Newsweek's Howard Fineman Greenlights Democratic Attack Ads

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.

During live coverage of the Lewis Libby verdict on MSNBC, Newsweek's Howard Fineman greenlit this potential line of attack for the Democrats: "If you're the Democrats you go up immediately with ads. You talk about lying. You use the word, 'lying' with reference to this administration and you can do it because there is a conviction in a court of law." Fineman also tied the mistreatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reed Hospital to the Libby verdict as he claimed: "The war in Iraq has now been bracketed on both sides politically. The Walter Reed story is about the human consequences of the war, the Scooter Libby trial was about how we got into the war and whether somebody was lying..."

The following exchange occurred at 12:31pm on MSNBC:

Chris Jansing: "And it's always a complicated case in a situation like this because there are legal implications here. There are legal considerations but also very important political considerations that are going into all of what happens next. Howard Fineman with Newsweek is back on the phone with us. I want to get your reaction, Howard, and what would you expect to hear at the White House briefing, which was supposed to start a couple of minutes ago."

Howard Fineman: "Well they, they have got some 'splaining to do here. I think this is a stunning verdict and politically potent because as I was saying before the verdict was rendered, the war in Iraq has now been bracketed on both sides politically. The Walter Reed story is about the human consequences of the war, the Scooter Libby trial was about how we got into the war and whether somebody was lying not only in talking to the authorities but also about the evidence that got us to the war to begin with. And as Chris Matthews was saying earlier the heat, politically, now is really on Vice President Dick Cheney. He was the master salesman of the war and Scooter Libby was his field representative, his man in the field selling it in the media. Why was Dick Cheney so vehement, so frantic about questions being raised on the Niger issue. The question of how those 16 famous words got into President Bush's State of the Union speech. If you're the Democrats you go up immediately with ads. You talk about lying. You use the word, 'lying' with reference to this administration and you can do it because there is a conviction in a court of law. I think it's enormously powerful politically, as I say, to bracket the war both its beginning and its end and that's where, where the conversation is gonna head now."

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Did the "Duke Univ.&quot

Did the "Duke Univ." prosecutor get another Job  ?  

Obviously, the new Democratic Majority flows over into the Courts, where the "Law" is on the back burner, and making political statements is the purpose of the Courts......at least in the DC area.  

The pool of DC Jurors is suspect, and when a New York Post Journalist gets on the Libby Jury, one wonders about "Fair and Balanced".   The Trial sorta went like the Congressional committees, dominated by Dems, chaired by the Majority......Now we have trials in DC by the Majority, verdicts by the Majority, and Political spinning on TV by the Liberal TV Majority. 

The American people outside of DC will NOT be fooled.  This will be received outside of DC, like the OJ trial was received outside of California.....Justice was not served, and let the spinning begin.

At Times like these, it becomes more than just a Moral Obligation to express ones opinion, it becomes a Pleasure.

Now if the Democrats would no

Now if the Democrats would now finally begin prosecuting Sandy Berger and William Jefferson.... Ooops, they're democrats too. Sorry about that liberals! Wouldn't want to paint your party as corrupt. If the Democrats are really concerned for the rule of law and purjury being a no-no, why did they do their best to protect the perjurer-in-chief Bill Clinton and smear Ken Starr????

Sandy Berger was charged with

Sandy Berger was charged with a misdemeanor and fined $10,000. Jefferson is still under investigation with trial pending. Read a newspaper once and a while.

Tip: You'll find these storie

Tip: You'll find these stories (and more like them) in Section  Z,  Pages 75 & 76, between the cricket scores and used toilets for sale.

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

(lol)

(lol)

Well excuse me, but arent t

Well excuse me, but arent the democrats in charge of funding for the VA now?

What the hell happened Nancy?

From the Kansas City Star:

From the Kansas City Star:

After an increase sought for next year, the Bush budget would turn current trends on their head. Even though the cost of providing medical care to veterans has been growing rapidly — by more than 10 percent in many years — White House budget documents assume consecutive cutbacks in 2009 and 2010 and a freeze thereafter.

The proposed cuts are at odds with recent VA budget trends — its medical care budget has risen every year for two decades and 83 percent in the six years since Bush took office — sowing suspicion that the White House is making them up to make its long-term deficit figures look better.

“Either the administration is willingly proposing massive cuts in VA health care,” said Rep. Chet Edwards, a Texas Democrat, chairman of the panel overseeing the VA’s budget, “or its promise of a balanced budget by 2012 is based on completely unrealistic assumptions.”

ATTENTION DEMOCRATS:Here are

ATTENTION DEMOCRATS:

Here are your talking points.  We will dutifully report and amplify any and all press releases.

                        H. F.

These guys are Describing Dic

These guys are Describing Dick Cheney as "Frantic" ? ? HAhahaaa, that's funny.  The man is anything but that. 

And the Dots they are trying to connect, Reason for the Iraq war, and the Libby Trial, one can't even laugh at the reasoning of that, it just plain stupid. 

Are these guys THAT Desperate for something in the news to hide Pelosi's lack of performance ? 

Sounds like a Trial for Sandy Bergerpants should be put on the front Burner.    

At Times like these, it becomes more than just a Moral Obligation to express ones opinion, it becomes a Pleasure.

Fineman

Mr. Fineman has a good point. Once again the GOP has left itself wide open. Many of us older Republicans were scratching our heads when the Libby defense charged that he was just a fall guy and then refused to put him on the stand. What were they thinking? It reminds one of the dark days of Watergate. That combined with the horrors of Walter Reed can make us only shake our heads and wonder "What next???"

 That's funny, I'm an old en

 That's funny, I'm an old enough Republican to have seen Watergate firsthand and this reminds me of Monicagate, not Watergate. It's about lying under oath.

 

Howard, if they take your adv

Howard, if they take your advice and run attack ads talking about all the lying, won't some people get confused and think they're talking about the Clinton administration (past or prospective)?