As sickening as it might seem, Al Gore appears to be a lock to win an Academy Award Sunday for his schlockumentary about global warming. Unfortunately, the real inconvenient truth is that the film appears to violate the Academy’s own rules concerning documentaries.
As reported by CNSNews Thursday:
According to the "rule 12" standard for documentary films established by the Academy, while it is permissible to employ storytelling devices such as re-enactments, stock footage, stills and animations, the emphasis must be on fact and not fiction.
The critics argue that in the case of "An Inconvenient Truth," the criteria are not met.
Here are some of the specifics:
One point of contention in Gore's movie is animated footage of a polar bear struggling to find stable sea ice. Gore has argued that human-induced global warming is directly impacting polar bears' habitat and sea ice in particular. Consequently, he suggests, polar bears are forced to swim longer distances and sometimes drown in the process.
"A new scientific study shows that for the first time they're finding polar bears that have actually drowned swimming long distances - up to sixty miles - to find the ice," Gore says in the movie.
John Berlau, author of a new book on the environmental movement entitled "Eco-Freaks," claims the polar bear scene alone should disqualify Gore's film from consideration for best documentary, because it departs from reality.
Berlau noted that while the movie's companion book says the bears were drowning in "significant numbers," the study Gore is most likely referring to only found four polar bear carcasses in the sea off Alaska.
That episode took place after a severe storm, he noted, but Gore makes no reference to a storm during the film's animated polar bear sequence.
But there’s more:
Gore also never cites a source for his polar bear claim, Berlau points out, but scientists on both sides of the polar bear debate told Cybercast News Service he was probably referring to a recent report filed by the U.S. Minerals Management Service.
Researchers with the service in 2004 found four dead polar bears floating in the sea off Alaska but said in a report that the bears "are believed to have drowned as a result of the storm."
Berlau, an analyst at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) - an organization known for global warming skepticism - who has also written about the entertainment industry, said the polar bear sequence does not square with a large body of scientific evidence.
"The polar bear cartoon was the emotional linchpin of this movie for a lot of people, but the science behind it was not rooted in truth and is a violation of rule 12 on many levels," Berlau told Cybercast News Service.
There are indeed precedents for “documentaries” which falsify or recreate events being either disqualified after the fact, or not considered for Oscars at all:
He cited as an example a 1958 Disney documentary "White Wilderness," which won an Oscar but was subsequently discredited. Film crew had apparently induced lemmings to jump off a cliff in an effort to highlight the species' suicidal behavior.
If those standards were still in effect, "An Inconvenient Truth" would be disqualified, Berlau said.
Other more recent examples involving storytelling techniques described in rule 12 include "The Thin Blue Line" (1988) about the shooting of a Dallas police officer, and "Touching the Void" (2005), a film about a near-fatal climb in the Peruvian Andes.
Both films received critical acclaim but, Berlau said, ultimately fell short of serious Oscar contention because the Academy took issue with the use of re-enactments.Fascinating.
The article gave other examples as to why Gore’s film should never have been nominated based upon the Academy’s own rules. Unfortunately, it appears irrelevant when politics are involved as stated early in the piece: “Documentaries that distort reality and shade the truth are insulated from criticism so long as they advance left-wing causes.”
I guess this gives conservatives one more reason to do something else on Sunday.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Moore and Rule 12
February 23, 2007 - 15:03 ET by Gary HallHey Noel - I'm afraid precedent will rule. Michael Moore got his. On both Bowling for $'s (hee hee) and F-911, Moore, was caught rather clearly stating that they were satirical pieces, or opinion pieces - not documentaries.And this time, the entire planet is a stake! Yaaaaaaaaaa! (got to run). (;~> gary
I'm gonna stick my neck waaaa
February 23, 2007 - 15:04 ET by Clear thinkerI'm gonna stick my neck waaaaaay out there and predict Gore will win an Oscar.
Like Hollywood is gonna dis him or something, yeah right!
this is the world
February 23, 2007 - 15:10 ET by tumbler_2007Yeah; nobody ought to be surpised; but after all--
He still has to face his mug in the mirror every morning. (Ugga Bugga.)
Why let a stupid thing like
February 23, 2007 - 15:12 ET by motherbeltWhy let a stupid thing like rules get in the way of making a political point??????
This film is WAY more important than any arbitrary made-up rules!
As the Dims say, "It's n
February 23, 2007 - 19:43 ET by ThisnThatAs the Dims say, "It's not the facts or the truth that should be considered -- it's the seriousness of the charge".
According to the "rule
February 23, 2007 - 15:24 ET by JDWAccording to the "rule 12" standard for documentary films established by the Academy, while it is permissible to employ storytelling devices such as re-enactments, stock footage, stills and animations, the emphasis must be on fact and not fiction.
Consider the previous '24' blog and ask oneself which way is up?
JDW
Wounded skier, beware of mistakes.
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
Scoreboard for TerroristsI re
February 23, 2007 - 19:40 ET by ThisnThatScoreboard for Terrorists
I read that on Rush's web site today. The soldier that called in really hit the nail on the head. Good by-line, JDW.
TnT...Rush also loved that li
February 23, 2007 - 19:44 ET by Clear thinkerTnT...
Rush also loved that line today.
The soldier that was on his show today was one of the best call-ins in awhile. Thank God for our military!
Ditto that.
February 23, 2007 - 19:52 ET by ThisnThatDitto that.
I second that JDW!I heard the
February 23, 2007 - 19:46 ET by bigtimerI second that JDW!
I heard the soldier also today...that soldier said it all!
Great tag-line which I also noticed earlier and haven't been able to get back and comment on yet JDW...I am in the middle of things at home, and a little of this too!
And here Holywood thought the
February 23, 2007 - 15:29 ET by Dan The Man 2And here Holywood thought the rule of 12 was used only in the porn industry where a 12 rules.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
And the Academy Awards peop
February 23, 2007 - 15:45 ET by DyneAnd the Academy Awards people wonder why their ratings have been dropping for several years in a row. The answer is simple, most Americans don't care about politics.
"I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please everyone." - Bill Cosby
Break The Rules Win An Award
February 23, 2007 - 16:47 ET by emjem24Can the Oscars get any more twisted or warped? Al Whore's documentary should never have been considered for nomination based on this discovery. This just goes to show there's no rhyme or reason to the Oscars. If you take a look at all these documentary nominees, they're all liberal attack pieces on conservatives. What a message to impart to our kids if Al Whore wins: break the rules, win an award. Hollywood is full of people who cheat, lie, steal, and break down whatever is still great and wonderful about America.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Let's not forget: spread ju
February 23, 2007 - 16:53 ET by DyneLet's not forget: spread junk science through fear-mongering, hysteria, lack of evidence, and being hypocritical also earns one an honorary doctorate these days.
"I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please everyone." - Bill Cosby
There are some things that
February 23, 2007 - 17:46 ET by Right2thePointThere are some things that are right and some things that are wrong.
Hollywood can always be depended on to give us a clue.
I can remember sitting thru
February 23, 2007 - 17:54 ET by Right2thePointI can remember sitting thru the trailer for Star Wars with a female friend, and she pointed and giggled at R2D2.
It was the last movie I ever went to.
I can just image the snoref
February 23, 2007 - 18:17 ET by Tom1969caI can just image the snorefest his acceptance speech will be...
~~~
Grammar Tip of the Day:
The phrase "I support the troops" should never be followed by the word "but".
Somebody should do a CO2-Carb
February 23, 2007 - 19:45 ET by ThisnThatSomebody should do a CO2-Carbon count on him, and make sure he has the carbon-credits to continue.
I'd prefer to see "Jesus Camp
February 23, 2007 - 18:28 ET by blarsenI'd prefer to see "Jesus Camp" win than Gore. In the short term, what "Jesus Camp" portrays is far more dangerous than global warming. It's pretty scary to see young children brainwashed by religious fanatics who believe it's okay to pollute the air and deforest the land rationalizing that it doesn't matter because the Earth will burn up during the rapture anyway. These are the people who believe the world is no more than 6,000 years old and whoever tells you otherwise has a "political agenda". This is truly Jim Jones territory.
I see you fell for that pro
February 23, 2007 - 18:36 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsI see you fell for that propaganda film disguised as documentary. Poor you. I realize it may be difficult and painful, but please try using your brain for a change.
D
Want your elected reps to know what you think? Go to Congress.org, it's real easy.
You can also send faxes to your reps about immigration from Nu
So you must believe the Earth
February 23, 2007 - 18:52 ET by blarsenSo you must believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old. I bet you also speak in tongues.
Wow. Two "Jesus Camp&quo
February 23, 2007 - 19:41 ET by Roger the ShrubberWow. Two "Jesus Camp" plugs in the same day, Blars? Is your mom the director?
Your fear of religion is amusing. The "douchebag footprint" you are leaving here at Newsbusters today is tremendous.
Hey shrub!Thanks for linking
February 23, 2007 - 21:16 ET by blarsenHey shrub!
Thanks for linking to my other post. Could you please make it a habit? Everyone here could have all blarsen all the time.
BTW, I have no fear of religion. I'm a Jehovah's Bystander. We believe in a higher power, we just don't want to get involved. The only religions I fear are the ones where people roll around on the floor, speaking in tongues, handling snakes, don't celebrate Christmas, drink alcohol in church, believe Jesus came to America in a wooden submarine.....You're right! I do fear religion. Thanks for the enlightenment shrub.
blarsen and irony
February 23, 2007 - 22:18 ET by UnsaneThe irony is, blarsen, is that you will throw a tantrum like a three year old over the mere existence of Amplitude Modulation radio frequencies, much less what is broadcast on them, yet you drink in all of the propaganda these "documentaries" provide as if there is no tomorrow.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
I am always glad to help the
February 24, 2007 - 07:44 ET by Roger the ShrubberI am always glad to help the slower-witted of the bunch. Anytime!
Jehovah's Bystander:
Some one who witnesses nothing.
Pretty much sums you up, doesn't it?
Ouch, Roger.
February 24, 2007 - 07:48 ET by acaiguanaOuch, Roger.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)
blarsen - you really need
February 24, 2007 - 10:57 ET by Dee Bunkblarsen - you really need to learn to think for yourself. Don't you know any Christians? Maybe you should visit some actual Churches and form an opinion rather than some one sided documentary.
I saw Jesus Camp and it didn't square with any Christians I know and I have even known some who were Pentecostal and I've been to Pentecostal Churches before. They are definitely not my style with their alter calls and speaking in tongues but if it works for them, who am I to judge? They don't act like the Pastor in that movie.
That movie implied that all Evangelical Christians were like that and Pentecostal's are only a small portion of Evangelicals and probably an even smaller percentage act like that and use terms of war in their sermons. Even still - what is the worst scariest thing that the people did in that movie? Pray peacefully in front of the Supreme Court to end abortion? Get a grip Blarsen - their are real religious fanatics strapping bombs to themselves and pledging to convert all of us to Islam or kill us and their numbers are exponential in comparison to this small group depicted in the documentary.
"but if it works for the
February 24, 2007 - 15:16 ET by curious"but if it works for them, who am I to judge." Well said, though I would add "and so long as they don't try to force their beliefs on me."
I may have questions with some of the basic tenets of Christianity, and I surely disagree with its narrow reduction by some in this country to condeming gays and abortion, but having seen the spiritual comfort that her religion has given my mother, I would never dismiss or belittle its beneficial effects, on individuals and on society.
In general, so long as religion (or mysticism, or idol worship, or, for that matter, sex and/or drugs) is practiced by informed and consenting adults, and does no material harm to others, then who am I to judge, much less condemn.
What I do condemn is the effort of others, either left wing nannies or right wing theocrats, to use the power of the state to force their beliefs on me.
Not a Leftist? Coulda fooled me...
February 24, 2007 - 17:46 ET by UnsaneAre you saying you are not a Leftist?
Ha! Not with your history of posts.
And what of us Rightists (me) who don't have a spiritual bone in our bodies?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Marlon Brando said it a lon
February 25, 2007 - 22:26 ET by ScottyDogMarlon Brando said it a long time ago, paraphrased, the Oscars are nothing more than a popularity contest and have nothing to do with art or talent.
Michelangelo had talent, Hollywood does not produce art nor talent.
Is this Mexico or the USA
Does anyone on this site know
February 26, 2007 - 22:37 ET by schmidtDoes anyone on this site know about sour grapes?
Nope!The liberal MSM has beco
February 26, 2007 - 22:39 ET by Clear thinkerNope!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Ya, I do! If you distill them
February 26, 2007 - 22:44 ET by mandrakeYa, I do! If you distill them, they turn into a fine whine... :-)
Mandrake...Excellent point. I
February 26, 2007 - 22:47 ET by Clear thinkerMandrake...
Excellent point.
I love those sour grapes!
The liberal MSM has become an enemy of the USA.
Thanks for reminding me about
February 26, 2007 - 22:56 ET by Chicago RepublicanThanks for reminding me about this, Schmidt...... I heard from Brother Rhayes the other day. He had just received his marching orders from Pat Robertson and was heading out to East LA to preach the Word and drive the demons from the Vampires when he told me something profound. He said that he was profoundly mistaken about the "neocons." He also, for the first time, was being counseled by Brother Pat in private about his affinity for "other men." I told him that I couldn't relate to that, but that I was happy that he was facing his sin head on with Brother Pat. Rhayes also confessed to me that he found Al Gore "hot" and that he knew that was wrong and wanted the forgiveness of the Lord. Rhayes told me that he struggled with "Gore's sexiness". He felt really bad. I reminded Rhayes that he was pathetic in terms of his worldview. He told me that he's "trying" to change. I'm glad. BTW, he told me that Jesus Camp was tool of Satan.
**************
Support the Spread of Open Society and Capitalism around the World. Do it for the Children.
Consider this statement by th
February 23, 2007 - 18:42 ET by winston smithBig Carbon Foot Print!!!!
February 23, 2007 - 19:11 ET by nicksmith112Will Big Al and his entourage be flying Private Jet or commercial (First Class Of course..lol) to the Oscars???
Come on Al you invented the internet....why not Skype the Oscars, save the planet....hehehehe...lol.
self award
February 23, 2007 - 19:32 ET by m1xramIf you control the awards you're not subject to any rules. You can make stuff up as you go along. Here's a 2006 scenario:
You guys remember that one right? Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules!
Let's hope he doesn't lose! G
February 23, 2007 - 23:31 ET byLet's hope he doesn't lose! Gosh, I don't think they allow for recounts for an Oscar. Do they? ~Debra...
Let's hope he does lose. Th
February 24, 2007 - 01:15 ET by MikeBLet's hope he does lose. The resulting litigation would result in much mirth and hilarity on the part of anyone in the center and on the right.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
mirth –noun 1.gaiety or
February 24, 2007 - 01:27 ET bymirth –noun 1.gaiety or jollity, esp. when accompanied by laughter: the excitement and mirth of the holiday season. 2.amusement or laughter: He was unable to conceal his mirth.
hi·lar·i·ty –noun 1.cheerfulness; merriment; mirthfulness. 2.boisterous gaiety or merriment. __________________________________________________________________________________
Normally, I do not like to have to look up more than one word to understand a post, but this one was worth it.
::: Laughing ::: I see your point... and yes... It would be a riot.. :o)
It is a shame science is sque
March 8, 2007 - 14:55 ET by schmidtIt is a shame science is squelched with this administration.