.).
Take it easy, nobody's trying to take your sex away. Everything will be ok.
ST
ST that it sure would be har
March 10, 2007 - 18:08 ET by BlazerST that it sure would be hard to beat what you posted above, I guess you just caught us with our pants down. No pun intended.
What would Liberals do without sex ST, I mean without conception, they would lose thier ability to kill the poor defenseless, enslaved in the womb, disguised as a womans right to choose
. I mean we all know you guys dont' have the spine to kill anything, that can kill back.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
Somertooth's social promotions and self esteem
March 10, 2007 - 21:47 ET by RJRottedtooth, I picked your lame post apart with specifics. In response, the only defense you're capable of mounting is a litany of generalized non-sequiturs to my post and you call me "dumb?" hahaha.
Apparently, you've been the benificary of repeated "social promotions" throughout school....but at least they taught you to have "self-esteem."
Rottedtooth, I picked your
March 11, 2007 - 09:45 ET by SomerTeethRottedtooth, I picked your lame post apart with specifics. In response, the only defense you're capable of mounting is a litany of generalized non-sequiturs to my post and you call me "dumb?" hahaha.
Well, first of all, the only thing you "picked apart" was your nose. You didn't offer any counter point to the comments I posted. All you did was make lame jokes about two of the comments.
Apparently, you've been the benificary of repeated "social promotions" throughout school....but at least they taught you to have "self-esteem."
I would assume by "social promotions", you're suggesting either a race-based or gender-based promotion, correct? I never would have figured you for a racist, RJ. I'm shocked.
Listen, it shouldn't make you angry that I finished high school and college. I know it always upset you to see me and my friends speeding by as you sat in the back of the short bus. I also know being a 15-year-old 2nd grader was tough for you. And, I know it crushed you when you found out your parents were protecting your feelings by telling you everyone else was graduating because of "social promotions". But, come on RJ, turn the page.
ST
-------
"<Insert lame cliche' quote here>"
Geez, rot-brain, could you be any more boring?
March 11, 2007 - 10:20 ET by RJGeez, rot-brain, could you be any more boring? Even your lame, hackneyed insults are boring. (but I bet you have a lot of self-esteem, right?)
Leave it to a leftist to drag race or gender into a perfectly good personal insult. Why do you automatically go there? Because, despite of their sanctimonious preaching, leftists are the true narrow-minded racists and bigots.
I realize that, for you, it would take a huge, almost insurmountable effort, but do go back and read my first post to you. Better yet, get someone to break it down for you. For the first time, you might be able to actually look reasonably intelligent if you try to respond specifically, rather pounding out your foolish, rambling non-sequiturs.
"He certainly wasn't s
March 11, 2007 - 11:21 ET by SomerTeeth"He certainly wasn't saying Conservatives don't like to participate in sex." In your own quote, Matthews said "It seems like Conservatives don't like sex" That's pretty straightforward stuff, rottedtooth, and even a liberal should get it.
Again, you imbicile. Let's try this again. He was refering the issues of sex, not the act itself. You're picking one sentence out of the entire conversation without relating to the rest of the conversation.
"Matthews comment...wasn't a knock against Conservatives" hahahaha! You're a riot! Only a rotted-brain habitue of DUmmie-type sites could make that claim. Yeah, right. The good liberals focus on social justice and the bad conservatives focus on sex, but it wasn't a knock. hahahaha! Do you really believe this tripe, or are you laughing when you type it?
If you choose to take it as a knock against Conservatives, it's your choice. But, it' seems as though you're projecting your own insecurities. As a Liberal, I actually interpreted his comments as a compliment to both Conservatives and Liberals (but maybe I'm too optimistic). I think it's great that Conservatives speak out against sexual issues (pre-marital sex, sodomy, and the sanctity of the sex/marriage). I wish more Liberals would do the same.
You see, every issue isn't always as simple as black and white, yet you seem to want to draw that line with Matthews' comments. He wasn't saying "Good Liberals focus on social issues, and bad Conservatives focus on sex". At no point did he say Conservatives don't care about social issues, nor did he say Liberals don't care about sexual issues. He was simply pointing out that politicians (on both sides) favor certain issues that may or may not resonate with their base of support.
I know you're severely challenged, but hopefully that makes a little more sense to you. Don't hurt yourself trying to think about it.
ST
-------
"<Insert lame cliche' quite here>"
Well, it's a start, Tooth
March 11, 2007 - 12:55 ET by RJWell, it's a start, Tooth. This time, at least, you're making an effort to address the specifics at hand....baby steps to be sure, but an effort nontheless.
See, the problem with your halting, but hopefully developing, thought process is that you focus on the nearest bright object and stop looking. You said, "you're picking one sentence" as if it was the only time he said it, and as if was out of context. Actually, Matthews made the allusion twice in consecutive sentences. First, he said, "It seems Conservatives will find the evils of sodomy, the evils of infidelity, the evils of sex in any form." Then, to reinforce it, in the next sentence he said, "It seems like Conservatives don't like sex..." Jeez, how many times does he have to slap you with it before you get it?
Returning to the other part of our discussion regarding your inability to grasp the obvious, we have this rib-tickler: You claim that Matthews was "complimenting" conservatives for focusing on the "evils' of sex....even as liberals focus on the larger issues of social injustice. For them (according to Matthews) that would include poverty, injustice, racism, and nuclear war, as they "pick that part of the Christian message from Jesus".
C'mon, Tooth. Surely, even you have adequate mental facilities to read such a blatant subtext from Matthews....don't you?
ST...Where do you come up wit
March 10, 2007 - 21:54 ET by Clear thinkerST...
Where do you come up with "conservatives are defensive and paranoid about the issue of sex"?
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Clear,He made it up, of cours
March 10, 2007 - 21:56 ET by BlondeClear,
He made it up, of course.
The only thing libs are more defensive about than BO and HRC is sex!
You know, Clinton and the cigars.
Sheesh.
Blonde..I know he made it up,
March 10, 2007 - 22:00 ET by Clear thinkerBlonde..
I know he made it up, that's why I asked.
Liberals...silly people!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Clear,Where do all of these s
March 10, 2007 - 22:02 ET by BlondeClear,
Where do all of these silly libs come from?
Is there some sort of silly lib factory?
And what is their compunction to come here and post such idiocy? Like we haven't seen it a thousand times before?
Blonde...It's some crazy cult
March 10, 2007 - 22:11 ET by Clear thinkerBlonde...
It's some crazy cult or something. Or maybe their all sharing the same needle and have the same disease.
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
The only thing libs are mor
March 11, 2007 - 09:08 ET by SomerTeethThe only thing libs are mor
March 11, 2007 - 09:10 ET by SomerTeethThe only thing libs are more defensive about than BO and HRC is sex!
------------------------------
Defensive about BO and HRC? Obviously you don't understand the concept of "defensive". One is "defensive" of something they care about, or a personal quality he or she possesses. I could care less about BO or HRC. I find their idiocy and hypocrisy both humorous and sad all at the same time.
ST
----
"<Insert lame cliche' quote here>"
Either way it's wrong
March 10, 2007 - 13:05 ET by exLibEven IF the sentence was taken "out of context" the whole statement is incorrect and illustrates the warped way Liberals think of themselves and also demonstrates that you can't just pick a policy and try to wrap the Bible around it which is blatantly what the Dems are trying to do lately.
After 2004 all of a sudden there was this important voting block that couldn't be marginalized anymore, although they still tried and are trying to all the time.
I remember hearing Howard Dean saying the Democrats need to "Frame" their issue in terms of Biblical values in order to win over "values voters".
I for one was NOT a Republican first, i was and am a Christian first, but when I studied and LISTENED to canidates I found that the Republican Party better supports Christian values.
I find that when I talk to fellow Christians who happen to support liberals it usually turns out that they were liberal to begin with and never re-evaluated their political leaning in light of their new Christian Values.
If you read the Bible you'll find that the sins that get talked about the most are Sexual Sins. They are the most incidious and dangerous of sins; Immorality, Adultery, Homosexaulity are all sins that keep you out of heaven if you practice them, so why should Christians not want to talk about them in the polltical arena.
Of course Conservatives are concerned with "Social" issues it's just that in most cases like poverty we believe that the individual in conjunction with the Church is the best way to help others, NOT the Governement.
Also, Jesus lived in a time dominated by wars, conquest and violence that makes today seem like a G rated movie (although it is getting worse). All Jesus said to a Roman Soldier was to be content with his pay and not to take advantage of people under his command. Jesus was never an anti-war protestor!
Obviously he is incapable o
March 10, 2007 - 00:39 ET by FairlightObviously he is incapable of finishing a complete sentence:
“conservatives don’t like sex...with him.”
Mathews Just Another Michael Moore
March 10, 2007 - 00:52 ET by majorJust a low-life liberal goon.........his job in the Clinton Mafia is to distract the public and promote the image that Republicans are inept, incompetent, impotent, intellectually backward, bullies, rascists, unimaginative, uncreative, dull-witted, boorish, etc, etc...
This is part of the larger attack strategy to wear and tear down their opponents...
I know one thing Bush Republicans have shown is that they are politically naive, in that they dont realize who they are up against in the Clinton Democrats; who live 24/7 to defeat their opponents with dirty tricks...he who wins the propaganda war, wins the election......the Bush Administration sits back like a bunch of aristocrats who think the fray is beneath them....this may be interpreted as; " if the fray is beneath them then the average voter is too..."
The Republicans have to get off their high horse, roll up their sleeves and do battle with the Clintonista's in the trenches....or the voters confidence will continue to erode
Frankly, I am not sure Bush Republicans are up to it
If conservatives don't like
March 10, 2007 - 02:42 ET by John in CAIf conservatives don't like sex, then why are they procreating at a faster rate than liberals? Must be that immaculate conception thing.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
John,What an excellent point.
March 10, 2007 - 10:36 ET by msh1973John,
What an excellent point. My niece is getting ready to have baby #4, and she is a conservative. I know that is a lame point, but it sounds good. LOL!
And don't forget all those co
March 10, 2007 - 10:49 ET by Del DolemonteAnd don't forget all those conservative Mormons with their multiple wives (like Mitt Romney's grandfather). As I recall, Newt and Rudy Giuliani have had multiple wives too-just not all at the same time like the Mormons!
How can Liberals reproduce wh
March 10, 2007 - 12:39 ET by ZoneDaiatlasHow can Liberals reproduce when their partners look like Rosie O'Donnell or Bill Maher.
Actually I'm thinking... Co
March 10, 2007 - 07:05 ET by Jack BauerActually I'm thinking it's more like...
Conservatives don't like Chris Matthews....
No matter how many times he screws us.
OMG Jack,There ya go again!Pr
March 10, 2007 - 12:07 ET by bigtimerOMG Jack,
There ya go again!
Priceless...that's what your way with words are...priceless!
LMAO!
too bad chris' parent were no
March 10, 2007 - 10:44 ET by buddyctoo bad chris' parent were not republicans. the world would be a better place.
Peaceniks don't like sex!
March 10, 2007 - 11:48 ET by Dee BunkPeaceniks don't like sex! Did anyone happen to see "The Lives of Others"? There was a great line in there where one of the Stasi guys says that he likes being assigned to watch artists because they are at it (sex) all the time - unlike religious people and peaceniks.
Isn't that great! Now the artists don't only think religious people don't like sex, they think peaceniks don't either. It's so funny how artists (and other celebs)think that they are the only ones who enjoy sex, just because they need to do it with lots of different people. It's actually the opposite. I think they must not like it , or else they would settle with one person so they could get it when ever they wanted. It's never enjoyable enough for them so they keep looking for someone who is better at it never realizing that the problem is with themselves.
People like Chris Mathews and Bill Maher who are pasty white boys with two minute problems, like to blame their problems on people's religion, skin color or politics so they can keep trying it and hope it works better with someone else.
Dee
March 10, 2007 - 12:05 ET by Noel SheppardDee,
Actually, with Matthews in this instance, I think this is all about Clinton. Remember, he pointed specifically to Republican concern for sodomy and infidelity. That's Clinton, right?
The reality is the media and the brainwashed left truly believe that impeachment was about oral sex with Monica. They never seemed to understand the real issue: perjury, suborning perjury, and obstruction of justice.
Of course, the delicious irony here is that Libby might end up going to jail for perjury and obstruction of justice. The media and the brainwashed left are celebrating like they won the Super Bowl over a Vice Presidential aide being so convicted. Yet, to this day, they believe a President committing the same felonious acts is acceptable. And, they fail to see the obvious hypocrisy in their position.
Shocking, wouldn't you agree?
Yes Noel - and with Libby -
March 10, 2007 - 12:14 ET by Dee BunkYes Noel - and with Libby - I don't care if a jury convicted him - there is no way you can prove that someone didn't forget who they talked to about something. That is extremely common. It's not very common to forget who you had oral sex with, especially when reminded, even if you do sleep around as much as someone like Clinton.
Dee
March 10, 2007 - 12:21 ET by Noel SheppardDee,
Well, the much bigger issue was the suborning of perjury and the obstruction of justice. Lying about an extra-marital affair sadly is almost the American way today. However, using the power of his office to pressure folks to lie to investigators was the real issue, and serious enough for him to get disbarred.
Bear in mind that the ABA doesn't like disbarring attorneys. It's not all that easy to get kicked out of that club once you're in it. Yet, this organization felt Clinton's behaviors were serious enough to toss him even though he is an ex-president.
Regardless, the left and the vapid continue to think this was all about sex. Shocking. ns
I agree Noel and it was ne
March 10, 2007 - 12:30 ET by Dee BunkI agree Noel and it was never about sex - it was about sexual harassment and having sex with an intern is very relevant to sexual harassment. The biggest issue as you say though is the obstruction. That was real obstruction - using power to pressure other people. Libby didn't do that, he just didn't remember a conversation about something that wasn't even a crime for him. Completely different and it's a shame that he will go to jail while Clinton remains free.
Mornin' Dee,...and on top of
March 10, 2007 - 12:38 ET by bigtimerMornin' Dee,
...and on top of that, it was conversations with leftist so-called journalists...
What a sad situation when it comes to something like this to bring down a man and all his years of work, let alone his family and friends that love and respect this man.
Past pathetic.
Hi BT, It is very sad. Lib
March 10, 2007 - 12:48 ET by Dee BunkHi BT,
It is very sad. Liberals are so vindictive and hateful that they really don't care that this man has a family and that he didn't do anything other than hold different political opinions from them. Look at Sandy Burglar - stealing classified documents and no jail for him either and Libby is going to jail for not remembering a conversation.
Do these liberals all think that they are always going to hold all of the same political opinions as their leaders? It's just crazy. Bush better pardon him.
Dee,Speaking of Burglar, Hann
March 10, 2007 - 12:56 ET by bigtimerDee,
Speaking of Burglar, Hannity is going to be doing a special investigative segment on him on his Sunday show I saw last night advertized. Don't know if there will be anything new, but I am going to try and catch it, at least Fox isn't letting it go...as all of the msm shouldn't.
Stealing from the doc's from the National Archives (for the Clintoon's, no less), three or four times and all he gets is a slap on the wrist!
Talk about hypocrisy and injustice!
Thanks BT - I will have to
March 10, 2007 - 13:13 ET by Dee BunkThanks BT - I will have to try and catch that as long as it doesn't conflict with Desperate Housewives. It was good to see you. I'm signing off now - catch you next time.
Funny I was just thinking about this
March 10, 2007 - 13:09 ET by exLibFunny I didn't see the segment but was just thinking about this the other day.
It's the old Liberal attack/response when talking about sexual issues.
If a Conservative starts the conversation about restricting condoms to teens or talking about abstinence only the old Liberal cannard would come out about how Conservatives "never get any" usually directed at a woman.
And the sad part is they used to get away with it. At least with Fox News you can have the Conservative side of the debate heard.
This article is called "
March 10, 2007 - 14:29 ET by MBombardierThis article is called "Revenge of the Church Ladies" and it's about how conservative, married, monogamous, church-going women have better and more fulfilling sex than the so-called "sexually-liberated" feminists. That collar is buttoned up to the neck to hide the fire inside...
http://www.ptm.org/01PT/JulAug/revenge.htm
Conservatives like hetrosexua
March 10, 2007 - 14:37 ET by garvinConservatives like hetrosexual relationships just fine, but I guess that's so 1990's.
Once again, Matthews has boil
March 12, 2007 - 08:40 ET by GalvanicOnce again, Matthews has boiled American politics down to a 5th grader's perspective, apparently in an attempt to proclaim liberals more Christian than conservatives. And once again, he comes off as a fool.