Tim Russert appeared on Wednesday’s Today to discuss the Libby verdict. Unsurprisingly, anchor Meredith Vieira asked her co-worker no tough questions about his controversial role in the case. The NBC duo underscored how historic and how damaging the verdict was, with Russert asserting it will "connect with people in a large way." Then, in the strangest line in the interview, after blowing Libby’s conviction into the Trial of the Century, when asked about the verdict Russert said he "took no joy in it."
On Wednesday, attorney Victoria Toensing wrote an article for National Review Online suggesting Russert’s pretense that he didn’t know what lawyers did was a good reason for appeal: "The court prevented the defense from impeaching Tim Russert: The NBC anchorman, who has a law degree, testified he did not know a lawyer could not accompany a witness before the grand jury. The defense then exhumed three clips where Russert had said on the air that a lawyer cannot go into the grand jury with his client. The judge would not allow the jury to hear that other honorable people sometimes forget or misspeak when being grilled on the witness stand."
There’s also the charge that Russert filed a false affidavit claiming it was wrong to disclose details of his conversations with Libby, but even The New York Times reported on February 8 that’s not what he told the FBI:
Mr. Russert had said in an affidavit that it was a matter of journalistic principle to refuse to divulge his conversation with Mr. Libby. But Mr. Wells, who also displayed this affidavit on-screen, noted that when Mr. Russert was first reached by telephone by an F.B.I. investigator, weeks before the affidavit, he spoke freely about it.
But NBC viewers only saw Russert in his comfort zone, attacking the Bush administration, and then suggesting Karl Rove and Richard Armitage should be fired for leaking Plame's role in assigning her husband to Niger. MRC's Geoff Dickens made the transcript:
Vieira: "NBC's Tim Russert was the key witness for the prosecution in the Libby case. Tim, good morning to you."
Tim Russert: "Good morning, Meredith."
Vieira: "Let's start with political fallout. Libby is highest-ranking government official to be convicted of a felony since Iran-Contra back in the Eighties. How damaging is this politically for the White House, do you think, Tim?"
Russert: "Well it is significant for the reasons you just mentioned. It's been more than 130 years since a sitting White House official had been indicted. So it is quite an extraordinary event in that regard. The President and the Vice President both have said they will remain quiet until the appeals have been processed. What you saw today, Meredith, conservative outlets like the National Review, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, all calling for the President to pardon Scooter Libby. That will be an issue front and center for this White House."
Vieira: "Meanwhile Senator Harry Reid is putting pressure on the President to, to say that he will never pardon Scooter Libby."
Russert: "Absolutely and you heard a whole chorus of Democrats saying that yesterday. The Democrats try to do two things, put political pressure on the White House to publicly state the President would not pardon Mr. Libby and two, to try to put the Iraq war on trial. Trying to broaden it beyond Mr. Libby's credibility."
Vieira: "Well how will this affect the President's ability to, to push his agenda in Iraq, this verdict?"
Russert: "Well you know when you have a trial like this it's very difficult to engage the country in the nuances because it is very complicated but this morning when the headlines scream all across the country: 'Former Chief of Staff to Vice President Cheney Convicted.' 'Guilty,' 'Perjury,' 'Obstruction of Justice.' My sense is that will connect with people in a, in a large way."
Vieira: "You know one of the jurors that you just heard Tim, he, he said that several of the jurors actually felt bad for Libby, they felt he was a fall guy for others including his former boss, the Vice President. During the trial prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said and I'm quoting here, 'There is a cloud over what the Vice President did.' And in today's New York Times, Republican strategist Scott Reed was quoted saying, quote, 'The trial has been death by 1,000 cuts for Cheney. It's hurt him inside the administration. It's hurt him with the Congress, it's hurt his stature around the world because it has shown a lot of the inner workings of the White House. It peeled the bark right off the way they operate.' Is this the beginning of the end, do you believe, for the Vice President?"
Russert: "Well what was interesting in listening to the juror because he expressed an interest that the jury had been listening, personally, to Mr. Cheney. There was a suggestion by the defense that Mr. Cheney would testify. That never materialized. The President is on record saying that if anyone leaked information like this they would be dealt with. It appears the jury believed that Mr. Cheney gave Mr. Libby the information. As Kelly reported Mr. Armitage, Mr. Rove shared information with reporters and so the President now has to, at some time, come to grips with that and recognize that having made a commitment to deal with it how will he do that?"
Vieira: "Tim you are used to reporting on stories, not being the story but you were a key witness, if not the star witness for the prosecution in this case. What was your reaction to the verdict?"
Russert: "Well I don't take any joy in it Meredith and this has been a very difficult and, and, period because it's not what I'm comfortable doing. But the facts are very simple. When someone accuses me of something that's untrue I have an obligation to respond and set the record straight. When I am ordered to testify under oath I have an obligation to tell the truth, which is what I did. The jurors were extraordinary, those who have talked publicly. They said, very straightforward, that when Mr. Libby said he was surprised to learn about Valerie Plame from me they simply did not believe him. Those are the jurors, those are the ones who had to make this decision, not me."
Vieira: "Relieved it's finally over?"
Russert: "Yeah I am. I really am. It's not what I want to do. I love reporting stories and focusing on the news and not being part of it."
Vieira: "Alright Tim, thanks very much."
Russert: "Thanks, Meredith."
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Of course you took no joy in
March 7, 2007 - 23:24 ET by BlazerOf course you took no joy in his conviction Tim. But I'll bet you enjoyed the all-you-can eat buffet at Golden Corral afterwards with your good buddy Dennis Collins.
If I wanted more fair, accurate, and patriotic reporting than what our MSM has to offer, I'd just tune in to Al-Jazeera.
Wouldn't it be great if somed
March 7, 2007 - 23:44 ET by MidAmericaWouldn't it be great if someday a President would have the nerve to stand up to these arrogant blowhards. The next time a govenrment secret is 'outed' the full force of the Justice Department should come down on the heads of these self serving weasels.
Bias
March 8, 2007 - 00:30 ET by KC MulvilleThe American public doesn't watch the news because we hope that reporters are smarter than we are. (We all know they aren't.) We listen to reporters because they claim to have sources, and access to inside information. It's crucial to remember that a reporter's only marketable commodity is his access to sources, but that all those sources are inherently biased themselves.
We need to remind ourselves (and fellow news consumers) that anything a reporter says is to be taken with a huge grain of salt. It isn't just that the reporters themselves have an agenda. Their sources have an agenda also.
Why does it suprise anyone th
March 8, 2007 - 00:56 ET by Right Wing Attack DogWhy does it suprise anyone that this gas bag would be any different from the rest of the clowns at his network? His game plan at this show trial cooked up by the D.C. leftists, was to cover his fat ass and hang anybody he could from the Bush administration. Whether Scooter was guilty or innocent was not a concern. With them, it is the seriousness of the charge, not the evidence that matters. The end result justifies what ever means are necessary.
Russert
March 8, 2007 - 05:40 ET by JNaughtThere is no doubt that if anyone at NBC News is beyond question, it is Tim Russert. Hardly a "gas bag".
JN--finish this sentence if y
March 8, 2007 - 07:10 ET by ncstevemJN--finish this sentence if you don't mind. I am politically liberal because....
Tim Russert
March 8, 2007 - 08:53 ET by ontherightJN - Your assertion that Tim Russert is "hardly a gas bag" is comical. One only has to read his words from his Today interview this morning;
"When someone accuses me of something that's untrue I have an obligation to respond and set the record straight." and "They (the jury) said, very straightforward, that when Mr. Libby said he was surprised to learn about Valerie Plame from me they simply did not
believe him."
But his testimony, as reported by his own MSM minions, Tim blamed faulty memory when asked if he may have given the information in question to Libby.
So which is it Tim? "...I set the record straight..." by telling the truth only when it's convenient, or I forget the facts when it comes to the "real" truth, in an effort to continue our (MSM) concerted effort(s) to bash Bush....hmmmm.
Typical liberal, do as I say, not as I do role model you have there JN.
Russert
March 8, 2007 - 09:32 ET by pbanks7Tim Russert . . . Hardly a "gas bag".
Neither was the Hindenberg. When anyone with his experience claims he didn't know you could not bring an attorney into a grand jury, he's a lying gasbag.
When he says he never told Scooter Libby "about Valerie Plame," was he parsing his words? I'll bet he was, but the defense was not allowed to cross-examine him, so we'll probably never know.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
Vieira: "Meanwhile Sen
March 8, 2007 - 06:33 ET by motherbeltVieira: "Meanwhile Senator Harry Reid is putting pressure on the President to, to say that he will never pardon Scooter Libby."
Russert: "Absolutely and you heard a whole chorus of Democrats saying that yesterday.
I wish the President would say very plainly "That is my decision to make; Senator Reid should mind his own business."
But he probably won't. Sigh......
Plamegate Russert Libby
March 8, 2007 - 09:24 ET by pbanks7Russert: "When someone accuses me of something that's untrue I have an obligation to respond and set the record straight."
Which the Bush Administration was trying to do when Kerry political campaign operative Joe Wilson lied: Cheney sent me, no yellowcake, they're persecuting me....
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
Russert
March 8, 2007 - 09:50 ET by iveseenitallRussert's a "gas bag", and a liar, and a hypocrite, and a liberal Democrat. All this makes him "objective" in his reporting.--- Riiight! I love it when he speaks for the "American people". What does that make the rest of us who don't believe him because he is such a lying hypocrite?
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal