We'll see how the electorate decides, but there's no doubt who won the "Today" show primaries this morning. For the Dems, it was Barack, and among Republicans, Rudy.Narrating the segment on the political duel between Obama and Hillary in Selma, Alabama this weekend, Andrea Mitchell portrayed Obama as having authentic appeal, while picturing Hillary resorting to heavy-handed political tactics.
Consider Mitchell's opening line: "On the 42nd anniversary of Bloody Sunday, the historic clash over voting rights in Selma, Alabama, Barack Obama was supposed to be the main attraction,
until Hillary Clinton, slipping in the polls to Obama among African-Americans, decided to come." Translation: a sinking Hillary tries to steal Barack's limelight. Not very flattering.As Mitchell mentioned that Hillary had brought Bill because of his "enormous popularity with black voters," a clip rolled of a woman literally squealing in excitement and delight as Bill walked by in the parade. But doesn't that highlight Hillary's relative weakness as much as Bill's strength?
After stating that "Obama answered critics who say his mixed ancestry makes him not black enough," Mitchell rolled a clip of Obama speaking in a preacher's cadence as he told a church gathering: "don't tell me I'm not coming home when I come to Selma, Alabama. I'm here because somebody walked."
Compare and contrast Obama's strong -- versus Hillary's screeching -- pulpit performances here.
Mitchell, after noting that Obama's crowds were "much larger" than Clinton's when both spoke at black churches, then ran a clip of Jeh [sic] Johnson, whom the graphic described as a "former Clinton official and Barack Obama supporter." He predicted that there would be a "steady shift" from Clinton to Obama.
If things were already bad for Hillary, they began to get -- a lot -- worse. A clip of Hillary speaking in a church followed and the contrast with Obama's natural flair was painfully apparent. By her angry, grating tone you might have thought she was condemning Halliburton rather than talking about taking back the future.
Mitchell then declared that "the Clintons are fighting back." She stated that Cong. John Lewis, an icon of the civil rights movement, had been on the verge of endorsing Obama until he got a last-minute call from Bill Clinton getting him to hold off. Lewis was shown, stating "when I get a call from my friends, whether it's the president or the former president, I don't tend to disclose the nature of the call." Translation: yup, they muscled me.
Continued Andrea: "the competition is even rougher over money. The Clintons are telling Democrats to ante-up now, to increase her early fundraising advantage." Added Mitchell: "Clinton campaign manager Terry McAuliffe even joked, 'you're either with us or against us.'" Some joke. Shades of Pres. Bush warning countries regarding the war on terrorism.
Mitchell concluded with an assessment one can imagine had Hillary screaming for -- or at -- senior aide Howard Wolfson this morning: "Hillary Clinton had hoped to build her run for the nomination around the percepton that she is the inevitable candidate. Now that is not at all that clear." As bad as the segment was for Hillary, it could have been worse. Mitchell didn't make mention of the phony southern accent that Hillary laid on during her Selma visit. H/t reader motherbelt via Drudge.
When Chris Matthews was brought in, he seconded the notion that Obama is the candidate with the Big Mo, predicting Barack would catch Hillary in the polls by Memorial Day. He pointedly observed: "Robert Kennedy did not have to remind anybody that he was John's brother. Hillary has to keep reminding people for some reason that she's Bill's wife, and I think that could become a problem. Sooner or later she's going to have to lose the training wheels and ride on her own." Ouch.
Turning to the GOP side, Matthews described himself as "the least surprised" by Rudy's big lead in the polls. As the graphic indicated, Chris sees Rudy in charge. "I've been saying for years now Rudy is the toughest guy to beat. Because Republicans are the John Wayne party. They're different from the Democrats. They want a strong, tough, sometimes pushy [candidate]. They want a guy who's so strong . Someone you're afraid of. Rudy makes that standard. Rudy is a very strong candidate because Republicans want a leader to replace George Bush."
Then, talk about a smell test! When Meredith Vieira asked what Giuliani brings to the table in addition to his strong 9-11 performance, Matthews responded: "he cleaned up New York so you could walk in the subways without smelling urine. He cleaned it up so you could bring your kids around the streets at night. He made the city safe and clean -- and smell better. It was extraordinary what he did in that city." Chris definitely has odor removal on his mind. Should we start calling Rudy "Tidy Cat"?
Matthews, discounting the significance of Rudy's reputation for not being a nice guy, and of his messy personal and marital life, continued: "Republicans want very strong rule. And compared to the other guys running against him, Rudy is a guy with street cred, because he was there on the front lines of 9-11." [Think what you will of McCain but I'd say 5 years as a POW gives him some street cred, too]. Noting that crimes rates are going up in big East Coast cities, Matthews added "Rudy can hit the crime button in a way these other guys can't."
Vieira raised the story that emerged over the weekend of Rudy's son Andrew stating that while his father might make a great president, "I get my values from my mom," and that he had a strained, distant relationship with his father. She asked how the story would sit "with these conservative Christians?" [Which conservative Christians, Meredith? Matthews had never mentioned them.]
Matthews was in a forgiving mood: "nobody likes that kind of talk, but the fact is that we have a country under danger of another attack of terrorism. It could come any time, it could come three months from now, three years from now, three decades from now. But people want a guy on the street corner. You know, when you're riding a subway in the middle of the night you want a tough cop in that train. And that's Rudy's strength. He has a lot of weaknesses, but that's his strength."
ABC Update: Over at Good Morning America, Jake Tapper narrated a segment on the dueling Selma appearances of Hillary and Obama. On the one hand, he ran a clip of Hillary in the pulpit speaking in much more natural, less grating, tones than the ones on display in the "Today" segment. On the other, GMA had edited together a clip revealing the numerous times that Hillary during her remarks made reference to "my husband." Tapper also reported on facts embarrassing to both candidates. Observing that Hillary had been raised in Illinois, he mentioned that she "adopted a curious southern drawl during her speech to the Alabama crowd." Tapper also pointed out that Obama at one point over the weekend claimed that the 1965 Selma march had paved the way for his parents to meet and fall in love. Only problem -- Obama was born in 1961.
Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Ohnigosh, did you hear the
March 5, 2007 - 10:02 ET by motherbeltOhnigosh, did you hear the audio of Hillary talking like a hick redneck? Nvermind phony, is that insulting to her audience or what? Not only the accent, but "from where I come from!"???? Oh, please.
LMAO! She just doesn't get it. She really thinks she is "gettin down" with the "real folks."
Reminded me of that famous "60 Minutes" interview when she adopted the drawl and said "We-ell He-eck, the-en, don't vote for 'im."
Thanks for reminding me abo
March 5, 2007 - 10:11 ET by Mark FinkelsteinThanks for reminding me about Hillary's phony southern accent. I did listen to that via Drudge, and will add a mention of it to this item.
Mark, I busted up laughing wh
March 5, 2007 - 13:02 ET by Chris NormanMark,
I busted up laughing when Drudge played those bites of "Miss Hillary" doin' her bay-est to sound lahk a Southerner. I did think, though, Drudge was off the mark in focusing on Giuliani's joke that he sometimes "disagrees with himself". I mean, come on, it was a joke and Drudge was reading way too much into it. Something tells me he's not a Rudy fan...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Mark, that clip shows Hilla
March 5, 2007 - 18:03 ET by motherbeltMark, that clip shows Hillary's screech, but the better one is the one linked on Drudge that starts "Ah don't fee-el no ways tired"...I can't believe she did it with a straight face. Any sountherner should be completely insulted by her condescension and patronization. Here is the link to the Breitbart audio:
http://www.ifilm.com/profile/breitbart/video/2829104
Reminds me of Al Gore channel
March 5, 2007 - 11:10 ET by NewsbusterbrownReminds me of Al Gore channelling the spirit of an African-American preacher a few years back.
The first primaries are almos
March 5, 2007 - 10:04 ET by midnight cowboyThe first primaries are almost a year away, the press wants to make this a horse race so they have something to report in the course of a year. I don't doubt for a second that as the first primaries come close the left wing media will all jump on thunder thighs's band wagon, unless some major politcal catastrophe erupts in that time. As far as Rudy they are just propping him up now so they can try to flatten him later. They will go into the deep red districts pound away at his social views, find a few who don't like him and portray it as that's how they all think in those areas to cast doubt on him. The problem is "Rudy don't play that game", if he counter punches the way he did as mayor, he will rise even higher in the polls.
Sidebar: That screenshot of Hillary, looks like she's moderating a game of "Simon Sez" which seems somewhat appropriate for how she operates.
Appears that Obamination ha
March 5, 2007 - 10:41 ET by John in CAAppears that Obamination has a time warp problem similar to Bill Clinton's riding on the bus and giving up his seat on a bus in support of Rosa Parks. From Michelle Malkin
[...] But even more noteworthy: Obama's truth-stretching speech the same day. Allah caught two truthy assertions by The Messiah:
1) His claim that a Kennedy-sponsored airlift in Africa was responsible for bringing the Obama family to the U.S.
2) His claim that events in Selma led to his parents getting together--and Obama being born.
Allah questions the timing.
1) JFK didn't take office until two years after Obama's arrived in the U.S.
2) Obama, Jr., was born four years before Bloody Sunday in Selma.
Give a Democrat Party free America a chance!
Rudy
March 5, 2007 - 10:52 ET by iveseenitallLooks like Rudy vs. the Demo. But there's a long way to go. If he gets the nomination, the election will represent the divided nation we are. Strong on terrorism vs. weak-kneed liberalism, strong on the economy vs. weak-kneed socialism, the survival of the middle class vs. the welfare state. The choice couldn't be more clear.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
Only an under-educated dimwit
March 5, 2007 - 11:59 ET by mattmOnly an under-educated dimwit could fail to see the shallowness, phoniness and lack of qualifications among the DemocRAT field.
Sadly, there are alot of under-educated dimwits waiting for The Oprah-ized MSM to tell them who to vote for.
I think Obama's going to get
March 5, 2007 - 12:16 ET by BruzillaI think Obama's going to get the nomination. Leading Dems can speak all the flowery language about Hillary they want, but these folks aren't stupid enough to think she can win. Forget the cankles, Hillary's got a ton of baggage (both Bill's and her's) and she can't win. We saw the same scenario with Howard Dean before the 2004 election... all the agitators and folks who love to see their name in print were all pushing Dean to the head of the line, but when actual voters had to make their pick they didn't want to have anything to do with Dean. It'll be the same with Clinton.
I don't see Obama winning the general, but at least the Dems can put up a nominee who is worth voting for rather than a retread.
I listened to Hillary Clinton
March 5, 2007 - 13:07 ET by GalvanicI listened to Hillary Clinton's entire speech on C-Span radio, so I didn't get to observe the gestures she may have been making. But the voice-only delivery was revealing enough. Some observations:
1. Her speech was obviously scripted to mimic a traditional black civil rights speech, with the mixture of Biblical reference and rhytmic repetition of theme (In this case, "We Have a March to Finish" -- or words to that effect.). She stopped just short of the Jesse-Jackson-style and gospel-like Call-&-Response method, which may have come across as too far a stretch, even for the wife of the First Black President.
2. Hillary spent what seemed like at least 5 minutes praising SLCC leaders past and present, her 'good friend' Congressman John Lewis (a Selma March veteran), and others. Then somewhere into her speech, she began injecting the word "we", but not just in a We're In It Together sense --- it was almost as if she was painting an image of Hillary being spiritually if not physically alongside the Selma marchers ever since Bloody Sunday 42 years ago.
3. She acknowledged that Selma and MLK made Obama's candidacy possible, but it also made HERS possible, making the usual feminist error of tying radical feminsism to the Civil Rights Movement.
4. Her voice rising to a crescendo to work up the crowd, came across as a bit too forced. It didn't sound like she truly felt it inside, but then maybe my prejudice is showing.
If I were a reporter at the event, I would have asked Ms. Clinton why, of all the US Senators, she chose as the subject of her undergraduate thesis, to attack the first black Senator of the US -- Edward Brookes of Massachusetts.
Galv,Sad, isn't it, that a gr
March 5, 2007 - 13:16 ET by Chris NormanGalv,
Sad, isn't it, that a group of people, who are still so desperate for coddling, will latch onto any charlatan and race monger who will pander (badly) to them. The whole thing was train wreck of embarassment, or it would be if more people saw it for what it really was...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Agree
March 5, 2007 - 13:49 ET by iveseenitallI agree, Chris. It's hard to understand why more people don't get how insulting this pandering is. Hillary with whatever that "accent" was and Hussein with the "I'm one of you, ya'all" routine were embarrassing and insulting to anyone with a brain. I'm surprised some conservative black commentator doesn't pick up on it.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
I agree, too, Chris. Here's
March 5, 2007 - 16:52 ET by GalvanicI agree, too, Chris. Here's an ambitious woman who's emerged as a major political figure merely by suffering through her rocky marriage to Slick Willie long enough to gain name recognition. That so many choose not to see through her blind ambition, her lies, and her disingenuity, is indeed discourgaging.
Galv & isia, It's the sam
March 5, 2007 - 18:28 ET by Chris NormanGalv & isia,
It's the same groups who worry more about having a street named after some civil rights leader than the fact that members of their race are being killed by drugs and crime. It's all about symbols and pandering...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Shrillery's speech was truly
March 5, 2007 - 18:24 ET by Trix RabbitShrillery's speech was truly repulsive and an insult. If any of the Republican candidates had spoken in that phony minstrel show/stepin fechit routine they would have been crucified.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell