LGF and Ace have some interesting posts on how leftist readers of the site consistently vote stories with conservative messages off the front page.
IMO this is yet another example of the left better using technology than the right.
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digging LeftwardLGF and Ace have some interesting posts on how leftist readers of the site consistently vote stories with conservative messages off the front page. IMO this is yet another example of the left better using technology than the right.
Read comments
Related StoriesMost Emailed Stories
Related Topics |
|
|
[ Home | Blogs |
Forum |
About |
Contact
]
| |
Comments Policy
Add the digg button, can't hu
February 24, 2007 - 23:12 ET by AtheistRepublicanAdd the digg button, can't hurt and shouldn't take long to add.
Digg and NB
February 24, 2007 - 23:29 ET by Eric TurnerDigg is very much dominated by liberals. However, that should not stop NB from attempting to contribute to the Digg community. If we give up the battle without a fight then we've already lost the war.
It is very hard to get a conservative story on the front page of Digg but it can be done. We've got to encourage more conservatives to register and start voting on Digg.
I often digg stories from NB even without a digg button. It can be done. It's just easier with the digg button. I registered on Digg back in November I believe and just do what I can along with a few other conservatives to get the word out. We get beaten down often and buried but we keep trying. It's simply incredible the lack of tolerance they have to all things conservative.
Something that might be done on NB is an article on the non-partisanship of Digg or at the least the overwhelming presence of liberals and their dominance of the site along with examples of their hate speech! There's one guy on there - "AdmiralAdama" who constantly posts articles on muslim extremism and islamic activities and folks continually accuse him of racism and such.
The love of Islamic fundamentalism is equivalent to the love of it on Youtube.
The situation is bad at Digg but we should do what we can. I don't know if placing stories on Digg would bring more folks to NB, but it certainly can't hurt.
It is an example of the left using technology better than the right, but that shouldn't steer our course. Our course should be set by what is right - and that would be meeting the left on their own ground.
I can't count the number of times, I see a leftist bury a conservative article just because it came from FOX or Malkin's site. They consider it spam or simply unreliable and will state so and then bury it.
NB is a great site, but I think NB should include a number of things to improve it and go to the next level in terms of the blogosphere and such.
This is definitely one of my top five sites.
I know this comment is somewhat convoluted but my ISP is running slow - again.
ET
February 25, 2007 - 00:20 ET by BlondeEric,
I remember you recommending digg.com a while back...as a further link or somesuch.
What, exactly, is digg?
I know there are numerous sites I visit that have "digg it".
Can you clue me in before I sign up and get spammed for life?
Thanks, E!
Blonde - Digg in a nutshell
February 25, 2007 - 00:52 ET by Eric TurnerBlonde,
I certainly wish I could provide a really good synopsis of what Digg is but I believe I might be a little off the mark here.
It is, if nothing else, a bookmarking site - a place where you can centrally locate articles you find across the internet rather than bookmarking them on your web browser.
It is a place you can find other articles that you may find interesting from other like-minded individuals.
It is a place you can digg articles that you feel are significant or interesting in some way (articles can be from many various categories - politics, world news, political opinion, videos, entertainment, computers, electronics, etc). It's not just a political site.
Lastly, and perhaps most significantly, it is a place various news agencies can locate articles they see are moving up on the list to the front page and it may garner more interest in mainstream media outlets.
Now this last point cannot be verified by me - it is something I've heard and it makes sense to me. This is the reason why conservatives need to register on Digg and start taking part.
I will say that no one on NB is going to change the minds of the liberals on it (who are sometimes called 'diggerals' as a derogatory name). They are very entrenched in their hatred of all things conservative, Bush and (many times) American.
To be on Digg it doesn't require much time. Maybe a few minutes a day is enough to just go on and "digg up" good articles. You don't need to comment. Digging good articles and burying bad articles are enough. You can go a step further and digg or bury individual comments as well.
Whether an article makes it to the front page is dependent on many factors - the number of diggs, the number of burys, the number of comments, the number of comments dugg or buried, etc. It's almost like reading tea leaves.
Herein lies the issue of liberal bias in the control of the front page. They can simply make a story disappear or appear on the front page without apparent rhyme or reason. It makes little sense to me, but one thing is certain - if an article has an overwhelming number of diggs it would seem they would have to post it on the front page which of course gets it more coverage throughout the internet and perhaps throughout the blogosphere.
That's it in a nutshell. Don't quote me on any of this as I am not an expert on it and probably have gotten much of it wrong.
Hope it helps.
Bottom line? Register and try it out. I'm known as "armyvet" add me as a friend when you do.
Thanks ET
February 25, 2007 - 01:02 ET by BlondeThanks, Eric.
I just remember that you'd mentioned digg. And also that you'd cross posted someones comments here (I think it was someone who went to the "anti-war" rally with the "peace Duck").
Thanks for the info...I shall register and try it out.
Wow, am I glad to be home!
Eric
February 25, 2007 - 01:05 ET by Noel SheppardET,
That's a good description. And, I'm with you. I understand what the downsides are, and the frustrations that are bound to occur like what's happening to LGF. However, exposure is exposure, and when it's free, why not take advantage of it? ns
LGF
February 25, 2007 - 01:13 ET by Eric TurnerWRT LGF, I assume you're speaking of their issue with the BBC boards?
ET
February 25, 2007 - 01:27 ET by Noel SheppardET,
No. I'm referring to Charles' post today that Matt linked to here. You should take a look. ns
LGF and Digg
February 25, 2007 - 01:57 ET by Eric TurnerI'll be a son of a gun. I just typed out a big ole thing on this and it disappeared. I read the link.
I was unaware this happened recently with LGF. However, I do see it happen constantly with all the regular conservative sites - malkin, hotair, LGF, NB, Ace of Spades, Blackfive, et al. I see it on certain topics regardless of website they originate from - anything to do with debunking global warming, or negative towards liberal candidates (Obama specifically), anything negative about muslim or islam in general - it all gets buried.
It's very discouraging. But it shouldn't deter us from posting there. If they are able to (what's the word I'm looking for...) engage hundreds, if not thousands, of people to bury or digg articles advantageous to their political views then we should be able to do the same. We can make all the jokes we want about they not having a job, etc...but still, we should be able to do it somehow.
As you said, exposure is exposure!
ET...Now that you have explai
February 25, 2007 - 18:06 ET by bigtimerET...
Now that you have explained all of this very very well about Digg I will check it out today...again, I didn't quite understand how it worked, nor did I take a lot of time to really try either to be honest....I think you have a great idea. I still have it bookmarked from the last time we chatted about it...will definitely check out again...
Thanks for all the information.
Digg.com
February 25, 2007 - 00:26 ET by CaliosGreat point Eric. We, the right-extremists, should not be afraid or deterred from visiting and commenting at leftist sites and like the leftist here on this site try, cause consternation to those who can not tolerate us. It amuses me how those on the left visit and think they cause us, right-extremists, to be discombobulate not realizing we are really laughing and shaking our heads in disappointment at their remarks.
When the enemy is willing to invade your territory and does not expect you to do likewise, you cause them great damage and peril when you do so. Remember the aggressor always sets the rules and 99% of the time is the victor. There is nothing more demoralizing than being defeated in your backyard. This is not only true for this topic, but on the War on Terror.
Calios - I don't particularly enjoy being labled as a right-wing
February 25, 2007 - 18:06 ET by acaiguanaCalios - I don't particularly enjoy being labled as a right-wing extremist.
Thanks anyway.
Where do you think that helps your presence here? Sounds to me like a planted post, to start. Second, most of the folks here are not extremist in thier minds; but they don't compromise principles quickly. Is that what you mean as opposed to a waffling Liberal Extremist?
Like to get a clearer definition of your post here.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
Yes, right-wing extremist i
February 27, 2007 - 02:24 ET by liberal_bug_zapperYes, right-wing extremist is a derogatory term.... we prefer our real titles of "Advocates and Champions of Fairness and Freedom!"
____________________________________________________
"These are the times that try men's souls." ~ Thomas Paine
IMO this is yet another examp
February 24, 2007 - 23:47 ET by DemonhunterIMO this is yet another example of the left better using technology than the right.
I thought it was a case of leftists having more time with nothing better (or productive) to do. I have a job, family, church, community, and a full-time wife. Oh yeah, and I have to play tennis several times a week.
If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons
Check check, did that end the
February 24, 2007 - 23:59 ET by AtheistRepublicanCheck check, did that end the bold?
Ok I know its silly but it really bothers me when people don't end their html, I think its your quotes fault Demonhunter, you think you could fix that?
I presume you mean my tagline
February 26, 2007 - 20:21 ET by DemonhunterI presume you mean my tagline, not the quote in italics. My fault, I just presumed it would not carry on beyond my post. I shall change it.
Did this work OK?
If it's not the Crusades, it's the cartoons
Add It
February 24, 2007 - 23:50 ET by emjem24I say add the button. A little balance is in order and from what I've seen and heard this is the site that needs that special NB touch. Can't hurt, can it? What are the liberals gonna do, cry: "how dare those filthy NBer's post stories on OUR site." It's time to turn Digg from a predominantly THEIR site to a site that everyone can contribute to without being shut down by the "in" crowd.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Digg it.
February 25, 2007 - 04:11 ET by Al TealIt is a lonely world as a conservative on Digg. Actually, I have a lot of fun. The loony-toon left has almost a stranglehold on the popular articles but a few honest stories get through.
The diggerals hate George Bush as much as Osama does, and their enraged diatribes are often very amusing.
I would vote to put a digg button on NB submissions. More conservatives actively participating in liberal domains is a good thing.
Al Teal
IMO this is yet another exa
February 25, 2007 - 07:44 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsIMO this is yet another example of the left better using technology than the right.
This seems more an example of the left abusing technology to silence opposing voices. Digg says:
"If you find stories with bad links, off-topic content, or duplicate
entries, click “Bury.” That’s how we get the spam out of the system."
Sounds good, but what really happens is the left uses the 'Bury' button to squash what they don't like and what they don't want to be heard. I wonder if all these people who are busy silencing voices they don't like are on the payroll of someone like George Soros or his ilk.
D
Want your elected reps to know what you think? Go to Congress.org, it's real easy.
You can also send faxes to your reps about immigration from
DFTT the laughable thing is t
February 25, 2007 - 07:46 ET by Chicago RepublicanDFTT the laughable thing is this is exactly what the Wombats on this site accuse NewsBusters of doing.
**************
Support the Spread of Open Society and Capitalism around the World. Do it for the Children.
I registered on digg last sum
February 25, 2007 - 14:43 ET by winston smithI registered on digg last summer. nearly everytime I posted a comment on a news article, I was soon thereafter challenged to a message board "flame war" by some 15 or 16-year-old. Great idea, digg----but there's just way too many obscene, ill-bred teenie-boppers lurking about. Register and you'll see, you'll tire quickly of all the juvenile, anti-Bush, anti-Fox rhetoric.
Most of them are actually i
February 27, 2007 - 02:28 ET by liberal_bug_zapperMost of them are actually in their late 20s and mid 30s, they're just liberals, so they "seem" to be 15 year olds.
____________________________________________________
"These are the times that try men's souls." ~ Thomas Paine
Are we really working now?Jus
February 25, 2007 - 17:07 ET by bigtimerAre we really working now?
Just curious....never seen a page that said web page forbidden before...weird.
Of course I'm not PC savvy..just glad we're up!
Can ya Digg it?
By the way av....I know you've recommended this site before...I will read more later as I see above if this site stays in!
Just thought I'd add that in becuase I didn't find an open thread...lol!
BT
February 25, 2007 - 17:16 ET by Noel SheppardBT,
We got slammed about an hour ago when Drudge picked up Brent's piece about Ugly Betty. We're back! :-) ns
Thanks Noel...Now what does s
February 25, 2007 - 17:25 ET by bigtimerThanks Noel...
Now what does slammed mean?
I do know disappear!
Sounds delightful in a perverse way though! (Maybe)...lol!
<edit> never-mind the explanation Noel, I got it....btw...when we went down I always go to Drudge to make sure it isn't my IPS or PC...and I saw that there this morning...'Ugly Betty" story that is....so never clicked it on to read, I went back since and clicked it on....and no explanation is necessary now.....it was definitely a good thing!
LOL!
BT
February 25, 2007 - 18:04 ET by Noel SheppardBT,
"Sounds delightful in a perverse way though! (Maybe)...lol!"
Yikes. In the interest of decorum, I'm going to have to leave that alone despite my baser inclinations. :-)
That said, when one of our articles gets linked by Drudge, the influx of hits can swamp the servers making it next to impossible to get in. To rectify the situation, the post has to be separated somehow from the rest of the system. This is why if you click on the Ugly Betty post, you'll be logged off as a member, and won't be able to log on.
So, though getting slammed can be pleasant at times, in this instance, those doing the slamming were not experiencing such, and neither were those on the receiving end.
As a result, taking this a perverted step further, one could say that all involved were "slammed," but not in the potentially good sense of the word...if you catch my drift. :-) ns
Once again Noel...Thank you.Y
February 25, 2007 - 18:14 ET by bigtimerOnce again Noel...
Thank you.
Your explanation here is just what I needed to really understand how this works.
Not a good thing indeed....now delete my above post would ya!
Laughing with embarrassment at not knowing a dang thing but learning in a matter of minutes....thanks.
Matt, I must disagree that th
February 25, 2007 - 17:23 ET by FastEdMatt, I must disagree that the left has a better understanding of technoology the those of us on the right. It pretty much comes down to the old - follow the money! You see, the leftards ususally are on the dol (sic) - unemployment, while the rest of us need to be at work, to support our families and those on unemployment. So, you see, they have the time to the techno dances and are able to delete or stuff the ballot boxes, so to speak, of sites that go against their twisted veiew of the world. Being realistic, would you like to lose the freebies? They may be stupid in the ways of the world and reality, but they ain't dumb.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Diggdom
February 25, 2007 - 18:12 ET by d1carterI have been Digging for about a year now particularly in Politics and Political Opinion. I think it was originally developed for techie types. It seems to be a haven for college kids with lots of time on their hands. They join together to bury posts from certain sources. LGF and Michelle Malkin are their favorites to bury. Commenting on posts can be fun just to see how long you can stay in the running. I have posted posts from NB before, without the Digg button. I have a Digg This! option on Firefox that allows me to post anything to Digg. Give it a try, you'll see the wolves come out.
The left is way beyond the
February 27, 2007 - 01:38 ET by liberal_bug_zapperThe left is way beyond the right in their ability to manipulate technology for their gain. At the moment, they have the upper hand. More leftists are politically active on the Internet than are those of us on the right.
We can change it, but it will take some time to see the momentum shift.
____________________________________________________
"These are the times that try men's souls." ~ Thomas Paine
Looks like it's not just af
March 1, 2007 - 09:21 ET by sarcasmoLooks like it's not just affected by politics, but by money. (My vote's for sale at the right price, too!!)
JMR