Over on The Corner, Byron York is puzzled over why Libby's lawyers wouldn't choke on the many conflicts of blabby juror Denis Collins, the former Washington Post staffer who worked for Bob Woodward, partied with Walter Pincus, shared a back yard with Tim Russert, not to mention the book-writing about the CIA:
From the day Denis Collins appeared in jury selection, reporters asked themselves one question: How did this guy get on the jury? From his account at the Huffington Post, he recounts telling the court about his many, almost unbelievable, conflicts:
Judge [Reggie] Walton read the query sheet I'd marked earlier.
You know someone on the prospective witness list?
I do. Bob Woodward was my boss at the Washington Post for three or four years.
Would you tend to give his statements more credibility than the statements of other witnesses?I immediately picture a party Woodward hosted at his Georgetown home for the Metro staff about 25 years ago. When I went looking for my girl friend, I found her with some copy aides and reporters in an attic piled high with boxes of files for one of his books.
"Unbelievable," said one of the reporters. "Look at the file labels. This entire box is backup for one interview."
But not infallible. Didn't he write two different books about going to war in Iraq?
Know anyone else on the list?Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus. I don't think I ever spoke to him during my 10 years at the Post, but twice in the last 14 months we talked at parties thrown by a mutual friend.
Anyone else?
Until a year or so ago, Tim Russert was a neighbor. His back yard and mine shared an alley and a basketball hoop where our sons played. I attended a few neighborhood barbecues in his back yard.
Attorneys at both tables are suppressing "ain't this a small town" grins.
Do you know Judith Miller?
No. And yet. I remember a scathing column about Miller in the New York Times and volunteer that I went to grade school with its author, Maureen Dowd. (Maureen had a crush on my brother Kevin. Her older brother Kevin was something of a hero to my youngest brother Brendan after he showed up to coach his grade school football team one Saturday morning in a convertible, with a gorgeous woman in a black cocktail dress in the front seat, and what appeared to be an empty bottle of champagne on the floor. They'd obviously been up all night. He obviously had game.)
I'm not eager to be on any jury for a six week trial, especially with a recently published novel to pimp. But the suggestion that I might lay down for a fellow journalist is starting to irritate. I had to work too hard to become a reporter. Started in the basement of the Washington Post pushing 400 pound rolls of paper to the presses, blah, blah, blah.
"From where you sit I'd be skeptical too," I tell them. "But I've also heard good things about Mr. Libby." Pregnant pause. "A friend who played in a 40 and older touch football league with him says he has a good arm."
Actual snickering.
One of the lawyers asks me the subject of my 2005 non-fiction book.
"Spying.""You wrote about the CIA?"
"I did." The perfect storm.
Yet here I am.
It seems there would have been a good case for the judge to summarily strike him from the jury pool. But even so, why did the defense allow him on the jury? The only answer, it appears, is that Libby's lawyers believed other candidates from the DC jurors pool might be worse.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Was writing for PuffHo supp
March 7, 2007 - 17:54 ET by FairlightWas writing for PuffHo supposed to solidify his credibility? He might as well write the appeal himself.
A change of venue, say Wyomin
March 7, 2007 - 17:59 ET by upcountrywaterA change of venue, say Wyoming or sumthing?
Tim,I heard today on Rush tha
March 7, 2007 - 18:08 ET by bigtimerTim,
I heard today on Rush that the defense did not have any strikes left, they had to take him...he also said that you couldn't believe all the people like moveon. that were let go....so I guess they had no choice. (I do not know if the Judge could do it himself...if he could, of course he should of.)
I have been wondering the same thing, as I posted yesterday.
This guy is maddening...seems the more he opens his mouth, the more opportunity for Libby.
My heart really goes out to him and those who love him.
This whole ordeal is outrageous....so is Fitzmas.
You should love this guy, e
March 7, 2007 - 18:13 ET by sarcasmoYou should love this guy, every time he opens his mouth, as you implied, it helps Libby's appeal! And it looks like he wants to write a book!!
JMR
Exactly, so now we waited wit
March 8, 2007 - 16:50 ET by dscottExactly, so now we waited with bated breath on Libby's filing of an appeal.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
The only answer, it appears,
March 7, 2007 - 18:10 ET by Dave RThe only answer, it appears, is that Libby's lawyers believed other candidates from the DC jurors pool might be worse.
Tim, that's scary. I think Libby's lawyers did him a huge disservice, first by not asking for a change of venue, and secondly by not weeding all the "journalist's" from the list, particularly one living right next to Tim Russert! If I were Scooter, I'd be more than a little miffed right about now. So much so that I would be looking elsewhere for representation for the appeal we all know is coming.
When this Collins guy made a point yesterday to say that the politics of the jurors never came into play, my first thought was that he was lying. Now I am even more convinced that he was.
Do any of you believe it is even remotely possible these people spent that much time kooped up together, and not one of them uttered anything political?
Somehow I seriously doubt it.
Ok, how was Libby supposed to
March 7, 2007 - 18:13 ET by AtheistRepublicanOk, how was Libby supposed to get a fair trial in... D.C? Please, someone explain to me how that would be possible in the most Liberal city in America? He better get a retrial, its only fair.
AtheistRepublican,I made that
March 7, 2007 - 20:47 ET by msh1973AtheistRepublican,
I made that very comment this morning on another thread. Rush said today that the only thing Libby was quilty of was being a Republican.
Can you say, "conflict
March 7, 2007 - 18:25 ET by Tim the EnchanterCan you say, "conflict of interest?"
Collins says the jury belie
March 7, 2007 - 18:43 ET by Right2thePointCollins says the jury believed the Cheney notes in the article margin which Libby saw was instrumental in the conviction.
Only trouble is there was no testimony supporting this concept.
The article was only allowed to enter as "state of mind" evidence and the jury was cautioned to disregard the actual article.
Collins in the time after 2
March 7, 2007 - 18:45 ET by Right2thePointCollins in the time after 2pm seems to be all over giving interviews and manages to make a HuffPo 7 page post.
Must be a good multitasker I guess.
Knowledge will forever govern
March 7, 2007 - 20:44 ET by WoodysviewKnowledge will forever govern ignorance -- Madison
So, Libby is guilty of lying to cover up a crime that didn’t happen. I have lived way too long.
Had he said “I don’t recall” like Hillary and other Clinton administration people did, hundreds of times, there would have been no perjury.
If his name was Sandy Burger, he could have admitted to lying to government people and destroying classified documents and absolutely nothing would have happened.
Once again we are witness to crimes by the third major political party in this country. The media, that was intended to be a watchdog on the leaders of this country has instead become our strongest political party with, unfortunately, a destroy America agenda.
Woodysview...your points are
March 7, 2007 - 21:41 ET by Cape ConservativeWoodysview...your points are well made! We can only hope that each and every mainstream media company will soon be experiencing the lack of interest that has led to major layoffs at the NYT and Time. What really frightens me is knowing that some people listen ONLY to the evening news or Today or GMA shows and base their opinions on the swill offered continuously by this "third party" with, YES, a destroy America agenda!