GMA Anchor Slams Insurance Industry Profits; Highlights Calls for More Regulation

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

On the Tuesday edition of “Good Morning America,” host Robin Roberts slammed the insurance industry for daring to make a profit in the years since Hurricane Katrina. She also used the segment as a vehicle to call for more government regulations. The piece, combatively titled “GMA Gets It Done: Getting Answers” suggested the subjective, advocacy oriented slant that the program would take. (Additionally, last week, Diane Sawyer previewed the multi-day story, describing it as “a call to arms.”)

Roberts repeatedly took insurance company representative Bob Hartwig to task for the industry’s “record profits.” A sampling of Roberts’ hostile questioning can be found below:

Robin Roberts: “When people who have lost everything, who are in dispute with various insurance companies and they see the amount of money that-- the profit that is being made in such a year, these home owners scratch their heads a little bit. Do you understand?”

Roberts: “Though people find it hard to believe during such a devastating year, you still make a significant increase in your profit. And they’re saying, ‘Good grief, we trusted you.’”

Roberts: “You know that rings hollow, what you just said, to so many people. They don't believe that anymore.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Roberts began the segment, which aired at 7:45am on February 20, by recounting some very real, and obviously sad, cases of Katrina victims who have had problems with their insurance companies. However, when she talked with Mr. Hartwig, President of the Insurance Information Institute, the ABC host seemed more interested in how wrong it was for the industry to be making profits during such a difficult time:

Roberts: “Paul and Julie Leonard whose home suffered $100,000 in damages have also sought help in court. The judge in their first trial ruled their Nationwide policy did not cover storm surge damages caused by the hurricane. They are appealing and so far they have received only $1200. Still, the insurance industry maintains for the most part, Katrina claims have been settled amicably. Bob Hartwig represents the insurance industry, the major insurance companies we contacted, declined to be interviewed.”

Bob Hartwig (President, Insurance Information Institute): “The insurance industry responded admirably to the unprecedented disaster that was Hurricane Katrina. Through that disaster, insurers paid $1.74 million claims valued at $41 billion dollars.”

Roberts: “But despite weathering the worst national disaster in history, critics point out, the insurance companies made record profits in 2005, $49 billion, in fact, growing to $60 billion last year. When people who have lost everything, who are in dispute with various insurance companies and they see the amount of money that-- the profit that is being made in such a year, these home owners scratch their heads a little bit. Do you understand?”

Hartwig: “Oh, I understand. But insurers have earned profits in other states, in other types of insurance. None of the profits in 2005, for example, were earned in the state of Mississippi. They were earned on auto insurance in Ohio, or workman compensation coverage in Oregon.”

Roberts: “The record profits, the reports of denied claims, have some in Congress calling foul.”

Gene Taylor: “Their behavior is just shameful.”

Roberts: “Congressman Gene Taylor's home was among those destroyed and whose insurance claim was denied. He wants the federal government to have more control over an industry he says has gone out of its way to deny claims. Congress will hold hearings on the issue next week.

After allowing Democratic Congressman Taylor, whose party affiliation was only mentioned in an onscreen graphic, not by Roberts, to push for more government control over the insurance agency, the co-host proceeded to focus on industry profits and repeatedly asked the same question:

Taylor (D-Mississippi): “If you’re going to tell a federal judge that can't read his policy, if you’re going to tell a U.S. Senator who is a graduate of the University of Mississippi Law School that they can't read policy, what kind of chance does an average Joe have?”

Roberts: “Though people find it hard to believe during such a devastating year, you still make a significant increase in your profit. And they’re saying, ‘Good grief, we trusted you.’”

Hartwig: “And insurers are an industry that has responded compassionately to the individuals who were affected by those storms. Insurance is the best, most efficient means for recovery from natural disasters. That has been demonstrated time and time again.”

Roberts: “You know that rings hollow, what you just said, to so many people. They don't believe that anymore.” Hartwig: “Well, the proof is, if you travel throughout the region, as you have and as I have, you can see rebuilding of homes and businesses, hundreds of thousands of them.”

 Roberts: “With a court date later this year, the Beckhams hope they will prevail and join in the rebuilding.”

Jim Beckham: “I have never sued anyone in my life up until this point. But I feel like that's the only way I'm going to get what's owed me.”

Roberts: “And that's a feeling shared by many in this region here in New Orleans and along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. And full disclosure here, to be fair, you are understanding [sic] that my family was very much affected by Hurricane Katrina. Our home in Pass Christian, Mississippi, my mother's home was insured and she did receive payment for wind damage and further payment for other damages is still pending.”

First off, it seems as though GMA anchors are tougher on the insurance industry then they are on dictators. This is, after all, a program which spent the past two weeks airing chummy, not-very-challenging interviews with Middle Eastern dictators. Can anyone imagine co-host Diane Sawyer essentially calling Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a liar and telling him that his statements “ring hollow?”

Secondly, although Ms. Roberts has discussed her family’s connection to Hurricane Katrina in the past, shouldn’t a professional journalist report such a personal, emotional link up front and not leave it to the very end of the segment? Ken Shepherd, a colleague over at the Business and Media Institute, picked up on this breach in a Febuary 20 column:

"'And full disclosure here, to be fair, you are understanding [sic] that my family was very much affected by Hurricane Katrina,' Roberts admitted at the end of her report. 'Our home in Pass Christian, Mississippi, my mother's home was insured and she did receive payment for wind damage and further payment for other damages is still pending,' the Gulf Coast native concluded her report from New Orleans.

The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics urges journalists to 'Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.' Roberts’ personal interest in the story was obviously quite real, and her story was just as obviously slanted."

A transcript of the February 20 segment follows:

ABC Graphic: “GMA Gets it Done: Getting Answers: Insurance Company Battles”

 Robin Roberts: “As part of our series, ‘GMA Gets It Done,’ we have promised to get you answers in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. You know, we've heard from so many viewers who have asked, do the people here in this area, here in New Orleans and along the Mississippi Gulf Coast, do they feel that they have been forgotten by the rest of the country? And the answer is, many of them do. And part of the problem is, the reason they feel that way is because of the legal limbo that they are in. They are still waiting for the insurance companies to do what they thought they were promised to do, and that is cover them. And we found a lot of frustration.”

Unidentified Family #1: “When you lose everything that you own, you know, you're relying on your insurance company to help you pick up the pieces.”

Unidentified Family #2: “If we just got some money from the insurance, and be able to get settled, we wouldn't have to go through this prolonged stress.”

Roberts: “A year and a half after Katrina battered the Gulf Coast, thousands of residents are still in the midst of a storm, a legal storm. All that's left of Jim and Jody Beckham’s once half million dollar home is this concrete slab. They lost everything.”

Jim Beckham: “We used to sit up on the balcony on the outside and watch the fireworks.”

Roberts: “Loyal State Farm policy holders for 35 years, the Beckhams have not received a cent from their all-risk policy, which turns out excludes flood damage. State Farm denied their claim, concluding the damages were from water and not related to the 140 mile per-hour winds of Katrina. Something they and their lawyers say were not told by their adjustor who examined their house.”

Jim Beckham: “I never once heard him say a word about water. It was always the wind destroyed this and the wind destroyed that.”

Roberts: “Paul and Julie Leonard whose home suffered $100,000 in damages have also sought help in court. The judge in their first trial ruled their Nationwide policy did not cover storm surge damages caused by the hurricane. They are appealing and so far they have received only $1200. Still, the insurance industry maintains for the most part, Katrina claims have been settled amicably. Bob Hartwig represents the insurance industry, the major insurance companies we contacted, declined to be interviewed.”

Bob Hartwig (President, Insurance Information Institute): “The insurance industry responded admirably to the unprecedented disaster that was Hurricane Katrina. Through that disaster, insurers paid $1.74 million claims valued at $41 billion dollars.”

Roberts: “But despite weathering the worst national disaster in history, critics point out, the insurance companies made record profits in 2005, $49 billion, in fact, growing to $60 billion last year.When people who have lost everything, who are in dispute with various insurance companies and they see the amount of money that--the profit that is being made in such a year, these home owners scratch their heads a little bit. Do you understand?”

Hartwig: “Oh, I understand. But insurers have earned profits in other states in other types of insurance. None of the profits in 2005, for example, were earned in the state of Mississippi. They were earned on auto insurance in Ohio, or workman compensation coverage in Oregon.”

Roberts: “The record profits, the reports of denied claims, have some in Congress calling foul.”

 Gene Taylor: “Their behavior is just shameful.”

Roberts: “Congressman Gene Taylor's home was among those destroyed and whose insurance claim was denied. He wants the federal government to have more control over an industry he says has gone out of its way to deny claims. Congress will hold hearings on the issue next week.”

Taylor (D-Mississippi): “If you’re going to tell a federal judge that can't read his policy, if you’re going to tell a U.S. Senator who is a graduate of the University of Mississippi Law School that they can't read policy, what kind of chance does an average Joe have?”

Roberts: “Though people find it hard to believe during such a devastating year, you still make a significant increase in your profit. And they’re saying, ‘Good grief, we trusted you.’”

Hartwig: “And insurers are an industry that has responded compassionately to the individuals who were affected by those storms. Insurance is the best, most efficient means for recovery from natural disasters. That has been demonstrated time and time again.”

Roberts: “You know that rings hollow, what you just said, to so many people. They don't believe that anymore.”

Hartwig: “Well, the proof is, if you travel throughout the region, as you have and as I have, you can see rebuilding of homes and businesses, hundreds of thousands of them.”

Roberts: “With a court date later this year, the Beckhams hope they will prevail and join in the rebuilding.”

Jim Beckham: “I have never sued anyone in my life up until this point. But I feel like that's the only way I'm going to get what's owed me.”

Roberts: “And that's a feeling shared by many in this region here in New Orleans and along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. And full disclosure here, to be fair, you are understanding [sic] that my family was very much affected by Hurricane Katrina. Our home in Pass Christian, Mississippi, my mother's home was insured and she did receive payment for wind damage and further payment for other damages is still pending.”

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Once-again, Reason provides

Once-again, Reason provides superior coverage of the issue. I just wish someone-else would notice the flagrant antilibertarian bias issue, since in this case media bias is affecting not just the Large-L Libertarian party, but instead attempting to affect the future direction of the REPUBLICAN party, by blatantly trying to silence certain voices I've been telling everyone here that they wanted to silence for a LONG time around here... IOW, "I told you so."
JMR

100 billion plus on Katrina

Weren't the liberals whining about a 600 million dollar embassy in Iraq - the largest in the world they cried over and over again...

from WH. gov

[ Veterans: $600 million to rebuild the VA hospital in New Orleans that served more than 40,000 veterans in 2005. ]

That's $ 15,000 per veteran just to RE-build the facility, in one state of the 50, with one subset of vets, at the 600 million dollar mark.

LOL - the libs whine way too much.

No, that embassy and even s

No, that embassy and even spending in general (for once!) aren't my whine here. I'm instead whining about a form of antilibertarian mediabias (which nobody here has denied, BTW, so apparently I'm makin' a damn-good case) that is possibly AFFECTING THE IDEOLOGICAL DIRECTION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ITSELF, NOT THE LIBERTARIANS!!! I have basically seen silence, aside from your reply (which frankly doesn't address the bias in question). What, instead, is apparently concerning the NB masthead? Well, horror of horrors, yet-another comic made another joke about Bush not being able to find his ass with both hands on Leno, and clearly that's some majorly-dangerous mediabias on the comedy-circuit compared to what sarcasmo's talkin' about here in presidential polls & elsewhere (hey, who cares who'll eventually be president next or what he'll do to either grow or shrink big government once he is, "WAAAA! SOME LEFTY MADE ANOTHER "CAN'T FIND HIS ASS" JOKE ON LENO ABOUT DUBYA"!). Misplaced priorities, IMO, but as ye sow so shall ye reap, and that includes ostensibly mediabias busting groups ignoring what's basically big-government-producing antilibertarian mediabias which is likely to negatively effect the size of government by steering the Republican party once-again in the wrong direction...
JMR

We don't know enough about th

We don't know enough about the policy coverages in the cases GMA covered, so I don't want to speculate on those case themselves.

 Usually in such contested settlements, the policy owner either didn't realize that the policy didn't cover damage from 'rising water,' or was aware of the lack of coverage and assumed the risk anyway.  The homeowner policies I've owned weren't hard to understand, usually making it clear that the house and belongings are covered against wind and 'falling water' (e.g. precipitation), but not rising water (floods).

Sometimes it's still up to a court to decide, such the residential dwelling whose roof is blown off by high winds, and the furniture gets damaged by water.  Did the furniture get wet because of the high wind?  Indirectly, yes.  But was it damaged more by the falling rain, or by the rising water collecting in the roofless house and rising?  These are the kinds of things attorneys fight over.

The only good lawyer is a dea

The only good lawyer is a dead lawyer.  Do the world a favor and kill a lawyer today and heap a politician on top. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

The only good lawyer is a dea

The only good lawyer is a dead lawyer.  Do the world a favor and kill a lawyer today and heap a politician on top. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.

What about Matlock or Perry Mason

Dan, what about lawyers like Perry Mason, or Matlock?  I thought they were pretty good lawyers.

"I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane"  Waylon Jennings

PS have you started a Local Lawyer's Fan Club in your community?

We don't know enough about th

(duplicate entry)

We don't know enough about th

(duplicate entry)

Isn't it true that flood insu

Isn't it true that flood insurance is never (or very rarely) sold to cover property located in a flood plain? 

GMA is displaying the typical Leftist attitude that the responsibility for a person's well-being is someone else's; the government's, the insurance company's the HMO, or whatever.

...it is an unhealthy and dangerous attitude to have....it's why the Katrina disaster was worse than it might have been had the people of N.O. been used to fending for themselves rather than relying on the largesse of Mayor Nagin, Rep. Cold-Cash Jefferson and Gov. Blanco...all paternalistic socialists the unfortunate people of N.O. were depending on.

Mattm, not it is not true. 

Mattm, not it is not true.  Insurance companies do not sell flood insurance because of the probability of catastrophic loss.  The premiums for flood insurance by insurance companies would be prohibitive.  Flood Insurance is provided by the Federal Government, and subsidized by your tax dollars.  Flood insurance is sold only (if I am not mistaken) to those who own property in flood plains.  It is certainly required for mortgaged properties in flood plains.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Lenders require flood insur

Lenders require flood insurance if you live in a flood plain. If you pay cash for your home in a flood plain you do not have to but flood insurance. I live outside of a flood plain. I buy flood insurance, its pretty cheap IMO. I live in florida, if a hurricane wind damages my home my regular insurance covers the loss. If the hurrican rain causes damage to my home the flood insurance kicks in and covers the damage. My regular insurance would not cover floods, overflow of bodies of water, rain, spray or any damage caused by water, that is what the flood coverage is for.

While, generally speaking, I

While, generally speaking, I have no great love for insurance companies, Ms. Roberts has the same view that most MSMers hold - that all businesses should function as more efficient versions of government welfare agencies and just give out money  - like it'll never run out.

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Profits

Appears that MSM feels no company should profit except themselves.  Isn't that the reason companies go into business-to make a profit.  In the years insurance companies lose monies, what if policyholders gave them some of the monies they made during that year!  Better yet, why not let the media give all their profits from the coverage of the hurricane & other disasters to the victims.  Bet they didn't give FREE advertising for the coverage they gave!  For people who think that uniform school dress is not constitutional, they feel every business should be a non profit business, that govt should control everything-except control what is on the airways, and that every person in the USA should receive the same salary, no matter what their job is-except themselves of course.  I could rant on & on, but it appears I have!!

I feel government regulatio

I feel government regulation of morning 'entertainment' shows would be a better option to pursue. That and a windfall profits tax on all 'entertainment' profits. After all, a movie is just a couple pounds of plastic, worth a few pennies, and the movie companies make millions off that. All 'entertainers' could be paid the new minimum wage. We could create a new level of welfare with that, and free healthcare to boot.

D

Want your elected reps to know what you think? Go to Congress.org, it's real easy.

You can also send faxes to your reps for free from NumbersUSA.

Scott, are these people really this stupid? Or am I nuts?

Scott, are these people really this stupid?  Or am I nuts?

Roberts: “Though people find it hard to believe during such a devastating year, you still make a significant increase in your profit. And they’re saying, ‘Good grief, we trusted you.’”

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Business Sense

I posted this above, but bears repeating here:

Appears that MSM feels no company should profit except themselves.  Isn't that the reason companies go into business-to make a profit.  In the years insurance companies lose monies, what if policyholders gave them some of the monies they made during that year!  Better yet, why not let the media give all their profits from the coverage of the hurricane & other disasters to the victims.  Bet they didn't give FREE advertising for the coverage they gave!  For people who think that uniform school dress is not constitutional, they feel every business should be a non profit business, that govt should control everything-except control what is on the airways, and that every person in the USA should receive the same salary, no matter what their job is-except themselves of course.  I could rant on & on, but it appears I have!!

I wonder if Roberts's next st

I wonder if Roberts's next story will be how people who bet on the Bears to win the Super Bowl should get their money back since they were on the losing end of the bet.  I get so tired of hearing about these people who decided to go cheap and underinsure themselves "suffering" at the hands of the insurance companies.

I've yet to meet an insurance salesperson who didn't stress ad nauseum the limits of my policies in an effort to get me to buy additional insurance.  The claim that these folks didn't understand what was covered and what wasn't, in an area that was a disaster waiting to happen like New Orleans, is rediculous.  I've never lived near any major body of water and I was always pitched some type of flood insurance, so I can imagine how much agents in New Orleans would push for people to spend a few extra bucks and get the additional coverage.

Does anyone else remember The

Does anyone else remember The Parable of the Wise and Foolish Builder?  Sounds like some foolish builders want a "Muligan".

Muligan - mullets...

Sorry in advance. But when you mentioned "muligan" it made me think of mullets and that took me here. enjoy

Here a mullet, there a mull

Here a mullet, there a mullet.

Ohhh! Here's a good one.

D

Want your elected reps to know what you think? Go to Congress.org, it's real easy.

You can also send faxes to your reps for free from NumbersUSA.

Robin sure has come a long wa

Robin sure has come a long way from her ESPN roots...well maybe not so much! It amazes me that the only time the MSM wants to talk to anyone in business is when they have made "outrageous" or "obscene" profits. But I never see any of the big hearted libsters like Katie, Diane, Babwa, or Trollsie O'Donnell coming out their fat pockets to help anyone! I guess being a liberal means living like a king and sympathizing with the starving, huh?

When are we going to get a

When are we going to get a story on the wrongfull profits of abortion clinics?

The place that will never hang out the sign of 3 billion served.

R2P...Not anytime soon from o

R2P...

Not anytime soon from our friends in the liberal MSM. Probably because they have used the services of these butchers and just looooove the service. I mean think about it... Jump in bed for a romp, get impregnated, run to clinic, snip-cut-suck-club-toss, $300 bucks and life is good. Liberals... pathetic people!

This "reporter" nee

This "reporter" needs to visit her state's Insurance Commission and find out how premiums are set.  She can also find out how many years any particular insurance company actually makes a profit in its property and casualty division.  In a premium raise request, the insurance company has to provide the Insurance Commission with a pile of paper work that shows its premium increase history, its insurance business profit (loss), its estimated loss projections, and so on.  The commission people then go over all this paper work.  Then either staff actuaries or consulting actuaries go over the request, examine all the math involved and make a recommendation to the Commission to either approve or reject the proposal, or recommend an  increase, but not as much as the insurance company wants.  It is a lengthy process that is similar to a hemmoroid (bloody pain in the ... ).

This is just one more case where the "reporter" does not bother to do the proper research to gather the facts for the story, and injects his/her marxist opinion as to what ought to be.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Mike, I am confused.  Are yo

Mike, I am confused.  Are you saying this "reporter" should...um...what is that...called...

Um...do some RESEARCH???

Why should she when she can lust over more money to steal? 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

research? Bah humbug. polls & consensus are on their side!

Why bother doing research nowadays when all you really need are positive poll numbers and a consensus!

Mike - VERY well put, I used

Mike - VERY well put, I used to work for a State Insurance Dept.  You are 100% correct (see my day-late-dollar-short post below).

Recuse Roberts

"...shouldn’t a professional journalist report such a personal, emotional link up front and not leave it to the very end of the segment?"  IMHO, a professional journalist in her situation should stay far away from pretending to be a fair, objective reporter when her family was directly affected.

Roberts: “But despite weath

Roberts: “But despite weathering the worst national disaster in history, critics point out, the insurance companies made record profits in 2005, $49 billion, in fact, growing to $60 billion last year. When people who have lost everything, who are in dispute with various insurance companies and they see the amount of money that-- the profit that is being made in such a year, these home owners scratch their heads a little bit. Do you understand?”

Once again, another Leftist that has no concept of why businesses take risks with their money and go into business in the first place.  If there is a profit, regardless of the circumstances, there has to be dishonesty of some sort. 

Insurance companies zealously invest money paid in premiums to make profit and remain solvent in the event of catastrophe (I work for one, I should know.  What's more, I also worked for the Deputy Insurance Commissioner of the State of FL and understand the pressure put on insurance companies to remain solvent).

This is more evidence of the Useful Idiots pandering to class envy in this country.  Anytime someone rails against "big business", rest assured on some level there's class envy involved.  Roberts's comment is a perfect example.

Hey FSU,Tell me about it....a

Hey FSU,

Tell me about it....although I'd have to be somewhat suspect with the "record profit" in 2005...These companies should have reserved a substantial amount to cover their potential "losses" that were still in litigation at the time they posted their earnings.  I'd think 2006 earnings would be more indicative of the impact of the 2005 season, particularly in light of the fact that Wilma didn't hit Florida until late October 2005.

I just have a problem with the entire statement from a strictly accounting point of view.

B - These companies should ha

B -

These companies should have reserved a substantial amount to cover their potential "losses" that were still in litigation at the time they posted their earnings. 

This is what I mean when I say "solvency".  Insurance regulators require accountability by the companies to ensure that they have enough to cover these loses.

The purpose of my post was to point out hysteria over a company making profits and just the automatic assumption that it is crooked.

CR, the Insurance companies a

CR, the Insurance companies are also severely limited on the amount of return on investment they are allowed to make before they are required by law to reduce premiums.  Some Insurance Commissioner in New Jersey determined that the ROI should be no more than 3.5%.  I don't remember the name of that Insurance Commissioner, it's just one of those bits of data that have faded in the mists of time.

You and Blonde are correct: those profits that the insurance companies make are, for the most part, invested to build up reserves for those years when losses are above what the companies project.  The companies must remain solvent in order to meet future obligations.  If some marxist zealot decides that insurance companies are not to make any profit, then there will be no reserves to pay off future claims.  If this reporter were any more myopic, she will need a red-tipped white cane.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Mike, thanks.  That any busi

Mike, thanks.  That any business should have an ROI limit placed on them by the government is criminal.  Again, this is nothing more than throwing a bone to the class warriors in this country. 

I think it all goes back to

I think it all goes back to the attitude of entitlement.

Senselessly killed by random thug = no government money.
Senselessly killed on 9/11 = $1.2 million (average) from US Gov't.

My house got destroyed by a tornado = I'm not covered if I live in tornado alley.
My house got destroyed by Katrina = I'm not covered ... but the insurance company should make an exception because it's Katrina.

It reminds me of the following item that went around a few weeks ago after the big blizzard in Colorado:

Up here, in the "Mile-High City", we just recovered from a Historic event --- may I even say a "Weather Event" of "Biblical Proportions" --- with a historic blizzard of up to 44" inches of snow and winds to 90 MPH that broke trees in half, knocked down utility poles, stranded hundreds of motorists in lethal snow banks, closed ALL roads, isolated scores of communities and cut power to 10's of thousands.

For the record:

  • George Bush did not come.
  • FEMA did nothing.
  • No one howled for the government.
  • No one blamed the government.
  • No one even uttered an expletive on TV.
  • Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton did not visit.
  • Our Mayor did not blame Bush or anyone else.
  • Our Governor did not blame Bush or anyone else, either.
  • CNN, ABC, CBS, FOX or NBC did not visit -- or even report on this category 5 snowstorm.
  • Nobody demanded $2,000 debit cards.
  • No one asked for a FEMA Trailer House.
  • No one looted.
  • Nobody demanded the government do something. (Nobody expected the government to do anything, either.)
  • No Larry King, No Bill O'Rielly, No Oprah, No Chris Mathews and No Geraldo Rivera.
  • No Sean Penn, No Barbara Striesand, No Hollywood types to be found.

Nope, we just melted the snow for water. Sent out caravans of SUV's to pluck people out of snow engulfed cars. The truck drivers pulled people out of snow banks and didn't ask for a penny. Local restaurants made food and the police and fire departments delivered it to the snowbound families. Families took in the stranded people -- total strangers.

We fired up wood stoves, broke out coal oil lanterns or Coleman lanterns.

We did not wait for some affirmative action government program to get us out of this mess with a welfare program that trades votes for 'sittin at home' checks.

Even though a Category "5" blizzard of this scale has never fallen this early, we know it can happen and how to deal with it ourselves.

~~~
VOTE DEMOCRAT!

(It's easier than thinking)