Are Media Promoting America's Moral Decay?

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

For all those wondering just how many Americans view the media as a major contributor to the moral decay in the country, Cheryl Wetzstein’s article in Thursday’s Washington Times is a must read (h/t NB reader bulletproof, emphasis mine throughout):

Most Americans think culture is becoming more immoral, and they view the media -- both entertainment and news -- as prime culprits, according to a new survey.

If the media continue to "singularly promote" secular values while undermining orthodox faith and values, it will be very difficult to reverse America's moral decline, said the National Cultural Values Survey, released yesterday by the Culture and Media Institute (CMI) of the Media Research Center.

Wetzstein shared some fascinating data from the CMI survey:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

About 31 percent of Americans, regardless of political stripe, are "orthodox" -- faithful Bible-believers who strive to live by "God's teachings and principles," see "a clear set of right and wrong behaviors" in every issue and believe government should be allowed to follow religious principles.

Seventeen percent of Americans, again regardless of political affiliation, are at the "progressive" end of the religious spectrum -- many believe in God, but they strongly disagree that religion is "the most important factor" in forming their values or that religion is "the most essential ingredient" of a good, moral life. Progressives don't want the government to follow religious principles and don't believe that people "should always live by God's teachings and principles."

Interesting that only seventeen percent fall into this category. Given what we see and read in the media, you would imagine this number to be much higher.

This raises an important question: What percentage of the media fall into this “progressive” category?

Regardess of the answer, the article continued:

The largest group of Americans -- 46 percent who described themselves as "independents" -- do not fully identify with either of the other groups. However, they tend to align with the orthodox regarding belief in God, sexual morality and spiritual issues. They reject, for instance, progressive efforts to replace "Merry Christmas" with "Happy Holidays" -- but side with progressives about using personal principles, not "God's teachings," to make certain moral decisions.

Interesting. So, the “progressives” are clearly in the minority concerning religion. Certainly not what is being portrayed by the media, wouldn’t you agree?

Yet, maybe more cautionary were the opinions cited in this article of conservative writer Dinesh D’Souza:

Separately, author and Hoover Institution fellow Dinesh D'Souza argues in his new book, "The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11," that the "cultural left" in America is the primary cause of Islamic anger toward America. 

The cultural left, which includes members of both major political parties and their allies in the press, academia and the nonprofit sector, has "fostered a decadent American culture that angers and repulses traditional societies, especially those in the Islamic world, that are being overwhelmed with this culture," Mr. D'Souza writes on his Web site.

He continued:

"What angers religious Muslims is not the American Constitution but the scandalous sexual mores they see on American movies and television...The person that horrifies them the most is not [free market philosopher] John Locke but Hillary Clinton."

The article concluded:

One solution, Mr. D'Souza says, is for cultural conservatives to join with Muslims and others in condemning the global moral degeneracy that is produced by liberal values and work to halt the spread of such things.  

"As conservatives, we should export our America ... and stop exporting the cultural left's America," he says.

Interesting idea to say the least.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

 The question is a no braine

 The question is a no brainer, even a Troll like J Frank Wilson could get this one. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

Dan... I'm not so sure. In

Dan... I'm not so sure. Invincible Ignorance does exist.

Two points: The MSM are defin

Two points:

The MSM are definitely actively promoting moral decadence - especially the entertainment media.  I would venture to guess that 80-90% of T.V. and Movie writers, directors and producers fall into the 17% minority of "progressives" - should be "regressive."

Secondly, Mr. D'Souza is wrong about Islamic anger being a reaction to American mores, that's just an excuse. 

This is clear when you take note of the Islamic mores of oppression of women -(must-read article), exploitation of children and murder of civilians through terrorism.  The real reasons they hate America include their hatred of freedom and of our ally, Israel.  It's quite revealing that these are also two of the reasons "progressives" hate America.

I guess perhaps it's too obvi

I guess perhaps it's too obvious, but I live by a fairly simple doctrine: if you don't like what you're looking at on the screen (TV or movie) then stop watching!

Most of what comes out of Hollywood these days is crap.  Ditto for TV and Radio (use the "OFF" button).  I have about a half dozen (serial and reality) TV programs that I watch (hooray for TiVo!) on a weekly basis and catch the sports programs at night or on the weekends.  If our (meaning American's) means and manner of entertainment offend our Muslim neighbors, then they don't have to partake!

I can almost see them scaling the internet, offended by what they see, yet they don't turn away?  Train wreck anyone?

--Hokiecon

If our (meaning American) mea

If our (meaning American) means and manner of entertainment offend our Muslim neighbors (?), then they don't have to partake!

With all due respect, Hokie, that's short-sighted. Are you a part of the cultural left? The pilgrims fled for religious freedom, but were always living a generally moral and modest life of mutual and self-respect. That's an inoffensive living to any contemporary culture then and now. They didn't set-off for the New World because they had in mind to shed their garments and have relentless orgies behind the King's back!

I think you are confusing politics with cultural perceptions of intercontinental societies; which, if we were indeed a foremost moral society then our liberating presence would maintain a venerable focus, and the hordes of the common Muslim would cheer daily for such influence (which I believe to be Mr.D'Souza's point) regardless of the brainwashing they must endure!

Hokiecon...sure we can turn o

Hokiecon...sure we can turn off the tv to prevent being exposed to the trash being offered as "entertainment"  But what about all the others - impressionable young people for instance - who don't have someone around to turn off their tvs - they are the ones who are affected by this slime and who, in turn, are impacting our culture WITH A NEGATIVE EFFECT!  What is the old saying?  'Give me your children and I'll change your world' or something along that line.  These children are simply pawns to those in the entertainment industry.  And too few parents are around to counteract the constant feed of tv garbage.

mattm

I'd like to piggyback on your point. Mr. D'Souza also is historically short-sighted. One, this is not the first time the US has had to fight Islamists, for example, the wars during in the late 1700's to keep them from enslaving Americans. Secondly, most of Islamists who rant against the US talk about her so-called oppression of their peoples and they want to seek retribution for this. Lastly, Islamists want power, pure and simple.

The Spring Bunny says YES

The Spring Bunny says YES

Good Concept

One solution, Mr. D'Souza says, is for cultural conservatives to join with Muslims and others in condemning the global moral degeneracy that is produced by liberal values and work to halt the spread of such things. 

This is an interesting concept Noel that I have pondered for quite some time.

It's seems hypocritical of Westerners to call for rational Muslims to denounce the moral degeneracy of terrorism without supporting them in condemning other examples of moral degeneracy promoted and exported by the West.

Such a show of support by Jews/Christians/Hindus etc.could promote a previously unexplored solidarity of moral beliefs with Muslims, particularly in the Middle East.  This very possible unity of similar moral beliefs, jointly imploring a return to more virtuous behavior, could possibly develop an atmosphere of trust between all sides.  It's not an impossible concept as all faiths claim to be descendents of Adam making all members of those faiths brothers and sisters of the God of Adam.  God is to be found in what joins, not seperates.

This could certainly be construed as simply a lofty ideal but why not follow the example presently set by our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan of pursing a working relationship with those of the Muslim faith for a common goal?  If it is working on that regional level certainly such a concept has an opportunity of work on a larger level.

At any rate I am glad such concepts are being discussed at MRC and you brought this to our attention.  What may seem impossible to the creature is not impossible to the Creator. 

News is entertainment. News i

News is entertainment. News is business. Ideology plays a part, but is trumped by the quest for ratings. The public gets what they want, and they want Anna Nicole Smith, even if they say they don't.

Lazy mans logic. That's BS! W

Lazy mans logic. That's BS! What we make exceptions for and what we want are always two different things. It's apathy, Bro!

The MSM are failing the world

The MSM are failing the world in its time of need! Instead of the hope of freedom they spread "their" cynical socialism and self-indulging moral depravity. This war would have been OVER within a year if the MSM had only raised a trumpet themselves! They have brought the world to this point by presuming to be the voice of the people...who said they could do that?

Any solutions?

(thanks for h/t, Noel)

BP

BP,

Don't thank me. You found the piece, and I'm grateful.

Solutions? I think what we're doing is the solution.

As more people get involved in this medium, information is being disseminated at a rate the MSM can't keep up with. Who wants to tune into the evening news broadcasts or wait for the morning papers to learn about events that occurred 14 hours ago?

There's a better, more timely message out there, and we're all now magically a part of it. As a result, I'm very optimistic, as should you be. 

Regards,  ns

Noel,You make an excellent po

Noel,

You make an excellent point.

It seems as though it takes at least two days for anything that is posted here (particularly by the Shrubber) to make even Fox News.

Then, some of the other news outlets follow on.

We've totally discussed, both the up and down side, of most any news story before it is aired on the regular media.

Enchanting, as you say. 

How long will this great state of information last, though?

That is the real question.

Blonde

B,

This medium is just in its infancy. It's only existed for a handful of years.

We're not only witnessing the birth of a new information portal, we're the messengers. And, the folks on the left that believe they are ahead in this race are typically deluding themselves, for their message is almost exclusively a negative one dealing with accusations at the other side rather than advancing solutions or a positive future for those looking for one. 

This is why their readership is so young. After all, that's what children do -- blame their problems on others. By contrast, the right side of the blogosphere are truly presenting a vision to their readers that is positive and energizing.

The depressing left may have been able to win this past round in November, but history has shown that you can only control the electorate with negativity for a brief period of time. Just ask Jimmy Carter.  ns 

Quite so, Noel.We're the mess

Quite so, Noel.

We're the messengers.

Funny, though. The message is not getting through to some of our most, um, "unhearing" friends.

I had a conversation last week, (it was a hoot) with a couple of the typical dem voters....all they could say about why they liked Hillary was because she was "funny, and smart".

If we're the only one's here, though, does anyone else hear the tree fall?

Seriously...the libs are so tied to their normal news sources....can we really make a difference?

(sorry for the disjointedness of my post, Noel, I am really, really tired).

Blonde

B,

I'm not looking to preach to the choir, or the janitors. It's the people sitting in the pews that must be our focus. Therein lies the real hidden treasure.

Everybody is talking to the extremes. We need to be reaching out to the larger percentage of the electorate that is currently being ignored -- those that aren't so dug into their dogma that they can still listen to reason.

It's nice on that side of the pool, B. Come on in, the water's fine.  ns

This medium is just in its

This medium is just in its infancy...

I was gonna dispute your assertion (alas, pessimism), however, you make
the point there...still I'm compelled to convulse every time I think of
how the demonstrable treason of the MSM is magnified by their
concurrent salacious smut that subsequently represents America (as it
is nearly exclusively projected), and therefore raises doubts in the
minds of anyone who is constantly "informed" of the subtle Satan. After
all, if it walks like a duck, etc.

So perhaps this is a Brave New World. If so, I've gotta work on my PR. :0)

Amen!

Can't add to that one. Well said.

The only thing evil needs to

The only thing evil needs to flourish is for good men to do nothing.  Thankfully, this site does something important.  I believe some of your stories would never had made it to the media if it weren't for this site. 

Kudos   NB!

The left

One of the left's most serious problems is their inability to listen and learn. Their ideology trumps even common sense. I find this site quite educational. My very brief excursions to left-wing blogs demonstrated to me their immaturity, among other things. When the liberals invade here, it's always the same thing --sarcasm and ignorance of the world they live in. They are inexperienced and are being led by those who take advantage of their immaturity, (in the same manner as does the educational system). Keep up the good work, NB. I, for one, have gained great respect for most of the regulars on this site.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal