Liberated by her firing-qua-resignation, ex-John Edwards blogger Amanda Marcotte has reverted to form: using vulgarity to insult her political opponents. On a whim I thought I'd check in at Marcotte's site, Pandagon, and wasn't surprised to find her slurring Michelle Malkin, with shots at Ann Coulter and the two leading conservative women's organizations thrown in for good measure.Marcotte decided to respond to an inquiry from a poster she labelled a troll who had written: "does it bother you that one of the major architects of your demise was herself a strong woman, Michelle Malkin?"
That set Marcotte off on this tirade that included these gems of logic and literary flair [editing mine; unexpurgated vulgarity in the original]:
- "I do want to address this false premise that someone like Malkin is a 'strong woman' Women who kow-tow to male dominance by aggressively attacking women who actually do rebel against oppression can expect to have sexist men blow this particular 'strong woman' smoke up their --- all the time. It means nothing. To the degree that these men mean it, they are mistaking a------ry for strength."
- "There is nothing strong about the ladies of Concerned Women of America or Independent Women's Forum or a------ like Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin. There is nothing strong about selling other women down the river so that sexist men will pat you on the head and say, 'What a gooooood woman you are. Now go attack another uppity b---- and maybe this time I’ll give you a cookie.'”
- "One thing I’ve learned that Ana Marie [Cox, ex-Wonkette] apparently has not is that if you smile at sexist pigs and play their games, they may be nicer to your face, but they’re still going to call you a c--- behind your back."
- "And that is the golden rule to remember when the Oink Patrol dangles money and praise in front of your face, or will even call you strong, so long as you agree to suck up your dignity and promote sexism—they still think you’re a c---. The commenter who called Michelle Malkin 'strong' would flip around and call her a c--- so fast it would make your head spin, if she ever showed a sign of a real backbone and stood up for something real for once in her life. So the real question is, 'By the way, does it bother you that one of the major architects of your demise was herself a sniveling sell-out, Michelle Malkin?' And really, I think that answers itself."
Must-see-Hot Air TV: Funny and -- dare I say -- strong Michelle Malkin inteprets Marcotte's own words here.
Update 02-21-07: One of Marcotte's faithful followers, FerrarimanF355, has posted a comment on her thread over at Pandagon, alerting Amanda to this column, and calling on her to set the record straight about my assertion that she uses vulgarity to describe opponents. Only one problem. In describing NewsBusters, FerrarimanF355 uses -- you guessed it -- a vulgarity. Vroom, vroom!
Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
This is almost as good as t
February 19, 2007 - 14:12 ET by 1sttofightThis is almost as good as the Debra Frisch episode from last year. It is always good to see a liberal, when faced with reality, meltdown.
..
February 19, 2007 - 14:21 ET by Jnoblethis woman seems very angry and pent up inside. I think I know what she's really frustrated about and what she needs to lighten up. Since this is a PG rated site, I won't go into detail about what it is that she really needs and, based on that headshot, I am NOT volunteering to do it myself! :-D
What she really wants is a
February 19, 2007 - 14:24 ET by 1sttofightWhat she really wants is a penis she does not have to strap on.
...her rechargeables didn't r
February 19, 2007 - 14:43 ET by gfrrman...her rechargeables didn't recharge...
You know the old saying......
February 19, 2007 - 15:04 ET by DRM 23You know the old saying........This girl is pretty in two ways: PRETTY ugly and PRETTY likely to stay that way.
The pathetic, misogynistic
February 19, 2007 - 16:24 ET by Rupert CadellThe pathetic, misogynistic sexual-projection garbage that almost every poster on this thread has spouted is exactly why modern feminism is still necessary. Way to objectify women everywhere.
You all realize, of course,
February 19, 2007 - 16:35 ET by saurusYou all realize, of course, that responding to this person in this way is no better than what she is doing? People can differ on her appearence (I happen to think she's rather attractive, and I like her haircut), but what is important is the substance of her words.
Liberals attack people with slurs on their appearence, sexual identity, etc. Conservatives should be above that.
Exactly saurus. We have re
February 19, 2007 - 16:38 ET by Rupert CadellExactly saurus. We have references to strap-ons, penis envy, and "All she needs is a good f--k," in the first ten posts. Not to mention general comments on her appearance. Could you guys make your pent-up sexual issues any more obvious? It has nothing to do with anything and only demonstrates the kind of antiquated woman-hating mindset that real feminism tries to counteract.
Hey Rupert...
February 19, 2007 - 16:43 ET by Six String SpiffHey Rupert, So you will hammer us for firing BACK at her? Gimmie a break... You Feminazis always have the gender card ready to be used at any moment, just like the racial reverand whores... Cram it.
Sure, I watch the MSM... Through a pair of crosshairs.
SSS, I think she makes an int
February 19, 2007 - 16:49 ET by Rupert CadellSSS, I think she makes an interesting (not necessarily correct) point in a really innappropriate way. And yes, I see no problem "hammering" people who are basically using feminist views they happen to disagree with to fantasize about her sexual proclivities. It's a frightening, long-standing trend: men find something a woman says disagreeable and turn it into an excuse to regard her as a sexualized object. Why not offer a point-by-point rebuttal to her comments instead of making locker room jokes about how she must be a lesbian who doesn't get laid? It only demonstrates your own insecurity.
Hey Dr. Phill er Rupert
February 19, 2007 - 18:23 ET by Six String SpiffHere we go again... Some fool walks in here and starts analyzing my feelings... Look bud, I work at a bench fixing things all day. So when I come in here to smack a feminazi around and get back to work, I don't need some psychiatrist running around telling me about my supposed insecurity.. Talk about big headed. Don't you have some child molesters to defend? Get lost. Lets not forget who started bashing who. This feminazi gets everything she deserves. I am tired of people like her distracting this country with trivial, if not manufactured "issues". NEXT
Sure, I watch the MSM... Through a pair of crosshairs.
Well said. This is what someo
February 20, 2007 - 09:37 ET by DRM 23Well said. This is what someone like her understands. This name calling is what probably gets her goat. Sometimes you have to stoop to their level. To everyone who wants to debate her.....good luck!
Personally I think Marcotte
February 19, 2007 - 16:50 ET by zhombrePersonally I think Marcotte is just a jerk & a whiner, who will write the most scurrilous and nasty crap about her opponents but gets livid if anybody dares turn the vitriol on her. I have no sexual feelings about her. If I want to unleash those pent up sexual feelings, well, the internet is a great window to porn of all forms and to all imaginable kinks. Frankly, some of Marcotte's blogging I've read is rather vulgar sexually. What does say about her?
I make no reference to th
February 19, 2007 - 19:04 ET by saurusI make no reference to the sexual innuendo on NB referring to this woman, and I personally am FAR from a feminazi or femme apologist. I think the posts I've read attributed to her are repulsive.
My only point is that by posting comments like some here, we are stooping to her level - the lowest common denominator. We should be above this, if indeed we claim to be better than dimocrats.
Sorry guys, but she's right
February 19, 2007 - 14:19 ET by Jack BauerSorry guys, but she's right.
I just looked up the word "**n*" in my dictionary and it showed a picture of Marcotte!
Grrrrrr. And is she a hottie or what with her Louise Brooks bob?
She's a snotty hottie. Actual
February 19, 2007 - 14:59 ET by winston smithShe's a snotty hottie. Actually she looks like Molly Ringwald on a bad-hair day.
She's not hot. She's the k
February 19, 2007 - 15:06 ET by Eric TurnerShe's not hot. She's the kind of girl that would make a guy change his last name in order to marry her. And then make him wear a slave's collar and chain (not that there's anything wrong with that).
She's another angry, miserabl
February 19, 2007 - 15:09 ET by gfrrmanShe's another angry, miserable liberal. Gotta be a hell of existance to wake up that way everyday. ...."liberalism is a mental disease"
Jackson, I think all she need
February 19, 2007 - 15:50 ET by Roger the ShrubberJackson, I think all she needs is a good dose of Roger's Shrubbery.
I think I'll go post that on her site. I think she would appreciate my point of view, she being open-minded and such.
...
February 19, 2007 - 17:30 ET by Jack Bauer...
...
February 19, 2007 - 17:33 ET by Jack Bauer...
Aye Shrubbster -- you shoul
February 19, 2007 - 17:38 ET by Jack BauerAye Shrubbster -- you should certainly hoe that weed.
Actually for those who assumed I'm so desperate that I really do dream of Meanie with the light brown sneer, I'm thinking Mandy reminds me of the hatchet-faced mother of Uncle Joe Stalin.
I already posted on her "blog" pointing out that unlike Ms Malkin, Mandy's the sort of really "strong" woman who kow-tows to Bill Clinton. That well known upholder of womens's rights... to be cigared, and allegedly raped a la Juanita Broaddrick.
Though I suspect this is one woman the likes of Marcotte thinks was "asking for it".
(Check out this thread and see how strongwoman Mandy loves him.)
Anyone else see the irony of
February 19, 2007 - 14:23 ET by rightsideAnyone else see the irony of her calling men "sexist pigs", but has no problem being so promiscuous with them, just to show the "Godbags" that she can have as much sex as possible, just to stick her thumb in evangelicals eyes?
...or does irony escape liberals?
I would imagine the only se
February 19, 2007 - 14:26 ET by 1sttofightI would imagine the only sex she gets is after the bar closes.
My sentiments, exactly. Goo
February 19, 2007 - 15:08 ET by kathleenirishMy sentiments, exactly. Good point.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
err, my post was intended for
February 19, 2007 - 15:10 ET by kathleenirisherr, my post was intended for right's, not 1st's.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
Thanks, I appreciate that kat
February 20, 2007 - 07:40 ET by rightsideThanks, I appreciate that kathleenirish.
It would be quite an understa
February 19, 2007 - 14:24 ET by GalvanicIt would be quite an understatement to say that Ms. Marcotte "has issues."
She's obviously worships at the House of Uber-Feminists, but apparently mistakes vitriolic tirades for 'strength.' A measure of one's strength is effectiveness, and I have yet to see any signs of Marcotte's; she appears to regurgitate rhetoric. On the other hand, Malkin's appears to be quite effective in getting her message out, primarily through dogged research and the courage to write about her findings in the face of feminist backlash.
Malkin remains a prominent voice in the public forum; Marcotte returns to blogger oblivion.
Re: Michelle's interpretation
February 19, 2007 - 14:27 ET by MikeBRe: Michelle's interpretation of Marcotte...that there's funny! I don't care who you are. And a tip of the hat to Larry the Cable guy for that line.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
I'd really like to meet her
February 19, 2007 - 14:28 ET by Eric TurnerI'd really like to meet her father. She is a very sad, angry little woman. I wonder what she's going to do when she looks back on her life when she's 70 or so and didn't accomplish anything but being angry all the time.
Does she really think she is that important? Something I learned in the Army is that you may love the Army, but the Army doesn't love you. Meaning it keeps trucking along and will continue long after you leave. Know your place in life and be important to those who you can influence most - your wife (or husband) and your children. Everything else wil fall into place.
Does she really think she is
February 19, 2007 - 14:52 ET by fosstenDoes she really think she is that important?
Therein lies the key. Neither should we.
Finkelstein, stop giving this piece of human debris any more coverage. She's not a member of the press, nor is her blog attracting anything but total wackos. She's like the female version of Olbermann, and she doesn't deserve this much attention.
Our motto for the Navy was &q
February 19, 2007 - 15:20 ET by BruzillaOur motto for the Navy was "I love the f%&*ing Navy because the Navy loves f%&*ing me."
I wonder what she's going to
February 19, 2007 - 16:16 ET by FishFace222I wonder what she's going to do when she looks back on her life when she's 70 or so and didn't accomplish anything but being angry all the time.
I don't think anyone that angry can live until they are 70. She'll look 70 when she's about 45.
This is a very sad person.
February 19, 2007 - 14:29 ET by 10thAmendmentThis is a very sad person. She seems so angry, sad and full of hate that I can't help but wonder what happened to her in her childhood.
Everyone who isn't her is a sexist pig?
Hate speech okay from the left. After all they are better than the rest of us.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Hello? Miss Marcotte? Who
February 19, 2007 - 14:49 ET by kathleenirishHello? Miss Marcotte? Who sells women up the river? Who has helped create a more misognynistic, woman-objectifying culture than the one we used to live in that was supposedly so oppressive? Who has enabled bad, no, EVIL behavior against women by powerful men (e.g.: Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, etc....)? Who worships these rapist and/or murderers on their knees, even one who has famously claimed she would "earn her presidential knee pads" by pleasuring Bill Clinton if it would keep partial-birth abortion legal? Why, it's that phony Women's Rights, Women's Lib Movement! Men, and women, respect Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin and other conservative women because of their intellect and abilities, not because of their sex, but because of who they are. You are a pathetic, angry, f*d up loser. As a Catholic Christian, your deviant and horribly offensive characterization of a sacred tenet of my faith last week showed me how much of a hater and low-life bigot you were, but your utter lack of insight into the truth about the Women's Rights Movement and where women are nowadays, not advanced but instead oppressed in new ways that are promoted and tolerated by the pretenders and profiteers of their agenda, just shows how much of a stupid kool-aid drinker you and your type are. The breakdown of the family, marriage and the resultant povertization of single-parent women-lead families and the mainstreaming of porn, are a few of the not-so-positive results of the "Women's Rights" movement on our society. Hardly indefensible. You get too much attention for your extreme and nasty point of view.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
I'm sooo wishing I could bump
February 19, 2007 - 15:21 ET by tracheostomyI'm sooo wishing I could bump this statement. Kudos.
-PJ
I've mentioned that before.
February 19, 2007 - 15:24 ET by Eric TurnerI've mentioned that before. NB needs a way to rate statements or something to just acknowledge really well-written, articulate statements.
Exactly, Kathleen. In sever
February 19, 2007 - 15:26 ET by dahliatraversExactly, Kathleen. In several ways, Bill Clinton was remarkably disrespectful, even degrading, to women, especially powerless or vulnerable women. Ditto his wife by participating wholeheartedly in the "nuts and sluts" attack on his girlfriends.
Further to your point, do Gloria Steinem and her sisters believe that vulnerable women are exempt from feminist rights? But how else do they justify their support and endorsement of Bill and Hillary Clinton?
ouch k/irish
February 19, 2007 - 15:29 ET by foolnomorewow girl,glad ta see ya weren't going to tell her, what was really on your mind..
Bless and support All the troops--liberalism is a mental disorder!
I'll be honest: I have an iss
February 19, 2007 - 15:41 ET by kathleenirishI'll be honest: I have an issue with wanting to punch people like her in the face. I did say last week I would love to run into her "in person". I'm sure I only mean it figuratively, right? A verbal exchange, very mature and articulate....just like me, sure.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
Why did I go there? Wow. Sh
February 19, 2007 - 14:53 ET by CrimsonfistedWhy did I go there? Wow. She clearly needs help, not only with her soul but better writing skills. And what does this mean:
I would say that statement applies to HER.
WhatAMaroon
I think her writings should b
February 19, 2007 - 15:22 ET by BruzillaI think her writings should be filed in the "Painfully Ironic" folder as her "sexist pig" rantings are exactly the same as those of guys that I've known who've been screwed over by a woman. I wonder if she has any idea how much she sounds like those guys!
So this potty-mouthed ball of
February 19, 2007 - 15:24 ET by Dave RSo this potty-mouthed ball of hate is the type of person a man with presidential aspirations hires to blog for his campaign. It is said that an emloyee is a reflection upon their employer. Johnny Edwards must be a real classy guy. Bet he doesn't survive the first cut.
Those eyes in that pic are about the coldest pair of peepers I have ever seen on another human being. Kind of makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up.
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman
Chuck Manson says: "Sh
February 19, 2007 - 15:28 ET by benrandChuck Manson says: "She is a litte tiny bit batshit crazy my friend, gone man, gone, she's gone brother!"
I said on the last thread abo
February 19, 2007 - 15:28 ET by msh1973I said on the last thread about this dreadful woman that she is in need of serious help. My mom use to tell me and my siblings that you could judge a person by the type of language they used, well she couldn't have been more correct. I believe we have given Marcotte way too much attention. It is time to move on people, nothing more to see here.
Here is her wikipedia entry
February 19, 2007 - 15:33 ET by Eric TurnerHere is her wikipedia entry. Fairly innocuous. But it just kinda "smells" leftist slant.
I will say though you should take a look at the discussion page behind the entry page. Talk about the justification these liberals use for changing wording and such. If I weren't lazy, I would do some research to see if they hold the same justification for rewording things in conservative folks' entries as they do liberals (cf. Reagan with Carter, et al)
"...Women who kow-tow to
February 19, 2007 - 15:43 ET by winston smith"...Women who kow-tow to male dominance...."
Face it Amanda, all you do is pontificate behind a keyboard and computer. Michelle is out there every day speaking her mind and stating her values to the MSM 95 percent of which, despise her every word. She bravely faces down left-wing crybabies and lunatics on campus and on the internet--- and manages to do it all without hint of profanity or religious bigotry. We've yet to see you make a coherent point without adding in plenty of verbal garbage. Do you honestly think profanity and religious hatred actually help women? And speaking of kow-towing to "male dominance" Michele once told Chris Matthews (a man---we think) where to go-- right on his television show. She also wasn't afraid to speak out disapprovingly of the GOP when the Foley scandal broke. She is a rebel in my book because she doesn't "kow-tow" to the orthodox liberal point of view as you do every day. As a writer, a speaker, a wonk, Michele stands head and shoulders over anything you have ever done or will ever do. Michele has become a conservative visionary in only a few years since she appeared on the political scene and her writings and opinoins are highly respected by men and women alike. You, on the other hand, can only get noticed by continually demeaning people of faith. How "liberal" of you Amanda! So please, stay right there in your miserable forum and provide the Democrat party with lots of miserable dispatches and wretched opinons every day. The GOP can use the help. Oh, and thanks again for effectively eliminating John Edwards from the '08 Presidential race.
M Malkin is a liberal's (espe
February 19, 2007 - 15:57 ET by EdhenryM Malkin is a liberal's (especially liberal women) worst nightmare. She is smart, articulate, pretty, fearless, educated, pretty, direct, fact based, pretty, grounded in the fundamentals of the United States, non-manipulative, pretty, equal opportunity minded, politically savvy and tough. Real tough.
Did I mention she was good looking?
And she will be a U S Senator
February 19, 2007 - 16:00 ET by EdhenryAnd she will be a U S Senator one day of her choosing
I leave for a few days and su
February 20, 2007 - 13:55 ET by balboaI leave for a few days and suddenly Malkin is nonmanipulative? Are you kidding? Queen of crying "FIRE" in crowded theaters?
Bal, give us some examples.
February 21, 2007 - 23:01 ET by Chicago RepublicanBal, give us some examples. How is Malkin manipulative?
She states facts, and confuse
February 21, 2007 - 23:11 ET by gfrrmanShe states facts, and confuses the liberal mind(ball of mush)...
Talk About Manipulative There Bal
February 21, 2007 - 23:35 ET by emjem24You want to talk about manipulation, Bal? What about every word coming from your mouth being manipulative? Face it, Bal, you have a PERSONAL beef against Michelle Malkin and you know it. You're kidding no one. I don't think that Michelle is manipulative, I think that she's well-spoken, strong, and kow-tows to no one. As to crying "fire" in a crowded room, that's absurd and you know it. Please give me some proof to back up your assertion or you're just full of baloney. Students in middle school, high school, and college shouldn't get away with it and neither should you. If you're going to criticize someone back it up. If not, it's a smear.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Oh heaven's pay no attention
February 21, 2007 - 23:54 ET by bigtimerOh heaven's pay no attention to boa,...
He was the first one months and months back to put a link here with Malkin's face with the wrong body...as a woman I noticed it right off, said so, as others noticed it was photo-shopped, (hope that is the proper term)...he just doesn't like a gal that speaks the truth...with finesse.
LOL!
Malkin rules!
Pretty too!
It's the same for any black c
February 19, 2007 - 16:19 ET by FishFace222It's the same for any black conservative--"Uncle Tom"
Holy Cow! This woman think
February 19, 2007 - 16:00 ET by motherbeltHoly Cow! This woman thinks Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin denigrate women???????????? They have nothing on her. She has no use for women who don't subscribe to her twisted view.
Sad. So very sad.
February 19, 2007 - 16:14 ET by Iowa BoyPeople who stay angry all the time will never know happiness. All their problems are beacuse someone else did them wrong. They verbally scourge others because it's the only way they can feel better about themselves.
I find her a pitiable woman.
I really think Marcotte sho
February 19, 2007 - 16:23 ET by zhombreI really think Marcotte should be embalmed and that Anna Nicole Smith should have a blog (that Howard Stern could write for her as executor of her estate).
So, Finklestein, you fascist,
February 19, 2007 - 16:25 ET by Agnostic frontSo, Finklestein, you fascist, it's apparently fine and dandy with you that NB gloriously denigrates this woman for nothing, really, yet my innocuous comments get deleted. Oh, well.
Did someone lose their sipp
February 19, 2007 - 16:30 ET by MightyMouthDid someone lose their sippy cup? Does someone need a hug?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
You're welcome to express y
February 19, 2007 - 16:34 ET by Mark FinkelsteinYou're welcome to express your political opinions. It was your vulgarity that got your comments deleted.
Ag,NB gloriously denigrates
February 19, 2007 - 17:01 ET by Dave RAg,
NB gloriously denigrates this woman for nothing, really,
I hardly think trashing the deeply held beliefs of close to 75% +/- of the people of this country was nothing. While as a libertarian I fully support her right to say whatever she wishes, but John Edwards showed very poor judgment in not only hiring this person but in defending her actions. This is a man who is running for president, so his judgment, or lack thereof, is a legitimate issue of debate.
As for your removed post, I'd be really careful if I were you, as trolls haven't been fairing to well around here lately. They seem to be disappearing on a fairly regular basis.
Word to the wise, as they say. :-)
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman
"This woman" denigr
February 19, 2007 - 17:18 ET by kathleenirish"This woman" denigrated millions in the lowest, most degrading way, including me. She's got to be able to take it if she deals it. It'll be very difficult for anyone here to come close to the low levels she went to when she felt free to spew from her trash-n-garbage mouth. However, I do not condone mocking her in some of the ways certain posters have chosen to participate in here. Men are always deciding how 'hot' women are, I have noticed, and I don't get that thinking, but I am not a man. She's the one who said she'd 'f--k' as often as she'd like, so it really can't be that offensive to her to have men talk about whether or not they'd participate with her in an activity she says she likes to do.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph
It's pretty obvious to me t
February 19, 2007 - 16:44 ET by Squalls BladeIt's pretty obvious to me that this woman needs to get laid. Her anger at men is because they won't touch her, and with that face I don't think that's going to change. Any men here wanna lend a hand and cool this woman's rage?
Democracy is not enough. If the culture dies, the country dies. - Pat Buchanan
The sad part is this "xx
February 19, 2007 - 16:47 ET by midnight cowboyThe sad part is this "xx chromosone" vile beast was working on the campaign of a major party presidential contender, where the candidate was standing behind, defending this oxygen wasting slut. It stands to reason there must be more of her ilk working on the Edwards campaign.
For the record, not even after polishing off a full bottle of "Jack" would I give this one a second look.
Her and Rosie would make perfect fit.
A better target for her anger
February 19, 2007 - 17:30 ET by pagarhttp://www.thememrib...
Saudi Fatwa: Women Forbidden from Going Online Without Male Guide
Well, I can tell Marcotte wasn't bothered by Malkin.
February 19, 2007 - 17:55 ET by acaiguanaWell, I can tell Marcotte wasn't bothered by Malkin.
She barely bothered to respond.
:-)
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Still keeping up on this non-
February 19, 2007 - 18:10 ET by ferrarimanf355Still keeping up on this non-story of manufactured outrage by Bill Donohue? (Seriously, that man is the last person on Earth who should be calling anyone a bigot.) I might vote for Edwards to spite everyone who fell for this non-story hook, line and sinker.
Uzumaki/Ayanami '08. Because a ninja and an Eva pilot can govern the nation better that what we have now...
ferrarimanf355 - I strongly advise and encourage you to vote.
February 19, 2007 - 18:28 ET by acaiguanaferrarimanf355 - I strongly advise and encourage you to vote.
For Edwards.
That's show 'em. At least Edwards didn't say Macaca, huh?
Obviously you are a Democrat. Who will you vote for with your other 5 votes?
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
aca,Actually, I'd prefer fo
February 19, 2007 - 18:34 ET by Dave Raca,
Actually, I'd prefer for ferrariboy here drive off a cliff. Hopefully before he has a chance to procreate. :-)
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman
He's got a map, two hands and a compass and he still can't
February 19, 2007 - 18:37 ET by acaiguanaHe's got a map, two hands and a compass and he still can't figure out how to find his butt.
:-)
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
This conversation went downhi
February 20, 2007 - 17:37 ET by ferrarimanf355This conversation went downhill real fast. Okay, it's official: talking to you guys is like talking to a brick wall.
Uzumaki/Ayanami '08. Because a ninja and an Eva pilot can govern the nation better that what we have now...
Downhill?? Did ya say DOWNHIL
February 20, 2007 - 17:46 ET by ThisnThatDownhill?? Did ya say DOWNHILL? Heck, it started out in the gutter, went way down the sewer line, gushed out the manholes, and is just now crawling over the curb. I'd say we made a lot of progress. Downhill, indeed!
I might vote for Edwards to
February 20, 2007 - 14:27 ET by Jack BauerI might vote for Edwards to spite everyone who fell for this non-story hook, line and sinker.
That's always a good reason to vote for a candidate..
To spite lots of people you don't know, will never meet, and could care less whether you dropped dead right now.
Tired of Marcotte, guys? Here's a real woman.
February 19, 2007 - 18:44 ET by acaiguanaTired of Marcotte, guys? Here's a real woman.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
My apologies to you Aca, I th
February 19, 2007 - 21:16 ET by MikeBMy apologies to you Aca, I thought for sure that was going to be a photograph of Helen Thomas. I should have know better, as I do not recall one single time you didn't warn us when you posted such a photo.
You're right: Juice Newton is an excellent singer, and pretty much a babe. So is Enya, but she's Irish.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
I'm promoting Juice this week because of her support for the
February 19, 2007 - 21:22 ET by acaiguanaI'm promoting Juice this week because of her support for the troops.
And, I found an old LP Album of hers and put it on CD. Odd, huh?
So, I checked out her Web Page and she's still a looker, huh?
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
She really can't get off th
February 19, 2007 - 19:22 ET by RScooterShe really can't get off the, "Men are like sssooo stupid" kick. At the same time, she blames sexism as the reason why this happened? If she was so flipping smart, why is it so hard for her to understand the reasons for her trouble? How about the fact that about 90% of people in this country believe in God, and are therefore, in at least some sense, religious. And would, by nature, be TOLERANT of other people's religion, and would cast a skeptical eye towards THOSE WHO DO NOT TOLERATE religion. Thus, an INTOLERANT person (although a "feminist", as if that means anything) would be a liability to a person running for president - especially for a person who needs all the votes he can get.
"A society that puts equality ahead of freedom will end up with neither" ~Milton Friedman
Anyone seen Ms. Marcotte and
February 19, 2007 - 20:24 ET by Del DolemonteAnyone seen Ms. Marcotte and Mo Dowd in the same room at the same time?
I'm sorry, but really do f
February 19, 2007 - 20:59 ET by GregAI'm sorry, but really do feel for this young woman. She's walking around with this TREMENDOUS chip on her shoulder, just asking the world to knock it off. She's destined to live with this anger for a long time, until something happens and she can free herself.
Unfortunately, there's really nothing that any of us can do in the meantime, except watch in abject horror and disgust...
Smile
February 20, 2007 - 09:53 ET by ricksanderIs there a photo of this woman smiling?!? Check her myspace. FROWN.
So much whining, so little time.
February 20, 2007 - 14:19 ET by Jason SmithI guess simultaneously juggling the “oppressed little woman” and “strong, progressive activist” personas is a daunting task.
It’s like complaining about the glass ceiling in the workplace, then demanding to play golf from the red tees.
The progressive gals need to make up their mind.
You look at that picture, a
February 20, 2007 - 15:23 ET by Tim the EnchanterYou look at that picture, and the first thing that comes to mind is, "Wow! Who lit the fuse on her tampon??"