Wire Service Spreads Misleading Bush-Killed-Kyoto History

Photo of Tim Graham.

One common media-created misconception in the Bush years is that the Clinton administration fully supported the international Kyoto Protocol to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but the Bush administration arrived and refused to take any action on it. In reality, while Vice President Al Gore signed the Kyoto agreement for the United States, the Clinton administration never submitted it to the Senate for ratification (just like Bush), and the Senate voted 95 to zippy in a nonbinding sense-of-the-Senate resolution against Kyoto in 1997, because the agreement would curb American and European emissions, but place no restrictions whatsoever on China or other polluting "developing" nations.

Agence France Presse was the latest to use bias by omission to relay the Bush-killed-Kyoto theory. It was a story on that global savior Al Gore, declaring he would not run for president in 2008:

Gore was the US negotiator for the international Kyoto Protocol that set global goals on emission of so-called greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, produced by the burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal.

The protocol was agreed in 1997 and took effect in February 2005, but Bush refused to ratify it, citing its high economic cost and the fact that China and India, the world's largest producers of greenhouse gases after the United States were, as developing nations, not bound by it.

It's quite astounding that liberals would both (1) vote unanimously to avoid Kyoto and (2) trash Bush as the main stumbling block to Kyoto.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We can let the facts get in t

We can let the facts get in the way of a good Bush Bash.

Poor Liberal, he's educated beyond his intelligence

I am so sick of this canard

I am so sick of this canard that I just want to scream whenever I see or hear it now!!! This has now become one of those " facts" that should actually be listed under "urban legends" on Snopes.com

It proves the maxim that if you tell a big enough lie, often enough, eventually everyone will believe it's the truth.

EXACTLY. If a lie is repeated

EXACTLY. If a lie is repeated often enough eventually SOME will believe it's the truth. But it's still a lie (that turns its adherents into blithering idiots [like Al Gore] and intellectual zombies [like Al Gore]).

Why would you find this ast

Why would you find this astounding? All it takes is a bit of brass and compliant media to give cover. There's been no shortage of either for the past -- well, as long as I can remember...

Why is everything Bush's fault?

These Democrat(ic)s are really getting outrageous with their claims.  These fools ignore the facts just so they can pound on Bush a little more.  It's pathetic.  Hey a$$holes, in case you don't remember Bush isn't running for president.  It's time you wafflers start taking responsibility and do the GD job the people elected (under false pretenses I might add) you to do.  You ran on NOTHING, and now you are doing NOTHING!  I have never seen one party play politics so much with EVERYTHING.  Get over yourselves.

Sure, I watch the MSM...     Through a pair of crosshairs.

"Sure I watch the MSM ..

"Sure I watch the MSM ... through a pair of crosshairs."

THERE IT IS.

Mr. Anderson

Are you saying you like my quote?  It is (c) by the Spiffster.  Like a good capitalist, I will be charging $5 per use.  Authorized or not.  $-)

Thanks man. 

Sure, I watch the MSM...     Through a pair of crosshairs.

"It's quite astounding t

"It's quite astounding that liberals would ... trash Bush as the main stumbling block to Kyoto [when the SENATE voted 95-0 in 1997 to reject it]."

Damn right. The liberal bias in the MSM never ends ... that's why all my news is filtered through CONSERVATIVE news sources.

I believe this sums it up...

I believe this sums it up...

      Agence France Presse

" . . . but Bush refused

" . . . but Bush refused to ratify it."

Not only did AFP get the facts wrong, they got the Constitution wrong.  The President doesn't ratify treaties; the Senate does.  The Clinton White House, through then-VP Prince Albert Gore, negotiated this pitifully political international treaty, and the President -- realizing that it had no support in the Senate --- sat on it.   That's okay, the Senate voted anyway, and sent a very clear message to Clinton that the proposed treaty was DOA.

There's nothing left for Bush to do, unless he wants to pro-actively lobby the Senate for its ratification, which he thankfully declines to do.  If the Democratic-controlled Senate wants to push for ratification, they can bring it up in committee. 

Sorry Galvanic, you are sooooooooo wrong

Sorry Galvanic, you are sooooooooo wrong. Everyone knows Bush is the decider. He lied us into this war,and won't pullout. He spent more money than anyone in history. He failed to save the southern coast from Katrina. He has stopped foreign policy from reaching out. He started worldwar 3 or 4, 5 if you're counting Iran. He left children behind. He destroyed our air and poisoned our water. I'll never forgive him for what he did to my daughter. Now his oil stocks have made him richer,he's taken over the middle east before he failed in the war, and he destroyed free rights and the free press.

 How can you even say something like you said, when we know he ripped the Kyoto Treaty up the day he stole into the whitehouse as the sitting tyrannist terrortist peon.

 There. Now everyone is reconfirmed in the belief that only the president does anything, ever.

He is also responsible for

He is also responsible for my back pain and four herniated disks and making me retire before I really wanted to.

Geez, Sport, you forgot raise the dead, huh?

Geez, Sport, you forgot raise the dead, huh?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Actually aciaguana

Actually aciaguana, I forgot to mention that he ignores congress, he refuses to work with them, he doesn't listen to them,or anyone,and has never vetoed one of their bills, since he is in direct opposition to the nations desire at all times.

Yah, Sport, that makes sense. :-) ACA

Yah, Sport, that makes sense.  <scratching head> :-) ACA

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

make up your mind.......Is he

make up your mind.......

Is he ignoring congress or refusing to work with them??? Maybe the decider decided that you are not to make sense.

florida_chad; go back to funny class. You are way deficient.

florida_chad; go back to funny class.  You are way deficient.

:^<

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

no clases here until the fall

no classes here until the fall semester. How about down your way? I could bring some red stuff for the lizzards.

I'm a bit curious as to why

I'm a bit curious as to why you mentioned spending....(Maybe he thought I was gone for the day after proving my antilibertarian bias case again!)
JMR

Funny, you can't prove a sing

Funny, you can't prove a single thing you just spewed from your pie-hole.

Let's focus on just the spe

Let's focus on just the spending part, can you disprove that??
JMR

Congress..................nex

Congress..................next?

Virgin-veto-pen (at least,

Virgin-veto-pen (at least, as far as spending-bills go!).......Next?
JMR