Ann Coulter Hunts Liberals and Media at CPAC

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

It seems likely given the focus the media gave Ann Coulter's remark about John Edwards that most NewsBusters readers know the controversial, never at a loss for words writer spoke at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., this past Friday.

For those that couldn't attend, our friend Ms Underestimated has the videos of Ann's speech and Q&A session here and here.

The comment getting all the media focus is about halfway through the first segment. However, do stick around for the Q&A, for in a lot of respects, it's actually better than her prepared speech.

Have fun.

FYI: Ms U also has a video of Duncan Hunter's words at the conference here.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oh Noel,Thank you!For those t

Oh Noel,

Thank you!

For those that haven't seen the whole thing, and have time on a Saturday afternoon, it is well worth it!

Btw...I have checked on and off and C-Span is not re-airing it like I thought they would today, maybe later, all I know is the will re-air some leftist march on the mall or Tavis Smiley show over and over until you want to scream if you are trying to catch some other hearing or show you may have missed.

So thanks again Noel!.

BT

BT,

My pleasure. I figured most people probably hadn't seen this entire speech. As usual, the media only focused on one sentence.

Of course, there's plenty of other remarks in here to incite liberal ire!  ns

Noel,You got that right!Watch

Noel,

You got that right!

Watch it those of you on the left!

You will adore it!

I already know the right will.

Comments ought to be rich....lol!

Noel, I see you added the Hun

Noel,

I see you added the Hunter video too today...another great big thanks...I really enjoyed listening to every word of it!

Much appreciated.

Thompson/Hunter...

I can dream....

Well, I can certainly see w

Well, I can certainly see why the Libs have their bloomers in a wad. It's OK to call people Nazis and murderers, but "faggot" is beyond the pale. Tell me, if being homosexual is OK, then why is "faggot", considered an insult? Plenty of "gay" people call themselves "queer", which used to be a derogatory term. Now it's fashionable, as in "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy."

Anyway, when are the Democrats going to quit calling for the entire Republican establishment to denounce and disavow and condemn every single sentence by any conservative anywhere, that they find "offensive"? How about calling on all the Democrat candidates to denounce "Democratic Underground", one of the most vicious websites anywhere? I'm sure they will say that they can't be responsible for everyone; but they expect Republican leaders take responsibility for everything they don't like.

Link is gone but in 2004, w

Link is gone but in 2004, while campaigning, Edwards said he opposed gay marriage. He was not on their side then nor does he desire to be associated with them today.

Obviously he is not able to attack Coulter's children.

JDW

Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

Here's a perfect opportunit

Here's a perfect opportunity for the Democrats to show what they're made of. Some prominent Republican should call on every Democratic candidate to denounce Bill Maher for saying  Arianna Huffington should have left on her website the comments saying that it was too bad the bomb missed VP Dick Cheney. Is "faggot" worse than wishing someone dead?

And of course, this will get

And of course, this will get 100 times more coverage than  Rosie O'Donnell's  "ching-chong! ching-chong!" Chinese slur,  or Senator Biden's "Ya know ya just can't walk into a 7-11 anymore without being an Indian.",  or Michael Richards:  "A  n gger! Look there's a n gger!!" or of course, Hillary's famous:  "F'ing Jew Bas____!!" Statements by celebrities and liberal politicians completely ignored or quickly swept under the rug by the MSM.  Maybe Ann should ironicly claim it was all just "a botched joke".

You left one out-Democrat Par

You left one out-Democrat Party senior statesman Robert Byrd using the "N" word on live network television a few years back. He got a pass, of course...

And if I'm not mistaken, af

And if I'm not mistaken, after he said it, instead of backtracking or apologizing, he said Yes, I'm going to use that word. Or something similar, making it plain that he meant it and wasn't retracting it.

Robert "KKK" Byrd of West by God Virginia

That would be Robert "KKK" Byrd you are referring to Del?

Q&A Says More on Homosexuals

Coulter may have used the word 'faggot' but she does point out in the Q&A, "Well, screw you. I'm not anti-gay".

"We're against gay marriage.  I don't want gays to be discriminated against...In addtion to blacks, I don't know why all gays aren't Republicans.  I think we have the pro-gay position, which is anti-crime and is for tax cuts.  Gays make a lot of money and they're victims of crime...They should be with us."

PD...Exactly!People need to l

PD...

Exactly!

People need to listen to the whole thing.

Listen.

Well as long as she said she'

Well as long as she said she's not anti-gay, that makes it OK then...

boa..Just curious, have you l

boa..

Just curious, have you listened to this?

I will leave that up to PD to answer your question....you just can't help yourself can ya?

LOL!

You guys think Maher's commen

You guys think Maher's comment was advocated for Cheney's death. The left will see Coulter's as just another example of her nonsense. It's a stalemate!

P.S. I'm gonna listen to it now...but I'm afraid it will suck the lifeforce out of me, keeping Ann perpetually young for eternity.

So we can officially add CDS

So we can officially add CDS (Coulter Derangement Syndrome) alongside of ODS (O'Reilly Derangement Syndrome) to the list of Balboa's ailments. I could probably safely assume that Bal suffers, ultimately, from ECDS (Every-Conservative Derangement Syndrome).

More like PDS (pundit derange

More like PDS (pundit derangement syndrome).

I actually thought some of Annie's lines were very funny. But just as you guys don't like Stewart for the smarm factor, same with Ann.

Well, thankfully, John Stewar

Well, thankfully, John Stewart repulses you as much as BoR and Coulter. Whew.

For a second there, I was worried you weren't being consistent.

Stewart's not a pundit.

Stewart's not a pundit.

Balboa

B,

Neither is O'Reilly.  ns

Noel

Very true. He's just a gasbag. :-)

Dude, you're getting spanked

Dude, you're getting spanked at will on this thread today. You came to this gunfight armed with a can opener. Call it a day, Bal.

"getting spanked"? It's just

"getting spanked"?

It's just a conversation. We're not keeping score.

I thought we were debating. M

I thought we were debating. My mistake.

We are. But I don't think any

We are. But I don't think anyone's "spanking" me.

Of course you don't, Bal.Shee

Of course you don't, Bal.

Sheesh.  Laughing.

Sneezing.

Sneezing.

Sorry, Bal.Not your style at

Sorry, Bal.

Not your style at all.

BTW...reading the new Hiaasen book...Nature Girl....verdict is still out.

Nature Girl...I dunno. I like

Nature Girl...I dunno. I liked some of the characters, but...seemed fragmented somehow. Still enjoyed reading it.

You said were weren't having

You said were weren't having a debate, now you say we are?

Make up your mind.

But then again, Stewart is an

But then again, Stewart is an ASSHOLE, and he's very good at  it too.  :-)

Why is it that EVERYTIME a liberal opens their mouth, I feel a sudden urge to hand them a roll of toilet paper?

What do you consider O'Reil

What do you consider O'Reilly to be if not a pundit? And for the sake of your credibility, I hope you don't say journalist.

If it wasn't for O'Reilly,

If it wasn't for O'Reilly, who would watch out for the "folks"? He may not be a "Journalist" but he is at least "journalish".

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

balbozo...

You've spent so much time sweeping up bu!!sh!t for liberals and calling it Ice Cream that you are beginning to believe it yourself...Stewart not a pundit...try that somewhere else...you know...like at Huffington where you libs swallow that dung whole.

Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

Balboa

B,

Um, do you really think that making a disparaging remark about a presidential candidate -- even a homophobic one -- is akin to advocating the death of a sitting Vice President? Really?

Yikes.  ns

It's not the same thing, no.

It's not the same thing, no. But it doesn't let Ann off the hook, either.

Balboa

B,

I'm not letting Ann off the hook. I think it was a silly comment on her part. However, it's not even close to the same level of virulence expressed by Maher. Yet, there is still not one media outlet that has covered Maher's remarks. Not one.  ns

Noel

I'd have to watch Maher's video to tell you. Ann's was a comment made to get attention, to be "edgy." Plus when you use an actual derogatory statement, it tends to attract more attention. And Maher's was not an outright statement, "I wish Cheney were dead."

So, you have been commenting

So, you have been commenting and defending Maher's comments, even though you never bothered to watch the video first?

Bal, Bal, Bal. This is how people lose credibility. We all know you are a water-carrier. At least try to put a little effort into it, will you please?

Sorry, sorry. BTW, that site

Sorry, sorry. BTW, that site isn't working right now.

And I did _read_ the comments, but will watch the video as soon as the site comes back up.

Are you serious, are you stil

Are you serious, are you still on dial up?

Did I say I was on dial-up?

Did I say I was on dial-up?

The site wouldn't come up when I tried.

The proper answer would be ,

The proper answer would be ,  Yes i have wide band ,yea i saw it. But noooo.. Waiting waiting,   Did you see the video, Yet  ????

OK, I saw the video of Maher.

OK, I saw the video of Maher. He doesn't seem to be saying he wants Cheney to die or that he wishes Cheney had died. He's stating what he believes to be true: Cheney dies, more people live.

This has taken you this long

This has taken you this long to watch the video and come up with a typical boa answer...

Priceless!

LMAO!

Glad I could help ya' out the

Glad I could help ya' out there.

Watch the video. He's not advocating Cheney's death. He's saying that if Cheney had died, fewer soldiers would die.

boa, Say hi to mespe or whate

boa,

Say hi to mespe or whatever the new left wing troll's name is and discuss it...he agrees with you.

We have already been there and done that, as you well know since you have been here most of the day too, and let yourself in on the conversation without even watching the video until now...oh puhleeeze...you are so typical.

he hates cheney

The basis for his opinion is simple. It's not relevant at all. He merely hates the VP.

More or less resulting dead men do not relate directly to Cheney. But to youz idiots, Cheney is Count Dracula. Go figure.

Waiting for dial -up to load!

Waiting for dial -up to load!

balbozo...the eternal apologist for libs

balbozo...it appears you'll stoop as low as possible to offer excuses and apologies for liberals, the only thing new here is how low you are willing to go. Next!

Shut up and blog! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

Balboa

B,

Then watch the video. I've seen them both, and, therefore, am qualified to render an opinion. By contrast, if you haven't, you are -- excuse me -- pulling opinions out of your ###. :-)  ns

One World, two Americas

Seeing how I've quit responding to trolls, I hope you don't mind if I channel my reply through responding to your comment Noel.Your point was well taken Noel.

Back to Coulter's comment - the point of Ann's comment is that if someone calls a pretty boy like Edwards a "faggot", our bizzaro world demands that person (particularly a conservative person) seek therapy.  However, using the Ditzy's Maines as an opposite example, if a person (particularly a liberal person) calls a wartime President like Bush a "dumb f**k" our bizzaro world demands they get 5 grammys.

Ironic that it would take a conservative woman to explain what Edwards two Americas is really all about.

One of my favorite things abo

One of my favorite things about Ann is that she knows exactly how to separate the men from the boys when it comes to conservatives. Watch out for some from our side with weak knees bring out the knives. There are those on the right who seek affirmation from the left by attacking their own.

Please see examples above and

Please see examples above and below on this thread.

Ann won't care, and she won

That's right, Attack Dog, Ann won't care, and she won't shut up. When she said in an article printed in National Review that we should invade Muslim countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity (it was hyperbole, but taken as a straight line), she got fired after the brouhaha. Did she pipe down? Nope, she called the NR editors a bunch of "girlie boys".

If the grandstanding Repubs disown her, they'll just prove that she's more of a man than they are.

Good point MB

The irony of your quote was that, as you stated it was hyperbole, and we all know that Chrisitans Don't do that, but MUSLIMS DO!!

Of course the Left never saw the irony as they wailed away at how Ann could say such a vile thing or suggest that we do it. All the while the left is doing whatever they can to preserve the right of Muslim Countries to kill, oppress and keep their people living in the dark ages and all the while blame the US for it!!

It's amazing.

I do think it's a bit sad though that someone has to say the shocking things Ann says in order for people to listen. She realizes that what she has to say needs to get out there and the MSM will NEVER let most of what she says see any airtime. So Ann has to drop a few bombs and then discerning people will read her books and articles and realize that what she says makes sense.

Liberals in the meantime, will not listen to her at all but just take quotes out of context and express outrage and demand that she be censored.

this is a superb post

Bravo, exLib,

You are shhhpot on.

I usually like Ann because sh

I usually like Ann because she has the ability to get under the Libs skin.  Knowing her it probablywasn't an accident or something that was mis-spoken.  But my concern is that as conservatives this gives voice to all the accusations the Libs and the MSM like to lay at our feet.  Lay down with the dogs and you get up with fleas.

I love Ann Coulter (don't tel

I love Ann Coulter (don't tell my wife).

In fact, I was the moderator of her fan club for almost 3 years.

The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.

Ann Coulter is an embarrassme

Ann Coulter is an embarrassment to the right-wing Conservative movement. I am all for being funny and lighthearted, but she is not. She is simply a mean angry woman with an ax to grind, something to prove, and a bank account to fill.

Sorry, but there is nothing nice about her. If she is the best that the right-wing Christian movement has to represent us and our causes, no wonder we are having such a hard time.

Every time she has the platform, she talks and talks and talks, and yet says absolutely nothing.

Can we get someone out there who will say something of substance?

Debra...

Debra...Zing!Everything just

Debra...

Zing!

Everything just flies over your head doesn't it?

Gee, what a wet blanket, like I said,you are just a barrel of laughs.

You certainly do not speak for all the so-called right wing Christian conservatives...that's a fact.

Sorry, bigtimer, You and I ju

Sorry, bigtimer,

You and I just disagree on this. There's a time and place for most everything and Ann Coulter does not know the first thing about how to behave in certain settings.

Oh Debra...Like only you do..

Oh Debra...

Like only you do...eh?

LOL!

What better time or place?

Name where you think it is appropriate according to you and your self-righteous life, where would that would be?

double post deleted

double post deleted

Debra...You are a self-righte

Debra...

You are a self-righteous bore, and dense to-boot.

If you aren't married I see why, if you are I pray for your other half.

He certainly needs it with an ice queen like you...

Being self-righteous must make you think you are just so special....

Not.

But hey, that's just my opinion, we must agree to disagree...eh?

gee, bigtimer, all this for h

gee, bigtimer, all this for having to delete a double post of mine? Sorry, I will try to be more careful in the future as to not have a need to delete a post. My response to what you said, is right under this.

Debra..You understood every s

Debra..

You understood every single word I said, it still applies and always will.

Enough for now before I get angry.

LOL!

kay...

:o)

bigtimer, Well, now, let me t

bigtimer,

Well, now, let me think... Perhaps as a guest on The Jay Leno Show? Oh, but that's right, she blew that appearance as well, by spending the entire segment fighting with Jay Leno.

This latest appearance of Ann Coulter's, was at the American Conservative Union Political Action Conference. Sorry, but, I did not hear one thing come from her poorly delivered amateur night comedy show routine, remotely resembling that which should have been said at such an appearance. She was so busy trying to be funny, that she said nothing of any substance. She missed yet another opportunity to say something worth hearing.

It is fine to 'add' humor into the mix, but dang, she didn't have a mix. Her entire 'speech' (if one can call it that) was a stand-up comedian act --a very poor one, at that.

Deb

Deb,

As you might imagine, I'm not with you on this one. I think Ann is the perfect, young, fresh, outspoken conservative for the new millennium. Frankly, I think we need more voices like hers.

Now, please don't confuse my praise for a tacit approval of everything she says. Honestly, I've never met anybody that I agree with 100 percent of the time, and this certainly includes Ann. In fact, I don't really like this Edwards comment.

However, I think conservatives need some edgy spokespeople that are willing to shock the public from time to time. In reality, we're not just looking to secure the status quo anymore. Oddly, that's become more of a liberal trait, although they certainly would argue this point touth and nail.

With that in mind, does Ann say and write some truly provocative, borderline offensive things know and then? Sure. But maybe we need more of that to wake the public up to the problems the left seem willing to hide under the rug to protect the socialist elements of our government that they have advanced in the past seven decades. Think about it.  ns 

Hi Noel,See, that's just it.

Hi Noel,

See, that's just it. I don't see anything fresh about Ann Coulter. I see a very angry woman who is giving the right-wing Christian movement a bad name. She is playing the left-wing game --and she is quite robotic about it. The only thing about Ann Coulter that is not robotic, is her anger. Her anger comes across as quite natural. And her anger makes her the perfect puppet for people making a lot of money off of the right-wing movement --which is obviously fine with her because it fills her pockets as well.

Please don't get me wrong. I realize that the left-wing liberals will look at most of us right-wingers with contempt no matter what we do. But that does not mean that we have to give them unnecessary cause to. And if they are going to 'hate' us for what we say, let's make what we say, truly worth saying --funny or not funny. She was just delivering a bunch of pre-written jokes, written on a piece of paper.

hmm... I suppose it is possible that I am miss-informed about just what Ann Coulter's position is, within the right-wing movement. Is she suppose to be portraying the right-wing angry jester?

Debra...

Ps.. You know I love your threads, Noel. I am honored that you addressed me, even if we dissagree. :o)

Deb darling, I hate to be t

Deb darling, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but to the left, you and all other Christians already have a bad name. You're pure evil. They hate you and every other person of strong faith. When they go on about 'Separation of Church and State' they want all Christians out of government completely. You already have zero credibility with them, so how could those opinions sink lower than zero?

If Ann were a nice soft spoken lady like yourself, no disrespect, but no one would give her the time of day. Liberals only focus on those they believe they can paint as mean spirited and bad. Ann gives them what they want, and in the process, shows them what hypocrites they are... as they never seem to condemn the Bush=Hitler comparisons and talk of assasination films as 'Art' and 'Free Speech'.

I don't get anger from Ann. I get disgust, shame, incredulity, and amazement from her... I see her trying to shock people awake as it seems that most in America sleep while the Commies slowly take over. We're not a free country any more. Just try and not pay taxes. Just try and do what you want on your land, build a house without permission and they'll come on to your land and tear down what you've built. Are we free? Barely... and Ann wants to shock people like you to start waking up... because if the lion share of people like you Deb do not stand up and say "Enough is Enough" our country will soon be gone and we'll all be living in an English speaking France.

____________________________________________________

"These are the times that try men's souls." ~ Thomas Paine

I have been having some site

Hi liberal_bug_zapper,

I have been having some site problems with my front page, but if my front page actually works for you, you can see that I agree with you about the state of our nation: www.InformingChristians.com.

Debra...

Hi Deb,Surprisingly enough,

Hi Deb,

Surprisingly enough, I'm not a Christian. I don't subscribe to any religion. I'm more agnostic than anything else. However, that being said, I completely support a Christians right to practice his or her religion, no matter where they are, whether it is in school, or government. My belief is that the government makes no rule one way or the other. If a Christian is Elected to a legislative position, then by all means, they can legislate the bible for all I care. While I may disagree with what they may be wanting to legislate, I'm comfortable with the legislative process that it will do it's job. This is also why I hate the idea of direct democracy or the referendum. Referendums are tantamount to tyranny of the majority. This isn't a proper legislative measure and should be stopped and opposed where ever it is practiced. Only closet socialists like referendums.

Back on topic; I believe that what Ann is doing is calling out most on the left for their blatant hypocrisy. I also hate the PC police, so I tend to use words and phrases that cheese the 'Faggot stackers' off. (a little secret, type; 'define: faggot' without the hash marks (') into Google and you'll see what I'm referring to).

Anyway, if it wasn't for controversy, no conservative pundit would get equal time in the news.

____________________________________________________

"These are the times that try men's souls." ~ Thomas Paine

liberal_but_zapper,::: laughi

liberal_but_zapper,

::: laughing :::.. yes, a little controversy, does at times, get things done --a little... :o)

Oh, and it is true that we are a Republic, not a Democracy. You are right. A Democracy is 'mob rule.' Referendums are only good under certain conditions.

You believe that referendum

You believe that referendums are good? Why? How does it preserve our freedom? Mob rule or direct democracy is dangerous and bad since mobs become stupid. The intelligence of a mob is rated to it's lowest denominator. If you understand that, then you'll understand why protesters are so stupid... even when supposedly smart people participate.

Referendums are dangerous because it puts important decisions into a flash poll. You likely only like referendums when they go your way, but if your side begins losing them, you'll see that they are no good. Legislative Democracy is far better because it insures that it takes time and effort to make laws.

This is also why I think that we need to stop taking polls. Polls do not mean a thing since not everyone is paying attention to the polls. You can't poll 1,000 people and then extrapolate what the entire electorate thinks from that... the idea that you can is ludicrous and dangerous. Leaders who cite polls should be voted out of office the very next election, because any leader who wets the finger to see which way the wind is blowing isn't really a leader.

So in conclusion, referendums are never ever good.... ever!

____________________________________________________

"Lead, follow or get out of the way." ~ Thomas Paine

liberal_bug_zapper,I believe

dang! another double post --shhh... don't tell bigtimer..

liberal_bug_zapper,I believe

liberal_bug_zapper,

I believe that referendums are good only in certain circumstances, only circumstances that legislation has good reason to believe the general public is qualified to vote on. But, for most things? We are supposed to be putting statesmen type people into office to begin with. (However, that clearly is not always the case.)

Debraj - my problem with you is that I simply do not understand

Debraj - my problem with you is that I simply do not understand the points you try to make on this site.

I have been watching and listening (reading) your posts for quite a while now and I have yet to see any original thought.

What is your point?  Ann Coulter says stuff that is controversial?  So what?

Try Joe Biden.  Try Teddy Kennedy?  Try Paul Krugman?  Try Hillary?

I would be tempted to say, "Get off your High Horse", but frankly, I don't think it would matter to you.

There is a Blog Post here (a thread if you would) that talks about the insanity of the MSM promoting the far-left by ignoring their profanity in the Internet.

There are times when I think your promotion of your position approaches profanity.

Just to let you know I am really tired of the stuff you keep advocating here.

ACA

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

DebJMS,I do not do tv, howeve

DebJMS,

I do not do tv, however i do the video links that NB provides.+ others .

Remember that a faggot (girth 24") is really a bundle of sticks, (32" long).

Please cancel your dial -up service, sign -up for wide band so that you can WATCH THE VIDEO LINKS HERE. I'm begging you. well not really <arms ah flapping>

upcountrywater, ::: laughing

upcountrywater,

::: laughing ::: Can you believe that I came up with what I said, with high-speed internet? Yes, I listened to her entire, umm.. comedy show.

But, that aside, it was the entire 'show' that came across as bad to me, not just that one comment.

Thanks for the giggle...

Debra... :o)

laughter is the best medicine

laughter is the best medicine, sweet. 

Ann is good ,really GOOD

What would you do??????????????

One must start the race to finish it.

GO!!

It is not a question as to wh

It is not a question as to what would I do. It is a question of, what should anyone in Ann Coulter's position do.

Debra:  I find it fascinatin

Debra:  I find it fascinating that all the folks who don't agree with you appear to be (or, at least claim to be) men.  Now, I guess some rather deranged men might find Ann Falter physically attractive, if they go for the skank crack addict look, but that's besides the point.  At a certain point in most men's lives they realize the truth of the proposition that women are almost always better judges of women then men.  For obvious and not so obvious reasons.

Those who waste time not agreeing with you would be wise to think about what you have to say.  But there's one absolute truth about 99.99% of the posters on this website - they already know it all and have no interest in learning anything new or unlearning anything they already know.

Bottom line - these men are too stupid for you, Debra.  You deserve better.

Ahem. Yoo-hoo. jfrank. QueenM

Ahem. Yoo-hoo. jfrank. QueenMum - woman. Complete with accessories. And not threatened by a young, intelligent woman like Ann Coulter - even if she's way too thin to be my friend. ;)

Hi j. frank wilson,I think th

Hi j. frank wilson,

I think that many (not all) people here have their minds made up to defend her, no matter what.

What is interesting is that many here (not all) who defend Ann Coulter for her boldness to say what she is thinking, seek to stop me from speaking against what she does.

Debra... :o)

Debra: &quot;seek to stop me&

Debra: "seek to stop me" ? The typical lib complaint. Have you also suffered retribution and repercussions for expressing dissent? Have you been prevented from posting your comments?

Challenging your point of view does not constitute preventing you from having your say.

My Take Your Grace

My take your grace (and as always good to see you back),

I think she suffers from any-other-woman-than-me envy.  This thread it seems to be Ann in her cross-hairs.  When she first started posting here I wanted to give her the benefit of doubt - then I went to her website.  Upon viewing her site and seeing how intolerant our little angel was of others/faiths, more red flags went up than a May Day parade at Tian'anmen Square.  Catholic? bad  Mormon? bad Any-other-faith-than-DebraJSmiths? bad.

Having said that I can only pity her.  Anyone (other than a government leader) that lives in such an intolerant world while considering their own personal beliefs beyond reproach evokes my pity.  I take her posts here at NB for what they are - A child trying to act all grown up.

Having said that, I think she truly means well and I wish her no ill.  That is all I will ever have to say publicly on that subject. Charity prevents me from saying more.

Ann Coulter

I could be wrong, but I can't help but come to the conclusion that Debra's dislike for Ann is because Ann supports Romney.  I do not see her as even close to being angry.  Rosie is angry.  Ann just laughs at her enemies, and I think she handles the drive bys with great charm and wit. 

Conservative Voice, Now, you

Conservative Voice,

Now, you be sure to remember that you are who brought up Romney. And no, I did not know that Ann Coulter supports Romney. And if she does, then among other things, she is a hypocrite too.

Debra...

debra do your homework

then it is proof you haven't seen the video debra, hence you are proving to everyone here that you did not do your homework when you made claims that Ann is angry.  Instead you post talking points that the drive by liberal trolls make, that should bother you.

Conservative Voice,You are ju

Conservative Voice,

You are just wanting to fight. Of course I watched the video. Just because I did not see something the way you saw it, does not mean that I did not see the video. Try to behave, David.

debra

This is a repost, as apparently my post last night was removed due to server problems. So I will do my best to remember what I wrote. Not trying to fight with you. I came to the conclusion that you didn't see the video because she spent a couple of minutes on why she is supporting Mit, and not anyone else. It isn't how I saw it, its fact. So now I am left with either you are not as observant as I thought, or not telling me the truth. Since I know you to not be a liar, I will give you the benefit of the doubt on the latter, but you have proven you see what you want to see and ig