An Inconvenient Truth: Global Warming is All About The Money

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

So, you think the global warming alarmists are actually concerned about the environment or the future of the planet? Think again, for a recent funds request from the World Bank to solve this “problem” should clue you in as to what is really going on with those advancing theories emanating from junk science.

As reported by Reuters (emphasis mine throughout): “The World Bank wants to breathe life back into a mooted $10 billion-plus fund to combat climate change which would need public and private sector backing, its Chief Scientist Robert Watson told Reuters on Tuesday.”

What’s the money needed for, you ask:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Tackling climate change is in many ways an energy problem -- and there are big up-front costs to install the energy saving kit and other technologies that would curb emissions of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels.

Developing countries especially need to clean up -- or de-carbonise -- their energy, given their emissions are seen overtaking rich nations soon after 2010, and because they are installing huge new capacity to power their breakneck growth.

Funding for poor countries now includes the Global Environment Facility (GEF), which has 30-plus donor countries, and carbon trading under the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012, but these are not nearly enough, said Watson.

The World Bank's idea is for a fund which will lend money on soft terms to poor nations to help them cut emissions, getting in return interest payments plus carbon credits equivalent to the amount of the emissions reductions, which the fund could then sell on.

Getting the picture? Think our media will push for our tax dollars to fund this kind of a program, or any other that comes down the pike?

In the end, folks, global warming hysteria is all about taking money from wealthy countries and allowing international organizations to manage and redistribute them. Saving the planet is just the ruse necessary to convince the addle-minded that it makes sense.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Your last paragraph is right

Your last paragraph is right on the mark, Noel.  And that's why groups like ANSER and other socialist political covers have taken up the GW mantra, and why China, the world's worst polluter, is exempt from Kyoto rules.

Fits with my notion that the

Fits with my notion that the Democrats were premature in going with "the world is flat."   More politically accurate to just see the world as "flattening" and the President's policies in many ways just early good defensive plays to keep trend from reversing.  We no longer have the cold war to justify/excuse taking money from our rich to fund affirmative economic actions just within our boarders.  The inconvenient truth about the "flattening" of the world and US being the primary super power whose model is being challenged or borrowed around the world.  And how is Paul Wolfowitz these days?

It's my understanding that

It's my understanding that the "greenhouse gas" with the most impact is water vapor- emitted by oceans, rivers, lakes, and just about every living creature (plants, esp). I seem to remember that a single mature oak tree can give off at least 50 gallons of water a day. So, when are we going to flog all these offenders into submission? Do these people realize how utterly transparent they are? Here we witness evolution in action- the snake-oil and patent-medicine peddler morphing into the AGW activist.

I have to disagree...I see gl

I have to disagree...I see global warming zealots as religious zealots..so making the claim its all about the money is akin to churches only saying their sermons to collect the tithes.  There maybe a few who are solely motivated by the money and power, but overall they believe the lies.

I am against the World Bank funding any more social type program

I am against the World Bank funding any more social type programs.

I have always been against it.  The world bank has a terrible record in its efforts to 'help'.  The World Bank is run by a rather ridiculous group of economic idiots.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Losing the Ideology

I have been mulling this over here and there for a year or so, and I think I've gotten some good (but vague) idea - at least I can't formulate it well in words.

I started by saying offhand on my blog that Global Warming was clearly going to be the latest Homeless Crisis.  I thought it was cute, but something about it stuck in my mind as if telling me there was more to it than being glib.

Now, I think it does connect to the whole program and goes back to other thoughts I've had about the Cold War and post-Cold War.

The same people and entities pushing this Global Warming crusade are the same ones who pushed the Homeless Crisis crusade.

And we can start to get the bigger picture if we think about the similarities in who was being attacked in each and what they might have been connected to before the Homeless Crisis.

What I have as a working hypothesis that what we have witnessed is this:

after these people had to admit defeat in their aspiratoins to believe (and convince others) that Communism was a viable, ethical alternative to the ills of industrializated capitalism --- once they were forced to admit the Soviet Union, Cuba, China, North Korea, the Eastern Bloc, and so on were much worse off both economically and ethically than what they had been blasting for decades in the US and those who immitated us ----

they decided to drop the ideological debate.

They decided to go Derridian - rather than offering up alternatives and a sound ideological defense for those alternatives -

they viewed their job as just to de-construct Western industrialized capitalism.

Enter - the Homeless Crisis.  This crusade was launched by the same groups at around the time the Soviet Union was collapsing and it looked like the evil American Empire of fat cats and military industrial complex was going to shine in glory of not just being the winner - but proving that its way provided a better life for its people and was so much LESS oppressive.

How could such a nation claim this victory if --- despite its riches, it was so easy for even solid working class families to end up sleeping their cars if they had just a little financial hiccup?

Then enter Clinton, and as Bernard Goldberg has noted well, suddenly the Homeless Crisis went poof......as I guess these groups thought the early attempt to solical medicine was a sign of good things to come (which didn't).

But, regardless, then enter Bush, and Global Warming rises up full throttle to do what? 

Attack the very same entities these same groups have been attacking going back to the 1930s at least:  big business, industrialization, capitalism, and conservatives who support them.

All that is missing in the committment to a real social ideology - meaning a firm, complete system of thought from which they work.

And as someone noted above, they seem to be actually trying to turn Global Warming into an expansive ideology/religion.

The World Bank is just using

The World Bank is just using this a ruse to fund more development projects in the third world.  I don't have a problem with investment in the third world per say but these governments tend to default on the loans because the project was marginal in the first place or the country misspent their own money to the point of not making payments.  Any investment anywhere must have an economic basis demonstrating a reasonable return on investment.

Let's face it, the real reason why the World Bank is getting involved is the restrictive national economic policies of third world countries through incompetence, taxation or corruption that makes business investment a looser.  Socialism and central planning by government doesn't work.  Why do businesses and countries around the world invest in the US?  We are business friendly, change your tune and you will have dollars flocking to invest.  So here's a thought for the World Bank, tell the prospective country to create a free market business zone using US laws as a guideline, guarantee repatriation of profits and allow only commercial enterprises to design, build and operate energy projects with an iron clad guarantee against nationalization.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

dscott - good luck. First you gotta replace 90% of the staff.

dscott - good luck.  First you gotta replace 90% of the staff.

Get rid of the political 'favor' positions.  Get rid of the 'quota' positions.  Get rid of the 'social' structure building requirements.  Get rid of the Gunnar Myrdal economists (that may have changed, but for the worse, maybe Rostow?).

Don't hold your breath.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

That's why I made the suggest

That's why I made the suggestion to highlight the problem, the World Bank will never do it because of vested interests of all the people skimming along the way.  We all know what "works", the fact that World Bank insists on doing everything but what is known to work speaks to their own corruption.  Not one penny should go the World Bank, let alone the UN, handing out cash walking down the street to complete strangers in a third world country would do more good than the World Bank or the UN.  Handouts however are bad.

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius

The world bank, takes our mon

The world bank, takes our money and gives it away. It is not a profit making enity. Paul Wolfowitz is the president of the world bank. Jimmy Carter saw fit to send him to the pentagon. If JC liked him, you know he is a socialist at heart. Seeing as he is willing to jump on the energy and global warming band wagon, to gleen more money from us, the USA, all for the sake of distributing that money to the poor countries is a communist act, IMHO that is.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Noel's conspiracy theory fits

Noel's conspiracy theory fits in well with his denial of science.

Hey, throaty, let you out of the room for a while, huh?

Hey, throaty, let you out of the room for a while, huh?

Have you thought about one-liner writing for Henny Youngman?  I know he's dead but that shouldn't bother you.

Here's a hint.

Getting on a plane, I told the ticket lady, "Send one of my bags to New York, send one to Los Angeles, and send one to Miami." She said, "We can't do that!" I told her, "You did it last week!"

I was just in London - there is a 6 hour time difference. I'm still confused. When I go to dinner, I feel sexy. When I go to bed, I feel hungry.

The food on the plane was fit for a king. "Here, King!"

ACA

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

acaiguana, Had to laugh, th

acaiguana, Had to laugh, thanks for that link which I will pass on.

D

Want your elected reps to know what you think? Go to Congress.org, it's real easy.

You can also send faxes to your reps about immigration from Nu

not the denial of science-thr

not the denial of science-throaty-the actual reliance on science and real scientific method; most global-warming hysteria massages science to promote a philosophy of revolutionary economic and change of the way humanity lives to something radically different.  This is their ultimate aim.  

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere"          -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph

Someone who thinks any disagr

Someone who thinks any disagreement on AGW is paid propaganda from Exxon, shouldn't talk about conspiracy theory.

Nor should someone who thinks there is no scientific disagreement talk about denial.

Throatpecker, denial is your middle name.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

Ever heard that it's not para

Ever heard that it's not paranoia if they are all really out to get you?

The $ from fossil fuels is well documented. It doesn't prove anything, of course. It's the weak arguments--like comparing CO2 emissions from all history with human emissions and the like.

Oh oh...throatwobbler the Global Warming Cult Member

Well wobbler, at least you finally found a cult in which you feel comfortable. Just think, it has an Apostle...Al Gore...a creed...it's all man's fault and probably greedy conservatives but not liberals who fly on private jets and celebrities that drive giant SUV's (remember the heads of the cult never have to live by what they teach)....it preaches an apocalyptic end coming soon...it demands a radical change in the way people under this cult system live and magically like all cults it is a reduction in personal comfort and convenience while the cult leaders remain unchanged in their lives except for a few token acts...WOW wobbler...just your kind of unbriddled hypocrisy and a CULT to boot. Glad you found your place in The First Church of Global Warming Cult.

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

Ah, more conspiracy theories.

Ah, more conspiracy theories.....all those scientists are a cult now.

Ah, more throaty insanity.

Ah, more throaty insanity.

Actually, it isn't a 'conspiracy' theory.  It is a psychological construct.  Designed to explain irrational beliefs in stupid ideas.  Like, for example, you.

And all scientists are human.  I can understand your not understanding science on that basis alone.

ACA

...

Quoted from:  'Acaiguana Notes from the Bomb Shelter' (soon to be a movie at theaters near you)

Now Aca. Throatpecker is scie

Now Aca. Throatpecker is scientifically challenged. He doesn't understand the two basic errors in science. I seriously question his ability to understand scientific constructs. Probably thinks Talcot Parsons was a minister. And thinks the sociology of movements deals with women going to the ladies room together.

If observed facts of undoubted accuracy will not fit any of the alternatives it leaves open, the system itself is in need of reconstruction.
Talcott Parsons

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

Yep. I've seen your documenta

Yep. I've seen your documentation. I'm really impressed.

Loosen the tin foil in your hat.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

Thanks for proving my point.&

Thanks for proving my point.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

It must really keep you up at

It must really keep you up at night knowing that oil is organic

Shouldn't you be humping a tr

Shouldn't you be humping a tree?