MSNBC and CNN Jump to Showcase Time Mag Cover with Cheney Under Dark Cloud

Photo of Brent Baker.
  • Bookmark and Share

Time magazine's cover story image as reality? Displaying a mini-instance of pack journalism, MSNBC and CNN shows on Thursday afternoon and night pounced on Time magazine's cover story, “The Verdict on Cheney” beside a picture of Cheney under some dark clouds, as evidence Cheney's influence is declining in the White House in the wake of the Scooter Libby verdict. It may be, but the graphics on a magazine cover hardly proves it. Plugging an interview with Michael Duffy, the author of the cover story, MSNBC's Chris Matthews asserted on Hardball: “More coming here about amazing problems facing the Vice President. He's on the cover of Time magazine as we speak and it looks bad.”

On CNN's Paula Zahn Now, Zahn trumpeted how “tonight we're bring out into the open Vice President Cheney's downhill slide” which is “not pretty” and is illustrated by, as she instructed viewers, “Look at the cover of the new Time magazine: The Vice President under a dark cloud. The headline: 'The Verdict on Cheney.' The story inside even brands him as 'the enemy within' the White House, dragging the whole administration down with him." Over on MSNBC's Countdown at the same 8pm EST hour, fill-in host Alison Stewart highlighted how “special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald referred to the quote, 'cloud over the Vice President' in his summation at the Libby trial. The folks at Time magazine painting that cloud over Mr. Cheney quite literally in their art for the new cover story, going as far as to call him quote, 'one of Bush's biggest liabilities.'"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

“Cheney In Twilight” reads the table of contents headline for the Time.com posting of the story in the March 19 edition of the magazine to be released on Friday, a title which is also displayed as the headline over the story inside the hard copy of the magazine. The summary for the article: “Bush chose him because he was safe and sound. But the Libby trial spotlighted a Vice President whose overbearing style has become one of the Administration's biggest problems.”

As recounted in a NewsBusters posting by Geoffrey Dickens, Thursday's Today show featured the Time cover as Meredith Vieira inquired of Tim Russert:

“Friday's issue of Time magazine is gonna feature a cover story on the Vice President. It's written by Michael Duffy. And among other things Duffy writes, 'Cheney has become the administration's enemy within, the man whose single-minded pursuit of ideological goals, creaking political instincts and love of secrecy produced an independent operation inside the White House that has done more harm than good.' You understand the workings of the White House. What is your reaction to that assessment?"

Zahn's intro in full for her March 8 segment, with Time's "Cheney in Twilight" two-page spread displayed on screen:

“Tonight we're bring out into the open Vice President Cheney's downhill slide. The perjury and obstruction of justice verdicts this week against his ex-Chief-of-Staff, Scooter Libby, is focusing more attention on the Vice President this week more than ever and it's not pretty. Look at the cover of the new Time magazine: The Vice President under a dark cloud. The headline: 'The Verdict on Cheney.' The story inside even brands him as 'the enemy within' the White House, dragging the whole administration down with him.”

Alison Stewart teased at the top of Countdown, with the cover displayed on screen:

“Once a revered decision and policy-maker in the White House's inner-circle, now not so much. A look at the role of the Vice President. Is Dick Cheney, as Time magazine points out, indeed the enemy within?”

Stewart set up the subsequent segment:

“Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald referred to the quote, 'cloud over the Vice President' in his summation at the Libby trial. The folks at Time magazine painting that cloud over Mr. Cheney quite literally in their art for the new cover story, going as far as to call him quote, 'one of Bush's biggest liabilities.'”

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Take Jimmy Carter's incompete

Take Jimmy Carter's incompetence and stir in Richard Nixon's corruption and you have the Bush Administration.  In this administration the part of Spiro Agnew is played by Dick Cheney. 

Yes, it is a very bad adminis

Yes, it is a very bad administration. I thought their attempt to change Social Security was going to be the only failure; however, little did I know that everything was going to fall apart.

You two are a riot!LOL!

You two are a riot!

LOL!

I am curious who can actually

I am curious who can actually defend Cheney's behavior even on this far right wing site?

Roger Ailes?? You have to be kidding.

I can.  Want to try me again

I can.  Want to try me again, Hayes?

If it needed defending we wou

If it needed defending we would defend it - now how about you terrorist lovers defending your war-on-terror treason:)?

I challenge these so-called "peace-activists" to organize JUST ONE MAJOR D.C. PROTEST AGAINST AL QUEDA by the end of 2007...

raze..Dick Cheney is a patrio

raze..

Dick Cheney is a patriot...something you wouldn't even understand you ungrateful leftist troll...I do not know know why you are even left on this site... all you do is disrupt every single thread, why don't you take it over to your home base SFN....I am so sick of you.

Cheney is a patriot??when he

Cheney is a patriot??

when he was avoiding the draft or blowing the cover of the CIA?

"why don't you take it over to your home base SFN?Go play with yourselves elsewhere."

As Bush stated in Brazil,

Isn't it wonderful that we have free speech.

"Do not divert the thread"

Forgive me , kind BT, but were we not talking about Cheney?

only as long as you are tolerated, hayes

It's a privately owned site hayes. You have free speech here only as long as you are tolerated.  Some day, without warning, you'll get the "access denied" message.  It's only a matter of time.   Until then, you can be our very own goofy bobble-head doll.

Forgive me, Rj. I dont want t

Forgive me, Rj. I dont want to go through the post traumatic stress that Hays went through when he found access denied to his favorite site. He is undergoing intensive therapy...

I realize that this is a private site, so I will have to accept that I cannot respond or debate here for fear of that traumatic experience.

Let me rephrase that Cheney did a wonderful job of discrediting Wilson and his wife didnt belong in the Cia.

He did the only patriotic thing. He is wonderful man. 

You and razey ought to go on

You and razey ought to go on the buddy plan with Rosie and do the inversion therapy she does...

Hang upside down for the rest of your lives...that'll fix ya up!

Just like it has her...look at the wonderful results.

Well, with all due respect

Well, with all due respect to RJ, I don't hate you Schmidtty. Thread all you want (or whatever we call it). I find your Liberal insight to be, uh, well, at this point you haven't actually submitted anything of real value, but that's always something to look forward to. After all, me and my guns are just itching for a convicing Liberal/Secular Progressive/Sold My Soul to Satan argument that we might be able to give up wholly and completely to. Quite frankly, it's about time I replaced my sillhouettes with religious symbols (of Christianity only of course).

Are you feeling the love? I am.

Ha, Bullet

Ha, Bullet.  I don't hate the schmidt/hayes bobblehead doll, either.  How can you hate an insensate creature?

What is the purpose of this site?

RJ,

I thought the purpose of this site was to learn, educate and be educated. So as long as someone is being polite, respectful, and relevant, why would you want them to shut up, just because you disagree? You disagree because of a reason correct? Why don't you share your reasons for maintaining an alternative understand and allow people to learn from your perspective?

cj,I can answer your questi

cj,

I can answer your question. RJ is talking to a specific type of poster known as a "troll". They cannot be reasoned with. Reason and debate are concepts they do not understand. They come here to bash bush and republicans, and thats it. They live in their mothers basements and hit NB between rounds on the XBOX. Favorite foods are cheetos and Dr. Pepper.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM

Ha, MM.  Too true.  I can only add that cj doesn't have to worry:  the one thing you cannot do is make a troll shut up.   In fact, they put little stars on their calendars when someone says that to them. 

But all Trolls have insecurities, and you CAN play on those.  ;^>

welcome to free speech

You make this impotent charge because of free speech. You're gutless because you pimp free speech in the presence of patriots who defend your free speech. Schmidt for president of the Debating Society; he/she who pimps online for the Murtha Minority and Cut & Run.

Dick Cheney most certainly IS a patriot.

I don't think anybody really

I don't think anybody really can, except for right-wing groupies. Do a Google on very powerful Republicans and Conservatives that are even ditching the Bush administration. I thought atleast G.W. would have stood against illegal invasion/immigration but I was wrong.

Do not divert the thread mm..

Do not divert the thread mm...go to open thread and talk about illegal immigration would you...or say HuffnPuff...or any other leftist blog site...DU is a good place for you.

Geesh....you trolls get so F'n boring.

Go play with yourselves elsewhere.

I suggest you discuss this il

I suggest you discuss this illegal invasion with El Guapo, our good friend Senor Tumbler.  He will give you what I gurantee is a unique perspective on this topic.

Oh darn NL...I was hoping yo

Oh darn NL...

I was hoping you wouldn't do that...

LOL!

Besides that I am sure they know it...that's why they brought it up...the jerks.

Ok, I just did a search on Tu

Ok, I just did a search on Tumbler and El Guapo in the archives of this site. I read the entire section about immigration. wow. I definitely will never bring that subject up again.

Why not?  He is dead wrong a

Why not?  He is dead wrong about it.  Even some liberals agree that US borders are sovreign and that illegal immigration is a violation of that sovreignty.  He advocates the invasion of cockroaches scuttling across our border with Mexico and taunts everyone that the government refuses to defend the border in any effective way.  And then he calls himself a patriot and conservative afterwards!

this is one of the racists

Notice the post by NL207;

NL is a racist, unabashed and not able to conceal it. But here, his main concern isn't immigration, just striking back at old tumbler. (Who, telling you all the truth, is a conservative.)

702LN is a white supremacist and hate-mongering racist. He calls Mexicans "cockroaches". He calls them an invasion of bugs, therefore not human beings. --PLUS; NL lies; He says, I "advocate" the invasion. but I really support the law. Deport and/or arrest illegals, that's my take. I've stated it a hundred times.

He has no clue what "sovereignty" stands for. But it sounds neat, so he locks and loads a fifty cent word. Ordinarily he --or SHE, can't tell,

Ordinarily he/she would use trash talk; today it's "sovereignty. What a joke. My biggest regret is we're both in the same Republican Party. He actually belongs with those guys in long robes who used to throw black men down the wells in olden times. --KKK, all the way! NL207 brands us cockroaches; look out! That guy in the pointy mask!

good idea, mostly

I hope you don't object to the dispute. In fact my name here isn't el guapo; it's tumbler.

Some folks want to prove a weak point by belittling an opponent. I like to cut to the chase. When one understands a situation like immigration problems in the U.S., no bullsh^t is needed. Once in a while Roger is amusing. His idea of Mexicans, hispanics and the way out of our problems is only to try to make me a fool. If you read my rationale, you'll realize he failed. (But he always tries again.)

Say, you must be a liberal.

Say, you must be a liberal...look, don't worry, be happy! I know it
is rather ominous and dark through your lens at present, but one day
soon you'll be kicking back, suckin' down Cosmo's and Skunk Weed with
George Soros and Satan while toasting tofu dogs in the fire and
brimstone thinking about how very right (er, left) you were all along. I can dig
it. So who cares if Cheney masterminded the biggest non-issue the White
House ever saw, certainly not Val. Conspiracies are like 3rd degree
sunburns, Bro...the layers can be peeled away, but then all your left with
is something gross that you just want to cover back up anyway.

BTW, I'm working on my PR skills...could you take a moment and give some feedback...thanks.

FullofSchmidt,Let's Play a Ga

FullofSchmidt,

Let's Play a Game...C'Mon....It'll be fun!

I'll defend Cheney, you defend anyone you want.

Anyone....Can't think of anybody......how about:

Bid Laden...or.....Saddam (May he rest in grief)....or Teddy Kennedy...or

Man, this is a blast!

Mostly Annoying,Brilliant pos

Mostly Annoying,

Brilliant post!

I feel like having one of those Guinness beers, only I have to work tomorrow.

If this is such a bad administration, why don't you spank it? That'll teach those nasty Republicans. How dare they disrupt your precious way of life?

Talk about balls, then they attempt to change the almighty social security structure, which we all have the utmost confidence will be enough to buy us several Denny's grand slam breakfasts in the future. There's something about bacon at two in the afternoon that sounds comforting.

The only thing that's falling apart is your sanity if you think the Media hasn't pulled the Democratic wool over your bloodshot eyes.

Why don't you come around whe

Why don't you come around when the day crew is here scumbag.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MightyMouth,Are you talkin' t

MightyMouth,

Are you talkin' to me?

Nope, sorry bud, talking to &

Nope, sorry bud, talking to "schmidt" ...too late gotta go. cheers!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Didn't think so. I'm so touch

Didn't think so. I'm so touchy lately. See ya.

On this site, the part of Idi

On this site, the part of Idiot is played by BillAdkins.

You can't take Jimmy's incompetance, it's something you leave, similar to something you leave in the bathroom.

Stir in Nixon's corruption all you want, still looks bad on you. He kicked the crap out of your side twice in 68 and 72. In fact, before King Bill Semen Skirt, weren't you guys like 1 win, 6 losses since Kennedy. Current scoreboard in the modern era, Good Guys 8, Bleeding Hearts 3. That's almost a mercy rule! And remember, you guys have had the whine and cry level on high for decades.

Spiro Agnew compared to Dick Cheney? I guess... Of course, I'll take Dick in a cockfight.

Stuck in the 60's and 70's? Y

Stuck in the 60's and 70's? You are laughable! LOL!!!!!

edit... neo, sorry late and posting wrong. later....

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

I notice you come here and ma

I notice you come here and make one outrageous post then leave. Your typical of what is known as "the drive by media", but in your case it's "the drive by in need of medication". you got me to thinking who was jimmy's VP but it didn't come to me at all. Know why? He's irrelevant, just like you.

My above comment was posted f

My above comment was posted for mr. billadkins. Sorry I didn't realize it would be lost so far down in the thead. I will try to make my personal comments readily addressable in the future.

I know I am here talking to m

I know I am here talking to myself, but it is when I like to catch up on all the previous days news. I rarely am online to get in a live discussion, so I will just leave my comments now and hope the objects of my derision come back to "admire" thier handiwork posted the previous night.
Mostlymoderate
Yes, it is a very bad administration. I thought their attempt to change Social Security was going to be the only failure; however, little did I know that everything was going to fall apart.
The above comment tells me all I will ever want to know about you. Your typical liberal shortsightedness is very revealing. How many Ponzi schemes are you in on? I hope you are well off because if you depend on SS to get you by in your later years your going to be in for a big surprise. Oh, but I forgot, your part of the class of people who live and breath only for today, with your arms outstretched saying "gimme, gimme, gimme."

And this final reply is for m

And this final reply is for ms. shmitt or hayes or whatever it is known by. Your life would be a lot more fulfilled if you could aspire to be like Mr. Cheney. Even if in anything you did you dedicated yourself to it, sacrificing time, money and good will like the vice president does would be a step in the right direction. I do not come to this site to read trolls like you, but I realize you are free to go where you wish and say what you will. Just be advised that you will be treated like the piece of shmitt you are. You would be better off if you took the advice of other posters and took your sideshow to HP, Kos or DU where the others of your ilk can commiserate with each other as you try to save the world. A good start would be to stay there.

That's okay - I found it. You

That's okay - I found it. You know, I don't live on this blog as others do - I have a real job.  That said, my post that set all these people off is accurate and on point. As the colonel said, 'the truth? you can't handle the truth."

Oh, and I would agree with yo

Oh, and I would agree with you about Mondale - I despised him as much as I did Carter. I voted for Reagan twice and Bush I once.  Must I remind you of Dan Quayle?  But Ronald Reagan would be a Democrat today because the GOP has become a gross perversion of what he envisioned.

kooky libs

Don't know why these kooky libs are all wound up about Cheney, after all the democrat wing of their fringe mob party has been in charge of this country since January. All problems were solved in the first 100 hours. Just ask Fancy Nancy.

D

Because they're always angry.

Because they're always angry. Angry at republicans and conservatives. Have you heard or seen a happy lefty dimograts?. Even these two trols are replicas of Mathhews, Rosie, Behar, Vieira and the rest of the lefty groupies. For crying out loud, they already "won" the election, but they can't celebrate yet because they are victims- victims of the Bush adminstration and not by Islamofasismo terrorismo.  Losers! 

I never really thought of it

I never really thought of it that way. Come to think of it, Democrats do always looks a little pissed off and angry.

How strange, I just posted on

How strange, I just posted on open thread about Scarborough having a banner saying...'Dick Cheney...Enemy Within'?

These leftist will keep this up at their own peril in my opinion.

I just saw Roger Ailes win an award at the Radio and News Directors Foundation Awards, he won the 1st Amendment Award, I wished every single person could hear his speech, he was talking directly to the media itself, and to political candidates and their groups, let alone all of us out here...it would do Time Magazine and all their ilk to take notice and listen too.

Btw...I will look for a link tomorrow, I have a link address now but do not know if it is up yet....it is well worth the while to listen to every single word the man said.

Brent, you meant to say &qu

Brent, you meant to say "dark cloud" in your headline, correct?

No worries, just a little nitpick.

What exactly has Cheney done?

Well well well.. if it isn't the 'ol Tazman again...  How you doin you rabid, frothing spewer of rhetoric?

Anyway, I would like you please outline with FACTS of what it is that Cheney has done.  For that matter, can you also tell me exactly what Libby did?  What crime was commited?  Also, why is it that two Jurers have come out and exclaimed that they think A: Libby should get a pardon, and B: They aren't exactly sure what the hell it id he DID.  Plame was outed A lONG time ago by Armitage and her phoney balogna husband with that brilliant book he wrote. 

I await the spew

Sure, I watch the MSM...     Through a pair of crosshairs.

I am actually flattered that

I am actually flattered that you think Im Hays. I will write him an email about it. He should have realized that liberals aren't allowed to respond to the "vitriol".

How dare he criticize the president or his boss? He should have been banned a long time ago.

I admire Cheney. I would follow in his footsteps if I could. I would avoid the draft so I could live to be VP and become a great director of Halliburton. Then I would make sure that my company made lots of money from this war. Corporations would be proud of me! 

I would have done everything the same except for learning how to shoot better when they let the pheasants out of the bag and of course exercise more and avoid fattening foods.

For not being rhayes, you sur

For not being rhayes, you sure have his writing style down cold.

You even have his intense, passionate hatred of capitalism.  You whine about how evil capitalism is as you greedily suck its tit, just as he did.

The way you Leftists and Socialists whine about Cheney, I can't imagine that ANY historian many years down the road won't consider him to be any less than THE most powerful VP in history...

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Kook theory

Here is a kook theory even libertydeath and thoughtpolice can appreciate.  Rhayes/Schmidt is really one of the editors...they take turns to play the liberal nut case so that we can fun booing them off stage.  Every good play needs to have a villian.  That is why these liberals all sound the same, you too can sound liberal if you remove logic, critical thinking, and spout socialism like a preacher at the pulpit.  Since insulting and name calling seem to be a human trait, it isn't a qualifier, but still fun to push buttons until they have their meltdown. 

Ancient fossil Jim Hoagland

Ancient fossil Jim Hoagland has jumped on the piling-on exercise in the WaPo.

Hoagland has been fading for a very long time and fading faster that David Ignatius, a brilliant and
non-ideological colleague at the Post, has been rising in the public
marketplace of ideas.

Hoagland himself used to drop by the US Embassy in Saudi Arabia and
bitch about US foreign policy way back in the last century when I got
his drivel firsthand.

I think Hoagland is projecting some of that perceived mental
instability onto Cheney. Hoagland is over the hill and needs
blog-attention.

Where's the dark cloud hang

Where's the dark cloud hanging over Bill Clinton after the Sandy Burglar verdict? Any American with half a brain cell should be able to spot the blatant leftwing bias.The msm are digging their own graves. I stopped reading TIME years ago. The only decent thing you can do with their paper is wiping your ass.