White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, NBC’s David Gregory, Newsweek’s Richard Wolffe, and others gathered on Tuesday at the National Press Club to discuss a variety of issues including media reporting of political events (video available here).
As the conversation ensued, Gregory made the following observations:
Because it- it's the Internet, and the blogs, that have really used this White House press conference to somehow support positions out in America- political views- and they- and they- uh- they will clip, and digitize portions of these briefings to fit into their particular argument and I think people try to divine motives of the questioners and- and certainly draw conclusions about, uh, the answers, or- or non-answers, uh, based on their, their, their own political views.
Snow then gave his own rather negative impression of blogs:
I'll occasionally punch it up and it's amazing, you get this wonderful imaginative hateful stuff that comes flying out, and, I think one of the, the, the, maybe one of the, the most important takeaways is, it's the classic old line "not only should you not believe your own press you probably shouldn't believe your opposition blogs either."
Seems like sound advice. What follows is a partial transcript courtesy of Crooks and Liars.
David Gregory: To assertively lay out the President's case in a way that perhaps hadn't been done before you were brought on. So the President recognized that "I need a forceful advocate who can be seen on television and who can, who can seize that platform." At the same time there's many of you watching. If you're watching on C-Span or, or you're here tonight. You wanna watch not only the give and take but the topics to be addressed and see the only representative of the White House on a daily basis, if the President does not speak, say what he wants to say but also be responsive to members of the press. And whether or not you think we accurately are, uh or, are justly represent the views of the American people that's, that's very much something that's up for debate. But it's a useful, it is a useful exercise. There's also a downside to it. If people think, you know, people are playing to the cameras, I can't control what Tony does. But, um (laughter) but I will just say this: if you-if you-if you think that, that, um, you know, people (laughs) um-
Tony Snow: (laughing) Damn right (unintelligible)
David Gregory: No, but look, I mean I-I-I hope that some of my colleagues here will-will vouch for this but I mean-
Audience Member: I agree.
David Gregory: Some of these exchanges-
Audience Member: I agree.
David Gregory: I haven't made the point yet. (laughter) Uh, that uh, that- no but some-
Audience Member: Calm down…
David Gregory: some of the exchanges can be just as heated. I mean you- you described heated- going back to the Ford administration. So whether it's a gaggle, whether it's a briefing, a lot of, I think, the, the questioning is the same. That's my view, I can speak from my own experiences and having tense exchanges off camera and off camera um, I've had them both. So, I think that um, I think there's utility and I also think there is a downside and I alluded to this a moment ago. I think that politics and political coverage has become so polarized in this country and in part because everybody- McCurry worried about cable news, with the cameras- that was- that seems like a hundred years ago. Because it- it's the Internet, and the blogs, that have really used this White House press conference to somehow support positions out in America- political views- and they- and they- uh- they will clip, and digitize portions of these briefings to fit into their particular argument and I think people try to divine motives of the questioners and- and certainly draw conclusions about, uh, the answers, or- or non-answers, uh, based on their, their, their own political views.
Tony Snow: You know you raise uh, I'm glad you raised the blog issue, because, uh, I think they'll be kind of a generational divide, uh, do either of you guys look at blogs much?
Panel Member: I write a few, but I don't look at them much.
(laughter)
Tony Snow: And my guess is this side of the room is- looks more at blogs. Um, you look at blogs, right?
Panel Member: I look at blogs. I'm all for blogs, I'm all for the First Amendment, I think people oughta be empowered to write what they want.
Tony Snow: Yeah. Well, I think what's happened is we, we've got this new Democratic age of the media but you're right, it actually- I'll- I'll occasionally punch it up and it's amazing, you get this wonderful imaginative hateful stuff that comes flying out, and, I think one of the, the, the, maybe one of the, the most important takeaways is, it's the classic old line "not only should you not believe your own press you probably shouldn't believe your opposition blogs either". What do you think, Richard?
Richard Wolffe: Yeah, uh, well, uh yeah, I totally agree. I, I, uh- David hit on a good point here that a lot of the blogs are trying to divine motive and bias. There seems to be this sort of- the witch hunt that's out there. A lot of the blogs are, are, are unduly devoted to media criticism which is itself kind of interesting given all the things you could comment on. Uh, but look, as you can tell from my accent, I, I'm not actually from here, and, uh-(laughter) from the Bronx, actually. (Laughter) But, uh, but in my home country, uh, what used to be my home country, you don't have to, uh, try and guess what someone's political bias is in the press, cause the press is divided up neatly according to partisan views. And, it, uh, in my humble view, I think the press here does a fantastic job of adhering to journalistic standards in covering politics in general. And the, um, the interesting thing in, in looking at the political coverage as people try to guess what we do is, is that they want us to play a role that really isn't our role. Our- our role is to ask questions and get information. But it- the press briefing isn't Prime Minister's question time. It's not a chance for the opposition to take on the government and grill them to a point where they hand- throw their hands up and surrender. Now, obviously there's a contentious spirit there- we're trying to get information, but, it's not a political exercise, it's a journalistic exercise, and I think often the blogs are looking for us to be political advocates, more than journalistic ones.
Tony Snow: Another sign of the times, my Blackberry just went off-
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I don't think David Gregory r
February 21, 2007 - 14:48 ET by Conservative in the ArtsI don't think David Gregory really knew why the audience was laughing. Boy, did he step in it that time!
Gregory is babbling like a drunk. Um...
February 21, 2007 - 14:56 ET by acaiguanaGregory is babbling like a drunk. Um...
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Snow
February 21, 2007 - 15:39 ET by iveseenitallI like Tony Snow. But , if you're reading this Tony, you're wrong on this one. Snow seems to be joining the elite here. Many "average" Americans are much smarter and more educated than most of the people who call themselves "journalists". I, a well-educated and intelligent average American, have very little respect for any of them. I am at least as on top of the news as they are. I agree, many of the left-wing blogs are silly, but are not to be dismissed the way these guys appear to be doing with their snide laughter. And as for the fellow who claims, in effect, that there's no liberal bias in the media--what planet is he on?
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
He's not babbling like a drun
February 21, 2007 - 15:46 ET by mattmHe's not babbling like a drunk, he's babbling like a guilty person.
It seems obvious to me that he's trying to argue against the idea that he and his MSM colleagues have a Liberal political agenda rather than a purely journalistic one.
As for Snow, he's demonstrating the problem with the Washington clique culture. He probably knows that the cut-and-paste accusation of Gregory's applies at least equally to the MSM, but he doesn't want to step on anyone's toes, so he let's him get away with it....
Gregory is one of those thi
February 21, 2007 - 15:37 ET by Right2thePointGregory is one of those things that casual viewers point at and giggle.
Why does anybody even take him serious?
I know they don't, they only point at him as a hood ornament on the way to a very bad crash.
Darn Right!
February 21, 2007 - 15:57 ET by bushwasrightMan I hate that Gregory's attitude. The next thing you know he'll be asking questions about why a major Republican party donor has been charged with sending money to terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.
http://www.guardian....
Why won't liberals stay out of our business! Where a Republican donates his money is their own business!!
(hi hater -- ho-hum it's an
February 21, 2007 - 16:10 ET by sarcasmo(hi hater -- ho-hum it's another "major" party minor-scandal.) Do you agree that the TV coverage of Dennis Kucinich pretty-much serves as a control-group for TV non-coverage of Ron Paul?
JMR
Hater or FatesWeb (whichever) long time no see.
February 21, 2007 - 16:13 ET by acaiguanaHater or FatesWeb (whichever) long time no see.
We haven't missed you.
How did you sneak back in? Did you lie to do it?
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Dem campaign contributions
February 21, 2007 - 16:30 ET by Eric Turneryou're so right. Just like it shouldn't matter where the dems get their campaign contributions from!
Or what they give up to get i
February 21, 2007 - 17:27 ET by mattmOr what they give up to get it...
BTW Where's that Mark Rich character nowadays?
Yes, the Rich and Gore storie
February 21, 2007 - 20:34 ET by bushwasrightYes, the Rich and Gore stories were bad, but I like how none of these comments are acknowledging the actual story I mentioned. And there is slim moral equivalency between those two examples. Pardoning an embezzler and some improper campaign contributions are not the same as someone who was named by the National Republican Senatorial Committee as an ``Inner Circle Member for Life'' and appointed to the NRCC's ``White House Business Advisory Committee'' has been found out to be a sponsor of radical Islamic terrorism. Sheesh, it OK to admit you’ve got wackos in your party folks. May I suggest pulling your heads out of yours asses for a few hours and learning to be objective instead of lickspittle yes-men for your party 24-7?
Since you brought it up twi
February 21, 2007 - 21:51 ET by Right2thePointSince you brought it up twice so it is soooooooooo important to you I will address this.
Could you think for a moment that a terrorist financer might be flying a false flag or is that to much of a stretch for you to reach?
Roger's Rules of Liberalism illustrated here
February 21, 2007 - 21:56 ET by Eric TurnerBWR is giving perfect illustrations of Roger's 1st, 2nd, and 6th Rules of Liberalism perfectly, and to an extent the 3rd Rule as well...
Not proud to be a Leftist?
February 21, 2007 - 22:01 ET by UnsaneRefresh my memory: do any of those rules cover the refusal to be honest (and proud) about being a Leftist? Why else would he/she come up with a screen name like "bushwasright" and then smear Leftist garbage all over the thread?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
unsane, Left wing nuts cannot be honest about who they are.
February 21, 2007 - 22:05 ET by acaiguanaunsane, Left wing nuts cannot be honest about who they are.
You know that my man.
And bushwasright is one of our returnee regular haterettes (ht to Roger) on the site.
I'm sure of that. Too many of them tonight for it to be a coincidence.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Of course!
February 21, 2007 - 22:11 ET by Unsaneaca, you know that I know. I was just checking which of Roger's Rules of Liberalism cover that territory. I am positive that he codified that aspect of being a Leftist.
:^)
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
A new Rule for Liberals?
February 21, 2007 - 22:16 ET by Eric TurnerYou know I have noticed that a lot as well. Trying to get a liberal (or leftist) to admit they are a liberal (or leftist) is like trying to nail water to the wall. They want to call themselves anything but - moderate; independent, non-political, etc.
Be proud of what you are! Admit it! Embrace it. Be the ball!
Roger's Rules of Liberalism
February 21, 2007 - 22:09 ET by Eric TurnerRoger's Rules
of Liberalism
1. Accuse the Right of doing exactly
what the Left is doing.
2. Keep repeating something over and
over and it will eventually become the Truth.
3. Free speech only is permitted
when the message is agreeable to the Left.
4. Liberalism always generates the
opposite of its stated intent.
5. The wealth of a region is
inversely proportional to the amount of liberals in power in that region.
6. In America, people are innocent until
proven guilty. Unless they are Republican.
There is also a corollary to the 1st Rule - When confronted with truth about the liberal stance that is contrary to popular public opinion they will deny, deny, deny.
A few crucial points
February 21, 2007 - 21:54 ET by UnsaneIf only you would realize for 1/1000th of a second that for some of us, we have NO political party. But let's not let that stop you from making broad-based assumptions.
Nice to see you cite The Guardian, probably the closest thing the English language has to Правда.
"Lickspittle"? What are you, an Aussie?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
bushwasright - you are correct...Now, the Democrat House.
February 21, 2007 - 22:00 ET by acaiguanabushwasright - you are correct...Now, the Democrat House.
There's a buncha guys who sponsor radical Islamic terrorism for sure. And they do it nearly every day. Have been for nearly 6 years.
If we could just get these guys in jail.
They are a little more than just 'Inner Circle Members for Life'.
Why just the other day they passed a resolution specifically designed to attack the morale of our troops, the country's backing of the troops in the field and their Commander in Chief; and to give the enemy comfort and security to know if they just wait...
Maybe we'll quit and they will win.
These folks are so invested in losing the war, that one of them, John Murtha wants to 'bleed' our troops to death by not giving them the training or the equipment they need to win.
Whenever someone mentions 'winning' to these guys they cry, "We've already lost!
So, yeah, this slimeball should go to jail. I 100% agree with you. I find it a little hard to use him as a baseball bat to beat Republicans about the head with since you Democrat cut and runners have an entire section of the Constitutional Governement, the House of Representatives, hand in hand and in lockstep with the terrorists to lose the war in Iraq.
Good job there focusing on this idiot.
bushisright.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Yet Another Troll
February 21, 2007 - 22:14 ET by emjem24Where's your proof, BWR? You're so transparent. Be honest about who you really are and stop hiding behind catchy, little call signs. You're yet another troll just admit it.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
The Guardian??? LMAO!!!!!!!
February 21, 2007 - 22:38 ET by gfrrmanThe Guardian??? LMAO!!!!!!!
I saw this and I really enjoy
February 21, 2007 - 15:50 ET by sembyI saw this and I really enjoyed this.
April was there and she said that "she's so sensitive" when anyone criticizes her; but I tell you she comes with a bias agenda every single time; she's so pathetic, the all-time victim
She asked Snow this question yesterday in the press briefing:
Q Tony, in the wake of what's happening at Walter Reed, what lengths has the administration gone to, to prevent another Vietnam scenario? Because many have made comments about, you know, this could wind up being another Vietnam, and, indeed, we're in the situation where many of the troops are not being taken care of properly. Analogy been floating around there? By who? Maybe April is biased in her opinions. She is constantly insuiting that the President is a racist; maybe she needs to look in the mirror!
MR. SNOW: Well, wait a minute. First, April, there are thousands and thousands who, in fact, have been cared for. The assumption that somehow everybody has gone through and not received appropriate care simply isn't the case. It is important to make sure that everybody gets -- resort to treatment. To try to whomp this up -- to try to come up with a Vietnam analogy is just --
Q I'm not trying to come up, that analogy has been floating out there for a while. And that's the question that I'm asking you, to what lengths is this administration going to, to prevent that kind of scenario?
Unbelievable questions. She is so unqualified to be a journalist it is laughable. I guess someone felt sorry for her and gave her a "pity" job!
oh david
February 21, 2007 - 15:51 ET by foolnomorea man of the people,
yes, you are one of the chosen elitist's,
I dont think the scarecrow ba
February 21, 2007 - 15:54 ET by bassndudeI dont think the scarecrow babbled that bad. David have any idea what he was saying or why they were laughing? Need any more proof this man is brainless?
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
DEAR GREGORY AND TONY,We don'
February 21, 2007 - 16:32 ET by tracheostomyDEAR GREGORY AND TONY,
We don't have to "divine" anything.
We're not reading vague; obscure heiroglyphs or tea leaves here. We have entire paragraphs of direct quotes; no need to cherry-pick or parse as our liberal friends are wont to do. The motives of a public speaker are much more clearly delineated than they were a generation ago.
To sum up: SUBTLETY IS A LOST ART AMONG US ALL!
-PJ
Tony Snow
February 21, 2007 - 17:35 ET by CellaThere is no one smoother than Tony Snow. What an addition to the public discourse. He could read the phone book orally and I would like it.
But I was disappointed in one line of comments. Tony asked about hate mail.
Certainly he has received more positive feedback than many others. So it begs the question: what does he think of all the emails of affirmation? I would like to have heard a discussion about that.
I saw almost all of this blat
February 21, 2007 - 23:38 ET by bigtimerI saw almost all of this blather on C-Span...
I truly wonder what, who, when, why, and where... put the guru of spin with the dem's/ leftists out there....I found it all rather nauseating.....disappointing...and so obvious, which is never going to work with this compassionate BS with the leftist side of the media...never.
Just my opinion.
Of course.