It's a tried and true tactic of interest groups seeking to influence public opinion -- and legislative policy -- on a controversial issue. Find the most sympathetic individual case you can, and get the media to focus on that, rather than on the broaders merits of the matter. A prime example of the phenomenon was on display today at Good Morning America. Congressman Marty Meehan [D-MA] has introduced legislation that would repeal the Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell policy, with the result that gays would be able to serve openly in the military. Hearings are scheduled to begin soon.
ABC senior national correspondent Jake Tapper narrated a segment on Marine Staff Sergeant Eric Alva [ret], described as the first member of the US military seriously injured in the Iraq invasion, losing a leg and part of a hand. In conjunction with the debate on the bill, Sergeant Alva publicly announced, apparently for the first time today, that he is gay. Tapper interviewed Sergeant Alva at the offices of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group. Later in the segment, we heard from Dixon Osburn of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, another gay rights group that focuses specifically on gays in the military. It seems likely that one or both of these groups have identified Alva as a spokesman, then took his story to ABC, which ran with it.
View video here.
One network news correspondent told me: “Every interest group does this sort of thing - witness the snowflake babies, crime victims, the 21-week old premature baby. The media loves a good new story, whatever the side.” ABC and the rest of the media would serve viewers better by presenting a substantive discussion/debate on issues such as this. And despite the correspondent's claim that the media goes for this kind of story "whatever the side," it seems to this observer that the anecdotes, like the MSM, tend to lean decidedly to the left.
Mark was in Iraq in November. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
does that mean that i can now
February 28, 2007 - 14:06 ET by buddycdoes that mean that i can now enlist. i am married to my sister, mary sue and her husband billy bob as well as my second cousin buckie who is 12????? we are a loving and caring family.
i hope they hurry i will soon be too old to enlist. by the way i am looking forward to being able to shower with all this buff naked soldiers!!! do i have to carry a gun?
Um...what?
February 28, 2007 - 14:13 ET by balboaUm...what?
Policy based on a vast minority
February 28, 2007 - 14:43 ET by exLibIf there was one group on this planet that, if you didn't know better, you would think made up a vast majority of the population.
If you took the amount of stories sympathetic to homosexuals and matched them against those stories sympathetic to Christians I am sure you find that the vast minority in this country get the most positive press. And as noted above, political activist type of press.
It seems that much of Liberal policy and even liberal arguments against Conservative policy is based on minorities so small that if the truth were told wouldn't rate even a mention.
What is the basis for gun control? That a small fraction of the population are abusing hand-guns and that maybe, just maybe if someone gets mad and they don't have a gun they aren't going to hurt someone.
Abortion? A small, small minotiry of women will die because of backroom abortions.
The list goes on...
Have you ever seen the stat
February 28, 2007 - 17:03 ET by Tim the EnchanterHave you ever seen the stats of the women who die from "safe, legal" abortions? You'd be suprised.